Curry and construction
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•275 views
The document discusses competition law as it relates to construction companies in the UK. It provides an overview of prohibited anti-competitive agreements, penalties for violations including large fines, and leniency programs. It also summarizes a major case where 103 construction companies were fined a total of £129 million for collusive tendering practices like cover pricing. Compliance training and policies are recommended to reduce risks of infringement.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![COMPETITION LAW AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES JONATHAN MOAKES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, COMMERCE & TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT TEL 0161 618 4594, 07802 672329 [email_address] 25 May 2010](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/curryandconstruction-100526144402-phpapp02/85/Curry-and-construction-1-320.jpg)
![What is it about construction companies? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Compt. act
The document provides an overview of the MRTP Act of 1969 and the current competition law scenario in India. Some key points:
- The MRTP Act of 1969 aimed to prevent concentration of economic power and restrict unfair trade practices. It established the MRTP Commission to investigate monopolistic and restrictive trade practices.
- The Act was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India. The new law expanded the scope to also cover abuse of dominance and combinations/mergers.
- Unfair trade practices under MRTP Act included misleading ads, false representations, unsafe goods. The Commission could direct discontinuation or void related agreements.
- Competition policy aims to ensure fair competition through removal
competition act, 2002
The document provides an overview and comparison of the MRTP Act of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. Some key points:
- The MRTP Act aimed to prevent concentration of economic power and protect consumers, while the Competition Act of 2002 focuses more on increasing competition.
- The Competition Commission of India replaced the MRTP Act and was established to be the advocacy body for the new Competition Act.
- Some differences between the two acts include: the MRTP Act did not have judicial powers or penalties for offenses, while the Competition Act does; and registration of agreements was compulsory under the MRTP Act but not under the new Competition Act.
- The duties and powers of the Competition Commission
Outside cp knowledge presentation competition act _2002
The Competition Act of 2002 established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices and promote competition. The CCI is tasked with investigating anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant market positions, and mergers and acquisitions. Parties to a combination are not required to notify the CCI, but the CCI can investigate combinations on its own. The CCI faces challenges due to overlapping jurisdictions, unrealistic timelines, lack of cooperation from foreign counterparts, and limited resources and infrastructure.
Competition law & policy
Competition law and policy aims to promote fair competition in markets. The Competition Act of 2002 established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices. The CCI prohibits anti-competitive agreements between companies, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulates mergers and acquisitions. It investigates complaints and makes orders to protect competition and consumers. The objectives of the Act are to prevent anti-competitive behavior and practices, promote fair competition, protect consumer interests and ensure freedom of trade in India.
Competition law
The document discusses competition law in India. It provides an overview of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 and explains some of its key provisions. It then summarizes the Competition Act of 2002 which replaced the MRTP Act, outlining its three main elements of prohibiting anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and regulating combinations.
Competition law
Competition Law awareness and enforcement are increasing day by day. Long-term, sustainable growth of big organization, corporation and companies warrants attention to competition law while strategising their growth.
Competition act,2002
This document summarizes the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The key points are:
1. The Competition Act of 2002 replaced the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969.
2. The objectives of the new Act are to prohibit anti-competitive agreements like cartels, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulate combinations that could reduce competition.
3. The Act covers both horizontal restraints like price fixing and output restrictions, as well as vertical restraints like exclusive dealing and price discrimination.
Competition.introduction(part2)
This document provides statistics on the ten highest cartel fines imposed by the European Commission since 1969. It lists the largest fines per case and per company. The document then provides an overview of Article 101 of the TFEU, which prohibits anticompetitive agreements between undertakings. It discusses what constitutes an agreement under EU competition law and outlines the key elements analyzed in assessing potential violations of Article 101, including the concepts of object and effect. The document also touches on how economic principles like the prisoner's dilemma can help assess whether collusion between competitors is likely.
Recommended
Compt. act
The document provides an overview of the MRTP Act of 1969 and the current competition law scenario in India. Some key points:
- The MRTP Act of 1969 aimed to prevent concentration of economic power and restrict unfair trade practices. It established the MRTP Commission to investigate monopolistic and restrictive trade practices.
- The Act was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India. The new law expanded the scope to also cover abuse of dominance and combinations/mergers.
- Unfair trade practices under MRTP Act included misleading ads, false representations, unsafe goods. The Commission could direct discontinuation or void related agreements.
- Competition policy aims to ensure fair competition through removal
competition act, 2002
The document provides an overview and comparison of the MRTP Act of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. Some key points:
- The MRTP Act aimed to prevent concentration of economic power and protect consumers, while the Competition Act of 2002 focuses more on increasing competition.
- The Competition Commission of India replaced the MRTP Act and was established to be the advocacy body for the new Competition Act.
- Some differences between the two acts include: the MRTP Act did not have judicial powers or penalties for offenses, while the Competition Act does; and registration of agreements was compulsory under the MRTP Act but not under the new Competition Act.
- The duties and powers of the Competition Commission
Outside cp knowledge presentation competition act _2002
The Competition Act of 2002 established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices and promote competition. The CCI is tasked with investigating anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant market positions, and mergers and acquisitions. Parties to a combination are not required to notify the CCI, but the CCI can investigate combinations on its own. The CCI faces challenges due to overlapping jurisdictions, unrealistic timelines, lack of cooperation from foreign counterparts, and limited resources and infrastructure.
Competition law & policy
Competition law and policy aims to promote fair competition in markets. The Competition Act of 2002 established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices. The CCI prohibits anti-competitive agreements between companies, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulates mergers and acquisitions. It investigates complaints and makes orders to protect competition and consumers. The objectives of the Act are to prevent anti-competitive behavior and practices, promote fair competition, protect consumer interests and ensure freedom of trade in India.
Competition law
The document discusses competition law in India. It provides an overview of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 and explains some of its key provisions. It then summarizes the Competition Act of 2002 which replaced the MRTP Act, outlining its three main elements of prohibiting anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and regulating combinations.
Competition law
Competition Law awareness and enforcement are increasing day by day. Long-term, sustainable growth of big organization, corporation and companies warrants attention to competition law while strategising their growth.
Competition act,2002
This document summarizes the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The key points are:
1. The Competition Act of 2002 replaced the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969.
2. The objectives of the new Act are to prohibit anti-competitive agreements like cartels, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulate combinations that could reduce competition.
3. The Act covers both horizontal restraints like price fixing and output restrictions, as well as vertical restraints like exclusive dealing and price discrimination.
Competition.introduction(part2)
This document provides statistics on the ten highest cartel fines imposed by the European Commission since 1969. It lists the largest fines per case and per company. The document then provides an overview of Article 101 of the TFEU, which prohibits anticompetitive agreements between undertakings. It discusses what constitutes an agreement under EU competition law and outlines the key elements analyzed in assessing potential violations of Article 101, including the concepts of object and effect. The document also touches on how economic principles like the prisoner's dilemma can help assess whether collusion between competitors is likely.
Presentation on The competition act(2002)
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It discusses the objectives of eliminating anti-competitive practices and promoting fair competition. The main features covered are the prohibition of anti-competitive agreements such as cartels, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulations governing mergers and acquisitions. Enforcement is carried out by the Competition Commission of India through investigations and imposition of penalties. The act aims to protect consumer welfare and ensure fair competition in the market.
Competition policy
The Competition Act of 2002 aims to ensure fair competition in markets and protect consumer interests over firm size. It established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to eliminate anti-competitive practices, promote competition, and regulate combinations (mergers and acquisitions). The CCI, headed by a High Court judge, may pass orders directing firms to discontinue anti-competitive agreements or practices, impose penalties up to 10% of turnover, and approve or reject combinations. Its orders are enforceable like High Court orders, and appeals go to the Supreme Court. The Competition Amendment Bill of 2007 set up the Competition Appellate Tribunal as a quasi-judicial body to hear CCI appeals.
50037397 competition-act-ppt final
The document discusses competition and competition policy in India. It defines competition as situations in markets where sellers strive for buyers to achieve business goals. Competition policy aims to promote efficiency and maximize welfare. The Competition Act of 2002 established a commission to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumers, and ensure freedom of trade. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant positions. It regulates combinations and promotes competition advocacy. The Commission has powers like issuing cease/desist orders and imposing penalties.
Competitionact2002 090902133438-phpapp01
The document summarizes India's Competition Act of 2002 and outlines its objectives to promote fair competition in the market. It discusses different anti-competitive practices like cartels and abuse of dominance that the Act prohibits. It also describes the roles and powers of the Competition Commission of India in regulating combinations, enforcing the Act through penalties, and advocating for competitive markets through non-enforcement measures.
Competitionact2002 090902133438-phpapp01
The document discusses competition law and policy in India, noting that competition law aims to promote economic efficiency and consumer welfare by preventing anti-competitive practices like cartels and abuse of dominance, and regulating mergers and acquisitions. It also explains how various government policies around sectors like trade, industry and economic regulation should be reformed to promote more competition. The Competition Commission of India is established as the primary regulator to enforce competition law and investigate anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, and mergers and acquisitions.
Competition Law in China
The document summarizes China's new Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) which aims to prevent the abuse of dominant market positions, prohibit monopoly agreements, and regulate mergers and acquisitions. It notes that while the AML is still being implemented one year after taking effect, several Chinese authorities like MOFCOM, NDRC, and SAIC are responsible for its enforcement in areas like merger control, pricing issues, and agreements restricting competition. Companies doing business in China need to ensure they cooperate with investigations and comply with the AML to avoid fines or unwinding of deals, while some shortcomings of the new regime include uncertainty and possible discrimination against foreign firms.
Competition act 2002
The Competition Act 2002 establishes the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive practices. The Act aims to promote fair competition in markets while also protecting consumer interests. It prohibits anti-competitive agreements between entities, abuse of dominant market positions, and combinations that could significantly reduce competition. The Commission regulates mergers, acquisitions, and other transactions to ensure they do not harm competition in relevant markets.
Competition act
This document discusses competition law in India. It provides an overview of the benefits of competition as well as the evolution of competition law in India from the MRTP Act of 1970 to the current Competition Act of 2002. The Competition Act aims to promote fair competition and prevent anti-competitive practices. It covers anti-competitive agreements between firms, abuse of dominant position, and mergers and acquisitions. The Competition Commission of India regulates combinations and enforces penalties for violations of the Competition Act.
Competition Policy
The UK has four main bodies that govern competition:
1. The government ensures competition in the public interest and intervenes when necessary in privatized industries.
2. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) ensures businesses comply with competition law.
3. The Competition Commission reviews mergers, monopolies and regulatory inquiries, and hears appeals of OFT decisions.
4. Regulators like OFCOM and OFWAT have investigative and enforcement powers like the OFT over privatized industries.
Eco pres
The document summarizes competition laws in India, including the MRTP Act and the Competition Act of 2002. It provides details on anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, regulation of combinations, and the role of the Competition Commission of India. It also briefly discusses cases involving the cement industry, airlines industry, and automobile industry. Competition laws in the US and UK are also summarized at a high level.
Competition act 2002
The document discusses the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The MRTP Act aimed to prevent concentration of economic power and prohibit anti-competitive practices. It was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive activities and promote fair competition for consumers and businesses. The key objectives of both acts were to ensure competition in the market and protect consumer interests.
Competition Act,2002
The document provides an overview of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. Some key points:
- The Competition Act aims to prevent anti-competitive practices and promote competition. It established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to implement the law.
- The Act repealed the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969, which took a narrow view of competition. The new law focuses on "appreciable adverse effects on competition."
- CCI's roles include investigating anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance, regulating mergers and acquisitions, conducting advocacy work, and imposing penalties on violators.
MRTP Act 1969 and Competition Act 2002
The document compares the MRTP Act of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The MRTP Act aimed to control monopolies and restrictive trade practices, while the Competition Act aims to promote competition and protect consumer interests. It established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive conduct and regulate combinations. Some key differences are that the Competition Act explicitly defines anti-competitive offenses and regulates combinations, while the MRTP Act was more complex and reactive.
Bid Rigging
This document provides an overview of bid rigging and competition law in India. It defines bid rigging as competitors coordinating their bids to ensure either a higher price or lower quality wins the contract. It outlines different types of anticompetitive agreements prohibited under the Competition Act 2002 such as tie-in, exclusive distribution, and exclusive supply agreements. It also discusses the powers and duties of the Competition Commission of India in regulating combinations, inquiring into anticompetitive practices, and advocating for competition.
A comparative study of the provisions of the Indian Competition Act, US Anti ...
This document provides an overview of competition law in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. It discusses key provisions and comparisons. The main points are:
1) Competition law deals with restrictive business practices and market failures. The US Sherman Act of 1890 was one of the earliest such laws. India, UK, and over 100 other countries now have competition laws.
2) The Indian Competition Act covers anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and combinations. It established the Competition Commission of India to enforce the act.
3) US and UK competition laws are more rigorously applied and enforced through criminal sanctions. Violations in India are larger in number but attract less regulatory attention.
Dominant position
This document provides an overview of dominant position and abuse of dominance under EU competition law. It defines dominance as substantial market power over a period of time. Market shares above 30-50% are generally considered dominant but entry conditions also factor in. Abuses can be exclusionary, aimed at foreclosing rivals, or exploitative of customers. Specific abuses discussed include excessive pricing, loyalty rebates, tying and bundling, margin squeezes, and predatory pricing. The legal tests for these abuses generally examine whether conduct would exclude an equally efficient competitor or harm competition.
Competitionact2002ppt 130210021937-phpapp02 (1)
The document provides background information on competition law in India. It discusses how the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002 to promote competition after economic reforms in 1991. The Competition Act established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices. The CCI can investigate abuse of dominant position, mergers and anticompetitive agreements. It has powers to impose penalties and recommend structural changes to enterprises.
Law monopolies and restrictive trade practices act (mrtp
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) 1969 aims to control monopolies, prevent concentration of economic power, and regulate trade practices in India. It established the MRTP Commission to investigate complaints around restrictive, monopolistic, and unfair trade practices. Key provisions include requiring government approval for large mergers/acquisitions and new businesses, prohibiting restrictive agreements between companies, and empowering the Commission to issue orders to stop unfair practices and provide relief such as injunctions or compensation.
Grp 4 competition act, 2002.ppt (2)
Ppt on Competition Act, 2002 presented on 17th May 2015 at Chinmay Tutorials by CS Professional Students Abhishek Agarwal, Aditya Rana, Sakshi Gupta, Shreya Chaturvedi, Shipra Pareek
Competition act Aditi Chikurdekar
The document discusses the importance of competition and the need for competition laws when global trade is taking place on a single platform. It notes that India enacted the Competition Act 2002 to establish a new competition regime and foster competition in markets after economic reforms in 1991 made the previous MRTP Act inadequate. The Act aims to eliminate anti-competitive practices and promote competition for the benefit of consumers.
A quick guide to competition and consumer protection laws that affect your ...
The document provides a quick guide to competition and consumer protection laws that affect businesses in the UK. It summarizes that the Competition Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between businesses and abuse of a dominant market position. It also discusses rules around mergers, cartels, advertising credit, unfair commercial practices, and issuing contracts. The guide aims to help businesses understand and comply with relevant laws to avoid penalties and protect consumers.
More Related Content
What's hot
Presentation on The competition act(2002)
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It discusses the objectives of eliminating anti-competitive practices and promoting fair competition. The main features covered are the prohibition of anti-competitive agreements such as cartels, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulations governing mergers and acquisitions. Enforcement is carried out by the Competition Commission of India through investigations and imposition of penalties. The act aims to protect consumer welfare and ensure fair competition in the market.
Competition policy
The Competition Act of 2002 aims to ensure fair competition in markets and protect consumer interests over firm size. It established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to eliminate anti-competitive practices, promote competition, and regulate combinations (mergers and acquisitions). The CCI, headed by a High Court judge, may pass orders directing firms to discontinue anti-competitive agreements or practices, impose penalties up to 10% of turnover, and approve or reject combinations. Its orders are enforceable like High Court orders, and appeals go to the Supreme Court. The Competition Amendment Bill of 2007 set up the Competition Appellate Tribunal as a quasi-judicial body to hear CCI appeals.
50037397 competition-act-ppt final
The document discusses competition and competition policy in India. It defines competition as situations in markets where sellers strive for buyers to achieve business goals. Competition policy aims to promote efficiency and maximize welfare. The Competition Act of 2002 established a commission to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumers, and ensure freedom of trade. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant positions. It regulates combinations and promotes competition advocacy. The Commission has powers like issuing cease/desist orders and imposing penalties.
Competitionact2002 090902133438-phpapp01
The document summarizes India's Competition Act of 2002 and outlines its objectives to promote fair competition in the market. It discusses different anti-competitive practices like cartels and abuse of dominance that the Act prohibits. It also describes the roles and powers of the Competition Commission of India in regulating combinations, enforcing the Act through penalties, and advocating for competitive markets through non-enforcement measures.
Competitionact2002 090902133438-phpapp01
The document discusses competition law and policy in India, noting that competition law aims to promote economic efficiency and consumer welfare by preventing anti-competitive practices like cartels and abuse of dominance, and regulating mergers and acquisitions. It also explains how various government policies around sectors like trade, industry and economic regulation should be reformed to promote more competition. The Competition Commission of India is established as the primary regulator to enforce competition law and investigate anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, and mergers and acquisitions.
Competition Law in China
The document summarizes China's new Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) which aims to prevent the abuse of dominant market positions, prohibit monopoly agreements, and regulate mergers and acquisitions. It notes that while the AML is still being implemented one year after taking effect, several Chinese authorities like MOFCOM, NDRC, and SAIC are responsible for its enforcement in areas like merger control, pricing issues, and agreements restricting competition. Companies doing business in China need to ensure they cooperate with investigations and comply with the AML to avoid fines or unwinding of deals, while some shortcomings of the new regime include uncertainty and possible discrimination against foreign firms.
Competition act 2002
The Competition Act 2002 establishes the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive practices. The Act aims to promote fair competition in markets while also protecting consumer interests. It prohibits anti-competitive agreements between entities, abuse of dominant market positions, and combinations that could significantly reduce competition. The Commission regulates mergers, acquisitions, and other transactions to ensure they do not harm competition in relevant markets.
Competition act
This document discusses competition law in India. It provides an overview of the benefits of competition as well as the evolution of competition law in India from the MRTP Act of 1970 to the current Competition Act of 2002. The Competition Act aims to promote fair competition and prevent anti-competitive practices. It covers anti-competitive agreements between firms, abuse of dominant position, and mergers and acquisitions. The Competition Commission of India regulates combinations and enforces penalties for violations of the Competition Act.
Competition Policy
The UK has four main bodies that govern competition:
1. The government ensures competition in the public interest and intervenes when necessary in privatized industries.
2. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) ensures businesses comply with competition law.
3. The Competition Commission reviews mergers, monopolies and regulatory inquiries, and hears appeals of OFT decisions.
4. Regulators like OFCOM and OFWAT have investigative and enforcement powers like the OFT over privatized industries.
Eco pres
The document summarizes competition laws in India, including the MRTP Act and the Competition Act of 2002. It provides details on anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, regulation of combinations, and the role of the Competition Commission of India. It also briefly discusses cases involving the cement industry, airlines industry, and automobile industry. Competition laws in the US and UK are also summarized at a high level.
Competition act 2002
The document discusses the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The MRTP Act aimed to prevent concentration of economic power and prohibit anti-competitive practices. It was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive activities and promote fair competition for consumers and businesses. The key objectives of both acts were to ensure competition in the market and protect consumer interests.
Competition Act,2002
The document provides an overview of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. Some key points:
- The Competition Act aims to prevent anti-competitive practices and promote competition. It established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to implement the law.
- The Act repealed the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969, which took a narrow view of competition. The new law focuses on "appreciable adverse effects on competition."
- CCI's roles include investigating anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance, regulating mergers and acquisitions, conducting advocacy work, and imposing penalties on violators.
MRTP Act 1969 and Competition Act 2002
The document compares the MRTP Act of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The MRTP Act aimed to control monopolies and restrictive trade practices, while the Competition Act aims to promote competition and protect consumer interests. It established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive conduct and regulate combinations. Some key differences are that the Competition Act explicitly defines anti-competitive offenses and regulates combinations, while the MRTP Act was more complex and reactive.
Bid Rigging
This document provides an overview of bid rigging and competition law in India. It defines bid rigging as competitors coordinating their bids to ensure either a higher price or lower quality wins the contract. It outlines different types of anticompetitive agreements prohibited under the Competition Act 2002 such as tie-in, exclusive distribution, and exclusive supply agreements. It also discusses the powers and duties of the Competition Commission of India in regulating combinations, inquiring into anticompetitive practices, and advocating for competition.
A comparative study of the provisions of the Indian Competition Act, US Anti ...
This document provides an overview of competition law in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. It discusses key provisions and comparisons. The main points are:
1) Competition law deals with restrictive business practices and market failures. The US Sherman Act of 1890 was one of the earliest such laws. India, UK, and over 100 other countries now have competition laws.
2) The Indian Competition Act covers anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and combinations. It established the Competition Commission of India to enforce the act.
3) US and UK competition laws are more rigorously applied and enforced through criminal sanctions. Violations in India are larger in number but attract less regulatory attention.
Dominant position
This document provides an overview of dominant position and abuse of dominance under EU competition law. It defines dominance as substantial market power over a period of time. Market shares above 30-50% are generally considered dominant but entry conditions also factor in. Abuses can be exclusionary, aimed at foreclosing rivals, or exploitative of customers. Specific abuses discussed include excessive pricing, loyalty rebates, tying and bundling, margin squeezes, and predatory pricing. The legal tests for these abuses generally examine whether conduct would exclude an equally efficient competitor or harm competition.
Competitionact2002ppt 130210021937-phpapp02 (1)
The document provides background information on competition law in India. It discusses how the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002 to promote competition after economic reforms in 1991. The Competition Act established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices. The CCI can investigate abuse of dominant position, mergers and anticompetitive agreements. It has powers to impose penalties and recommend structural changes to enterprises.
Law monopolies and restrictive trade practices act (mrtp
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) 1969 aims to control monopolies, prevent concentration of economic power, and regulate trade practices in India. It established the MRTP Commission to investigate complaints around restrictive, monopolistic, and unfair trade practices. Key provisions include requiring government approval for large mergers/acquisitions and new businesses, prohibiting restrictive agreements between companies, and empowering the Commission to issue orders to stop unfair practices and provide relief such as injunctions or compensation.
Grp 4 competition act, 2002.ppt (2)
Ppt on Competition Act, 2002 presented on 17th May 2015 at Chinmay Tutorials by CS Professional Students Abhishek Agarwal, Aditya Rana, Sakshi Gupta, Shreya Chaturvedi, Shipra Pareek
Competition act Aditi Chikurdekar
The document discusses the importance of competition and the need for competition laws when global trade is taking place on a single platform. It notes that India enacted the Competition Act 2002 to establish a new competition regime and foster competition in markets after economic reforms in 1991 made the previous MRTP Act inadequate. The Act aims to eliminate anti-competitive practices and promote competition for the benefit of consumers.
What's hot (20)
A comparative study of the provisions of the Indian Competition Act, US Anti ...
A comparative study of the provisions of the Indian Competition Act, US Anti ...
Law monopolies and restrictive trade practices act (mrtp
Law monopolies and restrictive trade practices act (mrtp
Similar to Curry and construction
A quick guide to competition and consumer protection laws that affect your ...
The document provides a quick guide to competition and consumer protection laws that affect businesses in the UK. It summarizes that the Competition Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between businesses and abuse of a dominant market position. It also discusses rules around mergers, cartels, advertising credit, unfair commercial practices, and issuing contracts. The guide aims to help businesses understand and comply with relevant laws to avoid penalties and protect consumers.
Competition act 2002
The document discusses competition law and policy in India. It defines competition and outlines the benefits of competition for companies, consumers, and the government. However, it notes that these benefits are lost without fair competition or if a monopoly exists. It then discusses key aspects of competition law and policy in India such as the objectives to promote economic efficiency and protect consumers, types of anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance, the role and powers of the Competition Commission of India, and penalties for anti-competitive behavior.
Edxcel Unit 1 Government Regulation
More revision resources on the EdExcel Economics syllabus are available from the Tutor2u store - click here http://www.tutor2u.net/acatalog/Edexcel-Economics.html
Article 102 TFEU
This document summarizes Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which prohibits the abuse of a dominant market position. It defines key terms like "undertakings", "dominant position", and "substantial part of the internal market". It discusses types of competitors including actual competitors based on market share, and potential competitors. It also outlines factors that can influence competition such as barriers to entry, countervailing buyer power, and the degree of market power held by a dominant undertaking.
An overview of competition law in Malaysia
Competition Law seeks to protect the process of competition for the ultimate benefit of the citizens, allowing for lower prices, better products and choices for consumers.
6XZ1799
This document discusses important trends in antitrust compliance, enforcement, and litigation for manufacturers. It notes that criminal antitrust enforcement is actively pursued by government agencies and that penalties for violations are severe. Manufacturers should be aware of prohibited conduct such as agreements among competitors to fix prices, allocate customers or markets, or rig bids. Trade associations also require caution, as discussions among competitors could evidence anticompetitive agreements. Mergers and acquisitions are an area of increasing agency focus. An effective compliance policy can help guide a company's conduct and mitigate risks.
Baker & McKenzie's Doing Business in Poland - Chapter 6 (Competition Law)
This document summarizes Poland's competition law as outlined in the Competition and Consumers Protection Act. It discusses prohibited agreements and practices such as price fixing, market allocation, and abuse of a dominant position. The President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection enforces competition law and can impose fines of up to 10% of annual turnover. Companies can benefit from leniency by cooperating with investigations. Mergers above certain turnover thresholds require notification to and clearance from the competition authority.
Competition Act, 2002
The document discusses competition law and policy in India. It provides definitions of key concepts like competition and dominant position. It describes the objectives of competition law as promoting economic efficiency and consumer welfare. The Competition Act 2002 aims to prevent anti-competitive practices by firms like cartels, abuse of dominance, and regulate mergers and acquisitions. It established the Competition Commission of India as a regulatory body with quasi-judicial powers.
Remedies and commitments in abuse cases – OJEDA CARDENAS – December 2022 OECD...
Remedies and commitments in abuse cases – OJEDA CARDENAS – December 2022 OECD...OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs
This presentation by Lucía Ojeda Cardenás (Partner, SAI Derecho & Economía) was made during a discussion on Remedies and commitments in abuse cases at the 21st meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 2 December 2022. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at https://oe.cd/rcac.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent. Icab lectures chapter last
Regulation of businesses is necessary to address market failures and protect public interest. Some key reasons for regulation include addressing issues like market imperfections, externalities, and information asymmetries. Regulations are imposed by government bodies and can take various forms including price controls, taxes, subsidies, and rules on competition and corporate governance. Businesses respond to regulations in different ways, from mere compliance to full compliance and innovation. International regulations also influence businesses globally, with countries like the US and EU having significant impact. Acts like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the US regulate financial reporting, auditing, and whistleblowing for listed companies.
Best practices on PPPs contracts
This document outlines best practices for structuring public-private partnership (PPP) and concession contracts. Key points include:
1. Using output-based contracts focused on performance rather than investment obligations to incentivize efficiency.
2. Requiring adequate insurance, performance bonds, and credit ratings to ensure compliance.
3. Protecting financiers and monitoring concessionaire finances through revenue assignment, financial disclosure, and notification of non-compliance.
4. Establishing clear risk matrices and sharing arrangements based on ability to control risks and potential for externalization.
5. Including provisions for default management, mediation, termination, and credit enhancement of government payments.
Legal environment i
The document discusses the legal environment of business in India, specifically covering the MRTP Act and Consumer Protection Act. It aims to control concentration of economic power and monopolies through the MRTP Act and protect consumer rights such as safety, redress, and fair trade through the Consumer Protection Act. Major topics covered include deemed restrictive trade practices, unfair trade practices, consumer rights and grounds for filing complaints to consumer redressal forums.
Chapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in Colombia
The document summarizes Colombia's competition law and regulations. It discusses the authorities that oversee competition, prohibited restrictive practices, corporate integration processes, and unfair competition. The Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) is identified as the highest authority that oversees competition and can impose fines on companies for anti-competitive behavior or for integrating without approval. Restrictive practices include price fixing agreements between competitors as well as abuses of dominant market position. Corporate integrations require SIC notification or approval depending on the size of the companies and markets involved.
Andrew Daly, Hempsons
Levelling the playing field: Does procurement law help or hinder? Presented at NCVO Sustainable Funding Conference 2011: Adapt, Gain, Grow.
Article 102 TFEU (2)
There are three main approaches to analyzing abuse of dominance under Article 102 - per se rule, effects analysis, and de minimis doctrine. The per se rule presumes conduct with anti-competitive object has an effect, while effects analysis assesses consumer impact. De minimis doctrine warns of matters too immaterial for court consideration. The document also outlines types of abuse like exploitative and exclusionary, and defenses like objective necessity and efficiencies. It provides an overview of different jurisprudence on analyzing abuse of dominance claims.
Competiton law
The document provides an overview of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It discusses key aspects of the Act including its objectives to prevent anti-competitive practices and abuse of dominance. It outlines the prohibitions on anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It also covers the regulation of combinations or mergers and acquisitions as well as the thresholds for notification. The document proposes some amendments to the Act including increasing pre-merger consultation and notification timelines.
Competition act
The document summarizes India's Competition Act of 2002. The Act aims to promote fair competition in the market and protect consumer interests. It prohibits anti-competitive agreements between businesses like price fixing. It also prevents abuse of dominant market positions. The Act regulates mergers and acquisitions that could reduce competition. Review of combinations is subject to thresholds based on company turnover to encourage business growth. The Competition Commission of India enforces the Act and ensures open competition.
Day 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in Pakistan
The document discusses the importance of competition in developing countries and the need for competition laws. It provides background on competition laws in Pakistan, from the original 1970 law to the current 2010 Competition Act. The current law established the Competition Commission of Pakistan and prohibits anti-competitive behaviors such as abuse of dominant market position, cartelization through prohibited agreements, deceptive marketing practices, and mergers or acquisitions that substantially lessen competition. It also stresses the importance of advocacy and increasing awareness of competition laws.
Pallavi shroff
The document provides information on how the Competition Act of 2002 impacts trade associations in India. It discusses how trade associations can violate the act through anticompetitive agreements or facilitating prohibited information exchanges between competitors. The Competition Commission of India has found some trade associations guilty of cartel-like behavior in the past, such as the film producers association engaging in boycotts and price fixing. Trade associations need to avoid facilitating discussions around prices, markets, bids, and exchanges of sensitive competitive information to stay compliant with the act.
Similar to Curry and construction (20)
A quick guide to competition and consumer protection laws that affect your ...
A quick guide to competition and consumer protection laws that affect your ...
Baker & McKenzie's Doing Business in Poland - Chapter 6 (Competition Law)
Baker & McKenzie's Doing Business in Poland - Chapter 6 (Competition Law)
Remedies and commitments in abuse cases – OJEDA CARDENAS – December 2022 OECD...
Remedies and commitments in abuse cases – OJEDA CARDENAS – December 2022 OECD...
Chapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in Colombia
Chapter 13: How free economic competition is protected in Colombia
Day 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in Pakistan
Day 1 Intro to CCP and Competition Law in Pakistan
Recently uploaded
Digital Transformation Frameworks: Driving Digital Excellence
[To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This presentation is a curated compilation of PowerPoint diagrams and templates designed to illustrate 20 different digital transformation frameworks and models. These frameworks are based on recent industry trends and best practices, ensuring that the content remains relevant and up-to-date.
Key highlights include Microsoft's Digital Transformation Framework, which focuses on driving innovation and efficiency, and McKinsey's Ten Guiding Principles, which provide strategic insights for successful digital transformation. Additionally, Forrester's framework emphasizes enhancing customer experiences and modernizing IT infrastructure, while IDC's MaturityScape helps assess and develop organizational digital maturity. MIT's framework explores cutting-edge strategies for achieving digital success.
These materials are perfect for enhancing your business or classroom presentations, offering visual aids to supplement your insights. Please note that while comprehensive, these slides are intended as supplementary resources and may not be complete for standalone instructional purposes.
Frameworks/Models included:
Microsoft’s Digital Transformation Framework
McKinsey’s Ten Guiding Principles of Digital Transformation
Forrester’s Digital Transformation Framework
IDC’s Digital Transformation MaturityScape
MIT’s Digital Transformation Framework
Gartner’s Digital Transformation Framework
Accenture’s Digital Strategy & Enterprise Frameworks
Deloitte’s Digital Industrial Transformation Framework
Capgemini’s Digital Transformation Framework
PwC’s Digital Transformation Framework
Cisco’s Digital Transformation Framework
Cognizant’s Digital Transformation Framework
DXC Technology’s Digital Transformation Framework
The BCG Strategy Palette
McKinsey’s Digital Transformation Framework
Digital Transformation Compass
Four Levels of Digital Maturity
Design Thinking Framework
Business Model Canvas
Customer Journey Map
Innovation Management Frameworks: Your Guide to Creativity & Innovation
Innovation Management Frameworks: Your Guide to Creativity & InnovationOperational Excellence Consulting
[To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This PowerPoint compilation offers a comprehensive overview of 20 leading innovation management frameworks and methodologies, selected for their broad applicability across various industries and organizational contexts. These frameworks are valuable resources for a wide range of users, including business professionals, educators, and consultants.
Each framework is presented with visually engaging diagrams and templates, ensuring the content is both informative and appealing. While this compilation is thorough, please note that the slides are intended as supplementary resources and may not be sufficient for standalone instructional purposes.
This compilation is ideal for anyone looking to enhance their understanding of innovation management and drive meaningful change within their organization. Whether you aim to improve product development processes, enhance customer experiences, or drive digital transformation, these frameworks offer valuable insights and tools to help you achieve your goals.
INCLUDED FRAMEWORKS/MODELS:
1. Stanford’s Design Thinking
2. IDEO’s Human-Centered Design
3. Strategyzer’s Business Model Innovation
4. Lean Startup Methodology
5. Agile Innovation Framework
6. Doblin’s Ten Types of Innovation
7. McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth
8. Customer Journey Map
9. Christensen’s Disruptive Innovation Theory
10. Blue Ocean Strategy
11. Strategyn’s Jobs-To-Be-Done (JTBD) Framework with Job Map
12. Design Sprint Framework
13. The Double Diamond
14. Lean Six Sigma DMAIC
15. TRIZ Problem-Solving Framework
16. Edward de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats
17. Stage-Gate Model
18. Toyota’s Six Steps of Kaizen
19. Microsoft’s Digital Transformation Framework
20. Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)
To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Fin...
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Fin...❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Final ank Satta Matka Dpbos Final ank Satta Matta Matka 143 Kalyan Matka Guessing Final Matka Final ank Today Matka 420 Satta Batta Satta 143 Kalyan Chart Main Bazar Chart vip Matka Guessing Dpboss 143 Guessing Kalyan night 一比一原版(QMUE毕业证书)英国爱丁堡玛格丽特女王大学毕业证文凭如何办理
永久可查学历认证【微信：A575476】【(QMUE毕业证书)英国爱丁堡玛格丽特女王大学毕业证成绩单Offer】【微信：A575476】（留信学历认证永久存档查询）采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信：A575476】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信：A575476】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
→ 【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：可来公司面谈，可签订合同，会陪同客户一起到教育部认证窗口递交认证材料，客户在教育部官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
欧洲杯赌球-欧洲杯赌球买球官方官网-欧洲杯赌球比赛投注官网|【网址🎉ac55.net🎉】
【网址🎉ac55.net🎉】欧洲杯赌球是世界上历史最悠久的博彩公司之一。其历史可以追溯到十九世纪末，确切时间是1886年。这家英国公司拥有超过15000名员工，是博彩行业规模最大的公司。欧洲杯赌球是英国最受欢迎的实体博彩公司之一，其排名仅次于欧洲杯赌球，旗下2800家投注站遍布全英国。
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
SATTA MATKA DPBOSS KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART KALYAN MATKA MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA TIPS SATTA MATKA MATKA COM MATKA PANA JODI TODAY BATTA SATKA MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER MATKA RESULTS MATKA CHART MATKA JODI SATTA COM INDIA SATTA MATKA MATKA TIPS MATKA WAPKA ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA RESULT DPBOSS MATKA 143 MAIN MATKA KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART
The Most Inspiring Entrepreneurs to Follow in 2024.pdf
In a world where the potential of youth innovation remains vastly untouched, there emerges a guiding light in the form of Norm Goldstein, the Founder and CEO of EduNetwork Partners. His dedication to this cause has earned him recognition as a Congressional Leadership Award recipient.
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on developments in AI, the venture capital investment landscape and Curiosity VC's approach to investing, at the alumni event of Amsterdam Business School (University of Amsterdam) on June 13, 2024 in Amsterdam.
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
Nathalie zal delen hoe DEI en ESG een fundamentele rol kunnen spelen in je merkstrategie en je de juiste aansluiting kan creëren met je doelgroep. Door middel van voorbeelden en simpele handvatten toont ze hoe dit in jouw organisatie toegepast kan worden.
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
SATTA MATKA DPBOSS KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART KALYAN MATKA MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA TIPS SATTA MATKA MATKA COM MATKA PANA JODI TODAY BATTA SATKA MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER MATKA RESULTS MATKA CHART MATKA JODI SATTA COM INDIA SATTA MATKA MATKA TIPS MATKA WAPKA ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA RESULT DPBOSS MATKA 143 MAIN MATKA KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
SATTA MATKA DPBOSS KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART KALYAN MATKA MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA TIPS SATTA MATKA MATKA COM MATKA PANA JODI TODAY BATTA SATKA MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER MATKA RESULTS MATKA CHART MATKA JODI SATTA COM INDIA SATTA MATKA MATKA TIPS MATKA WAPKA ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA RESULT DPBOSS MATKA 143 MAIN MATKA KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Prescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPT
Business analysis - Prescriptive analytics Introduction to Prescriptive analytics
Prescriptive Modeling
Non Linear Optimization
Demonstrating Business Performance Improvement
Best Competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai - ☎ 9928909666
Stone Art Hub offers the best competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai, ensuring affordability without compromising quality. With a wide range of exquisite marble options to choose from, you can enhance your spaces with elegance and sophistication. For inquiries or orders, contact us at ☎ 9928909666. Experience luxury at unbeatable prices.
Ellen Burstyn: From Detroit Dreamer to Hollywood Legend | CIO Women Magazine
In this article, we will dive into the extraordinary life of Ellen Burstyn, where the curtains rise on a story that's far more attractive than any script.
Profiles of Iconic Fashion Personalities.pdf
The fashion industry is dynamic and ever-changing, continuously sculpted by trailblazing visionaries who challenge norms and redefine beauty. This document delves into the profiles of some of the most iconic fashion personalities whose impact has left a lasting impression on the industry. From timeless designers to modern-day influencers, each individual has uniquely woven their thread into the rich fabric of fashion history, contributing to its ongoing evolution.
Recently uploaded (20)
Digital Transformation Frameworks: Driving Digital Excellence
Digital Transformation Frameworks: Driving Digital Excellence
Innovation Management Frameworks: Your Guide to Creativity & Innovation
Innovation Management Frameworks: Your Guide to Creativity & Innovation
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Fin...
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Fin...
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
The Most Inspiring Entrepreneurs to Follow in 2024.pdf
The Most Inspiring Entrepreneurs to Follow in 2024.pdf
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Best Competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai - ☎ 9928909666
Best Competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai - ☎ 9928909666
Ellen Burstyn: From Detroit Dreamer to Hollywood Legend | CIO Women Magazine
Ellen Burstyn: From Detroit Dreamer to Hollywood Legend | CIO Women Magazine
Curry and construction
- 1. COMPETITION LAW AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES JONATHAN MOAKES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, COMMERCE & TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT TEL 0161 618 4594, 07802 672329 [email_address] 25 May 2010
- 24. COMPETITION LAW AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES JONATHAN MOAKES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, COMMERCE & TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT TEL 0161 618 4594, 07802 672329 [email_address] 25 May 2010