This document outlines the syllabus and assignments for a journalism ethics course. It introduces the instructor, discusses four theories of ethics that will be covered (rule-based, ends-based, golden rule, golden mean), and presents an ethical decision-making process. Assignments include weekly blog posts and comments analyzing ethics cases, developing personal ethics guidelines, and a final paper proposing a reform in media ethics. The document also reviews upcoming deadlines and assigned readings.
Slides for Class 3 Journalism Ethics: Trends in four principles of ethical decision-making: Seeking truth & reporting it; Acting independently; Demonstrating accountability; Minimizing harm
This document provides an overview of an introductory class on journalism ethics taught by Bill Mitchell. The class introduces ethics theories and principles, assignments for the course including weekly blog posts and comments, and guidance on setting up personal blogs for the class. Students will engage in self-introductions, discuss approaches to ethical decision-making, and explore ethics case studies and challenges faced by journalists. The goal is for students to develop personal ethics guidelines by considering various perspectives on journalism ethics.
This document outlines the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics course. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class will take place at Northeastern University on July 27, 2015. The topics to be covered include correcting errors, a student presentation on hashtags, refining personal ethics guidelines, and a discussion of the readings "Shattered Glass" and plagiarism. Students will develop a personal ethics statement, comment on a classmate's blog post, and submit a paper and outline on an issue in media ethics. They will also review cases of plagiarism and fabrication in journalism.
This document provides an overview of a journalism ethics course, including:
- The instructor's contact information and an outline of topics to be covered in the class meeting, including discussing final paper ideas, an introduction to media economics, and reviewing assigned readings.
- Discussion points about key concepts in media economics, such as scarce resources, the relationship between scarcity and value, and the implications of content becoming less scarce.
- Consideration of challenges faced by media organizations in sustaining their value and business models amidst disruption, and possible ethical issues related to strategies for new value creation or sustaining existing value.
This document outlines the topics and schedule for an ethics course titled "Perspectives on Journalism Ethics" taught by instructor Bill Mitchell. The course will cover the final version of an assignment on correcting errors, privacy and the law, issues of taste in coverage, diversity in staffing and news coverage, and a case study. It provides context and guidelines for various ethics dilemmas and scenarios. Assignments include the error correction piece, blog posts, comments on others' posts, and a final paper proposing a reform to an area of media ethics.
This document provides an overview of an introductory class on journalism ethics taught by Bill Mitchell. The class introduces ethics theories and principles, assignments for the course including weekly blog posts and comments, and guidance on setting up personal blogs for the class. Students will engage in self-introductions, discuss approaches to ethical decision-making, and explore ethics cases and challenges faced by journalists.
This document outlines the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics course. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class will take place at Northeastern University on July 27, 2015. The topics to be covered include correcting errors, a student presentation on hashtags, refining personal ethics guidelines, and a discussion of the readings "Shattered Glass" and plagiarism. Students will develop a personal ethics statement, comment on a classmate's blog post, and submit a draft outline of their final paper on an issue in media ethics.
This document outlines the topics and activities covered in an ethics journalism class. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class takes place at Northeastern University. The class will include discussing a recent error in the Boston Globe, an oral presentation on hashtags, reviewing personal ethics guidelines and assigned readings, and discussing upcoming assignments. There will also be a 10 minute break and a review of the principles of truth, minimizing harm, independence and accountability.
Slides for Class 3 Journalism Ethics: Trends in four principles of ethical decision-making: Seeking truth & reporting it; Acting independently; Demonstrating accountability; Minimizing harm
This document provides an overview of an introductory class on journalism ethics taught by Bill Mitchell. The class introduces ethics theories and principles, assignments for the course including weekly blog posts and comments, and guidance on setting up personal blogs for the class. Students will engage in self-introductions, discuss approaches to ethical decision-making, and explore ethics case studies and challenges faced by journalists. The goal is for students to develop personal ethics guidelines by considering various perspectives on journalism ethics.
This document outlines the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics course. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class will take place at Northeastern University on July 27, 2015. The topics to be covered include correcting errors, a student presentation on hashtags, refining personal ethics guidelines, and a discussion of the readings "Shattered Glass" and plagiarism. Students will develop a personal ethics statement, comment on a classmate's blog post, and submit a paper and outline on an issue in media ethics. They will also review cases of plagiarism and fabrication in journalism.
This document provides an overview of a journalism ethics course, including:
- The instructor's contact information and an outline of topics to be covered in the class meeting, including discussing final paper ideas, an introduction to media economics, and reviewing assigned readings.
- Discussion points about key concepts in media economics, such as scarce resources, the relationship between scarcity and value, and the implications of content becoming less scarce.
- Consideration of challenges faced by media organizations in sustaining their value and business models amidst disruption, and possible ethical issues related to strategies for new value creation or sustaining existing value.
This document outlines the topics and schedule for an ethics course titled "Perspectives on Journalism Ethics" taught by instructor Bill Mitchell. The course will cover the final version of an assignment on correcting errors, privacy and the law, issues of taste in coverage, diversity in staffing and news coverage, and a case study. It provides context and guidelines for various ethics dilemmas and scenarios. Assignments include the error correction piece, blog posts, comments on others' posts, and a final paper proposing a reform to an area of media ethics.
This document provides an overview of an introductory class on journalism ethics taught by Bill Mitchell. The class introduces ethics theories and principles, assignments for the course including weekly blog posts and comments, and guidance on setting up personal blogs for the class. Students will engage in self-introductions, discuss approaches to ethical decision-making, and explore ethics cases and challenges faced by journalists.
This document outlines the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics course. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class will take place at Northeastern University on July 27, 2015. The topics to be covered include correcting errors, a student presentation on hashtags, refining personal ethics guidelines, and a discussion of the readings "Shattered Glass" and plagiarism. Students will develop a personal ethics statement, comment on a classmate's blog post, and submit a draft outline of their final paper on an issue in media ethics.
This document outlines the topics and activities covered in an ethics journalism class. The instructor is Bill Mitchell and the class takes place at Northeastern University. The class will include discussing a recent error in the Boston Globe, an oral presentation on hashtags, reviewing personal ethics guidelines and assigned readings, and discussing upcoming assignments. There will also be a 10 minute break and a review of the principles of truth, minimizing harm, independence and accountability.
This document provides an overview of journalism ethics. It defines ethics as a branch of philosophy involving concepts of right and wrong conduct. Journalism ethics helps journalists make defensible decisions by identifying ethical tensions, clarifying stakeholders, and assessing harm and benefit. The document discusses four theories of ethics and emphasizes that ethics is about finding a "third option" rather than just common sense. It provides examples of ethical concerns in journalism like minimizing harm, transparency, and truthfulness. The document concludes with recommendations for establishing ethical guidelines and processes for news organizations.
The document discusses various recent publications focused on ethics guidelines for journalists. It describes updated codes of ethics from the Society of Professional Journalists and guiding principles from a book edited by Kelly McBride and Tom Rosenstiel. It also summarizes crowd-sourced ethics "building blocks" from ONA, a plagiarism and fabrication guide from several journalism groups, and handbooks on verification and rules for local news startups. The document advocates for continued discussion on ethics from groups like the Reuters Institute and voices like Jay Rosen, and endorses Bob Steele's 10 questions for guiding ethical decisions.
This document outlines the key points from a NewsU session on journalism values in the digital age. The session covered defining core journalism values like seeking truth, acting independently, minimizing harm, and engaging communities. It discussed applying these values through ethical decision making processes and real-world case studies. Diversity was also presented as another important value that improves quality and engagement. Finally, attendees were asked to reflect on what journalism means to them personally and how they uphold these values in their own work.
This document outlines the agenda for a journalism ethics class. It discusses upcoming presentations on ethical issues in presidential campaigns and two case studies on the CIA and an overdose video. It reviews steps for ethical decision making and goes through two example cases, summarizing the New York Times' decision to publish the name of a CIA analyst and a local paper's decision on whether to publish an overdose video. The document assigns reading and preparation for the next class.
This document provides an overview of audience theory, including key theorists such as Katz & Bulmler, Morley, Hall, and Ang & Katz & Lazersfeld. It discusses key concepts in audience theory, such as primary, secondary, and tertiary media. It also covers debates around active vs passive audiences and the effects of media vs how audiences interact with media. The document provides examples of hypodermic theory, cultivation analysis, and the two-step flow model to illustrate different perspectives on audiences. It encourages students to research uses and gratification theory and reception theory as part of learning about audience theory.
The document discusses ethics in journalism. It begins by defining ethics as standards of right and wrong based on analysis and thought. It notes that journalism is about truth-seeking and those in the news system have a public responsibility to respect law and ethics. The core values of journalism according to the SPJ are to seek truth, minimize harm, act independently, and be accountable. The document also provides several ethical dilemmas journalists may face and 10 questions they should consider to help make ethical decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities in Evaluations with Diverse Populations: A Critical ...Washington Evaluators
This document discusses how critical race theory (CRT) can provide a framework for more ethical and valid evaluations with diverse populations. It outlines five key tenets of CRT methodology, including placing race at the center of research and challenging notions of neutrality. CRT holds that race and racism are deeply embedded in American life and influence all aspects of the evaluation process. The document advocates applying CRT lenses to better address power imbalances and community benefit, ensuring representation of marginalized groups' experiences and knowledge, and conducting research that promotes social justice and ongoing collaboration with communities.
This document provides a brief history of ethical thought and theories. It discusses how modern ethical theories originated from ancient Greek and religious thinkers like Socrates, Aristotle, Judaism and early Christians. It then describes several major ethical theories including utilitarianism, which focuses on maximizing benefits for society; duty and rights ethics, which focus on individual rights and duties; and virtue ethics, which focuses on good character. The document notes that multiple theories should be considered when analyzing an ethical problem. It concludes by discussing non-Western ethical philosophies like Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam and their emphasis on community, virtue and moral duties.
Citation maniuplation: The good, the bad and the uglyC0pe
This document provides an overview of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and its resources and services. COPE began in 1997 as a small group helping biomedical journal editors but has grown significantly. It now has over 12,000 members from various disciplines and provides many free resources like guidelines, case databases, and webinars to help editors and publishers handle ethical issues. Recently, COPE restructured its resources around 10 "Core Practices" to make information more accessible, like allegations of misconduct, authorship, peer review processes, and more. The goal is to present a high-level, principled approach to publication ethics issues on its website.
Citation manipulation the good, the bad and the uglySabahMoran
This document provides an overview of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and its resources and services. COPE began in 1997 as a small group helping biomedical journal editors but has grown significantly. It now has over 12,000 members from various disciplines and provides many free resources like guidelines, case databases, and webinars to help editors handle ethics issues like misconduct, authorship, conflicts of interest, and more. Recently, COPE restructured its resources under 10 "Core Practices" to make information more accessible for members dealing with different types of ethics issues in publishing.
The document discusses models of decision making and ethical paradigms related to balancing individual rights and community standards. It presents the rational model of decision making as a four-step process of identifying problems, generating solutions, selecting an option, and evaluating. It also notes that understanding ethical dilemmas requires viewing issues multidimensionally and that tensions can arise between individual liberties and societal expectations, particularly for educators.
This document provides an overview of action research for students. It defines action research as an orientation towards inquiry that seeks engagement and curiosity through gathering evidence and testing practices. The document outlines five key principles of action research: 1) practical knowledge for everyday use, 2) naturalistic settings, 3) participative research, 4) change as a verb, and 5) critical reflection. It also discusses different types of action research on a spectrum from technical to critical. Students are then prompted to use the principles to evaluate sample abstracts and begin planning their own action research project.
This document provides an overview of the key functions and components of research proposals. It discusses how proposals serve as a means of communication, a plan, and a contract. Various types of proposals are described, including academic, grant, and IRB proposals. Common components like the introduction, literature review, methods, and findings sections are outlined. Tips are provided for defining substantive and epistemic research interests and refining proposals through multiple drafts. The document concludes with a proposal checklist.
PowerPoint for Elsevier and the Publisher Role in Supporting Publishing Ethic...PoojaJain26457
- Elsevier has taken steps to strengthen its policies and practices around publishing ethics over the past decade, including introducing common approaches to conflicts of interest and ethical guidelines, requiring codes to be included in electronic submissions, and launching resources like PERK and joining COPE.
- CrossCheck, Elsevier's plagiarism detection software, now screens over 400 journals and aims to ramp up screening for all submissions.
- Statistics from mid-2011 show fewer ethics cases reported in physics and chemistry journals compared to the previous year, but more retractions. Common issues include plagiarism, duplicate publication, and authorship disputes.
- Editors play a key role in ethics judgments, though determining author contributions or research fraud can
This document summarizes a workshop on advocacy for libraries. The workshop aims to explore advocacy within libraries, highlight the importance of mission and purpose, and understand how to advocate to different viewpoints. It covers defining advocacy, different philosophical approaches to social justice, and how to design an effective advocacy strategy tailored to the audience. Participants will discuss the Northern Ireland context and consider how to advocate for libraries by speaking the language of decision makers and communities.
COMM5600 Interviews & Focus groups TO SHARE (1).pptRashiRashi21
The document provides an overview of how interviews and focus groups can be used as research methods in media and communications research. It discusses how they can provide personal accounts and interpretations, understand beliefs and behaviors in context, and generate frameworks for further research. It notes the types of interviews, issues of power dynamics and identity, and practical considerations for conducting interviews and focus groups such as developing an interview guide, sampling, logistics, ethics, and analyzing the data.
This document outlines the topics and schedule for a journalism ethics class. It lists 23 student presentations on various issues in journalism ethics such as content marketing, journalism in China, reporting on death, live coverage, free speech, going undercover, the line between journalism and PR, reporters becoming part of the story, and more. It provides the instructor's contact information and outlines upcoming assignments, including student comments, a final paper, and course evaluations.
This document provides an overview of journalism ethics. It defines ethics as a branch of philosophy involving concepts of right and wrong conduct. Journalism ethics helps journalists make defensible decisions by identifying ethical tensions, clarifying stakeholders, and assessing harm and benefit. The document discusses four theories of ethics and emphasizes that ethics is about finding a "third option" rather than just common sense. It provides examples of ethical concerns in journalism like minimizing harm, transparency, and truthfulness. The document concludes with recommendations for establishing ethical guidelines and processes for news organizations.
The document discusses various recent publications focused on ethics guidelines for journalists. It describes updated codes of ethics from the Society of Professional Journalists and guiding principles from a book edited by Kelly McBride and Tom Rosenstiel. It also summarizes crowd-sourced ethics "building blocks" from ONA, a plagiarism and fabrication guide from several journalism groups, and handbooks on verification and rules for local news startups. The document advocates for continued discussion on ethics from groups like the Reuters Institute and voices like Jay Rosen, and endorses Bob Steele's 10 questions for guiding ethical decisions.
This document outlines the key points from a NewsU session on journalism values in the digital age. The session covered defining core journalism values like seeking truth, acting independently, minimizing harm, and engaging communities. It discussed applying these values through ethical decision making processes and real-world case studies. Diversity was also presented as another important value that improves quality and engagement. Finally, attendees were asked to reflect on what journalism means to them personally and how they uphold these values in their own work.
This document outlines the agenda for a journalism ethics class. It discusses upcoming presentations on ethical issues in presidential campaigns and two case studies on the CIA and an overdose video. It reviews steps for ethical decision making and goes through two example cases, summarizing the New York Times' decision to publish the name of a CIA analyst and a local paper's decision on whether to publish an overdose video. The document assigns reading and preparation for the next class.
This document provides an overview of audience theory, including key theorists such as Katz & Bulmler, Morley, Hall, and Ang & Katz & Lazersfeld. It discusses key concepts in audience theory, such as primary, secondary, and tertiary media. It also covers debates around active vs passive audiences and the effects of media vs how audiences interact with media. The document provides examples of hypodermic theory, cultivation analysis, and the two-step flow model to illustrate different perspectives on audiences. It encourages students to research uses and gratification theory and reception theory as part of learning about audience theory.
The document discusses ethics in journalism. It begins by defining ethics as standards of right and wrong based on analysis and thought. It notes that journalism is about truth-seeking and those in the news system have a public responsibility to respect law and ethics. The core values of journalism according to the SPJ are to seek truth, minimize harm, act independently, and be accountable. The document also provides several ethical dilemmas journalists may face and 10 questions they should consider to help make ethical decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities in Evaluations with Diverse Populations: A Critical ...Washington Evaluators
This document discusses how critical race theory (CRT) can provide a framework for more ethical and valid evaluations with diverse populations. It outlines five key tenets of CRT methodology, including placing race at the center of research and challenging notions of neutrality. CRT holds that race and racism are deeply embedded in American life and influence all aspects of the evaluation process. The document advocates applying CRT lenses to better address power imbalances and community benefit, ensuring representation of marginalized groups' experiences and knowledge, and conducting research that promotes social justice and ongoing collaboration with communities.
This document provides a brief history of ethical thought and theories. It discusses how modern ethical theories originated from ancient Greek and religious thinkers like Socrates, Aristotle, Judaism and early Christians. It then describes several major ethical theories including utilitarianism, which focuses on maximizing benefits for society; duty and rights ethics, which focus on individual rights and duties; and virtue ethics, which focuses on good character. The document notes that multiple theories should be considered when analyzing an ethical problem. It concludes by discussing non-Western ethical philosophies like Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam and their emphasis on community, virtue and moral duties.
Citation maniuplation: The good, the bad and the uglyC0pe
This document provides an overview of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and its resources and services. COPE began in 1997 as a small group helping biomedical journal editors but has grown significantly. It now has over 12,000 members from various disciplines and provides many free resources like guidelines, case databases, and webinars to help editors and publishers handle ethical issues. Recently, COPE restructured its resources around 10 "Core Practices" to make information more accessible, like allegations of misconduct, authorship, peer review processes, and more. The goal is to present a high-level, principled approach to publication ethics issues on its website.
Citation manipulation the good, the bad and the uglySabahMoran
This document provides an overview of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and its resources and services. COPE began in 1997 as a small group helping biomedical journal editors but has grown significantly. It now has over 12,000 members from various disciplines and provides many free resources like guidelines, case databases, and webinars to help editors handle ethics issues like misconduct, authorship, conflicts of interest, and more. Recently, COPE restructured its resources under 10 "Core Practices" to make information more accessible for members dealing with different types of ethics issues in publishing.
The document discusses models of decision making and ethical paradigms related to balancing individual rights and community standards. It presents the rational model of decision making as a four-step process of identifying problems, generating solutions, selecting an option, and evaluating. It also notes that understanding ethical dilemmas requires viewing issues multidimensionally and that tensions can arise between individual liberties and societal expectations, particularly for educators.
This document provides an overview of action research for students. It defines action research as an orientation towards inquiry that seeks engagement and curiosity through gathering evidence and testing practices. The document outlines five key principles of action research: 1) practical knowledge for everyday use, 2) naturalistic settings, 3) participative research, 4) change as a verb, and 5) critical reflection. It also discusses different types of action research on a spectrum from technical to critical. Students are then prompted to use the principles to evaluate sample abstracts and begin planning their own action research project.
This document provides an overview of the key functions and components of research proposals. It discusses how proposals serve as a means of communication, a plan, and a contract. Various types of proposals are described, including academic, grant, and IRB proposals. Common components like the introduction, literature review, methods, and findings sections are outlined. Tips are provided for defining substantive and epistemic research interests and refining proposals through multiple drafts. The document concludes with a proposal checklist.
PowerPoint for Elsevier and the Publisher Role in Supporting Publishing Ethic...PoojaJain26457
- Elsevier has taken steps to strengthen its policies and practices around publishing ethics over the past decade, including introducing common approaches to conflicts of interest and ethical guidelines, requiring codes to be included in electronic submissions, and launching resources like PERK and joining COPE.
- CrossCheck, Elsevier's plagiarism detection software, now screens over 400 journals and aims to ramp up screening for all submissions.
- Statistics from mid-2011 show fewer ethics cases reported in physics and chemistry journals compared to the previous year, but more retractions. Common issues include plagiarism, duplicate publication, and authorship disputes.
- Editors play a key role in ethics judgments, though determining author contributions or research fraud can
This document summarizes a workshop on advocacy for libraries. The workshop aims to explore advocacy within libraries, highlight the importance of mission and purpose, and understand how to advocate to different viewpoints. It covers defining advocacy, different philosophical approaches to social justice, and how to design an effective advocacy strategy tailored to the audience. Participants will discuss the Northern Ireland context and consider how to advocate for libraries by speaking the language of decision makers and communities.
COMM5600 Interviews & Focus groups TO SHARE (1).pptRashiRashi21
The document provides an overview of how interviews and focus groups can be used as research methods in media and communications research. It discusses how they can provide personal accounts and interpretations, understand beliefs and behaviors in context, and generate frameworks for further research. It notes the types of interviews, issues of power dynamics and identity, and practical considerations for conducting interviews and focus groups such as developing an interview guide, sampling, logistics, ethics, and analyzing the data.
This document outlines the topics and schedule for a journalism ethics class. It lists 23 student presentations on various issues in journalism ethics such as content marketing, journalism in China, reporting on death, live coverage, free speech, going undercover, the line between journalism and PR, reporters becoming part of the story, and more. It provides the instructor's contact information and outlines upcoming assignments, including student comments, a final paper, and course evaluations.
This document outlines the topics that were discussed in a journalism ethics and issues class. The instructor discussed developing social media strategies for journalists and some ethical issues they may face. Students also discussed fact-based journalism in an increasingly fact-free era, getting perspectives from Trump supporters, digging deeper into policy announcements, and alternative ways of reporting stories. The class covered emerging trends like advocacy groups doing journalism and optimism as a journalistic category. Upcoming assignments were outlined which included students presenting a three minute summary of their final paper on a journalism ethics question.
This document summarizes the key topics and assignments from a journalism ethics class. It discusses reviewing ethics guidelines from the Center for Investigative Reporting on issues like anonymous sources, misrepresentation, and undercover work. It also covers a chapter on deception in reporting. Upcoming assignments include analyzing a journalist's Twitter use and presenting a summary of each student's final ethics paper.
This document provides an overview of the remaining classes for a journalism ethics course. It includes a preview of upcoming guest speakers on ethics topics, details of quizzes and assignments. The instructor reviews answers to a recent quiz, covering topics like media ownership, digital audiences, privacy and visual journalism. Upcoming assignments involve reading articles by guest speaker Cristela Guerra on reporting ethics and analyzing a Nightline segment for its coverage of ethics issues.
This document summarizes a journalism ethics and issues class. It discusses covering diverse societies and multiculturalism, including various constituencies that supported Trump. It reviews lessons from campaign coverage, such as the need for rigorous fact-checking and more attention to Trump's supporters. The class will discuss a racial profiling case study, assignments, and have a quiz. It provides guidance on thoughtfully covering other cultures and when identifying sources by attributes like race is appropriate.
This document provides an overview of topics to be covered in a journalism ethics class, including social media ethics, personal ethics guidelines, the business of journalism, and ethical issues in the presidential campaign. It discusses emerging forms of digital advertising like sponsored content and native advertising. It also summarizes readings assigned for the next class on the Washington Post's ownership and newspapers' transition to digital.
This document summarizes the topics and assignments for a journalism ethics class. The class will include discussions of the ethics of game journalism, reporting on the Syrian conflict, and ethical issues in the 2016 US presidential campaign. It outlines readings from a textbook on dealing with sources and reviews lessons from a journalist at the Washington Post. Students are assigned to write a story that covers an event from an ethics angle and to read and discuss each other's ethics codes.
This document summarizes an ethics class discussion on journalism issues. It discusses coverage of political campaigns and ethical considerations around privacy, taste and offense. The class reviewed chapters on making decisions around privacy and taste in news coverage. They discussed the "right to be forgotten" and challenges balancing truth, privacy and minimizing harm. Assignments included reading chapters on sources and preparing for a guest speaker on investigative reporting.
This document provides an overview of the topics and activities covered in a journalism ethics and issues class. The class will discuss cultural influences on media coverage, ethical issues in presidential campaign coverage, the verification process, and chapters from the textbook on getting the story right and being fair. It also reviews a case study on how the fact-checking organization Storyful verified a viral weather video. Guidelines from the Associated Press and New York Times on language use are presented. Students will discuss checklists for accurate reporting and are assigned to read additional chapters for the next class along with submitting a personal ethics code.
Class 8 fall 2016 slides for slidesharebmitchslides
This document summarizes the key topics that were covered in a journalism ethics class, including:
1) Examples of past cases of plagiarism and fabrication by journalists such as Janet Cooke and Jayson Blair.
2) The stakeholders impacted by plagiarism and fabrication, such as audiences, subjects, and employers.
3) Types of plagiarism like appropriation and research plagiarism.
4) Ways for journalists to avoid plagiarism through proper attribution and being careful during research.
5) The consequences journalists face if caught fabricating or plagiarizing, such as losing their job and career.
This document summarizes a journalism ethics class that covered:
1. Presentations on ethical issues in reporting on Trump and Buzzfeed.
2. A discussion of next step journalism, which involves documenting stories, providing context and verification, and advancing stories through correction and analysis.
3. An assignment to read about moral decision making and comment on classmates' posts, with a quiz upcoming on class material.
This document summarizes the key topics and agenda for a class on journalism ethics taught by instructor Bill Mitchell. The class will discuss the ethics of deception in journalism, ethics of visual journalism, emerging business models, and affirmative ethics approaches. It outlines expectations for the final paper due at the end of the course focusing on a proposed reform to an area of media ethics.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
2. PERSPECTIVES ON
JOURNALISM ETHICS
JRNL 6202 SUMMER II 2015
• Instructor: Bill Mitchell
• Bmitch (at) gmail dot com
• 727-641-9407
• 13 July 2015 | Northeastern Univ.
3. BRITTANY INTRO
(ABOUT FIVE MINUTES)
3
• Who you are
• Why journalism in particular or media in general
• How you make ethical decisions
• try to sum it up in one word, and then elaborate
• Your sense of the state of media ethics
• one word followed by elaboration
• What you’re looking for from this class
• one word followed by elaboration
4. WHAT WE’LL DO TONIGHT
• Oral quiz/review of assigned readings
• Oral presentation of a couple of your blog posts
• 10 minute break (at about 7:30 p.m.)
• Review of ethical decision-making process
• Working a case
• Upcoming assignments, etc.
5. PRELIMINARY WORK ON YOUR
PERSONAL ETHICS GUIDELINES
• Which of the four theories of ethics might be a starting
point for your personal guidelines?
• Research needed on one of its historical proponents
• What principles strike you as core to your approach?
• (In-class work as a resource for ongoing assignments)
6. FOUR THEORIES OF ETHICS
• Rule-based ethics
• Immanuel Kant, 18th Century German, deontology
• Kant’s Categorical imperative: “I ought never to act
except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim
should become universal law.”
• “…an attempt to legitimize the present model of distribution,
where a minority believes that it has the right to consume in
a way which can never be universalized.”
-- Pope Francis, Encyclical on the Environment, May 2015
• “On a Supposed Right to Tell Lies from Benevolent Motives”
7. FOUR THEORIES OF ETHICS
• Ends-based ethics
• Benthem, Mill, 17th/18th Century British, teleology
• Also known as utilitarianism or consequentialism
• Mill: Greatest happiness for greatest number of people
• Clear understanding of stakeholders vital to this theory
• Flexibility both the advantage and risk of this theory
8. FOUR THEORIES OF ETHICS
• The Golden Rule
• Confucious, 6th Century BCE China, & various religions
• Confucious’ idea of Benevolence at the heart of Reciprocity:
• Respectfulness
• Tolerance
• Trustworthiness of word
• Quickness
• Generosity
• A limitation of the Golden Rule?
• With multiple stakeholders, which ones should benefit from
application of the rule?
9. FOUR THEORIES OF ETHICS
• Golden Mean
• Aristotle, 4th Century BCE Greece
• A way of applying interpretations of the Golden Rule to
multiple stakeholders
• An alternative to binary thinking
• A Third Way
• Neither socialism nor capitalism but…
• Risks?
• Another version of “socialism with a human face”
10. WHAT’S YOUR STARTING POINT?
• Five minutes thinking and writing:
• Which of the four theories – or another, if you
choose – will be your starting point?
• Rule-based (Kant)
• Ends-based (Benthem, Mill)
• Golden Rule (Confucious, et. al.)
• Golden Mean (Aristotle)
• Five minutes conversation with a partner: Help each
other sharpen your thinking
• Group discussion
11. BACK TO THE QUIZ…
• Foreman describes two main incentives for ethical
behavior:
• Moral
• Practical
12. TWO MAIN FUNCTIONS
OF NEWS ORGANIZATIONS
• To serve the public interest
• To make a profit
13. ROSENSTIEL & KOVACH ON THE
ESSENTIALS OF JOURNALISM:
• Journalism’s first obligation is to
• …the truth
• A journalist’s first loyalty is to
• …the audience
• The essence of journalism is to the discipline of
• …verification
14. EXPECTATIONS FOR
JOURNALISTS
• The Hutchins Commission was a report about what
requested by whom in what year?
• The role of journalism in public life
• Henry Luce, the founder of TIME
• Commissioned in 1942, finally delivered in 1947
15. HUTCHINS COMMISSION’S
5 RECOMMENDATIONS
• Accurate accounts of events with context that provide
meaning
• A forum for exchange of comment & criticism
• Representative portrayals of various groups in society
• Discussion of society’s goals & values ?
• Full access to government proceedings
16. SOME PERCEIVED PROS & CONS
OF ETHICS CODES (CONS FIRST)
• Perceived Con: Bans or limitations on freebies
• Perceived Con: Potential for government control
• Perceived Con: Codes as tools for plaintiffs’ lawyers
• Perceived Pro: Codes as tools for journos’ lawyers
• Perceived Pro: Enhanced credibility
• Perceived Pro: A differentiator for professional journos
17. OBSERVER VS. PARTICIPANT:
ORPHANS OF ADDICTION (1997)
• Principles in tension:
• Truth (letting the story play out) vs. minimizing harm
(protecting children from “imminent danger”)
• What alternatives might the L.A Times have considered?
• Fuller up-front discussion of possible ethical challenges
• Note to readers describing surveillance of pastor
• Lessons reflected in Nazario’s “Enrique’s Journey” (2002)
18. SOURCES OF HOSTILITY
TOWARD JOURNALISTS
• Too many mistakes (facts, grammar, spelling, punctuation)
• Bias
• Insensitivity
• Anonymity
• Sensationalism
• Influence of advertisers
19. YOUR BLOG POSTS: KEY ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES IN TENSION?
• Alex
• Audrey
• Brittany
• Cameron
• Emily
• Hongyi
• Jessica
• Kareya
• Matt
• Serefina
24. ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
POSSIBLE GUIDING PRINCIPLES
• Truth (SPJ & McBride/Rosenstiel)
• Independence (SPJ)
• Minimizing Harm SPJ)
• Accountability (SPJ)
• Transparency (McBride/Rosenstiel)
• Community (McBride/Rosenstiel)
25. AN ETHICS PROCESS
(REVISE AS YOU SEE FIT)
1. Agree on guiding principles
2. Get clear on your journalistic purpose
3. Get clear about identity of stakeholders
4. Start with your gut but don’t stop there
5. Next consider rules, laws, codes
6. Then reflect on how your principles are in tension
7. Invite disagreement and challenge
8. Consider long-term as well as immediate consequences
9. Come up with at least three alternatives
10. Explain your selection of one alternative, in writing
28. WORKING A CASE WITH THESE:
1. Agree on guiding principles
2. Get clear on your journalistic purpose
3. Get clear about identity of stakeholders
4. Start with your gut but don’t stop there
5. Next consider rules, laws, codes
6. Then reflect on how your principles are in tension
7. Invite disagreement and challenge
8. Consider long-term as well as immediate consequences
9. Come up with at least three alternatives
10. Explain your selection of one alternative, in writing
29. GRADES
• Participation: 0-5 points per class (25 total)
• Weekly posts, comments, presentations: 0-5 (25 total)
• Operation Correct That Error ( 5 total)
• Blog (10 total)
• Personal Ethics Guidelines (15 total)
• Final paper (20 total)
• Extra credit ( 8 total)
30. ASSIGNMENT: WEEKLY POST
• Weekly blog posts due Sundays at 7 a.m.
• Analyze ethical principles at stake in a case – link to
the story and specify the principles in tension!
• Explore various alternatives
• Might (or not) include links to existing media criticism
• Might (or not) include conversation or email w/ a
stakeholder, e.g. reporter, subject of coverage, etc.
• Prep to present your case orally (I’ll pick 2 each week)
31. ASSIGNMENT: WEEKLY COMMENT
• Comment on at least one of your classmate’s posts
• Due by 3 p.m. Mondays
• See if you can add to the conversation about the issue
• Less important whether you agree or disagree
• More important that you suggest a fresh look
32. ASSIGNMENT: CORRECTION
• Operation Correct That Error, first steps by 7 a.m. July 17
• Find an error, alert the publisher, get it fixed
• Describe your process with a blog post
• Particulars of what you did
• Lessons learned about accuracy & the phenomenon
of corrections in the digital era
33. ASSIGNMENT:
PERSONAL ETHICS GUIDELINES
• Personal ethics guidelines, first draft due 7 a.m. July 24
• Should include:
• Principles you’ll uphold
• Discussion of philosophical/historical roots of your
guidelines
• Process you’ll follow in ethical-decision making
• Evidence of research you’ve done on others’
guidelines in the course of developing your own
34. ASSIGNMENT: FINAL PAPER
• Make journalism better! (snapshot due 7 a.m., July 31)
• Propose a reform (or even just renewed emphasis) in an
area of media ethics you believe needs it
• Might involve anonymous sources, plagiarism,
fabrication, conflict of interest, etc. – or something much
less visible
• Document your argument with examples and include at
least a couple of interviews
• Make specific recommendations
35. YOUR BLOG
• In addition to your weekly posts, consider:
• A blog roll
• A Twitter list
• Other tools to make your blog a useful center of
conversation about journalism ethics
36. UPCOMING ASSIGNMENTS
• 7 a.m. Friday July 17: First steps on Operation Correct
That Error
• 7 a.m. Sunday July 19: Weekly post published on your
blog
• 3 p.m. Monday July 20: Comment posted to a
classmate’s blog
• 5:30 p.m. Monday July 20: Read Chapters 7, 8, 12 in
The Ethical Journalist
37. ETHICS IN THE NEWS…
• The media as Bill Cosby’s accomplice
• Meaningless numbers presented as real news
• Google’s alternative revenue stream: Contributor