Crocodile Gold is an Australian gold producer with assets located in the Northern Territory. The company's production is expanding throughout 2021 from open pit mines and the new Cosmo underground mine. Cosmo is expected to contribute 50% of ounces at full production and provide higher grade mill feed. Exploration is also focusing on targets near existing mills that have the potential for near term, low cost production such as at Union Reefs. Crocodile Gold's infrastructure and multiple deposits provide leverage to increasing production and decreasing costs over 2021.

1. An Evolving
Australian Gold
Producer
AUGUST 2011
TSX:CRK OTCQX:CROCF
FRANKFURT:XGC

2. Disclaimer
Forward Looking Statements TSX:CRK
This presentation contains forward-looking statements under Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements
with respect to the development potential and timetable of the projects; the Company‟s ability to raise additional funds as necessary; the future price of gold; the
estimation of mineral resources; conclusions of economic evaluation (including scoping studies); the realization of mineral resource estimates; the timing and amount
of estimated future production, development and exploration; costs of future activities; capital and operating expenditures; success of exploration activities; mining or
processing issues; currency exchange rates; government regulation of mining operations; and environmental risks. Generally, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”,
“intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”,
“could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the
date such statements are made. Estimates regarding the anticipated timing, amount and cost of mining at the projects are based on assumptions underlying mineral
resource estimates and the realization of such estimates; results of previous mining activities at the projects, and detailed research and analysis completed by
independent of the Company; research and estimates regarding the timing of delivery for long-lead items; knowledge regarding the factors consultants and
management involved in building a mine and other factors described in the technical reports and Annual Information Form filed under the profile of the Company on
SEDAR. Capital and operating cost estimates are based on results of previous mining activities, research of the Company and independent consultants, recent
estimates of construction and mining costs and other factors that are set out in the scoping study. Production estimates are based on mine plans and production
schedules, which have been developed by the Company‟s personnel and independent consultants. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from
those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to risks related to: timing and availability of external financing on acceptable
terms; unexpected events and delays during construction, expansion and start-up; variations in ore grade and recovery rates; receipt and revocation of government
approvals; actual results of exploration and mining activities; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of gold; failure of plant,
equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry. Although management of the Company has
attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other
factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results
and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Investors are advised that National Instrument NI 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators requires that each category of mineral reserves and mineral
resources be reported separately. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Due to the uncertainty of measured,
indicated or inferred mineral resources, these mineral resources may never be upgraded to proven and probable mineral reserves.
Non-GAAP Measures
Crocodile Gold believes that investors use certain indicators to assess gold mining companies. The indicators are intended to provide additional information and should
not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards.
“Cash Cost per Ounce” is a non-GAAP performance measure which could provide an indication of the mining and processing efficiency at the operations. It is
determined by dividing the operating expenses, excluding stock-based compensation allocated to the operating expense and next of silver revenue, by the number of
ounces of gold sold. There are variations in the method of computation of „cash cost per ounce” as determined by the Company compared with other mining
companies.
Qualified Person
David Keough, MAusIMM of Crocodile Gold Australia Operations is a “qualified person” as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and
confirmed the technical information and data included in this presentation.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated or Inferred Resources
The information presented uses the terms “measured”, “indicated” and “inferred” mineral resources. United States investors are advised that while such terms are
recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these terms. “Inferred mineral
resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an
inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of
feasibility or other economic studies. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be
converted into mineral reserves. United States investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is economically
or legally mineable.

3. First World Location &
Infrastructure TSX:CRK

4. Our Assets
TSX:CRK
Production Development Mills
Howley Trend Cosmo Union Reefs Mill
 open pit mine  underground mine  2.4 mtpy
 initial ore mined 3rd  in operation
North Point Qtr 2011
 open pit mine Tom’s Gully Mill
 oxide, low strip ratio Pine Creek-  240,000 tpy
 dry season operation International  Care and
(May – Nov)  open pit mine maintenance
 Production upon
Princess Louise receipt of permits
 open pit mine
 dry season operation
(May – Nov) Exploration Potential
>2,700 km2
4

5. Investment Advantage
TSX:CRK
 Expanding production profile, decreasing cash costs
 Outstanding potential to discover additional resources
 3.175 million ounces M&I and 2.14 million ounces Inf.
 Infrastructure replacement value = $200M (Adjacent to
major highway and utilities)
 2010 production of 82,000 ounces
 2011 production guidance: 77,500 – 82,500 ounces
5

6. 2011 – Growing Production
Throughout the Year TSX:CRK
2011 Key Catalysts
 Production from Cosmo
 Initial ore expected 3rd Qtr -2011
 Will contribute 50% of ounces at full production (800,000 t.p.a. ore).
 Production from Pine Creek- International, upon receipt of permits
 Aggressive exploration program (Brownfields and Greenfields)
 Increasing % of high grade mill feed throughout the year from Cosmo
2011 Guidance 2011 Production 2011 Major
77,500 -82,500 oz Sources Capital
Cash Cost Open Pits: Howley, Investments
US$1,150-$1,250/oz Princess Louise, Pine Cosmo underground
Creek/Union Reefs area
Exploration
Underground: Cosmo,
Brocks Creek
6

7. Cosmo/Howley Area
TSX:CRK

8. Howley Trend Open Pit Mining
May 2011 TSX:CRK
Mottrams Pit - Looking South Mottrams Pit – Looking West
8
Howley Pit and Ore ROM Pad Mottrams Pit – Looking South

9. Cosmo – East Lode
Expansion Potential TSX:CRK
9

10. Cosmo – West Lode
Expansion Potential TSX:CRK
10

11. Cosmo Development
July 2011 TSX:CRK
Eastern
Lodes
First Ore
As Constructed
Design
Western
Lodes
Potential extension
Of Western Lode
11

12. Cosmo – Dewatering
June 2011 TSX:CRK
Future Ventilation
Raise
12

13. Cosmo Underground Equipment
TSX:CRK
13

14. Mining Projects –
Cost Comparison TSX:CRK
 Cosmo development
provides leverage of Open Pit Open Pit Open Pit Open Pit Underground
additional high-grade ore Example Example Example Example
leading to significantly Burnside Burnside Burnside Pine Creek Cosmo
lower cash costs/oz.
 Cosmo mining costs are Mining Cost per Tonne $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $44.00
higher than open pits but Strip Ratio 3.0 3.0 6.5 2.5
the ounces per vertical Mining Cost per Tonne
meter assist in lower Milled $10.00 $10.00 $18.75 $8.75 $44.00
mining costs for Processing Cost $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00
Ore Haulage $8.25 $8.25 $8.25 $2.50 $8.50
underground.
Site General &
 Cosmo will eventually Administration $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50
make up 40% of mill feed
(50% of ounces) which will Total $/Tonne Milled $37.75 $37.75 $46.50 $30.75 $72.00
help lower overall costs Ore Grade 1.30 1.50 1.50 1.30 4.50
and improve overall Recovery 90.0% 90.0% 93.0% 80.0% 92.0%
production.
Cost per Ounce $1,003 $870 $1,037 $920 $541
 Open Pits provide good
margin (US$400) to
current gold price.
14

15. Outside Exploration - Cosmo
Conductive/Magnetic Targets Associated
With the Cosmo Trend TSX:CRK
AEM

16. Burnside: Howley Trend
25 Kilometres of Potential TSX:CRK
16

17. Union Reefs/Pine Creek Area
TSX:CRK
17

18. Union Reefs & Pine Creek
Near Term, Low Cost Production TSX:CRK
 New targets adjacent
to Union Reefs Mill
 Potential for near
term, low cost
production
 Currently prioritizing
targets
 Potential production
mid 2011
 Pine Creek Indicated
Resources increased
from 69,600 oz to
288,600 oz
18

19. Union Reefs
TSX:CRK
Historical Production/Intercepts:
Union Reefs = 800,000 oz Au
Pine Creek = 750,000 oz Au
Significant potential to increase existing resources
Union North: Lady Alice:
3m @ 24.56 g/t Au 5m @ 31.97 g/t Au
3m @ 45.10 g/t Au
Prospect Claim:
3m @ 37.50 g/t Au
Crosscourse – “Cosmo” scale target:
11m @ 6.60g/t Au 19m @ 10.62 g/t Au
36m @ 4.10 g/t Au 9m @ 24.40 g/t Au
16m @ 6.00 g/t Au 9m @ 4.00 g/t Au
19

20. Union Reef
Crosscourse Deposit TSX:CRK
1.5 g/t Au 4 g/t Au over 30 metres
Mineralized
Quartz Veins
Crosscourse Pit Mineralization (Photo taken in base of pit at Crosscourse in
2003 looking north. Mineralization is estimated to be around 30m wide at a grade
of 4g/t plunging to the north at around 60o. Red line is showing high grade zone
20
and orange line is lower grade margin (~1.5g/t).)

21. Union Reef Development
Conceptual Cost Profile TSX:CRK
 Using previous operating data, Conceptual Conceptual Conceptual
existing cost regime, and Underground Underground Underground Underground
projected grades, deposits show Cosmo Prospect Prospect Crosscourse
excellent potential to deliver low Union Reef Union Reef Union Reef
cost ounces to the production
profile.
Mining Cost per Tonne
 Number 1 Exploration priority
Milled $44.00 $80.00 $80.00 $44.00
 High-Grade vein targets
Processing Cost $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00
(Prospect & Lady Alice)
Ore Haulage $8.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
 Bulk-Ore targets
(Crosscourse- “Cosmo Site General &
Style”) Administration $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50
 Need to expand resources and
complete detailed mining Total $/Tonne Milled $72.00 $99.50 $99.50 $63.50
studies before deposits can be
included in any future Ore Grade 4.50 6.00 7.50 4.50
production forecasts. Recovery 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0%
 No guarantee that an economic
resource will be discovered to Cost per Ounce $541 $561 $448 $477
justify a production decision.
21

22. Exploration
TSX:CRK
22

23. Massive Sulfide Deposits
TSX:CRK
MOUNT BONNIE IRON BLOW
Historic Resource* Historic Production
 650,000t - 1.7g/t Au, 279g/t Ag = Au eq 9.3g/t or  10,000t oxide @ 9g/t Au and 250g/t Ag = Au eq
194,000oz 15.8g
 plus 9% Zn, 2% Pb, 0.5% Cu  25,000t sulphide (supergene) @ 7g/t Au and
360g/t Ag = Au eq 17g
Oxide Cap previously mined  Total production Au eq = 18,747oz
 110,000t @ 7g/t Au and 230g/t Ag
Current Inferred Resources
 Au eq = 13.3g/t Au or 47,000oz Au
 3,175,000t @ 2.1g/t Au, 101g/t Ag, 3.3% Zn,
0.76% Pb, 0.19% Cu
Aeromagnetics- tilt derivative
 Au eq = 4.85g or 495,000oz
(only Au and Ag considered)
* “Gold Deposits of the Northern Territory” by Ahmad, Wygralak and Ferenczi, 2009. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify this historical estimate
as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Crocodile Gold is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves and the historical
estimate should not be relied upon. Crocodile Gold believes with minimal confirmatory drilling this historic resource information could be included in the Mineral Resource
inventory.

24. Maud Creek Deposit
TSX:CRK
Resources*
Mined 173,600t @3.32g/t Au – 18,500oz
Indicated - 9,288,000t @3.1g/t Au for 935,000oz
Inferred - 1,072,000t @2.4g/t Au for 82,000oz using a
1.0g/t Au cut-off
 Indicated Resource -Greater than 4.5g/t Au – 3.1 Mt
@ 6.3 g/t for 628,000oz
 Partially refractory – metallurgical testing indicates
90-95% recovery by flotation with concentrates
grading 6 opt.
 Near the town of Katherine – 8km haul road to
paved highway
 Significant asset to Crocodile Gold
 North south trending, good widths, excellent
configuration for underground mining
*Mineral Reserves are included in Mineral Resources. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability. Depleted for mining as at December 31, 2010 and does not include any depletion for mining since such date.
The Mineral Reserve estimate was reviewed and optimized by Mark Edwards who is a “qualified person” as such term is defined in National
Instrument 43-101 and has supervised the preparation of the technical information in this presentation. The mineral resource estimate was Cross section
generated using the following parameters:
•Models used have been reviewed and optimized by Mark Edwards and Fleur Muller
•Model technique is Ordinary Kriging, Multiple Indicator Kriging or Inverse Distance (review NI43-101 for more details)
•Mineralization wireframes conducted on 0.4-2g/t material with a minimum width of 1-2m depending on deposit and mineralization styles
•High grade top cut used of 2-40g/t depending on statistical review of sample results
•1m metre samples with core half core or split RC samples used in models
•Samples were generally submitted to NAL and analyzed using 50g fire assay with AAS finish, some samples were submitted to umpire
laboratory for QAQC purposes

25. Regional Exploration Program
(Airborne Geophysics Survey Areas) TSX:CRK
Bons Rush
Mt. Ellison
Woolwonga
Brocks Creek
 3,700 line Km’s Scheduled
for Mid June
Cosmo Mine Mt. Bonnie
 Combined AEM and
magnetometer survey
 Geotech VTEM system- state
of the art
 Includes Moline and Maud
Creek tenements 25

26. Undervalued on Equivalent/oz Au
Comparison TSX:CRK
$400
MFL
EV/oz Au Producer Average
$350 = $US 145/oz
$300 KCN
Crocodile Gold
EV/oz Au (US$/oz)
GAM
$250
HRG = $US 45/oz
TGZ AGI
$200 SMF NGD
P
$150
Average
ORA
EDV
$100 AVMAUQ
JAG ARZ
OGCGSC RSG
CLF
$50 NGX
CRK
RML
$0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000
Source: NBF Total Resources (Koz Au)
Updated on June 15, 2011 26

27. Undervalued on Price to Net
Asset Value Comparison TSX:CRK
2
1.5
1
0.5x
0.5
0
ORA CRK AGI GSC LSG YRI ANO ELD AEM
Source: Raymond James Gold Producers 27
Updated as of June 14, 2011

28. Management & Board
TSX:CRK
Management Board of Directors
Chantal Lavoie, P.Eng. Stan Bharti, P.Eng.
President and Chief Executive Officer Chairman
Chantal Lavoie, P.Eng
David Keough
Chief Operating Officer George Faught, CA
Steve Woodhead Mike Hoffman, P.Eng.
Chief Financial Officer
Bruce Humphrey, P.Eng.
Bill Nielsen, P. Geo
Vice President Exploration
Peter Tagliamonte, P.Eng.
Colinda Parent
Vice President Business Development
Brianna Davies
Corporate Secretary
28

29. Capital Structure
TSX:CRK
Share Structure (at July 31, 2011)
Analyst Coverage
Cormark Securities
TSX:CRK
Fraser Mackenzie
Shares Issued & 309,851,311 Raymond James
Outstanding Union Securities
Warrants 69,499,116 CRK Share Price
Options 19,441,204 $1.80
$1.60
Fully Diluted 409,291,631* $1.40
$1.20
Market $217 Million $1.00
Capitalization $0.80
$0.60
(approximately, as of July 31, 2011)
$0.40
*Including 2.5 million shares to be issued under the Company Share Compensation Plan
$0.20
$0.00
29

30. Reserve Summary
December 31, 2010 TSX:CRK
PROBABLE MINERAL RESERVE
Gold Grade Ounces
Project Deposit Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes
(g/t) Gold
Burnside Brocks Creek 7.1 34,000 8.6 9,300
Cosmo Deeps 3.1 3,100,000 4.2 420,000
Howley 1.0 340,000 1.6 18,000
North Point 1.0 55,000 2.3 4,000
Princess Louise 1.0 200,000 1.5 9,700
Mottrams 1.0 980,000 1.2 39,000
Pine Creek Kohinoor 1.0 290,000 1.9 18,000
Cox 1.0 500,000 1.6 26,000
International 1.0 1,300,000 1.5 65,000
Gandys 1.0 480,000 1.7 26,000
South Enterprise 1.0 420,000 2.0 27,000
TOTAL 7,699,000 2.7 662,000
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability
Gold Price: $US1000/oz
$A:$US 0.91
Note: Mineral Reserves are included in Mineral Resources. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Depleted for mining as at December
31, 2010 and does not include any depletion for mining since such date.
The Mineral Reserve estimate was reviewed and optimized by Mark Edwards who is a “qualified person” as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 and has supervised the preparation
of the technical information and data included in this news release. The mineral resource estimate was generated using the following parameters:
• Models used have been reviewed and optimized by Mark Edwards and Fleur Muller
• Model technique is Ordinary Kriging, Multiple Indicator Kriging or Inverse Distance (review NI43-101 for more details)
• Mineralization wireframes conducted on 0.4-2g/t material with a minimum width of 1-2m depending on deposit and mineralization styles
• High grade top cut used of 2-40g/t depending on statistical review of sample results
• 1m metre samples with core half core or split RC samples used in models
• Samples were generally submitted to NAL and analyzed using 50g fire assay with AAS finish, some samples were submitted to umpire laboratory for QAQC purposes
30

31. Resource Summary
December 31, 2010 TSX:CRK
M+I MINERAL RESOURCE INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCE
Gold Grade Gold Grade
Project Tonnes Ounces Gold
(g/t) Tonnes (g/t) Ounces Gold
Mt Bundy*A 20,241,000 1.0 664,800 10,513,000 1.0 350,800
Burnside* 16,553,330 2.4 1,268,500 18,679,800 2.2 1,323,200
Union Reefs 239,000 2.4 18,200 3,740,000 1.7 204,200
Pine Creek 5,528,000 1.6 288,600 2,347,000 2.4 183,200
Maud Creek* 9,288,000 3.1 935,000 1,072,000 2.4 82,000
Total 51,849,330 1.9 3,175,100 36,351,800 1.8 2,143,400
*Includes Underground Resources
A
Crocodile Gold holes 80% interest in the Rustlers Roost deposit which is included in this Project
Please Note: Mineral Resources include Mineral Reserves. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Due to
the uncertainty of measured, indicated or inferred mineral resources, these mineral resources may never be upgraded to proven and probable mineral reserves.
Calculated at a gold price of US$1,000>/oz and exchange rate of $A0.91:US$1.00 ) and contained within optimizing pit shells using current operating costs
MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT (Other Commodities)
INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCE
Project Deposit Commodity Cut-off Tonnes Grade (ppm) Contained metal
Lead 1.0g/t Au 3,175,000 7,595 53,163,000 pounds
Iron Blow Zinc 1.0g/t Au 3,175,000 32,823 229,750,000 pounds
Burnside Silver 1.0g/t Au 3,175,000 101 10,200,000 ounces
C
Thunderball Uranium 200ppm 316,800 796 556,000 pounds
C
Crocodile Gold has a 30% free carried interest in this deposit
31

32. Investor Contact Info
TSX:CRK
Chantal Lavoie www.crocgold.com
President and CEO Find us on
416-861-2964
clavoie@crocgold.com
Investor Relations
Rob Hopkins
416-861-5899
info@crocgold.com
Union Reefs Mill
A Member of the Forbes & Manhattan Group of Companies 32