Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative Research.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•5 views

Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative Research Article related to the problem identified in Burn out Once your article is approved, conduct an initial critical appraisal by responding to the following questions: What type of qualitative research design was utilized to conduct the study? Are the results valid/trustworthy and credible? · How were the participants chosen? · How were accuracy and completeness of data assured? · How plausible/believable are the results? Are implications of the research stated? · May new insights increase sensitivity to others’ needs? · May understandings enhance situational competence? What is the effect on the reader? · Are the results plausible and believable? · Is the reader imaginatively drawn to the experience? What are the results of the study? · Does the research approach fit the purpose of the study? How does the researcher identify the study approach? · Are the data collection and analysis techniques appropriate? Is the significance/importance of the study explicit? · Does the literature support a need for the study? · What is the study’s potential contribution? Is the sampling clear and guided by study needs? · Does the researcher control selection of the sample? · Do sample size and composition reflect the study needs? · Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified? Are data collection procedures clear? · Are sources and means of verifying data explicit? · Are researcher roles and activities explained? Are data analysis procedures described? · Does analysis guide directions of sampling when it ends? · Are data management processes described? · What are the reported results (descriptive or interpretation)? How are specific findings presented? · Are the data meanings derived from data described in context? · Does the writing effectively promote understanding? Will the results help me care for my patients? · Are the results relevant to persons in similar situations? · Are the results relevant to patient values and/or circumstances? · How may the results be applied to clinical practice? Please be sure to answer the questions thoroughly using complete sentences and APA format. Explain responses to yes/no questions in detail by presenting information found in the study to support your response. Provide a reference for the article according to APA format. Expectations Clearly and fully answer all questions Include a title page and reference page in APA format 7th edition. Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of one scholarly source for the article is required .

Education

· Is the reader imaginatively drawn to the experience?
What are the results of the study?
· Does the research approach fit the purpose of the study?
How does the researcher identify the study approach?
· Are the data collection and analysis techniques appropriate?
Is the significance/importance of the study explicit?
· Does the literature support a need for the study?
· What is the study’s potential contribution?
Is the sampling clear and guided by study needs?
· Does the researcher control selection of the sample?
· Do sample size and composition reflect the study needs?
· Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified?
Are data collection procedures clear?

· Are sources and means of verifying data explicit?
· Are researcher roles and activities explained?
Are data analysis procedures described?
· Does analysis guide directions of sampling when it ends?
· Are data management processes described?
· What are the reported results (descriptive or interpretation)?
How are specific findings presented?
· Are the data meanings derived from data described in
context?
· Does the writing effectively promote understanding?
Will the results help me care for my patients?
· Are the results relevant to persons in similar situations?
· Are the results relevant to patient values and/or
circumstances?
· How may the results be applied to clinical practice?
Please be sure to answer the questions thoroughly using
complete sentences and APA format. Explain responses to

yes/no questions in detail by presenting information found in
the study to support your response.
Provide a reference for the article according to APA format.
Expectations
Clearly and fully answer all questions
Include a title page and reference page in APA format 7th
edition.
Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for
all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of
one scholarly source for the article is required

Assignment: Qualitative Research Write a fully developed and detailed APA essay addressing each of the following points/questions. There is no required word count; be sure to completely answer all the questions for each question in detail. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least one (1) source using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page are required. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment. Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative research study on the topic identified in Module 1. Conduct an initial critical appraisal of the study. Respond to the overview questions for the critical appraisal of qualitative studies, including: What type of qualitative research design was utilized to conduct the study? Are the results valid/trustworthy and credible? How were the participants chosen? How were accuracy and completeness of data assured? How plausible/believable are the results? Are implications of the research stated? May new insights increase sensitivity to others’ needs? May understandings enhance situational competence? What is the effect on the reader? Are the results plausible and believable? Is the reader imaginatively drawn to the experience? What are the results of the study? Does the research approach fit the purpose of the study? How does the researcher identify the study approach? Are the data collection and analysis techniques appropriate? Is the significance/importance of the study explicit? Does the literature support a need for the study? What is the study’s potential contribution? Is the sampling clear and guided by study needs? Does the researcher control selection of the sample? Do sample size and composition reflect the study needs? Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified? Are data collection procedures clear? Are sources and means of verifying data explicit? Are researcher roles and activities explained? Are data analysis procedures described? Does analysis guide directions of sampling when it ends? Are data management processes described? What are the reported results (descriptive or interpretation)? How are specific findings presented? Are the data meanings derived from data described in context? Does the writing effectively promote understanding? Will the results help me care for my patients? Are the results relevant to persons in similar situations? Are the results relevant to patient values and/or circumstances? How may the results be applied to clinical practice? Please be sure to answer the questions thoroughly using complete sentences and .

Research Critique.pptx

neeti70

Appropriate Significance Test Applied.docx

4934bk

Research critique

Muthu Venkatachalam

ARTICLE CRITIQUEINTRODUCTIONProblemIs there a st.docx

festockton

ARTICLE CRITIQUE INTRODUCTION Problem Is there a statement of the problem or a qualitative Yes No N/A topic of study? Does the problem of topic indicate a particular focus of study? Is the problem “researchable,” that is, can it be investigated through the collection and analysis of data? Is the background information on the problem presented? Is the educational significance of the problem discussed? Does the quantitative problem statement indicate the variables of interest and the specific relationship between those variables that were investigated? Does the qualitative problem statement provide a general indication of the research topic or issue? When necessary, are variables directly or operationally defined? Does the researcher have the knowledge and skill to carry out the proposed research? Review of the Related Literature Is the review comprehensive? Are all references cited relevant to the problem under investigation? Are most of the sources primary; i.e., are there only a few or no secondary sources? Have the references been analyzed and critiqued, and the results of various studies compared and contrasted? That is, is the review more than a series of abstracts or annotations? Is the relevancy of each reference explained? Is the review well organized? Does it logically flow in such a way that the references least related to the problem are discussed first and the most related references are discussed last? 2 Does it educate the reader about the problem or topic? Does the review conclude with a summary and interpretation of the literature and its implications for the problem investigated? Do the implications discussed form an empirical or theoretical rationale for the hypotheses that follow? Are references cited completely and accurately? Hypothesis Are specific questions to be answered listed or specific hypotheses to be tested stated? Does each hypothesis state an expected relationship or difference? If necessary, are variables directly or operationally defined? Is each hypothesis testable? METHODS Participants Are the size and major characteristics of the population studied described? Are the accessible and target populations described? If a sample was selected, is the method of selecting the sample clearly described? Does the method of sample selection suggest any limitations or biases in the sample? For example, is stratified sampling used to obtain sample subgroups? Are the size and major characteristics of the sample described? Does the sample size meet the suggested guideline for minimum sample size appropriate for quantitative analyses? Instruments Do instruments and their administration meet guidelines for protecting human subjects? Have needed permissions been obtained? Is the rationale given for the selection of the instruments (or measurements) used? Is each instrument described in terms of purpose, ...

Critical analysis of research reportPreeti Sood

Research Critique.pptx

Asokan R

Critical Review of published Research.pptx

ReshmaSR9

MSN5300: Advanced Nursing Inquiry, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice Team:____________ Critical Appraisal Worksheet for Group Project 2, Part b Elements of Appraisal Discussion Study Design Was the study a qualitative or quantitative design? Explain. Practice Problem State the practice problem/issue that is the focus of the study. How does this practice problem/issue affect your nursing practice? Study Purpose State the purpose of the study. Discuss whether this study was feasible to conduct in terms of money commitment; the researchers' expertise; availability of subjects, and ethical considerations. Review of Literature Was the literature review organized to show the progressive development of evidence from previous research? Was a clear, concise summary presented of the current empirical and theoretical knowledge in the area of the study? Did the literature review summary identify what was known and not known about the research problem? Did it logically direct the research purpose? Theoretical Framework Is a conceptual model or theoretical framework used? If so, is it presented with clarity? Does it adequately explain the phenomenon of concern? Is the framework linked to the research purpose? If not, would another framework fit more logically with the study? If a proposition or relationship from a theory is to be tested, is the proposition clearly identified and linked to the study hypothesis? Research Question(s) and Hpothesis(es) What is the research question? Is it clearly stated? Does the research question match the purpose of the study? What is the research hypothesis? Is it clearly stated? Does the hypothesis match the purpose of the study? Formulate a null hypothesis for this study. Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships (propositions) in the framework? Explain. Variables List all research variables with corresponding levels of measurement on the NOIR scale. Do variables represent the concepts identified in the framework? How is each study variable defined (both conceptually and operationally)? Are conceptual definitions of variables consistent with operational definitions? Study Design What was the design was used in the study? Was it the most appropriate design to answer the study question? Explain. Was the design logically linked to the sampling method and statistical analyses? Did the design provide a means to examine all objectives, questions, or hypotheses? If there was an intervention (treatment) in the study: · what was the intervention? was it clearly described? · was the treatment appropriate for examining the study purpose and hypotheses? · did the study framework explain the links between the treatment (independent variab.

Research Critique

Dr. Senthilvel Vasudevan

quantitative nor qualitative research.docx

write22

quantitative nor qualitative research.docx

stirlingvwriters

University of Guelph, Learning Commons Library (httpwww.lib.uog.docx

dickonsondorris

University of Guelph, Learning Commons Library (http://www.lib.uoguelph.ca/get-assistance/writing/specific-types-papers/using-scientific-journal-article-write-critical-review) Using a Scientific Journal Article to Write a Critical Review Writing a critical review of a journal article can help to improve your research skills. By assessing the work of others, you develop skills as a critical reader and become familiar with the types of evaluation criteria that will be applied to research in your field and thus your own research. You are expected to read the article carefully, analyse it, and evaluate the quality and originality of the research, as well as its relevance and presentation. Its strengths and weaknesses are assessed, followed by its overall value. Do not be confused by the term critique: it does not mean that you only look at the negative aspects of what the researcher has done. You should address both the positive and negative aspects. If your lecturer has given you specific advice on how to write a critical review, follow that advice. If not, the following steps may help you. These steps are based on a detailed description of how to analyse and evaluate a research article provided by Wood (2003) in her lab guide. This guide is divided into two parts. The first part, "Researching the Critique," outlines the steps involved in selecting and evaluating a research article. The second part, "Writing your Critique," discusses two possible ways to structure your critique paper. A. Researching the Critique The questions listed under many of the subheadings in this section may provide you with a good place to begin understanding what you are looking for and what form your critique might take. 1. Select a Topic If your lecturer does not assign a topic or a particular article for you to review, and you must choose a topic yourself, try using a review article from your field. Review articles summarize and evaluate current studies (research articles) on a particular topic. Select a review article on a topic that interests you and that is written clearly so you can understand it. 2. Select a Research Article Use the review article to select a research article. This can be very useful in writing your critique. The review article will provide background information for your analysis, as well as establishing that the research paper you are critiquing is significant: if the paper was not so highly regarded, it would not have been selected to be reviewed. When choosing a research article, examine the Materials & Methods section closely and make sure you have a good grasp of the techniques and methods used. If you don't, you may have difficulty evaluating them. 3. Analyse the Text Read the article(s) carefully. As you read the article(s) use the following questions to help you understand how and why the research was carried out. · What is the author's central purpose? Look at INTRODUCTION. · What methods were used to accomplish this purpose (systematic recor ...

List of articles that were used in past papers that cannot be used

RIYAN43

Critique

KavithaDevaraj

Critical analysis of research article

Dr.Nilima Sonawane

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH.pptx

Dr.Nilima Sonawane

Research Critique Framework Qualitative Research1Title of Pape.docx

ronak56

Research Critique Framework: Qualitative Research 1 Title of Paper Article Reference in APA format Permalink to the article ***Copy and paste this grid into a new Word document. Please include the article reference and the permalink above the grid (shown above). Please submit assignment with a title page and a reference page*** Below is Box 5.2 of the textbook (pp. 106-109), Chapter 5. Use the frame to critique qualitative research articles. Aspect of the Report Critiquing Questions Answer Yes/No Comment(s) Title · Is the title a good one, succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population? Abstract · Did the abstract clearly and concisely summarize the main features of the report (problem, methods, results, conclusion)? Introduction Statement of the Problem · Was the problem stated unambiguously, and was it easy to identify? · Is the problem significant for nursing? · Did the problem statement build a persuasive argument for the new study? · Was there a good match between the research problem and the methods used – that is, was a quantitative approach appropriate? Research Questions · Were research questions explicitly stated? If not, was their absence justified? · Were the questions consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, or ideological orientation? Literature Review · Did the report adequately summarize the existing body of knowledge related to the problem or phenomenon of interest? · Did the literature review provide a strong basis for the new study? Conceptual Underpinnings · Were key concepts defined conceptually? · Was the philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideologic orientation made explicit and was it appropriate for the problem? Method Protection of Human Rights · Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants? · Was the study subject to external review by an IRB/ethics review board? · Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants? Research Design and Research Tradition · Was the identified research tradition (if any) congruent with the methods used to collect and analyze data? · Was an adequate amount of time spent with study participants? · Did the design unfold during data collection, giving researchers opportunities to capitalize on early understandings? · Was there an adequate number of contacts with study participants? Sample and Setting · Was the group or population of interest adequately described? Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail? · Was the approach used to recruit participants or gain access to the site productive and appropriate? · Was the best possible method of sampling used to enhance information richness and address the needs of the study? · Was the sample size adequate? Was saturation achieved? Data Collection · Were the methods of gathering data appropriate? Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation? · ...

Critical appraisal of the recherche article

Syed Abudaheer

Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Assignment Guideline.docx

studywriters

Presentation critique

maahalawan

Evaluating information

Penelope Cole

Examiners Expectations from PhD Thesis

Centre for Social Initiative and Management

1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docx

felicidaddinwoodie

1 Week 5:Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography As mentioned, one component of becoming an independent scholar is learning how to provide an evaluative critique of the work of other scholars. A critique of scholarly work requires your ability to use high level critical thinking skills. In addition, you must be able to write constructively and communicate your ideas well with clear and focused writing. The purpose of this assignment is two-fold. First, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly and precisely summarize and critically evaluate specific information from peer-reviewed resources. Secondly, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly present that evaluative information in writing that meets academic and professional expectations. These skills will be invaluable as you go on to develop your literature review and in your journey to become an independent scholar. The result of this activity is produce annotated bibliographies based on the two peer-reviewed journal articles related to your chosen topic (you are welcome to include more articles for practice and feedback). Use the sections and questions below to help you critique each article. You do not need to answer every single question as some questions might not apply. The questions are listed as a means to help you generate ideas as you work on critiquing each article. You might also consider using this template in the future when critically analyzing articles. Please REMOVE the instructions and questions listed below for your paper and submit an annotated bibliography for each article. Link to peer reviewed article one: http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/341 1) APA reference for article #1 2)Introductionand core study elements · Give an overview of the purpose of the study and the problem or issue discussed. · Consider whether the problem is clearly described. Did the author(s) document and support the existence of the problem with scholarly sources and data? Were the sources credible and relevant (as defined by the readings you’ve done for this course)? · What were the research questions? · What were the key findings and conclusions of the study? 3) Evaluate literature reviewed · Examine the literature reviewed by the author(s). How relevant is the) cited literature? Do certain ideas or concepts appear to be over/underemphasized? Was there any bias in language or tone of the writing? What discussions need elaboration or could be more concise? What is missing? 4) Evaluate theoretical framework · What theoretical or conceptual framework was used as the basis for the study? What are the key variables and from which theories do they originate? Are variables well-defined? What alternative theories might support this study? 5) Evaluate methods · What research method and designs are used in this study? · How well are the methods described (could a reader duplicate the research process if needed)? · Do the m ...

Research Critique GuidelinesTo write a critical appr.docx

ronak56

Research Critique Guidelines To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your responses. Qualitative Study Background of Study: · Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem. · How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. · Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. · List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. · Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Method of Study: · Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions? · Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it? · Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include? · Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study. · Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies? · Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument? · When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings? Results of Study · What were the study findings? · What are the implications to nursing? · Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing? Ethical Considerations · Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board? · Was patient privacy protected? · Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of? Conclusion · Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement. · Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice. · Incorporate a critical apprai ...

SI2016JoslinPannHowToReadResearch.pdf

ShairaAgulan1

Concept of collection. Assume that An agency has focused its sys.docx

Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative Research.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative Research.docx

Similar to Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative Research.docx (20)

More from patricke8

More from patricke8 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative Research.docx