This document provides an overview of the Common Core State Standards and the transition to Common Core-aligned assessments. It discusses how the Common Core requires higher standards that focus on deeper learning rather than superficial coverage of many topics. It also explains how assessments will change from primarily multiple choice to include more innovative item types like performance tasks and technology-enhanced questions to better measure skills like writing, problem-solving, and analytical thinking. The document provides resources and timelines to help educators understand what is required and plan their transition to meet Common Core requirements by the 2014-2015 deadline.
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for T...Robert Kelly
Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic Officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions, conducted July 15 to October 13, 2015, by Hart Research Associates for the Association of American Colleges and Universities
.
Mike Mullen update on UK Retention, Spring 2011, University Committee on Acad...University of Kentucky
Presentation by Dr. Michael D. Mullen, Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education, University of Kentucky; Spring 2011; to the University Senate committee charged with developing academic planning and priorities - http://www.uky.edu/ucapp/
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for T...Robert Kelly
Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic Officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions, conducted July 15 to October 13, 2015, by Hart Research Associates for the Association of American Colleges and Universities
.
Mike Mullen update on UK Retention, Spring 2011, University Committee on Acad...University of Kentucky
Presentation by Dr. Michael D. Mullen, Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education, University of Kentucky; Spring 2011; to the University Senate committee charged with developing academic planning and priorities - http://www.uky.edu/ucapp/
Falling Short? College Learning and Career SuccessRobert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for the Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 3 to 11, 2014, Hart Research Associates conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 400 employers whose organizations have at least 25 employees and report that 25% or more of their new hires hold either an associate degree from a two-year college or a bachelor’s degree from a four-year college. Respondents are executives at private sector and nonprofit organizations, including owners, CEOs, presidents, C-suite level executives, and vice presidents. The objective of the survey is to understand which learning outcomes employers believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy, how prepared they believe recent college graduates are in these areas, and employers’ feelings about the importance of applied and project-based learning in college.
In addition, from November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey among 613 college students. Respondents included 455 four-year college seniors (304 at public colleges and 151 at private colleges) and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months. This survey explored many of the same topics as the survey of employers in order to provide a comparative perspective among college students. This report highlights selected findings from both the research among employers and the survey of current college students.
The majority of employers continue to say that possessing both field-specific knowledge and a broad range of knowledge and skills is important for recent college graduates to achieve long-term career success. Very few indicate that acquiring knowledge and skills mainly for a specific field or position is the best path for long-term success. Notably, college students recognize the importance of having both breadth and depth of skills and knowledge for their workplace success.
Employers say that when hiring, they place the greatest value on demonstrated proficiency in skills and knowledge that cut across all majors. The learning outcomes they rate as most important include written and oral communication skills, teamwork skills, ethical decision-making, critical thinking, and the ability to apply knowledge in real-world settings. Indeed, most employers say that these cross-cutting skills are more important to an individual’s success at their company than his or her undergraduate major.
However, employers feel that today’s college graduates are not particularly well prepared to achieve the learning outcomes that they view as important. This critique applies to all of the 17 learning outcomes tested, including the cross-cutting skills that employers highly value.
Credit Flexibility Presentation by Sarah LuchsEric Calvert
This slide set was presented by Sarah Luchs of the Ohio Department of Education in a session for the Southern Ohio Educational Service Center in March, 2010.
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
Aligned Teaching Resources: Benchmarking Implementation of College- and Caree...SREB
SREB report: How have state departments of education fostered local educators’ use of high-quality instructional resources that are aligned to their state’s new college- and career-readiness standards?
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes AssessmentRobert Kelly
Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions, conducted July 15 to October 13, 2015,
by Hart Research Associates for the Association of American Colleges and Universities
A presentation to the Board of Higher Education at their meeting on April 28, 2015 by:
- Dr. Carlos Santiago, Senior Deputy Commissioner for Academic Affairs at the Department of Higher Education
- Dr. Leslie Bolinger Horton, Dean of School of Math & Science at Quinsigamond Community College
- Dr. Maura Mast, Associate Vice Provost of Undergraduate Studies at UMass Boston
- Dr. Karin Vorwerk, Professor and Chair of the Department of Mathematics at Westfield State University
Accountability: Benchmarking Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness ...SREB
SREB report: What measures have states put in place to hold schools accountable for teaching and learning under their new college-and career-readiness standards?
Falling Short? College Learning and Career SuccessRobert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for the Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 3 to 11, 2014, Hart Research Associates conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 400 employers whose organizations have at least 25 employees and report that 25% or more of their new hires hold either an associate degree from a two-year college or a bachelor’s degree from a four-year college. Respondents are executives at private sector and nonprofit organizations, including owners, CEOs, presidents, C-suite level executives, and vice presidents. The objective of the survey is to understand which learning outcomes employers believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy, how prepared they believe recent college graduates are in these areas, and employers’ feelings about the importance of applied and project-based learning in college.
In addition, from November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey among 613 college students. Respondents included 455 four-year college seniors (304 at public colleges and 151 at private colleges) and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months. This survey explored many of the same topics as the survey of employers in order to provide a comparative perspective among college students. This report highlights selected findings from both the research among employers and the survey of current college students.
The majority of employers continue to say that possessing both field-specific knowledge and a broad range of knowledge and skills is important for recent college graduates to achieve long-term career success. Very few indicate that acquiring knowledge and skills mainly for a specific field or position is the best path for long-term success. Notably, college students recognize the importance of having both breadth and depth of skills and knowledge for their workplace success.
Employers say that when hiring, they place the greatest value on demonstrated proficiency in skills and knowledge that cut across all majors. The learning outcomes they rate as most important include written and oral communication skills, teamwork skills, ethical decision-making, critical thinking, and the ability to apply knowledge in real-world settings. Indeed, most employers say that these cross-cutting skills are more important to an individual’s success at their company than his or her undergraduate major.
However, employers feel that today’s college graduates are not particularly well prepared to achieve the learning outcomes that they view as important. This critique applies to all of the 17 learning outcomes tested, including the cross-cutting skills that employers highly value.
Credit Flexibility Presentation by Sarah LuchsEric Calvert
This slide set was presented by Sarah Luchs of the Ohio Department of Education in a session for the Southern Ohio Educational Service Center in March, 2010.
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
Aligned Teaching Resources: Benchmarking Implementation of College- and Caree...SREB
SREB report: How have state departments of education fostered local educators’ use of high-quality instructional resources that are aligned to their state’s new college- and career-readiness standards?
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes AssessmentRobert Kelly
Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U member institutions, conducted July 15 to October 13, 2015,
by Hart Research Associates for the Association of American Colleges and Universities
A presentation to the Board of Higher Education at their meeting on April 28, 2015 by:
- Dr. Carlos Santiago, Senior Deputy Commissioner for Academic Affairs at the Department of Higher Education
- Dr. Leslie Bolinger Horton, Dean of School of Math & Science at Quinsigamond Community College
- Dr. Maura Mast, Associate Vice Provost of Undergraduate Studies at UMass Boston
- Dr. Karin Vorwerk, Professor and Chair of the Department of Mathematics at Westfield State University
Accountability: Benchmarking Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness ...SREB
SREB report: What measures have states put in place to hold schools accountable for teaching and learning under their new college-and career-readiness standards?
10 Things You Should Know About the Common Corene atoday.o.docxpaynetawnya
10 Things You Should Know About the Common Core
ne atoday.org /2013/10/16/10-things-you-should-know-about-the-common-core/
October 16, 2013 by twalker
Filed under ,
By Tim Walker
An enormous effort to implement the Common Core State
Standards (CCSS) is underway in more than 40 states and the
District of Columbia. Districts are training staff, field-testing
assessments, and evaluating technology requirements.
Teachers are rewriting curriculum and instruction to prepare
students for more rigorous coursework. Some states are further
ahead than others. And as the 2014 – 2015 implementation
deadline draws near, it’s likely that the road has been—and will
continue to be—a bit rocky. But schools are forging ahead with
the initiative—even as it faces opponents who are determined to
mislabel the effort as everything from “Obamacore” to a
“national curriculum.” The Common Core is a set of voluntary
K–12 standards in English language arts/literacy and
mathematics. The White House did not create the initiative, nor is it leading it. The standards were developed by
governors and state school officials, with input from a wide range of educators, content experts, national
organizations (including NEA), and community groups.
The challenges surrounding implementation, however, are formidable. Teachers are concerned about adapting
their classrooms to the rigorous new standards and receiving the proper training. Many are also wondering about
the role of new assessments. But they also recognize the enormous opportunity that lies ahead.
“Educators desperately want to reclaim the joy in teaching—which means creative lesson plans, meaningful
exploration of topics, and inspiring the joy of real learning in our students,” says NEA President Dennis Van Roekel.
“Common Core could help achieve that if the implementation is done correctly.”
To reach that goal, all stakeholders must work together and take a leadership role in educating each other and the
general public about the Common Core. It’s a complex subject. The following facts are intended to clarify key
points, allay concerns about what the Common Core isn’t, and—most importantly—highlight how the standards
can be the game -change r stude nts ne e d.
1. M ost NEA M e mbe rs Support the Common Core
Are many teachers anxious about the Common Core? Absolutely. Are some die-hard
critics? No doubt. But there is no massive groundswell of opposition to the Common
Core among NEA members. An NEA poll conducte d in July by Gre e nbe rg Quinlan
Rosne r Re se arch found that 75 percent of its members—teachers and education
support professionals —supported the standards outright or supported “with
reservations.” Whether it’s tighter content focus or opportunities for deeper critical
thinking, the majority of teachers see the new standards as something to get excited
about. Another poll released by the American Federation of Teachers revealed similar
levels of enthusiasm, again i ...
Chapter 5Understanding the Standards And I’m calling.docxjoyjonna282
Chapter 5
Understanding the Standards
And I’m calling
on our nation’s
governors and state
education chiefs to
develop standards
and assessments
that don’t simply
measure whether
students can fill
in a bubble on a
test, but whether
they possess 21st
century skills like
problem solving and
critical thinking and
entrepreneurship
and creativity.
—Barack Obama,
March 1, 2009
Learning Outcomes
By the end of the chapter, you will be able to:
• Explain the development of the Common Core standards movement.
•Describe the basic elements of the Common Core English language arts standards.
•Discuss the basic elements of the Common Core mathematics standards.
•Recall the basic elements of the Next Generation Science Standards and the National
Educational Technology Standards.
•Analyze how differentiated instruction applies to the newly emerging standards and the
technology standards for students.
5
iStockphoto/Thinkstock
Pre-Test Chapter 5
Introduction
Differentiated instruction is built on a foundation of effective teaching practices. Quality cur-
riculum is one of these defining principles, as what is taught serves as the basis for how it is
taught. Quality curriculum has its basis in standards, or descriptions of student outcomes in
content areas. The standards in the United States are undergoing major changes with the adop-
tion of the Common Core State Standards and new standards in science and social studies.
Initially developed by a consortium of state governors and state superintendents of instruction,
they have been vetted by professional groups, state and local education representatives, and
parents within each state.
These standards mark a departure from past practices, which is good news for differentiated
instruction. States had previously been responsible for developing their own standards, and
the creation of assessment systems based on those standards immediately followed. While this
approach assured an articulation between standards and assessment, there were unintended
consequences. The effect was a narrowing of the curriculum. In practice, the assessment sys-
tems began to drive the curriculum and often resulted in teaching methods that were drill
based, had low cognitive demand, used bubble-in-the-answer assessments, and relied on a
stand-and-deliver means of presenting content. (Kendall, 2011). The new standards aim to rec-
tify that approach. They describe student outcomes in terms of college and career readiness,
and encourage increasingly complex cognitive tasks throughout the K-12 experience. Moreover,
the manner in which they were written and adopted has encouraged districts and teachers to
develop curriculum first, rather than waiting until an assessment system is in place (Kendall,
2011). Since their release, the authors of the standards have vetted a number of resources that
assist teachers, parents, and community members in understanding and planning for imple-
mentation ...
On May 1st, the Center for Innovative School Facilities hosted a group workshop led by Adam Rubin of New Visions for Public Schools. Adam led a discussion focusing on education reform and how it is driving the design, construction, and community and administrative infrastructure of school facilities.
The phrase "teaching to the test" commonly means the practice of using a state-mandated test as a guide in deciding what to teach and how to teach it. However, this simple definition understates the complexity of the issue. On one hand, teaching to the test can be a case of the tail wagging the dog, where the needs of the test becomes more important than the teaching. It can even indicate an attempt to subvert the testing process, to beat the system. But seen in a positive light, teaching to the test can describe purposeful efforts to teach students knowledge and skills that have been established as important and included in mandated standards and assessments.
Why has this become an important issue?
Almost every state now has mandated tests for students. More and more, test scores are used for accountability-to make decisions about school accreditation, staff job security or pay, and student promotion and graduation. As the tests have became more high-stakes, the practice of teaching to the test has also increased dramatically. School personnel want their students to succeed and show what they know on the tests, and they often feel pressure to use any means available to raise scores. However, while families and the general public are demanding higher standards and higher scores, there is increasing concern, sometimes very vocally expressed, that the time and effort spent teaching to the test is educationally shortchanging students.
What's wrong with teaching to tests?
There's nothing wrong with teaching the general content and skills included on a test, as long as the test is assessing the "right" things and asking students to demonstrate their knowledge in ways that parallel real-world applications. The problem often develops when a test does not match standards for what students should know and be able to do, covers a very narrow set of objectives from the broader base of knowledge and skills included in standards, or includes mostly items that focus on recall of isolated facts. In cases such as these, both experts and practicing educators fear that teaching to the test may:
- narrow or distort the curriculum;
- emphasize use of short-term over long-term memory;
- discourage creative thinking;
When is teaching to the test appropriate?
In general, the better the test, the more it can be used as a guide for good instruction. There is much less controversy about teaching to the test when the test itself:
- reflects solid content standards;
- assesses a broad range of knowledge and skills;
How can we teach to the test the right way?
- Legitimate teaching to the test is not instruction targeted at specific items that will appear on the test, or that appeared on last year's version. Instruction can, however, appropriately be targeted to the general content and skills that will be assessed.
Source: https://ebookschoice.com/teaching-to-the-test/
Running Head Target of Program Evaluation Plan, Part 11TARG.docxtoltonkendal
Running Head: Target of Program Evaluation Plan, Part 1
1
TARGET OF PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
6
Shamika Cockfield
Strayer University
Dr. Melanie Gallman
EDU571: Evaluating School Programs
January 19, 2017
Teacher Preparation Program
The evaluation of an education program is an evolving profession. The purpose of testing the efficiency of a program is to give the decision-makers substantial information to use in enhancing or improving the recommended program. For example, an institution, say a school, may use program evaluation to assist in making decisions regarding whether to establish a program (needs assessment), ways of developing a program (formative evaluation) and whether to revise or continue using the existing program (summative evaluation) (Faxon-Mills, Hamilton, Rudnick & Stecher, 2013). As such, the objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficiency of a teacher preparation program in enhancing the value of the teachers and the performance of the students.
Describe three (3) elements of a worthy object for program evaluation - its type, the department administrating it, and target population.
The program evaluation under perspective is the Teacher Preparation program. It is a program that the three levels of government, Federal, State and local government establishes to ascertain the efficiency of the teachers engaged in educational institutions at all the levels ranging from the Pre-school to the University Levels. As such, the program falls under or it’s rather administered by the Council for the Accreditation of Education Programs (CAEP). The target focuses mostly on the teacher candidates (Faxon-Mills, Hamilton, Rudnick & Stecher, 2013).
Describe the program's history, primary purpose(s), and / or expected outcomes.
Effective tutoring has always been significant and is recently a nationwide concern. The increased emphasis on effective tutoring can be attributed to a several factors, such as (a) long-lasting accomplishment gaps that endure in spite of the comprehensive transitions at both the national and State levels, (b) the poorer academic performance registered by the students on international examination compared to their counterparts living in other industrialized nations and lastly(c) the need of managing the expenditure by the government at the Federal, State and local positions. All these aspects have raised a major concern concerning the efficiency of the teachers in schools and the significance of preparing teachers adequately while in colleges and campuses. Furthermore, the emphasis on enhancing teacher education is as well triggered by the competition and assessment with the alternate certification programs and the fresh standards recommended by the Board mandated to accredit the education preparation programs.
The board requires these programs to illustrate that the approved candidates can impact strong positive impacts on the students learning. One key outcome of these developments is the level o ...
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
1. CTB Smart Center eGuide Series
Common Core State Standards
Getting from Here to Core
How to launch the program that launches students.
A Common Core
2. This e-guide was written
to help you transition to Common Core State Standards
(CCSS) and prepare students to compete and succeed
in college and the workplace. Every major change—
in education or any other endeavor—begins with a level
of uncertainty and right now, in the planning stages,
getting ready for the 2014-15 deadline may seem like a
daunting task.
This document will give you a more concrete grasp on
the changes ahead and help you take the necessary
steps to move forward with confidence. It also provides
links to some of the best resources available to help you
get started.
Table of Contents
This e-guide was written
to help you transition to Common Core
Raising the bar on education pg. 3
Common Core State Standards updates pg. 4
What’s different in Common Core? pg. 6
Backmappinginstead of hopscotching pg. 7
Getting Ready for Common Core assessments pg. 10
How Common Core-aligned assessments
Sample Item- ELA pg. 15
Sample Item- mathematics pg. 24
Evaluating your assessment options pg. 28
Common Core State Standards solutions
How will you get from here to Core? pg. 34
Planning your journey pg. 35
Place yourself on the timeline pg. 37
will be different pg. 12
from CTB/McGraw-Hill pg. 29
3. 3
In 2010, two Common Core consortia were formed. These consortia
were sponsored by the National Governor’s Association and funded by
Race to the Top funds. These consortia support all participating states in
the measurement progress made towards Common Core State Stan-
dards. They are funded only through 2014 to help states write
core-aligned test items and create standardized tests to measure
performance. States have the option to use consortia-published tests,
contract with an educational partner who develops core-ready
assessments, or craft their own tests from scratch.
In addition to the information available on the consortia’s websites,
individual states are openly sharing their resources, educational
partners like CTB-McGraw/Hill have developed online resources
(CTB.com/CommonCore), and many others are being added daily.
33
Here are some links to help you get started:
www.k12.wa.us/smarter/
www.corestandards.org/voices-of-support
Learn more about the Common Core Standards Initiative:
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers
(PAARC):
www.parcconline.org/
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC)
www.smarterbalanced.org
Myths v. Facts About the Common Core Standards:
www.corestandards.org/assets/CoreFacts.pdf
www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/
policy/CommonCoreStds.pdf
Common Core State Standards
Raising the bar on education.
4. 4
Guam
Northern Mariana Islands
Puerto Rico
U.S.Virgin Islands
District of Columbia
American Samoa Islands
Common Core State Standards update
Where does your state stand
in terms of readiness?
As of early 2012, all but one of the 47 states that have adopted
Common Core State Standards reported that they had developed
transition plans. Most had also begun to align their systems to the new
standards, provided some professional development to teachers (45
states), begun to develop instructional materials (35 states) and revised
their teacher evaluation processes (38 states).
Seven states have fully-developed implementation plans in place for
each of the three major transitional planning areas: professional
development, curriculum materials, and teacher evaluations.
Adopted
doptedNotYet Ad
As of August 30, 2012, all but four states have elected to adopt
Common Core State Standards (CCSS). In the process, they have
adopted the assessment system and curriculum of one of two con-
sortia (or both): the Smarter Balanced Consortium (SBAC) and Partner-
ship for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARRC).
Now, the states are tasked with developing their transitional plans—
three-part plans they can present to their school districts that will make
it possible to “trickle down” their commitment to the individual schools,
teachers, and students.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) is a joint
project of the National Governors Association (NGA) and
the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) to develop
common K–12 reading and math standards designed to
prepare students for college and their careers.
* Education First and the EPE Research Center, “Preparing for Change: A National Perspective on Common
Core State Standards Implementation Planning” (Seattle, WA: Education First; Bethesda, MD: EPE Research
Center, January 2012
5. 5
Common Core launches in 2014-2015
As of the 2014-2015 school year, current state tests will be replaced by
one of two exams that will be taken by students in states that have
voluntarily chosen to participate. These exams will evaluate students
against a new set of standards that will be higher and more rigorous
than previous standards.
The standards will:
(1) foster higher achievement of U.S. students;
(2) allow U.S. students to compete better with students
around the world;
(3) make educational opportunity more equal.
The standards have a style and organizational structure that require
different teaching methods than the past. Rather than teaching a little
about a lot of subjects, the Common Core encourages deeper learning
about fewer subjects, giving students more complete understanding of
the principles behind concepts and a solid foundation for future learning.
Testing against these standards requires students to demonstrate greater
depths of knowledge, use technology in their answers, and justify their
conclusions, not just pick a letter from a list of multiple choice questions.
The Common Core State Standards are based on different theories
(reading comprehension, writing, differentiated instruction) than past
standards, so they are qualitatively different in many ways.
In the past, many students left high school
unprepared to succeed at entry-level college
courses and/or lacking the skills to successfully
land and keep a job. Every state set their own
quality standards for achievement, resulting in
large variations in proficiency as measured by
the National Assessment of Education Progress
scores.
Common Core State Standards specify K–12
expectations for college and career readiness
to assure all high school graduates are ready to
succeed in their careers and lives. Educators in
every participating state have agreed to adopt
common guidelines for what students need to
know and be able to do by the time they graduate.
6. 6
No more teaching to the test.
The Common Core State Standards prepare students for college and/
or the workplace. There is no mandated curriculum, and it is up to the
individual states, districts, schools, and teachers to develop the cur-
ricula to elevate student knowledge to match the standards they have
adopted. This provides a great degree of freedom at the local level to
teach in ways that meet the needs of students and educators alike.
Existing curricula will need to be replaced with new plans, aligned to
the new standards. All standard tests will need to be replaced, as well.
Teacher preparation and textbook design will follow suit, as they are
currently, in large part, inconsistent with those supporting the
Common Core.
What’s different in Common Core?
Tools and data
educators need
to improve
teaching and
learning
Resources
for
Formative
Assessment
Practices
to improve instruction
Flexible, open
Interim
p
Assessment
used for actionable
feedback
Summative
Assessments
Benchmarked to
college and career
readiness
g
To help teachers and students adjust to new ways of teaching
and learning, educational partners like CTB-McGraw/Hill have
developed sample test items and a selection of benchmark,
formative, and summative assessments ready to use in the
classroom right now.
7. 7
In the past, standards have started with the simplest bits of information
about a given subject at the Kindergarten level and built upon those skills
and concepts as appropriate for each grade. The result was disconnected
shallow learning, punctuated by numerous knowledge gaps, which left
students without a true understanding of the subject area.
Common Core State Standards begin with what a student needs to
know for college or career readiness and backmaps from there, taking
care that all the fundamentals necessary for in-depth comprehension
are covered in sequence. Backmapping holds teachers accountable,
making sure that every student demonstrates progressively deeper
learning on a given subject, and can back up this knowledge with
in-depth valid explanations.
Backmapping instead of hopscotching
In essence, backmapping, as used in the Common Core, pulls students
steadily forward towards success in college and career (instead of loading
their brains with random facts). In the process, students become
immersed in subject matter and explore real-life scenarios around the
subject, which awakens curiosity and gives them new, relevant reasons
to love school.
7
8. 8
How do Common Core items show a progression of learning?
Backmapping (English Language Arts Example)
STRANDS
ANCHOR STANDARDS
CATEGORY
STANDARDS
READING WRITING LISTENING/SPEAKINGLANGUAGE
SPECIFIC COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS ANCHOR STANDARDS
KEY IDEAS AND DETAILS
STANDARDS (6-10)
Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, visually and
quantitatively, as well as in words.
College & Career Ready
Analyze multiple interpretations of a story, drama, or poem (e.g., recorded or live production
of a play or recorded novel or poetry), evaluating how each version interprets the source text.
(Include at least one play by Shakespeare and one play by an American dramatist.)
Grades 11–12
Analyze the extent to which a filmed or live production of a story or drama stays faithful to
or departs from the text or script, evaluating the choices made by the director or actors.
Grades 7–8
Make connections between the text of a story or drama and a visual or oral presentation of
the text, identifying where each version reflects specific descriptions and directions in the text.
Grade 4
With prompting and support, describe the relationship between illustrations and the story
in which they appear (e.g., what moment in a story an illustration depicts).
Kindergarten
9. 9
Unlike the largely random organization of past standards, the
Common Core standards are based on a coordinated structure that
follows a logical, evidence-based progression towards mastery. This is
a major difference that will be highlighted in professional development
coursework. Instead of teaching a diverse list of facts and/or discrete
skills, today’s teachers will need to understand and teach in a way that
integrates comprehension, oral language, and writing.
For example, the Common Core State Standards for ELA are grouped
across four strands: Reading,Writing,Listening&Speaking,andLanguage.
The standards within a strand are intended to be coordinated and to
support each other, not to be taught in isolation. The standards across
the four strands are also intended to be heavily integrated in instruction
and assessment.
Higher standards, harder to reach
The Common Core State Standards require higher levels of rigor in
ELA and math learning than ever before. States, districts, and schools
who do not start early to develop new core-aligned curricula, provide
teacher instruction, pre-test students, and take advantage of the rich
resources available to them, will likely be in for an unpleasant surprise
when end-of-year testing rolls around.
Integration instead of disconnection
COMMON CORE
PERFORMANCE TASK
ITEM SCHEMATIC
ANSWER
5-6 AdditionalItems
2-3 Items
Anchor Text /Story
Discussion
Evidence-BasedResponse
10. 10
We’ve seen how the new standards will be more stringent, that new
skills will need to be learned (by teachers and students alike), that
in-depth subject mastery will be required, and all of this will be tested
at the end of the year.
Common Core State Standards put every administrator, every teacher,
every student, and every parent on the same page. Although there is
plenty of flexibility to allow the teaching and testing of other subject
matter in the classroom, from school to school, and state to state,
testing will compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges.
The Common Core provides a consistent, clear understanding of what
students are expected to learn, so that teachers and parents know what
they need to do to help them as they progress in their preparation
for college and careers. How will they know how well they are doing?
Through the use of Common Core-aligned assessments.
Your consortium is in the process of developing a library of assessments
that includes interim/benchmark, formative, performance, summative,
and through-course.
Getting ready for Common Core assessments
Interim/benchmark assessments give school- and district-level
administrators rapid access to student data that can be aggregated
or disaggregated at any level. This reveals trends and patterns in student
performance, identifies best practices, or signals the need for additional
resources to specific content areas, grade levels, or student groups.
Formative assessments are as much for the teachers as for the
students. Given during instruction, or immediately following the
presentation of a key concept, they give educators critical information
about student and classroom progress and uncover opportunities for
further review, suggest adjustments to the teacher’s approach, and
make sure a subject has been mastered before moving on.
Performance assessments are innovative new assessments based on
tasks students are asked to perform to demonstrate their understanding
and procedural skills relative to the content. More constructed response
than multiple choice items, they are scored using rubrics relevant to the
skills being assessed.
Summative assessments summarize learning over time, measuring
student achievement, and providing detailed reports educators can use
to show academic progress. They also compare growth across various
groups and jurisdictions and provide proof that progress towards
Common Core Standards is being made.
Through-course assessments provide continuous feedback to
teachers throughout the year.
11. 11
Domains and concepts for mathematics by gradeDOMAINS
Fractions
GRADE K
Counting &
Cardinality
Ratios & Proportional
Relationships
Functions Functions
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
HS Conceptual
Categories
Operations and Algebraic Thinking Expression and Equations
The Number System Number & Quantity
Statistics & Probability Statistics & Probability
Algebra
Number and Operations in Base Ten
Measurement and Data
Geometry Geometry Geometry
DOMAINS
The Real Number
System
The Complex Number
System
Vector & Matrix
Quantities
Seeing Structure
in Expressions
Reasoning with
Equations & Inequalities
Interpreting
Functions
Linear, Quadratic &
Exponential Models
Trigonometric
Functions
Geometric Measurement
& Dimension
Creating Equations
Expressing Geometric
Properties with
Equations
Interpreting Categorical
& Quantitative Data
Conditional Probability &
the Rules of Probability
Using Probability
to Make Decisions
Number & Quantity Algebra Functions Geometry Statistic & Probability
Conceptual
Category
Quantities
Arithmetic with
Polynomials &
Rational Expressions
Similarity, Right Triangles
& Trigonometry
Making Inferences &
Justifying Conclusions
Building
Functions
Congruence
In K–8 (Kindergarten, Elementary, and Middle School), each grade contains work on several domains, as described in the table below. For example:
In Grade 1, the content includes Operations and Algebraic Thinking, Number and Operations in Base Ten, Measurement and Data, and Geometry.
In High School, the standards are arranged in conceptual categories, such as Algebra or Functions. In each conceptual category
there are domains, such as Creating Equations and Interpreting Functions.
12. 12
How Common Core aligned assessments will be different
Assessments that measure student achievement and progress on the
Common Core will require new thinking, new technologies, new approach-
es to content, and new ways to analyze data and report assessment
results. One big change you’ll notice is the shift from basic factual knowl-
edge to an increased emphasis on performance. These next generation
assessments, as envisioned by the two assessment consortia, must address
a new set of design considerations and criteria.
Innovative Item Types:
Common Core assessments will include performance tasks, technology-
enhanced items, and constructed-response items in addition to the
traditional multiple-choice items to measure the depth, rigor, and
complexity of comprehension required by the Common Core.
Performance tasks help uncover deeper levels of student
understanding by measuring a student’s ability to think
through a complex problem that may have more than one
correct answer.
They call for students to apply their knowledge within an
authentic learning experience, which may take anywhere from
minutes to days to complete. These items will be scored using
rubrics based on the cognitive skills being assessed.
Technology-enhanced items and assessments provide
instant feedback to students and teachers, making it possible
to quickly fill learning gaps and support students in moving
steadily towards achievement. They reduce the turnaround
time for student reports, save instruction time, and ultimately
preserve resources.
Extended constructed-response items allow educators
to measure skills that are difficult to assess with traditional
multiple-choice items. This could include writing an essay or
answering an open-ended question in English language arts or
mathematics.
Writing items require students to write logical arguments
based on substantive claims, sound reasoning, and relevant
evidence. Emphasis on writing skills helps students improve
their essay-writing skills and prepare for state and national
writing assessments.
✓
✓
✓
✓
13. 13
Informative Reports:
Common Core assessment reports must provide teachers and administrators
with useful, actionable interim/benchmark or summative information that
links student performance to college- and career-readiness benchmarks.
Challenging Cognitive Tasks:
Common Core assessments must include items that provide evidence
of robust student thinking about important content.
Rigorous Validity and Reliability:
Common Core assessments must be engineered and developed to support
appropriate and instructionally-meaningful uses of data.
Further, the assessments must be research-based and incorporate learning
progressions and clearly defined cognitive tasks. Online delivery in a
computer adaptive environment is also a priority.
ELA assessments under Common Core
The new standards for ELA specify that all students engage with increasingly
complex texts, appropriate for their grade level.
• Literacy standards are more stringent, requiring a rich mix of literacy texts,
informational texts, history/social studies texts, and science and technical texts.
• Close reading of texts is required, challenging students to uncover the meaning
behind the text and finding evidence to support their analysis.
• Talking and writing about texts is required to boost comprehension and develop
writing skills. Three writing types are emphasized: opinion/argument, explanatory/
informational, and narrative writing. The CCSS place greater emphasis on argument
and informational writing thanpast frameworks have, especially at the upper grades.
• A heavier emphasis on technology requires students to interact
with digital text and international resources.
o interact
14. 14
A performance task will have multiple parts; for example,
an ELA item may include some or all of these parts::
• Discussion questions
• Anchor text
• 2-3 additional, related texts, which may include multimedia
• 5-6 additional items based on anchor and related texts,
which may be technology enhanced
• Culminating product, which may be an essay, presentation,
or argument
New item types– performance tasks have multiple parts
15. 15
The American Red Cross helps people of all countries, backgrounds, and ages—
including yours! I started volunteering at the American Red Cross in Cleveland,
Ohio, in 1999, when I was 17 years old. I was in charge of a program that teaches less
fortunate people how to find jobs, save money, and find a place to live. Now I’m in
college in Washington, D.C., but I still help out whenever I come home.
What can you do to help? Your local chapter will know. Most give classes to
kids your age and older. First-aid and basic-aid classes teach you how to respond to
small emergencies, lead a healthy life, and keep bigger emergencies from happening.
Whale Tales is a class that teaches water safety. When you are 11, you can also take
baby-sitting or beginning lifeguard classes. One day, you might save someone’s life.
Most kids don’t actually volunteer with the Red Cross until they are 12.
Zerrine Sethna at the Cleveland Red Cross chapter tells kids to find or even create
the perfect activity for themselves. You could wrap presents for less fortunate kids
during the holidays. Perhaps you would want to plant flowers around your city or
Red Cross building. Maybe you could help to mail letters. You could even wash the
“disaster vans.” These vans help people who have been through a fire, tornado, or other
emergency. When you’re 15, you can teach classes to other kids.
If you like these ideas or have one of your own, like I did, have a parent or teacher
help you to get in touch with your local chapter. “What’s important is having kids do
things that relate to what we do at the Red Cross,” Sethna says. You have lots of ways
you can help people. Find what’s right for you!
Get Involved, Be a Volunteer
by Laura K. Meissner
Directions
Read the article and the story about volunteering. Then do Numbers 1–4.
The two texts, one an informational text and the
other a literary short story, share a common theme:
the rewards of volunteering. While the texts are of
moderate complexity, students will be challenged
to make connections between the two.
Sample ELA Item– Performance Task, Text and Story English Language Arts, Grade 4
16. 16
“We’re flying to Hawaii for our summer vacation,” Peter said. “I’m going to go
scuba diving there.”
“We’re staying at a ranch in Montana,” Mateo told everyone. “I’m going to ride
horses all day long.”
“My family is visiting Disney World,” Stefan said. “And I plan to go on every ride
twice.” Stefan turned to Tim. “Where is your family going on vacation this year, Tim?”
“We’re driving to a town about 100 miles from here,” Tim answered. “Then we’re
going to build a house for a family who lives there.”
“What?” Peter asked.
“That doesn’t sound like a fun vacation,” Mateo said.
“It sounds like work to me,” Stefan added. Tim shrugged. He didn’t know how to
explain this trip to his friends. It had sounded okay when his parents had told him about
the plan. But he had to admit that it seemed kind of strange when he told his friends
about it. “We’re going with a group that builds houses for families who don’t have any,”
Tim tried to explain. “Like maybe they had a fire, flood, or something that destroyed
their old house. So this group goes and builds a new house for them.”
“Well, try to have fun,” Peter said.
“If you can,” Stefan told Tim.
“Yeah, see you guys in August,” Mateo said.
Tim waved to his friends as they all left the park, each riding his
bike home in a different direction.
The day his family finished packing the RV, Tim still didn’t quite know how he felt
about the trip. Maybe his friends were right, and this vacation wouldn’t be fun at all.
He wished his parents would take him to Hawaii or Disney World instead.
But as soon as the RV pulled up to the building site and Tim’s family tumbled out
joining the group already there, Tim forgot about his doubts. He ended up being too
busy to think about them.
Tim’s Vacation
by Heather Klassen
noow how to
oold him about
iis friends
’tt have any,”
ddestroyed
oow how he felt
fufun at all.
dd.
The days went by in a blur of building. Along with his father, mother,
and older sister, Tim helped put up the walls, floors, and even the roof of the
new house.
He had lots of fun working with everyone, including the family who would
be living in the house. It was fun talking and singing all day long and playing
with the other kids in the evening. By the end of the day, he fell exhausted
onto his bunk.
Suddenly the last day of the project arrived. Tim’s father called him over
so he could press his handprints into the still wet cement of the new patio. As
he wiped the cement from his hands, Tim gazed at the completed house.
I’ll have to tell my friends that this turned out to be a great vacation after
all, Tim decided. I did have a lot of fun, even though I worked hard too. But
the best
part is that a whole family will live in a house that I helped to build!
Sample ELA Item– Performance Task, Text and Story English Language Arts, Grade 4
17. 17
1. Which detail from the article best supports the idea that the Red Cross offers
many different ways for people to help others?
A Red Cross volunteers are usually 12 years of age or more.
B Red Cross volunteers serve in emergencies, mail letters, and more.
C The Red Cross provides training to people who apply to be volunteers.
D The Red Cross has chapters with volunteers in many different countries.
Foundational to the Reading Standards of the Common Core
State Standards (CCSS) is the requirement that students be
able to identify explicit and implicit details that support key
ideas in a text (RI.4.1). For this item, students identify a text
detail that supportsastatedkeyideaofaninformationaltext.
Fromthisitemaninferencecanbemadeabout a student’s ability
to connect one of a text’s main points with a supporting
detail.
2. Read these sentences from the story “Tim’s Vacation.”
“We’re going with a group that builds houses for families who don’t have any,”
Tim tried to explain. “Like maybe they had a fire, flood, or something that
destroyed their old house. So this group goes and builds a new house for them. ”
According to the information in “Get Involved, Be a Volunteer,” how do Red Cross
volunteers help people in the same situation that Tim describes?
A They send disaster vans to the area.
B They help people find jobs in a new place.
C They teach babysitting classes to young people.
D They wrap presents for people during the holidays.
This item illustrates how students must make direct
connections between two related texts in order to
demonstrate their proficiency at integrating knowledge
and ideas (RL.4.9). Given a short excerpt from the story,
students must refer back to the informational text to find
an idea related to the excerpt. While all four answer choices
are details from the text, only one clearly relates to the idea
present in the story’s excerpt. This item moves beyond
identification and drawing simple conclusions to analysis
and evaluation.
Sample ELA Item– Performance Task Part 2 English Language Arts, Grade 4
18. 18
3. If the story “Tim’s Vacation” were written as a poem, how would it be different?
Use the information in the chart below to help you list one characteristic of a
fictional story and two characteristics of a poem.
Being able to understand characteristics of genres and how
authors use those characteristics to create meaning is a
hallmark of a critical reader. This item tests students’
understanding of the characteristics of poems and stories
(RL.4.5). Students must complete a chart that lists genre
characteristics as they relate to the story about Tim’s
vacation. The chart is partially complete in order to direct
and scaffold students’ responses; to complete the chart,
students will need to “refer to the structural elements of
poems” as required by the standard. Being able to do so
is the foundation for analysis of more complex texts and
of genres at the upper grades.
Characteristics of a
fictional story
Has a plot
Organized into paragraphs
Characteristics of
a poem
Uses rhythm
Sample ELA Item– Performance Task Part 3 English Language Arts, Grade 4
19. 19
4. PART A
Which of these best describes the structure of the article, “Get Involved,
Be a Volunteer”?
A It describes a problem and explains how Red Cross volunteers can help solve it.
B It describes the activities available to people who become Red Cross volunteers.
C It uses real-life examples to compare what is good and what is bad about
volunteering for the Red Cross.
D It tells the step-by-step story of how a teenager stopped volunteering at the
Red Cross so she could go to college.
PART B
How does the author show the importance of volunteering in the article
“Get Involved, Be a Volunteer”?
A by describing her own experience
B by listing the different available classes
C by describing the best way to get involved
D by listing activities for different age groups
This PT uses the same texts as those of the previous
items but most likely would not appear in the same test
as the previous items.
The PT begins with two orienting selected-response
items that require students to focus on the informa-
tional text and examine how the author structures the
text (RI.4.5) and develops the text’s main points (RI.4.8).
To do so, students must read and evaluate the full text
carefully. These introductory components of the
PT also push students to re-read and re-examine the
text, better preparing them for the components that
follow.
The next set of items presents one approach to a performance task (PT) in which students are guided through a series of smaller tasks, or components, that
provide a scaffolded, cognitive journey through two related texts. The targeted constructs for this PT cross Reading Literature, Reading Informational Text,
Writing, and Language strands of the CCSS.
Sample ELA Item– Performance Task Parts 4A and B English Language Arts, Grade 4
20. 20
PART C
In the story, Tim learns a lesson about volunteering. Each of the three boxes below
has a question about Tim’s experience. For each box, find a detail from the story that
answers the question and write it in that box.
How does Tim feel about his family’s vacation plans at the beginning of the story?
How do Tim’s feelings change after he starts helping to build the house?
How does Tim feel about his vacation at the end of the story?
In this component students now focus on the literary
text, a short fictional story. Students must purposefully
select details about how the main character’s feelings
change in the course of the story (RL.4.1) and write
those details in the appropriate boxes. This type of con-
structed–response item often requires greater cognitive
demand for young readers and writers. Like Parts A
and B, this component requires that students re-read and
re-examine the literary text, which will help them make
connections between the two texts in the components
that follow.
Sample ELA Item– Performance Task Part 4C English Language Arts, Grade 4
21. 21
PART D
On the lines below, list two Red Cross volunteer activities described in the article
that you think Tim would enjoy.
1.__________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
2.__________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Now write a sentence explaining why you think Tim would enjoy these activities.
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
In this component of the PT, students must now make a
connection between the two texts by identifying details
from the informational text that may apply to the char-
acter in the story. Thus, while this component is directly
aligned to Reading standard 1 (RI.4.1: Refer to details and
examples in a text…), it is also aligned to the reading
standard which states that students will “integrate infor-
mation from two texts” (RI.4.9). Moving beyond
identification of details and a focus on one text, this
component of the PT calls upon students to re-examine
two texts and evaluate a story’s character.
Sample ELA Item– Performance Task Part 4D English Language Arts, Grade 4
22. 22
PART E
Both “Tim’s Vacation” and “Get Involved, Be a Volunteer” give information about
volunteering. On the lines below, explain why volunteering is a good thing to do.
Describe the kinds of volunteering activities you would be interested in and why.
Be sure to use information from both passages to support your explanation.
In your response, be sure to
• explain why volunteering is a good thing to do
• describe the kinds of volunteering activities you would enjoy and why
• include a beginning, a middle, and an end in your writing
Check your writing for spelling, grammar, capitalization, and punctuation.
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
For the culminating component of the PT, students will
write essays that explicitly connect the information in
the two texts that they have read and examined. In their
essays, students will also explain a personal viewpoint on
the topic. Completing the essay will require students to
integrate many of the concepts and skills of the CCSS,
most notably the integration of information from two
texts (RI.4.9 and RL.4.9), drawing evidence from literary
and informational texts to support analysis and reflec-
tion while applying grade-appropriate reading standards
(W.4.9), and writing an opinion piece on topics or texts
(W.4.1). General writing guidelines and scoring criteria are
presented to the student in the prompt; these criteria are
directly linked to the CCSS, including Language standards
1–3. A robust response from a student will provide evi-
dence that the student can read, write, and think critically
and purposefully.
Sample ELA Item– Performance Task Part 4E English Language Arts, Grade 4
23. 23
Mathematics assessments under the Common Core
An equivalent set of higher standards are built into the math standards
for Common Core. These standards emphasize a balanced assessment
of understanding and procedural skills. To demonstrate understand-
ing, the student must justify why a particular mathematical statement
is true or where a mathematical rule comes from. These standards are
readiness-focused, rather than curriculum-focused, and are standardized
across all participating states, unlike the current frameworks.
Currently, according to a 2012 report from the President’s Council of
Advisors on Science and Technology, about 14% of 12th graders who
are interested in Science, Technology, Engineering, or Math (STEM)
fields do not have the math proficiency to qualify for the programs and
nearly 60% of students who enter college lack the math skills to major
in STEM. The new Common Core standards are designed to bring more
students up to STEM-ready math proficiency with math practice woven
throughout all grades and a strong emphasis on modeling.
The new standards for Mathematics require that students can:
• Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them
• Reason abstractly and quantitatively
• Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others
• Model with mathematics
• Use appropriate tools strategically
• Attend to precision
• Look for and make use of structure
• Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning
24. 24
1. A seafood market sells clams in bags of 8. A local fisherman delivers 92 clams
to the market. The model below shows the number of full bags of clams the
market can sell.
6 Mathematics
Which of these shows the remainder that should be included with the
model above?
A
B
C
D
At the elementary grade levels, number sense and
computation skills comprise a large and important
portion of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
This item provides students with a rectangular array that
models a contextual division problem. Students are then
asked to model the remainder that accompanies the
quotient of that problem. This not only allows an infer-
ence to be made about students’ mastery of the content
standard (4.NBT.6) but also provides evidence regarding
students’ mastery of modeling with mathematics, one
of the Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Sample Mathematics Item Mathematics, Grade 4
25. 25
2. Use the boxes below to write 3 different equations whose sum is equal to .
7 Mathematics
5
6
Sample Mathematics Item Mathematics, Grade 4
A key concept in number sense and computation is
demonstrating equivalency by representing numbers or
operations in multiple ways. This item requires students
to write several equations comprised of fractions that
sum to a given number (4.NF.3b). This item helps to
place students on the learning trajectory for computation
by providing multiple opportunities to demonstrate
mastery of the construct by differentiating among
students who can determine 1, 2, 3 (or 0) different ways
to model a sum for the given fraction.
26. 26
8 Mathematics
3. Gilbert planted many different seeds in his garden. As he planted them,
he noticed how the seeds for different plants were many different shapes and
sizes. He decided to keep one of each kind of seed for further study.
Gilbert recorded the length of ten seeds in the table below.
SEED MEASUREMENTS
Sample Mathematics Item Mathematics, Grade 4
This represents a typical mathematics performance
task found in CoreLink. It is comprised of several related
constructed-response sections, each of which aligns to
a single Common Core standard and comes with an
associated rubric. Some sections may align to the same
Common Core standard. Rubrics are each scored
separately; students are not penalized for applying
incorrect answers from one section to subsequent
sections of the performance task. In addition, the
sections of the performance task are scaffolded
in order to provide all students an equitable starting
point for demonstrating their mathematical knowledge.
This page shows the stimulus of the performance task,
which provides the context upon which all sections are
based and around which all questions are asked.
27. 27
PART A
Complete the line plot below to represent the data in the table.
SEED MEASUREMENTS
PART B
What is the difference in size, in inches, between Gilbert’s largest seed and his
smallest seed? Show your work in the space below. Write your answer on the line.
Show your work.
Answer___________inches
9 Mathematics
As noted previously, the performance task is scaffolded,
so Part A is a relatively simple task; students are asked
to place the provided data points on a line plot (4.MD.4).
However, they are first required to convert some of the
given fractions from simplest form to a common
denominator (a Grade 3 Common Core standard) in
order to correctly place them on the line plot. This
requires more quantitative reasoning than if the data
points were identical to the scale of the graph.
Part B continues the learning trajectory for 4.MD.4 by
asking students to use the information from Part A to
answer a comparison question. Students may solve the
item by the “traditional” method of subtracting fractions,
or they may use the graph they created in Part A, or they
may use any mathematically viable method that results
in a correct answer. This open-endedness in the solution
method allows students to demonstrate their understand-
ing of the construct in the way that makes the most
sense to them.
Sample Mathematics Item Mathematics, Grade 4
28. 28
At the time of writing, the consortia have not yet developed their
assessment offerings, and even after they have published their
assessments, states and districts can choose other vendors to
develop their Core curriculum-compliant tests.
Norm-referenced tests will play a significant role in the Common
Core environment. At this time, only one assessment development
company—CTB/McGraw-Hill—is ready with its norm-referenced
assessment, TerraNova Common Core, as well as with several Core-ready
products.
Evaluating your assessment options
How CTB/McGraw-Hill can
jumpstart your Common Core program
Gone are the days of cramming, memorizing, and teaching to the test,
when test items mapped to a single standard and multiple-choice items
were expected to be a true measure of mastery.
The new Common Core assessment requirements measure critical
thinking, problem solving, and 21st century skills. They are aligned not
just to factual knowledge, but to the requirements of college and a
successful career. Naturally these new standards will require new types
of assessments. Here are some examples of Common Core-ready
assessments you can purchase today.
29. TerraNova Common Core offers constructed-response, extended
constructed-response, and performance task items in the same test,
on the same scale. No other national achievement test developed to
date offers this combination, all in a single test book.
Results are available within seven days or less, and reports are designed
to show administrators, students, and teachers where they stand on
both national and the Common Core standards today and over time.
TerraNova Common Core is the only field-tested, valid, and authentic
measure of the CCSS currently available to districts today.
Use TerraNova Common Core to familiarize your teachers and students
with the new, more challenging test item types, to conduct early benchmarks,
and to get an early start on your transition plan.
The most respected, valid, and innovative national achievement test on
the market just raised the bar. TerraNova Common Core is an authentic
measure of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). These new
standards are rigorous, benchmarked, and require students to show,
demonstrate, and produce their work. Students must receive partial
credit for partial understanding of knowledge and skills identified in a
standard, which is beyond the ability of a multiple-choice test. As districts
transition to the Common Core they are realizing more and more that
to allow students to produce their work, and receive partial credit,
their assessment must offer new, innovative items such as constructed-
response, extended constructed-response, technology enhanced, and
performance tasks. TerraNova Common Core stands alone — it offers
all of these item types in the same test, on the same scale. Gain early
insight, ease your transition to Common Core , partner with CTB.
29
30. 30
Acuity InFormative Assessment™ System supports interim/benchmark
assessment and a process of formative assessment. Acuity informs
teaching and improves student learning with new diagnostic assessments
and components aligned to the CCSS. By tracking student progress,
identifying strengths and weaknesses, and targeting instruction, Acuity is
the total package for accelerating learning and achievement throughout
the school year.
The system includes:
• Assessments
• Reports
• Instructional resources
Use Acuity to build your own custom and performance assessments
for deeper insights into student understanding of important classroom
content. Reports provide detailed performance data at the student,
class, school, and district levels and enable targeted instruction to
individual students to who need additional practice.
Now Acuity delivers innovative resources for Grades K–12 that support
your gradual and effective transition to teaching and learning relative to
the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
The new editions of Acuity acquaint both students and educators with
the increased rigor of Common Core item types and assessments, and
include a critical instructional component that provides instructional
resources aligned to the Common Core . Acuity for the Common Core
incorporates a “through-course” assessment model with assessments in
Grades 3–8 that measure curriculum after specific intervals of instruction
are delivered: 25 percent, 50 percent, 75 percent, and 90 percent.
This solution also supports the creation of custom assessments using a
Common Core -aligned item bank and item authoring tools. By using
Acuity for the Common Core across the 3–12 grade span, educators
can gain rapid insight into curriculum continuity and efficacy within the
context of Common Core standards. Acuity for the Common Core
integrates assessment items that measure students’ performance in light
of college- and career-readiness. Assessments also promote better
understanding and application of important skills related to communication,
teamwork, and technology.
• Professional development
• Community
• Substantial resources
31. 31
CoreLink Services provides a set of custom solutions developed
specifically from the Common Core. They can be used to supplement
the current state summative assessment with an anchor-audit set of
items to test progress and validate readiness for the new assessments.
The CoreLink Services item bank offers technology-enhanced items
that educators can leverage in their online and adaptive testing solutions.
CoreLink items are:
• Psychometrically sound
• Include speaking, listening, writing, reading, language, and
mathematics content for Grades 3–8
• Provide defensible, reliable, cost-effective reporting of
student progress toward the Common Core
TM
In addition to the new item bank, CoreLink Services also offers research
and professional development services to complement the program.
This includes professional development services to help students utilize
test information to inform instruction, item development workshops,
training on how to score performance tasks, and more.
Use CoreLink as a standalone item bank and set of services, or pair it
with an existing state test to provide a reliable, valid, and comprehensive
overview of student progress. For those states not quite ready to implement
these item types, CoreLink Services also offers multiple-choice items
that can complement existing tests.
32. 32
As classroom populations grow more culturally and ethnically diverse,
so do your educational and assessment needs—especially the need to
measure language as it relates to classroom learning for K–adults.
The all-new Las Links is the world’s most advanced suite of English and
Spanish English Language Proficiency tools available—an integrated
system of assessment, instructional placement, instructional guidance,
and support for all English language learners.
This complete system includes a year’s worth of diagnostic assessment
and teaching tools designed to help promote language literacy so every
child can succeed in further education, and in his or her chosen career.
These materials can be used separately or in combination to create a
solution that meets your needs.
No other language proficiency products are as comprehensive and
powerful for placement, progress tracking, and curriculum planning
for ELL students. LAS Links helps educators:
• Quickly and accurately place incoming students with the LAS Links
Placement Test
• Measure Spanish language proficiency with LAS Links Español
• Monitor student progress with LAS Links Benchmark Assessments
• Build teacher skills using LAS Links Staff Development DVDs and
Training Audio CDs
• Augment curriculum with LAS Links Instruction Guidance that is
grade- and proficiency-level appropriate
CTB has taken the extra steps to align LAS Links test items to Common
Core State Standards. While students are improving their language
proficiency, they are also getting practice in answering the unique types
of test questions required by Common Core including:
• Performance tasks help uncover deeper levels of student
understanding
• Technology-enhanced items and assessments to provide instant
feedback to support students in moving steadily towards
achievement
• Extended constructed-response items to measure skills that are
difficult to assess with traditional multiple-choice items
• Writing items that improve students’ essay writing skills
LAS Links Language Assessments
33. 33
Inspire writing excellence
Written response items are now mandated by Common Core guide-
lines, but in many schools writing instruction has been slashed from
the curricula. Writing Roadmap helps teachers fill this knowledge gap
efficiently with a set of essay-writing exercises designed to challenge and
inspire students to learn to write better essays.
Writing Roadmap is a state-of-the-art online assessment solution that
helps your students improve their essay-writing skills, while allowing
teachers to spend less time grading and more time teaching. Writing
Roadmap provides students and teachers with instant feedback on writ-
ing assignments, including automatic scoring, instructional guidance,
and robust reporting.
Innovative instructional tools in Writing Roadmap provide students
with continuous support throughout the writing process, so they can
immediately improve their writing.
Use Writing Roadmap to bolster your students’ essay-writing skills.
Give them the best possible chance to excel at the new written test
items. In addition, Writing Roadmap’s tools will help prepare students
for the GED® Test, SAT, and ACT and complement CTB’s other assess-
ment solutions, including TerraNova, Third Edition, TABE, LAS Links,
and Acuity.
Major score increases on state tests
with Writing Roadmap
A 2007 study, “Online Writing Assessment in West Virginia,”
found consistent and statistically significant positive mean
score differences on the state summative writing tests for
students who practiced using Writing Roadmap software.
34. 34
Even if you’re off to a relatively slow start.
Even if your funds are extremely limited.
Even if you encounter resistance, unexpected roadblocks
or setbacks, more resources are being added every day,
including grants you may qualify for, online guidance,
teacher development resources, workshops, and more.
How will you get from here to Core?
One good place to start is with a free consultation
with CTB-McGraw- Hill. Call us to discuss how you
can make the most direct progress towards your
Core Curriculum goals.
35. 35
Assuming that your state has completed its transitional planning
(see page 1), all districts and schools should have three plans to
reference:
• A professional development plan for teachers
• A plan for changing or originating curriculum guides and other
instructional materials
• A plan for revising teacher evaluation systems
Familiarize yourself with these plans and lead the initiative to implement
these plans.
If your state does not currently have these plans in place, there are still
things you can do to move your district or school’s progress to the next
steps.
Become the expert
• Read about what other districts are doing (see links at the end of this
chapter).
• Introduce yourself to your state’s Common Core Team and volunteer
to help.
• Download the Common Core Implementation Workbook, read it,
and share it with other educators.
Planning your journey
Once your state plans are in place, your path ahead will become
clearer, and, because you prepared yourself for the coming
changes, you will be many steps ahead of other educators, ready
to lead the necessary change.
Become familiar with the new types of test items required
by Common Core, including performance tasks, technology-
enhanced items, extended constructed-response items, and
writing-based items.
CTB/McGraw-Hill has already developed Core-ready test items
you can try out with teachers and targeted groups of students.
These new test types will become more familiar as you work
with them, and will suggest new classroom strategies to better
prepare students for the tasks ahead. The sooner you become
fluent in Common Core best practices, the easier your
transition will be.
1.
2.
35
you work
es to better
ou become
our
3.
36. 36
Here are some of the top-line tasks to add to your plan between now and
the implementation of Common Core assessments in 2014-15. Having
the big-picture view of the tasks ahead will help you allocate resources,
create teams that share a common vision, and make strides towards full
implementation.
• Budget development to determine how much money is needed for
essentials such as training, communications, technology, assessments,
consulting, reporting, etc.
• Gap analysis to determine how close, or far, your students are from
the knowledge they need under the new standards
• Team building to assemble a guiding coalition of outside experts and
an internal leadership team
• Communications planning to enlist the support of all the stakehold-
ers and keep them in the loop
• Writing of instructional materials, including pilot items and tasks,
to align with Common Core and comply with bias and sensitivity
guidelines
• Educator training in the new, core curriculum, including
methods of teaching that prepare students for the new
types of assessment items to come
• Transition technology to reinforce current technology
infrastructure and become familiar with technology-based
assessment processes
• Transition assessments to familiarize teachers and students with the
new types of test items beyond multiple-choice. To prepare your staff
early, use CTB-McGraw-Hill Common Core-aligned assessments as
examples of what’s to come. See pages 29-33 for descriptions of
Common Core-ready assessments you can purchase now
• Transition accountability and data reporting system to prepare
teachers and administrators with after-test report submission proce-
dures and understand how to read, interpret, and report results
• Alignment of teacher preparation, evaluation, and licensing
to make sure all your teachers are ready to teach to the new
curriculum, are familiar with the different assessment item types,
and possess the necessary credentials
• Higher education transitioning to assure that all students
know their options for higher education and understand
that their school has prepared them for this track if they
wish to pursue it
After planning, what comes next?
37. 37
Item Bank
CoreLink Services is a cost-effective, comprehensive solution to help you
ease the transition to Common Core State Standards (CCSS). It includes
a new item bank that aligns to the Common Core, and a wide array of
professional development and psychometric services to help you
build a bridge from your existing standards to the Common Core State
Standards. Use the item bank to determine which students are on track
to meet the new standards, where gaps may exist, and how they can
be addressed.
• Ease the transition to Common Core assessments
• Gain early insight into student proficiency on the Common Core
• Quickly assess higher-order thinking skills
• Get accurate, reliable data to inform instruction
Developed for Grades 3–8, the CoreLink item bank features
comprehensive, innovative, rigorous items that measure the skills
students need to compete in college and the workplace, including:
• Speaking
• Listening
• Reading
Professional Development Services
• An introduction to the Common Core and item exemplars
• Guidance on how to “unpack” the standards, and inform
instruction and interim assessments
• Item development workshops for all item types, with
associated rubrics
• Handscoring opportunities that illustrate how items and
rubrics measure the Common Core State Standards
Psychometric Services
CoreLink Services adheres to the highest technical standards and
leverages the most current innovations in measurement methodology.
The result is a comprehensive, high quality item bank that meets
rigorous psychometric standards. This ensures reliable and valid results
that accurately measure student performance relative to the Common
Core. These services include:
• A test blueprint/cognitive rigor evaluation
• Field testing of content reflecting the new standards
• Linking studies
• Customized reporting
Services you may need as you move forward
• Language
• Mathematics
38. 38
Summative Master
Work plan developed/
work groups launched
Content and Item
Specifications
Development
Formative practice
development
and practice tests
administered
Pilot testing of
Common Core
Summative items
Common Core State
Standards adopted by
all member states
Write and review pilot
test items and tasks
Procurement
Plan developed
Field testing of Summative
and Interim items and tasks
Final achievement
standards (Summative)
verified and adopted
Preliminary
achievement
standards
(Summative)
proposed
BUDGET
DEVELOPMENT
GAP ANALYSIS FOR
STUDENTS &
TEAM BUILDING to
assemble a guiding
coalition of outside
experts and an internal
leadership team
COMMUNICATIONS
PLANNING to enlist
the support of all the
stakeholders and keep
them in the loop
ALIGN
INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIALS
TRAIN
EDUCATORS
TRANSITION
TECHNOLOGY AND
ASSESSMENTS
TRANSITION
ACCOUNTABILITY
AND DATA
REPORTING SYSTEM
ALIGN TEACHER
PREPARATION,
EVALUATION AND
LICENSING
INFORM STUDENT
TRANSITIONS TO
HIGHER EDUCATION
Place yourself on the timeline
ocococococococco ururuurururururememememeememe enenenennnnttt
2010- 2011 School Year 2011- 2012 School Year
2012- 2013 School Year
Preparation is key. Those who successfully follow their plan are more likely to have
higher test scores during the initial years of implementation. Those who fail to start
early and follow their plan may find their initial test scores falling under par.
For more guidance in executing the steps described here, contact your consortia,
or visit CTB.com/CommonCore.
2013- 2014 School Year 2014- 2015 School Year
39. 39
Common Core State Standards are a new set of rigorous academic
standards developed by participating state educators to set the founda-
tion for greater student growth and success. Grounded in research and
evidence, they specify K–12 expectations for college and career readi-
ness to assure all high school graduates are ready to succeed in their
lives ahead.
By 2014, states enrolled in the SMARTER Balanced Consortia (SBAC)
and the Partnership for Assessment Readiness for College and Careers
(PARCC) are expected to launch their new curriculum and assessment
programs. The assessments being developed by the Common Core
assessment consortia will include new types of item types that test
deeper levels of mastery than simple multiple-choice items can test.
These new item type requirements, in addition to innovative delivery
systems, will provide firm evidence of student knowledge and skills to
support valid inferences about their progress toward college and career
readiness.
In Summary
Use CTB/McGraw-Hill Common Core-ready assessments
throughout your transition plan to accelerate your progress
towards the 2014 deadline.
TM
For questions about CTB solutions and services, please
call 800.538.9547 or visit CTB.com.
LAS Links Language Assessments
40. 40
Glossary of Common Core
State Standards terms
Consortia
High-order skills
Evidence-based
Benchmarks
Summative assessments
Interim assessments
Formative assessments
Performance tasks
Technology-enhanced items
Extended constructed-response items
Writing items
Link summary
This link has videos from different states
commenting on Common Core:
www.corestandards.org/voices-of-support
Myths v. Facts About the Common Core State Standards:
www.corestandards.org/assets/CoreFacts.pdf
YouTube presentation on Common Core:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxefsLG2eps&list=UUF0pa3nE3aZAfBMT8
pqM5PA&index=2&feature=plcp
Resources