The document discusses articles published before and after crisis communication activities regarding the development of Doma Square in Riga, Latvia. Initially, articles featured negative messages about removing the beer garden and the square disappearing. After communication activities, articles became less negative and included messages that lawyers were advising not to fight developers, and investors were hostages in the situation. By 2006, activities had drawn attention to the historical aspects of Doma Square.

1. Articles in the beginning of crises
Particularly negative messages,
such as –Taking away
Beer Garden from the City;
Will the Doma square disappear?
Some conman wants to earn
big money etc.
Articles after crisis communication activities
Politicians are not so negative any
more in there announcements.
Articles with messages, such as –
Riga City Council lawyers are giving
advice not fight with DI; Investors
are hostages in this situations,
hard to blame them etc.

2. Year 2006
After proactive communication activities
has drawn stakeholders attention to the
historical side of the square by
Doma place.
Stakeholder map
One of the materials
collected in historicsal
research