SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 28
Contract Risk Assessment by using integrated systems
 Pedram Danesh-Mand, Planning & Risk Manager – Major Projects




3rd Annual Project Scheduling – Feb 2012                        QMTRA-01 Rev 3.0
Agenda

  Brief Introduction

      Planning & Risk Manager – Major Projects, UGL Infrastructure

      Power Generation, Water & Wastewater, Transport and Telecommunication

  Industry performance worldwide

  Current Industry Trends

  Success Factors in Major Projects

  “Risk Driver” Method vs Traditional Approach

  Integrated Risk Assessment System

      Estimate

      Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

      Time

      Cost

      Risk

                                                                              2
Project Delivery: Myths

  We have a good PM system in place, don’t worry.

  Trust our very experienced team. Everything’s fine.

  No problem, everything is under control.

  No worries, we have been there, done that.

  Please, we don’t need anything new.

  Another new system, another tool, again!




                                                                 O.K.
                                                Let’s have a look in the performance of
                                               some major projects worldwide, shall we?




                                                                                          3
Performance of Major Projects

            Engineering Projects                                           Oil and Gas Projects
            42% behind schedule                                            81% behind schedule




Ref: Managing the Risk of Delayed Completion in the 21st Century, Survey by Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), 2007   4
Performance of Major Projects

                                        Power Generation Projects
                                          66% behind schedule




Ref: Managing the Risk of Delayed Completion in the 21st Century, Survey by Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), 2007   5
Current Industry Trends

    Increasing demand for efficient and technologically complex solutions in shorter timescales and within

   tighter financial constraints;

    High demand for an accurate completion date, as required by many commercial and public benefit

   projects;

    A growing trend for employers to require the contractor to take more of the risk that is traditionally taken

   by the employer;

    A growth in the use of Design & Build (D&B), Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) and Engineer Procure

   and Construct Contracts (EPC); and

    Potentially devastating consequences of the failure to manage time in construction projects.



                                                                           O.K.
                                                       To identify the success factors, we need to
                                                              understand why projects fail!


Ref: Managing the Risk of Delayed Completion in the 21st Century, Survey by Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), 2007   6
Top 5 Causes of Failure

  REQUIREMENTS: Unclear, lack of agreement, lack of priority, contradictory, ambiguous, imprecise

  RESOURCES: Lack of resources, resource conflicts, turnover of key resources, poor planning

  SCHEDULES: Too tight, unrealistic, overly optimistic

  PLANNING: Based on insufficient data, missing items, insufficient details, poor estimate

  RISKS & OPPORTUNITIES: Unidentified or assumed, not managed




                                                               Ref: Strategies for Project Recovery,
                                                               A PM Solutions Research Report,
                                                               pmsolutions survey, 2011


                                                                                                       7
Successful EPC Contractor




                        R&O

                       Quality

                        T&C



                        Scope




                                 8
Traditional Approach



                       EPC Contract




          Estimate      Scheduling    R&O




                                            9
Traditional Approach

        PROJECT INFORM ATION                                              M onday, 16 January 2012                                             % of Cost % of Sell        VALUE          RECOVERY

TENDER NO:                                                                TC-3218                                                              Total m an Hours          Man Hours
PROJECT TITLE:                                                            Weddell Unit 3                                                       Civil                       3,364
CONSULTANT/CLIENT:                                                        Pow er & Water Corporation, NT                                       Mech                        11,854
POST TENDER NEGOTIATION DATE:                                             16-Jan-12                                                            Elect                       6,164
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME DURATION (Weeks)                        34                      8        Months                                         M anning                   Average          Peak
CONSTRUCTION SITE DURATION (Weeks)                             34                      8        Months                                         Civil                        10              16
DEFECTS LIABILITY PERIOD (Weeks)                               104                  24          Months                                         Mech                         28              45
REVISION AND ISSUE                                                                REVA0-1                                                      Elect                        17              28
                                                                                                                                                                           Value         Recovery
 (1-4) TOTAL DIRECT JOB COSTS (items 1-4)                                 TOTAL COST DJC (items 1-5)                                              51.17%    44.85%       $6,338,802.81

  (1)   PROJECT ELEMENTS, DIRECT COSTS                                                                   Total for section (1)                    40.79%    35.75%       $5,053,352.81

 1.1    Civil Works                Input f rom                            File                                                    07-Jun-11        9.13%        8.00%    $1,131,041.30
 1.2    Mechanical                 Input f rom                            File                                                    30-May-11       18.16%    15.92%       $2,249,906.72
 1.3    Electrical                 Input f rom                            File                                                    01-Jun-11       12.79%    11.21%       $1,584,404.79
 1.4    Recruitment
 1.4    Final Negotiation f igure generally f or w et w eather increase                                                                            0.71%        0.62%       $88,000.00
 1.5                                                                      File
  (2)   ENGINEERING (Refer SHT-2)                                                                        Total for section (2)                     8.12%        7.12%    $1,005,350.00

 2.1    UGL Engineering                                                   Engineering                                             09-May-11        7.62%        6.68%      $943,522.00
 2.2    Geotechnical Report & O&M Manuals                                                                                         09-May-11        0.50%        0.44%       $61,828.00
  (3)   General Specification Requirements (Refer SHT-3)                                                 Total for section (3)                     0.81%        0.71%      $100,100.00
 3.1    Preliminary Costs UGLi                                            Prelims               File                                               0.81%        0.71%      $100,100.00
 3.2    Preliminary Costs other                                                                 File
  (4)   COMM ISSIONING (Refer SHT-4)                                                                     Total for section (4)                     1.45%        1.27%      $180,000.00
 4.1    Commissioning costs UGLi                                          Admin                 Included in Admin below
 4.2    Commissioning Materials                                           Comissioning          File                                               1.45%        1.27%      $180,000.00
 4.3    Commissioning costs other                                                               File
 (5-9) TOTAL INDIRECT JOB COSTS (item s 5-9)                              TOTAL COST INDIRECTS (item s 5-9)                                       42.79%    37.49%       $5,302,192.18

  (5)   ADMINISTRATION (Refer SHT-5)                                                                     Total for section (6)                    28.90%    25.33%       $3,580,535.30
 5.1    Site Admin and Site Supervision Costs                             Admin                                                                   10.92%        9.57%    $1,352,868.94
 5.2    Site Engineering and Site Support Staf f                          Admin                                                                    7.44%        6.52%      $921,581.16
 5.3    Site Commissioning labour Costs                                   Admin                                                                    7.71%        6.76%      $955,220.13
 5.4    Head Off ice Support                                              Admin                                                                    2.44%        2.14%      $302,654.86
 5.5    Other admin costs         Recruitment Costs                                                                                                0.39%        0.34%       $48,210.20
  (6)   MOBILISATION Plant & Buildings (Refer SHT-6)                                                     Total for section (7)                    12.75%    11.16%       $1,579,350.00
 6.1    ( 7a) MOBILISATION & DEMOBILSA TION                            Mob & Demob                                                                 8.04%        7.05%      $996,060.00
 6.2    (7bi) SITE BUILDINGS                                                                                                                       0.69%        0.60%       $85,010.00
 6.3    (7bii) SITE CONNECTIONS                                                                                                                    1.00%        0.87%      $123,550.00
 6.4    (7biii) PLANT AND TOOLS                                                                                                                    2.09%        1.83%      $258,880.00
 6.5    (7biv) VEHICLES                                                                                                                            0.23%        0.20%       $28,900.00
 6.6    (7bv) SITE RUNNING COSTS                                                                                                                   0.44%        0.38%       $54,150.00
 6.6    Other - Principal's Site Of fice + Utility Pow er & Water Connections (PWC Mtg Darw in Addition)                                           0.26%        0.23%       $32,800.00
  (7)   COMM UNITY & ENVIRONMENT (Refer SHT-7)                            Comm & Env                     Total for section (8)                     0.09%        0.08%       $11,700.00

  (8)   HEALTH & SAFETY EQUIPM ENT (Refer SHT-8)                          Health & Saf ety               Total for section (9)                     1.05%        0.92%      $130,606.88
                                                                                                                                                                        Hedging Not
  (9)   HEDGING (refer to SHT-9)                                          BG & Hedge                     Total for section (10)
                                                                                                                                                                        Consi dered
(10-13) TOTAL ALLOWANCES (item s 10-13)                                   TOTAL COST ALLOWANCES (item s 10-13)                                     4.33%        3.79%      $535,918.23

 (10)   ESCALATION (refer to SHT-10)                                      Escalation                     Total for section (11)                                             $93,861.25
                                                                                                                                                   0.76%        0.66%
 10.1   Escallation f or Project Management and Supervision                                                                                        0.57%        0.50%       $70,900.00
 10.2   Escallation f or Engineering                                                                                                               0.19%        0.16%       $22,961.25
 10.3   Escallation f or Labour (Not req'd - Mid Point calc)
 10.4   Escallation f or Materials (Not req'd)
 (11)   Contingency                                                       R&O                            Total for section (12)                    3.07%        2.69%      $379,643.29

 (12)   Wet Weather Allow ance (Refer to SHT-12)                          Wet Weather                    Total for section (13)                    0.50%        0.44%       $62,413.69

 12.1   CIVIL WET WEA THER ALLOWANCE                                                                                                               0.20%        0.18%       $25,358.59
 12.2   ELECTRICA L WET WEATHER ALLOWANCE                                                                                                          0.08%        0.07%       $10,323.82
 12.3   MECHANICAL WET WEATHER A LLOWANCE                                                                                                          0.15%        0.13%       $18,006.91
 12.4   SUPERV ISION WET WEA THER ALLOWANCE                                                                                                        0.07%        0.06%        $8,724.38
 12.5   OTHER WET WEATHER ALLOWANCE
 (13)   PROVISIONAL SUM S                                                                                Total for section (14)

 (14)   MISC COSTS (LSL, BONDS, INSURANCES ETC)                           TOTAL COST MISC ITEM (14)                                                1.69%        1.49%      $209,427.60
        Liability Charges "U" uncapped Liability (1%), "A" Contract sum Liability (.5%) "B".5 of
 14.1   contract sum liability (.25%)                                                                                                A             0.57%        0.50%       $70,160.00
 14.2
 14.3   Long Service Levy (LSL)                            .35 % on contract value (inc GST)                                          0.50%        0.62%        0.55%       $77,176.00
 14.4   Securities                 Bonds                   Insert Final Total Selling Price                                      $14,032,000       0.22%        0.19%       $27,011.60
 14.5   Warranty Provision                                 .25 % on contract value (inc GST)                                          0.25%        0.28%        0.25%       $35,080.00
        Insurances excluding construction risk / construction w orks "A" .45% of CV, Including construction risk /
 14.6   construction w orks "B" .9% of CV (Worn by Business)
 14.7   Other costs
        TOTAL COST (items 1-14)                                           PROJECT TOTAL COST ITEM S 1 TO 14                                        100%     87.62%      $12,386,340.82

 (15)   OVER-HEADS & M argin (item 15)                         12.00% TOTAL O-H and M argin ITEM (15)                                                       12.35%       $1,745,046.48
 15.1   UGLi Overheads                            54.17%        6.50% of Selling                         Mark up                                   7.39%        6.47%      $914,900.17     $914,900.17
 15.2   UGLi Profit                               45.83%        5.50% of Selling                         Mark up                                   6.25%        5.48%      $774,146.30     $774,146.30
 15.3   Additional Recovery                                                                              FX Rate                                   0.45%        0.40%       $56,000.00      $56,000.00
 15.4                                                                                                    Mark up
 15.5   Partner 3 Profit & O/H                                                                           Mark up
 (16)   TOTAL SELLING (items 1-15)                                        (16) TOTAL SELLING PRICE EXCLUDING GST                                                100%    $14,131,387.30    $1,745,046.48

                                                                          GST Value                                                                                      $1,413,138.73
PRICE APPROVED BY :                                                       DATE :                                   16-Jan-12       RECOVERY TO COST         :                                     14.09%
Tender No :                        TC-3218                                Estimator :GRG / RS                                      RECOVERY TO SELLING :                                          12.35%




                                                               Estimate                                                                                                                                    Risk (mainly $)   Scheduling
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          10
Risk Driver Approach

    EPC Contract
               R&O
                                Estimate
                                           Scheduling


                                R&O



                        T&C
                       Impact



                           Mitigation


                                                        11
Risk Driver Approach

    EPC SCOPE – WBS
               R & O – RBS / WBS
                            Estimate – CBS / WBS
                                         Schedule WBS




   Integration of SCOPE, RISK, COST and TIME


                                                        12
Scope/Cost/Schedule/Risk

  Available data gathering and validation

  WBS Development of full Scope

  Risks & Opportunities Workshop/s (team approach)

  S/C/R Integration

  R&O Register incl. both Uncertainties and Events

  Schedule Cost Risk Model

  Simulation

  Results and Discussions

  Re-Modelling

  Monitoring & Controls




                                                     13
Scope Validation

 The 100% Rule (PMI Standard)



 Validation of the WBS includes 100% of the work defined by the project scope and captures ALL

 deliverables – internal, external, and interim – in terms of work to be completed, including project

 management.




                                                                                                        14
Cost / Schedule Validation

 How to review the deterministic Schedule & Cost?

 Validation of

        Quantities (most likely)

        Productivity Rates (most likely)

        Durations (most likely)

        Resource Cost Rates (most likely)

        Constraints (Contractual or Management)

        Logic network and Work Statements, and

        Reasonable Critical Path




                                                    15
Risk Register Validation

 How to review the Risk Register?

 Validation of

        The identified risks & opportunities

        Likelihood of the identified risks and opportunities

        Impacted WBS element/s

        Schedule and/or Cost Impact/s

        Schedule and/or Cost Variations

        Correlation of risks and opportunities to one another

        Notes, etc.




                                                                16
Special Conditions

 Special conditions that require extra attention:

   Probabilistic Branching – which considers the situation where the outcome of an event can cause two or

   multiple possible courses of activities

   Correlation between risks

        Positive Correlation: occurs when one risk goes higher, so must the other.

        Negative or Adverse Correlation: occurs when one risk increases, the other must decrease.

   Inclement Weather or other external influences




                                                                    O.K.
                                                    Let’s simulate the model, shall we?




                                                                                                            17
Case Study

  Project: EPC Power Station Contract

  $100m Project excluding two Gas Turbines

  Scope:

      2 GT’s and auxiliary equipment;

      Required Balanced of Plant (BOP);

      Power Station sewage system; and

      Roads & drainage.




                                             18
Schedule Review



             Confidential




                            19
Risk Driver Approach

    EPC SCOPE – WBS
               R & O – RBS / WBS
                             Estimate – CBS / WBS
                                           Schedule WBS




                  WBS


                                                      WBS
                       RBS



                                     CBS

                                                            20
R&O Register




For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual R&O Register.   21
S/C/S/R Model*




For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual S/C/S/R Model.   22
MCS Modelling*


Confidential




Confidential



 For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual S/C/S/R Model.   23
Results*



 Confidential




For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual results.   24
Results*


 Confidential




                                                                                             Always CRITICAL
For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual results.                     25
Results*




For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual results.   26
Benefits to bottom line

  Increase certainty in achieving project outcomes

      Proper planning of Scope, Time, Cost, & Risk

      Learn from lessons



  Mitigate risks and maximise Opportunities



  Drive proactively



  Increase efficiency and optimise Scope, Time, Cost, & Risk Management




                                                                          27
Any question, comment?




                         28

More Related Content

What's hot

Achieving the Unachievable: Aligning a Project with Stakeholder Expectations
Achieving the Unachievable: Aligning a Project with Stakeholder ExpectationsAchieving the Unachievable: Aligning a Project with Stakeholder Expectations
Achieving the Unachievable: Aligning a Project with Stakeholder ExpectationsAcumen
 
Reduce Release Cycle Time: Nine Months to a Week - Nice!
Reduce Release Cycle Time: Nine Months to a Week - Nice!Reduce Release Cycle Time: Nine Months to a Week - Nice!
Reduce Release Cycle Time: Nine Months to a Week - Nice!TechWell
 
Kapruch steve
Kapruch steveKapruch steve
Kapruch steveNASAPMC
 
Esker.linda
Esker.lindaEsker.linda
Esker.lindaNASAPMC
 
06 jerome crotteux - 3 e
06   jerome crotteux - 3 e06   jerome crotteux - 3 e
06 jerome crotteux - 3 eLinea Trovata
 
Simon.dekker.vance kotrla
Simon.dekker.vance kotrlaSimon.dekker.vance kotrla
Simon.dekker.vance kotrlaNASAPMC
 
Charles.leising
Charles.leisingCharles.leising
Charles.leisingNASAPMC
 
Successful Dispute Resolution
Successful Dispute ResolutionSuccessful Dispute Resolution
Successful Dispute ResolutionAcumen
 
Armstrong
ArmstrongArmstrong
ArmstrongNASAPMC
 
Richard.grammier
Richard.grammierRichard.grammier
Richard.grammierNASAPMC
 
Ed mangopanelpm challengefinal
Ed mangopanelpm challengefinalEd mangopanelpm challengefinal
Ed mangopanelpm challengefinalNASAPMC
 
Mahmood porter
Mahmood porterMahmood porter
Mahmood porterNASAPMC
 
D brown gbezos_shirshorn
D brown gbezos_shirshornD brown gbezos_shirshorn
D brown gbezos_shirshornNASAPMC
 
Terry.cooke davies
Terry.cooke daviesTerry.cooke davies
Terry.cooke daviesNASAPMC
 
Harvey.tony
Harvey.tonyHarvey.tony
Harvey.tonyNASAPMC
 
Svarcas.rita
Svarcas.ritaSvarcas.rita
Svarcas.ritaNASAPMC
 
Управление проектами: критический путь 2.0
Управление проектами: критический путь 2.0Управление проектами: критический путь 2.0
Управление проектами: критический путь 2.0Vadim Bogdanov PMP, PfMP, MVP, MCT, MCTS
 

What's hot (19)

Achieving the Unachievable: Aligning a Project with Stakeholder Expectations
Achieving the Unachievable: Aligning a Project with Stakeholder ExpectationsAchieving the Unachievable: Aligning a Project with Stakeholder Expectations
Achieving the Unachievable: Aligning a Project with Stakeholder Expectations
 
Reduce Release Cycle Time: Nine Months to a Week - Nice!
Reduce Release Cycle Time: Nine Months to a Week - Nice!Reduce Release Cycle Time: Nine Months to a Week - Nice!
Reduce Release Cycle Time: Nine Months to a Week - Nice!
 
Kapruch steve
Kapruch steveKapruch steve
Kapruch steve
 
Esker.linda
Esker.lindaEsker.linda
Esker.linda
 
06 jerome crotteux - 3 e
06   jerome crotteux - 3 e06   jerome crotteux - 3 e
06 jerome crotteux - 3 e
 
Simon.dekker.vance kotrla
Simon.dekker.vance kotrlaSimon.dekker.vance kotrla
Simon.dekker.vance kotrla
 
Charles.leising
Charles.leisingCharles.leising
Charles.leising
 
Successful Dispute Resolution
Successful Dispute ResolutionSuccessful Dispute Resolution
Successful Dispute Resolution
 
Armstrong
ArmstrongArmstrong
Armstrong
 
Richard.grammier
Richard.grammierRichard.grammier
Richard.grammier
 
Ed mangopanelpm challengefinal
Ed mangopanelpm challengefinalEd mangopanelpm challengefinal
Ed mangopanelpm challengefinal
 
Mahmood porter
Mahmood porterMahmood porter
Mahmood porter
 
D brown gbezos_shirshorn
D brown gbezos_shirshornD brown gbezos_shirshorn
D brown gbezos_shirshorn
 
Terry.cooke davies
Terry.cooke daviesTerry.cooke davies
Terry.cooke davies
 
Harvey.tony
Harvey.tonyHarvey.tony
Harvey.tony
 
Lukas
LukasLukas
Lukas
 
Svarcas.rita
Svarcas.ritaSvarcas.rita
Svarcas.rita
 
Shinn
ShinnShinn
Shinn
 
Управление проектами: критический путь 2.0
Управление проектами: критический путь 2.0Управление проектами: критический путь 2.0
Управление проектами: критический путь 2.0
 

Similar to Contract Risk Assessment by using integrated systems

Insights from social housing projects: building performance evaluation
Insights from social housing projects: building performance evaluationInsights from social housing projects: building performance evaluation
Insights from social housing projects: building performance evaluationInnovate UK
 
Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) projects
Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) projectsEngineering, procurement and construction (EPC) projects
Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) projectsNam N.N Tran M.Eng, PMP
 
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013Pedram Danesh-Mand
 
Rework: Anticipating What May Go Wrong
Rework: Anticipating What May Go WrongRework: Anticipating What May Go Wrong
Rework: Anticipating What May Go Wrongpedlove
 
What would you do if government suddenly became a really demanding client? Od...
What would you do if government suddenly became a really demanding client? Od...What would you do if government suddenly became a really demanding client? Od...
What would you do if government suddenly became a really demanding client? Od...commonsenseLT
 
Collaborative project controls across your entire portfolio
Collaborative project controls across your entire portfolioCollaborative project controls across your entire portfolio
Collaborative project controls across your entire portfolioAconex
 
2010 uci douglas hospital team platinum award by bdc
2010 uci douglas hospital team platinum award by bdc2010 uci douglas hospital team platinum award by bdc
2010 uci douglas hospital team platinum award by bdcAvi Grigorescu
 
REWORK FACTOR AFFECTING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN BHOPAL DIVISION
REWORK FACTOR AFFECTING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN BHOPAL DIVISIONREWORK FACTOR AFFECTING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN BHOPAL DIVISION
REWORK FACTOR AFFECTING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN BHOPAL DIVISIONIRJET Journal
 
Teck Resources 2012 Annual Meeting Presentation
Teck Resources 2012 Annual Meeting PresentationTeck Resources 2012 Annual Meeting Presentation
Teck Resources 2012 Annual Meeting PresentationCompany Spotlight
 
The Status of CCS 2011 Report - Victor Der - Global CCS Institute – Nov 2011 ...
The Status of CCS 2011 Report - Victor Der - Global CCS Institute – Nov 2011 ...The Status of CCS 2011 Report - Victor Der - Global CCS Institute – Nov 2011 ...
The Status of CCS 2011 Report - Victor Der - Global CCS Institute – Nov 2011 ...Global CCS Institute
 
Planning & Scheduling of Commercial Building using Microsoft Project & Applic...
Planning & Scheduling of Commercial Building using Microsoft Project & Applic...Planning & Scheduling of Commercial Building using Microsoft Project & Applic...
Planning & Scheduling of Commercial Building using Microsoft Project & Applic...IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Effects of Project Cost Analysis and Factors Affecting Inflation
IRJET- Effects of Project Cost Analysis and Factors Affecting InflationIRJET- Effects of Project Cost Analysis and Factors Affecting Inflation
IRJET- Effects of Project Cost Analysis and Factors Affecting InflationIRJET Journal
 
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertzInnovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertzRaymond Shen
 
“Investigation of Time-Cost Effectiveness on Construction Projects”
“Investigation of Time-Cost Effectiveness on Construction Projects”“Investigation of Time-Cost Effectiveness on Construction Projects”
“Investigation of Time-Cost Effectiveness on Construction Projects”IOSR Journals
 
Mary.zimmerman
Mary.zimmermanMary.zimmerman
Mary.zimmermanNASAPMC
 
1% AIMS Improving Construction productivity. November 30th 2015.
1% AIMS Improving Construction productivity.  November 30th 2015.1% AIMS Improving Construction productivity.  November 30th 2015.
1% AIMS Improving Construction productivity. November 30th 2015.kiebut
 
Documentação por etapa projeto
Documentação por etapa projetoDocumentação por etapa projeto
Documentação por etapa projetofapimilu
 
IRJET - Fuzzy Logic Approach in Construction Delay Analysis
IRJET - Fuzzy Logic Approach in Construction Delay AnalysisIRJET - Fuzzy Logic Approach in Construction Delay Analysis
IRJET - Fuzzy Logic Approach in Construction Delay AnalysisIRJET Journal
 
IPTC-18322-MS_SHE&S Improvement of a Major Subcontractor on the RG Barzan Ons...
IPTC-18322-MS_SHE&S Improvement of a Major Subcontractor on the RG Barzan Ons...IPTC-18322-MS_SHE&S Improvement of a Major Subcontractor on the RG Barzan Ons...
IPTC-18322-MS_SHE&S Improvement of a Major Subcontractor on the RG Barzan Ons...Bob DeHart
 

Similar to Contract Risk Assessment by using integrated systems (20)

Insights from social housing projects: building performance evaluation
Insights from social housing projects: building performance evaluationInsights from social housing projects: building performance evaluation
Insights from social housing projects: building performance evaluation
 
Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) projects
Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) projectsEngineering, procurement and construction (EPC) projects
Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) projects
 
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
 
Rework: Anticipating What May Go Wrong
Rework: Anticipating What May Go WrongRework: Anticipating What May Go Wrong
Rework: Anticipating What May Go Wrong
 
What would you do if government suddenly became a really demanding client? Od...
What would you do if government suddenly became a really demanding client? Od...What would you do if government suddenly became a really demanding client? Od...
What would you do if government suddenly became a really demanding client? Od...
 
Collaborative project controls across your entire portfolio
Collaborative project controls across your entire portfolioCollaborative project controls across your entire portfolio
Collaborative project controls across your entire portfolio
 
2010 uci douglas hospital team platinum award by bdc
2010 uci douglas hospital team platinum award by bdc2010 uci douglas hospital team platinum award by bdc
2010 uci douglas hospital team platinum award by bdc
 
REWORK FACTOR AFFECTING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN BHOPAL DIVISION
REWORK FACTOR AFFECTING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN BHOPAL DIVISIONREWORK FACTOR AFFECTING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN BHOPAL DIVISION
REWORK FACTOR AFFECTING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN BHOPAL DIVISION
 
Teck Resources 2012 Annual Meeting Presentation
Teck Resources 2012 Annual Meeting PresentationTeck Resources 2012 Annual Meeting Presentation
Teck Resources 2012 Annual Meeting Presentation
 
The Status of CCS 2011 Report - Victor Der - Global CCS Institute – Nov 2011 ...
The Status of CCS 2011 Report - Victor Der - Global CCS Institute – Nov 2011 ...The Status of CCS 2011 Report - Victor Der - Global CCS Institute – Nov 2011 ...
The Status of CCS 2011 Report - Victor Der - Global CCS Institute – Nov 2011 ...
 
Planning & Scheduling of Commercial Building using Microsoft Project & Applic...
Planning & Scheduling of Commercial Building using Microsoft Project & Applic...Planning & Scheduling of Commercial Building using Microsoft Project & Applic...
Planning & Scheduling of Commercial Building using Microsoft Project & Applic...
 
IRJET- Effects of Project Cost Analysis and Factors Affecting Inflation
IRJET- Effects of Project Cost Analysis and Factors Affecting InflationIRJET- Effects of Project Cost Analysis and Factors Affecting Inflation
IRJET- Effects of Project Cost Analysis and Factors Affecting Inflation
 
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertzInnovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
 
“Investigation of Time-Cost Effectiveness on Construction Projects”
“Investigation of Time-Cost Effectiveness on Construction Projects”“Investigation of Time-Cost Effectiveness on Construction Projects”
“Investigation of Time-Cost Effectiveness on Construction Projects”
 
Mary.zimmerman
Mary.zimmermanMary.zimmerman
Mary.zimmerman
 
1% AIMS Improving Construction productivity. November 30th 2015.
1% AIMS Improving Construction productivity.  November 30th 2015.1% AIMS Improving Construction productivity.  November 30th 2015.
1% AIMS Improving Construction productivity. November 30th 2015.
 
Documentação por etapa projeto
Documentação por etapa projetoDocumentação por etapa projeto
Documentação por etapa projeto
 
IRJET - Fuzzy Logic Approach in Construction Delay Analysis
IRJET - Fuzzy Logic Approach in Construction Delay AnalysisIRJET - Fuzzy Logic Approach in Construction Delay Analysis
IRJET - Fuzzy Logic Approach in Construction Delay Analysis
 
Oman EPC 2015 summary and recommendations
Oman EPC 2015 summary and recommendationsOman EPC 2015 summary and recommendations
Oman EPC 2015 summary and recommendations
 
IPTC-18322-MS_SHE&S Improvement of a Major Subcontractor on the RG Barzan Ons...
IPTC-18322-MS_SHE&S Improvement of a Major Subcontractor on the RG Barzan Ons...IPTC-18322-MS_SHE&S Improvement of a Major Subcontractor on the RG Barzan Ons...
IPTC-18322-MS_SHE&S Improvement of a Major Subcontractor on the RG Barzan Ons...
 

More from Pedram Danesh-Mand

Risk Management & Contingency Guideline Training Workshop
Risk Management & Contingency Guideline Training WorkshopRisk Management & Contingency Guideline Training Workshop
Risk Management & Contingency Guideline Training WorkshopPedram Danesh-Mand
 
EA Create Magazine Nov 2016 - Pedram Danesh Mand
EA Create Magazine Nov 2016 - Pedram Danesh MandEA Create Magazine Nov 2016 - Pedram Danesh Mand
EA Create Magazine Nov 2016 - Pedram Danesh MandPedram Danesh-Mand
 
Risk Engineering Society RISK 2016 Conference
Risk Engineering Society RISK 2016 ConferenceRisk Engineering Society RISK 2016 Conference
Risk Engineering Society RISK 2016 ConferencePedram Danesh-Mand
 
RES Risk 2016 Conference brochure - 18-20 May 2016, Sydney
RES Risk 2016 Conference brochure - 18-20 May 2016, SydneyRES Risk 2016 Conference brochure - 18-20 May 2016, Sydney
RES Risk 2016 Conference brochure - 18-20 May 2016, SydneyPedram Danesh-Mand
 
CGBrochure_L6040_L6039_ConstructionCostControl_BrisPer
CGBrochure_L6040_L6039_ConstructionCostControl_BrisPerCGBrochure_L6040_L6039_ConstructionCostControl_BrisPer
CGBrochure_L6040_L6039_ConstructionCostControl_BrisPerPedram Danesh-Mand
 
Safety in Design & Multicultural Teams - National Safety Convention - PDM pre...
Safety in Design & Multicultural Teams - National Safety Convention - PDM pre...Safety in Design & Multicultural Teams - National Safety Convention - PDM pre...
Safety in Design & Multicultural Teams - National Safety Convention - PDM pre...Pedram Danesh-Mand
 
Planning, Risks and Delays - Risks, Rewards and Relationships Workshop 03-Dec...
Planning, Risks and Delays - Risks, Rewards and Relationships Workshop 03-Dec...Planning, Risks and Delays - Risks, Rewards and Relationships Workshop 03-Dec...
Planning, Risks and Delays - Risks, Rewards and Relationships Workshop 03-Dec...Pedram Danesh-Mand
 
Aquenta Risk management Capability Statement (short) 2013
Aquenta Risk management Capability Statement (short) 2013Aquenta Risk management Capability Statement (short) 2013
Aquenta Risk management Capability Statement (short) 2013Pedram Danesh-Mand
 
Monte Calrimulation and Inclement Weather Risk Assessment
Monte Calrimulation and Inclement Weather Risk AssessmentMonte Calrimulation and Inclement Weather Risk Assessment
Monte Calrimulation and Inclement Weather Risk AssessmentPedram Danesh-Mand
 
PD - Contract and Risk Conference - Integrated Schedule Cost Risk Analysis fo...
PD - Contract and Risk Conference - Integrated Schedule Cost Risk Analysis fo...PD - Contract and Risk Conference - Integrated Schedule Cost Risk Analysis fo...
PD - Contract and Risk Conference - Integrated Schedule Cost Risk Analysis fo...Pedram Danesh-Mand
 
Cost Risk Analysis (CRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 19-Jan-2011
Cost Risk Analysis (CRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 19-Jan-2011Cost Risk Analysis (CRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 19-Jan-2011
Cost Risk Analysis (CRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 19-Jan-2011Pedram Danesh-Mand
 
Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 14-Jan-2011
Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 14-Jan-2011Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 14-Jan-2011
Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 14-Jan-2011Pedram Danesh-Mand
 

More from Pedram Danesh-Mand (13)

Risk Management & Contingency Guideline Training Workshop
Risk Management & Contingency Guideline Training WorkshopRisk Management & Contingency Guideline Training Workshop
Risk Management & Contingency Guideline Training Workshop
 
EA Create Magazine Nov 2016 - Pedram Danesh Mand
EA Create Magazine Nov 2016 - Pedram Danesh MandEA Create Magazine Nov 2016 - Pedram Danesh Mand
EA Create Magazine Nov 2016 - Pedram Danesh Mand
 
2016-06 RES Newsletter FINAL
2016-06 RES Newsletter FINAL2016-06 RES Newsletter FINAL
2016-06 RES Newsletter FINAL
 
Risk Engineering Society RISK 2016 Conference
Risk Engineering Society RISK 2016 ConferenceRisk Engineering Society RISK 2016 Conference
Risk Engineering Society RISK 2016 Conference
 
RES Risk 2016 Conference brochure - 18-20 May 2016, Sydney
RES Risk 2016 Conference brochure - 18-20 May 2016, SydneyRES Risk 2016 Conference brochure - 18-20 May 2016, Sydney
RES Risk 2016 Conference brochure - 18-20 May 2016, Sydney
 
CGBrochure_L6040_L6039_ConstructionCostControl_BrisPer
CGBrochure_L6040_L6039_ConstructionCostControl_BrisPerCGBrochure_L6040_L6039_ConstructionCostControl_BrisPer
CGBrochure_L6040_L6039_ConstructionCostControl_BrisPer
 
Safety in Design & Multicultural Teams - National Safety Convention - PDM pre...
Safety in Design & Multicultural Teams - National Safety Convention - PDM pre...Safety in Design & Multicultural Teams - National Safety Convention - PDM pre...
Safety in Design & Multicultural Teams - National Safety Convention - PDM pre...
 
Planning, Risks and Delays - Risks, Rewards and Relationships Workshop 03-Dec...
Planning, Risks and Delays - Risks, Rewards and Relationships Workshop 03-Dec...Planning, Risks and Delays - Risks, Rewards and Relationships Workshop 03-Dec...
Planning, Risks and Delays - Risks, Rewards and Relationships Workshop 03-Dec...
 
Aquenta Risk management Capability Statement (short) 2013
Aquenta Risk management Capability Statement (short) 2013Aquenta Risk management Capability Statement (short) 2013
Aquenta Risk management Capability Statement (short) 2013
 
Monte Calrimulation and Inclement Weather Risk Assessment
Monte Calrimulation and Inclement Weather Risk AssessmentMonte Calrimulation and Inclement Weather Risk Assessment
Monte Calrimulation and Inclement Weather Risk Assessment
 
PD - Contract and Risk Conference - Integrated Schedule Cost Risk Analysis fo...
PD - Contract and Risk Conference - Integrated Schedule Cost Risk Analysis fo...PD - Contract and Risk Conference - Integrated Schedule Cost Risk Analysis fo...
PD - Contract and Risk Conference - Integrated Schedule Cost Risk Analysis fo...
 
Cost Risk Analysis (CRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 19-Jan-2011
Cost Risk Analysis (CRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 19-Jan-2011Cost Risk Analysis (CRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 19-Jan-2011
Cost Risk Analysis (CRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 19-Jan-2011
 
Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 14-Jan-2011
Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 14-Jan-2011Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 14-Jan-2011
Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) by Pedram Daneshmand 14-Jan-2011
 

Contract Risk Assessment by using integrated systems

  • 1. Contract Risk Assessment by using integrated systems Pedram Danesh-Mand, Planning & Risk Manager – Major Projects 3rd Annual Project Scheduling – Feb 2012 QMTRA-01 Rev 3.0
  • 2. Agenda Brief Introduction Planning & Risk Manager – Major Projects, UGL Infrastructure Power Generation, Water & Wastewater, Transport and Telecommunication Industry performance worldwide Current Industry Trends Success Factors in Major Projects “Risk Driver” Method vs Traditional Approach Integrated Risk Assessment System Estimate Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Time Cost Risk 2
  • 3. Project Delivery: Myths We have a good PM system in place, don’t worry. Trust our very experienced team. Everything’s fine. No problem, everything is under control. No worries, we have been there, done that. Please, we don’t need anything new. Another new system, another tool, again! O.K. Let’s have a look in the performance of some major projects worldwide, shall we? 3
  • 4. Performance of Major Projects Engineering Projects Oil and Gas Projects 42% behind schedule 81% behind schedule Ref: Managing the Risk of Delayed Completion in the 21st Century, Survey by Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), 2007 4
  • 5. Performance of Major Projects Power Generation Projects 66% behind schedule Ref: Managing the Risk of Delayed Completion in the 21st Century, Survey by Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), 2007 5
  • 6. Current Industry Trends Increasing demand for efficient and technologically complex solutions in shorter timescales and within tighter financial constraints; High demand for an accurate completion date, as required by many commercial and public benefit projects; A growing trend for employers to require the contractor to take more of the risk that is traditionally taken by the employer; A growth in the use of Design & Build (D&B), Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) and Engineer Procure and Construct Contracts (EPC); and Potentially devastating consequences of the failure to manage time in construction projects. O.K. To identify the success factors, we need to understand why projects fail! Ref: Managing the Risk of Delayed Completion in the 21st Century, Survey by Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), 2007 6
  • 7. Top 5 Causes of Failure REQUIREMENTS: Unclear, lack of agreement, lack of priority, contradictory, ambiguous, imprecise RESOURCES: Lack of resources, resource conflicts, turnover of key resources, poor planning SCHEDULES: Too tight, unrealistic, overly optimistic PLANNING: Based on insufficient data, missing items, insufficient details, poor estimate RISKS & OPPORTUNITIES: Unidentified or assumed, not managed Ref: Strategies for Project Recovery, A PM Solutions Research Report, pmsolutions survey, 2011 7
  • 8. Successful EPC Contractor R&O Quality T&C Scope 8
  • 9. Traditional Approach EPC Contract Estimate Scheduling R&O 9
  • 10. Traditional Approach PROJECT INFORM ATION M onday, 16 January 2012 % of Cost % of Sell VALUE RECOVERY TENDER NO: TC-3218 Total m an Hours Man Hours PROJECT TITLE: Weddell Unit 3 Civil 3,364 CONSULTANT/CLIENT: Pow er & Water Corporation, NT Mech 11,854 POST TENDER NEGOTIATION DATE: 16-Jan-12 Elect 6,164 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME DURATION (Weeks) 34 8 Months M anning Average Peak CONSTRUCTION SITE DURATION (Weeks) 34 8 Months Civil 10 16 DEFECTS LIABILITY PERIOD (Weeks) 104 24 Months Mech 28 45 REVISION AND ISSUE REVA0-1 Elect 17 28 Value Recovery (1-4) TOTAL DIRECT JOB COSTS (items 1-4) TOTAL COST DJC (items 1-5) 51.17% 44.85% $6,338,802.81 (1) PROJECT ELEMENTS, DIRECT COSTS Total for section (1) 40.79% 35.75% $5,053,352.81 1.1 Civil Works Input f rom File 07-Jun-11 9.13% 8.00% $1,131,041.30 1.2 Mechanical Input f rom File 30-May-11 18.16% 15.92% $2,249,906.72 1.3 Electrical Input f rom File 01-Jun-11 12.79% 11.21% $1,584,404.79 1.4 Recruitment 1.4 Final Negotiation f igure generally f or w et w eather increase 0.71% 0.62% $88,000.00 1.5 File (2) ENGINEERING (Refer SHT-2) Total for section (2) 8.12% 7.12% $1,005,350.00 2.1 UGL Engineering Engineering 09-May-11 7.62% 6.68% $943,522.00 2.2 Geotechnical Report & O&M Manuals 09-May-11 0.50% 0.44% $61,828.00 (3) General Specification Requirements (Refer SHT-3) Total for section (3) 0.81% 0.71% $100,100.00 3.1 Preliminary Costs UGLi Prelims File 0.81% 0.71% $100,100.00 3.2 Preliminary Costs other File (4) COMM ISSIONING (Refer SHT-4) Total for section (4) 1.45% 1.27% $180,000.00 4.1 Commissioning costs UGLi Admin Included in Admin below 4.2 Commissioning Materials Comissioning File 1.45% 1.27% $180,000.00 4.3 Commissioning costs other File (5-9) TOTAL INDIRECT JOB COSTS (item s 5-9) TOTAL COST INDIRECTS (item s 5-9) 42.79% 37.49% $5,302,192.18 (5) ADMINISTRATION (Refer SHT-5) Total for section (6) 28.90% 25.33% $3,580,535.30 5.1 Site Admin and Site Supervision Costs Admin 10.92% 9.57% $1,352,868.94 5.2 Site Engineering and Site Support Staf f Admin 7.44% 6.52% $921,581.16 5.3 Site Commissioning labour Costs Admin 7.71% 6.76% $955,220.13 5.4 Head Off ice Support Admin 2.44% 2.14% $302,654.86 5.5 Other admin costs Recruitment Costs 0.39% 0.34% $48,210.20 (6) MOBILISATION Plant & Buildings (Refer SHT-6) Total for section (7) 12.75% 11.16% $1,579,350.00 6.1 ( 7a) MOBILISATION & DEMOBILSA TION Mob & Demob 8.04% 7.05% $996,060.00 6.2 (7bi) SITE BUILDINGS 0.69% 0.60% $85,010.00 6.3 (7bii) SITE CONNECTIONS 1.00% 0.87% $123,550.00 6.4 (7biii) PLANT AND TOOLS 2.09% 1.83% $258,880.00 6.5 (7biv) VEHICLES 0.23% 0.20% $28,900.00 6.6 (7bv) SITE RUNNING COSTS 0.44% 0.38% $54,150.00 6.6 Other - Principal's Site Of fice + Utility Pow er & Water Connections (PWC Mtg Darw in Addition) 0.26% 0.23% $32,800.00 (7) COMM UNITY & ENVIRONMENT (Refer SHT-7) Comm & Env Total for section (8) 0.09% 0.08% $11,700.00 (8) HEALTH & SAFETY EQUIPM ENT (Refer SHT-8) Health & Saf ety Total for section (9) 1.05% 0.92% $130,606.88 Hedging Not (9) HEDGING (refer to SHT-9) BG & Hedge Total for section (10) Consi dered (10-13) TOTAL ALLOWANCES (item s 10-13) TOTAL COST ALLOWANCES (item s 10-13) 4.33% 3.79% $535,918.23 (10) ESCALATION (refer to SHT-10) Escalation Total for section (11) $93,861.25 0.76% 0.66% 10.1 Escallation f or Project Management and Supervision 0.57% 0.50% $70,900.00 10.2 Escallation f or Engineering 0.19% 0.16% $22,961.25 10.3 Escallation f or Labour (Not req'd - Mid Point calc) 10.4 Escallation f or Materials (Not req'd) (11) Contingency R&O Total for section (12) 3.07% 2.69% $379,643.29 (12) Wet Weather Allow ance (Refer to SHT-12) Wet Weather Total for section (13) 0.50% 0.44% $62,413.69 12.1 CIVIL WET WEA THER ALLOWANCE 0.20% 0.18% $25,358.59 12.2 ELECTRICA L WET WEATHER ALLOWANCE 0.08% 0.07% $10,323.82 12.3 MECHANICAL WET WEATHER A LLOWANCE 0.15% 0.13% $18,006.91 12.4 SUPERV ISION WET WEA THER ALLOWANCE 0.07% 0.06% $8,724.38 12.5 OTHER WET WEATHER ALLOWANCE (13) PROVISIONAL SUM S Total for section (14) (14) MISC COSTS (LSL, BONDS, INSURANCES ETC) TOTAL COST MISC ITEM (14) 1.69% 1.49% $209,427.60 Liability Charges "U" uncapped Liability (1%), "A" Contract sum Liability (.5%) "B".5 of 14.1 contract sum liability (.25%) A 0.57% 0.50% $70,160.00 14.2 14.3 Long Service Levy (LSL) .35 % on contract value (inc GST) 0.50% 0.62% 0.55% $77,176.00 14.4 Securities Bonds Insert Final Total Selling Price $14,032,000 0.22% 0.19% $27,011.60 14.5 Warranty Provision .25 % on contract value (inc GST) 0.25% 0.28% 0.25% $35,080.00 Insurances excluding construction risk / construction w orks "A" .45% of CV, Including construction risk / 14.6 construction w orks "B" .9% of CV (Worn by Business) 14.7 Other costs TOTAL COST (items 1-14) PROJECT TOTAL COST ITEM S 1 TO 14 100% 87.62% $12,386,340.82 (15) OVER-HEADS & M argin (item 15) 12.00% TOTAL O-H and M argin ITEM (15) 12.35% $1,745,046.48 15.1 UGLi Overheads 54.17% 6.50% of Selling Mark up 7.39% 6.47% $914,900.17 $914,900.17 15.2 UGLi Profit 45.83% 5.50% of Selling Mark up 6.25% 5.48% $774,146.30 $774,146.30 15.3 Additional Recovery FX Rate 0.45% 0.40% $56,000.00 $56,000.00 15.4 Mark up 15.5 Partner 3 Profit & O/H Mark up (16) TOTAL SELLING (items 1-15) (16) TOTAL SELLING PRICE EXCLUDING GST 100% $14,131,387.30 $1,745,046.48 GST Value $1,413,138.73 PRICE APPROVED BY : DATE : 16-Jan-12 RECOVERY TO COST : 14.09% Tender No : TC-3218 Estimator :GRG / RS RECOVERY TO SELLING : 12.35% Estimate Risk (mainly $) Scheduling 10
  • 11. Risk Driver Approach EPC Contract R&O Estimate Scheduling R&O T&C Impact Mitigation 11
  • 12. Risk Driver Approach EPC SCOPE – WBS R & O – RBS / WBS Estimate – CBS / WBS Schedule WBS Integration of SCOPE, RISK, COST and TIME 12
  • 13. Scope/Cost/Schedule/Risk Available data gathering and validation WBS Development of full Scope Risks & Opportunities Workshop/s (team approach) S/C/R Integration R&O Register incl. both Uncertainties and Events Schedule Cost Risk Model Simulation Results and Discussions Re-Modelling Monitoring & Controls 13
  • 14. Scope Validation The 100% Rule (PMI Standard) Validation of the WBS includes 100% of the work defined by the project scope and captures ALL deliverables – internal, external, and interim – in terms of work to be completed, including project management. 14
  • 15. Cost / Schedule Validation How to review the deterministic Schedule & Cost? Validation of Quantities (most likely) Productivity Rates (most likely) Durations (most likely) Resource Cost Rates (most likely) Constraints (Contractual or Management) Logic network and Work Statements, and Reasonable Critical Path 15
  • 16. Risk Register Validation How to review the Risk Register? Validation of The identified risks & opportunities Likelihood of the identified risks and opportunities Impacted WBS element/s Schedule and/or Cost Impact/s Schedule and/or Cost Variations Correlation of risks and opportunities to one another Notes, etc. 16
  • 17. Special Conditions Special conditions that require extra attention: Probabilistic Branching – which considers the situation where the outcome of an event can cause two or multiple possible courses of activities Correlation between risks Positive Correlation: occurs when one risk goes higher, so must the other. Negative or Adverse Correlation: occurs when one risk increases, the other must decrease. Inclement Weather or other external influences O.K. Let’s simulate the model, shall we? 17
  • 18. Case Study Project: EPC Power Station Contract $100m Project excluding two Gas Turbines Scope: 2 GT’s and auxiliary equipment; Required Balanced of Plant (BOP); Power Station sewage system; and Roads & drainage. 18
  • 19. Schedule Review Confidential 19
  • 20. Risk Driver Approach EPC SCOPE – WBS R & O – RBS / WBS Estimate – CBS / WBS Schedule WBS WBS WBS RBS CBS 20
  • 21. R&O Register For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual R&O Register. 21
  • 22. S/C/S/R Model* For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual S/C/S/R Model. 22
  • 23. MCS Modelling* Confidential Confidential For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual S/C/S/R Model. 23
  • 24. Results* Confidential For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual results. 24
  • 25. Results* Confidential Always CRITICAL For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual results. 25
  • 26. Results* For the confidentiality reasons, this image does not present the project’s actual results. 26
  • 27. Benefits to bottom line Increase certainty in achieving project outcomes Proper planning of Scope, Time, Cost, & Risk Learn from lessons Mitigate risks and maximise Opportunities Drive proactively Increase efficiency and optimise Scope, Time, Cost, & Risk Management 27