Complexity and contradiction in architecture by Robert venturi Siva Raman
This presentation is about the critical review of the book Complexity and contradiction in architecture by Robert venturi focusing on the issues related to critical regionalism
It is a development in POST-MODERNISM that started in late 1980s.
It views architecture in bits and pieces.
It has no visual logic.
Buildings may appear to be made of abstract forms.
The idea was to develop buildings which show how differently from traditional architectural conventions buildings can be built without loosing their utility and still complying with the fundamental laws of physics.
The ideas were borrowed from the French philosopher, Jacques Derrida.
Architects involved –
Zaha Hadid
Bernhard Tschumi
Rem Koolhaas
The term ‘Critical Regionalism’ was first coined by Alexander Tzonis and Liane Lefaivre and later more famously and pretentiously by Kenneth Frampton in “Towards a Critical Regionalism : Six points of an architecture of resistance”
According to Frampton, critical regionalism should adopt modern architecture critically for its universal progressive qualities but at the same time should value responses particular to the context. Emphasis should be on topography, climate, light, tectonic form rather than scenography and the tactile sense rather than the visual.
According to Tzonis and Lefaivre, critical regionalism need not directly draw from the context, rather elements can be stripped of their context and used in strange rather than familiar ways.
Critical regionalism is different from Regionalism which tries to achieve a one-to-one correspondence with vernacular architecture in a conscious way without consciously partaking in the universal.
It is considered a particular form of post-modern response in developing countries, not to be confused with postmodernism as architectural style.
Complexity and contradiction in architecture by Robert venturi Siva Raman
This presentation is about the critical review of the book Complexity and contradiction in architecture by Robert venturi focusing on the issues related to critical regionalism
It is a development in POST-MODERNISM that started in late 1980s.
It views architecture in bits and pieces.
It has no visual logic.
Buildings may appear to be made of abstract forms.
The idea was to develop buildings which show how differently from traditional architectural conventions buildings can be built without loosing their utility and still complying with the fundamental laws of physics.
The ideas were borrowed from the French philosopher, Jacques Derrida.
Architects involved –
Zaha Hadid
Bernhard Tschumi
Rem Koolhaas
The term ‘Critical Regionalism’ was first coined by Alexander Tzonis and Liane Lefaivre and later more famously and pretentiously by Kenneth Frampton in “Towards a Critical Regionalism : Six points of an architecture of resistance”
According to Frampton, critical regionalism should adopt modern architecture critically for its universal progressive qualities but at the same time should value responses particular to the context. Emphasis should be on topography, climate, light, tectonic form rather than scenography and the tactile sense rather than the visual.
According to Tzonis and Lefaivre, critical regionalism need not directly draw from the context, rather elements can be stripped of their context and used in strange rather than familiar ways.
Critical regionalism is different from Regionalism which tries to achieve a one-to-one correspondence with vernacular architecture in a conscious way without consciously partaking in the universal.
It is considered a particular form of post-modern response in developing countries, not to be confused with postmodernism as architectural style.
Christopher Wolfgang Alexander is a widely influential architect and design theorist. His theories about the nature of human-centered design have affected fields beyond architecture, including urban design, software, sociology and others.
Post-Modern Architecture and the architects involoved in it.Rohit Arora
Contains the comparison between modern architecture and post-modern architecture. The reasons that led to post-modern architecture. The architects who made important buildings with post-modern architecture.
Christopher Wolfgang Alexander is a widely influential architect and design theorist. His theories about the nature of human-centered design have affected fields beyond architecture, including urban design, software, sociology and others.
Post-Modern Architecture and the architects involoved in it.Rohit Arora
Contains the comparison between modern architecture and post-modern architecture. The reasons that led to post-modern architecture. The architects who made important buildings with post-modern architecture.
Structuralism is a mode of thinking .pptxseyefeselasse
Structuralism is a mode of thinking and a method of analysis practiced in 20th-centurysocial sciences and humanities. Methodologically, it analyses large-scale systems by examining the relations and functions of the smallest constituent elements of such systems, which range from human languages and cultural practices to folktales and literary texts.
This article presents a special case of urban revitalization, a project in Amman- Jordan. It is located in the valley region of the city, and it is the culmination of the design efforts of a number of prominent Jordanian Architects.
Ras El-Ein Development is special for the importance of its location as part of the memory of the city, and is also special in the general design attitudes and decisions taken by the designers and the responsible authorities.
!nter: For Intergenerational Living. A Social Practice Change StrategyYousef Taibeh
‘!nter’ is a practice change strategy, focused on increasing the efficiency of space consumption through increasing the residential density in selected suburbs and regional areas. This is envisaged through encouraging inter-generational living in existing houses, using the international students as leverage and targeting what is labelled as empty nesters (i.e. parents whose children have grown up and left home). Most of these families continue to live in the same houses with areas bigger than their actual needs and inefficiently utilised spaces.
This report presented a practice change strategy focused on a household related unsustainable practice. This practice is summarised in the increasing inefficiency in living space utilisation in Melbourne for a certain household sector, where large percentage of empty nesters choose to continue living in the same houses with the same space arrangement, though the structure of their families has changed. Reasons restraining many empty nesters from downsizing to smaller houses are varied, and they are driven by different social, physical and economical factors as highlighted in the report. To present the strategy, the report was divided into two main parts:
Section 1: Rationale and analysis of the practice
Section 2 Rationale for and the design of the strategy
It concluded with highlighting the limitations of the strategy and the areas that need special concern.
The following paper tries to explain the various reasons that made sustainability so contested by discussing the circumstances surrounding the emergence of the term and its evolution. It also tries to shed some light on the future of sustainability through employing a study technique borrowed from a well established field of human knowledge.
An entry to the 14th International Planning History Society Conference 2010, “Urban Transformation: Controversies, Contrasts and Challenges”, Istanbul/Turkey.
This study introduces an eminent acting architect in the Arab World, working with a deep understanding of his rich heritage and culture, and full awareness of his moral duty in producing architecture that respects and reflects this special culture besides satisfying functional needs of the end-users.
Information on the Living wall Project- Amman, based on the article: Taibeh, Y. (2009) "A wall with a spirit – the living wall project Amman”, MEADA, 2009/1, p. 44-51
Information on the Living wall Project - Amman, based on the article: Taibeh, Y. (2009) "A wall with a spirit – the living wall project Amman”, MEADA, 2009/1, p. 55-63
An entry for the 14th International Planning History Society Conference, Istanbul, Turkey "Urban Transformation: Controversies, Contrasts and Challenges" 12-15 July 2010
2. INTRODUCTION: - Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture by Robert Venturi 1966 (most of the book was written in 1962) - Published by the Museum of Modern Art (the classical advocate of Modern architecture) - Venturi as a : - Practitioner Architect (graduated from Princeton Uni. In 1947) - Artist (M.F.A from Princeton Uni. In 1950) - Scholar, Author & teacher (Pennsylvania, Yale, Princeton, Harvard, UCLA, Rice and the American Academy in Rome in which previously was a Prize fellow between 1954-56
3. THE CONTEXT: The 60s, age of pluralism & revision (a key transitional period) Political conditions: New International Order post WW II, a shift from Europe to America.. Cold war -war of ideologies, warmed up in the 60s (Cuba crisis & outer-space race), as The Economic boom slows dawn. Liberation & individualism civil rights, King & X, Feminists & the pill, the Hippies & the Greens. Conditions in cities: - Post WWII , vast construction project & rebuilding for the destroyed European cities - Modern architecture actualizing the mass production and the social theories. - America getting out of the war unscratched. - Corporate firms adapting the Modern Style. Striped from its original social program. - Modern Architecture proves to be failure in dealing with urban problems or social aspects - Zoning regulations urban renewal& anti-city theories of design added to the problem. - The result is Eroded urban fabrics, dull and dangerous built environments. - Suburbia and other urban sprawls as lived realities.
4. Design & planning theory: - The symbolic event of CIAM break up in Late 50s - The emerging new voices critiquing & questioning Modernism (Jacobs, Newman …) - Architectural journals boom supporting the different new schools of thought trying to solve problems of Modernism (the rise of theory). - A series of influential architectural exhibitions.
5. Design & planning practice: The Neo-Empiricists (according to Broadbent, recalling: Locke, Berkeley & Hume). Putting Venturi in this category with: - Cullen in Townscapes - Lynch in the image of the city - Alexander in pattern language - Robert Stern - Rowe & Koetter in collage city
6. The Wider cultural climate: Academic Architects tried to borrow new thought paradigms from other fields: Arts : Pop arts & its playing on scale and/or context to give new meanings for the ordinary. In addition to the use of mixed media (impurity). Op Art and its richness in complexity and contradiction Surrealism in minimizing the role of the artist
7. Science : Gestalt stating that the whole is more than the sum of its parts. & that the same thing in different contexts gives different meaning Phenomenology methods (systematic investigation of consciousness & its object)
12. Linguistics : The general trend to reject the vantage point of the author or subject in favor of the text or the object - Semiotics (Fernand De Saussure & Michel Foucault, Broadbent in architecture) - Structuralism (the true nature of things is in the relationships we construct & then perceive between them)
13. CONTENT: Focus: Eclectic compendium of visual examples in architecture illustrating the qualities of complexity and contradiction (between form & content, image & meaning, inside & outside …) Studying mostly architectural examples and reflecting on urban contexts bearing in mind that the level of complexity and contradiction will increase more and more as the reach the scale of the city. The last part including description for several projects designed by VSBA, and in which they tried to employ the ideas and theories embodied in the book.
14. Both-And rather than Either-Or Ambiguous rather than Articulated Ordinary rather than Original Compromising rather than Clear Mixed rather than Pure Complex rather than Simple Multiple rather than Monitory Vulgar rather than Heroic Both-And rather than Either-Or Ordinary rather than Original Mixed rather than Pure Multiple rather than Monitory Vulgar rather than Heroic Complex rather than Simple Ordinary rather than Original Ordinary rather than Original Ambiguous rather than Articulated Ordinary rather than Original Distorted rather than Straightforward Vulgar rather than Heroic Multiple rather than Monitory Distorted rather than Straightforward Complex rather than Simple Vulgar rather than Heroic Both-And rather than Either-Or Mixed rather than Pure Vulgar rather than Heroic Vulgar rather than Heroic Both-And rather than Either-Or Ordinary rather than Original Distorted rather than Straightforward Multiple rather than Monitory Ordinary rather than Original Both-And rather than Either-Or
15. Theory, Propositions The difficult whole, the difficult unity of inclusion rather than the easy unity of exclusion (the Modernists approach), is the method able to match the richness and ambiguity of the 20th century experience. A unity that creates tensions between the different fragments (as unresolved situation) and gives them new values and meanings in this new context. Principles: - Conscious sense of the past / the presence of the past. - Historical precedent is thoughtfully considered. - The multiple levels of meaning. Approaches & techniques: - Contradiction juxtaposed (the difficult whole) rather than contradiction adapted - Using elements in strange positions or contexts (Irony & parody) - Using Mixed media
16. Favored examples, forms & models: The ordinary (even the ugly) rather than the heroic & the original. Everyday landscape, the vulgar and disdained (lesions from Las Vegas -commercial strip, or the suburban town of Levittown -urban sprawl). Double functioning elements The complex architecture of Mannerists, Baroque, Lutyen, even some works of the modernist themselves particularly Le Courbiser, Kahn & Alto (with vitriol towards Mies & Wright)
17.
18. Continuing Validity: Vincent Scully while introducing the book compared it to le Corbusier's “Towards a New Architecture”, hailing it as: " among the few basic texts of our time …, despite its anti-heroic lack of pretension and its shift perspective from the Champs-Elysees to main street". This statement wasn't far from true as Venturi's "gentle manifesto" went through nine re-prints within twenty five year and was translated into sixteen languages. This book is considered to have the founding role (beside Rossi's “the Architecture of the city”) in the rise of Postmodernism and breaking the stranglehold of functionalist thought.