University of mysore
Department of library and information science
Subject : Library cataloguing
seminar topic :- co-operative cataloguing
Submitted by
Shashikumar mc
Mlisc
Ist sem b
Co-operative cataloguing
MEANING AND DEFINATION
co-operative cataloguing takes place when a number of
libraries co-operate in cataloguing of books.
Some library scientists have tried to explain the phenomenon
of co-operative cataloguing as under:
1. “when a number of independent libraries share the work
of producing a catalogue for their mutual benefit, this is
termed cooperative cataloguing”
2. “one simple from cooperative cataloguing may be said to
exist when a number of libraries take a share in the cost
and work of providing and maintain a centralized
cataloguing bureau and reap the benefit accruing from it
On the bois of these two definitions it can be said that co-
operative cataloguing and a procedure in which many
libraries share the responsibility of preparing catalogue
card and also the expenditure incurred in the venture for
mutual benefit. Cataloguing may also be some by the
participating libraries.
*co-operative in matter of cataloguing can be considered from
2 aspects
1. Technical - consist in bringing about a uniformity of from
in cataloguing
2. Bibliographical- in the making of printed material in
books or an cards available for different types of libraries.
Objectives of co-operative cataloguing
The objectives of co-operative cataloguing are
1. Better use of resources
2. Standardization of cataloguing practice
3. Economy in expenses
4. Improving the quality of library services
5. Preparation of union catalogue with relative
case.
Advantages:-
Advantage of co-operative cataloguing are many
and it server various purpose. Some important
futures can be given as under:
 ECONOMY: it is most economical from of
cataloguing as discussed above. It is not only save
money, man power and machinery also. Saving in
terms of money, man power and marching can be
utilized for other services in the library.
ELIMINATION OF DUPLICATION: if may eliminate
duplication of cataloguing work in liobraries.
QUALITY: It ensure Qualitative cataloguing at
cheaper cost because expert cataloguers can be
engaged to catalogue books at selected places.
UNIFORMITY: If ensure uniformity in internal and
physical forms of catalogue used by the
participating libraries.
QUANTITY: Quantity of books catalogued is
increased, i.e., more number of books can be
catalogued in less time.
UNION CATALOGUING: If may be helpful in
copmlication of union catalogue.
Disadvantages
 It gives rise to unemployment of cataloguers because
cataloguers are required only of the centralized or
selected places when the work a cataloguing is divided.
 Libraries adopting different form and type of
catalogues cannot participate in it.
 The cost of such a scheme coupled with the delay in
security cards would render it impracticable.
The fear that the libraries would be deprived of a
valuable part of their technical training and that their
opportunities for becoming acquitted with the
character and contents of books would be reduced.

Co operative cataloguing

  • 1.
    University of mysore Departmentof library and information science Subject : Library cataloguing seminar topic :- co-operative cataloguing Submitted by Shashikumar mc Mlisc Ist sem b
  • 2.
    Co-operative cataloguing MEANING ANDDEFINATION co-operative cataloguing takes place when a number of libraries co-operate in cataloguing of books. Some library scientists have tried to explain the phenomenon of co-operative cataloguing as under: 1. “when a number of independent libraries share the work of producing a catalogue for their mutual benefit, this is termed cooperative cataloguing” 2. “one simple from cooperative cataloguing may be said to exist when a number of libraries take a share in the cost and work of providing and maintain a centralized cataloguing bureau and reap the benefit accruing from it
  • 3.
    On the boisof these two definitions it can be said that co- operative cataloguing and a procedure in which many libraries share the responsibility of preparing catalogue card and also the expenditure incurred in the venture for mutual benefit. Cataloguing may also be some by the participating libraries. *co-operative in matter of cataloguing can be considered from 2 aspects 1. Technical - consist in bringing about a uniformity of from in cataloguing 2. Bibliographical- in the making of printed material in books or an cards available for different types of libraries.
  • 4.
    Objectives of co-operativecataloguing The objectives of co-operative cataloguing are 1. Better use of resources 2. Standardization of cataloguing practice 3. Economy in expenses 4. Improving the quality of library services 5. Preparation of union catalogue with relative case.
  • 5.
    Advantages:- Advantage of co-operativecataloguing are many and it server various purpose. Some important futures can be given as under:  ECONOMY: it is most economical from of cataloguing as discussed above. It is not only save money, man power and machinery also. Saving in terms of money, man power and marching can be utilized for other services in the library. ELIMINATION OF DUPLICATION: if may eliminate duplication of cataloguing work in liobraries.
  • 6.
    QUALITY: It ensureQualitative cataloguing at cheaper cost because expert cataloguers can be engaged to catalogue books at selected places. UNIFORMITY: If ensure uniformity in internal and physical forms of catalogue used by the participating libraries. QUANTITY: Quantity of books catalogued is increased, i.e., more number of books can be catalogued in less time. UNION CATALOGUING: If may be helpful in copmlication of union catalogue.
  • 7.
    Disadvantages  It givesrise to unemployment of cataloguers because cataloguers are required only of the centralized or selected places when the work a cataloguing is divided.  Libraries adopting different form and type of catalogues cannot participate in it.  The cost of such a scheme coupled with the delay in security cards would render it impracticable. The fear that the libraries would be deprived of a valuable part of their technical training and that their opportunities for becoming acquitted with the character and contents of books would be reduced.