The document summarizes the expansion of American settlers into Native American lands between the Mississippi River and the Pacific Ocean in the 1800s, and the conflicts that arose. It describes how both the U.S. and Canadian governments confined indigenous peoples to reservations and tried to assimilate them through education, while the U.S. pursued a more violent policy of war and removal. It discusses several Native American resistance efforts, including the 1862 Sioux war, the Sand Creek Massacre, and the Battle of Little Bighorn in 1876, before concluding that the violence resulted from Native attachment to ancestral lands containing resources desired by settlers.
Housing trends and prospects for marginalized populations in Al Ain City, UAEGalala University
Housing trends and prospects for marginalized populations in Al Ain City, UAE
Abstract
This paper discusses housing trends and prospects of marginalized populations in Al Ain city, United Arab Emirates. Marginalized populations in Al Ain city are workers coming from developing countries looking for better living conditions and high income to support their families. In this rich oil country, they are confronting challenges of scarcity of affordable housing and expensive living conditions. One group lives in slum areas while another group lives in neighboring Buraimi city. Al Ain governmental agencies are trying to solve these problems by building affordable housing for non-citizens.
The aim of this paper is to discuss prospects and possibilities for housing these marginalized populations. Al Ain Town Planning Department provided data, statistics, and surveys prepared by the department. Other information and figures used in this paper were collected by the author through several visits to the sites and interviews with informants.
Housing trends of two groups of workers are discussed in this paper. The first group of marginalized populations, composed mainly of clerical workers, is residing in nearby Buraimi city in the Sultanate of Oman because of the availability of affordable housing dwellings. Many residents of Oman are working in Al Ain city crossing the borders several times daily. This daily migration from one country to another is pausing a serious problem for the government of the UAE, especially in the absence of control check points between the two countries. The second group of marginalized populations is composed of manual workers who are living on city skirts in informal settlements and slums. The informal housing slums occupied by daily foreign workers are a social and health hazard to the rest of the city. The slums are located behind a mountain separating them from the rest of the town. The streets are too narrow for police or ambulance cars to go through them. The residents have their own social network and conflict solving councils. Many of the residents are illegal immigrants and hide in the slums for protection. Incidents of social conflicts occurred between residing groups were very alarming to the rest of the community.
This paper stresses the urgency to recognize the housing needs of marginalized populations in Al Ain city. Gulf countries, with their high income and low populations, depend on less fortunate developing countries for supply of workers and work force. In order to keep a healthy interaction between community groups, housing schemes developed by the government should recognize the needs of all members of the society: permanent and temporary alike. Comprising all social groups in governmental housing programs is a must. The needs of large number of foreigners should be recognized in order to provide healthy and appropriate housing environment for them to live and produce.
Housing trends and prospects for marginalized populations in Al Ain City, UAEGalala University
Housing trends and prospects for marginalized populations in Al Ain City, UAE
Abstract
This paper discusses housing trends and prospects of marginalized populations in Al Ain city, United Arab Emirates. Marginalized populations in Al Ain city are workers coming from developing countries looking for better living conditions and high income to support their families. In this rich oil country, they are confronting challenges of scarcity of affordable housing and expensive living conditions. One group lives in slum areas while another group lives in neighboring Buraimi city. Al Ain governmental agencies are trying to solve these problems by building affordable housing for non-citizens.
The aim of this paper is to discuss prospects and possibilities for housing these marginalized populations. Al Ain Town Planning Department provided data, statistics, and surveys prepared by the department. Other information and figures used in this paper were collected by the author through several visits to the sites and interviews with informants.
Housing trends of two groups of workers are discussed in this paper. The first group of marginalized populations, composed mainly of clerical workers, is residing in nearby Buraimi city in the Sultanate of Oman because of the availability of affordable housing dwellings. Many residents of Oman are working in Al Ain city crossing the borders several times daily. This daily migration from one country to another is pausing a serious problem for the government of the UAE, especially in the absence of control check points between the two countries. The second group of marginalized populations is composed of manual workers who are living on city skirts in informal settlements and slums. The informal housing slums occupied by daily foreign workers are a social and health hazard to the rest of the city. The slums are located behind a mountain separating them from the rest of the town. The streets are too narrow for police or ambulance cars to go through them. The residents have their own social network and conflict solving councils. Many of the residents are illegal immigrants and hide in the slums for protection. Incidents of social conflicts occurred between residing groups were very alarming to the rest of the community.
This paper stresses the urgency to recognize the housing needs of marginalized populations in Al Ain city. Gulf countries, with their high income and low populations, depend on less fortunate developing countries for supply of workers and work force. In order to keep a healthy interaction between community groups, housing schemes developed by the government should recognize the needs of all members of the society: permanent and temporary alike. Comprising all social groups in governmental housing programs is a must. The needs of large number of foreigners should be recognized in order to provide healthy and appropriate housing environment for them to live and produce.
How to make an interactive light display to show how a robot is feelingNeil Winterburn
This presentation is used to support the 'How to create a light display to show a robots emotions' activity developed for FACT's 2016 SLICE project 'Robots Have taken over our school.'It features stimulus images showing how lights are used to display emotion in art and in film and makes connections between robot emotion displays and animal emotion displays. It was created by artist Neil Winterburn & teachers in schools in St.Helens as part of FACT's SLICE project.
FACT is the Liverpool based foundation for art and creative technology. SLICE is the specialist leaders in cultural education program initiated by Curious Minds to support arts organisations to improve their educational offer to schools.
2. Pedro. De la Inconsistencia a la Rocaingtonymtz
La segunda presentación de la serie de El Hacedor de Discípulos y estaremos viendo a Pedro y el gran cambio que forjó el Carácter de este Discípulo de Cristo.
Buka Mata 2017 adalah sebuah kegiatan yang diadakan oleh alumni SMAN 28 Jakarta Angkatan 2016 bekerja sama dengan MPK/PO Parivarta untuk membuka mata dan menambah wawasan siswa-siswi SMAN 28 Jakarta tentang seluk-beluk dunia perkuliahan.
BUKA MATA 2017
“Open your eyes and discover the skies”
#bukamata2017
1. Patricia Fonseca
May 2, 2012
History 141 Course #31136
History of the Americas Since 1800
Professor Arguello
2. Americans flooded the territory between the Mississippi
River and the Pacific Ocean with rapid velocity, creating
farms, ranches, mines, and towns.
It wasn’t long before conflict between the Native
Americans and the settlers grew to alarming standards.
The federal government confined the Native Americans to
small reservations in remote areas that were deemed
useless by the settlers. Many Native Americans refused to
be driven from their ancestral lands and waged war
against federal troops.
The Canadian national government had also taken over
Native Indian lands and were engaged in war with the
Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
Missionaries and educators tried to rid the Native
Americans of their native practices, language, and
religion. They were offered land in exchange for adopting
citizenship and renouncing their tribal rights.
3. The war against Native Americans was much more
violent in the United States than it was in Canada.
National policies supported the settler’s expansion and
the removal of Native Americans. Canada had a small
population, large territories, and less-aggressive
policies against the Native Indians. Canada’s
“Mounties” were concerned with keeping the peace
and establishing a civil government while the U.S.
Calvary approached it as a war for land.
America did not establish social policy for its people of
mixed-race.
Canada recognized its mixed races as distinct people
and established rights accordingly.
Both nations assumed that the Natives had to become
integrated into the society and economic system of
their particular country.
4. Some Natives fled their lands to escape assimilation,
some resorted to warfare, others just embraced the
change and hoped that education would make the
influx of whites easier for the younger generations to
deal with.
With the end of the Mexican War resulting in continued
expansion into New Mexico, Kansas, and Nebraska,
Native Americans were relocated to Oklahoma.
In the summer of 1862, the eastern Sioux waged war
with settlers from their homeland.
By 1864, the Sioux, Pawnees, Cheyennes, and Arapahos
had cleared most settlers from the central plains. This
resulted in retaliation from the Colorado militia. The
Sand Creek Massacre was waged against a peaceful
Indian village.
The Johnson administration established a general peace
commission to end the conflict.
5. October 21, 1867: Leaders of the Kiowas, Kiowa-
Apaches, Arapahos, Cheyennes, and Comanches
signed the Treaty of Medicine Lodge.
The agreement was to remain at peace, surrender
hunting territories, live on the assigned reservations,
while accepting the white man’s instruction in
farming.
Despite the treaties that subsequently followed,
many violent uprisings occurred.
The Plains tribes kept up a pattern of minor raids.
1867: Colonel Custer led a large part of the Seventh
Cavalry Regiment on the banks of Little Bighorn.
The Sioux had gathered a large force of northern
tribes for the battle.
The war ended the following summer as Sitting Bull
and hundreds of his followers fled to Canada.
6. The violence between the Native Americans and the
settlers was due to a number of factors.
The Natives had strong leaders and strong attachment
to their homelands. Most had warrior traditions.
Their lands were well suited for agriculture or roads
and trails.
Minerals desirable to the settlers were found within
the tribal lands.
Many settlers were unhappy with the thought of
letting the Native Americans control and monopolize
these lands.
Many settlers were content with letting the federal
government push the Native Americans off of these
lands to open up the resources.