DE（発展的評価）に関するWebinarの資料です。

1. - 0 1 : rD 8
23 - -
8 0 1
:
b 3
E
b 2 E 2 ie
a
9 W
n E 4 E

2. •
•
•
•
•
•
2

3. •
•
•
•
–
–
–
3

4. 4
Copyright: All Rights Reserved
Copyleft: All Rights Reversed

5. 5
…
DE

6. 6

7. 7

8. 9 1/ 6
8

9. 9
Getting to Maybe

10. 10
DE 2017.8.24

11. 11

12. 12
Evaluation “by the people and for the people.”

13. 13
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
(p.40

14. Kate
McKegg
Kataraina
Pipi
Nan
Weihipeihana
Andy Rafael
Johnson
Nora
Murphy
Johnson

15. DE for Social Justice Purpose
Illuminates, informs and supports what is being developed and
how it addresses the root causes of systemic inequities, identifying
the implications and consequences of what is being developed.
3/8/2019

16. These principles guide the way we work with each other, partners, and
communities.
Social Justice
Work vigorously towards social justice by shining the light on systems as they
actually are, troubling power dynamics, creating meaningful opportunities for
people to contribute, be heard, experience wellbeing, and shape the decisions
that impact them.
Undivided Selves
Embrace our humanity by honoring and engaging the whole person, including
hearts, minds, bodies, and spirits, as well as our stories, histories, cultures, and
values.
Connectedness
Make explicit and nurture our connections to each other, the air, land, and sea.
3/8/2019

17. Community Facing
Recognize and create space for the deep wisdom and important ways of knowing
that exist in community about themselves, their lives, and their values,
irrespective of their titles, training, awards, or social/political station and power.
Artistic Expression
Create opportunities to express our hopes, fears, and values and to critique the
world through the arts, with humor, compassion, inspiration, and love.
Loving Relationships
Support loving relationships characterized by nurturing one’s own and others’
spiritual growth, revealed through acts of care, respect, knowing, and assuming
responsibility.
Generosity of Spirit
Relate to ourselves and each other with generosity, empathy, and a kind heart.
Meeting people where they are at without judgment, creating opportunities for
reconciliation, healing, and forgiveness.
3/8/2019

18. 18

19. 19
https://www.utilization-focusedevaluation.org/blue-marble-evaluation

20. 20

21. 21

22. 22
Objective 1: To use the transformative power of evaluative practice to understand and
help enable the changes sought towards rapid achievement of the SDGs and other
relevant international goals. We are especially interested in understanding the evaluation
of large systems change (see also here) and global systems change (see also here) as a
means to energize, stimulate and open up new pathways for learning, acting and
reflecting.

23. 23
Zenda Ofir
SDGs
DE DE

24. 24
2018
7000

25. 25
E. Common Good and Equity: Evaluators strive to contribute to the
common good and advancement of an equitable and just society.
E1. Recognize and balance the interests of the client, other
stakeholders, and the common good while also protecting the
integrity of the evaluation.
E2. Identify and make efforts to address the evaluation's potential
threats to the common good especially when specific stakeholder
interests conflict with the goals of a democratic, equitable, and just
society.
E3. Identify and make efforts to address the evaluation's potential
risks of exacerbating historic disadvantage or inequity.
E4. Promote transparency and active sharing of data and findings
with the goal of equitable access to information in forms that
respect people and honor promises of confidentiality.
E5. Mitigate the bias and potential power imbalances that can occur
as a result of the evaluation's context. Self-assess one's own privilege
and positioning within that context.

26. 26

27. 27
Webinar
VS

28. 28
SDGs

29. 29
p.254
2018

30. 30

31. 31

32. 32

33. 33
To have values or not to have values: the question is always
with us. When sociologists undertake to study problems that
have relevance to the world we live in, they find themselves
caught in a crossfire. Some urge them not to take sides, to be
neutral and do research the is technically correct and value
free. Others tell them their work is shallow and useless if it
does not express a deep commitment to a value position.
This dilemma, which seems so painful to so many, actually
does not exist…
The question is not whether we should take sides, since we
inevitably will, but rather whose side are we on?
(Howard Becker, 1967, p. 239).
https://www.sfu.ca/~palys/Becker1967-WhoseSideAreWeOn.pdf

34. 34
ud y W h
o u W
n a e ud g u
n ʼ
r .
ʼi w
r t
ud g W n
ud

35. 35

36. 36

37. 37
Jennifer Greene
https://education.illinois.edu/faculty/jennifer-greene
Mixed
Methods in Social Inquiry (Jossey-Bass, 2007 )
DE

38. , 1: C , 1: 1 :2 ( :
: 1 : A 1 21 ) 11 1
1 1 ,
38
E A E A A
E A A A: , 1 1 : :
: 1 A : 1 1 : : 00 1 1 :
E A A A E
A : A
skcsw i sct xr ] Vc d V f c b
T M J skco infhcd sw d V sc
pm N c fa cvqaySh L
, A A A : : : 1 : 2:
E : 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 A 01 1
1 A: A E A
. I A E A G E
A A
A A J
sk e lucsw i TgYea
R [bL
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8ad5/c08e5870f7da584401984b225b1e77268506.pdf
a d G

39. 39

40. Social Justice
Work vigorously towards social justice by shining the light on
systems as they actually are, troubling power dynamics, creating
meaningful opportunities for people to contribute, be heard,
experience wellbeing, and shape the decisions that impact them.
DE for Social Justice Purpose
Illuminates, informs and supports what is being developed and
how it addresses the root causes of systemic inequities, identifying
the implications and consequences of what is being developed.

41. 41
al E c e
D o
i I S E
• Shin(e) the light on systems as they actually are
• Illuminates, informs and supports what is being developed
• Identify the implications and consequences of what is
being developed.
i E i J
D D D

42. 42

43. Social Justice
Work vigorously towards social justice by shining the light on
systems as they actually are, troubling power dynamics, creating
meaningful opportunities for people to contribute, be heard,
experience wellbeing, and shape the decisions that impact them.
DE for Social Justice Purpose
Illuminates, informs and supports what is being developed and
how it addresses the root causes of systemic inequities, identifying
the implications and consequences of what is being developed.

44. 44
• Creat(e) meaningful opportuni2es for people to
contribute, be heard, experience wellbeing, and shape the
decisions that impact them
• Addresses the root causes of systemic inequi2es
Democratic Evaluation Jennifer Greene
•
•
↓
• inclusion equity
Helen Simons and Jennifer Greene, “Democratic Evaluation and Care Ethics, in Visse and
Abma (eds), 2018, Evaluation for a Caring Society, Information Age Publishing, Inc. p.87, p.90)

45. 45https://togetter.com/li/934412

46. 46
E. Common Good and Equity: Evaluators strive to contribute to the
common good and advancement of an equitable and just society.
E1. Recognize and balance the interests of the client, other
stakeholders, and the common good while also protecting the
integrity of the evaluation.
E2. Identify and make efforts to address the evaluation's potential
threats to the common good especially when specific stakeholder
interests conflict with the goals of a democratic, equitable, and just
society.
E3. Identify and make efforts to address the evaluation's potential
risks of exacerbating historic disadvantage or inequity.
E4. Promote transparency and active sharing of data and findings
with the goal of equitable access to information in forms that
respect people and honor promises of confidentiality.
E5. Mitigate the bias and potential power imbalances that can occur
as a result of the evaluation's context. Self-assess one's own privilege
and positioning within that context.

47. 47
E Ef
The Evil of
Banality: On the Life and Death
Importance of Thinking (Rowman &
Littlefield, 2017
a
Michael Quinn Patton,
On the Life and Death Importance of
Thinking, American Journal of
Evaluation, 2019 Vo. 40(I), 137-146
EDEI c b
E
M E E e E

48. 48
a T
Anything can be done thoughtlessly
M b e lg
E
v s M n t T
n t f T y M f
T B bd E M
u i h acd Me
o T

49. 49
E T E
a
E E
E

50. 50
Equitable
Webinar

51. 51

52. •
•
52

53. 53
n
S S M S
M I
S M S
n
l v G
v C
ui
aOuDn
ve u
E vS t
P ilt
N t
u mp
aOv
v
ilt
aO
/
uDn t
ilt no
v ilt