Category Analysis
Auto Air Fresheners
Martin Jackson
Current Market
• Car Air Freshener total US
market was $450M in 2013
– Grew ~8% from 2012
– Fastest Growing type is vent
clips and sticks +18% YOY
– Paper fresheners still hold
the overall lead
+8%
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
$500
Auto Air Freshener
Revenue $M
2012 2013
Current Market Share
• Confusion over market
leader
– Car-Freshner claims “Global
Leader in automotive air
fresheners”
– Handstands claims “the #1
NPD market share producer
in the USA”
– Kline Group lists P&G as the
leading marketer in the
category
– Auto Expressions claims
“dominates the Air Freshener
Market across US and Canada
with approx 43% market
share”
• Very diverse channels but
~75% is focused on a few
retailers
Potential Market
• A lot of potential for
growth
• Market facing new
entrants seeking to pick
up share
– P&G bringing the $1B
brand febreeze into the
category
– Bath and Body Works
and Yankee Candle
offerings for auto scents
in their mall stores as
well as expanding them
into other large retailers
$450 M Category Revenue
÷ 244 M Vehicles registered in US
$1.84 Spent per Vehicle
244 M Vehicles registered in US
X 12 months
X $1 Average cost for air freshener
$2.9 B Maximum Total Market
What is right?
• Targeting 3 distinct target
markets with 3 brands
• 28 patents for air care
products protects design
• Wide distribution
• Product designs project
lifestyle and image for
consumer
• Kline Group claims they are
the fastest growing
What is wrong
• Profitability issues based on
cash infusion May 2013
• Product lines outside the
category results in less focus
• Foreign manufacture
increases risk for supply
chain
What is right?
• $1B Brand name
established in home care
section
• Heavy marketing funding
available through P&G
• Enhanced access to areas of
store
• Television and print
advertising reaching
customers in new ways and
may increase the market
What is wrong
• P&G requires fast growth or
will kill product line
• Current advertising targets
same market as home lines,
ignores much of the rest of the
market
• Focused on vent clips in car
category and extending spray
from home line
• Home brand advantage not as
strong in auto stores and other
channels
What is right?
• Multiple product categories in
automotive give more
leverage with channel
• Participation in all segments of
car air freshening category
• Assorted with home air care at
mass retailers/grocery as well
as in automotive
• Multiple brands allow larger
ownership of shelf space
• Unique in category Odor
elimination product Ozium
What is wrong?
• Licensed Glade brand
increases cost
• Foreign manufacturing
increases supply chain risk
• Ownership by diverse equity
firm confuses strategy
• Likely limited focus on
innovation
• Multiple brands do not have
separate target markets or
value propositions.
What is right?
• Primarily serves the car
freshener market allowing
focus and flexibility
• Has almost 60 scents available
• Iconic design in the little trees
line with strong trademark
history
• Manufactures and distributes
own line providing flexibility
• Made locally in US and in
Europe
What is Wrong?
• Power of brand mostly in
Paper category which is
losing share of market
• Younger consumers tie to
parents
• Single category limits
leverage with channel
partners
Recommendations
• Emphasize made in America on the packaging
– Move from back of package to the front
• Pursue additional facings in other areas of the store
– Clipstrip/side counter/kicker display in home fragrance
– Seasonal displays with Christmas and garden departments
• Prompt consumers to replace regularly by tying to
other car care tasks like oil change
– Check your tree when you refill your gas
• Continue expanding into new delivery vehicles, scents
and finishes to tie to consumer lifestyle

Category AnalysisM

  • 1.
    Category Analysis Auto AirFresheners Martin Jackson
  • 2.
    Current Market • CarAir Freshener total US market was $450M in 2013 – Grew ~8% from 2012 – Fastest Growing type is vent clips and sticks +18% YOY – Paper fresheners still hold the overall lead +8% $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 Auto Air Freshener Revenue $M 2012 2013
  • 3.
    Current Market Share •Confusion over market leader – Car-Freshner claims “Global Leader in automotive air fresheners” – Handstands claims “the #1 NPD market share producer in the USA” – Kline Group lists P&G as the leading marketer in the category – Auto Expressions claims “dominates the Air Freshener Market across US and Canada with approx 43% market share” • Very diverse channels but ~75% is focused on a few retailers
  • 4.
    Potential Market • Alot of potential for growth • Market facing new entrants seeking to pick up share – P&G bringing the $1B brand febreeze into the category – Bath and Body Works and Yankee Candle offerings for auto scents in their mall stores as well as expanding them into other large retailers $450 M Category Revenue ÷ 244 M Vehicles registered in US $1.84 Spent per Vehicle 244 M Vehicles registered in US X 12 months X $1 Average cost for air freshener $2.9 B Maximum Total Market
  • 5.
    What is right? •Targeting 3 distinct target markets with 3 brands • 28 patents for air care products protects design • Wide distribution • Product designs project lifestyle and image for consumer • Kline Group claims they are the fastest growing What is wrong • Profitability issues based on cash infusion May 2013 • Product lines outside the category results in less focus • Foreign manufacture increases risk for supply chain
  • 6.
    What is right? •$1B Brand name established in home care section • Heavy marketing funding available through P&G • Enhanced access to areas of store • Television and print advertising reaching customers in new ways and may increase the market What is wrong • P&G requires fast growth or will kill product line • Current advertising targets same market as home lines, ignores much of the rest of the market • Focused on vent clips in car category and extending spray from home line • Home brand advantage not as strong in auto stores and other channels
  • 7.
    What is right? •Multiple product categories in automotive give more leverage with channel • Participation in all segments of car air freshening category • Assorted with home air care at mass retailers/grocery as well as in automotive • Multiple brands allow larger ownership of shelf space • Unique in category Odor elimination product Ozium What is wrong? • Licensed Glade brand increases cost • Foreign manufacturing increases supply chain risk • Ownership by diverse equity firm confuses strategy • Likely limited focus on innovation • Multiple brands do not have separate target markets or value propositions.
  • 8.
    What is right? •Primarily serves the car freshener market allowing focus and flexibility • Has almost 60 scents available • Iconic design in the little trees line with strong trademark history • Manufactures and distributes own line providing flexibility • Made locally in US and in Europe What is Wrong? • Power of brand mostly in Paper category which is losing share of market • Younger consumers tie to parents • Single category limits leverage with channel partners
  • 9.
    Recommendations • Emphasize madein America on the packaging – Move from back of package to the front • Pursue additional facings in other areas of the store – Clipstrip/side counter/kicker display in home fragrance – Seasonal displays with Christmas and garden departments • Prompt consumers to replace regularly by tying to other car care tasks like oil change – Check your tree when you refill your gas • Continue expanding into new delivery vehicles, scents and finishes to tie to consumer lifestyle