This document provides an overview of basic knowledge representation in first-order logic (FOL). It describes how FOL can be used to model objects, properties, classes, and relations in the world. It explains the syntax of FOL, including predicates, terms, quantifiers, and scopes. It also discusses translating English sentences to FOL representations and the semantics and model theory of FOL. Finally, it briefly introduces higher-order logic and the situation calculus for representing change over time.
Basic Knowledge Representation in First Order Logic.pptAshfaqAhmed693399
This document provides an overview of basic knowledge representation in first-order logic (FOL). It discusses objects, properties, classes, and relations that can be modeled in FOL. It also covers the syntax of FOL, including predicates, terms, quantifiers, and scopes. Translation of English sentences to FOL formulas is demonstrated. Semantics such as domains, interpretations, models, validity, and logical consequence are defined. Representing change over time using the situation calculus is briefly discussed.
First-order logic (FOL) extends propositional logic by allowing the representation of objects, properties, relations, and functions. It can represent more complex statements than propositional logic. FOL uses constants to represent objects, predicates to represent properties and relations between objects, and quantifiers like "all" and "some" to make generalized statements. Well-formed formulas in FOL contain terms formed from constants and variables, atomic sentences using predicates on terms, and complex sentences combining atomic sentences with logical connectives and quantifiers so that all variables are bound. FOL allows powerful representation of natural language statements about relationships between objects in a domain.
First-order logic (FOL) allows for increased expressive power over propositional logic by including objects, functions, and relations. The document outlines the syntax and semantics of FOL, including constants, predicates, functions, variables, connectives, equality, and quantifiers. It provides examples of how FOL can be used to define domains like kinship relations, sets, and the Wumpus world. Knowledge engineering in FOL involves identifying the relevant knowledge, vocabulary, and general and specific rules to represent a problem and make inferences.
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.pptxMohanKumarP34
The document discusses knowledge representation and reasoning in artificial intelligence. It covers topics such as symbolic representation using logic, formal logic and inference, first-order logic, basic elements of symbols, terms, atomic and complex sentences using logical connectives, quantifiers, nested quantifiers, equality, inference rules, unification, forward and backward chaining, resolution, and an example problem involving logic.
First-order logic (FOL) is a formal system used in mathematics, philosophy, linguistics, and computer science to represent knowledge about domains involving objects and relations. FOL extends propositional logic with quantifiers and predicates to describe properties of and relations between objects. Well-formed formulas in FOL involve constants, variables, functions, predicates, quantifiers, and logical connectives. The meaning and truth of FOL statements is determined with respect to a structure called a model that specifies a domain of objects and interpretations of symbols. FOL can be used to represent knowledge about many different domains and perform logical inference.
Basic Knowledge Representation in First Order Logic.pptAshfaqAhmed693399
This document provides an overview of basic knowledge representation in first-order logic (FOL). It discusses objects, properties, classes, and relations that can be modeled in FOL. It also covers the syntax of FOL, including predicates, terms, quantifiers, and scopes. Translation of English sentences to FOL formulas is demonstrated. Semantics such as domains, interpretations, models, validity, and logical consequence are defined. Representing change over time using the situation calculus is briefly discussed.
First-order logic (FOL) extends propositional logic by allowing the representation of objects, properties, relations, and functions. It can represent more complex statements than propositional logic. FOL uses constants to represent objects, predicates to represent properties and relations between objects, and quantifiers like "all" and "some" to make generalized statements. Well-formed formulas in FOL contain terms formed from constants and variables, atomic sentences using predicates on terms, and complex sentences combining atomic sentences with logical connectives and quantifiers so that all variables are bound. FOL allows powerful representation of natural language statements about relationships between objects in a domain.
First-order logic (FOL) allows for increased expressive power over propositional logic by including objects, functions, and relations. The document outlines the syntax and semantics of FOL, including constants, predicates, functions, variables, connectives, equality, and quantifiers. It provides examples of how FOL can be used to define domains like kinship relations, sets, and the Wumpus world. Knowledge engineering in FOL involves identifying the relevant knowledge, vocabulary, and general and specific rules to represent a problem and make inferences.
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.pptxMohanKumarP34
The document discusses knowledge representation and reasoning in artificial intelligence. It covers topics such as symbolic representation using logic, formal logic and inference, first-order logic, basic elements of symbols, terms, atomic and complex sentences using logical connectives, quantifiers, nested quantifiers, equality, inference rules, unification, forward and backward chaining, resolution, and an example problem involving logic.
First-order logic (FOL) is a formal system used in mathematics, philosophy, linguistics, and computer science to represent knowledge about domains involving objects and relations. FOL extends propositional logic with quantifiers and predicates to describe properties of and relations between objects. Well-formed formulas in FOL involve constants, variables, functions, predicates, quantifiers, and logical connectives. The meaning and truth of FOL statements is determined with respect to a structure called a model that specifies a domain of objects and interpretations of symbols. FOL can be used to represent knowledge about many different domains and perform logical inference.
This document provides an overview of predicate logic, including:
- The basic components of predicate logic like variables, predicates, quantifiers, and propositional functions
- Explanations of the universal and existential quantifiers
- How to negate quantified expressions using De Morgan's laws
- Examples of translating statements between English and predicate logic
Fuzzy logic was introduced by Lotfi Zadeh in 1965 to address problems with classical logic being too precise. Fuzzy logic allows for truth values between 0 and 1 rather than binary true/false. It involves fuzzy sets, membership functions, linguistic variables, and fuzzy rules. Fuzzy logic can be applied to knowledge representation and inference using concepts like fuzzy predicates, relations, modifiers and quantifiers. It has various applications including household appliances, animation, industrial automation, and more.
1) Propositional functions are propositions that contain variables and have no truth value until the variables are assigned values or quantified.
2) Quantifiers like "for all" (universal quantification) and "there exists" (existential quantification) are used to bind variables and give propositional functions truth values.
3) Quantification can be thought of as nested loops over variables, with universal quantification checking for truth at each value and existential checking for at least one true value.
This document provides an introduction to predicate logic and quantifiers. It begins with terminology like propositional functions, arguments, and universe of discourse. It then defines and provides examples of quantifiers like universal and existential quantifiers. It discusses how to mix quantifiers and their truth values. It also covers binding variables, scope, and negation of quantified statements. Finally, it provides a brief introduction to Prolog, a logic programming language based on predicate logic.
This document discusses predicates and quantifiers in predicate logic. It begins by explaining the limitations of propositional logic in expressing statements involving variables and relationships between objects. It then introduces predicates as statements involving variables, and quantifiers like universal ("for all") and existential ("there exists") to express the extent to which a predicate is true. Examples are provided to demonstrate how predicates and quantifiers can be used to represent statements and enable logical reasoning. The document also covers translating statements between natural language and predicate logic, and negating quantified statements.
This document summarizes Chapter 1 from the book "Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications" by Kenneth H. Rosen. The chapter introduces propositional logic and proofs. It defines basic logical concepts like propositions, truth tables, logical operators, and equivalence rules. It also covers predicates, quantifiers, and rules of inference for constructing logical arguments. The goal is to explain what constitutes a valid mathematical argument and provide tools for building proofs.
This document provides an overview of first-order logic including:
- First-order logic is a formal system used in mathematics, philosophy, linguistics and computer science to represent knowledge.
- It models the world in terms of objects, properties, relations and functions.
- The syntax of first-order logic includes constant symbols, function symbols, predicate symbols, variables, and connectives like not, and, or as well as quantifiers like universal and existential.
- Examples show how first-order logic can represent statements about individuals and their relationships using predicates, terms, atomic and complex sentences with quantifiers.
The document discusses knowledge representation using propositional logic and predicate logic. It begins by explaining the syntax and semantics of propositional logic for representing problems as logical theorems to prove. Predicate logic is then introduced as being more versatile than propositional logic for representing knowledge, as it allows quantifiers and relations between objects. Examples are provided to demonstrate how predicate logic can formally represent statements involving universal and existential quantification.
Prolog approximates first-order logic and represents programs as sets of Horn clauses. It performs inference through resolution and searches for solutions through backtracking with unification. Prolog can represent semantic networks and frames to describe relationships between objects, classes, and their properties. It can also perform depth-first search on graphs to find paths between nodes. However, Prolog has limitations in representing higher-order relationships and probabilities.
Here is a proof of this statement using resolution refutation:
1. ∀x∀y(F(x) ∧ F(y) ∧ L(x,y)) → S(x,y) (Premise: Any fish larger can swim faster)
2. ∃x∀y(F(y) → L(x,y)) (Premise: There exists a largest fish)
3. ∃x∀y(F(y) → S(x,y)) (Goal: There exists a fastest fish)
4. F(a) ∧ F(b) ∧ L(a,b) → S(a
1. This document provides an overview of key probability and statistics concepts covered on actuarial exams P and FM.
2. It covers topics like probability spaces, random variables, expectations, distributions, and functions including CDFs, PDFs, moments, and transformations.
3. Formulas and properties are presented for concepts like independence, conditional probability, multivariate distributions, the central limit theorem, and more.
This document provides an overview of logic programming and the logic programming language Prolog. It discusses key concepts in logic programming like predicates, clauses, resolution, and backward chaining. It also describes the basic syntax and execution model of Prolog, including how it uses unification, backtracking, and trace to evaluate queries against a knowledge base of facts and rules.
The document discusses predicate logic, which extends propositional logic to permit reasoning about classes of entities through the use of predicates and variables. Predicate logic uses predicates that relate variables to form propositions, and quantifiers like "for all" and "there exists" to specify whether predicates apply to all or some members of a universe of discourse. Well-formed formulas in predicate logic contain quantified variables and avoid free variables to form unambiguous propositions.
The document discusses predicate logic, which extends propositional logic to permit reasoning about classes of entities through the use of predicates and variables. Predicate logic uses predicates that relate variables to form propositions, and quantifiers like "for all" and "there exists" to specify whether predicates apply to all or some members of a universe of discourse. Well-formed formulas in predicate logic contain quantified variables and avoid free variables to form unambiguous propositions.
To summarize the key steps for factoring polynomials:
1. Determine possible integer roots by finding the divisors of the constant term.
2. Use the remainder theorem or Ruffini's rule to check if an integer is a root by dividing the polynomial by (x - a) and checking if the remainder is zero.
3. Integer roots that produce a zero remainder are factors of the polynomial. Repeating this process allows one to fully factor the polynomial into linear terms.
The International Journal of Engineering & Science is aimed at providing a platform for researchers, engineers, scientists, or educators to publish their original research results, to exchange new ideas, to disseminate information in innovative designs, engineering experiences and technological skills. It is also the Journal's objective to promote engineering and technology education. All papers submitted to the Journal will be blind peer-reviewed. Only original articles will be published.
The papers for publication in The International Journal of Engineering& Science are selected through rigorous peer reviews to ensure originality, timeliness, relevance, and readability.
Theoretical work submitted to the Journal should be original in its motivation or modeling structure. Empirical analysis should be based on a theoretical framework and should be capable of replication. It is expected that all materials required for replication (including computer programs and data sets) should be available upon request to the authors.
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
More Related Content
Similar to dfgsdfdsgdfgfdgdrgdfgffdhyrthfgnhgjhgdfs.ppt
This document provides an overview of predicate logic, including:
- The basic components of predicate logic like variables, predicates, quantifiers, and propositional functions
- Explanations of the universal and existential quantifiers
- How to negate quantified expressions using De Morgan's laws
- Examples of translating statements between English and predicate logic
Fuzzy logic was introduced by Lotfi Zadeh in 1965 to address problems with classical logic being too precise. Fuzzy logic allows for truth values between 0 and 1 rather than binary true/false. It involves fuzzy sets, membership functions, linguistic variables, and fuzzy rules. Fuzzy logic can be applied to knowledge representation and inference using concepts like fuzzy predicates, relations, modifiers and quantifiers. It has various applications including household appliances, animation, industrial automation, and more.
1) Propositional functions are propositions that contain variables and have no truth value until the variables are assigned values or quantified.
2) Quantifiers like "for all" (universal quantification) and "there exists" (existential quantification) are used to bind variables and give propositional functions truth values.
3) Quantification can be thought of as nested loops over variables, with universal quantification checking for truth at each value and existential checking for at least one true value.
This document provides an introduction to predicate logic and quantifiers. It begins with terminology like propositional functions, arguments, and universe of discourse. It then defines and provides examples of quantifiers like universal and existential quantifiers. It discusses how to mix quantifiers and their truth values. It also covers binding variables, scope, and negation of quantified statements. Finally, it provides a brief introduction to Prolog, a logic programming language based on predicate logic.
This document discusses predicates and quantifiers in predicate logic. It begins by explaining the limitations of propositional logic in expressing statements involving variables and relationships between objects. It then introduces predicates as statements involving variables, and quantifiers like universal ("for all") and existential ("there exists") to express the extent to which a predicate is true. Examples are provided to demonstrate how predicates and quantifiers can be used to represent statements and enable logical reasoning. The document also covers translating statements between natural language and predicate logic, and negating quantified statements.
This document summarizes Chapter 1 from the book "Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications" by Kenneth H. Rosen. The chapter introduces propositional logic and proofs. It defines basic logical concepts like propositions, truth tables, logical operators, and equivalence rules. It also covers predicates, quantifiers, and rules of inference for constructing logical arguments. The goal is to explain what constitutes a valid mathematical argument and provide tools for building proofs.
This document provides an overview of first-order logic including:
- First-order logic is a formal system used in mathematics, philosophy, linguistics and computer science to represent knowledge.
- It models the world in terms of objects, properties, relations and functions.
- The syntax of first-order logic includes constant symbols, function symbols, predicate symbols, variables, and connectives like not, and, or as well as quantifiers like universal and existential.
- Examples show how first-order logic can represent statements about individuals and their relationships using predicates, terms, atomic and complex sentences with quantifiers.
The document discusses knowledge representation using propositional logic and predicate logic. It begins by explaining the syntax and semantics of propositional logic for representing problems as logical theorems to prove. Predicate logic is then introduced as being more versatile than propositional logic for representing knowledge, as it allows quantifiers and relations between objects. Examples are provided to demonstrate how predicate logic can formally represent statements involving universal and existential quantification.
Prolog approximates first-order logic and represents programs as sets of Horn clauses. It performs inference through resolution and searches for solutions through backtracking with unification. Prolog can represent semantic networks and frames to describe relationships between objects, classes, and their properties. It can also perform depth-first search on graphs to find paths between nodes. However, Prolog has limitations in representing higher-order relationships and probabilities.
Here is a proof of this statement using resolution refutation:
1. ∀x∀y(F(x) ∧ F(y) ∧ L(x,y)) → S(x,y) (Premise: Any fish larger can swim faster)
2. ∃x∀y(F(y) → L(x,y)) (Premise: There exists a largest fish)
3. ∃x∀y(F(y) → S(x,y)) (Goal: There exists a fastest fish)
4. F(a) ∧ F(b) ∧ L(a,b) → S(a
1. This document provides an overview of key probability and statistics concepts covered on actuarial exams P and FM.
2. It covers topics like probability spaces, random variables, expectations, distributions, and functions including CDFs, PDFs, moments, and transformations.
3. Formulas and properties are presented for concepts like independence, conditional probability, multivariate distributions, the central limit theorem, and more.
This document provides an overview of logic programming and the logic programming language Prolog. It discusses key concepts in logic programming like predicates, clauses, resolution, and backward chaining. It also describes the basic syntax and execution model of Prolog, including how it uses unification, backtracking, and trace to evaluate queries against a knowledge base of facts and rules.
The document discusses predicate logic, which extends propositional logic to permit reasoning about classes of entities through the use of predicates and variables. Predicate logic uses predicates that relate variables to form propositions, and quantifiers like "for all" and "there exists" to specify whether predicates apply to all or some members of a universe of discourse. Well-formed formulas in predicate logic contain quantified variables and avoid free variables to form unambiguous propositions.
The document discusses predicate logic, which extends propositional logic to permit reasoning about classes of entities through the use of predicates and variables. Predicate logic uses predicates that relate variables to form propositions, and quantifiers like "for all" and "there exists" to specify whether predicates apply to all or some members of a universe of discourse. Well-formed formulas in predicate logic contain quantified variables and avoid free variables to form unambiguous propositions.
To summarize the key steps for factoring polynomials:
1. Determine possible integer roots by finding the divisors of the constant term.
2. Use the remainder theorem or Ruffini's rule to check if an integer is a root by dividing the polynomial by (x - a) and checking if the remainder is zero.
3. Integer roots that produce a zero remainder are factors of the polynomial. Repeating this process allows one to fully factor the polynomial into linear terms.
The International Journal of Engineering & Science is aimed at providing a platform for researchers, engineers, scientists, or educators to publish their original research results, to exchange new ideas, to disseminate information in innovative designs, engineering experiences and technological skills. It is also the Journal's objective to promote engineering and technology education. All papers submitted to the Journal will be blind peer-reviewed. Only original articles will be published.
The papers for publication in The International Journal of Engineering& Science are selected through rigorous peer reviews to ensure originality, timeliness, relevance, and readability.
Theoretical work submitted to the Journal should be original in its motivation or modeling structure. Empirical analysis should be based on a theoretical framework and should be capable of replication. It is expected that all materials required for replication (including computer programs and data sets) should be available upon request to the authors.
Similar to dfgsdfdsgdfgfdgdrgdfgffdhyrthfgnhgjhgdfs.ppt (20)
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths ForwardLeonel Morgado
We will metaverse into the essence of immersive learning, into its three dimensions and conceptual models. This approach encompasses elements from teaching methodologies to social involvement, through organizational concerns and technologies. Challenging the perception of learning as knowledge transfer, we introduce a 'Uses, Practices & Strategies' model operationalized by the 'Immersive Learning Brain' and ‘Immersion Cube’ frameworks. This approach offers a comprehensive guide through the intricacies of immersive educational experiences and spotlighting research frontiers, along the immersion dimensions of system, narrative, and agency. Our discourse extends to stakeholders beyond the academic sphere, addressing the interests of technologists, instructional designers, and policymakers. We span various contexts, from formal education to organizational transformation to the new horizon of an AI-pervasive society. This keynote aims to unite the iLRN community in a collaborative journey towards a future where immersive learning research and practice coalesce, paving the way for innovative educational research and practice landscapes.
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...Leonel Morgado
Current descriptions of immersive learning cases are often difficult or impossible to compare. This is due to a myriad of different options on what details to include, which aspects are relevant, and on the descriptive approaches employed. Also, these aspects often combine very specific details with more general guidelines or indicate intents and rationales without clarifying their implementation. In this paper we provide a method to describe immersive learning cases that is structured to enable comparisons, yet flexible enough to allow researchers and practitioners to decide which aspects to include. This method leverages a taxonomy that classifies educational aspects at three levels (uses, practices, and strategies) and then utilizes two frameworks, the Immersive Learning Brain and the Immersion Cube, to enable a structured description and interpretation of immersive learning cases. The method is then demonstrated on a published immersive learning case on training for wind turbine maintenance using virtual reality. Applying the method results in a structured artifact, the Immersive Learning Case Sheet, that tags the case with its proximal uses, practices, and strategies, and refines the free text case description to ensure that matching details are included. This contribution is thus a case description method in support of future comparative research of immersive learning cases. We then discuss how the resulting description and interpretation can be leveraged to change immersion learning cases, by enriching them (considering low-effort changes or additions) or innovating (exploring more challenging avenues of transformation). The method holds significant promise to support better-grounded research in immersive learning.
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...AbdullaAlAsif1
The pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys colletei, is known for its viviparous nature, this presents an intriguing case of relatively low fecundity, raising questions about potential compensatory reproductive strategies employed by this species. Our study delves into the examination of fecundity and the Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) in the Pygmy Halfbeak, D. colletei (Meisner, 2001), an intriguing viviparous fish indigenous to Sarawak, Borneo. We hypothesize that the Pygmy halfbeak, D. colletei, may exhibit unique reproductive adaptations to offset its low fecundity, thus enhancing its survival and fitness. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive study utilizing 28 mature female specimens of D. colletei, carefully measuring fecundity and GSI to shed light on the reproductive adaptations of this species. Our findings reveal that D. colletei indeed exhibits low fecundity, with a mean of 16.76 ± 2.01, and a mean GSI of 12.83 ± 1.27, providing crucial insights into the reproductive mechanisms at play in this species. These results underscore the existence of unique reproductive strategies in D. colletei, enabling its adaptation and persistence in Borneo's diverse aquatic ecosystems, and call for further ecological research to elucidate these mechanisms. This study lends to a better understanding of viviparous fish in Borneo and contributes to the broader field of aquatic ecology, enhancing our knowledge of species adaptations to unique ecological challenges.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...Leonel Morgado
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
Or: Beyond linear.
Abstract: Equivariant neural networks are neural networks that incorporate symmetries. The nonlinear activation functions in these networks result in interesting nonlinear equivariant maps between simple representations, and motivate the key player of this talk: piecewise linear representation theory.
Disclaimer: No one is perfect, so please mind that there might be mistakes and typos.
dtubbenhauer@gmail.com
Corrected slides: dtubbenhauer.com/talks.html
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
The technology uses reclaimed CO₂ as the dyeing medium in a closed loop process. When pressurized, CO₂ becomes supercritical (SC-CO₂). In this state CO₂ has a very high solvent power, allowing the dye to dissolve easily.
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...Sérgio Sacani
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
2. First Order (Predicate) Logic (FOL)
• First-order logic is used to model the world in terms of
– objects which are things with individual identities
e.g., individual students, lecturers, companies, cars ...
– properties of objects that distinguish them from other objects
e.g., mortal, blue, oval, even, large, ...
– classes of objects (often defined by properties)
e.g., human, mammal, machine, ...
– relations that hold among objects
e.g., brother of, bigger than, outside, part of, has color, occurs
after, owns, a member of, ...
– functions which are a subset of the relations in which there is
only one ``value'' for any given ``input''.
e.g., father of, best friend, second half, one more than ...
3. Syntax of FOL
• Predicates: P(x[1], ..., x[n])
• P: predicate name;
• (x[1], ..., x[n]): argument list
– A special function with range = {T, F};
– Examples:
human(x), /* x is a human */
father(x, y) /* x is the father of y */
– When all arguments of a predicate is assigned values (said to be
instantiated), the predicate becomes either true or false, i.e., it
becomes a proposition. Ex. Father(Fred, Joe)
– A predicate, like a membership function, defines a set (or a class) of
4. • Terms (arguments of predicates must be terms)
– Constants are terms (e.g., Fred, a, Z, “red”, etc.)
– Variables are terms (e.g., x, y, z, etc.), a variable is
instantiated when it is assigned a constant as its value
– Functions of terms are terms (e.g., f(x, y, z), f(x, g(a)), etc.)
– A term is called a ground term if it does not involve variables
– Predicates, though special functions, are not terms in FOL
5. • Quantifiers
Universal quantification (or forall)
– (x)P(x) means that P holds for all values of x in the
domain associated with that variable.
– E.g., (x) dolphin(x) => mammal(x)
(x) human(x) => mortal(x)
– Universal quantifiers often used with "implication (=>)" to
form "rules" about properties of a class
(x) student(x) => smart(x) (All students are smart)
– Often associated with English words “all”, “everyone”,
“always”, etc.
– You rarely use universal quantification to make blanket
statements about every individual in the world (because
such statement is hardly true)
(x)student(x)^smart(x) means everyone in the world is a
student and is smart.
6. Existential quantification
– (x)P(x) means that P holds for some value(s) of x in the domain
associated with that variable.
– E.g., (x) mammal(x) ^ lays-eggs(x)
(x) taller(x, Fred)
(x) UMBC-Student (x) ^ taller(x, Fred)
– Existential quantifiers usually used with “^ (and)" to specify a list
of properties about an individual.
(x) student(x) ^ smart(x) (there is a student who is smart.)
– A common mistake is to represent this English sentence as the
FOL sentence:
(x) student(x) => smart(x)
It also holds if there no student exists in the domain because
student(x) => smart(x) holds for any individual who is not a
student.
– Often associated with English words “someone”, “sometimes”, etc.
7. Scopes of quantifiers
• Each quantified variable has its scope
– (x)[human(x) => (y) [human(y) ^ father(y, x)]
– All occurrences of x within the scope of the quantified x refer to the
same thing.
– Use different variables for different things
• Switching the order of universal quantifiers does not change the
meaning:
– (x)(y)P(x,y) <=> (y)(x)P(x,y), can write as (x,y)P(x,y)
• Similarly, you can switch the order of existential quantifiers.
– (x)(y)P(x,y) <=> (y)(x)P(x,y)
• Switching the order of universals and existential does change
meaning:
– Everyone likes someone: (x)(y)likes(x,y)
– Someone is liked by everyone: (y)(x) likes(x,y)
8. Sentences are built from terms and atoms
• A term (denoting a individual in the world) is a constant symbol,
a variable symbol, or a function of terms.
• An atom (atomic sentence) is a predicate P(x[1], ..., x[n])
– Ground atom: all terms in its arguments are ground terms (does not
involve variables)
– A ground atom has value true or false (like a proposition in PL)
• A literal is either an atom or a negation of an atom
• A sentence is an atom, or,
– ~P, P v Q, P ^ Q, P => Q, P <=> Q, (P) where P and Q are sentences
– If P is a sentence and x is a variable, then (x)P and (x)P are
sentences
• A well-formed formula (wff) is a sentence containing no "free"
variables. i.e., all variables are "bound" by universal or existential
quantifiers.
(x)P(x,y) has x bound as a universally quantified variable, but y is
free.
10. Translating English to FOL
• Every gardener likes the sun.
(x) gardener(x) => likes(x,Sun)
• Not Every gardener likes the sun.
~((x) gardener(x) => likes(x,Sun))
• You can fool some of the people all of the time.
(x)(t) person(x) ^ time(t) => can-be-fooled(x,t)
• You can fool all of the people some of the time.
(x)(t) person(x) ^ time(t) => can-be-fooled(x,t)
(the time people are fooled may be different)
• You can fool all of the people at some time.
(t)(x) person(x) ^ time(t) => can-be-fooled(x,t)
(all people are fooled at the same time)
• You can not fool all of the people all of the time.
~((x)(t) person(x) ^ time(t) => can-be-fooled(x,t))
• Everyone is younger than his father
(x) person(x) => younger(x, father(x))
11. • All purple mushrooms are poisonous.
(x) (mushroom(x) ^ purple(x)) => poisonous(x)
• No purple mushroom is poisonous.
~(x) purple(x) ^ mushroom(x) ^ poisonous(x)
(x) (mushroom(x) ^ purple(x)) => ~poisonous(x)
• There are exactly two purple mushrooms.
(x)(Ey) mushroom(x) ^ purple(x) ^ mushroom(y) ^ purple(y) ^
~(x=y) ^
(z) (mushroom(z) ^ purple(z)) => ((x=z) v (y=z))
• Clinton is not tall.
~tall(Clinton)
• X is above Y if X is directly on top of Y or there is a pile
of one or more other objects directly on top of one
another starting with X and ending with Y.
(x)(y) above(x,y) <=> (on(x,y) v (z) (on(x,z) ^ above(z,y)))
12. Example: A simple genealogy KB by FOL
• Build a small genealogy knowledge base by FOL that
– contains facts of immediate family relations (spouses, parents, etc.)
– contains definitions of more complex relations (ancestors, relatives)
– is able to answer queries about relationships between people
• Predicates:
– parent(x, y), child (x, y), father(x, y), daughter(x, y), etc.
– spouse(x, y), husband(x, y), wife(x,y)
– ancestor(x, y), descendent(x, y)
– relative(x, y)
• Facts:
– husband(Joe, Mary), son(Fred, Joe)
– spouse(John, Nancy), male(John), son(Mark, Nancy)
– father(Jack, Nancy), daughter(Linda, Jack)
– daughter(Liz, Linda)
– etc.
13. • Rules for genealogical relations
– (x,y) parent(x, y) <=> child (y, x)
(x,y) father(x, y) <=> parent(x, y) ^ male(x) (similarly for mother(x, y))
(x,y) daughter(x, y) <=> child(x, y) ^ female(x) (similarly for son(x, y))
– (x,y) husband(x, y) <=> spouse(x, y) ^ male(x) (similarly for wife(x, y))
(x,y) spouse(x, y) <=> spouse(y, x) (spouse relation is symmetric)
– (x,y) parent(x, y) => ancestor(x, y)
(x,y)(z) parent(x, z) ^ ancestor(z, y) => ancestor(x, y)
– (x,y) descendent(x, y) <=> ancestor(y, x)
– (x,y)(z) ancestor(z, x) ^ ancestor(z, y) => relative(x, y)
(related by common ancestry)
(x,y) spouse(x, y) => relative(x, y) (related by marriage)
(x,y)(z) relative(z, x) ^ relative(z, y) => relative(x, y) (transitive)
(x,y) relative(x, y) => relative(y, x) (symmetric)
• Queries
– ancestor(Jack, Fred) /* the answer is yes */
– relative(Liz, Joe) /* the answer is yes */
– relative(Nancy, Mathews)
/* no answer in general, no if under closed world assumption */
14. Connections between Forall and Exists
• “It is not the case that everyone is ...” is logically
equivalent to “There is someone who is NOT ...”
• “No one is ...” is logically equivalent to “All people
are NOT ...”
• We can relate sentences involving forall and exists
using De Morgan’s laws:
~(x)P(x) <=> (x) ~P(x)
~(x) P(x) <=> (x) ~P(x)
(x) P(x) <=> ~(x) ~P(x)
(x) P(x) <=> ~ (x) ~P(x)
• Example: no one likes everyone
– ~ (x)(y)likes(x,y)
– (x)(y)~likes(x,y)
15. Semantics of FOL
• Domain M: the set of all objects in the world (of interest)
• Interpretation I: includes
– Assign each constant to an object in M
– Define each function of n arguments as a mapping M^n => M
– Define each predicate of n arguments as a mapping M^n => {T, F}
– Therefore, every ground predicate with any instantiation will have a
truth value
– In general there are infinite number of interpretations because |M| is
infinite
• Define of logical connectives: ~, ^, v, =>, <=> as in PL
• Define semantics of (x) and (x)
– (x) P(x) is true iff P(x) is true under all interpretations
– (x) P(x) is true iff P(x) is true under some interpretation
16. • Model: an interpretation of a set of sentences such that every
sentence is True
• A sentence is
– satisfiable if it is true under some interpretation
– valid if it is true under all possible interpretations
– inconsistent if there does not exist any interpretation under which the
sentence is true
• logical consequence: S |= X if all models of S are also models of
X
17. Axioms, definitions and theorems
•Axioms are facts and rules which are known (or assumed) to
be true facts and concepts about a domain.
–Mathematicians don't want any unnecessary (dependent) axioms
-- ones that can be derived from other axioms.
–Dependent axioms can make reasoning faster, however.
–Choosing a good set of axioms for a domain is a kind of design
problem.
•A definition of a predicate is of the form “P(x) <=> S(x)”
(define P(x) by S(x)) and can be decomposed into two parts
–Necessary description: “P(x) => S(x)” (only if)
–Sufficient description “P(x) <= S(x)” (if)
–Some concepts don’t have complete definitions (e.g. person(x))
•A theorem S is a sentence that logically follows the axiom
set A, i.e. A |= S.
18. Higher order logic
• FOL only allows to quantify over variables, and variables
can only range over objects.
• HOL allows us to quantify over relations
• Example: (quantify over functions)
“two functions are equal iff they produce the same value for all
arguments”
f g (f = g) <=> (x f(x) = g(x))
• Example: (quantify over predicates)
r transitive( r ) => (xyz) r(x,y) ^ r(y,z) => r(x,z))
• More expressive, but undecidable.
19. Representing Change
• Representing change in the world in logic can be
tricky.
• One way is to change the KB
– add and delete sentences from the KB to reflect changes.
– How do we remember the past, or reason about changes?
• Situation calculus is another way
• A situation is a snapshot of the world at some
instant in time
• When the agent performs an action A
in situation S1, the result is a new
situation S2.
20. Situation Calculus
• A situation is a snapshot of the world at an interval of time when
nothing changes
• Every true or false statement is made with respect to a particular
situation.
– Add situation variables to every predicate. E.g., feel(x, hungry)
becomes feel(x, hungry, s0) to mean that feel(x, hungry) is true in
situation (i.e., state) s0.
– Or, add a special predicate holds(f,s) that means "f is true in
situation s.” e.g., holds(feel(x, hungry), s0)
• Add a new special function called result(a,s) that maps current
situation s into a new situation as a result of performing action a. For
example, result(eating, s) is a function that returns the successor state
in which x is no longer hungry
• Example: The action of eating could be represented by
• (x)(s)(feel(x, hungry, s) => feel(x, not-hungry,result(eating(x),s))
21. Frame problem
• An action in situation calculus only changes a small portion of
the current situation
– after eating, x is not-hungry, but many other properties related to x
(e.g., his height, his relations to others such as his parents) are not
change
– Many other things unrelated to x’s feeling are not changed
• Explicit copy those unchanged facts/relations from the current
state to the new state after each action is inefficient (and
counterintuitive)
• How to represent facts/relations that remain unchanged by
certain actions is known as “frame problem”, a very tough
problem in AI
• One way to address this problem is to add frame axioms.
– (x,s1,s2)P(x, s1)^s2=result(a(s1)) =>P(x, s2)
• We may need a huge number of frame axioms
22. More on definitions
• A definition of P(x) by S(x)), denoted (x) P(x) <=> S(x), can be
decomposed into two parts
– Necessary description: “P(x) => S(x)” (only if, for P(x) being true,
S(x) is necessarily true)
– Sufficient description “P(x) <= S(x)” (if, S(x) being true is sufficient
to make P(x) true)
• Examples: define father(x, y) by parent(x, y) and male(x)
– parent(x, y) is a necessary (but not sufficient ) description of
father(x, y)
father(x, y) => parent(x, y), parent(x, y) => father(x, y)
– parent(x, y) ^ male(x) is a necessary and sufficient description of
father(x, y)
parent(x, y) ^ male(x) <=> father(x, y)
– parent(x, y) ^ male(x) ^ age(x, 35) is a sufficient (but not necessary)
description of father(x, y) because
father(x, y) => parent(x, y) ^ male(x) ^ age(x, 35)
23. More on definitions
P(x)
S(x)
S(x) is a
necessary
condition of P(x)
(x) P(x) => S(x)
S(x)
P(x)
S(x) is a
sufficient
condition of P(x)
(x) P(x) <= S(x)
P(x)
S(x)
S(x) is a
necessary and
sufficient
condition of P(x)
(x) P(x) <=> S(x)