Presentation to ENDS conference, 20 April 2021.
Discussion of (1) the threat posed by upcoming EU regulatory developments on tobacco/nicotine; (2) the importance of understanding the underlying public health model; (3) the danger of perverse unintended consequences; (4) the adolescent vaping narrative and what is wrong with it; (5) the proactive alternative - risk-proportionate regulation.
1. The document discusses the potential for e-cigarettes and other reduced risk nicotine products to significantly reduce smoking-related harm and death on a global scale. It outlines scenarios where low-risk nicotine products could drive down the number of smokers from over 1 billion currently to just 5% of the global adult population by 2050.
2. However, it notes that an over-regulated environment that reduces product appeal and diversity could limit the public health benefits by decreasing the number of smokers who switch to less harmful alternatives. The document argues for a balanced, evidence-based approach that recognizes both the massive potential gains and relatively minor risks of low-risk nicotine products.
3. In conclusion, it advocates that
Louise Ross The Big Debate: e-cigarettes - an alternative to smoking?Clive Bates
This document summarizes a meeting organized by Education for Health and funded by Teva Respiratory to discuss e-cigarettes as an alternative to smoking. The document outlines what experts, Public Health England, stop smoking advisors, patients, and results of studies say about e-cigarettes. Experts believe e-cigarettes can help smokers quit and are a "gateway out of smoking." Public Health England says e-cigarettes combined with behavioral support lead to the highest quit rates. Advisors and patients report positive experiences with e-cigarettes in quitting smoking. Studies show e-cigarettes give a 20% greater success rate at quitting than nicotine replacement therapy alone.
Tobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a differenceClive Bates
The document discusses the success of e-cigarettes in helping smokers quit in Leicester City, UK. It notes that success rates were up to 20% higher using e-cigarettes compared to nicotine replacement therapy alone. A stop smoking service in Leicester City began offering free e-cigarette starter kits in 2014 and has seen consistently high quit rates each year since. Common myths about potential health harms, nicotine addiction, e-cigarettes not reflecting smoker preferences, gateway effects, and lack of evidence are addressed. Key organizations in the UK support e-cigarettes as much safer than smoking and effective for harm reduction.
This document discusses various issues related to the regulation of e-cigarettes and vaping. It notes that over-regulation can diminish returns and impose unnecessary costs and restrictions. Too much regulation could compromise product design and appeal, and allow larger tobacco companies to dominate at the expense of smaller manufacturers. There is concern that changing public perceptions of e-cigarettes, driven by misinformation about potential health risks that are not supported by science, could undermine their ability to help smokers quit and reduce harm. The document advocates an evidence-based approach to regulation and public messaging, highlighting that e-cigarettes are much less harmful than smoking and show promise as a smoking cessation tool.
Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...Clive Bates
This document discusses e-cigarettes and novel tobacco products. It argues that they are substantially less harmful than combustible cigarettes and have the potential to significantly reduce smoking rates and associated deaths. However, regulations should balance this potential benefit with preventing unintended consequences like perpetuating smoking or increasing youth uptake. The document proposes risk-proportionate regulations and taxes to incentivize switching from cigarettes, along with standards, marketing restrictions, and age limits, while ensuring products remain appealing to smokers trying to quit. The goal is harm reduction for populations according to the WHO framework convention on tobacco control.
This document summarizes information presented at a tobacco harm reduction conference on the public health benefits of tobacco harm reduction. It discusses estimates of the relative harm of nicotine products, value propositions for smokers to switch to lower-risk alternatives like e-cigarettes, real-world examples of smokers switching successfully to e-cigarettes, and projections of global cigarette consumption trends with and without the introduction of reduced-risk nicotine products. It also examines how moral panics have emerged around issues like e-cigarette poisoning, use by youth, hidden toxicants, and youth-oriented flavors.
Nicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm ReductionClive Bates
Presentación en línea para el seminario de políticas en Colombia enfocado en políticas de vapeo y consecuencias no deseadas /
Presentation online for policy seminar in Colombia focussed on vaping policy and unintended consequences
1. The document discusses the potential for e-cigarettes and other reduced risk nicotine products to significantly reduce smoking-related harm and death on a global scale. It outlines scenarios where low-risk nicotine products could drive down the number of smokers from over 1 billion currently to just 5% of the global adult population by 2050.
2. However, it notes that an over-regulated environment that reduces product appeal and diversity could limit the public health benefits by decreasing the number of smokers who switch to less harmful alternatives. The document argues for a balanced, evidence-based approach that recognizes both the massive potential gains and relatively minor risks of low-risk nicotine products.
3. In conclusion, it advocates that
Louise Ross The Big Debate: e-cigarettes - an alternative to smoking?Clive Bates
This document summarizes a meeting organized by Education for Health and funded by Teva Respiratory to discuss e-cigarettes as an alternative to smoking. The document outlines what experts, Public Health England, stop smoking advisors, patients, and results of studies say about e-cigarettes. Experts believe e-cigarettes can help smokers quit and are a "gateway out of smoking." Public Health England says e-cigarettes combined with behavioral support lead to the highest quit rates. Advisors and patients report positive experiences with e-cigarettes in quitting smoking. Studies show e-cigarettes give a 20% greater success rate at quitting than nicotine replacement therapy alone.
Tobacco harm reduction in the UK: e-cigarettes (EC) are making a differenceClive Bates
The document discusses the success of e-cigarettes in helping smokers quit in Leicester City, UK. It notes that success rates were up to 20% higher using e-cigarettes compared to nicotine replacement therapy alone. A stop smoking service in Leicester City began offering free e-cigarette starter kits in 2014 and has seen consistently high quit rates each year since. Common myths about potential health harms, nicotine addiction, e-cigarettes not reflecting smoker preferences, gateway effects, and lack of evidence are addressed. Key organizations in the UK support e-cigarettes as much safer than smoking and effective for harm reduction.
This document discusses various issues related to the regulation of e-cigarettes and vaping. It notes that over-regulation can diminish returns and impose unnecessary costs and restrictions. Too much regulation could compromise product design and appeal, and allow larger tobacco companies to dominate at the expense of smaller manufacturers. There is concern that changing public perceptions of e-cigarettes, driven by misinformation about potential health risks that are not supported by science, could undermine their ability to help smokers quit and reduce harm. The document advocates an evidence-based approach to regulation and public messaging, highlighting that e-cigarettes are much less harmful than smoking and show promise as a smoking cessation tool.
Innovation for Consumers: E-cigarettes and novel tobacco products - Part of t...Clive Bates
This document discusses e-cigarettes and novel tobacco products. It argues that they are substantially less harmful than combustible cigarettes and have the potential to significantly reduce smoking rates and associated deaths. However, regulations should balance this potential benefit with preventing unintended consequences like perpetuating smoking or increasing youth uptake. The document proposes risk-proportionate regulations and taxes to incentivize switching from cigarettes, along with standards, marketing restrictions, and age limits, while ensuring products remain appealing to smokers trying to quit. The goal is harm reduction for populations according to the WHO framework convention on tobacco control.
This document summarizes information presented at a tobacco harm reduction conference on the public health benefits of tobacco harm reduction. It discusses estimates of the relative harm of nicotine products, value propositions for smokers to switch to lower-risk alternatives like e-cigarettes, real-world examples of smokers switching successfully to e-cigarettes, and projections of global cigarette consumption trends with and without the introduction of reduced-risk nicotine products. It also examines how moral panics have emerged around issues like e-cigarette poisoning, use by youth, hidden toxicants, and youth-oriented flavors.
Nicotina - Reducción de riesgos y daños / Nicotine - Risk and Harm ReductionClive Bates
Presentación en línea para el seminario de políticas en Colombia enfocado en políticas de vapeo y consecuencias no deseadas /
Presentation online for policy seminar in Colombia focussed on vaping policy and unintended consequences
Respect Vapers Ireland - webinar on tobacco harm reductionClive Bates
This document summarizes six key things to know about tobacco harm reduction:
1. Smoking prevalence remains high despite efforts. New reduced risk nicotine products like e-cigarettes can help obsolete cigarettes.
2. Expert reviews find e-cigarettes are much less harmful than smoking and can help smokers quit. However, risk perceptions are often exaggerated.
3. The public health benefit comes from addicted smokers switching to less harmful options, not from promoting e-cigarette use alone.
4. Policies should balance appropriate youth protections with supporting harm reduction for adults. Overly restrictive policies can backfire by perpetuating smoking.
This document outlines six insights on harm reduction:
1. Policies should focus on actual harm rather than products themselves. Harm from smoking, alcohol, drugs, gambling, etc. should be the focus.
2. Policies themselves can cause unintended harm, such as bans on e-cigarettes increasing smoking rates in some cases. The potential harms of policies must be considered.
3. Context is important when considering harm reduction policies. What works in one situation may not be effective in another due to differing contexts.
4. Policies should consider who is actually at risk rather than entire populations. For issues like obesity and salt, not all groups face the same degree of risk.
5. Appro
This document provides information on vaping and tobacco harm reduction. It discusses how smoking kills over 96,000 people annually in the UK and notes that median smokers lose 10 years of life expectancy. It then examines smoking prevalence data in different areas and populations in the UK. The document discusses evidence that vaping is substantially less harmful than smoking and may help smokers quit. It notes concerns that restrictive policies could perpetuate smoking. The summary concludes by outlining a framework for risk-proportionate regulation of tobacco and nicotine products.
Vaping and tobacco: six things you need to know about harm reductionClive Bates
1. Smoking has not gone away
2. Technologies to obsolete cigarettes
3. Risks and risk (mis)perceptions
4. The public health mechanism and the pleasure principle
5. The youth vaping epidemic – a harder look
6. Policymaking and perverse consequences
Tobacco Harm Reduction - an introductionClive Bates
This document provides an introduction to tobacco harm reduction and alternative nicotine products such as e-cigarettes. It summarizes statements from public health organizations that find e-cigarettes to be much less harmful than combustible cigarettes. Research shows e-cigarettes help smokers quit at the population level and are effective cessation tools. The document argues for risk-proportionate regulation and taxation of nicotine products to incentivize smokers to switch to less harmful options and further reduce smoking rates.
The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020Clive Bates
My presentation for a Food and Drug Law Institute webinar on the FDA's Modified Risk Tobacco Product process for making risk-related claims about tobacco and nicotine products
NYU College of Global Health - E-cigarette seminar - New YorkClive Bates
E-Cigarettes: The Tectonic Shift in Nicotine and Tobacco Consumption: Opportunity or Threat to Saving Lives?
Clive Bates
Friday, October 19, 2018
NYU School of Law, Greenberg Lounge
40 Washington Square South, New York, New York
Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...Clive Bates
My presentation covering why 'less is more' when it comes to regulating low risk alternatives to cigarettes such as e-cigarettes. Too much regulation will limit appeal, increase costs, raise barriers to entry and inhibit innovation. I also urge a focus on the huge potential benefits of low-risk alternatives to smoking instead of obsession over minor or implausible risks.
Reduced nicotine rule: a terrible idea to be pursued relentlesslyClive Bates
This document summarizes arguments against reducing nicotine levels in cigarettes to zero. It claims that such a policy would be:
1) A prohibition that would lead to unpredictable consumer responses like importing black market cigarettes or switching to other tobacco products.
2) Based on little relevant research about how consumers would react.
3) Likely to have perverse public health consequences as consumers find alternative ways to get nicotine.
4) Not mandated or supported by existing tobacco control laws.
What is wrong (and right) about the Tobacco Products Directive approach to E-...Clive Bates
These are the visual aids for my talk on the truly dreadful European Union Tobacco Products Directive as it applies to e-cigarettes, and why Totally Wicked has a legal case against it.
Prohibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgameClive Bates
This document discusses competing visions for reducing tobacco-related harm and cigarette consumption globally by 2040. It summarizes the view that prohibition of cigarettes is unlikely to succeed and may backfire, while introducing reduced-risk nicotine products could displace smoking if regulated appropriately. Charts show global cigarette consumption trends and hypothetical scenarios where safer nicotine products capture market share from cigarettes. The argument is made for an approach that balances public health, individual rights, and business interests to maximize harm reduction opportunities.
Tobacco harm reduction - meetings with Hill staff Clive Bates
This document discusses efforts to reduce smoking and associated harms. It notes that while 36.5 million Americans smoke, consuming 264 billion cigarettes in 2015, smoking causes over 480,000 deaths per year at a cost of over $300 billion. New reduced-risk nicotine products like e-cigarettes and heated tobacco have potential to significantly reduce smoking's toll if made accessible through sensible regulation rather than restrictive policies that protect the cigarette trade. The Royal College of Physicians reviewed evidence that e-cigarettes are much less harmful than smoking and effective for smoking cessation. Most youth e-cigarette use involves just flavors without nicotine. Banning flavors could undermine harm reduction efforts. The proposed Cole-Bishop bill offers a responsible
Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...Clive Bates
My critique of the proposal that regulators should reduce the concentration of nicotine in cigarettes to a sub-addictive level - effectively a prohibition of cigarettes as we know them.
Presentation at SRNT 2017 in Florence, Italy on 8 March 2017.
E-cigarette Summit - The New Tobacco Wars - 7 December 2021Clive Bates
The presentation gives my take on the conflict raging in tobacco control. It looks at where things are going wrong in science, risk communication, policy, and youth politics. It then looks at causes: institutional and cultural inertia. And finally, finds hope in the basic processes of innovation.
Bad science - 10 insights for advocatesClive Bates
1. Science and evidence is often overrated, and intuitions come before strategic reasoning.
2. Arguments should be proportional to the issue; don't bring a knife to a gun fight.
3. Authority from experts can be leveraged; a quote from the Royal College of Physicians said e-cigarette risks are unlikely to exceed 5% of smoking risks, and may be lower.
Regulation of Tobacco Harm Reduction - GFN 2018 ScholarsClive Bates
Global Forum on Nicotine 2018 Scholars meeting on regulation discusses optimum regulation using 4 Ps of marketing framework to consider risk-proportionate regulation
Effects of alternative nicotine delivery systems on cigarette consumption and...Clive Bates
This document summarizes a presentation on the effects of alternative nicotine delivery systems like e-cigarettes on cigarette consumption and smoking prevalence. It discusses data showing declines in smoking rates in countries where vaping products are widely available and accepted like the US, UK, and Sweden. Studies suggest vaping helps increase smoking cessation rates at a population level. The rise of Juul products in the US may have accelerated declines in youth smoking rates there in recent years. Countries in Asia have also seen significant drops in cigarette sales as heat-not-burn tobacco and vaping products gain popularity. However, public health attitudes can influence how quickly reduced risk alternatives are adopted.
Slides on the current situation with global cigarette consumption and trends, and how new nicotine products could change things.
See blog at: http://www.clivebates.com/?p=2782 for more commentary.
African Harm Reduction Exchange - Dec 2022Clive Bates
The science behind Tobacco Harm Reduction …and how it impacts policy development and regulation
1. Smoking is the main problem
2. Smokefree products and science
3. Policy and unintended consequences
4. Innovation (and its enemies)
India - Economic Times - Consumer Freedom Conclave - 24 Feb 2022Clive Bates
Tobacco harm reduction: the biggest public health win of the 21st Century?
1. Tobacco harm reduction
2. Risk communication
3. Policymaking
4. Cause of opposition
5. Innovation
Respect Vapers Ireland - webinar on tobacco harm reductionClive Bates
This document summarizes six key things to know about tobacco harm reduction:
1. Smoking prevalence remains high despite efforts. New reduced risk nicotine products like e-cigarettes can help obsolete cigarettes.
2. Expert reviews find e-cigarettes are much less harmful than smoking and can help smokers quit. However, risk perceptions are often exaggerated.
3. The public health benefit comes from addicted smokers switching to less harmful options, not from promoting e-cigarette use alone.
4. Policies should balance appropriate youth protections with supporting harm reduction for adults. Overly restrictive policies can backfire by perpetuating smoking.
This document outlines six insights on harm reduction:
1. Policies should focus on actual harm rather than products themselves. Harm from smoking, alcohol, drugs, gambling, etc. should be the focus.
2. Policies themselves can cause unintended harm, such as bans on e-cigarettes increasing smoking rates in some cases. The potential harms of policies must be considered.
3. Context is important when considering harm reduction policies. What works in one situation may not be effective in another due to differing contexts.
4. Policies should consider who is actually at risk rather than entire populations. For issues like obesity and salt, not all groups face the same degree of risk.
5. Appro
This document provides information on vaping and tobacco harm reduction. It discusses how smoking kills over 96,000 people annually in the UK and notes that median smokers lose 10 years of life expectancy. It then examines smoking prevalence data in different areas and populations in the UK. The document discusses evidence that vaping is substantially less harmful than smoking and may help smokers quit. It notes concerns that restrictive policies could perpetuate smoking. The summary concludes by outlining a framework for risk-proportionate regulation of tobacco and nicotine products.
Vaping and tobacco: six things you need to know about harm reductionClive Bates
1. Smoking has not gone away
2. Technologies to obsolete cigarettes
3. Risks and risk (mis)perceptions
4. The public health mechanism and the pleasure principle
5. The youth vaping epidemic – a harder look
6. Policymaking and perverse consequences
Tobacco Harm Reduction - an introductionClive Bates
This document provides an introduction to tobacco harm reduction and alternative nicotine products such as e-cigarettes. It summarizes statements from public health organizations that find e-cigarettes to be much less harmful than combustible cigarettes. Research shows e-cigarettes help smokers quit at the population level and are effective cessation tools. The document argues for risk-proportionate regulation and taxation of nicotine products to incentivize smokers to switch to less harmful options and further reduce smoking rates.
The MRTP process - Seven provocations - FDLI webinar 30 July 2020Clive Bates
My presentation for a Food and Drug Law Institute webinar on the FDA's Modified Risk Tobacco Product process for making risk-related claims about tobacco and nicotine products
NYU College of Global Health - E-cigarette seminar - New YorkClive Bates
E-Cigarettes: The Tectonic Shift in Nicotine and Tobacco Consumption: Opportunity or Threat to Saving Lives?
Clive Bates
Friday, October 19, 2018
NYU School of Law, Greenberg Lounge
40 Washington Square South, New York, New York
Regulation: why less is more... E-cigarette Summit 12 November 2013 - Clive B...Clive Bates
My presentation covering why 'less is more' when it comes to regulating low risk alternatives to cigarettes such as e-cigarettes. Too much regulation will limit appeal, increase costs, raise barriers to entry and inhibit innovation. I also urge a focus on the huge potential benefits of low-risk alternatives to smoking instead of obsession over minor or implausible risks.
Reduced nicotine rule: a terrible idea to be pursued relentlesslyClive Bates
This document summarizes arguments against reducing nicotine levels in cigarettes to zero. It claims that such a policy would be:
1) A prohibition that would lead to unpredictable consumer responses like importing black market cigarettes or switching to other tobacco products.
2) Based on little relevant research about how consumers would react.
3) Likely to have perverse public health consequences as consumers find alternative ways to get nicotine.
4) Not mandated or supported by existing tobacco control laws.
What is wrong (and right) about the Tobacco Products Directive approach to E-...Clive Bates
These are the visual aids for my talk on the truly dreadful European Union Tobacco Products Directive as it applies to e-cigarettes, and why Totally Wicked has a legal case against it.
Prohibition or profit motive: competing visions for the endgameClive Bates
This document discusses competing visions for reducing tobacco-related harm and cigarette consumption globally by 2040. It summarizes the view that prohibition of cigarettes is unlikely to succeed and may backfire, while introducing reduced-risk nicotine products could displace smoking if regulated appropriately. Charts show global cigarette consumption trends and hypothetical scenarios where safer nicotine products capture market share from cigarettes. The argument is made for an approach that balances public health, individual rights, and business interests to maximize harm reduction opportunities.
Tobacco harm reduction - meetings with Hill staff Clive Bates
This document discusses efforts to reduce smoking and associated harms. It notes that while 36.5 million Americans smoke, consuming 264 billion cigarettes in 2015, smoking causes over 480,000 deaths per year at a cost of over $300 billion. New reduced-risk nicotine products like e-cigarettes and heated tobacco have potential to significantly reduce smoking's toll if made accessible through sensible regulation rather than restrictive policies that protect the cigarette trade. The Royal College of Physicians reviewed evidence that e-cigarettes are much less harmful than smoking and effective for smoking cessation. Most youth e-cigarette use involves just flavors without nicotine. Banning flavors could undermine harm reduction efforts. The proposed Cole-Bishop bill offers a responsible
Is nicotine reduction a viable policy for tobacco control? No, Definitely not...Clive Bates
My critique of the proposal that regulators should reduce the concentration of nicotine in cigarettes to a sub-addictive level - effectively a prohibition of cigarettes as we know them.
Presentation at SRNT 2017 in Florence, Italy on 8 March 2017.
E-cigarette Summit - The New Tobacco Wars - 7 December 2021Clive Bates
The presentation gives my take on the conflict raging in tobacco control. It looks at where things are going wrong in science, risk communication, policy, and youth politics. It then looks at causes: institutional and cultural inertia. And finally, finds hope in the basic processes of innovation.
Bad science - 10 insights for advocatesClive Bates
1. Science and evidence is often overrated, and intuitions come before strategic reasoning.
2. Arguments should be proportional to the issue; don't bring a knife to a gun fight.
3. Authority from experts can be leveraged; a quote from the Royal College of Physicians said e-cigarette risks are unlikely to exceed 5% of smoking risks, and may be lower.
Regulation of Tobacco Harm Reduction - GFN 2018 ScholarsClive Bates
Global Forum on Nicotine 2018 Scholars meeting on regulation discusses optimum regulation using 4 Ps of marketing framework to consider risk-proportionate regulation
Effects of alternative nicotine delivery systems on cigarette consumption and...Clive Bates
This document summarizes a presentation on the effects of alternative nicotine delivery systems like e-cigarettes on cigarette consumption and smoking prevalence. It discusses data showing declines in smoking rates in countries where vaping products are widely available and accepted like the US, UK, and Sweden. Studies suggest vaping helps increase smoking cessation rates at a population level. The rise of Juul products in the US may have accelerated declines in youth smoking rates there in recent years. Countries in Asia have also seen significant drops in cigarette sales as heat-not-burn tobacco and vaping products gain popularity. However, public health attitudes can influence how quickly reduced risk alternatives are adopted.
Slides on the current situation with global cigarette consumption and trends, and how new nicotine products could change things.
See blog at: http://www.clivebates.com/?p=2782 for more commentary.
African Harm Reduction Exchange - Dec 2022Clive Bates
The science behind Tobacco Harm Reduction …and how it impacts policy development and regulation
1. Smoking is the main problem
2. Smokefree products and science
3. Policy and unintended consequences
4. Innovation (and its enemies)
India - Economic Times - Consumer Freedom Conclave - 24 Feb 2022Clive Bates
Tobacco harm reduction: the biggest public health win of the 21st Century?
1. Tobacco harm reduction
2. Risk communication
3. Policymaking
4. Cause of opposition
5. Innovation
Beyond Cigarettes: The Risks of Non-Cigarette Nicotine Products and Implicati...Center on Addiction
Whereas much is known about the effects of tobacco use, the current state of knowledge regarding non-cigarette nicotine products, such as electronic nicotine delivery systems (e-cigarettes and other vaping devices), water pipe/hookah, smokeless tobacco, pipes, cigars, little cigars, and cigarillos, that do not contain tobacco is not robust enough to yield a definitive consensus regarding their relative risks and benefits.
10 provocations on why FDA's regulation of tobacco and nicotine is failing the American public. My presentation to the US E-cigarette Summit 2022 in Washington DC, with bonus content of additional background slides added in.
Barriers and unintended consequences How poor regulation of low-risk alternat...Clive Bates
A shirt presentation to Georgian health experts on the dangers of excessive regulation of safer alternatives to smoking causing perverse unintended consequences.
Over the past 50 years, cigarette smoking and other combusted tobacco products have caused over 20 million American deaths. The tobacco epidemic was driven by misleading and aggressive strategies of the tobacco industry. While electronic nicotine delivery systems like e-cigarettes may help reduce harm if they replace combusted tobacco entirely, they must be regulated to prevent youth uptake and minimize risks. The 2014 Surgeon General's report recommends fully funding tobacco control programs, raising cigarette taxes, and making cessation treatment widely available to continue progress against the tobacco epidemic.
This document discusses the health hazards of smoking, particularly for youth and college students. It notes that most smokers start as teenagers and that 50% of smokers die prematurely from smoking-related illnesses. Exposure to secondhand smoke can cause various health issues for children. Each day, over 1,200 Americans die from smoking. The document then outlines smoking rates among college students and predicts that over 1 million current college students will die prematurely from tobacco use. It discusses the environmental and economic impacts of smoking and the leadership of government agencies in promoting smoke-free policies and smoking cessation programs.
The Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) was established in June 2010 to implement the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. The CTP aims to reduce tobacco use through preventing youth initiation, promoting cessation, informing consumers, and developing science-based regulations. Tobacco use remains the leading preventable cause of death in the US, killing over 400,000 Americans annually. While adult smoking rates had declined for decades, the rate has now stalled at around 20%. Youth smoking rates have also plateaued despite health initiatives. The CTP will enforce new graphic health warnings, restrictions on misleading terms like "light" and "mild", and potential regulation of modified risk claims. It will continue implementing the Tobacco Control Act to protect public
Dr. Terry F. Pechacek, professor of health management and policy at the School of Public Health at Georgia State University, discusses strategies for tobacco control, including the impact of of e-cigarettes.
The document discusses tobacco cessation and control. It outlines the diseases caused by smoking in both children and adults. It recommends offering help to quit tobacco use through cessation advice, legislation, and pharmacological therapy. Health professionals have an important role to play in tobacco control through advising patients, promoting tobacco-free policies, and building cessation infrastructure. Brief counseling and motivational interventions can help patients quit smoking. Government initiatives like the COTPA act have implemented various bans and warnings. Increasing tobacco taxes and prices is also effective for reducing consumption. The National Tobacco Control Programme aims to reduce tobacco use in India.
This document discusses the changing landscape of tobacco control and the role of e-cigarettes. It notes that traditional smoking cessation methods are becoming less effective and that the population is segmenting into different tobacco and nicotine product users. The document argues that e-cigarettes can play a key role in tobacco control by providing a less harmful alternative. It contends that embracing e-cigarettes could help reduce smoking rates and prevent smoking-related deaths and disease, while not normalizing smoking. The document suggests that local public health services should support e-cigarette use as part of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy.
Electronic Cigarette Regulations: When Less is Moreecigarettesummit
Clive Bates, speaker at E-Cigarette Summit London, discusses regulations surrounding electronic cigarettes. He points out that tight regulations could harm the e-cig industry and push people back to smoking tobacco. Visit: http://ecigarettereviewed.com/e-cigarette-summit-london-summary
The end of what? UK E-cigarette Summit 2023Clive Bates
The extended version of my presentation to the UK E-cigarette summit 16 November 2023. We look at the following:
1. End of harm or end of nicotine
2. The demand for nicotine
3. The future market for nicotine
4. False risk perceptions
5. Who is to blame
This document discusses tobacco control strategies according to the WHO MPOWER framework. It summarizes the six policies of MPOWER: Monitor tobacco use and prevention policies; Protect people from tobacco smoke; Offer help to quit tobacco use; Warn about the dangers of tobacco; Enforce bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship; and Raise taxes on tobacco. For each policy, it provides details on effective implementation strategies, such as establishing comprehensive smoke-free laws and public education campaigns about the health risks of tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure.
This document discusses policies to prevent youth smoking in Colorado. It notes that tobacco kills over 4,400 people in Colorado each year, and 80-90% of smokers start by age 18. The tobacco industry spends over $12.5 billion annually on marketing, including $170.7 million in Colorado. New nicotine products like e-cigarettes are also increasing in popularity among youth. The document proposes several policy options to reduce youth access and initiation, including increasing cigarette taxes, enacting retailer licensing laws, restricting flavored products and sales near schools, and updating the tobacco-free schools law. There is strong evidence that limiting youth access through these types of policies can effectively reduce smoking rates.
This document provides an overview of smoking in India and strategies to combat it. Some key points:
- Smoking kills over 1 million Indians annually and rates are increasing. It causes many diseases and premature death.
- Peer pressure, desire to fit in, and stress/mental health issues drive youth smoking despite health education.
- Objectives include reducing youth smoking initiation and exposure, empowering communities, and promoting partnerships between NGOs and government.
- Proposed strategies involve preventing smoking through education, helping current smokers quit by increasing barriers and support, with a focus on youth, females, and high-risk groups. Budgets, media allocation, and segmentation of audiences are also discussed.
FDLI - Lesson for the US from other jurisdictions - the United Kingdom -29 Oc...Clive Bates
Presentation on the most significant differences between US and UK/EU regulation of tobacco and vaping products. FDLI Tobacco and Nicotine Products Regulation and Policy Conference
Similar to Competent or careless? Directions in European policy on low-risk nicotine products (20)
FDLI Annual 2024: seven reasons why the litigation will never stopClive Bates
I give seven reaons underpinning the conflicts between FDA and vape companies...
1. Evidential burdens
2. Opaque success criteria
3. Defining APPH
4. Naivety about youth
5. De facto standard setting
6. Assessing products in isolation
7. Poor market surveillance
US E-cigarette Summit: Taming the nicotine industrial complexClive Bates
I look back to 1997 and simpler time in tobacco control, then look at changes in trade, communications, technology and conclude the market is becoming ungovernable
The APPH Standard: What Does it Actually Mean?Clive Bates
My presentation at the Food & Drug Law Institute Tobacco and Nicotine conference 26 October 2023. I discuss five problems with the APPH concept:
1. No means of trading off different types of benefits and detriments
2. Ignores vaping benefits to youth
3. Blind to harmful unintended consequences of marketing denial orders
4. Impossible to estimate population effects at the product level - the standard only makes sense at the category level.
5. The aggregate effect of thousands of single product PMTA determinations may create adverse effects not captured in any individual application (de fact flavour ban)
I finish with three broad proposals:
1. Assess individual risk and marketing strategy pre-market
2. Assess population effects when it is actually possible to observe them - post-market
3. Conduct a single comprehensive market assessment covering all products, including illicit trade
Rethinking nicotine: illusions, delusions and some conclusionsClive Bates
presentation to the UK E-cigarette Summit on 9 December 2022. Looks at how our approach to nicotine must evolve from a "tobacco harm reduction" to treating nicotine like a socially acceptable recreational stimulant with minimal harm.
Albania National Association of Public health - Harm Reduction ConferenceClive Bates
Seven insights into tobacco harm reduction (20 min version) 20th December 2021.
1.The problem is smoking
2. Smoke-free alternatives
3. Quitting smoking with smoke-free alternatives
4. Health concerns
5. Youth vaping
6. Policy and unintended consequences
7. Innovation (and its enemies)
Seven insights into tobacco harm reductionClive Bates
1st Tobacco Harm Reduction Malaysia Scientific Meeting
21 November 2021.
1. The problem is smoking
2. Smoke-free alternatives
3. Quitting smoking with smoke-free alternatives
4. Health concerns
5. Youth vaping
6. Policy and unintended consequences
7. Innovation (and its enemies)
E-cigarette Summit US presentation 2018Clive Bates
My presentation at the E-cigarette Summit Washington DC, 30 April 2018. "The urge to ban: 10 questions to ask first" calling for calm over flavors and the latest moral panic over JUUL.
This document outlines what good regulation of vaping products and e-cigarettes could look like according to the author. The key points are:
1. Set product standards for devices, liquids, and testing to ensure quality and safety while allowing for innovation.
2. Allow owners of various establishments like bars, hotels, and workplaces to make their own vaping policies instead of outright bans.
3. Permit advertising of vaping products to adults but with responsible guidelines, and promote meaningful risk communication to encourage informed choice over scare tactics.
4. Consider risk-based taxation that does not tax vaping products the same as combustible cigarettes or spread the tax rates too widely between products.
5
The Antyodaya Saral Haryana Portal is a pioneering initiative by the Government of Haryana aimed at providing citizens with seamless access to a wide range of government services
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
Food safety, prepare for the unexpected - So what can be done in order to be ready to address food safety, food Consumers, food producers and manufacturers, food transporters, food businesses, food retailers can ...
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).Christina Parmionova
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
Preliminary findings _OECD field visits to ten regions in the TSI EU mining r...OECDregions
Preliminary findings from OECD field visits for the project: Enhancing EU Mining Regional Ecosystems to Support the Green Transition and Secure Mineral Raw Materials Supply.
Donate to charity during this holiday seasonSERUDS INDIA
For people who have money and are philanthropic, there are infinite opportunities to gift a needy person or child a Merry Christmas. Even if you are living on a shoestring budget, you will be surprised at how much you can do.
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-to-donate-to-charity-during-this-holiday-season/
#charityforchildren, #donateforchildren, #donateclothesforchildren, #donatebooksforchildren, #donatetoysforchildren, #sponsorforchildren, #sponsorclothesforchildren, #sponsorbooksforchildren, #sponsortoysforchildren, #seruds, #kurnool
3. Europe’s beating cancer plan – February 2021
• Commission will continue to prioritise protecting young people from the harmful effects of tobacco
and related products
• Decisive action will be taken by reviewing the Tobacco Products Directive, the Tobacco Taxation
Directive and
• The legal framework on cross-border purchases of tobacco by private individuals.
• This includes working in full transparency towards plain packaging and a full ban on flavours, using
existing EU agencies to improve the assessment of ingredients,
• Tackling tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship on the internet and social media.
• Update Council Recommendation on SmokeFree Environments both extending its coverage to
emerging products, such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, and expanding smoke-free
environments, including outdoor spaces.
• In addition, the EU track and trace system will be extended to all tobacco products by 2024.
3
4. European legislative developments
4
Tobacco Excise Directive
2011/64/EU
Tobacco Advertising Directive
2003/33/EC
• Inclusion of more products
• Minimum excise levels
• Choice of tax base
• Maximums and differentials?
• No change in sight
Tobacco Products Directive
2014/40/EC
• Flavours and Ingredients
• Nicotine
• Medicalisation
• No relaxation of bad regulation
4Q 2021 or 1Q 2022
Mid-2022
Not applicable
5. Tax posture – 5 elements
5
1. No tax justified
2. Zero minimum rate
3. Maximum
4. Tax base: mg nicotine?
5. Cigarette equivalence factor
6. Tobacco Products
Directive
2014/40/EU
Article 20 (1)
Medical
Medicines
Directive
2001/83/EC
Medical Devices
Directive
93/42/EEC
Consumer
Tobacco Products
Directive
Article 20 ( 2-13)
Pathways for ENDS in the Tobacco Products Directive
6
10. The public health mechanism is not “smoking cessation medication”
Harm reduction = Reduced risk x Number who switch
Product toxicity &
other risks
Proportion who succeed
Who tries and how
many
Harm reduction equation (simplified)
Appeal and
user choice
10
11. The public health mechanism: consumer “value propositions” – the 7 Ps
Value
Price
Promotion
Place
Product
Positioning
People
Packaging
11
Adapted from: Bitner MJ, Booms BH (1981). Marketing Strategies and Organization Structure for Service Firms.
Conference Proceedings: American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL,.
12. The public health mechanism: rival “value propositions”
Tobacco control
Smoking
Price
Promotion
Place
Product
Positioning
People
Packaging
Degrade the value
Tobacco harm reduction
Enhance the value to smokers
12
13. 2. The public health mechanism: rival “value propositions”
Tobacco control
Smoking
Price
Promotion
Place
Product
Positioning
People
Packaging
Degrade the value
Tobacco control
Degrade the value to everyone
13
14. Evidence for beneficial population effect ‘triangulates’
• Also, user testimony
• And… it is what you would expect!!
14
Professor Robert West, UCL. Presentation at SRNT-Europe 2019
15. Five messages
1. The threat
2. The public health model
3. The unintended consequences
15
16. …if a risk-averse, precautionary approach
makes e-cigarettes:
• less easily accessible
• less palatable or acceptable
• more expensive
• less consumer friendly
• pharmacologically less effective
• inhibits innovation …
…then it causes harm by perpetuating
smoking.
Royal College of Physicians – unintended consequences
16
Royal College of Physicians. Nicotine without smoke: tobacco harm reduction London: RCP; 2016.
17. Taxing economic substitutes
17
… implementing differential
taxes on nicotine-yielding
products on the basis of degree
of risk could substantially
expedite the move away from
cigarette smoking
Chaloupka FJ, Sweanor D, Warner KE. Differential Taxes for Differential Risks — Toward Reduced Harm from Nicotine-Yielding Products.
N Engl J Med 2015;373(7):594–597.
18. 18
High e-cigarette tax
More smokers
Pesko MF, Courtemanche CJ, Maclean JC. The effects of traditional cigarette and e-cigarette tax rates on adult tobacco product use. J Risk Uncertain 2020
20. 20
Highlights
• E-cigarette advertising on TV causes
adult smokers to quit.
• A ban on these ads would have
reduced the number of smokers who
quit by 3%.
• A more relaxed regulatory
environment might have increased
the quit rate by 10%.
Dave D, Dench D, Grossman M, Kenkel DS, Saffer H. Does e-cigarette advertising encourage
adult smokers to quit? J Health Econ ];68:102227.
21. 21
Don’t be socially irresponsible
Don’t target or feature children
Don’t confuse e-cigarettes with tobacco products
Don’t make health or safety claims
Don’t make smoking cessation claims
Don’t mislead about product ingredients
Don’t mislead about where products may be use
Set standards avoid bans
23. Perverse consequences: flavour bans
Tobacco
Fruit
Dessert
or pastry
Choc,
sweets
Russell et al. vaping
flavour preferences
Russell C, et al. Changing patterns of first e-cigarette flavor used and current flavors used by
20,836 adult frequent e-cigarette users in the USA. Harm Reduct J. BioMed Central; 2018 23
24. CDC, Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and
High School Students — United States, 2019, Table 6 (simplified)
Reasons for e-cigarette use among middle and high
school students who reported using e-cigarettes and
other tobacco products during the past 30 days
Reason given for vaping
Use e-cigarettes
only
Use e-
cigarettes and
other tobacco
products
I was curious about them 56.1% 38.4 %
Friend or family member used them 23.9% 22.2%
They are available in flavors, such as
mint, candy, fruit, or chocolate
22.3% 26.6 %
I can use them to do tricks 22.0% 29.0%
They are less harmful than other
forms of tobacco, such as cigarettes
17.2% 19.1%
Adolescents are curious
24
25. Possible consequences – a flavour ban
• The intended outcome - abstinence from nicotine and not adopting any other risk behaviour
• Using tobacco flavoured vape products instead of other flavoured products
• Accessing flavoured vapes via an illicit supply chain (a black market)
• Relapsing back from vaping to smoking – both teenagers and adults
• Not switching from smoking to vaping and continuing to smoke
• Continuing to smoke or to start smoking as an adolescent because parents or adult role models smoke instead of vaping
• Using other tobacco or nicotine products – hand-rolling tobacco, smokeless tobacco, heated tobacco, or new nicotine pouches
• Buying from foreign suppliers in person or via the internet and importing for personal use
• Buying from foreign suppliers to resell to others through informal networks
• Making and mixing their own flavours at home or buying or selling home-mixed flavours
• Using vapes that are made to look tobacco flavoured but have other flavours
• Using flavour agents for food, drink or aromatherapy for adding to unflavoured nicotine liquids
• Using flavours made for vaping but ostensibly marketed for another purpose
• Switching to cannabinoid (THC or CBD) vapes
• Initiating smoking instead of initiating vaping
• Adopting another risk behaviour that may be worse
25
26. Five messages
1. The threat
2. The public health model
3. The unintended consequences
4. Concern about teenage vaping
26
29. Youth smoking has fallen rapidly
29
Rate of decline
post-2010 is 4 times
greater than 1975-
2010
3 times
30. Youth risk behaviors in context – United States 2017
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
E-cigarette Smoking any
combusible
tobacco
Marijuana Alcohol Binge
drinking
Drink driver
riding as
passenger
Carried a
weapon
Texting while
driving
Percentage
of
high
school
students
Past 30 day prevalence – high school students NYTS and YRBS
2019
2018
2017
2020
Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance — United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ 2018;67(No. SS-8):1–114.
* Refers to driver or passengers riding in vehicles where the driver had been drinking.
31.
32. Five messages
1. The threat
2. The public health model
3. The unintended consequences
4. Concern about teenage vaping
5. Risk proportionate regulation
32
33. Risk-Proportionate Regulation
Measure Cigarettes, hand-rolling tobacco and other
combustibles
Vaping, heated tobacco smokeless and oral
nicotine
Taxation Relatively high taxes Low or zero tax (sales tax only)
Illicit trade Track and trace (FCTC protocol) Complaint-driven
Advertising Prohibit other than within trade Control themes and placement
Warnings Graphic warnings depicting disease Messages encouraging switching
Public places Legally mandated controls Up to the discretion of the owner
Plain packaging Yes No
Ingredients Control reward-enhancing additives Blacklist material health hazards
Flavours Prohibit Allow, subject to health hazards
Flavour descriptors Not applicable if flavours banned Control appeal to youth/trademarks
Age restrictions No sales to under-21s No sales to under-18s
Internet sales Banned Permitted with age controls
Product standards Control risks and reduce appeal Control risks
33
34. Five messages
1. The threat
2. The public health model
3. The unintended consequences
4. Concern about teenage vaping
5. Risk proportionate regulation
34
Don’t worry if you aren’t mathematical… this is just codifying common sense….
The simple idea is that a the impact of reduced risk alternative to cigarettes is the risk reduction per user multiplied by the number of users who switch. Both terms are important.
The first term is really determined by toxic exposure arising from continued nicotine use – a product characteristic. For e-cigs and snus this is 95-99% - at least 20-fold improvement…
The second term is why we don’t want to be too prescriptive and end up dissuading people from take the 95-99% reduction and carrying on with the greatest danger.
That’s why alarm bells should ring when there are plans to restrict reduced risk only to the ‘cleanest and safest’ - or there are plans to ban things that might make these products attractive – like flavourings – or to have regulators control ingredients – or attempt to remove all residual toxins (some of which might be important for flavour)
The consumer and mechanisms of market competition should be the primary driver of what makes these products attractive – not regulators who may insist they are safe at the expense of making them less attractive
[The equation could be elaborated to have a second term… those that use the reduced risk products who would otherwise have stopped completely. Not shown here because the residual risk is so low – the reduced risk products are not that much difference to quitting completely].