Cosmic Order & Non-being: Franz Bardon, Modern Spirituality's Erratic Sources, Will, Self-Cognition & Faith

Cosmic Order & Non-being: Franz Bardon,
Modern Spirituality'sErraticSources, Will,
Self-Cognition& Faith
The present article is the slightly revised version of a letter that I sent to a
spiritual disciple a few years ago. It contains my response to few questions
about Franz Bardon's definition of Will in his Questions & Answers. Franz
Bardon (1909-1958) was a leading European Spiritualist and Mystic of the
20th c. I add few scanned pages of this book for reference (Merkur
Publishing Inc., USA 1998). It goes without saying that, despite my
different approach to several topics discussed in this book, I strongly
recommend it to the interested reader with a background in Divine Studies
and Spirituality.
Basically, I divided the text of my response into eleven units and, to
facilitate the reader, I presented a Table of Contents in the beginning. The
titles of the units are in block letters, whereas my disciple's brief letter and
several quotes are in italics.
Table of Contents
I. THE THREE LEVELS OF THE SPIRITUAL WORLD
II. THE THREE PARTS OF THE HUMAN BEING
III. BIPOLARITY AS THE NATURAL CONDITION OF HUMAN
CHARACTER
IV. 4TH - 3RD MILLENNIUM BCE ORIENT (MESOPOTAMIA & EGYPT):
THE UNIQUE SOURCE OF HUMAN CIVILIZATION AND THE PEAK
OF HUMAN SPIRITUALITY & INTELLECT
V. CREATION IS EMANATION
VI. WHAT IS WILL, AND FROM WHAT ELEMENT IT DERIVES
VII. OCEAN (SOFT WATERS) & SEA (SALT WATERS) - FIRE IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL ELEMENT
VIII. FIAT LUX! LIGHT IS AN EMANATION OF ETHER, NOT FIRE!
IX. NON-BEING AS PART OF THE CREATION, SATAN & THE
ANTICHRIST
X. ONE'S TRUE SELF, WILL AND SUBCONSCIOUS
XI. SELF-COGNITION, SPIRITUAL CONSCIOUSNESS, WILL,
THINKING, BELIEF AND FAITH
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dear A,
Thank you very much for your email, news, and questions!

I was waiting them; in addition, congratulations for your ceaseless efforts
to improve your spiritual status!
I. THE THREE LEVELS OF THE SPIRITUAL WORLD
As regards Franz Bardon philosophy's introductory book, I am glad that
you stopped on the first page (actually p. 13, which is the main text's first
page) and more specifically in the first two paragraphs.
I will first briefly answer your questions and then expand. So, the main
part of my mail will be after the end of yours.
Dear Prof. Shamsaddin,
I hope you are doing well.
I am reading Franz Bardon's book.
Whilst making notes of Franz Bardon's book, I am very aware that I cannot
absorb these ideas without further explanation so they make sense.
Please could you clarify the below points:
1. Will
A. What is the connection between the will and a wish?
God created the spiritual and the material worlds, which means that not
even the spiritual world in its entirety is / can be eternal.
The spiritual world is distinguished by humans in three levels:
- the 'astral' level (this term, preferred by New Age ideologists and
propagandists, is biased and unjustified to some extent and it truly
corresponds to the) lower spiritual level
- the middle spiritual level
- the upper spiritual level
The above distinction may be unclear to you; so, I will now try it make it
somewhat understandable.
The upper spiritual level is the end of all pure and righteous souls that will
merge with God after the Final Judgment (so, not at the End of Times/Al
Yom al Ahar, but at the End of the World / Al Yom al Qiyamah). Angels and
other top spiritual hierarchies are exclusively part of this sphere which, as
you can imagine, includes many layers of importance and involves many
stages of the Creation. The epicenter of this sphere is Allah who is also
manifested in all stages and levels of Creation as well. This part of soul is
not easily accessible to humans; one must eliminate totally his materialistic
ego to possibly activate one's connection with the upper part of one's soul.
Few manage to achieve this while being in this material life.
The middle spiritual level encompasses the human souls and many
exclusively spiritual hierarchies. The middle level of one's soul is possible

for a human to access after long and systematic spiritual exercise, focus, and
elimination of thoughts, feelings, desires, and other material concerns.
Fully energizing one's connection with this level of soul offers a person the
ability to act as per the scope of the Creation and empowers the person with
capacities that are thought to be absolutely impossible by today's miserably
materialistic (and therefore unbelieving) people. One can
- walk in the air, in the surface or in the depth of the sea,
- go (with the material body) through walls, mountains and rocks,
- transport one's body at a speed as high as that of the light,
- take different forms (that of a lion, a mosquito, a tree or an object),
- accumulate instantly the knowledge contained within millions of books,
- be present in a place without being visible to those who are there,
- incite fear and respect to the wildest animals that will run away upon
seeing the person,
- move to different moments of the time (and thus see and hear historically
known or unknown persons),
- understand-speak-read-write earlier unknown (to that person) languages,
- stand without a problem in front of a shooting gun (and magnetize the
bullet so that it falls down before hitting the person or make it pass
through the body without having any effect) or canon,
- make a military aircraft fall,
- survive in the middle of any explosion (nuclear included), and so on.
Such person can
- emit light from the body or illuminate it from within,
- transfer part of his power to others, and
- perform other actions that today's unbelievers stupidly consider as
'miracles'.
The lower spiritual level contains the lower part of the human souls and
many other exclusively categories of spiritual beings. When it comes to the
human soul's lower spiritual level (which is mistakenly called 'astral'), this
revolves around the possibility that many people have to move to other
locations with their lower spiritual body ('astral voyages'), which has only
the form and the appearance of their material body, although being purely
spiritual. Through use of this lower spiritual body, people can appear to
others as ghosts, visit them in their dreams, speak to them as if they were
next to them and without anybody else hearing, influence others' opinion,
guide them or mislead them without the others' understanding, prevent a
bad occurrence, and so on.
After the death of the material body, the lower spiritual (astral) body gets
decomposed into the five elements and it then disappears, leaving the soul
(middle and upper levels) totally disconnected from the material world. I
can expand much on this, but this is not the correct moment.

Bear only in mind that the soul's middle level is also composed of the five
elements, but the soul's upper level is exclusively composed of ether, the
primordial 'substance' or 'dimension', which is what people in the Late
Antiquity used to call 'quintessence', i.e. the primary 'substance' or
'dimension' of Allah.
Ether is what Allah is 'made of' (if we can make this aphorism!), and
through Ether, Allah is present everywhere, because Ether is present
everywhere in all beings, spiritual and material; this does not mean that
Ether is not part of the Creation. Ether is the very beginning of the
Creation. But I am digressing.
II. THE THREE PARTS OF THE HUMAN BEING
While in life, every human being is said to be composed of his soul, body
and character; in fact, what is called 'character' is the most commonly
visible manifestation of the astral body at the material.
The body is situated at the material level; it is activated by the character /
astral body.
There are three main sectors of human character: the intellect & the senses,
the feelings, and the desires. The connection between the astral and the
material bodies occurs by the means of bodily organs and the nerve
network (nervous system): the brain (mind-intellect-senses), the heart
(feelings), and the abdominal cavity (desires).
Every soul's (and therefore person's) individuality guarantees - as per
above - a different perception, a different standpoint, a different set of
thoughts, a different array of feelings, and a different range of desires.
So, to come to your initial question ("the connection between the will and a
wish), I have to say that the will is an expression of the intellect (mind /
brain) whereas the wish is an expression of either the feelings or the desires
of the person.
Many people confuse their wishes with their will. Sometimes, defective
education, poor culture, and lack of self-knowledge are the reasons for this
confusion (so they are personal, not social).
I wish to become a lawyer.
I wish to help my father.
I wish to eat this cake.
All three 'wishes', expressed by the same person, are not identical to one
another; they differ not only in terms of action involved (as described by
the three verbs) or object concerned (as defined by the three nouns) but
mainly in relation to their nature.

In the first case, you have the expression of the intellect / and of a will.
In the second case, you have the expression of a feeling.
In the third case, you have the expression of a desire.
Many confused people take the 'will' as a 'wish' and vice versa. Confused
people customarily fail to see the difference between will and wish.
III. BIPOLARITY AS THE NATURAL CONDITION OF HUMAN
CHARACTER
Even worse, confused people consider their will, their feeling, and their
desire as 'normal' and 'rightful'; this is anyone's guess! It can be normal and
rightful, but it can also be quite the opposite.
Only critical thinking is the process that can eventually lead to the correct
evaluation of a case in this regard; but critical thinking presupposes always
another function of the human being, a function of the utmost importance.
Who are the confused people?
Mainly those for whom one can say "there is much unsaid within them".
Theirs is a catastrophic way of life; it is a form of oppression or, to put it
correctly, self-oppression. No one lives a proper human life, if one leaves
much unsaid within oneself.
No one can deal with any situation properly without speaking within
oneself about it and in truth, which automatically means a bipolar form of
being or an interpolation. Ignoring, neglecting or disregarding the truth
inside oneself is the reason of many wrong and disastrous reactions, grave
sins, and overall failure in life.
Self-oppression is always evil; by this, I don't mean that, as soon as one
girl feels a sexual attraction to another girl (or boy to boy), the girl (or the
boy) must 'avoid self-oppression' and satisfy the abominable desire (which
is what all the evil-minded persons in the West and worldwide 'advise').
Quite contrarily, they must accept it as a 'reality' at the personal level, and
truthfully speak to their inner self, asking why this desire appeared. Then,
starts the bipolar conversation inside that person, and the person gets
engaged in the true battle of the life.
Otherwise, trying to deny the reality of the desire leads to self-oppression,
and this will generate extremely negative results on the character of the
person. Without eventually satisfying the abnormal desire, the self-
oppressed person will become a negative pole in the society, because of the

inevitable, terrible and lifelong consequences of the self-inflicted
oppression (the fact of leaving much unsaid with oneself).
B. What is the aspect of the will as you previously suggested it is not the fire
element as suggested by Franz Bardon.
Here, you refer to unit 1 of Bardon's text. Re-read that unit now in the light
of the above, and you will see how great the distance between Bardon and
my approach is.
IV. 4TH - 3RD MILLENNIUM BCE ORIENT (MESOPOTAMIA & EGYPT):
THE UNIQUE SOURCE OF HUMAN CIVILIZATION AND THE PEAK
OF HUMAN SPIRITUALITY & INTELLECT
The basic mistake that follows Bardon across his lengthy books and
treatises is the disregard of the primordial element, the Ether. However, I
must admit that he accepts its existence (whereas most of the Freemasons,
and all of the Jesuits and the Zionists do not), but he does it in a rather odd
manner that excludes Ether from the reality of most circumstances that
occur on the material levels, which is indeed incredible.
His approach is that out of Ether emanated four elements (water, air, earth,
and fire - which is wrong) and that everything in the material world is
appended to the said four elements, because Ether exists in all four
elements but not independently - which is an outrage and a blasphemy (it
is tantamount to excluding God from the Universe!).
The reason for this misperception is that Bardon's sources were very narrow
and limited; it is the same with many spiritualists and mystics of his days
(20th c.), with all the modern philosophers (15th-20th c.), and with modern
sheikhs and imams of Islam, Christian theologians, Jewish rabbis, Hindu,
Buddhist and other priests. The problem is as simple as that:
For what parts of Human Spiritual, Religious and Intellectual Heritage
have been excavated, deciphered, known, studied, interpreted, accurately
perceived and eventually understood today, the theoretical basis of all the
aforementioned categories of thinkers and mystics is minimal.
None of them studied Ancient Sumerian, Akkadian - Assyrian-Babylonian,
Egyptian, Elamite, Hittite, Hurrian divine literature, holy books, religious
texts, which constitute the source of all later civilizations, cultures, divine
studies (: spiritual sciences), mysticisms - esoterisms, cosmogonies,
wisdoms, religions, traditions, literatures, sciences, arts, and philosophies.
This is something that few realize and even fewer are ready to accept,
because it destroys fake faiths and vicious agendas altogether.

Without Ancient Sumerian, Akkadian - Assyrian-Babylonian, Egyptian,
Elamite, Hittite, and Hurrian civilizations, there would not be Flood, there
would not be Noah, there would not be Hebrews, Israelites and Jews, there
would not be Exodus from Egypt and Moses, there would not be any
ancient state called 'Israel' with David and Solomon as kings, there would
not be prophets, there would not be Jesus, there would not be Christianity,
there would not be Muhammad, and there would not be Islam.
All other posterior civilizations, nations, religions, and historical persons
existed thanks to some of the aforementioned. Every antecedent
civilization, nation, religion, historical person or historical stage
predetermined to large extent the posterior. It is therefore totally
impossible to understand the posterior without duly studying the earlier.
Contrarily to the nonsensical speeches and texts of the ignorant sheikhs -
imams and of the fake academia of today's decayed, worthless and useless
Muslim World, it is not the Holy Quran that reconfirms Ancient Egyptian
and Assyrian-Babylonian sources, but exactly the opposite.
So, later the source of study and the point of reference of one modern
thinker, intellectual or mystic is, less credible his base of spiritual doctrine
becomes.
Franz Bardon belongs to a generation that idealized Classical and Late
Antiquity, despised Christianity and Islam, and ignored the Ancient
Orient. The most detrimental trait of their vision and contributions is of
course related to their ignorance of the Ancient Orient. The reason for this
is that either in the Classical and the Late Antiquity or within Christianity
and Islam (all referred to as possible sources of contemporary thinkers and
mystics), the true originality of the Mankind (which can also be described
as the diachronic peak of human spirituality and intellect in 4th-3rd
millennium BCE Orient) had already been lost. For this to understand, you
have to view Human History as a series of falls and deteriorated decadence
which are predestined to stop and be reversed at the End of Tine.
Ancient Sumerian, Assyrian-Babylonian, and Egyptian Cosmogonies and
other holy texts represent in this regard the most authoritative source about
the Creation; some of these texts deal with topics not mentioned and not
discussed at all in later holy texts, the Quran included. These antediluvian
texts give a very different perception of the World and of the Creation than
what can be found in the later Oriental, Persian, Greek, Roman and Indian
sources to which Bardon and modern thinkers, mystics and intellectuals
used to refer to.
What came to me as a very striking discovery is that these Ancient Oriental
texts overwhelmingly demonstrate the veracity of several key excerpts of
the Quran (and this fact was actually the main reason for which I became
Muslim).

This very fact did indeed shed also light to my long lasted question why
the Western Orientalists prevented Muslims from having access to the then
newly deciphered Egyptian and Assyrian-Babylonian (in the 19th c.) and
Sumerian and Hittite (beginning of the 20th c.) texts.
In reality, they did not want them to be part of the discovery and they did
not want to allow them the opportunity to grasp the true meaning of those
texts that they later misinterpreted to Western and worldwide readers. At
the same time, they strongly pushed Muslims and, in general, all the
Oriental and African nations to disregard these discoveries, writings,
literatures, holy texts, and historical - religious sources forever and to focus
on their later and local stuff (Islamic, Hindu, Confucian and Buddhist),
when the supreme essence of human spirituality and intellect and the true
meaning of all words had already been lost (in the Classical and the Late
Antiquity as well as in Christian and Islamic times).
V. CREATION IS EMANATION
No one can ever grasp any portion of the meaning of the Creation, if one
fails to understand the reality of the processes of the Emanation. Emanation
can be spiritual or material.
This means automatically that the universes (spiritual and material) were
not created "ab ovo", and that the so-called 'Big Bang' theory is Satanic.
Everything originates from Ether; then, the Soft Waters were separated
from the Salt Waters. The process led to the emanation of the Air. Last to
emanate was the Earth - as element of the spiritual world.
Similarly, the material universe was created in a manner totally opposite to
all modern nonsensical theories expressed on this topic; in fact, there are no
solar systems and there are no galaxies. All these fantasies are indeed parts
of the deception that the world-ruling Satanic powers have gradually,
methodically and tyrannically imposed during the last five centuries. The
epitome of Satanism in today's world is the heliocentric dogma which is an
entire falsehood and which is - quite tragically and surely terminally for
today's Islam - accepted as 'true' by almost all Muslim 'scholars', 'sheikhs',
'imams', etc.
All human civilizations from the earlier Oriental cultures to Islam accepted
the geocentric truth. Starting in the 15th c., the diffusion of the heliocentric
(or Copernican) deception ushered the world into the final decadence that
leads to the End of Times.
VI. WHAT IS WILL, AND FROM WHAT ELEMENT IT DERIVES

So, to answer your question about the element (not 'aspect') of which the
Will depends, I have to say that this is the Ether. But ..............
This is NOT the 'will' that you know!
The will that you know is the will of your intellect, of your mind.
Do never confuse the mind or the intellect with the soul!
The mind, the intellect and the thought, pretty much like the feelings and
the desires are material functions. Lenin was very right saying that the
thought is the supreme function of the material world.
The soul does not think. The Angels do not think. The demons do not
think. All the hierarchies of the spiritual beings do not think. Thought is a
very low, purely materialistic, ability. Same with the material endeavor that
is called 'knowledge'. After the astral (lower spiritual) body is decomposed
into its elements, all this 'knowledge' is dissolved.
Assuming that one soul can come to life in another body (a process which is
very rare but possible), this happens without the soul 'bringing' along the
previously accumulated, material knowledge and thoughts.
Is there any will in a soul? Yes! But the spiritual Will is very, very different
from the material 'will' of the mind /the intellect. Its difference is very
essential, because it emanates from the soul's self-cognition as an
independent entity with a fully assessed identity in total incorporation
within the spiritual universe. This means that there is no 'ego' in a human
soul; 'ego' was developed only in negative spiritual hierarchies, the
demons, etc. - purely to their destruction.
But a human mind's will is a manifestation of the intellect's self-cognition
as independent entity without a truly assessed identity and in total
disconnection from the spiritual universe. This is in fact the result of the
Fall (or - if you want - of the many, successive falls) of the Mankind. The
human mind, contrarily to the human soul, develops an 'ego', although the
Man was not created for this perspective. It is an unnecessary development
of catastrophic consequences. The only possible salvation for every human
is therefore the total elimination of the 'ego'; this is otherwise called as
'return of a human to his/her own soul'.
So, if the spiritual (middle - upper level) Will originates from / depends on
Ether, the lower spiritual (astral) - material will originates from / depends
on the Salt Waters.
VII. OCEAN (SOFT WATERS) & SEA (SALT WATERS) - FIRE IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL ELEMENT

What Bardon and others, since the days of the Late Antiquity, call 'Fire' is
not an original element, but a later emanation of one of them. It emanated
from the Salt Waters.
If the terms Soft Waters and Salt Waters appear clear, succinct and
meaningful to you (and for this purpose I use them), you have to know that
in ancient literatures they were not used like this.
Today, you and the rest of the world confuse two terms that were used in
the past within the context of a striking contradiction: Ocean and Sea.
You think that the same type of water is called 'sea' in rather 'closed' basins
(Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, Black Sea, Baltic Sea, North Sea) and 'ocean'
in 'open', inter-continental spaces (Indian, Atlantic, Pacific, etc).
If one examines the situation today, one will agree that the type of water
contained in either a sea or in an ocean is the same. However, this did not
happen in the past, and when I say 'past', I mean before the Flood. The
disasters caused at that time ended up with the formation of the present,
abnormal situation.
You have therefore to consider the present world as 'abnormal' also in this
issue.
The idiotic, Satanic sheikhs of today's fake Islam know nothing of all this,
because
1. their reading of the Quran is false, fake, worthless, useless to them, and
most-offensive to God
2. their overwhelming darkness and total ignorance of the Islamic Times'
Spirituality, Transcendental Wisdom, Astrology - Astronomy, Alchemy,
Magic, Mysticism and Royal Art irreversibly places them out of Islam
(because their claims are all fake) and
3. their ignorance of earlier Oriental sources is total, and this condition
disables spiritually everyone, preventing him from speaking truthfully
about Islam.
This is so because first, the true Islam is the Code of the Creation; second,
Islam antedates the Creation of the Man; third, Islam was therefore
continuously present among pre-Islamic nations, cultures and civilizations,
and fourth, simple reason suffices to make anyone understand that the
earlier eventually influences the later, and so there is at least the need for
every Muslim to crosscheck and identify the roots of Islamic Spirituality,
Transcendental Wisdom, Sciences, Literature, Philosophy and Art within
the context of the Ancient Oriental Civilizations (mainly Mesopotamia and
Egypt, but also Anatolia, Canaan, Iran and Central Asia).
But among ancient civilizations (and there is a vast documentation on this
topic), there was a very big difference between the words 'Sea' (which

meant 'Salt Waters') - Tiamat and 'Ocean' (which meant 'Soft Water') - Apsu
(the two terms are Assyrian - Babylonian). Sea and Ocean were then very
clearly understood as the exact opposites. However, even this was lost in
later periods of History and lower stages of human intellect, notably the
Ancient Greek and Roman times.
All major civilizations considered that, around the Earth (thought to be
composed of one sizeable unit of landmass), ran an enormous circular
current, which they called Ocean. They described it as exclusively
composed of Soft Waters that did not intermingle with the Salt Waters of
the coastal seas and basins (such as the Mediterranean Sea, the Red Sea, the
North Sea, and so on). This was the antediluvian known Order of the
Creation.
This idea was due to their superior knowledge of the Earth before the
Flood, which was very different from the situation ensued after that terrible
destruction. There were actually no proper continents, but one rather
circular surface of Earth surrounded by the Ocean of Soft Waters.
In that immense aquatic body, there were also layers: the upper layer was
composed of Soft Waters, and then progressively there were alternating
layers of Salt and Soft Waters, with the lowest being that of Salt Waters.
Because of this situation, before the Flood, the sky had a very different
color and it looked like turquoise.
For this reason, the turquoise stone was considered as truly precious and
exquisite by all highly civilized ancient nations, which were known for
having immense temples that functioned as the Abode of the Sacred and
served therefore as esoteric ateliers, religious edifices, academic schools,
research centers, and libraries. In striking opposition to the later, ignorant
and barbarian priesthoods of Greece and Rome, the Sumerian, Assyrian -
Babylonian, Hurrian, Hittite and Egyptian temples accommodated
altogether initiates and theurgists, erudite explorers and wise scientists,
hierophants and sophisticated sacerdotal hierarchies that reflected the
supreme level of spiritual dominance and material authority that they had
attained and which is unknown and even impossible to the present world.
As per above Unit V, all original Cosmogonies stipulate that the really first
act of Creation is the separation of the Soft Waters from Salt Waters. This
point relates to the transition from 'Non Being' into 'Being'. This is a vast
subject that is almost not dealt with within later and lower Cosmogonies
(Hebrew, Greek, Roman, Christian or Islamic), but it is extensively
described and discussed within the corpuses of Assyrian-Babylonian and
Egyptian literatures.
If I expand on these topics, it is due to the fact that no one can ever
understand the nature and the substance of the five elements as well as the

real meaning of the Creation without realizing some key points related to
these issues.
The pre-cosmic separation of the Soft Waters from the Salt Waters could not
have been effectuated without the commanding order and authority of
Ether. But this already reveals much about the pre-Creation situation and
the 'chaos' that is always said to have been prevailing then. In addition, it
has - for us - a revelatory information of the utmost importance.
It makes us understand that the nature of the Creation is such that God can
make the entire universe totally collapse, disintegrate and disappear in just
one second. Of course, ignorant sheikhs and priests can also say this. But
they cannot say how! If asked, they will reply that God is omnipotent,
which is also true and useless at the same time, because in and by itself it
does not explain anything.
However, God can truly make the entire universe disappear in a second,
because the universe was created in a manner enabling this. The manner
you already know: separation of the Soft from the Salt Waters - even before
the creation of Light. Light is an emanation of Ether.
VIII. FIAT LUX! LIGHT IS AN EMANATION OF ETHER, NOT FIRE!
At this point, I must also add that it is extremely idiotic to attribute Light to
Fire as Franz Bardon and many other modern spiritual theoreticians,
mystics, and philosophers suggest, being influenced by their mistaken
readings of Zoroastrianism and various Gnosticisms.
If Light had been due to / emanated from Fire, the entire universe would
have been filled with smoke, we would not have been able to see anything,
and an overwhelming darkness would have prevailed all over.
Believing that Fire can create Light is an oxymoron; it is tantamount to
thinking that demons can perform Angelic deeds. And there is worse! In
fact, if you are in a totally dark room and you set a match, what you will be
able to see is a mere resemblance of Light; in reality, this a counterfeit light
or, if you want, a negative reflection of Light.
This topic is truly vast, and it is for this reason that I totally oppose the
seemingly innocent idea of meditating in front of a candle; this can only
bring calamitous results that the victimized performers fail to assess.
IX. NON-BEING AS PART OF THE CREATION, SATAN & THE
ANTICHRIST
The separation of the Soft Waters from the Salt Waters, as part of the
Creation, means automatically that the 'Non Being' is also part of the
Creation.

Following extensive analysis of Assyrian-Babylonian and Egyptian sacred
texts relating to the topic, and reconfirming my early conclusions with
spiritual experiments, I have every reason to believe and accept that Salt
Waters represent actually the dimension of Non Being within the Order of
the Creation, being actually a component of the spiritual and material
universes.
The separation of the Soft from the Salt Waters is the way Ether helped
purify the pre-cosmic Soft Waters and then utilized them as the foremost
element of the Creation.
With the emanation of the Air and the Earth, the order of the Creation was
finally complete.
At this point, I can repeat - so that you understand better -three lines that I
first included as per above Unit VI:
So, if the spiritual (middle - upper level) Will originates from / depends on
Ether, the lower spiritual (astral) - material will originates from / depends
on the Salt Waters.
It becomes now automatically understood: without prior elimination of the
'ego', involving the material & astral mind and/or character, every human
being is driven to non-existence (Non-being).
Never forget that non-existence (Non-being) is not the Hell (which is an
existing part of the spiritual universe), but something far worse!
Jesus, attacking his times' Jews, and more particularly the Scribes and the
evil Pharisees (the Jewish priests), revealed much on the topic - for those
who truly understand through the lines and have access to the original
sources. Jesus said (Gospel of John, 8:39-45):
"They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto
them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham. 40
But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have
heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then
said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even
God. 42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for
I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent
me. 43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my
word. 44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will
do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because
there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he
is a liar, and the father of it. 45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me
not".

In fact, Jesus denied (8:39) that the Jews of his times were the descendants
of the Hebrews (: Abraham) and he accused them of being the offspring of
the father of Satan (8:44). The modern English translations are - all -
deliberately false at this point. The wording is wrong: " Ye are of your father
the devil". The Latin translation (Vulgata) is very correct: "vos ex patre
diabolo estis" (: you are from the Father of the Devil). And so it is in the
original Ancient Greek text: "ὑμεῖς ἐκ τοῦ πατρὸς τοῦ διαβόλου ἐστέ" (: you
are from the Father of the Devil).
Jesus' accusations reveal that the origin of Satan is indeed pre-cosmic and
that he emanates from the Non-being (Salt Waters) part of the Creation; this
shows that, literally speaking, God did not 'create' Satan, but the emanation
of the Negativity was a predestination inherent to the Creation. This gives
full reason to the Creation of Man by God with the destiny to exterminate
Satan and his demons and to generate a new universal order with the Sea
eliminated (or 'imprisoned' or 'contained'). This justifies also the numerous
eschatological traditions that portray the End Times' Antichrist (Masih al
Dajjal) coming out of the Sea (as it was first said in the Hittite Apocalyptic
Epic Ullikummi and then repeated in John's Revelation).
But I am digressing. Here I think that with the above I completed my
answer.
C. What is the right power needed to make the wish manifest?
I guess you mean the will here.
X. ONE'S TRUE SELF, WILL AND SUBCONSCIOUS
Of course, there is Will and will - as I already said.
There are different prerequisites for each.
For a materialistic person and a wrong mystic / spiritualist, there are several
ways to achieve the materialization of a will or feeling or desire or 'wish' -
as per each different case.
For a person relying on God, 'making one's will or wish manifest' cannot
possibly be a priority. Discovering one's soul, encountering one's inner and
true being, operating one's own electromagnetic fields, and commanding
one's own electromagnetic fluids are the priority. Self-cognition must
precede any formation of will. If you don't know who you are, you cannot
possibly want - and if you do, in reality you execute someone else's will
that managed to penetrate and inhabit your subconscious (that you don't
control).
Only when a person (character) meets one's own true being (one's own
soul) - with which today's society, modern education, and in general, the

fallen world (in which we live) totally prevented the person from being
connected -, can the person (character) at last understand the purpose of
coming into the material world and the scope of work that is asked from
that person to carry out. Then, unity with one's true self is guaranteed.
To go back to the materialistic persons and the wrong mystics / spiritualists
of the modern world, I must admit that their mistakes lead them inevitably
to disaster. They thought that they materialized their will and that they
made their wish manifest, but this was only a deception.
In reality they didn't materialize their own will and they didn't make their
own wish manifest, but theirs was the will and the wish of one demon (or
more) who found its way to the subconscious of that person.
The subconscious part of the mind is a material-astral dimension of every
person that must be always kept as it is at the moment the person is born:
totally empty. This is another vast subject of its own, but already
understanding that the subconscious must be kept empty and trying to act
accordingly can help everyone mark a great advance in one's life.
The subconscious represents the element of the Salt Waters in each person.
As it is tantamount to Non-Being, it must be kept empty; every single
reflection (or idol or image) stored there brings the person one step closer to
Non-Being.
In the societies of the Fall, it is impossible not to add unnecessary stuff in
one's subconscious; this occurs already infancy and before the baby
becomes a child (in the 'toddler stage'). Then, these negative idols (or
images or reflections) function like mirrors and attract a myriad of demons,
who manipulate these images in a way to induce humans to improper and
sinful deeds, and I guess you know the consequences and all the rest.
Thought control and elimination, mind self-control, feeling restriction,
meditation, elimination of desires, abstention from materialistic concerns
and pleasures (anything from food to sex to leisure) are some of the
methods that help empty one's subconscious.
It is as simple as that: without emptying your subconscious and without
eliminating your ego, you cannot achieve self-cognition, and as long as you
are far from self-cognition, you must not 'want' anything.
I could expand much on the different methods employed by persons
(without empty subconscious) to materialize their own will and make their
own wish manifest prior to achieving self-cognition. But it would be
purposeless; it was always calamitous, and the entire world is about to be
met with final annihilation due to precisely this nefarious and ominous
situation.

XI. SELF-COGNITION, SPIRITUAL CONSCIOUSNESS, WILL,
THINKING, BELIEF AND FAITH
D. Does the fact that this is the first paragraph mean that it is the most
important? For example, belief is the second paragraph.
With this question, you reach a very critical point of considerations about
the spiritual world. Yes, this is perhaps the first question one should ask, if
one considers the form (and not the contents) of Bardon's presentation.
Why speaking first about (or why defining first) one's will, and not one's
belief?
This sort of questions / considerations are existential / fundamental. What
comes first as manifestation of a person's identity?
Here, you will face the multitude of modern philosophers (which means
mainly Western, i.e. basically Anti-Christian, Freemasonic and Zionist) who
specify that the basic expression of each and every material being is
his/her/its will.
This is a fundamental aberration; it consists in one of the few major
mistakes, due to which one loses forever the chance to return to mental
normalcy. Many centuries ago, in the early 17th c., one of Europe's most
revered but most disastrous and most evil philosophers, Descartes
(Cartesius), said in Latin the notorious sentence: "Cogito ergo sum", which
means lit. 'I think, therefore I am'.
Descartes played a determinant role in Modern European Philosophy and
there was not one modern philosopher who bypassed him; contrarily, all
referred to him with veneration, and every single European thinker
identified himself through a particular reference to Descartes.
Consequently, thought / thinking progressively became of primordial
importance for post-16th century Europeans, whereas this was not so
before. After Descartes, Belief and Faith started being viewed as less
important activities, endeavors or expressions of the human being.
The fake self-identification of the modern Europeans was therefore based
on Individual Thought (which is totally controlled by the Subconscious if
this is not fully emptied), and this situation brought forth the Will of the
fake humans who are deprived of self-cognition and identity.
It is all about how one human being is / can be self-defined.
This relates to what was called Gnosiology by the Ancient Greeks
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosiology).

Never confuse Gnosiology with Gnosis, the Gnostics, and the numerous
religious-philosophical systems of the Late Antiquity that are called
Gnosticisms!
Gnosiology (falsely called 'Epistemology' today) is indeed one of the five
parts of Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy:
- Metaphysics (concerning the Creation, the Cosmic Aeons, the Spiritual
World, the Soul, the Spiritual Hierarchies, God, the Interconnection
between the Spiritual and the Material Worlds, the Hereafter, the Destiny
of the Man),
- Logic (exploring valid Reasoning and Argumentation),
- Ethics or Moral Philosophy (identifying what is an ethical, just and proper
value),
- Esthetics (differentiating between the notions of Beauty and Ugliness),
and
- Gnosiology (specifying what is and what is not Knowledge, how we know
that we truly know, where the importance of Knowledge is placed, how we
learn, what we can know, etc).
As a matter of fact, due to a) the rise of the modern philosophical systems
and b) the formation of modern sciences, many major changes occurred
leading to a dramatic transformation / alteration of the traditional function
and operation of Philosophy after the 15th-16th c. in Western Europe.
Newly diffused concepts (like the concepts of 'usefulness' and 'profit')
deeply changed the nature of philosophical endeavor. For all ancient
philosophers, 'useful' was equal to trash; it was vulgar, hideous and even
barbaric; it was tantamount to worthless and valueless. This was very right
indeed, because all types of possible 'use' cannot possibly have any real
value. Everything one can buy has a price and a market worth; therefore it
cannot - by definition - have any real value, and it does not represent any
virtue.
Pretty much like modern, fake and 'indirect' democracy (which is a
counterfeit system at the antipodes of the ancient, 'direct' democracy), the
modern Western European 'philosophers' tried - in striking opposition with
the philosophers of ancient times - to setup useful systems and to control
modern thought, sciences, and the world of power (which they distorted,
falsified and called politics - a nonexistent, fake term).
So, Gnosiology was then obliterated by modern academia and those
'philosophers', who replaced it with what is rather called today Cognitive
Science (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science). Similarly, the
fake modern science of Psychology has nothing to do with the Soul (despite
the first component of the term; 'psyche' meaning 'soul' in Ancient Greek).
In fact, modern Cognitive Sciences have nothing to do with the processes of
self-cognition as undertaken by the soul and the mind. As academic
discipline, Cognitive Science is packed with preconceived ideas, farfetched
innuendos, and a high amount of aberrations that help setup the

troublesome and fake cognitive basis of the unfortunate and disoriented
modern humans. This falsehood was actually spread worldwide due to
academic, educational, intellectual and cultural colonialism.
Muslims have not been exempted in this regard, because, as I said, this
system was imposed worldwide and without reaction; not even one Hindu,
Buddhist, Eastern Christian, Confucian, Taoist or Muslim thinker,
intellectual or mystic was left there to identify and denounce the
preconceived schemes that were first elaborated and imposed in the West,
and second diffused among the followers of the afore-mentioned religions,
and of other faiths and cultures. Finally, this system forced the entire
modern world to totally lose every connection with their past and identity.
So, for the modern world's fake human being, the first element of self-
identification is the Will, and this is translated to thoughts, feelings and
desires.
This is the reason for which Franz Bardon starts with Will.
Certainly, this is all wrong, and more importantly, it is a terrible drawback
for anyone who wants to start an effort to discover and connect with one's
own soul.
At this point, I repeat three statements already included in Unit VI so that
you better assess their meaning thanks to what I presented in-between:
1) The mind, the intellect and the thought, pretty much like the feelings
and the desires are material functions.
2) The soul does not think.
3) Is there any will in a soul? Yes! But the spiritual Will is very, very
different from the material 'will' of the mind /the intellect. Its difference is
very essential, because it emanates from the soul's self-cognition as an
independent entity with a fully assessed identity in total incorporation
within the spiritual universe.
Due to these points, one can understand immediately that the spiritual
beings have another manner of identifying themselves, and this manner is
indeed very different from the expression of a human thought or the
manifestation of a human will. What is valid for all spiritual beings also
concerns the human souls.
As the creation of the material universe was a duplication of the creation of
the spiritual universe, every human being must adapt to its soul and thus
establish the correct concordances.
The premier identification of a created spiritual being or of a created soul is
the manner of its connection with the Creator; this is different in each and
every soul.

That's why it would be a mistake to make a sentence like "the premier
identification of a created spiritual being or of a created soul is its
connection with the Creator".
The correct definition refers to "the manner of" connection with the Creator
as "the premier identification of any created being".
What is the manner of a soul's connection with the Creator?
This is called Faith.
Faith is something you don't know, something most of today's people don't
know, something that is largely irrelevant of the simple belief. For today's
people, belief and faith are almost identical notions and concepts. But this
is wrong.
Look at how erroneous all modern followers of (the already distorted and
therefore fake) religions are! Read the following four sentences:
A- Christians believe that God is manifested as Trinity.
B- Muslims believe that Muhammad was the Prophet of God.
C- Communists believe that human ignorance and sheer fear made humans
believe in God.
D- Atheists believe that there is no God.
In all the above cases, you have in reality a superficial, meaningless, and
worthless attachment to various narratives; all cases are the same and
equally false. Because of this, many say - and they are right - that
'communism is a religion' and that 'atheists have a God, either they accept
this conclusion or not', meaning that each atheist is characterized by a
particular attachment to some thoughts and ideas - a situation which is
similar and equivalent to a Christian's attachment to a Christian narrative
and to Muslim's attachment to an Islamic narrative.
In fact, all these narratives have nothing to do with Faith. Faith is not this.
Look here at the extent to which 'faith' and 'belief' are confused in modern
dictionaries:
1: a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some
person or thing <her belief in God> <a belief in democracy> <I bought the
table in the belief that it was an antique.> <contrary to popular belief>
2 : something that is accepted, considered to be true, or held as an opinion :
something believed <an individual's religious or political beliefs>; especially
: a tenet or body of tenets held by a group <the beliefs of the Catholic
Church>

3 : conviction of the truth of some statement or the reality of some being or
phenomenon especially when based on examination of evidence <belief in the
validity of scientific statements>
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/belief
and
1 a : allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty <lost faith in the company's
president> b (1) : fidelity to one's promises (2) : sincerity of intentions <acted
in good faith>
2 a (1) : belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2) : belief in the traditional
doctrines of a religion b (1) : firm belief in something for which there is no
proof <clinging to the faith that her missing son would one day return> (2) :
complete trust
3 : something that is believed especially with strong conviction; especially : a
system of religious beliefs <the Protestant faith>
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith
You may have fast noticed that the two terms are practically speaking
interchangeable.
Here you will find a better portrait of the currently reigning confusion
among humans, and more importantly, among theologians:
As John Simpson and Nathan Ketsdever have stated, faith is not belief
without evidence. Faith is merely the extent of belief. In other words, if your
belief is so strong that it affects your actions and attitudes, it has become
faith. If you have complete confidence in something or someone, you have
faith. Faith is synonymous with the word, trust. Thus if someone is "faithful"
then they are someone you can have faith in.
Thus blind faith is having completely confidence in someone or something
without any reason to do so. It's typically used pejoratively. Hardly anybody
I know has a completely "blind faith" because even if their faith is based on
shaky or faulty reasoning, they usually have some reason or some story to
how they came to this faith.
For example if a child believes in Santa Claus so much that they have
complete confidence in his existence or reality, they have faith. But is it really
a blind faith? If you ask a child why they believe in Santa Claus, they might
say that they believe in Santa Claus because their parents said he exists. At
that point, it is no longer blind faith. They have SOME reasoning for this
faith in Santa Claus, even if it is not the best reason. They trust their parents,
who have their best interest at heart.
Now the term "blind faith" could alternatively mean, having faith in
something which you cannot observe scientifically. I believe this is the way
many atheists use the term. This use of the term however, is rhetorical abuse.

It is essentially claiming that unless something can be observed in a rigorous
scientific way, it is not reasoned and cannot be evidence. It is imposing an
evidential foundationalist philosophical worldview. The fact of the matter is
that human beings do not operate that way. If I have faith in the goodness of
my parents to me, I have not subjected their goodness to rigorous scientific
testing. Yet I have every reason to believe in their goodness and have faith in
them. Rigorous scientific observation is not the only path to knowledge and
the intellectually honest should reject any claim that it is.
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-differences-between-faith-belief-
hope-and-trust
Written by an Evangelical Christian, the above text is a high degree
certificate of real, complete, and consummate disbelief. Confusing belief
with faith is full proof of materialism; it automatically discredits whatever
a person may declare as his/her own faith. The person that makes an
equation between belief and faith knows no God, and if he/she says that
he/she believes in God, he/she is a liar and a hypocrite.
Look at what Jesus said about Faith:
But early in the morning, as he came back into the city, he hungered. 19And
seeing one fig-tree in the way, he came to it and found on it nothing but
leaves only. And he says to it, Let there be never more fruit of thee for ever.
And the fig-tree was immediately dried up.
Verily I say unto you, If ye have faith, and do not doubt, not only shall ye do
what [is done] to the fig-tree, but even if ye should say to this mountain, Be
thou taken away and be thou cast into the sea, it shall come to pass. 22 And
all things whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.
Gospel according to Matthew, ch. 21, v. 21-22
http://bibliaparalela.com/dbt/matthew/21.htm
This quotation is one of the excerpts that we find in the Christian Gospels
about Jesus' description of Faith.
Two other examples of Faith Prophet Jesus gave to his disciples personally:
22 Then Jesus made the disciples get into the boat and go on ahead to the
other side of the lake, while he sent the people away. 23 After sending the
people away, he went up a hill by himself to pray. When evening came, Jesus
was there alone; 24 and by this time the boat was far out in the lake, tossed
about by the waves, because the wind was blowing against it. 25 Between
three and six o'clock in the morning Jesus came to the disciples, walking on
the water. 26 When they saw him walking on the water, they were terrified.
“It's a ghost!” they said, and screamed with fear. 27Jesus spoke to them at
once. “Courage!” he said. “It is I. Don't be afraid!” 28 Then Peter spoke up.
“Lord, if it is really you, order me to come out on the water to you.” 29
“Come!” answered Jesus. So Peter got out of the boat and started walking on
the water to Jesus. 30 But when he noticed the strong wind, he was afraid and
started to sink down in the water. “Save me, Lord!” he cried. 31 At once Jesus

reached out and grabbed hold of him and said, “How little faith you have!
Why did you doubt?” 32They both got into the boat, and the wind died down.
Gospel according to Matthew, ch. 14, v. 22-32
The two examples involve: a. walking on the surface of the lake waters, and
b. stopping the wind.
Why did Peter started to sink?
Because of the so-called Law of Gravitation, which is a fake?
No!
But because he had ..... "little faith".
Faith is the spiritual power which is founded on absolute, spiritual self-
knowledge and self-identification acquired by means of instinctive
perception of the soul's connection with God. Every normal human can
have faith, and those who have it can exercise full and infinite control of
the matter and of the entire material world.
In the above excerpts, Jesus gives the example that by means of Faith one
man can remove an entire mountain from its place and throw it into the sea,
stop the wind, and walk on the surface of the water.
You may wish perhaps at this point to ask me about consciousness, and you
may eventually pretend that before Faith, Belief, and Will, one should start
discussing ontological matters by specifying consciousness as the
cornerstone of each and every human and as the very beginning of every
mental and spiritual activity.
Certainly, consciousness comes before will and before belief.
Before you expressed a desire to eat (when you were a few months old
baby), you felt your personal need to eat, and this is a manifestation of
consciousness.
Before you first heard of Islam (when you were a small child), you
identified yourself as an independent being.
Consciousness is tantamount to self-cognition and self-identification, but at
this level, we have to also make a clear distinction: there is mental-material
consciousness and there is spiritual consciousness, and in most of the cases
they differ greatly, because in today's fallen world, humans are
disconnected from their own spiritual self (i.e. their soul).
In every case, when a human is disconnected from his/her soul, his/her
mental-material consciousness is false.

In our fallen world, the path of one person to re-encounter one's soul and to
enact one's inherent spiritual powers is the definition of the person's
spirituality and religiosity. This can be achieved through many different
narratives and several spiritual methods.
Useless to add that persons, who understand the immense power of the
spiritual world, but fail in their personal path, sometimes make deals with
evil spirits, demons, and other negative spiritual entities and - through the
related initiation and subsequent exercise - they manage to achieve a
certain spiritual power. However, this is conditioned on many terms and, in
turn, it conditions the soul of these persons to spiritual slavery, permanent
punishment (Hell) or even total extinction (elimination in the Non Being).
Contrarily to the false mental-material consciousness, spiritual
consciousness is the true self-cognition (self-identification) of every person;
this implies that in spiritual terms, Consciousness is Faith and Faith is
Consciousness. They are identical to one another. Spiritual contact with
God is one with the affirmation of a soul's self-identification.
I have questions about the other paragraphs which I noted down but I do not
understand the meaning or context of the first paragraph and would like to
start from there.
As always wishing you the best
A
Best,
Shamsaddin

Cosmic Order & Non-being: Franz Bardon, Modern Spirituality's Erratic Sources, Will, Self-Cognition & Faith

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Cosmic Order & Non-being: Franz Bardon, Modern Spirituality's Erratic Sources, Will, Self-Cognition & Faith

Similar to Cosmic Order & Non-being: Franz Bardon, Modern Spirituality's Erratic Sources, Will, Self-Cognition & Faith (20)

More from Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

More from Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Cosmic Order & Non-being: Franz Bardon, Modern Spirituality's Erratic Sources, Will, Self-Cognition & Faith