This document discusses the history of interpreting and writing about American Indian history. It notes that for many years, historians largely ignored or marginalized Native peoples in their writings about U.S. history. In recent decades, American Indian scholars have brought new perspectives and methodologies to the field, incorporating ideas about culture, oral history, and removing ethnocentrism. The emergence of Native historians has necessarily brought new concerns and challenges, as the past is intimately linked to living Native communities. Properly interpreting American Indian history requires understanding both the internal histories of tribes as well as their external relations with outsiders.
Black history online reference resources secondarymediaminx
This document provides a list of online reference databases for researching African American history, the Civil War, and the Civil Rights movement. It summarizes the type of content available in each database, such as encyclopedia articles, primary sources, images, and videos. Sample searches are described to illustrate the useful resources found in the databases. Related websites focusing on topics like slavery, voting rights, civil rights leaders, and African American art are also listed.
This document summarizes an article about the Smithsonian's Festival of American Folklife from 1970-1976, which featured presentations by Native Americans about their traditions and contemporary issues. It was spearheaded by Clydia Nahwooksy and aimed to counter stereotypes by allowing Native people to interpret their own cultures. Unlike static ethnographic displays, it was a "living exhibition" that combined cultural demonstrations with discussions of issues like land claims and tribal recognition. It challenged the separation of politics and culture and provided a space for diverse Native viewpoints.
American multiculturalism emerged in 1964 with the passing of the Civil Rights Act. It began as a philosophy in the late 19th century promoting the inclusion of many ethnic and cultural groups in society. American multiculturalism includes writings from African Americans, Asian Americans, Latinos/Latinas, and Native Americans. These works often explore themes of double consciousness and the search for an inclusive American identity that acknowledges histories of oppression and cultural contributions.
The document discusses the importance of writing local history. It provides reasons for writing local history, such as helping people understand their roots and contextualizing their lives within broader historical processes. It then offers suggestions on where to find sources for local history, such as cemeteries, church records, and archives. The document also provides guidance on organizing research, including making outlines, timelines, and selecting topics. It encourages taking a nationalist perspective that places local people at the center of history rather than just subjects of colonial powers.
american multiculturalism #cultural studies
This presentation is as a part of my academic activity in sem 2 masters degree .... cultural studies paper ....
American multiculturalism is my subject so ple. have a look at this and if u have any of the doubt than contact me ... Give comment and suggestion if u aishi can... Thanks for visite .....
Edward S. Curtis was a photographer who dedicated his life to documenting the lives and cultures of Native American tribes in the early 20th century. He took over 40,000 photographs and recorded thousands of hours of sounds over 30 years of extensive travel. His work was published in a 20 volume set called The North American Indian. While his work brought attention to Native American cultures, some criticize that he staged scenes and encouraged tribes to perform outdated rituals. His work was both praised for its documentation but also criticized for potentially misrepresenting Native people and cultures.
This is a presentation I created and gave a few years back at DEOMI. It represents the ethnic observances identified and supported by the military/DoD.
Dr. Willis Nathaniel Huggins (1886-1941): Historian, Activist, and Community ...RBG Communiversity
This document provides biographical information about Dr. Willis Nathaniel Huggins, an African American historian, activist, and community mentor in Harlem in the early 20th century. It discusses his early life and education in Alabama and Washington D.C. It then describes his work as a teacher and activist in Alabama, Chicago, and New York City, where he founded the Blyden Society and Harlem History Club to educate students in Black history. The document also discusses his connections to other prominent Black intellectuals of the time and his mysterious death in 1941, which was ruled a suicide but some believed was foul play.
Black history online reference resources secondarymediaminx
This document provides a list of online reference databases for researching African American history, the Civil War, and the Civil Rights movement. It summarizes the type of content available in each database, such as encyclopedia articles, primary sources, images, and videos. Sample searches are described to illustrate the useful resources found in the databases. Related websites focusing on topics like slavery, voting rights, civil rights leaders, and African American art are also listed.
This document summarizes an article about the Smithsonian's Festival of American Folklife from 1970-1976, which featured presentations by Native Americans about their traditions and contemporary issues. It was spearheaded by Clydia Nahwooksy and aimed to counter stereotypes by allowing Native people to interpret their own cultures. Unlike static ethnographic displays, it was a "living exhibition" that combined cultural demonstrations with discussions of issues like land claims and tribal recognition. It challenged the separation of politics and culture and provided a space for diverse Native viewpoints.
American multiculturalism emerged in 1964 with the passing of the Civil Rights Act. It began as a philosophy in the late 19th century promoting the inclusion of many ethnic and cultural groups in society. American multiculturalism includes writings from African Americans, Asian Americans, Latinos/Latinas, and Native Americans. These works often explore themes of double consciousness and the search for an inclusive American identity that acknowledges histories of oppression and cultural contributions.
The document discusses the importance of writing local history. It provides reasons for writing local history, such as helping people understand their roots and contextualizing their lives within broader historical processes. It then offers suggestions on where to find sources for local history, such as cemeteries, church records, and archives. The document also provides guidance on organizing research, including making outlines, timelines, and selecting topics. It encourages taking a nationalist perspective that places local people at the center of history rather than just subjects of colonial powers.
american multiculturalism #cultural studies
This presentation is as a part of my academic activity in sem 2 masters degree .... cultural studies paper ....
American multiculturalism is my subject so ple. have a look at this and if u have any of the doubt than contact me ... Give comment and suggestion if u aishi can... Thanks for visite .....
Edward S. Curtis was a photographer who dedicated his life to documenting the lives and cultures of Native American tribes in the early 20th century. He took over 40,000 photographs and recorded thousands of hours of sounds over 30 years of extensive travel. His work was published in a 20 volume set called The North American Indian. While his work brought attention to Native American cultures, some criticize that he staged scenes and encouraged tribes to perform outdated rituals. His work was both praised for its documentation but also criticized for potentially misrepresenting Native people and cultures.
This is a presentation I created and gave a few years back at DEOMI. It represents the ethnic observances identified and supported by the military/DoD.
Dr. Willis Nathaniel Huggins (1886-1941): Historian, Activist, and Community ...RBG Communiversity
This document provides biographical information about Dr. Willis Nathaniel Huggins, an African American historian, activist, and community mentor in Harlem in the early 20th century. It discusses his early life and education in Alabama and Washington D.C. It then describes his work as a teacher and activist in Alabama, Chicago, and New York City, where he founded the Blyden Society and Harlem History Club to educate students in Black history. The document also discusses his connections to other prominent Black intellectuals of the time and his mysterious death in 1941, which was ruled a suicide but some believed was foul play.
The collection of materials about Native Americans at East Jackson Elementary School is currently small and undeveloped. It consists only of a few print books that are dispersed throughout the media center and do not stimulate student interest. An evaluation found that fiction and non-fiction book numbers need to be increased to provide a greater range of topics, styles, and subjects. Interactive materials such as audio CDs, video DVDs, and ebooks also need to be added to supplement the print materials. A budget of $3,993.56 has been proposed to improve the collection.
THE CHALLEGES OF PAN-AFRICANISM FROM W.E.B DUBOIS TO KWAME NKRUMAHAJHSSR Journal
Abstract: This article deals with the issue of Pan Africanism from America, via Europe, until Africa. Our goal
is to show how the challenges of Pan-Africanism started in America with activities of Sylvester W.E.B Dubois
until Kwame Nkrumah in Africa. Despite theclaimings for their cultural identities, their origins, and different
activities of Sylvester W.E.B Dubois, Afro-American remain under the white men domination, not only in the
socio-cultural field, but also in the socio-political even economic as well. So more than 60 century ago, the
whole cultural, socio-politics, even the economic life in America was totally belonging to the white men. So,
through socio historical approach, we have noticed that the ideas of the African Unity resulted from the different
activities of Pan-Africanism by Silvester W.E.B Dubois in America, via Europ and finally in Africa with
Kwame Nkrumah.
American multiculturalism emerged in 1964 with the passing of the Civil Rights Act. It began as a philosophy movement in Europe and the US in the late 19th century. American multiculturalism encompasses the literature and writings of various ethnic groups in the US, including African American writers, Latina/o writers, Asian American writers, and American Indian literature. It values maintaining separate cultural identities within a diverse society, represented by the "salad bowl" theory, rather than full assimilation under the "melting pot" theory.
Multicultural Literature: Overview and AssignmentK.C. Boyd
The document discusses multicultural literature and its importance in education. It defines multicultural literature as works that portray non-white racial and ethnic groups in the US. It highlights four major ethnic groups represented in multicultural literature and explains how such works can enhance understanding of diversity, provide varied perspectives, and affirm cultural identities for minority students. The document also provides guidance on evaluating the cultural authenticity of multicultural literature.
This document provides an overview of multiculturalism in the United States. It discusses how the US has become a highly diverse nation through immigration from many parts of the world. It also examines the concepts of the "melting pot" and "salad bowl" in describing cultural diversity in American society. The document then profiles the various ethnic and racial groups that comprise the population of the US, including Native Americans, European colonists, African Americans, Asian Americans, Latin Americans, and others.
This document provides an overview of American multiculturalism. It discusses how multiculturalism arose in the US with the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It acknowledges the influence of pragmatism in the late 19th century. It then briefly outlines some of the key writers and works that represent the experiences and perspectives of African Americans, Latina/o Americans, Native Americans, and Asian Americans in the development of multiculturalism in America.
The document discusses different types of culture, including British cultural materialism, American multiculturalism, and Asian American writers. British cultural materialism began in the 1950s and examines how culture reproduces social relations. American multiculturalism emerged in the 1960s to recognize distinct immigrant identities and celebrate racial/ethnic heritages. It includes African American, Latinx, American Indian, and Asian American writers.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online
This document provides an overview of American multiculturalism. It begins by defining culture and noting that culture includes systems of knowledge, learned social behaviors, and symbolic communication shared by a group. It then states that multiculturalism refers to the coexistence of diverse cultures as manifested through behaviors, assumptions, communication styles, and patterns of thinking. The document explains that American multiculturalism emerged in the 1960s with the passing of civil rights laws. It then provides brief summaries of key African American, Latina/o, and American Indian writers that have contributed to the development of multicultural literature in America.
This course examines the social, economic, and political development of America through an interdisciplinary study of literature, culture, and history. It analyzes how conflict and cooperation among groups shaped American national identity and citizenship over time. Key topics include the cultural formations that emerged from interactions between Native Americans, Anglo-Americans, and Mexican Americans; representations of "the American experience" in public policy, literature, film, and academia; and the rise of industry, capitalism, and economic integration from the colonial period to the 21st century. The goal is to understand the interplay between diverse populations, institutions, and economic forces in the development of North America and the business of America.
This document summarizes key events and writers in the development of American multiculturalism. It discusses the Watts race riots in 1965 and civil rights legislation passed in the 1960s. It then profiles influential African American, Latina/o, Native American, and Asian American writers who contributed to the emergence of ethnic literature and cultural studies in the United States. These include Ralph Ellison, Toni Morrison, Sandra Cisneros, M. Scott Momaday, Amy Tan, and others. The document examines the representation of different racial and ethnic groups in American arts and media over the 20th century.
In his book Facing East from Indian Country, Daniel Richter examines the colonization of America through the perspective of Native Americans. He shows that Native American civilizations had complex societies that existed for thousands of years before European arrival, yet their history has largely been left out of accounts of colonization. Richter uses sources like translations of Native languages to understand their cultural differences with colonists, such as incorporating gift-giving into treaties. These differences led to misunderstandings and conflict as colonists sought to dominate Native lands and ways of life. By facing east from the Native viewpoint, Richter provides a more comprehensive telling of America's history.
This is the talk I gave to the Tar River Reading Council of Pitt County, NC, about multicultural children's literature. The main idea is that all texts send messages, so as teachers we should be sure those messages are as inclusive as possible of our students and our world. Using Rudine Sims Bishop's definition of multicultural children's literature and her concept of how books can be both windows into the lives of others and mirrors to reflect back our own stories, I share information, recommendations, and arts-based instructional approaches with multicultural children's literature that teachers can use in their classrooms.
This document discusses multicultural literature and its importance. It defines multicultural literature as books about the experiences of people from different cultures, including mainstream cultures. It notes that multicultural literature can help reduce prejudice by fostering understanding of other cultures and bringing their histories and traditions to life. It also acknowledges that multicultural literature develops cultural pride while also finding common ground between all people. The document outlines some types of multicultural literature and issues to consider when selecting books, such as avoiding stereotypes and ensuring authentic perspectives.
The document discusses the history and definitions of multiculturalism and cultural studies in America. It notes that cultural studies draws from fields like Marxism, feminism, and postcolonial studies. The text specifically examines American multiculturalism, which arose from civil rights movements in the 1960s. It also discusses African American literature, which began with slave narratives and has gained widespread recognition since the 1970s, as well as Native American oral traditions and contemporary literature written in English.
A Socio-Cultural Approach To The Native American Experience Sherman Alexie S...Vicki Cristol
This document provides a summary of a thesis on Sherman Alexie's perspective on the Native American experience as portrayed in his short story collection Ten Little Indians. The introduction gives context on stereotypes of Native Americans and the need to understand their true history and contemporary realities. The first chapter provides a brief history of Native Americans in North America from early European contact to the 20th century, covering relocation programs, occupations of Alcatraz, and issues of reparations. The second chapter will analyze Alexie's story "The Search Engine" and how it reflects topics like reservation life, tribalism, and the cultural clash Native Americans experience.
This document provides an abstract for a paper analyzing Arthur Kopit's play "Indians" through an ethnohistorical lens. The abstract discusses how Kopit uses some ethnohistorical methodologies to dramatize Native American history and experiences with colonization in the US in the late 19th century without claiming to present a strictly factual version of events. It also addresses how the play comments on the American hero myth and employs humor and fictionalization to avoid creating a documentary-style retelling of history.
Jane Johnston Schoolcraft Writing Within The Middle Groundhgozen
Jane Johnston Schoolcraft was a mixed Ojibwe-Irish writer in the early 19th century. She served as an informant for her husband Henry Rowe Schoolcraft's ethnographic work, though her own contributions were often not credited. Her writing represented Ojibwe culture to Euroamerican audiences using the literary forms of Romantic poetry and folktales. Her work engaged with colonial representations of indigenous peoples on their own terms, presenting her experiences of Ojibwe culture from her own perspective as a native speaker.
The document summarizes five types of cultural studies: (1) British Cultural Materialism, (2) New Historicism, (3) American Multiculturalism including African American, Latina/o, American Indian, and Asian American writers, (4) Postmodernism and Popular Culture, and (5) Postcolonial Studies. It provides details on the key ideas and scholars associated with each type of cultural studies.
This document provides an overview of American Indian literature. It discusses the oral tradition of Native Americans and how their traditions were impacted by European colonization. It then summarizes some of the key early Native American authors who wrote about native rights and culture from the 19th to early 20th centuries such as Samson Occom, Yellow Bird, and Simon Pokagnon. The document notes that the late 1960s saw a renaissance in Native American fiction and poetry sparked by writers like N. Scott Momaday and James Welch. It discusses how authors in the 1970s like Louise Erdrich became major literary figures, helping give voice to indigenous histories and cultures.
The collection of materials about Native Americans at East Jackson Elementary School is currently small and undeveloped. It consists only of a few print books that are dispersed throughout the media center and do not stimulate student interest. An evaluation found that fiction and non-fiction book numbers need to be increased to provide a greater range of topics, styles, and subjects. Interactive materials such as audio CDs, video DVDs, and ebooks also need to be added to supplement the print materials. A budget of $3,993.56 has been proposed to improve the collection.
THE CHALLEGES OF PAN-AFRICANISM FROM W.E.B DUBOIS TO KWAME NKRUMAHAJHSSR Journal
Abstract: This article deals with the issue of Pan Africanism from America, via Europe, until Africa. Our goal
is to show how the challenges of Pan-Africanism started in America with activities of Sylvester W.E.B Dubois
until Kwame Nkrumah in Africa. Despite theclaimings for their cultural identities, their origins, and different
activities of Sylvester W.E.B Dubois, Afro-American remain under the white men domination, not only in the
socio-cultural field, but also in the socio-political even economic as well. So more than 60 century ago, the
whole cultural, socio-politics, even the economic life in America was totally belonging to the white men. So,
through socio historical approach, we have noticed that the ideas of the African Unity resulted from the different
activities of Pan-Africanism by Silvester W.E.B Dubois in America, via Europ and finally in Africa with
Kwame Nkrumah.
American multiculturalism emerged in 1964 with the passing of the Civil Rights Act. It began as a philosophy movement in Europe and the US in the late 19th century. American multiculturalism encompasses the literature and writings of various ethnic groups in the US, including African American writers, Latina/o writers, Asian American writers, and American Indian literature. It values maintaining separate cultural identities within a diverse society, represented by the "salad bowl" theory, rather than full assimilation under the "melting pot" theory.
Multicultural Literature: Overview and AssignmentK.C. Boyd
The document discusses multicultural literature and its importance in education. It defines multicultural literature as works that portray non-white racial and ethnic groups in the US. It highlights four major ethnic groups represented in multicultural literature and explains how such works can enhance understanding of diversity, provide varied perspectives, and affirm cultural identities for minority students. The document also provides guidance on evaluating the cultural authenticity of multicultural literature.
This document provides an overview of multiculturalism in the United States. It discusses how the US has become a highly diverse nation through immigration from many parts of the world. It also examines the concepts of the "melting pot" and "salad bowl" in describing cultural diversity in American society. The document then profiles the various ethnic and racial groups that comprise the population of the US, including Native Americans, European colonists, African Americans, Asian Americans, Latin Americans, and others.
This document provides an overview of American multiculturalism. It discusses how multiculturalism arose in the US with the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It acknowledges the influence of pragmatism in the late 19th century. It then briefly outlines some of the key writers and works that represent the experiences and perspectives of African Americans, Latina/o Americans, Native Americans, and Asian Americans in the development of multiculturalism in America.
The document discusses different types of culture, including British cultural materialism, American multiculturalism, and Asian American writers. British cultural materialism began in the 1950s and examines how culture reproduces social relations. American multiculturalism emerged in the 1960s to recognize distinct immigrant identities and celebrate racial/ethnic heritages. It includes African American, Latinx, American Indian, and Asian American writers.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online
This document provides an overview of American multiculturalism. It begins by defining culture and noting that culture includes systems of knowledge, learned social behaviors, and symbolic communication shared by a group. It then states that multiculturalism refers to the coexistence of diverse cultures as manifested through behaviors, assumptions, communication styles, and patterns of thinking. The document explains that American multiculturalism emerged in the 1960s with the passing of civil rights laws. It then provides brief summaries of key African American, Latina/o, and American Indian writers that have contributed to the development of multicultural literature in America.
This course examines the social, economic, and political development of America through an interdisciplinary study of literature, culture, and history. It analyzes how conflict and cooperation among groups shaped American national identity and citizenship over time. Key topics include the cultural formations that emerged from interactions between Native Americans, Anglo-Americans, and Mexican Americans; representations of "the American experience" in public policy, literature, film, and academia; and the rise of industry, capitalism, and economic integration from the colonial period to the 21st century. The goal is to understand the interplay between diverse populations, institutions, and economic forces in the development of North America and the business of America.
This document summarizes key events and writers in the development of American multiculturalism. It discusses the Watts race riots in 1965 and civil rights legislation passed in the 1960s. It then profiles influential African American, Latina/o, Native American, and Asian American writers who contributed to the emergence of ethnic literature and cultural studies in the United States. These include Ralph Ellison, Toni Morrison, Sandra Cisneros, M. Scott Momaday, Amy Tan, and others. The document examines the representation of different racial and ethnic groups in American arts and media over the 20th century.
In his book Facing East from Indian Country, Daniel Richter examines the colonization of America through the perspective of Native Americans. He shows that Native American civilizations had complex societies that existed for thousands of years before European arrival, yet their history has largely been left out of accounts of colonization. Richter uses sources like translations of Native languages to understand their cultural differences with colonists, such as incorporating gift-giving into treaties. These differences led to misunderstandings and conflict as colonists sought to dominate Native lands and ways of life. By facing east from the Native viewpoint, Richter provides a more comprehensive telling of America's history.
This is the talk I gave to the Tar River Reading Council of Pitt County, NC, about multicultural children's literature. The main idea is that all texts send messages, so as teachers we should be sure those messages are as inclusive as possible of our students and our world. Using Rudine Sims Bishop's definition of multicultural children's literature and her concept of how books can be both windows into the lives of others and mirrors to reflect back our own stories, I share information, recommendations, and arts-based instructional approaches with multicultural children's literature that teachers can use in their classrooms.
This document discusses multicultural literature and its importance. It defines multicultural literature as books about the experiences of people from different cultures, including mainstream cultures. It notes that multicultural literature can help reduce prejudice by fostering understanding of other cultures and bringing their histories and traditions to life. It also acknowledges that multicultural literature develops cultural pride while also finding common ground between all people. The document outlines some types of multicultural literature and issues to consider when selecting books, such as avoiding stereotypes and ensuring authentic perspectives.
The document discusses the history and definitions of multiculturalism and cultural studies in America. It notes that cultural studies draws from fields like Marxism, feminism, and postcolonial studies. The text specifically examines American multiculturalism, which arose from civil rights movements in the 1960s. It also discusses African American literature, which began with slave narratives and has gained widespread recognition since the 1970s, as well as Native American oral traditions and contemporary literature written in English.
A Socio-Cultural Approach To The Native American Experience Sherman Alexie S...Vicki Cristol
This document provides a summary of a thesis on Sherman Alexie's perspective on the Native American experience as portrayed in his short story collection Ten Little Indians. The introduction gives context on stereotypes of Native Americans and the need to understand their true history and contemporary realities. The first chapter provides a brief history of Native Americans in North America from early European contact to the 20th century, covering relocation programs, occupations of Alcatraz, and issues of reparations. The second chapter will analyze Alexie's story "The Search Engine" and how it reflects topics like reservation life, tribalism, and the cultural clash Native Americans experience.
This document provides an abstract for a paper analyzing Arthur Kopit's play "Indians" through an ethnohistorical lens. The abstract discusses how Kopit uses some ethnohistorical methodologies to dramatize Native American history and experiences with colonization in the US in the late 19th century without claiming to present a strictly factual version of events. It also addresses how the play comments on the American hero myth and employs humor and fictionalization to avoid creating a documentary-style retelling of history.
Jane Johnston Schoolcraft Writing Within The Middle Groundhgozen
Jane Johnston Schoolcraft was a mixed Ojibwe-Irish writer in the early 19th century. She served as an informant for her husband Henry Rowe Schoolcraft's ethnographic work, though her own contributions were often not credited. Her writing represented Ojibwe culture to Euroamerican audiences using the literary forms of Romantic poetry and folktales. Her work engaged with colonial representations of indigenous peoples on their own terms, presenting her experiences of Ojibwe culture from her own perspective as a native speaker.
The document summarizes five types of cultural studies: (1) British Cultural Materialism, (2) New Historicism, (3) American Multiculturalism including African American, Latina/o, American Indian, and Asian American writers, (4) Postmodernism and Popular Culture, and (5) Postcolonial Studies. It provides details on the key ideas and scholars associated with each type of cultural studies.
This document provides an overview of American Indian literature. It discusses the oral tradition of Native Americans and how their traditions were impacted by European colonization. It then summarizes some of the key early Native American authors who wrote about native rights and culture from the 19th to early 20th centuries such as Samson Occom, Yellow Bird, and Simon Pokagnon. The document notes that the late 1960s saw a renaissance in Native American fiction and poetry sparked by writers like N. Scott Momaday and James Welch. It discusses how authors in the 1970s like Louise Erdrich became major literary figures, helping give voice to indigenous histories and cultures.
The document summarizes African American literature during the Reconstruction era (1865-1877) after the Civil War and abolition of slavery. Key writers during this period included Booker T. Washington, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, W.E.B. Du Bois, James Weldon Johnson, and Paul Laurence Dunbar. African American writers used literature to shape the social, political, and spiritual hopes of African Americans and push back against perceptions that they were intellectually or creatively incapable. Literature from this era included slave narratives, autobiographies, biographies, and works that documented the black experience.
Surname 2NameCourseDate1. What is your earliest memory.docxmabelf3
Surname: 2
Name:
Course:
Date:
1. What is your earliest memory of the American West?
One of the most outstanding memories about the American West was about the completion of the railroads to the following civil war which opened up a vast number of places to settlement and economic development. During that time, white settlers from the East flocked into Mississippi for mining activities, farming, as well as ranching. Besides, African-Americans settlers also came into the West emanating from the Deep South who were motivated by the promoters of all-black Western towns that prosperity could be found there (White, 2015). Also, diversity was intensified by the Chinese railroad workers within the region’s population. It then led the settlement from the East turn to Great Plains were the herds of Americans bison in the area were virtually omitted from the place as farmers plowed the area as well as the growth of cattle industry as the railroad provided a practical means for getting the cattle to market.
2. From what sources did you learn about the West? This could be anything from school to stories to TV shows to personal experience.
I was able to learn about the American West from various publications and articles available in the libraries of the institution as well as commercial libraries. Besides, learning about the West was made simpler by the availability of a wide range of online materials of study related to the topic. The wide range of online source equips one with the appropriate information about the West in clear details. Besides, the comparison of these sources enables one to acquire all the relevant data about the West and its historical background with regard to the American identity. Again, West is vastly presented in films and TV shows were characters have enacted the events of the period.
3. As you think about your perception of the American West, what individuals populate that space? What kinds of events take place? Set the scene of your imagined American West.
Imaginatively, I tend to perceive that the American West is populated by some widely but inter-related individuals which would be as a result of the different interaction of the different individuals who migrated into the place. Having different races within the same geographical setting means that mixed social, economic and political events will be carried such as the rise of support groups including women empowerment associations. However, this factor leads to the eruption of newly invented activities which would be suitable for all the participants in the region which would traverse across all the races in the West. Therefore, it means that new cultures and events will be generated over time in the American West due to the socialization with variant individuals from different races and ethnic groups.
4. After you’ve drafted your post, read through it and identify at least two images, pictures, TV/movie clips, or soundtracks that embody your ideas of the American Wes.
This document is an order form and description for the book "A Field of Their Own: Women and American Indian History, 1830–1941" by John M. Rhea. It summarizes that the book reveals how a small group of remarkable women in the late 19th and early 20th centuries established American Indian history as a specialized field of study. It describes some of the pioneering women highlighted in the book, from Helen Hunt Jackson to Angie Debo, who played crucial roles in shaping understandings of American Indian history through their research and publications. The book also chronicles indigenous women's struggle to transform how historians portrayed Native American peoples and their pasts.
This document provides an overview of contemporary American literature. It notes that American literature has become very diverse, democratic, and heterogeneous, reflecting the diversity of the American population and influences from global writers. Various genres have flourished, including short stories, novels, plays, creative non-fiction, and memoirs. Postmodern literature questions traditional structures and explores themes from popular culture. Regional literature also thrives, drawing from the traditions and landscapes of the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, South, Midwest, and West. Overall, American literature today is vibrant and evolving.
This document provides an overview of African American literature from its origins in slave narratives to its development as a protest literature. It discusses how slave narratives were important as the first writings by former slaves that documented the brutal realities of slavery. It also examines Frederick Douglass' influential narrative as an example, noting how his first-hand account was instrumental in informing white readers and advancing the abolitionist cause. The document traces how African American literature emerged out of the struggle for identity and equality during the era of Jim Crow laws and segregation.
American writers have a long and illustrious with some.docxwrite12
American literature has evolved through four periods: realism, naturalism, modernism, and postmodernism. Writers during each period displayed certain defining characteristics. Realism writers like Mark Twain and Booker T. Washington wrote about accurate representations of American life and social issues like racism. Naturalist writers such as Edith Wharton and Jack London were influenced by Darwin and wrote about environmental and hereditary determinism. Modernist writers experimented with form and perspective and addressed themes like the burden of history. Postmodern writers depicted contemporary issues and technologies and expressed confusion about social changes through works like Allen Ginsberg's poem "Howl."
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online
This document provides background on the native peoples inhabiting the Americas at the time of European contact. It describes the diversity of tribes and their varying economic systems, including hunter-gatherers, fishers, hunters, and sedentary farmers. The most advanced civilizations were the Aztecs and Incas, who had empires resembling European feudal systems. However, native Americans lacked immunity to Eurasian diseases and technology like iron, putting them at a disadvantage against European invaders. While many natives were conquered, some tribes maintained power by playing European nations against each other or adopting European warfare tactics. Overall, European domination was uneven and contact did not erase all native culture and power.
King Afonso I of Kongo and Emperor Qianlong of China both addressed issues involving trade with Western nations in the 15th-17th centuries. Afonso I wrote to Portugal about limiting the slave trade, which undermined his authority. Qianlong wrote to England establishing rules for trade at Guangzhou only. Both leaders provided important goods and sought to reform trade relations by imposing restrictions. The interview discusses two sisters who attended Notre Dame College in the mid-20th century, became nuns, and had careers in education. They grew up on a farm in Ohio and commented on farm life and chores.
Casteneda Historiogrpahy Of Women Mexican Californialafenix
This article analyzes how early histories of frontier California portrayed Spanish-Mexican women through the lens of contemporary racial, gender, and cultural biases. Popular histories from the late 19th century reflected ideologies that viewed Mexicans as racially and culturally inferior and women as sexually inferior. These histories propagated stereotypes of Spanish-Mexican women that portrayed them in a negative light and judged their behaviors based on Anglo-American gender norms. More recent scholarship has challenged these earlier perspectives but has yet to develop a fully integrated interpretation of the roles of sex, gender, race and culture.
98 Ibid., 227.99 Prior to the Supreme Court decision, California.docxblondellchancy
98 Ibid., 227.
99 Prior to the Supreme Court decision, California had plugged the contracting loophole to restrict the use of contracts. Ibid., 231-32.
100 Ibid., 231.
101 Ibid., 233.
102 Ibid., 233-34.
103 Ibid., 235.
104 Ibid., 241—43.
105 Yung, Chang, and Lai, Chinese American Voices, 76.
106 Ibid.
107 Ibid., 78.
108 Rick Baldoz, The Third Asiatic Invasion: Empire and Migration in Filipino America, 1898-1946 (New York: New York University Press, 2011), 140.
5就幼家屜/ A N姐。F揚力 久(也肉f孙/色
174 Response and Resistance
Americanization, Modernity, and the Second Generation through the 1930s
In 1926, the journal Survey Graphic featured the autobiography of Kazuo Kawai, a young Japanese American who had immigrated to the United States at the age of six. Although not native-born, he was presented as an exemplar of the second-generation experience. Kawai said that life as an Am^icanized person ofjapanese ancestry had been difficult and confusing. During his high school years, he identified with American culture and did not connect with 5 classmates whom he viewed as overly ’Japanesy" In college, however, where he was no -longer surrounded by other Japanese Americans, he grew increasingly self-conscious about &his racial "otherness.” "[For] the first time," said Kawai:
I felt myself becoming identified with Japan, and began to realize that I was Japanese ...What would I be able to do in Japan?... I couldn't speak the language except for a silly baby-talk ... I didn't know any of the customs or traditions of Japan/'1 He continued, “Where did I belong?... in language, in thought, in ideals, in custom, in everything, I was American. But America wouldn't have me... Once I was American, but America made a foreigner out of me—Not a Japanese, but a foreigner—a foreigner to any country for I am just as much a foreigner to Japan as to America.2
Such sentiments were common among young Asian Americans―both U.S. and foreign ,born~during the early twentieth century For the most part, they considered themselves American, but in the course of their lives, came to realize that their ethnic backgrounds and /. "OrientaT faces impeded their full belonging in American society
This chapter examines the Eves of Asian Americans against the backdrop of modernity U jn the early twentieth century with a focus on issues such as education, work, politics, racism, / popular culture, and generational relations. It pays particular attention to young Asian Americans, mainly second-generation Japanese Americans (Nisei) and Chinese Americans, whose experiences have been the most widely documented, although the lives of U.S.-born and /or young Filipinos, Koreans, South Asians, and Asian Americans of mixed parentage will also be considered. The chapter will discuss the pressures and challenges that young 'Asian Americans faced, whether from their own families and ethnic communities or the
# Modernity and the Second Generation Modernity and the Second Generation 177
larger society ...
Second Amendement And International Contextlafenix
This article argues that the debate around the meaning of the Second Amendment has lacked important historical context. Specifically, it notes that the debate in Scotland around having local militias, despite opposition from the British Parliament, helped inform the American debate around state militias. The article seeks to provide this missing transatlantic context in order to better understand the historical meaning of the right to bear arms as it was understood in the late 18th century on both sides of the Atlantic. It does not take a position on the modern interpretation of the Second Amendment but aims to reconstruct the political and legal thinking of the time period to inform the originalist debate.
This document provides a summary of Chapter 3 from the textbook. It discusses the growing political divisions in the early 1790s between Alexander Hamilton and James Madison over financial policy, demonstrating Americans sharply disagreed over the powers of the new federal government. Events at home and abroad, like the French Revolution and Jay Treaty, further divided the population. Societies opposing Washington's administration organized across the country. Tensions escalated with the Whiskey Rebellion and repressive Alien and Sedition Acts, bringing the country close to civil war, but ultimately led to Thomas Jefferson's election in 1800.
This document provides background on John and Thomasine Winthrop, a Puritan couple who lived in Suffolk County, England in the early 1600s. It describes their lives managing Groton Manor, where John was born and raised. It details their Puritan faith, marriage, and family life. It then describes Thomasine's death in childbirth in 1616, which John recorded in great detail, providing insight into their relationship and Puritan beliefs. The document establishes the context of their lives in rural 17th century England to understand Thomasine's death.
This document discusses the history of interpreting and writing about American Indian history. It notes that for many years, historians largely ignored or marginalized Native peoples in their writings about U.S. history. In recent decades, there has been a growing recognition of the need to incorporate Indigenous perspectives and include Native Americans as central rather than peripheral figures. However, writing Indian history presents challenges due to lack of Native literacy historically and because most scholars of Indian history are non-Native. The document examines methodological issues and debates surrounding the interpretation and teaching of American Indian history.
The document summarizes three Native American oral histories describing the origins of the world:
1) A Maidu account where Earth Initiate and Turtle work together to create dry land, the sun, moon, stars, trees and animals. Earth Initiate then creates the first man and woman.
2) A Skagit belief where Raven, Mink and Coyote help the Creator plan rivers and forests, and decide that humans will only live briefly before returning to the earth and spirit world.
3) It is said that everyone originally spoke the same Skagit language, but a flood occurred after people began speaking to trees, covering everything but two mountains.
1) The document discusses debates around the new US Constitution proposed in 1787, including arguments made by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison.
2) Hamilton advocated for a strong federal government with significant powers over the states. Madison argued in Federalist No. 10 that the new Constitution would help control the negative effects of factions by creating a large republic with representation.
3) The debates touched on issues of democracy, federalism, and the balance of power between national and state governments under the new system.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Chap 1 Indian
1. CHAPTER
I
Interpreting the Indian Past
<F
Today, most thoughtful people would think that the idea of American history
without American Indians was an absurdity. Yet for generations historians of the
United States wrote the nation's stlry as if Indians did not exist, or at best historians
marginalized native people as bit players in the great national drama. In U.S. his- /
tory textbooks Indians emerged only in time to be swept aside by westering white l/
Americans. In the 1960s, the civil rights movement and the growth of politicaly/
activism among people of color, ethnic groups, and women resulted in a challenge to
exclusively Anglocentric history. Yet the writing of Indian history is no simple matter.
Until the twentieth century, few Indians were literate, so the record of their activities
was based primarily on documenls that whlte observers prod4cut. Indians remem-
bered theii past, but in rhe form Mne American
Indian experience often find that their work about the past is important to Indians'
aspirations for the future. Consequently, the field is sometimes politically charged
in ways that other historical subjects are not. Until recently, there were no Indian
historians in academe, and Indian views were only indirectly represented. In the
past few decades, this situation has improved so that Indian voices are increasingly
heard in classrooms and textbooks, but native historians are still a minority even in
the field of lndian history. This chapter poses questions about the state of Indian
history and the special responsibilities of historians working in this field.
($ESSATS
The emergence of native scholars has necessarily brought new concerns to the attention
of historians. For Indian historians, the past is palpably linked to living people, places,
and problems with which they are intimately familiar. Professor Donald L. Fixico, an
historian of Creek, Seminole, Sac and Fox, and Shawnee heritage at the University of
Kansas, challenges historians to augment their research techniques and analytical con-
ceptions with research methods and ideas that are F.e!lsf.sutgl..1!l Indian history. While
incorporating ideas about culture and oral history, historians must consciously remove
ethnocentrism from their work, a process that Professor Fixico regards as a moral im-
perative. Professor Richard White of Stanford University explains the methodological
diffrculties of studying Indian history. He begins by questioning the.assumj[gs that
historians work from. Professor White is particularly concerned with the intersection
of Indian history and environmental history, but this essay and the questions it raises are
2. o,-$/il$/ Interpreting the Indian Pdst
inherent in teaching and writing about Native American history. On the other side of
this issue, some American Indians feel that the writing of American Indian history,
mostly by non-Indians, is merely another example of the exploitative and unfair
treatment of Indian people. .., I'C,J ln
An interesting irony has occurred in theElstorlsgaphyhf the American expe-
rience. For at least a century, scholars, writers, and historians have neglected Native
Americans in writing the history of America. Different schools of thought like the
Germ theory and Turner thesis have encouraged historians to ignore the original
inhabitants of the entire western hemisphere. Why did this happen, if a scholar's
professional responsibility is to be objective in researching historical topics? These
approaches described the "white experience." as-illndir$ did not exist. To write a
I
history of the Anglo-American experience i@fggrbut to claim that it repre- |
sents the entire history of the American experience is a gross mistake.
Historians, in particular, wrote Indians out of their textbooks for whatever t r- I
insecure reasons of justifying the past actions of America's heroes, racial bigotry ,
,7 ,rf U:fe&*-
or white guilt. By ignoring the dark episodes of the destruction of Indians and their r'lr ' - ll
cultures, historians in effect denied that these ever happened. Nonetheless non-
Indians have had to face the issue that American Indians, indeed, have existed in
the Americas well before the accidental arrival of Columbus. and that Native
Americans are a vital palt of the history of this country. Hence, the writing of
American Indian history emerged as a body of literature in the early decades of the
twentieth century, although historians continued to vilify Indians as "savages" and
"devilish heathens" that a glorified United States had to destroy, exalting a faise
white supremacy over all minority races in this country. ,^,
Whether racially prejudiced or guiJtnd-d.en*patronizing, paternalistic, or{o-
,,li -l.1
J4nlie-lndian history mainly has been perceived from a white perspective. based
on the idea that "the conquerors write the history." More than 30,000 manuscripts
have been published about American Indians, and more than 90 percent of that
literature has been written by non-Indians. To illustrate this point further, a similar
percentage of these non-Indian historians have written about writing or studying
American Indian history.
The point here is that non-Indian scholars have sought to define the param-
eters of the field of American lndian history. They have attempted to determine its
forms of evidence only as wlitten accounts, professed limited theories, and de-
vised methodologies from a non-Indian tradition. European explorers and military
officers recorded accounts of their contacts with Amelican Indians. During the
British colonization in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, newspapers used
negative reports about Indians to sell newspapers. Eager novelists picked up their
poisoned pens to embellish on any Indian resistance to intrigue readers with
horrific atrocities. In the 1880s, ethnographers recorded notes, wrote articles, and
drafted manuscripts describing Indians and their cultures. More ethnographers
and anthropologists followed in the late 1880s in desperate efforts to study Native
American cultures. These were believed to be disappearing with the buffalo, as
the Indian population in the United States declined to 243,000. Careless historians
followed ethnographers and anthropologists as a part of the academic community
that wrote imbalanced articles and books about American Indians.
Even in the twentieth cantury, historians have written about the American
Indian with very little understanding about "him" (since this was assumed to be a
3. Major Problems in American Indian History
man's history) and the depth of his distinct culture. The ill-trained historian ap-
proached Indian history with his or her graduate training for writing mainstream
history. Historians borrowed much of their approach tiom western buffs mostly
interested in Indian wars. Next, a srnall group of scholars emerged to write classi-
cal tribal histories. The initial studies were published in the 1930s and 1940s by the
University of Oklahoma Press. These works led the way for other presses to pro-
duce American Indian books.
The growing scholarly interest in Indians led to a series of conferences in the
early 1950s, including the Ohio Valley Historic Indian Conference on November 21,
1953. A number of scholars participated, especially anthropologists involved in In-
dian claims cases, and this regional conf'erence was expanded into the annual Amer-
ican Indian Ethnohistoric Conference, currently known as the American Society for
Ethnohistory. Since then, scholars have struggled to understand the complexity of
American Indian hislory.
In the early 1970s, historians worked to revise the discipline when they recog-
nized that inadequate means were being used to examine Indian history. Historians
foilowed the example of anthropologists using ethrpgfrFn'o study American
Indian history. The breakthrough was the distinction 1{f "culturgZ and the study of it
as a part of history. Historians who study Indian histo-.-u*nink in terms of cul-
ture, community, environment, and metaphysics.
Ethnohistory has allowed a cross-disciplinary approach using history and an-
thropology to study American Indian history. Since then, Native American history
has been written by geographers, sociologjand literary writers using a combina-
tion of their academic expertise and th{tools }f historians. The value of the ethno-
historical approach is that it examines rFiE( and culture within time periods that
also allow it to address historical events. As one ethnohistorian stated, the advantage
is that ethnohistory can go beyond the limitations of one discipline by combining
two fields. On a cautionary note, another scholar warned that ethnohistory written
about American Indians is largely from a western perspective, while continuing to
suppress the American Indian point of view.
A revived interest in Indians was aided by Indians themselves during the rise
of the Red Power movement during the late 1960s, when frustrated urban Indians
olganized protest marches for better treatment of Indian people. Indian lctivism
and Indian militancy such as the occupations of Alcatraz (1969), the Bureau of In-
dian Affarrs (1972) and Wounded Knee (1973) renewed public interest in Ameri-
can Indians. This renaissance resulted in the rvriting of a deluge of Indian literature
and history.
American Indian history is often thought of as a history of Indian-white rela-
tions. The fact that the Native peoples of the western hemisphere already possessed
histories of thousands of years time depth befbre the arrival of Columbus has had r
little effect on non-Indians who perceive that only written records comprise history. V
Records of relations between the United States and Indian tribes have been nu-
merous and lengthy. The noted Record Group 75 of the National Archives includes
more than 1 1,000 cubic feet of documents collected since 1824 when the Office of
Indian Aflairs opened. More than 19,000 cubic feet of financial documents from
the years 1790-1921 are found under Record Group 217. There are 610 docket
cases of the Indian Claims Commission in Record Grotrp279.
4. lnterpretinll the lndian Past
A dependence on documents eliminates other evidence, and precludes other
methods and disciplines fiom interpreting Indian history. This singular, focused ap-
proach has produced an interpretation that hinges on the white point of view. It is not
a balanced history of American Indians since it yields but one version of a history of
two peoples interacting. Rather, it is an Amerocentric interpretation of Indian his-
tory, a point of view that is shared by the majority of American historians writing
about the United States, Europe, diplomatic, and general history.
As historians ernploy the methodologies of other academic disciplines, other
formsofevidenceanddatahaveemerged.Forexample,culturalitemsfound<..'.
underground like pieces of pottery or hunting weapons need to be considered by
-x) LL r(L4
historians writing about tribal camp lif'e as social history. Ceremonial items would
compel historians to consider the religious views and tribal philosophies extrapo-
lated from them.
A discussion of what is meant by American Indian history is important in
determining the parameters for this essay. American Indian history is not just on" y'y'
history of all Indian people. Actually it is a lield of many tribal histories, compli-
cated by their relations with the United States. At this date. SJztr+esq the United
?2
States and Native Alaska communities have been federally @nrze./ The signif-
icance here is the importance of "relations" in Indian history. In many case, tribes
that had foreign relations with European nations before the American Revolution
added another level of historical relations with the United States _povernment after.
In this light, this series of relations also should include relations between tribes.
Considering Indian history from this approach is primarily one of external relations,
and studying the history of relations is like studying diplomatic history or foreign
policy. It is from this general view of Indian history that studying the relations
from a non-Indian, Amerocentric point of view places American Indians in a mar-
ginal history. This kind of myopic history is a violation of professional ethics when
scholars trre supposed to examine all the evidence and postulate objective analyses.
To ignore such narrow interpretations is to further break ethics by choosing not to
attempt to balance the historical perspectives.
Arnerican Indian history had been viewed as a minority history of less impor-
tance by frontier and Turnerian historians who viewed Indians as a part of the fron-
tier, dipiomatic historians who clairn that Indians ai:e an internal subject, and
domestic historians who hid Indians in footnotes and called them "pawns" in the
making of American History. Such Amerocentric blindness and academic ar-rogance
ignores Indians, and mainstream historians have elected to exile American Indians
to "disciplinary banishment." The repercussions are devastating. Each new gelera- /^ /-
tion of students learns a misconstrued history of the Americas. Unless critical revil l/
sionist textbooks include a more accurate accounting of the role of American
Indians in the history of the Americas, Indians could one day be written out of his-
tory. In many colleges and universities. Indian history is not taught, but it is even z /
worse when an uninformed, insensitive scholar attempts to teach Indian history{ V
Fortunately, an estimated 250 scholars teach Indian history as a course or as a part
of their course on the American West. So then, the root of bias in mainstream history
must rest in the mainstream culture and its conscious and subconscious attitudes
towards other peoples'histories. It is ethically wrong to use research to subvert the
fair historical representation of other peoples, leaders, and non-mainstream events.
5. 6 lrl.alor Problems in American Indian History
The most important ethical concern is for American Indian history to be in-
cluded in the scope of the American experience, so that historians would encounter
it as a part oftheir training in graduate school. Indian history should not be regarded
as a special or exotic subfield to be pushed aside and ignored. In actuality Indian
history has set fte foundation of American history. For example, early white settlers
,| , /adiusteA to rhe environment in ways
that Indians had done for centuries. Although
" " ,h. results differed, the environment has had a major influence on all peoples in
America. To ignore the historical variable of environment is to view history only
from a human perspective, disallowing a broader research focus that includes all
' factors influencing the facts as they fit together. Unfortunately American main-
stream history has placed "man" above "woman" and, indeed, above all other as-
pects of society, culture, environment, climate, and metaphysical forces.
In brief, ethics in writing Indian history;gggggpect for Native Americans in-
cluding, preferably, visiting Indian people in their homEtffiK Interpreting research
data and writing to take into account the Indian viewpoint is a most important ethic.
After all. Native American history should focus on how and why Indians partici-
pated in the American experience. Writing Indian history respectfully also requires
avoiding negative terminology such as "savage," "red skin," "Indian plight" and
other pejorative names or inappropriate prose that demean Indian peopie. Writing
prop"i Indian history would include avoiding suppressing Indians, or writing from
an Amerocentric view. Finally, ethics would include researching and examining all
kinds of evidence, including non-written data.
One significant responsibility of all scholarship is to pursue the unknown,
especially as it relates to the known. Specifically, mainstream American history
presents "one" perspective, which is the known. However, the known history of
this particular mainstream perspective fails to challenge itself to experience the un-
known or little-known history of American Indians. This narrow vision of history
fails to account for the full American experience. Such mainstream myopia fails to
understand the other side of historical issues, other historical figures, and Native
peoples and their cultures. It is unethical for scholars to claim they are experts on
American history; rather they are specialists.
American Indian communities possess internal histories of relations defined ac-
corrling to their separate cultures. Tribal communities are built on an infrastructure of
interrelated societies and roles, such as clans, leaders, warriors, medicinal persons,
and others. An important part of this network is the community's relationship with
the flora, fauna, and metaphysical spirituality. This network is based on a socio-
cultural understanding of a religious nature. Such an understanding of the internal
history of what has happened within the community remains foreign to the Amero-
centric historian. This dimension oflndian history cannot be seriously studied until
new tools ofhistorical interpretation and new theories can be developed'
The situation requires a basic understanding of the internal and external his-
tories of Native communities. This process is similar to that of using an under-
standing of United States domestic history and foreign relations to properly study
and teach American History. Understanding both the internalness and externalness
of tribal communities-even if the assignment is to study or teach the relations of
that tribe at war with the United States-is critically important in presenting a bal-
anced history. Unfortunately, this balanced history has been lacking in the practice
of American Indian historY.
6. Interpreting the Indian Past
Historians nlw have an opportunity to study and learn about rhe inrernal narure
of Indian communities at the tribal or urban levels. This means using ethnohistory
or anthropology to comprehend the cultural development of the community. In con-
sidering Indian history in this manner, it is necessary to use introspective analysis
ofhow Indians perceive history with regard to tribal language, values, kinship rela-
tions, infrastructure, societal norms, tribal beliefs, and worldview. To further this
consideration, historians mttst be willing to acknowledge other means of analyzing
history and other sources of facts. For instance, historians will need to turn to other
forms of history such as interviews and oral history.
t/o
For many years the debate against oral history has gone on despite Studs Terkel
winning the Pulitzer Prize tbr "The Good War" : An Oral History of World War Two
in 1984. Historians must be ready to accept other kinds of history and must approach
other disciplines to understand Indian history. Social and cultural history are ger-
,##
mane as is the use ofhistorical archaeology to restructure Indian history and under-
stand the internalness of tribal communities. The problem for those who write about
American Indians is that written sources have been produced almost exclusively by
non-Indians. The alternative is to use oral history and interviews to acquire knowl-
edge about such internal matters as kinship patterns and political organizations.
The need for ethics and responsibilities in teaching and writing American
Indian history increases as more individuals pursue the subject. The significance of
this dilemma is accelerated as concern about the global environment causes people Y.]:onYArtlu*
to turn to tribal philosophies of environmental caretaking. This movement is evi-
denced in the misguided New Age movement and recent videos, documentaries, and
films about American Indians [e.g., "Squanto" (1994), "Last of the Mohicans"
(1993), "Lakota Woman" (1994), "Hawkeye" (1994), "The Broken Chain" (1994),
and "Dances with Wolves" (1992)1. Non-Indians are increasingly listening to Indian
people as a growing number of Indian communities demand input on these projects.
Obtaining a tribal viewpoint, a Native feeling, and the other side of history, and then
thinking like an Indian and putting yourself in that other position are mandatory for
teaching and writing a balanced history oflndian-white relations.
In summary, the moral ethics of properly working in American Indian history
include deliberate removal of ethnocentrism. Improper attitudes have caused schol-
ars to write negative histories about American Indians, or to write arrogant histories
in which non-Indians see themselves as superior to Indians for whatever insecure
reasons. Proper attitude is ethically to subvert racist analysis and subconscious
thought about lndians. Respect toward Indian people and their heritage is ethically
important. The next ethical step is consideration of Indian viewpoints, while striv-
ing to think as an Indian. Disputing the imbalanced scholarship of the past about
American Indians becomes a crucial part of the role of the ethical scholar. Moreover
scholars must respect sensitive knowledge about tribal ways and not publish infor-
mation about certain cultural rituals. The ethic of openmindedness in considering
the value of disciplines other than one's own and being open to other forms of his-
torical data is imperative to piece together a truer picture of the Indian past.
Responsibilities for American Indian history include fair treatment in the
portrayal of Indians as well as other minorities within the mainstream society, and
balanced treatment in the characterization of Indian males and females. Culture is
an important concept in correctly addressing Native American history, as well as
analyzing environmental impacts on Indian life. The scholar needs to stretch his or
7. Major Problems in American Indian Hktory
her imagination to ponder the depth of tribal ways and values as these influenced
human behavior and history. The scholar must consider the worldview of an Indian
group to comprehend its members' sense of logic and ideology. In order to accom-
plish this task, thinking about the "whole" of Indian life is imperative. After this
step, it is essential to define the conception of reality constructed by the Indian com-
munity. Mainstream conceptions of reality such as those commonly constructed in
the contemporary world cannot be used to study the past. The historian has the re-
ibility to understand the reality a tribe constructed to constitute its historical
experiences of the physical and metaphysical as a whole.
Historians who teach and write American Indian history must examine the
whole picture in studying Native American societies and cultures. Such a responsi-
bility also involves examining Indian history from the diverse perspectives of white
American views including different bureaucratic positions, missionary beliefs, and
humanitarian concerns, as well as from the perspectives of the many tribes. A1l of
these views naturally depend on the subject of study, and it bears repeating that a
single Indian voice is impractical. Just as one cannot say that there is one European
view, neither can one say that there is only one Indian view of history.
The historian's last responsibility in achieving a true balance is to "think like
an Indian." While this may seem impractical, studying tribal cultures enables a
scholar to understand individual and group behavior within the tribal community.
Thinking of a synthetic physical and metaphysical reality allows the scholar to un-
derstand Indians as pro-active instead of reactive in respect to historical events. In
gaining such a Native perspective it is necessary to use ethnohistorical methodolo-
gies to reconstruct history according to how tribal members remember i1.
This extraordinary diversity of perspectives illuminates the sociocultural and
political complexity of American Indian history from an external point of view.
Combining the external perspective with an understanding of an inner perspective
balances the equation, resulting in a proper study of American Indian history. Placing
both perspectives within the full context of Indian life in relationship to the natural
world is the ultimate goal in analyzing and writing American Indian history.
Indian Peoples and the Natural World
Asking the Right Questions
RICHARD WHITE
ethodology/s at the heart of any historical endeavor because methodology goes
dirE-ctly to the most critical of historical questions: How is it that we claim to know
about the past? I will make this more specific. Historians concerned with questions
of Indians and the environment have made a series of sweeping claims. They have
argued that many Indian peoples had, and some still have, quite distinctive ways of
Richard White, "Indian Peoples and the Naturai World: Asking the Right Questions," in Donald L. Fixico,
ed., Rethinking American Indian Hisrory (Albuquerque, N. Mex.: University of New Mexico Press, 1997),
87-100. Copyright @ 1997. Reprinted with permission.
8. Interpreting the Indian Past
understanding and culturally constructing nature and that Indian actions, in fact,
shaped much of the North American world that whites regarded as wilderness.
How is it that they claim to know this?
In answering this question, we appeal largely to our practice. Academic histo-
rians assert knowledge of the past because they agree on a set of methods according
to which claims about the past can be evaluated and judged. These methods will
ideally yield general, but hardly universal, agreement among practitioners as to
whether some claims are more valid or less valid than other claims. Arguably, there
may be a consensus on historical methodology in general, but the environmental his-
tory of Indian peoples is another, quite separate case. Writing an environmental
history of Indian peoples involves a hybrid methodology in which the methods of
environmental history meet the methods of Indian history (a.k.a. ethnohistory,
a.k.a. anthropological history). Ethnohistorical methods of cultural reconstruction,
scientific methods of landscape reconstruction, and more conventional historical
methods all overlap. The result is often dissonance and confusion.
The most basic tasks of any historical method involve asking and answering
questions. In any historical methodology, historical methods are intimately related
to historical questions. A methodology stipulates not only how to answer ques-
tions, but also how to ask them.
Talking about questions in the abstract is confusing, so let me provide as an
illustrative text two very broad questions (hereafter Big Question One and Big
Question Two) that recur both in the academic and the popular writing about the
environment and Indian peoples. They will provide avenues into this methodologi-
cal issue and prevent the discussion from becoming overiy abstract.
First, how do we know what Indians thought in the past about what we now call
nature, and what equivalent or related conceptions of the natural world might Indian
peoples have had at various times in the past?
Second, how do we know how Indians acted in the past in regard to the natural
world, and what were the consequences of their actions?
In answering the first of these questions historians borrow from ethnohistory; in
answering the second, they borrow from environmental history and environmental
sciences.
How we ask questions is particularly critical in Indian environmental history. It
is a field full of pitfalls: hidden assumptions, questions that are really answers in dis-
guise, and loose and unworkable categories. Any methodology that allows us to an-
swer these big questions must stipulate that we ask the questions in a rvay that makes
more than one answer possibie. I will call this basic requirement of asking opera-
tional questions (that is, questions open to more than one answer) operationality.
To illustrate operationality and the dangers of bad questions, let's go back to
Big Question 1.
1. How do we know about what the ancestors of the peoples we now call Indians
thought in the past about what we now call nature and what conceptions of the natural
world might these ancestors of Indian peoples have had at various times in the past?
This convoluted phrasing might seem to represent an excess of academic cau-
tion, the kind of thing that makes it impossible to get a straight answer out of a pro-
fessor. But the construction is quite purposeful. I want to frame a question that can
9. l0 Major Problems in American lndian Histlry
be answered while at the same time keeping the major concepts the question em-
ploys open to interrogation. I am trying not to presume too much in the question. I
am. in particular. trying not to presume:
First, that there is a universal and transcendent agreement on what "nature" is
and that agreement corresponds to our modern concept of nature.
Second, that modern day Indian peoples are identical with or have the same atti-
tudes of their ancestors.
I am also trying to make clear thatl am acting on a third assumption: that Indians
are a people of history and that their beliefs can be discovered and understood
through historical research.
No serious historical methodology can proceed without critically examining
the concepts it is putting into play, and few terms in contemporary discourse are
more contested than nature and Indians.
"The idea of nature," Raymond Williams has written, "contains, though often
unnoticed, an extraordinary amount of human history." Nature, Williams empha-
sizes, is an idea that shifts and changes over time. What we choose to call nature is
culturally and historically specific. You can touch deer, elk, or rocks, but you can-
not touch nature. It is not a timeless concept floating through history. We cannot
begin our search for what various Indian groups thought about nature without leav-
ing open the possibility that they did not think about nature at all. Certainly, they
thought about deer, rain, fog, water, corn, camas roots, and all kinds of other non-
human objects, but they did not necessarily group them together in the category
nature. Various Indian peoples certainly might have had equivalent concepts, but if
they did, it is the historian's job to demonstrate that they did.
There is a corollary involved in leaving our terms open to inquiry; asking
questions reveals that in actual practice our methods do not stand totally separate
from our findings. In fact, they constantly inform each other. The framing of our
questions and our methodology proceeds in conversation with our research itself.
The second term at issue here, Indian, is a good example of this conversation
between methods and findings. Much of the older literature proceeded on the sup-
position that there was a rather unproblematic racial identity and common outlook
attached to the word Indian. The very concept Indian went unintenogated, and this
approach has by now been so roundly attacked that I will not proceed to recount
the arguments here.
But if the term Indian has been problematized, much popular and indeed much
academic history still proceeds on the assumption that there was a coherent "Indian"
attitude toward nature. J. Donald Hughes writes that "when one asks a traditional
Indian, 'How much of the earth is sacred space?' the answer is unhesitating: 'A11.' "
As an illustration, he cites Chief Seattle. The easy methodological attack on Hughes
is his lailure to question a source, the supposed speech of Chief Seattle, that is
, almost certainly a fabrication. But I think the more crucial issue is the easy accep-
tance of.the ter.m traditional Indian with all its universalizing tendencies. Having
"./ accepted the idea of this pan-tribal traditional Indian, one misses all the specific
b
false notes in Seattle's speech and hears only its resonance with our construction;
the traditional Indian. We cannot move from specific studies to universal Indian
beliefs. Richard Nelson, for example, although he makes methodological mistakes
10. Interpreting tht Indidn Pdst II
of his own, carefully emphasizes that he is looking at Koyukon attitudes toward
nature in Make Prayers to the Raven. Koyukon beliefs cannot stand for the beliefs
of all Native Americans regarding the natural environment.
This tendency to universalize and essentialize Indian can take quite specific
environmental forms. Indians can be constructed. for instance. as the antithesis of
history, which, in turn, is constructed as the antithesis of nature. Since a historical
methodology presumes a history to study, defining Indians as outside history as we
understand it creates a few problems. But according to [historian] Calvin Martin,
Indian supposedly "subscribed to a philosophy of history, and of time, profoundly
different from ours." Our history, according to Martin, ignores the "biological per-
spective" of Indian history.
Indians look not for history but for the "timeless wisdom of the human species,
'the phylogenetic content of human experience."' Historians, Martin contends,
"need to get out of history, as we know it, if we wish to write authentic histories of
American Indians." Historical methodology, I will be the first to admit, is of very
little use if one is attempting to get out of history.
I accept none of Martin's arguments or premises, but my point here is not to
argue with him but, rather, to turn him to a methodological pulpose. Martin's at-
tack on history, is, in fact, itself a history, and shows the difficulties of using his-
tory to escape history. He gives a history of the invention of history. Martin finds
himself relying on history itself to discredit historical consciousness.
But beyond this, Martin's history shows how not to fiame historical questions.
Martin phrases his questions in such a way that there can be only one answer.
Martin asserts that "real Indians" do not think in linear time, never have and never
will. This statement demands a history, for how could we know this is true unless
we go back and examine conceptions of time among various Indian groups in the
past? The question would be: Are there Indian peoples who think in terms of linear
time and conceive of a linear history? For this to be an operational question, there
has to be the possibility of more than one answer. But Martin structures his argu-
ment as a tautology, for his definition of an Indian is, in effect, a person descended
from the original inhabitants of the Americas who does not recognize linear time.
Any Indian contaminated with linear thinking is no longer a "real" Indian.
This tactic does not place Indians outside history; it places Martin outside usual
historical practice. Uniess a statement is posed so that it is refutable, ir is not a
meaningfuI historical question.
The first step of any historical methodology, then, is asking operational ques-
tions. Let me drive this home with one trnal example of a bad question: Were Indians
environmentalists?
To show why this is a bad question, I'11 tell you a story about a seven year old,
the son of a friend of my wife. The seven year old is Puyallup; he listens to adults
talk about how whites have changed Puget Sound. He thinks about it and what the
world must have been like before whites came. Old ways have changed; things
once permitted have been curtailed. Before whites came, he decided in the way
seven years old decide such things, Indians did not have to drive on the right side of
the road. They could drive their cars wherever they pleased.
But asking if Indians could drive on the wrong side of the road before whites
came is not much different from askine if Indians were environmentalists. Both
11. t2 Major Prohlems in American Indian History
assume that a curent set of ideas and practices can be read back into the past. A
seven year old assumes there were cars, roads, drivers; those who ask if Indians were
environmentalists assume there was a "nature" that corresponds to our "nature" and
practices that can be evaluated according to our definitions of environmentalism. In
both cases very twentieth-century practices and concepts are read back onto the past.
Posing questions is, of course, only the first step. Answering them is the trick.
Since Indian peoples themselves have left us very few records, we rely largely on
records produced by non-Indians and on much more recent accounts left by Indians.
Now given a certain construction of Indian societies, this lack of records from the
past is not really an issue. An extreme view, represented by a colleague of mine at
the University of Washington, a very good ethnobotanist and anthropologist named
Eugene Hunn. According to Eugene Hunn, and to paraphrase an old Who song, a
good informant can see for millennia. This same practice is often asserted, at least
implicitly, by the description of certain practices or beliefs as traditional. In one form
this embrace oftradition is straightforward and regards the past as transparent.
This embracing of an unchanging tradition is, however, so extreme that it
virtually negates history itself. It brackets off part of a culture so as to make it
immune from the changes afi'ecting everything around it. We have now a consider-
able literature on the syncretic [combined with new elements] nature of many
"traditional" Indian beliefs. . . . [There is a] necessity of recognizing the long time
that whites and Indians have been in contact and in conversation. There are numer-
ous outside influences on modern Indian belief's and abundant evidence that they
change over time.
Much more common is a second methodological technique: upstreaming,
which is connected with the work of William Fenton. Upstreaming starts fiom a
plausible premise. Current cultural formulations about things such as nature have
not been fbrmed from whole cloth. Basic cultural patterns remain constant over
long periods of time. They have a history. Therefore we can, in effect, disaggregate
current customs, beliefs, and practices and look fbr replicas in the past. So far so
good. When reliable sources at both ends of the time span describe similar prac-
tices, we can supposedly use safely more abundant modern information to fill in
what we do not know about ancient beliefs and practice.
There are two problems here. First, it assumes that the social group in question
(the tribe, or nation) has remained relatively constant. Second, it assumes that if
rituals or practices exist across time then the meaning and significance of these
practices also exists relatively unchanged across time. Both are problematic.
We cannot assume obvious connections between modern Indian groups and
historic groups bearing the same names. Historians have sometimes presumed that
any Indian group and its cultural practices could potentially be traced back to an
ancestral group living before European contact. Recent work, however, has con-
vincingly demonstrated that many tribes are very much historic creations. They did
not exist before contact any more than the modern category Americans existed be-
fore contact. James Merrell's work on the Catawbas and J. Leitch Wright's history
of the Muscogolees are two prominent examples.
But the main problem with upstreaming is that similar words, customs, and
practices can hold radically different meanings at various points in time. There is
much, for example, that is constant in a Catholic mass, but few historians would
12. lnterpretin! the Indian Past I3
argue that we could therefore take the beliefs of modern Catholicism and fix them
on medieval Catholicism. We do not attempt to do so because we have abundant
sources on medieval Catholicism that both show us that this is not true and make it
unnecessary to do so. We, however, lack such sources for many Indian peoples, and
so upstreaming has considerable appeal. We would be wise to resist the temptation
as much as possible.
I think the basic technique in reconstructing older worlds has to remain very
close to traditional historical practice: close reading, evaluation, and contextualiza-
tion of the records. Our basic rule is to know what they are, why they were produced,
when they were produced, and what they represent.
Much of what we then do is a kind of literary analysis, but with a differenc
History is an act of interpretation; it is, among other things, a reading and re-reading
of documents. Ideally, our methods are always comparative. We compare docu- .
ments; we read them against each other. We order them chronologically. Decon- )
struction [a method of literary analysis] is, in a sense, what historians have done /
for a considerable time. We look for assumptions; hidden threads of connectiog*i/
we probe for absences.
But in Indian history at the earliest stages we are dealing with an imperial his-
tory whose documents are not produced by Indians and which both record the re-
duction of Indians to a European order and understanding and are one of the means
of their reduction. Those documents rarely contain Indian writing, but they otten
contain Indian voices, or what purport to be Indian voices. We need, of course, to be
sure that the voices speaking are, in fact, Indian. Whites often speak through Indians.
particularly when Indians speak of nature. From the Adario of the Baron de Lahotan
to Seattle's speech, to modern books like the Daughters of Copper Woman, we have
had a whole array of fake Indian voices as well as the mixed Indian/white voice of
classic accounts such as Black Elk.
The lack of "Indian" sources might seem on first glance a debilitating liability,
but it can in certain circumstances be a singular advantage. Many of the Indian
voices that survive in the earliest and most problematic documents are talking to
outsiders in circumstances in which both they and their listeners needed to reach a
common understanding. They are engaged in a language that creates what I have
elsewhere described as the middie ground.
A large chunk ofour early documents, then, are conversations between people
who do not completely understand each other. Methodologically this has implica-
tions. "To know a culture," Greg Deming has written, "is to know its system of
expressed meanings. To know cultures in contact is to know the misreadings
of meaning." We are connoisseurs of misreadings. We rarely know Indians alone;
we always know them in conversation with whites. During early contact situations
we never get transparent accounts that allow us to peer into a world of Indian
meanings. We get mutual misreadings which often become a new common read-
ing: a middle ground.
My own operating assumption is that we will never recover a pure Indian past,
a purely indian view of the natural world as it existed before whites, because we
are prisoners of the documents. What we have is mixture, impurity, and dirtiness. To
seek purity is to create falsity. In Greg Deming's metaphor, this kind of ethnohistori-
cal construction is a history of beaches. We know little of the islands that lie beyond.
13. 14 Major Probkms in American Indian Hislory
But to be trapped on the beach does not mean that we might not at least look
what ar-
into the interior. We have limited lines of sight into the islands. We have
chaeology gives us, but archaeology's ability to recreate worlds of meaning is very
limited. A second line of sight comes through language. A third comes
through
what we might call spatial histories.
know
Historians have done very little with language because so few historians
any native languages. Our argument has been that there are no'
or very few, docu-
ments in the language and very often no or very few native speakers are left, so
a third objection:
what is the point;f learning it? To this, we quite legitimately add
languages like everything else. The language recorded at a given point is
"tung"
not necessarily the historical language'
All that is true, but languages usually change relatively slowly. Preserved in
that struc-
the language are conceptual frameworks, categorizations of the world
ture how a speaker perieives and organizes the world. In them are potential in-
skills that
sights into worlds we do not know, but to follow them we need linguistic
most historians do not Possess.
is now nearly
The Lushootseed language of southern Puget Sound, for instance,
extinct, but in it are clues to a way of viewing and understanding the world' There
words for
are native words that sefve as straight equivalents for English words,
porpoise, various varieties of salmon, bullheads, candlefish, and so on, but more
salmon that
i"ueuting are words without direct equivalents. There are words for old
has akeldy spawned and is about to die and what fish in general are called after
spawning. There are classifications such as tataculbix-large animals-which refer
not only to size but to use: large animals are food for the people'
Language connecrs with a second way of recovering an Indian
view of the
world that moves behind the documents. Spatial history concerns the movement
but in
of people across the land. Metaphorically, Europeans remained on beaches,
ucioutiiy they moved inland. Their records of travel become soufces for a spatial
history which is not a history of what they discovered, what they believed
was
ah"ajy constituted, but instead a history of their movements themselves, of why
they went where they did; of how and why they created boundaries.
They turned
spa." irrto place. They constituted a world and as they did so they often
revealed
another world, another possible organization of space that they were
in the process
of either destroying or covering over. where they found Indians, where Indians
named and occu-
sought to block their path or steer them, the places Indians had
piei'b"fore them all emerge in their travelings and can become the stuff of a spatial
in space'
irirtoty critical to environmental history, which always has to be located
materials for
Court cases filed by the Hopi andZ'srlihave provided abundant
spatial histories, but as an example of different conceptions
of the world that can be
the late nineteenth
partially retrieved let me again turn to Lushootseed. There was in
u long battle over the name of Mount Rainier. Seattle
wanted Mount Rainier;
""n,ury wanted, not surprisingly, Tacoma, which was derived from the Lushootseed
Tacoma
covered mountain,"
teq,ube? Teq*ube? is uiually translated as "permanently snow
ani it refers actually to all mountains that have this character. Mount Rainier was
just the supreme. exemplar of a type' But the.derivation of the name seems to
come
fro* *ord, meaning liierally "mountain bearing water." But what does it mean to be
a mountain bearing watef? A source of rivers?
Glaciers? There seems to be a spatial
14. Interpretino rhe lntlian Pan I 5
relationhere, a hi.story, which sets the Iandscape in motion. Around such quesrions
can come recovery over an older categorization of the world. . . .
II
The second Big Question-How do we know how Indians acted in the past in regard
to the natural world and what the consequences of their actions were?-carries into
another set of methodological dilemmas. This question involves correlating what
the landscape looked like with descriptions of Indian action. Our descriptions of
both actions and landscape are partial, fragmentary, and not completely reliable.
Methodologicaliy, this is actually quite comforting. It is the kind of problem histo-
rians routinely confront. But historians, in working with this material, do not work
alone. Much environmental history is interdisciplinary in the sense that historians
use the findings and raw data, and much less often the methods, of other disciplines.
Other scholars, in turn, use the data and findings of environmental historians. They
misuse our data; we misuse lheirs.
Most historians recognize the fiagmentary and complicated nature of evidence.
We do not treat what survives from the past as if it were in any way a random or
scientific sample of documents, let alone that those documents preserve some rep-
resentative random slice of human behavior. Some scientists in using historical
evidence, however, sometimes treat this evidence as if it were, indeed. a random
sample of Indian actions. Emily Russell, an ecologist, has, for example, made an
argument for a limited Indian use of fire in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
on the basis of European accounts reporting Indian use of fire. Essentially, she
evaluated sources mentioning fire as if they were a sample of Indian activities.
Specific mentions of Indian burning were few; therefore, Indian burning was rare.
This, of course, does not follow, but it raises an interesting issue. How do we know
that Indians all across the continent burned the woods or grasslands regularly if
this is not something we can easily demonstrate from the records alone? -
To make the case, historians borrow from ecological studies and risk mis-'1
using ecologist's sources just as they sometimes misuse ours. We want to deter-
mine, if possible, what a landscape that was burned regularly might look hke and, /
if it is possible to determine, whether natural fires alone might produce such a
landscape. If, in fact, we find that the landscape described at contact gives signs of
regular burning, and we can determine the approximate rate at which natural fires
occur, and we have accounts of Indian-set fires, then we can begin to make better
claims for Indian actions. If, for example, natural fires are rare but we have ac-
counts of vegetation that thrives in frequently burned landscapes and we have even
scattered accounts of Indian burning, then we can suggest that lve are seeing a
pyrogenic landscape.
There is a second technique. If we can determine when Indian-set fires were
eliminated and trace the results of this fire suppression, then we can reason that at
least part of the earlier landscape may very well have been the result of Indian
burning. To do this, historians need to use specialized studies that include exami-
nation of fire scarring, dendrochronology, and repeat photography. All of these
methods appear in the literature. We are methodological parasites. Our conclusions
depend on feeding off the work of others.
15. t6 Nlajor Problems in American Indian Hrstory
There is a danger involved in this kind of parasitism and historians have
already encountered it. We become prisoners of the conceptual framework of those
outside our discipline and when their work changes or lalls apart, so does ours. A
crisis in ecology has had profound effects on environmental history. I will use
myself as an example.
In 1980 I published a revised version of my doctoral dissertation with a rather
turgid title that I have never been allowed to live down: Land Use, Environmental
and Social Change: The Shaping of Island Counf4 Woshington. The early chapters
concern the landscape Indian peoples created in Island Country and how it
changed with white settlement. In the book, I used ecological concepts like com-
munity, succession, climax, and ecosystem unproblematically, as if they were
scientific descriptions of actual things or events in nature. I did this even though
within the discipline of ecology, these ideas had already come under attack. Look-
ing back now, I realize that this book and other historicai studies were themselves
undermining such ecological concepts even as they relied on them. Histonans were
describing a human impact upon the natural world-including an Indian impact-
so pervasive that it made questions of climax and successions seem abstractions
with few equivalents in the actual landscape. The very scope ofthe changes that I
described in the book should have made me more suspicious of what I mistook for
unquestioned orthodoxy. Like most scholars, however, I was more polite and less
belligerent when intruding upon disciplines other"than my own.
Any intersection of the methods of diff'erent disciplines is fraught with danger.
But there are also considerable opportunities. Historical studies have had a signiti-
cant impact on ecological studies. Ecologists who once assumed little or limited
human impact on environments before the introduction of European agriculture
now are much more aware of a wide range of Indian activities from burning to
grazing of domestic livestock, to farming. But at the same time the insistence of
historians on these activities has undermined their own easy reliance on a method-
ology borrowed from an old and now obsolete ecology, and has forced them to pay
more attention to newer ecological constructions in which stability plays little part
and contingency is as prevalent as in history. Historians have to be aware of such
changes. Historians of Indian peoples are not ecologists, but ecological studies be-
come one of our major sources in reconstructing Indian actions.
This essay is not intended to be a mere listing of ways that historians recon-
struct landscapes and surmise Indian actions, but instead to stress that the tech-
niques for recovering these landscapes, which include dendrochronology, pollen
studies. repeat photography, GIS mapping, and numerons techniques that are being
developed alnost constantly, become a critical part of the methodological tool kit.
This methodological tool kit is inherently unstable. Developing a historical
methodology, particularly in an interdisciplinary field, rneans constant attention to
what you are doing and what those in the fields you plunder are doing. Not only do
your own findings, and those of your colleagues, influence your methods, but the
basic concepts that underlie methods you borrow from other tields can be about as
stable as California. Intellectual earthquakes, fires, storms, and landslides can send
structures you think secure tumbling down. If interdisciplinary history is not going
to be one field borrowing the mistakes of another, we need to be constantly aware of
16. lnterpreting the Indian Past 17
other disciplines. What seems certain is that the methodologies we leam in graduate
school will not be the methodologies at the end of our own practice as historians.
@FU RTI{ER READING
Woodrow W Borah and Sherburne F. Cook, Essays in Population History,3 vols.
(197 1-1983)
Jennifer S. H. Brown and Elizabeth Vibert, eds., Reading BeyondWords: Contexts for
Native History (1996)
Donald L. Fixico, ed., Rethinking American Indian History Q997)
Guy E. Gibbon, ed., The Archaeology of Prehistoric Native America: An Encyclopedia
(1998)
Laurence M. Hauptman, Tribes and Tribulations: Misconceptions About American Indians
and Their Histories ( 1995)
Frederick E. Hoxie, ed., Encyclopedia of North American Indians (1996)
Frederick E. Hoxie and Peter Iverson, eds., Indians in American History: An Introduction
( I 998)
Wilbur Jacobs, The Fatal Confrontation: Historical Studies of Indians, Environment, and
Historians (1996)
Shepard Krech III, "The State ofEthnohistory," Annual Review ofAnthropology 20 (1991),
345-375.
Calvin Martin, ed., The American Indian and the Problem of History (1987)
In the Spirit of the Earth: Rethinking History and Time (1992)
The Way of the Human Being (1999)
Laura F. Klein and Lillian A. Ackerman. eds.. Woman and Power in Native North America
( 1 995)
Devon A. Mihesuah, ed., Natives and Academics: Researching and Writing About
American Indians (L998)
Donald L. Parman and Catherine Price, 'A 'Work in Progress': The Emergence of Indian
History as a Professional Field," Western Historical Quarterly 20 (1989): 185-196
Daniel K. Richter, "Whose Indian History?" The William and Mary Quarterly 50 (April
1993),3'79-393
Thomas E. Sheridan, "How to Tell the Story of a 'People without History,"' Journal of the
Southwest 30 (1988): 168-189
William C. Sturtevant, ed., Handbook of North American Indians,20 vols. (1978-)
Russell Thornton, American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History Since
1492 (1987)
John W. Verano and Douglas H. Ubelaker, eds., Disease and Demography in the Americas
(ree2)