Slides for Class 3 Journalism Ethics: Trends in four principles of ethical decision-making: Seeking truth & reporting it; Acting independently; Demonstrating accountability; Minimizing harm
This document outlines the syllabus and assignments for a journalism ethics course. It introduces the instructor, discusses four theories of ethics that will be covered (rule-based, ends-based, golden rule, golden mean), and presents an ethical decision-making process. Assignments include weekly blog posts and comments analyzing ethics cases, developing personal ethics guidelines, and a final paper proposing a reform in media ethics. The document also reviews upcoming deadlines and assigned readings.
This document provides an overview of an introductory class on journalism ethics taught by Bill Mitchell. The class introduces ethics theories and principles, assignments for the course including weekly blog posts and comments, and guidance on setting up personal blogs for the class. Students will engage in self-introductions, discuss approaches to ethical decision-making, and explore ethics case studies and challenges faced by journalists. The goal is for students to develop personal ethics guidelines by considering various perspectives on journalism ethics.
This document outlines the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics course. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class will take place at Northeastern University on July 27, 2015. The topics to be covered include correcting errors, a student presentation on hashtags, refining personal ethics guidelines, and a discussion of the readings "Shattered Glass" and plagiarism. Students will develop a personal ethics statement, comment on a classmate's blog post, and submit a paper and outline on an issue in media ethics. They will also review cases of plagiarism and fabrication in journalism.
This document provides an overview of a journalism ethics course, including:
- The instructor's contact information and an outline of topics to be covered in the class meeting, including discussing final paper ideas, an introduction to media economics, and reviewing assigned readings.
- Discussion points about key concepts in media economics, such as scarce resources, the relationship between scarcity and value, and the implications of content becoming less scarce.
- Consideration of challenges faced by media organizations in sustaining their value and business models amidst disruption, and possible ethical issues related to strategies for new value creation or sustaining existing value.
This document outlines the topics and schedule for an ethics course titled "Perspectives on Journalism Ethics" taught by instructor Bill Mitchell. The course will cover the final version of an assignment on correcting errors, privacy and the law, issues of taste in coverage, diversity in staffing and news coverage, and a case study. It provides context and guidelines for various ethics dilemmas and scenarios. Assignments include the error correction piece, blog posts, comments on others' posts, and a final paper proposing a reform to an area of media ethics.
This document summarizes the key topics and agenda for a class on journalism ethics taught by instructor Bill Mitchell. The class will discuss the ethics of deception in journalism, ethics of visual journalism, emerging business models, and affirmative ethics approaches. It outlines expectations for the final paper due at the end of the course focusing on a proposed reform to an area of media ethics.
This document provides an overview of an introductory class on journalism ethics taught by Bill Mitchell. The class introduces ethics theories and principles, assignments for the course including weekly blog posts and comments, and guidance on setting up personal blogs for the class. Students will engage in self-introductions, discuss approaches to ethical decision-making, and explore ethics cases and challenges faced by journalists.
This document outlines the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics course. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class will take place at Northeastern University on July 27, 2015. The topics to be covered include correcting errors, a student presentation on hashtags, refining personal ethics guidelines, and a discussion of the readings "Shattered Glass" and plagiarism. Students will develop a personal ethics statement, comment on a classmate's blog post, and submit a draft outline of their final paper on an issue in media ethics.
This document outlines the syllabus and assignments for a journalism ethics course. It introduces the instructor, discusses four theories of ethics that will be covered (rule-based, ends-based, golden rule, golden mean), and presents an ethical decision-making process. Assignments include weekly blog posts and comments analyzing ethics cases, developing personal ethics guidelines, and a final paper proposing a reform in media ethics. The document also reviews upcoming deadlines and assigned readings.
This document provides an overview of an introductory class on journalism ethics taught by Bill Mitchell. The class introduces ethics theories and principles, assignments for the course including weekly blog posts and comments, and guidance on setting up personal blogs for the class. Students will engage in self-introductions, discuss approaches to ethical decision-making, and explore ethics case studies and challenges faced by journalists. The goal is for students to develop personal ethics guidelines by considering various perspectives on journalism ethics.
This document outlines the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics course. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class will take place at Northeastern University on July 27, 2015. The topics to be covered include correcting errors, a student presentation on hashtags, refining personal ethics guidelines, and a discussion of the readings "Shattered Glass" and plagiarism. Students will develop a personal ethics statement, comment on a classmate's blog post, and submit a paper and outline on an issue in media ethics. They will also review cases of plagiarism and fabrication in journalism.
This document provides an overview of a journalism ethics course, including:
- The instructor's contact information and an outline of topics to be covered in the class meeting, including discussing final paper ideas, an introduction to media economics, and reviewing assigned readings.
- Discussion points about key concepts in media economics, such as scarce resources, the relationship between scarcity and value, and the implications of content becoming less scarce.
- Consideration of challenges faced by media organizations in sustaining their value and business models amidst disruption, and possible ethical issues related to strategies for new value creation or sustaining existing value.
This document outlines the topics and schedule for an ethics course titled "Perspectives on Journalism Ethics" taught by instructor Bill Mitchell. The course will cover the final version of an assignment on correcting errors, privacy and the law, issues of taste in coverage, diversity in staffing and news coverage, and a case study. It provides context and guidelines for various ethics dilemmas and scenarios. Assignments include the error correction piece, blog posts, comments on others' posts, and a final paper proposing a reform to an area of media ethics.
This document summarizes the key topics and agenda for a class on journalism ethics taught by instructor Bill Mitchell. The class will discuss the ethics of deception in journalism, ethics of visual journalism, emerging business models, and affirmative ethics approaches. It outlines expectations for the final paper due at the end of the course focusing on a proposed reform to an area of media ethics.
This document provides an overview of an introductory class on journalism ethics taught by Bill Mitchell. The class introduces ethics theories and principles, assignments for the course including weekly blog posts and comments, and guidance on setting up personal blogs for the class. Students will engage in self-introductions, discuss approaches to ethical decision-making, and explore ethics cases and challenges faced by journalists.
This document outlines the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics course. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class will take place at Northeastern University on July 27, 2015. The topics to be covered include correcting errors, a student presentation on hashtags, refining personal ethics guidelines, and a discussion of the readings "Shattered Glass" and plagiarism. Students will develop a personal ethics statement, comment on a classmate's blog post, and submit a draft outline of their final paper on an issue in media ethics.
This document outlines the topics and activities covered in an ethics journalism class. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class takes place at Northeastern University. The class will include discussing a recent error in the Boston Globe, an oral presentation on hashtags, reviewing personal ethics guidelines and assigned readings, and discussing upcoming assignments. There will also be a 10 minute break and a review of the principles of truth, minimizing harm, independence and accountability.
The document discusses various recent publications focused on ethics guidelines for journalists. It describes updated codes of ethics from the Society of Professional Journalists and guiding principles from a book edited by Kelly McBride and Tom Rosenstiel. It also summarizes crowd-sourced ethics "building blocks" from ONA, a plagiarism and fabrication guide from several journalism groups, and handbooks on verification and rules for local news startups. The document advocates for continued discussion on ethics from groups like the Reuters Institute and voices like Jay Rosen, and endorses Bob Steele's 10 questions for guiding ethical decisions.
This document outlines a 4 part framework for a social justice proposal:
Part I provides the theoretical and historical perspectives from scholars on the social justice challenge, including definitions, areas of agreement and disagreement.
Part II examines the perspectives of local stakeholders on the causes, consequences and solutions, and how they compare to the scholars.
Part III presents a proposal for action by the social justice community to address the identified challenge, including an overview, steps, timeline, and discussions of required cooperation and potential resistance.
Part IV justifies why the community should join in the proposed action by relating it to the scholarly arguments, stakeholder perspectives, and shared community values.
Dan Gillmor's talk at Joi's KMD Digital Journalism ClassJoi Ito
This document outlines Dan Gillmor's vision for media in a networked age. It discusses how media has shifted from Media 1.0 to Media 3.0 as participation has increased. Supply of media is discussed, noting how boundaries have blurred between professional and amateur creators. On demand, it notes information overload and issues of accuracy and trust. Principles for consumers emphasize skepticism, judgment, research and free thinking. Principles for journalists focus on thoroughness, accuracy, fairness, independence and transparency. The overall goal is to make both consumers and creators of media more active participants.
This document discusses the changing landscape of journalism and provides insights into its future. It notes that new players like Jeff Bezos, Pierre Omidyar and their companies are bringing serious money and innovation through experimentation to reinvent journalism. Traditional newsrooms are struggling with disruption but regeneration will follow. The core tasks of verification, sense-making, eyewitness reporting and investigation will still be needed. Successful future organizations will combine aggregation and original reporting, scale carefully, and have a focus on experimentation and strong technical backends.
This document provides guidance on how to identify and write a viewpoint article. It explains that a viewpoint is an opinion piece meant to persuade readers on a public issue. It discusses identifying the public problem, stating one's private opinion on it, and who might care about the issue. It gives examples of discussing who is affected by the problem and who could help solve it. The document encourages generating potential controversial topics to write about and provides tips for engaging readers on specific aspects of those topics.
1. The document provides advice for researchers on how to work effectively with their institution's public information officers (PIOs).
2. PIOs can help researchers by pitching their stories to media outlets, which can lead to funding opportunities, awards nominations, and research partnerships for the researchers.
3. PIOs may provide media training, help craft key messages and communication strategies, and measure the impact of research stories. However, researchers often come to PIOs too late or only want publicity for minor achievements.
This document outlines the agenda for a journalism ethics class. It discusses upcoming presentations on ethical issues in presidential campaigns and two case studies on the CIA and an overdose video. It reviews steps for ethical decision making and goes through two example cases, summarizing the New York Times' decision to publish the name of a CIA analyst and a local paper's decision on whether to publish an overdose video. The document assigns reading and preparation for the next class.
This document provides guidance on preparing for and conducting media interviews. It discusses understanding the media and their deadlines and goals. It emphasizes the importance of preparing key messages and facts in advance. It outlines best practices for interacting with reporters, including negotiating an "interview contract", directly answering questions, staying on message, and following up afterwards. The overall goal is to help spokespeople feel confident and in control during interviews to effectively communicate their messages to the public.
Caroline Cassidy's comms tips for policy influence. Caroline is Communications Manager at the Research and Policy in Development (RAPID) programme at the Overseas Development Institute. This was presented at the Grand Challenges Canada Global Mental Health Community meeting in Seattle, 2014. Listen to Caroline present here (from slide 27): http://mhinnovation.net/policy-brief
This presentation was given at the AAFP Family Medicine Congressional Conference (FMCC) on May 14, 2013. The goal of this presentation was to help attendees understand the relationship between media relations and advocacy, their role in an interview, and how reporters work.
This document provides an overview of key concepts in media relations and public relations research. It discusses the differences between advertising and public relations, with PR taking a slower, steadier approach to build brands over time. Various PR terms are defined, including projects, programs, and campaigns. The document also outlines the purposes and methods of formative research, including casual research, secondary research, and primary research. It describes how to analyze situations, organizations, and target publics to understand opportunities and obstacles.
This document discusses journalism ethics and values. It examines whether ethics should be timeless or adapt to changes. The author analyzes updates to core principles from 1990s-2015 regarding truth, transparency, accountability and consequences. Guidance is provided in 45 specific areas like reporting issues, writing, conduct, policies and financing. Enforcing ethics through codes and conversations rather than legal action is discussed. The use of confidential sources and linking practices are debated from an ethical perspective. Overall, the document explores balancing core values with adapting to changes in technology and society.
The document discusses ethics in journalism. It begins by defining ethics as standards of right and wrong based on analysis and thought. It notes that journalism is about truth-seeking and those in the news system have a public responsibility to respect law and ethics. The core values of journalism according to the SPJ are to seek truth, minimize harm, act independently, and be accountable. The document also provides several ethical dilemmas journalists may face and 10 questions they should consider to help make ethical decisions.
1) Advocacy is defined as a process to influence policy and decision makers through strategically using information to change policies that affect disadvantaged groups. It involves changing attitudes, actions, policies, and laws by influencing powerful individuals and organizations.
2) Successful advocacy requires getting to know key players, committees, and decision makers. It also involves creating strategic alliances, anticipating opposition strategies, and using media strategically.
3) Effective advocacy planning identifies influencers and decision makers, understands their perspectives, and develops evidence-based messages and promotion strategies tailored to specific audiences.
Audience analysis is the process of understanding the characteristics and needs of the intended recipients of a communication. It benefits communicators by allowing them to tailor the content, style, format and tone of their message to best meet the needs and expectations of their audience. The document describes different methods for conducting an audience analysis, including using the AUDIENCE framework or creating an audience analysis grid to identify the primary and secondary audiences, their expertise, needs and the context in which they will receive the information. Conducting an audience analysis helps ensure communicators provide the right information to the right audience in the right way.
Educating Decision Makers & Telling Our Story: Advocacy Lessons from the Wiza...Jim McKay
This document provides guidance on advocating for public policy changes to support children and families. It discusses key advocacy concepts like defining goals, assessing issues, and determining effective messaging strategies. It also addresses common myths about advocacy, how non-profits can advocate and lobby within legal guidelines, and tips for educating decision makers through meetings and media outreach. The overall message is that collective advocacy from committed groups can create meaningful policy changes to improve outcomes for children.
Media and its impacts on public health policyChristine Wood
The document discusses media and its impact on public policy. It provides examples of advocacy campaigns and how social media can be used. It outlines some key principles for effective media advocacy including framing your message, engaging different audiences, giving people a voice, and making issues relatable. The goal of media advocacy is to change perspectives and expand discussions to engage communities and decision makers. It also discusses challenges like dealing with opposition and the importance of collaboration.
This document provides guidance on effectively engaging with politicians. It emphasizes identifying key stakeholders and understanding who influences decisions. It recommends mapping stakeholders, prioritizing influencers, and categorizing supporters and opponents. The document also stresses developing clear, concise messages and considering the best approaches - such as private meetings, media, or partnerships - to engage stakeholders and achieve desired policy outcomes.
This document outlines the topics and activities covered in an ethics journalism class. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class takes place at Northeastern University. The class will include discussing a recent error in the Boston Globe, an oral presentation on hashtags, reviewing personal ethics guidelines and assigned readings, and discussing upcoming assignments. There will also be a 10 minute break and a review of the principles of truth, minimizing harm, independence and accountability.
The document discusses various recent publications focused on ethics guidelines for journalists. It describes updated codes of ethics from the Society of Professional Journalists and guiding principles from a book edited by Kelly McBride and Tom Rosenstiel. It also summarizes crowd-sourced ethics "building blocks" from ONA, a plagiarism and fabrication guide from several journalism groups, and handbooks on verification and rules for local news startups. The document advocates for continued discussion on ethics from groups like the Reuters Institute and voices like Jay Rosen, and endorses Bob Steele's 10 questions for guiding ethical decisions.
This document outlines a 4 part framework for a social justice proposal:
Part I provides the theoretical and historical perspectives from scholars on the social justice challenge, including definitions, areas of agreement and disagreement.
Part II examines the perspectives of local stakeholders on the causes, consequences and solutions, and how they compare to the scholars.
Part III presents a proposal for action by the social justice community to address the identified challenge, including an overview, steps, timeline, and discussions of required cooperation and potential resistance.
Part IV justifies why the community should join in the proposed action by relating it to the scholarly arguments, stakeholder perspectives, and shared community values.
Dan Gillmor's talk at Joi's KMD Digital Journalism ClassJoi Ito
This document outlines Dan Gillmor's vision for media in a networked age. It discusses how media has shifted from Media 1.0 to Media 3.0 as participation has increased. Supply of media is discussed, noting how boundaries have blurred between professional and amateur creators. On demand, it notes information overload and issues of accuracy and trust. Principles for consumers emphasize skepticism, judgment, research and free thinking. Principles for journalists focus on thoroughness, accuracy, fairness, independence and transparency. The overall goal is to make both consumers and creators of media more active participants.
This document discusses the changing landscape of journalism and provides insights into its future. It notes that new players like Jeff Bezos, Pierre Omidyar and their companies are bringing serious money and innovation through experimentation to reinvent journalism. Traditional newsrooms are struggling with disruption but regeneration will follow. The core tasks of verification, sense-making, eyewitness reporting and investigation will still be needed. Successful future organizations will combine aggregation and original reporting, scale carefully, and have a focus on experimentation and strong technical backends.
This document provides guidance on how to identify and write a viewpoint article. It explains that a viewpoint is an opinion piece meant to persuade readers on a public issue. It discusses identifying the public problem, stating one's private opinion on it, and who might care about the issue. It gives examples of discussing who is affected by the problem and who could help solve it. The document encourages generating potential controversial topics to write about and provides tips for engaging readers on specific aspects of those topics.
1. The document provides advice for researchers on how to work effectively with their institution's public information officers (PIOs).
2. PIOs can help researchers by pitching their stories to media outlets, which can lead to funding opportunities, awards nominations, and research partnerships for the researchers.
3. PIOs may provide media training, help craft key messages and communication strategies, and measure the impact of research stories. However, researchers often come to PIOs too late or only want publicity for minor achievements.
This document outlines the agenda for a journalism ethics class. It discusses upcoming presentations on ethical issues in presidential campaigns and two case studies on the CIA and an overdose video. It reviews steps for ethical decision making and goes through two example cases, summarizing the New York Times' decision to publish the name of a CIA analyst and a local paper's decision on whether to publish an overdose video. The document assigns reading and preparation for the next class.
This document provides guidance on preparing for and conducting media interviews. It discusses understanding the media and their deadlines and goals. It emphasizes the importance of preparing key messages and facts in advance. It outlines best practices for interacting with reporters, including negotiating an "interview contract", directly answering questions, staying on message, and following up afterwards. The overall goal is to help spokespeople feel confident and in control during interviews to effectively communicate their messages to the public.
Caroline Cassidy's comms tips for policy influence. Caroline is Communications Manager at the Research and Policy in Development (RAPID) programme at the Overseas Development Institute. This was presented at the Grand Challenges Canada Global Mental Health Community meeting in Seattle, 2014. Listen to Caroline present here (from slide 27): http://mhinnovation.net/policy-brief
This presentation was given at the AAFP Family Medicine Congressional Conference (FMCC) on May 14, 2013. The goal of this presentation was to help attendees understand the relationship between media relations and advocacy, their role in an interview, and how reporters work.
This document provides an overview of key concepts in media relations and public relations research. It discusses the differences between advertising and public relations, with PR taking a slower, steadier approach to build brands over time. Various PR terms are defined, including projects, programs, and campaigns. The document also outlines the purposes and methods of formative research, including casual research, secondary research, and primary research. It describes how to analyze situations, organizations, and target publics to understand opportunities and obstacles.
This document discusses journalism ethics and values. It examines whether ethics should be timeless or adapt to changes. The author analyzes updates to core principles from 1990s-2015 regarding truth, transparency, accountability and consequences. Guidance is provided in 45 specific areas like reporting issues, writing, conduct, policies and financing. Enforcing ethics through codes and conversations rather than legal action is discussed. The use of confidential sources and linking practices are debated from an ethical perspective. Overall, the document explores balancing core values with adapting to changes in technology and society.
The document discusses ethics in journalism. It begins by defining ethics as standards of right and wrong based on analysis and thought. It notes that journalism is about truth-seeking and those in the news system have a public responsibility to respect law and ethics. The core values of journalism according to the SPJ are to seek truth, minimize harm, act independently, and be accountable. The document also provides several ethical dilemmas journalists may face and 10 questions they should consider to help make ethical decisions.
1) Advocacy is defined as a process to influence policy and decision makers through strategically using information to change policies that affect disadvantaged groups. It involves changing attitudes, actions, policies, and laws by influencing powerful individuals and organizations.
2) Successful advocacy requires getting to know key players, committees, and decision makers. It also involves creating strategic alliances, anticipating opposition strategies, and using media strategically.
3) Effective advocacy planning identifies influencers and decision makers, understands their perspectives, and develops evidence-based messages and promotion strategies tailored to specific audiences.
Audience analysis is the process of understanding the characteristics and needs of the intended recipients of a communication. It benefits communicators by allowing them to tailor the content, style, format and tone of their message to best meet the needs and expectations of their audience. The document describes different methods for conducting an audience analysis, including using the AUDIENCE framework or creating an audience analysis grid to identify the primary and secondary audiences, their expertise, needs and the context in which they will receive the information. Conducting an audience analysis helps ensure communicators provide the right information to the right audience in the right way.
Educating Decision Makers & Telling Our Story: Advocacy Lessons from the Wiza...Jim McKay
This document provides guidance on advocating for public policy changes to support children and families. It discusses key advocacy concepts like defining goals, assessing issues, and determining effective messaging strategies. It also addresses common myths about advocacy, how non-profits can advocate and lobby within legal guidelines, and tips for educating decision makers through meetings and media outreach. The overall message is that collective advocacy from committed groups can create meaningful policy changes to improve outcomes for children.
Media and its impacts on public health policyChristine Wood
The document discusses media and its impact on public policy. It provides examples of advocacy campaigns and how social media can be used. It outlines some key principles for effective media advocacy including framing your message, engaging different audiences, giving people a voice, and making issues relatable. The goal of media advocacy is to change perspectives and expand discussions to engage communities and decision makers. It also discusses challenges like dealing with opposition and the importance of collaboration.
This document provides guidance on effectively engaging with politicians. It emphasizes identifying key stakeholders and understanding who influences decisions. It recommends mapping stakeholders, prioritizing influencers, and categorizing supporters and opponents. The document also stresses developing clear, concise messages and considering the best approaches - such as private meetings, media, or partnerships - to engage stakeholders and achieve desired policy outcomes.
Communicating via media and opinion writingKara Gavin
This document provides information about public relations and opinion writing for medical professionals. It discusses the roles and goals of public relations teams in communicating research and stories from their institutions. Some key points covered include:
1) Tips for interacting with news media, such as preparing with a PR person, using layperson terms, and respecting reporters' independence.
2) Guidance on writing opinion pieces and commentaries, such as identifying a central message and structure, and targeting the right publication based on goals and audience.
3) Examples of recent opinion pieces by other medical professionals and outlets to consider publishing in, along with advice to disseminate pieces strategically once published.
Living our credo_values_facilitator_presentationPablo Galiana
The document discusses Johnson & Johnson's (J&J) Credo values and decision making process. It provides an overview of the objectives which include exploring the origin and importance of the Credo, understanding how it impacts jobs, and using case studies to show how Credo values help employees make ethical choices. It then discusses the Credo in more detail including its history and values. It outlines a 7-step decision making process incorporating Credo values and considering stakeholders. Finally, it discusses using multiple perspectives when examining ethical issues and provides examples of applying the Credo to case studies.
Jim Proce - Credibility, Hard Questions, &Trust - 2018 PWX Presentation (vers...Jim Proce
Based on the article of the same name, published in December of 2017, Jim Proce presents the topic at APWA 2018 PWX and TPWA 2018. Credibility, Hard Questions and Trust!
Don’t miss our upcoming webinars: Subscribe today!
In this webinar:
Ryan Clarke, President and Founder of Advocacy Solutions, will introduce you to the foundational components of advocacy and take you through the step-by-step process of developing an effective advocacy strategy. He will also help us gain an understanding of how shaping the advocacy agenda is evolving in the context of COVID-19.
View the video:
https://youtu.be/l_6FVFnwoNU
To learn more about CCSN, visit us at survivornet.ca
Follow CCSN on social media:
Twitter - https://twitter.com/survivornetca
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/CanadianSurvivorNet
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/survivornet_ca/
Pinterest - https://www.pinterest.com/survivornetwork
This document provides guidance on public relations strategies for consumer relations and international public relations. It discusses researching an organization's reputation and consumer audiences. The document recommends organizations call consumer groups proactively, empower employees to help consumers, and control media conversations. For international PR, it advises researching a company and country context, starting small, networking with local leaders, and offering an olive branch through cultural exchange programs.
This document provides an overview of journalism ethics. It defines ethics as a branch of philosophy involving concepts of right and wrong conduct. Journalism ethics helps journalists make defensible decisions by identifying ethical tensions, clarifying stakeholders, and assessing harm and benefit. The document discusses four theories of ethics and emphasizes that ethics is about finding a "third option" rather than just common sense. It provides examples of ethical concerns in journalism like minimizing harm, transparency, and truthfulness. The document concludes with recommendations for establishing ethical guidelines and processes for news organizations.
This document outlines the topics and schedule for a journalism ethics class. It lists 23 student presentations on various issues in journalism ethics such as content marketing, journalism in China, reporting on death, live coverage, free speech, going undercover, the line between journalism and PR, reporters becoming part of the story, and more. It provides the instructor's contact information and outlines upcoming assignments, including student comments, a final paper, and course evaluations.
This document outlines the topics that were discussed in a journalism ethics and issues class. The instructor discussed developing social media strategies for journalists and some ethical issues they may face. Students also discussed fact-based journalism in an increasingly fact-free era, getting perspectives from Trump supporters, digging deeper into policy announcements, and alternative ways of reporting stories. The class covered emerging trends like advocacy groups doing journalism and optimism as a journalistic category. Upcoming assignments were outlined which included students presenting a three minute summary of their final paper on a journalism ethics question.
This document summarizes the key topics and assignments from a journalism ethics class. It discusses reviewing ethics guidelines from the Center for Investigative Reporting on issues like anonymous sources, misrepresentation, and undercover work. It also covers a chapter on deception in reporting. Upcoming assignments include analyzing a journalist's Twitter use and presenting a summary of each student's final ethics paper.
This document provides an overview of the remaining classes for a journalism ethics course. It includes a preview of upcoming guest speakers on ethics topics, details of quizzes and assignments. The instructor reviews answers to a recent quiz, covering topics like media ownership, digital audiences, privacy and visual journalism. Upcoming assignments involve reading articles by guest speaker Cristela Guerra on reporting ethics and analyzing a Nightline segment for its coverage of ethics issues.
This document summarizes a journalism ethics and issues class. It discusses covering diverse societies and multiculturalism, including various constituencies that supported Trump. It reviews lessons from campaign coverage, such as the need for rigorous fact-checking and more attention to Trump's supporters. The class will discuss a racial profiling case study, assignments, and have a quiz. It provides guidance on thoughtfully covering other cultures and when identifying sources by attributes like race is appropriate.
This document provides an overview of topics to be covered in a journalism ethics class, including social media ethics, personal ethics guidelines, the business of journalism, and ethical issues in the presidential campaign. It discusses emerging forms of digital advertising like sponsored content and native advertising. It also summarizes readings assigned for the next class on the Washington Post's ownership and newspapers' transition to digital.
This document summarizes the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics class. The class will include discussions of the ethics of game journalism, reporting on the Syrian conflict, and ethical issues in the 2016 US presidential campaign. It outlines readings from a textbook on dealing with sources and reviews lessons from a journalist at the Washington Post. Students are assigned to write a story that covers an event from an ethics angle and to read and discuss each other's ethics codes.
This document summarizes an ethics class discussion on journalism issues. It discusses coverage of political campaigns and ethical considerations around privacy, taste and offense. The class reviewed chapters on making decisions around privacy and taste in news coverage. They discussed the "right to be forgotten" and challenges balancing truth, privacy and minimizing harm. Assignments included reading chapters on sources and preparing for a guest speaker on investigative reporting.
This document provides an overview of the topics and activities covered in a journalism ethics and issues class. The class will discuss cultural influences on media coverage, ethical issues in presidential campaign coverage, the verification process, and chapters from the textbook on getting the story right and being fair. It also reviews a case study on how the fact-checking organization Storyful verified a viral weather video. Guidelines from the Associated Press and New York Times on language use are presented. Students will discuss checklists for accurate reporting and are assigned to read additional chapters for the next class along with submitting a personal ethics code.
Class 8 fall 2016 slides for slidesharebmitchslides
This document summarizes the key topics that were covered in a journalism ethics class, including:
1) Examples of past cases of plagiarism and fabrication by journalists such as Janet Cooke and Jayson Blair.
2) The stakeholders impacted by plagiarism and fabrication, such as audiences, subjects, and employers.
3) Types of plagiarism like appropriation and research plagiarism.
4) Ways for journalists to avoid plagiarism through proper attribution and being careful during research.
5) The consequences journalists face if caught fabricating or plagiarizing, such as losing their job and career.
This document summarizes a journalism ethics class that covered:
1. Presentations on ethical issues in reporting on Trump and Buzzfeed.
2. A discussion of next step journalism, which involves documenting stories, providing context and verification, and advancing stories through correction and analysis.
3. An assignment to read about moral decision making and comment on classmates' posts, with a quiz upcoming on class material.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17Celine George
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
2. PERSPECTIVES ON
JOURNALISM ETHICS
JRNL 6202 SUMMER II 2015
• Instructor: Bill Mitchell
• Bmitch (at) gmail dot com
• 727-641-9407
• 20 July 2015 | Northeastern Univ.
3. YUJING INTRO
(ABOUT FIVE MINUTES)
3
• Who you are
• Why journalism in particular or media in general
• How you make ethical decisions
• try to sum it up in one word, and then elaborate
• Your sense of the state of media ethics
• one word followed by elaboration
• What you’re looking for from this class
• one word followed by elaboration
4. WHAT WE’LL DO TONIGHT
• Review of assigned readings
• Oral presentations by Audrey & Matt
• 10 minute break (at about 7:30 p.m.)
• This week in ethics
• Working a case
• Upcoming assignments, etc.
5. CLASS PARTICIPATION & ITS
RELEVANCE TO ETHICAL
DECISION-MAKING
• If you’re not inclined to speak up, consider doing so
• If you speak up a lot, consider encouraging others
• Do your best to stay on point
• Try to make your point briefly
6. ETHICS CODES AS
DECISION-MAKING TOOLS
• An argument against ethics codes?
• An argument in favor?
• 4 Guiding Principles of Society of Professional Journalists?
7. DRILLING DOWN ON THE PRINCIPLES:
SEEK TRUTH & REPORT IT
• Confirming names, ages, dates, every line in story
• Can you spell your name for me, please?
• And what’s your date of birth?
• Develop your own accuracy-checker system!
• Presenting sources to your audience
• With names if possible
• With as much description as possible
• With background on their motives as relevant
8. DRILLING DOWN ON THE PRINCIPLES:
SEEK TRUTH & REPORT IT, CONT.
• Be clear with audience about what you’re providing them
• News?
• Analysis?
• Opinion?
• Maintaining the integrity of the marketing tools of news
• Headlines
• Teases
• Blurbs
9.
10.
11. TRENDS IN TRUTH-TELLING
• Greater documentation, making source documents available
• More challenges to anonymous sources
12.
13.
14. DRILLING DOWN ON THE PRINCIPLES:
MINIMIZE HARM
• Show compassion for stakeholders affected by news coverage
• Stakeholders in this story?
15. TRENDS IN MINIMIZING HARM
• The “foreverness” of digital content
• To what extent should we have the right to “forgetability?”
16.
17. DRILLING DOWN ON THE PRINCIPLES:
ACT INDEPENDENTLY
• Independent from what?
• Apart from loyalty to audience, any other loyalties you want to
retain?
18. TRENDS IN ACTING INDEPENDENTLY
• More paragraphs beginning… “Full disclosure:
• More content provided by brands
• Relevance of independence in that context?
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24. DRILLING DOWN ON THE PRINCIPLES:
BE ACCOUNTABLE
• Accountable about what?
• What should journalists NOT be accountable about?
• Advantages of making the case for each in personal guidelines
• Accountable to whom?
28. TRENDS IN ACCOUNTABILITY
• Anticipating audience questions, challenges, objections
• Incorporating audience contributions
• Recognizing corrections as ways of advancing the story
37. After watching and listening to Donald Trump
since he announced his candidacy for
president, we have decided we won't report on
Trump's campaign as part of The Huffington
Post's political coverage. Instead, we will
cover his campaign as part of our
Entertainment section. Our reason is simple:
Trump's campaign is a sideshow. We won't
take the bait. If you are interested in what The
Donald has to say, you'll find it next to our
stories on the Kardashians and The
Bachelorette.
THIS WEEK IN ETHICS, CONT.
38. THREE MAIN STEPS
TO A GOOD DECISION
• Collect the information
• Analyze the information
• Make a choice and defend it
39. THREE MAIN STEPS
TO A GOOD DECISION (IN DETAIL)
• Collect the information
• What do I Know? What do I need to know?
• What is my journalistic purpose?
• What are my ethical concerns?
40. THREE MAIN STEPS
TO A GOOD DECISION (IN DETAIL)
• Analyze the information
• What policies/rules should I consider?
• How can I include other people with different views?
• Who are the stakeholders?
• What are possible consequences of my actions?
• What are at least 3 options in balancing truth-telling
and minimizing harm?
41. THREE MAIN STEPS
TO A GOOD DECISION (IN DETAIL)
• Make a choice and defend it
• The front-page test: How would this read as a story?
• The Mom test: What would she say about this?
• The jury test: Could you persuade 12 peers?
42. WORK A CASE
WITH FOREMAN’S 3 STEPS
• Teams of three
• Pick a case that’s tough, i.e. you’re not sure how you’d
decide… Possibilities:
• Reporting a Fact, Causing Harm (p. 98)
• A 4 year-old’s Visit to Death Row (p. 204)
• A believable hypothetical
43. ASSIGNMENTS:
• Reading: Chapters 9, 10, 13 in Foreman book
• By 7 a.m. Friday 24 July: First draft of your personal
ethics guidelines
• By 7 a.m. Sunday 26 July: A post to your blog
• By 3 p.m. Monday 27 July: A comment about a
classmate’s post