2. INTRODUCTION
BOTH LIVING IN THE CITY AND LIVING IN THE
VILLAGE HAS THEIR OWN CHARMS AND
ATTRACTIONS, AND YET THEY OFFER VASTLY
DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES TO THEIR RESIDENTS
AND VISITORS. COMPARING AND CONTRASTING
THE TWO PLACES BASED ON THEIR COST OF
LIVING AND THEIR TRANSPORTATIONS SHOW
HOW DIFFERENT AND SIMILAR THE TWO ARE.
3. Cost of Living
F I R S T
P A R A G R A P H
• For people who are living in the cities, the cost of living
there can be quite expensive as healthcare, groceries and
housing fees.
• For the ones who live in the village, the low cost of living
would be bearable as groceries are easily accessible,
healthcare is quite reasonable and the housing fees are not
expensive.
• Hence, living in the village has a low cost of living
compared to the high cost of living for living in the city.
• People in the city has similar access to healthcare,
groceries and housing with those who live in the village.
4. Transportations
S E C O N D
P A R A G R A P H
• LIVING IN THE CITY MEANS A LOT OF ACCESSIBLE, CHEAP
TRANSPORTATIONS TO ANYWHERE IN THE CITY (TRAINS, TAXIS, BUSES).
• IN THE VILLAGE, TRANSPORATIONS ARE AS VARIOUS AS THE ONES IN THE
CITY WHILE ALSO BEING REASONABLY-PRICED AND EASILY ACCESSIBLE.
• THEREFORE, IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSPORTATIONS, LIVING IN CITY
IS QUITE SIMILAR TO LIVING THE VILLAGE.
• BOTH IN CITY AND VILLAGE OFFER TRANSPORTATIONS THAT WOULD HELP
PEOPLE GO FROM ONE PLACE TO ANOTHER.
5. CONCLUSION
IN CONCLUSION, BOTH LIVING IN THE CITY AND
LIVING IN THE VILLAGE HAVE GOOD
SIMILARITIES THAT ARE ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE
RESIDENTS AND VISITORS SUCH AS THE
TRANSPORTATIONS. EVEN SO, THERE ARE
SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES, CHIEFLY IN
RELATION TO THE COST OF LIVING. HENCE, IN
THE END IT IS A CHOICE MADE BY PREFERENCE
AS BOTH OFFER DIFFERENT OUTCOMES FOR
THE RESIDENTS.
