Feed Resources for Animals in Asia: Issues, Strategies for Use, Intensificati...copppldsecretariat
The availability and efficient use of the feed resources in Asia are the primary drivers of performance to maximise
productivity from animals. Feed security is fundamental to the management, extent of use, conservation and intensification for
productivity enhancement. The awesome reality is that current supplies of animal proteins are inadequate to meet human requirements in
the face of rapidly depleting resources: arable land, water, fossil fuels, nitrogenous and other fertilisers, and decreased supplies of cereal
grains. The contribution of the ruminant sector lags well behind that of non-ruminant pigs and poultry. It is compelling therefore to shift
priority for the development of ruminants (buffaloes, cattle, goats and sheep) in key agro-ecological zones (AEZs), making intensive use
of the available biomass from the forage resources, crop residues, agro-industrial by-products (AIBP) and other non-conventional feed
resources (NCFR). Definitions are given of successful and failed projects on feed resource use. These were used to analyse 12 case
studies, which indicated the value of strong participatory efforts with farmers, empowerment, and the benefits from animals of
productivity-enhancing technologies and integrated natural resource management (NRM). However, wider replication and scaling up
were inadequate in project formulation, including systems methodologies that promoted technology adoption. There was overwhelming
emphasis on component technology applications that were duplicated across countries, often wasteful, the results and relevance of which
were not clear. Technology delivery via the traditional model of research-extension linkage was also inadequate, and needs to be
expanded to participatory research-extension-farmer linkages to accelerate diffusion of technologies, wider adoption and impacts. Other
major limitations concerned with feed resource use are failure to view this issue from a farming systems perspective, strong disciplinary
bias, and poor links to real farm situations. It is suggested that improved efficiency in feed resource use and increased productivity from
animals in the future needs to be cognisant of nine strategies. These include priorities for feed resource use; promoting intensive use of
crop residues; intensification of integrated ruminant-oil palm systems and use of oil palm by-products; priority for urgent, wider
technology application, adoption and scaling up; rigorous application of systems methodologies; development of adaptation and
mitigation options for the effects of climate change on feed resources; strengthening research-extension-farmer linkages; development of
year round feeding systems; and striving for sustainability of integrated farming systems. These strategies together form the challenges
for the future.
[ Originally posted on http://www.cop-ppld.net/cop_knowledge_base ]
Modelling approaches to address crop-residue tradeoffs in mixed crop-livestoc...ILRI
Presentation by Mark T. van Wijk, Mariana C. Rufino and Lieven Claessens (WUR) to the:CGIAR Systemwide Livestock Programme Livestock Policy Group meeting, 1 December 2009
Presented by Shirley Tarawali, Dolapo Enahoro and Catherine Pfeifer (ILRI) at the Expert panel: Food of Animal Origin 2030: Solutions to Consumption Driven Challenges, Global Forum for Food and Agriculture 2018, Berlin, Germany
The Livestock Geo-Wiki: Manure management moduleILRI
Presented by Timothy Robinson at the Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock, 5th Multi-stakeholder Platform Meeting, Cali, Colombia, 7-10 October 2014
Let them eat meat? A solution or or a problem for a sustainable healthy future?ILRI
Presented by Lawrence Haddad (Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition) at the International Tropical Agriculture Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 11−13 November 2019
Animal health and greenhouse gas emissions intensity networkILRI
Presented by Timothy Robinson at the Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock, 5th Multi-stakeholder Platform Meeting, Cali, Colombia, 7-10 October 2014
Feed Resources for Animals in Asia: Issues, Strategies for Use, Intensificati...copppldsecretariat
The availability and efficient use of the feed resources in Asia are the primary drivers of performance to maximise
productivity from animals. Feed security is fundamental to the management, extent of use, conservation and intensification for
productivity enhancement. The awesome reality is that current supplies of animal proteins are inadequate to meet human requirements in
the face of rapidly depleting resources: arable land, water, fossil fuels, nitrogenous and other fertilisers, and decreased supplies of cereal
grains. The contribution of the ruminant sector lags well behind that of non-ruminant pigs and poultry. It is compelling therefore to shift
priority for the development of ruminants (buffaloes, cattle, goats and sheep) in key agro-ecological zones (AEZs), making intensive use
of the available biomass from the forage resources, crop residues, agro-industrial by-products (AIBP) and other non-conventional feed
resources (NCFR). Definitions are given of successful and failed projects on feed resource use. These were used to analyse 12 case
studies, which indicated the value of strong participatory efforts with farmers, empowerment, and the benefits from animals of
productivity-enhancing technologies and integrated natural resource management (NRM). However, wider replication and scaling up
were inadequate in project formulation, including systems methodologies that promoted technology adoption. There was overwhelming
emphasis on component technology applications that were duplicated across countries, often wasteful, the results and relevance of which
were not clear. Technology delivery via the traditional model of research-extension linkage was also inadequate, and needs to be
expanded to participatory research-extension-farmer linkages to accelerate diffusion of technologies, wider adoption and impacts. Other
major limitations concerned with feed resource use are failure to view this issue from a farming systems perspective, strong disciplinary
bias, and poor links to real farm situations. It is suggested that improved efficiency in feed resource use and increased productivity from
animals in the future needs to be cognisant of nine strategies. These include priorities for feed resource use; promoting intensive use of
crop residues; intensification of integrated ruminant-oil palm systems and use of oil palm by-products; priority for urgent, wider
technology application, adoption and scaling up; rigorous application of systems methodologies; development of adaptation and
mitigation options for the effects of climate change on feed resources; strengthening research-extension-farmer linkages; development of
year round feeding systems; and striving for sustainability of integrated farming systems. These strategies together form the challenges
for the future.
[ Originally posted on http://www.cop-ppld.net/cop_knowledge_base ]
Modelling approaches to address crop-residue tradeoffs in mixed crop-livestoc...ILRI
Presentation by Mark T. van Wijk, Mariana C. Rufino and Lieven Claessens (WUR) to the:CGIAR Systemwide Livestock Programme Livestock Policy Group meeting, 1 December 2009
Presented by Shirley Tarawali, Dolapo Enahoro and Catherine Pfeifer (ILRI) at the Expert panel: Food of Animal Origin 2030: Solutions to Consumption Driven Challenges, Global Forum for Food and Agriculture 2018, Berlin, Germany
The Livestock Geo-Wiki: Manure management moduleILRI
Presented by Timothy Robinson at the Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock, 5th Multi-stakeholder Platform Meeting, Cali, Colombia, 7-10 October 2014
Let them eat meat? A solution or or a problem for a sustainable healthy future?ILRI
Presented by Lawrence Haddad (Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition) at the International Tropical Agriculture Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 11−13 November 2019
Animal health and greenhouse gas emissions intensity networkILRI
Presented by Timothy Robinson at the Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock, 5th Multi-stakeholder Platform Meeting, Cali, Colombia, 7-10 October 2014
Livestock, human welfare, and sustainability: The challenge of harmonizing fa...ILRI
Presented by James Hammond, Léo Gorman, Simon Fraval, Mark van Wijk at the 9th Multi-Stakeholder Partnership Meeting of the Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock, Manhattan, Kansas, 9-13 September 2019
Getting Farmers to improve the productivity of ruminants is a key way to improve rural livelihoods and improve food security .Farming systems that are more productive generally reduce enteric methane emissions per unit of animal product
Food Technology: Alternative Protein - Do you know what it is? Can you tell i...Edson Barbosa
Online session presented at SETI 2020 event (Federal University of Lavras) in Brazil this week (Nov, 9th, 2020):
"If I were in your shoes, and judging from the title, I would say at once: "Damn! It has nothing to do with technology." But it really does a lot. The idea behind this talk is to show how our food is also being digitized. And yes, the Digital Transformation is already impacting our "daily rice and beans". This dialogue will be an excellent opportunity to talk about the technologies of Cultivated-Meat, Plant-Based Meat and Fermentation. And yes, the simulation of dairy products will also be part of the menu, I mean, of the conversation. The session aims to tackle the topic in an introductory, consult-oriented, and deviant way to exercise Future Thinking on the topic. After all, we are living in the great moment of "digital symbiosis" between the branch of Biotechnology and IT technologies."
Comments at the FDA Science Board Meeting on Cell-Based Meat David Welch
David Welch, Director of Science and Technology at The Good Food Institute, presents comments on the current state of cell-based meat at the FDA's Science Board meeting on October 22nd, 2018
Environmental footprint of African livestock systems- case studies in KenyaILRI
Presented by Phyllis Ndung’u at the Tropentag 2021―Towards shifting paradigms in agriculture for a healthy and sustainable future, 15-17 September 2021
RDR seminar on ''Understanding Urban and Rural Household Food Consumption in ...IFPRI Africa
To conclude his presentation during the Research and Development Roundtables (RDR), Dr Wim mentioned that Senegal is a clear case of hidden hunger, Urban diet is bigger in size and more diversified than rural diet, which remains largely dominated by cereals and nutrient adequacies are higher in areas known for production of corresponding crops especially for iron and millet, except for vitamin B12 and vitamin A
Alternative proteins could substitute traditional proteins, if production cost can be substantially reduced. Cell-based protein production replicates the processes that occur inside a living animal to produce meat. In precision fermentation, gene-edited microbes can make a wide range of organic molecules, such as protein. Swine and ruminants are more susceptible to disruption than poultry, as their easy-to-substitute mince products make up a higher share of value, while substitution of animal-based proteins also opens up new growth platforms, as growing world population still need proteins, albeit from different sources
Presentation for the International Grains Forum (www.igc.int/en/about/aboutus-pressrelease.aspx, www.igcargentina.com/eng/index.html)
https://globalfutures.cgiar.org/2015/12/20/to-latin-america-for-global-connections
Livestock, human welfare, and sustainability: The challenge of harmonizing fa...ILRI
Presented by James Hammond, Léo Gorman, Simon Fraval, Mark van Wijk at the 9th Multi-Stakeholder Partnership Meeting of the Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock, Manhattan, Kansas, 9-13 September 2019
Getting Farmers to improve the productivity of ruminants is a key way to improve rural livelihoods and improve food security .Farming systems that are more productive generally reduce enteric methane emissions per unit of animal product
Food Technology: Alternative Protein - Do you know what it is? Can you tell i...Edson Barbosa
Online session presented at SETI 2020 event (Federal University of Lavras) in Brazil this week (Nov, 9th, 2020):
"If I were in your shoes, and judging from the title, I would say at once: "Damn! It has nothing to do with technology." But it really does a lot. The idea behind this talk is to show how our food is also being digitized. And yes, the Digital Transformation is already impacting our "daily rice and beans". This dialogue will be an excellent opportunity to talk about the technologies of Cultivated-Meat, Plant-Based Meat and Fermentation. And yes, the simulation of dairy products will also be part of the menu, I mean, of the conversation. The session aims to tackle the topic in an introductory, consult-oriented, and deviant way to exercise Future Thinking on the topic. After all, we are living in the great moment of "digital symbiosis" between the branch of Biotechnology and IT technologies."
Comments at the FDA Science Board Meeting on Cell-Based Meat David Welch
David Welch, Director of Science and Technology at The Good Food Institute, presents comments on the current state of cell-based meat at the FDA's Science Board meeting on October 22nd, 2018
Environmental footprint of African livestock systems- case studies in KenyaILRI
Presented by Phyllis Ndung’u at the Tropentag 2021―Towards shifting paradigms in agriculture for a healthy and sustainable future, 15-17 September 2021
RDR seminar on ''Understanding Urban and Rural Household Food Consumption in ...IFPRI Africa
To conclude his presentation during the Research and Development Roundtables (RDR), Dr Wim mentioned that Senegal is a clear case of hidden hunger, Urban diet is bigger in size and more diversified than rural diet, which remains largely dominated by cereals and nutrient adequacies are higher in areas known for production of corresponding crops especially for iron and millet, except for vitamin B12 and vitamin A
Alternative proteins could substitute traditional proteins, if production cost can be substantially reduced. Cell-based protein production replicates the processes that occur inside a living animal to produce meat. In precision fermentation, gene-edited microbes can make a wide range of organic molecules, such as protein. Swine and ruminants are more susceptible to disruption than poultry, as their easy-to-substitute mince products make up a higher share of value, while substitution of animal-based proteins also opens up new growth platforms, as growing world population still need proteins, albeit from different sources
Presentation for the International Grains Forum (www.igc.int/en/about/aboutus-pressrelease.aspx, www.igcargentina.com/eng/index.html)
https://globalfutures.cgiar.org/2015/12/20/to-latin-america-for-global-connections
Global Futures & Strategic Foresight (GFSF) program enhances and uses a coordinated suite of biophysical and socioeconomic models to assess potential returns to investments in new agricultural technologies and policies. These models include IFPRI’s International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT), hydrology and water supply-demand models, and the DSSAT suite of process-based crop models.
The program also provides tools and trainings to scientists and policy makers to undertake similar assessments.
GFSF program is a Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) program led by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Breeding Black, White, and Black & White Chickens - Laws Governing the Breedi...PolarisStarFarm
Excerpt on breeding chickens that have black, white, or black & white feathers, from The Laws Governing the Breeding of Standard Fowl by W. H. Card published in 1912.
Strategia Integrata de Dezvoltare Urbana Iasi 2016 v1CIVICA
Strategia Integrata de Dezvoltare Urbana Iasi 2016 v1 - draftul publicat de Primaria Municipiului Iasi pe 31 august 2016. Documentul se afla in consultare publica pana la finalul lunii septembrie 2016.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
Presentation for the second annual International Conference on Agro-Industrial Projections hosted by INAI (www.inai.org.ar, www.inai.org.ar/notas.asp?id=193) in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
https://globalfutures.cgiar.org/2015/12/20/to-latin-america-for-global-connections
The triennial conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) provides a platform for the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) teams of the CGIAR centers to showcase their work. The first symposium organized by these teams was on ‘Bio-economic modeling to assess options for enhancing food security under climate change in the developing world’ and it took place during the 29th IAAE conference in Brazil in 2012. The teams came again together in 2015 to organize a second symposium on ‘Interpreting results from using bio-economic modeling for global and regional ex ante impact assessment’ at the 30th IAAE conference which took place in Milan on August 8-14, 2015.
The triennial conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) provides a platform for the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) teams of the CGIAR centers to showcase their work. The first symposium organized by these teams was on ‘Bio-economic modeling to assess options for enhancing food security under climate change in the developing world’ and it took place during the 29th IAAE conference in Brazil in 2012. The teams came again together in 2015 to organize a second symposium on ‘Interpreting results from using bio-economic modeling for global and regional ex ante impact assessment’ at the 30th IAAE conference which took place in Milan on August 8-14, 2015.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
4. Shared Socioeconomic Pathways
Population, GDP and agricultural productivity assumptions by SSP (annual
percentage change, 2010 – 2050)
Source: IIASA, OECD, work in progress by IFPRI, PIK, USDA-ERS, LEI-WUR, GTAP/Purdue, FAO, IDS
5. Source: IPCC AR5 WG2 SPM, Figure 4(B), 31Mar2014
Global annual average surface temperature
Representative Concentration
Pathways
6. Baseline results for SSP1, 2 and 3
Baseline increases in global yields, area, production, consumption, exports, imports and prices
of coarse grains, rice, wheat, oilseeds and sugar in 2050 (% change relative to 2005 values)
Source: Work in progress by IFPRI, PIK, USDA-ERS, LEI-WUR, GTAP/Purdue, FAO, IDS
7. Climate change impacts in 2050
Climate change impacts on global yields, area, production, consumption, exports, imports and prices
of coarse grains, rice, wheat, oilseeds and sugar in 2050 (% change relative to 2050 baseline values)
Source: Work in progress by IFPRI, PIK, USDA-ERS, LEI-WUR, GTAP/Purdue, FAO, IDS
8. Climate change impacts and trade
Source: Work in progress by IFPRI, PIK, USDA-ERS, LEI-WUR, GTAP/Purdue, FAO, IDS
Impacts of climate change and trade policy on yields, area, production, exports and prices of five commodities, (%
deviation from baseline values in 2050 without climate change)
SSP1, RCP4.5 SSP3, RCP8.5
9. Scenarios
• Baseline
• Changes in population, income, policy
• Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs)
• Changes in climate
• Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs)
• Draw on work with AgMIP
• Alternative
• Broadly reflective of alternative CRP portfolios
• Different geographic emphases?
• Different commodity group emphases?
• Other criteria?
• How many?