The document provides a status update and planning information for the DESIRE project. Key points:
- The project has received positive feedback from a panel review, with expectations of high impact but also responsibility to deliver results.
- Work packages 1-3 should be nearing completion, while 4-6 are progressing. Several deliverables are expected in the coming months.
- Integration across work packages will focus on indicators, degradation mapping/comparison, stakeholder involvement, and policy engagement over the final year. Finalization of deliverables and preparation of dissemination products is the priority.
Presentation by Paul Selby, Planning and Environment Manager at the Planning Inspectorate, given at the Planning Inspectorate Wales conference on 30 September 2015
Report by PEMPAL performance budgeting working group - Naida Carsimamovic - W...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Naida Carsimamovic - World Bank - PEMPAL, at the 13th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials on Performance and Results held at the OECD Headquarters on 16-17 November 2017
This presentation was made by Faisal Naru, OECD, at the 13th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials on Performance and Results held at the OECD Headquarters on 16-17 November 2017
International trends in performance budgeting - Naida Carsimamovic, World Ban...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Naida Carsimamovic, PEMPAL, World Bank, and Nikolay Begchin, Ministry of Finance, Russian Federation, at the 14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance & Results network held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 26-27 November 2018
Expansion of OECD performance budgeting survey to PEMPAL countries - Nicolay ...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Nicolay Begchin, Russian Federation, at the 12th Annual Meeting of OECD-CESEE Senior Budget Officials held in Ljubljana, Slovenia, on 28-29 June 2016
Presented by Imre Hollo, Director, Division of Administration and Finance, WHO Regional Office for Europe at the 64th session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe, on 15 September 2014.
Presentation by Paul Selby, Planning and Environment Manager at the Planning Inspectorate, given at the Planning Inspectorate Wales conference on 30 September 2015
Report by PEMPAL performance budgeting working group - Naida Carsimamovic - W...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Naida Carsimamovic - World Bank - PEMPAL, at the 13th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials on Performance and Results held at the OECD Headquarters on 16-17 November 2017
This presentation was made by Faisal Naru, OECD, at the 13th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials on Performance and Results held at the OECD Headquarters on 16-17 November 2017
International trends in performance budgeting - Naida Carsimamovic, World Ban...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Naida Carsimamovic, PEMPAL, World Bank, and Nikolay Begchin, Ministry of Finance, Russian Federation, at the 14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance & Results network held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 26-27 November 2018
Expansion of OECD performance budgeting survey to PEMPAL countries - Nicolay ...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Nicolay Begchin, Russian Federation, at the 12th Annual Meeting of OECD-CESEE Senior Budget Officials held in Ljubljana, Slovenia, on 28-29 June 2016
Presented by Imre Hollo, Director, Division of Administration and Finance, WHO Regional Office for Europe at the 64th session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe, on 15 September 2014.
OECD Best Practices for Performance budgeting - Ivor Beazley, OECDOECD Governance
This presentation was made by Ivor Beazley, OECD, at the 13th Annual meeting on Performance and Results held at the OECD Headquarters on 16-17 November 2017
This presentation was made by Ivor Beazley, OECD, at the 13th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials on Performance and Results held at the OECD Headquarters on 16-17 November 2017
A guidebook for the development of national adaptation M&E systemsTariq A. Deen
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
Performance budgeting in the OECD: Highlights from the OECD 2011/2012 PB surv...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Lisa Von Trapp, OECD, at the 10th OECD-Asian Senior Budget Officials Annual Meeting held in Bangkok, Thailand, on 18-19 December 2014.
Improving the quality and impact of annual performance reporting - Glenn Purv...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Glenn Purves, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, at the 14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance & Results network held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 26-27 November 2018
A presentation made by Dr. Norman Walzer on the community visioning process on Tuesday March 25, 2014 at Fisher Chapel on the Rockford University campus. A video of the presentation is available at the Transform Rockford website (http://transformrockford.org/community-engagement/)
Improving the quality and impact of annual performance reporting - Sanita Til...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Sanita Tiltina, Ministry of Finance, Latvia, at the 14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance & Results network held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 26-27 November 2018
Update on OECD performance budgeting survey 2016 - Ronnie Downes, OECD Secret...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Ronnie Downes, OECD Secretariat, at the 12th Annual Meeting of OECD-CESEE Senior Budget Officials held in Ljubljana, Slovenia, on 28-29 June 2016
Progress towards Results: Overall Performance Study of the GEF (IWC5 Presenta...Iwl Pcu
Aaron Zazueta, GEF Evaluation Office
Presentation given during the 5th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference in Cairns, Australia during the results-based management session.
Using performance information for management - Eneken Lipp, EstoniaOECD Governance
This presentation was made by Eneken Lipp, Ministry of Finance, Estonia, at the 14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance & Results network held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 26-27 November 2018
Better data for better policies for better indicatorsOpenCoesione
"Better data for better policies for better indicators:
the role of Cohesion policy in Italy"
Seminar on strengthening ESIF policy indicators
Lisbon, 27 October 2014
This presentation was made by Zohra Khan, at the 3rd Experts Meeting on Gender Budgeting held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 19-20 September 2019
Presented by Leen Meulenbergs
WHO Representative to the European Union and
Executive Manager for Strategic Partnerships (PAR) in the WHO European Union, at the 66th Session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe.
OECD Best Practices for Performance budgeting - Ivor Beazley, OECDOECD Governance
This presentation was made by Ivor Beazley, OECD, at the 13th Annual meeting on Performance and Results held at the OECD Headquarters on 16-17 November 2017
This presentation was made by Ivor Beazley, OECD, at the 13th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials on Performance and Results held at the OECD Headquarters on 16-17 November 2017
A guidebook for the development of national adaptation M&E systemsTariq A. Deen
The session will provide details on: the tool developed by the LEG for monitoring and evaluating progress, effectiveness and gaps (PEG M&E tool) and its application in the process to formulate and implement NAPs; and the best practices for developing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for adaptation at the national level. It will also look at the experiences of countries in developing and applying M&E systems at their national levels.
Performance budgeting in the OECD: Highlights from the OECD 2011/2012 PB surv...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Lisa Von Trapp, OECD, at the 10th OECD-Asian Senior Budget Officials Annual Meeting held in Bangkok, Thailand, on 18-19 December 2014.
Improving the quality and impact of annual performance reporting - Glenn Purv...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Glenn Purves, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, at the 14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance & Results network held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 26-27 November 2018
A presentation made by Dr. Norman Walzer on the community visioning process on Tuesday March 25, 2014 at Fisher Chapel on the Rockford University campus. A video of the presentation is available at the Transform Rockford website (http://transformrockford.org/community-engagement/)
Improving the quality and impact of annual performance reporting - Sanita Til...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Sanita Tiltina, Ministry of Finance, Latvia, at the 14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance & Results network held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 26-27 November 2018
Update on OECD performance budgeting survey 2016 - Ronnie Downes, OECD Secret...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Ronnie Downes, OECD Secretariat, at the 12th Annual Meeting of OECD-CESEE Senior Budget Officials held in Ljubljana, Slovenia, on 28-29 June 2016
Progress towards Results: Overall Performance Study of the GEF (IWC5 Presenta...Iwl Pcu
Aaron Zazueta, GEF Evaluation Office
Presentation given during the 5th GEF Biennial International Waters Conference in Cairns, Australia during the results-based management session.
Using performance information for management - Eneken Lipp, EstoniaOECD Governance
This presentation was made by Eneken Lipp, Ministry of Finance, Estonia, at the 14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Senior Budget Officials Performance & Results network held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 26-27 November 2018
Better data for better policies for better indicatorsOpenCoesione
"Better data for better policies for better indicators:
the role of Cohesion policy in Italy"
Seminar on strengthening ESIF policy indicators
Lisbon, 27 October 2014
This presentation was made by Zohra Khan, at the 3rd Experts Meeting on Gender Budgeting held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 19-20 September 2019
Presented by Leen Meulenbergs
WHO Representative to the European Union and
Executive Manager for Strategic Partnerships (PAR) in the WHO European Union, at the 66th Session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe.
Measuring an adaptation goal: effectiveness and adequacyIIED
This is a presentation by senior researcher Susannah Fisher and researcher Brianna Craft of the Climate Change Group of the International Institute for Environment and Development.
It examines how their work with national governments on measuring effective adaptation, developing indicators and trying to understand short and longer-term effectiveness can contribute to assessing progress towards the global adaptation goal established in the Paris Agreement.
Fisher and Craft made the presentation at a joint OECD/IIED side event Identifying progress towards national and global adaptation goals at the Bonn climate change conference on May 18, 2016.
The conference served as the 44th session of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’s (UNFCCC) Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI 44) and Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA 44), as well as the first session of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement (APA 1).
More information: http://www.iied.org/how-measure-global-goal-for-adaptation
Collecting the PEPFAR OVC MER Essential Survey Indicators: Frequently Asked Q...MEASURE Evaluation
Gretchen Bachman and Christine Fu (USAID); Lisa Parker, Jenifer Chapman, Lisa Marie Albert, Walter Obiero, and Susan Settergren from MEASURE Evaluation. January 2017 Webinar.
Key findings, lessons learned and next steps for TrackFinTrackFin
This presentation was made during the TrackFin Intercountry Workshop in Rabat on 28-29th September 2014. It summarises the key finding and lessons learned from developing WASH-Accounts in the 3 countries (Brazil, Ghana and Morocco). It makes recommendations for the way forward, from the short to the longer term.
Slides from Damian Maye's Seminar - Using Living Labs to Strengthen Rural-Urban Linkages - Reflections from a multi-actor research project
Footage available at: https://youtu.be/Es1VHe69Mcw
Setting the scene – Trends in programming Research and Innovation for Impact Francois Stepman
6 April 2018. Rome. The SCAR Strategic Working Groups ARCH, AKIS and Food Systems organised jointly the Workshop: Programming Research and Innovation for Improved Impact
Presentation by Paul Winter
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) organized a three days Training Workshop on ‘Monitoring and Evaluation Methods’ on 10-12 March 2014 in New Delhi, India. The workshop is part of an IFAD grant to IFPRI to partner in the Monitoring and Evaluation component of the ongoing projects in the region. The three day workshop is intended to be a collaborative affair between project directors, M & E leaders and M & E experts. As part of the workshop, detailed interaction will take place on the evaluation routines involving sampling, questionnaire development, data collection and management techniques and production of an evaluation report. The workshop is designed to better understand the M & E needs of various projects that are at different stages of implementation. Both the generic issues involved in M & E programs as well as project specific needs will be addressed in the workshop. The objective of the workshop is to come up with a work plan for M & E domains in the IFAD projects and determine the possibilities of collaboration between IFPRI and project leaders.
Presentation held by Ioannis Vasileou, IFPRI-CCAFS and Daniel Mason-d'Croz IFPRI at the Strategic Foresight Conference in November in Washington DC, USA. Presentation covered CCAFS Phase 2 development and Scenario work.
Concept Note: "OECD Budgeting Outlook" - Ronnie Downes, OECDOECD Governance
This presentation was made by Ronnie DOWNES, OECD, at the 38th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials held in Lisbon, Portugal, on 1-2 June 2017
An analysis and key questions to consider for project sustainability and management. Some theoretical and practical aspects. The second part is using the YouthMetre Project to describe, explain and discuss sustainability issues
Similar to Cn mo11 2_alt_status_and_planning_final_hessel (20)
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
Cn mo11 2_alt_status_and_planning_final_hessel
1. Status and Planning
Fifth Plenary Workshop
Xi’an, China
11-18 Oct, 2010
Rudi Hessel, Coen Ritsema, Simone Verzandvoort, Erik van
den Elsen
2. Status
• Panel Review
• Work done
Planning
• Project framework
• Remaining activities and planning
3. Panel Review
Good to excellent project!
The EC has flagged the project internally for follow-up by EC
programme policy units as a:
• Success story
• High visibility/ media attractive project
• Project with impact on EU policies
• Significant impact on health, safety, environment
• Substantial breakthrough character
• Significant participation from outside EU
• Involvement of top researchers in the field
Compliment to us all!
But also a responsibility as expectations are high…
4. Panel Review – general observations/recommendations
• An ambitious, important and relevant project
• Collaboration between partners seems very good
• Project should contribute to scientific innovation and to policies at
national, EU and international level
• The HIS is very good, as is the project website
• Dissemination and exploitation of results (media, fact sheets etc.) is
so far very good
• impressive list of PhD and MSc studies done in the context of this
project
• Gender plan is excellent and exemplary for other projects
• Management team has done a very good job, both scientifically and
technically
5. Panel Review – requests to DESIRE
• Attention required for pending data delivery from study
sites (WB1 and WB5)
• Scientific innovation should be better demonstrated >>
management committee will increase efforts to increase
the visibility of the PhD research within the DESIRE
project
• Continuous emphasis should be given to an effective
involvement of stakeholders. Also, the involvement of the
policy level at the study sites needs to be improved. >>
focus now on WB4, 5 and 6
6. Panel Review – requests to DESIRE
• Continue to show DESIRE’s contribution to policies and
regulations at national, European and international level
• Verification of best management practices resulting from
the DESIRE-WOCAT method (WB3), including the
economic advantages >> in WB4&5
7. Panel Review – requests to DESIRE
• Attention for extrapolation to global scale >> show
possible use in other areas (eg through WOCAT) and by
cross-site comparison of results from WB1 (to be done), 2
(done), 3 (done), 4 (to be done) and 5 (to be done).
• Stronger quality management from the coordinator on
reports from partners and WB leaders.
• Where possible: uncertainty analysis in all work using
models (WB2, 4 and 5)
8. Panel Review – concrete points of action for WBs and NGOs
• NGOs:
• story lines on stakeholder integration and contribution
• Emphasis on integration of results in policy at national level
• WB1:
• completion of online WOCAT map database, interpretation of
maps, presentation on HIS
• Completion of driver & policy analysis and transfer to WB5 for
policy scenarios in DESMICE
• WB2: interactive tool for evaluating SLM techologies on HIS
• WB3: exchange visit
• WB4 & WB5:
• Verification of best management practices (scientific evidence…)
• Evaluation of policy scenarios and involvement of stakeholders
(WB4-5 workshops); apply lessons learned from WB3
• ensure availability of sufficient biophysical & economic data for all
sites
• WB6: Stronger policy involvement
9. Expected situation
at month 45
DESIRE – where do we stand?
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
WP 1.1
WP 1.2
WP 1.3
WP 1.4
WP 2.1
WP 2.2
WP 3.1
WP 3.2
WP 3.3
WP 4.1
WP 4.2
WP 4.3
WP 4.4
WP 4.5
WP 5.1
WP 5.2
WP 5.3
WP 5.4
WP 6.1
WP 6.2
WP 6.3
10. Regarding WBs and project deliverables:
• WB’s 1-3 should be almost finished or concluded by now
• WB’s 4-6 should be progressing full speed
DESIRE – where do we stand?
16. Project framework
DESIRE:
-Large 26 partners, 5 years, 9M euro
-Complex 16 study sites * 6 WBs * different stakeholders
-Confusing?
-Which work should be done for which WB?
-Why is this work needed?
-How do the WBs relate to each other?
21. (1) Identify system
boundaries,
stakeholders and
their goals (WB1)
(2) Describe socio-
cultural, economic,
technological, political
and environmental
context and drivers of
change (WB1)
(10) Adjust strategies to
ensure goals are met &
degradation prevented
(9) Apply remediation
strategies, monitor
degradation & progress
to goals
Establish
context and
goals
Identify,
evaluate &
select
remediation
strategies
Trial strategies
& model
regional
effects
Apply
remediation
strategies &
monitor
(4) Identify, evaluate &
document existing land
degradation remediation
options (WB3)
(8) Disseminate
strategies for
extension and
national &
international
policy (WB6)
New remediation strategies may be identified and
prioritised in response to changing contexts or
because existing strategies are no longer needed
or working
(3) Determine current
land degradation
status, future land
degradation risk and
existing soil/water
conservation (WB1,2)
Stake-
holder
Analysis
Land use
mapping
(WOCAT-LADA);
review of
secondary
sources
WOCAT-LADA expert
mapping; indicator
assessment
Learning for Sustainability
methodology; WOCAT
framework for technologies
and approaches evaluation
and documentation
Field-based
methods including
scientific and
stakeholder
monitoring
PESERA and economic
models
(e.g. Agent-Based Modelling;
Input-Output Models)
(6) Trial & monitor
remediation options in field
(WB4)
(5) Prioritize
remediation options
with stakeholders
(WB3)
(7) Model biophysical
and economic effects
of remediation options
at field & regional scale
(WB5)
Participatory Multi-
Criteria Evaluation
Manuals; leaflets; Videos; policy-
briefs; demonstrations etc.
22. Core of WBs
•WB1 employs a newly developed mapping method that
allows mapping of actual degradation status as well as of
actual measures taken against degradation
•WB2 extends an indicator approach that was developed for
Mediterranean Europe to make it suitable for areas around
the world
23. Core of WBs
•WB3 combined and adapted previously independent tools
into one consistent method to select and evaluate strategies
together with stakeholders
•WB4 trials strategies selected by stakeholders, with the
involvement of stakeholders, and by combining bio-physical
monitoring with socio-economic monitoring
24. Core of WBs
•WB5 will provide an extended PESERA model, and will
combine PESERA with socio-economic modelling to
simulate the effect of policy-relevant scenarios
•WB6 creates a Harmonised Information System using the
latest internet technology, and specifically addresses
different kinds of stakeholders using dissemination products
of different levels of complexity
25. Relationships between WBs
WB1
Context
WB2
Indicators
WB3
Strategies
WB4
Monitoring
WB5
Regional evaluation
WB6
Dissemination
Evaluate model output
(P, PM)
Identify, evaluate,
select strategies (P,
PM)
Explore stakeholder
properties & needs (P,
PM)
Explore NRM institute
properties & needs
(PM)
Select and use
dissemination
products (P, PM, S)
Involvement of stakeholders:
Practitioners (P)
Planners and managers (PM)
Scientific community (S)
Legend
Information flow between WBs
Design, implement & monitor
strategies (P)
Evaluate indicators
(P, PM)
26. RELATIONSHIPS WBs
Relationships WBs:
-Some WBs need results of other WBs
-Some WBs can combine activities
-Input from other WBs into WB6 can be divided in 2 parts
-Internal: needed to perform project tasks
-External: needed for dissemination
27. Relationships WBs
WB1:
• Current status of drivers, problems, measures
etc for all WBs
• Provides policy scenario for each site to WB5,
in collaboration with NGOs
WB2:
• Provides method to asses state of
desertification, as impacted by drivers and land
use & management, using indicators
• Method to be used and updated in WB4
• Data to be used in WB5
28. Relationships WBs
WB3:
• Core stakeholder participation
• Selection of technology
• Technology for WB4
• Data for WB5
WB4:
• Tests technologies selected in WB3
• Uses (some) methods from WB2
• Provides data for WB5
• Provides advice at plotfield scale
29. Relationships WBs
WB5 Scenarios will cover:
• Selected site-specific policy from WB1
• Selected technology from WB3 (tested in
WB4)
• Other policy-relevant scenarios, such as
climate change or land use change
WB6:
Translates results of WB1-5 into messages for
stakeholders, together with these WBs,
and assisted by NGOs
31. Deliverables
Delive
rable
No
Deliverable title Delivery
date
1.2.1
An overview of desertification problems in the study
countries (map & report)
Sept
2009
1.3.1
Identified drivers of land degradation with specific
reference to the study areas at field, local and policy
level.
Sept
2009
2.2.2
Report on developed methodology for evaluation
applied land management practices using indicators
July 2010
2.2.3
A manual on “Using Indicators for Identifying Best
Management Practices for Combating Desertification”
July 2011
3.2.2 Reports on farm exchange visits Oct 2010
32. Deliverables
Delive
rable
No
Deliverable title Delivery
date
4.3.1
A report with a summary of the scientific findings, in
which the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of the
conservation measures in each hotspot area are described
May
2011
4.4.1 Improved set of indicators Jul 2011
4.5.1
Report with a description of common, widely applicable
conservation measures and integration of the results
across the hotspot areas. Translation of the results and
presentation to the stakeholder communities, assistance in
drafting good agricultural practice guidelines
Jul 2011
33. Deliverables
5.3.1
Model outputs for each hotspot site to identify the likely
environmental, environmental and social effects of
proposed remediation strategies
Jun 2011
5.4.1
A list of recommended remediation strategies within
each region for policy-makers and extensionists
Jul 2011
5.4.2
A methodological approach and modelling tool that can
be used to evaluate remediation options beyond this
project
Jul 2011
6.3.2 Suite of dissemination and training products Jan 2012
6.3.3
Final DESIRE workshop on results and products with
stakeholders invited
Jan 2012
34. Activity deadline
Monitoring May 2011
Analysis monitoring per site (incl CBA, collab WB5) May 2011
Improving indicators with WB2 Jul 2011
Comparison of sites Jul 2011
Stakeholder workshop (with WB5) Jul 2011
Guidelines good agricultural practices Jul 2011
Main actions
WB4
35. Activity deadline
Models completed Done
PESERA input data Jan 2011
Base runs PESERA Mar 2011
Definition scenarios completed Mar 2011
Scenario results Jun 2011
Recommended strategies Jul 2011
Stakeholder workshop (with WB4) Jul 2011
Methodological approach and modelling tool Jul 2011
Main actions
WB5
36. Activity deadline
Site specific dissemination plans (incl products) Feb 2011
Dissemination products completed Jan 2012
3 policy papers Jan 2012
Implement policy influencing strategy Jan 2012
Policy messages per site Jan 2012
Feedback to UNCCD completed Jan 2012
Story lines of stakeholder involvement Jan 2012
Final plenary meeting with stakeholders Jan 2012
Main actions
WB6 & NGOs
37. Planning
On the verge of the last year…
Which should be:
•Year of Integration (things coming together)
•Year of Finalisation (things being completed)
•Year of Dissemination
38. Integration
•Using and improving indicators (WB2, 3 (local
indicators), 4)
•Degradation status and risk maps, and comparison of
these (WB1,2,4,5)
•WOCAT (WB1,3,4 (to evaluate plot results), 5(as input
for modelling))
•Involving (local) stakeholders (in principle all, but
probably mainly WB3-6, NGOs)
•Reaching policy makers (in principle all, but probably
mainly WB1,5,6, NGOs)
40. Dissemination
•Think stakeholders for your study site and/or WB!
•Preparing dissemination products
•Final stakeholder workshop
•Reaching out to (local) stakeholders
•Reaching out to Policy makers
•Input for HIS
41. Conclusion
Keep in mind that we do not just aim to provide deliverables
to EU!
We have responsibility towards stakeholders too
If DESIRE is successful, this will hopefully make a real
difference in the study sites