The document provides an overview of the process for transferring a cable franchise from one operator to another. It explains that franchising authorities have the right to approve or deny franchise transfers. This allows authorities to address outstanding issues and seek modifications as approval conditions. However, approving transfers too readily could limit the authority's ability to consider an operator's past performance during future renewal evaluations. The document provides guidance on leveraging the transfer process to benefit the community, outlines procedural and legal requirements, and addresses frequently asked questions about the transfer process.
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s annual Spring Meeting in Washington, D.C., we presented “Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government and its Counsel.”
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s 80th Annual Conference in Las Vegas earlier this month, BB&K Partner Gail Karish presented “Developments in Wireless.” In her presentation (below), Gail uses industry data to show the tremendous growth in wireless infrastructure in recent years. Besides explaining why, she also discusses how recent court decisions, the FCC’s new shot clock and various state laws are impacting local government control over wireless facilities siting.
Cellphone Tower Regulation: Maximizing Revenue While Protecting Local InterestsBest Best and Krieger LLP
Joseph Van Eaton and Gerry Lederer, partners in the BB&K Washington, D.C. office, recently conducted an educational program on regulatory and transactional concerns arising from the siting or collocation of a wireless tower. The presentation focused on the impact of new FCC rules limiting local authority to control modifications of existing wireless facilities on siting regulation and on negotiations for use of public property to place wireless facilities.
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s annual Spring Meeting in Washington, D.C., we presented “Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government and its Counsel.”
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s 80th Annual Conference in Las Vegas earlier this month, BB&K Partner Gail Karish presented “Developments in Wireless.” In her presentation (below), Gail uses industry data to show the tremendous growth in wireless infrastructure in recent years. Besides explaining why, she also discusses how recent court decisions, the FCC’s new shot clock and various state laws are impacting local government control over wireless facilities siting.
Cellphone Tower Regulation: Maximizing Revenue While Protecting Local InterestsBest Best and Krieger LLP
Joseph Van Eaton and Gerry Lederer, partners in the BB&K Washington, D.C. office, recently conducted an educational program on regulatory and transactional concerns arising from the siting or collocation of a wireless tower. The presentation focused on the impact of new FCC rules limiting local authority to control modifications of existing wireless facilities on siting regulation and on negotiations for use of public property to place wireless facilities.
The big events relating to local telecommunications facility regulation and how they fit together; history of Section 332; subsequent case law; the FCC's "shot clock" ruling and Supreme Court case; other pieces to the puzzle.
The Federal Communications Commission is considering adopting rules that could limit local governments’ zoning authority and allow wireless-service providers to add facilities to existing buildings, towers, and other structures in public rights-of-way and elsewhere. The wireless industry will likely push the federal agency to adopt rules that will allow them to place and expand facilities with little or no oversight.
The most common stumbling points and effective ways to get past them; DAS system leasing for in-building networks as a growth area; advice on problematic situations of concern to members of the audience
What Issues are Building and How Do They Affect Local Governments at 2013 International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Meeting
Teleommunications Policy in an IP World
The big events relating to local permitting of wireless telecommunications facilities and how they fit together: Case law; the FCC "shot clock" ruling and Supreme Court case; Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief Act and follow-on court decisions
Overview of what an IP transition is: the replacement of traditional public switched telephone network with a network based around the IP protocol — a packet-switched v. a circuit switched network. The purpose of the switch is to bring potentially more efficiency and purpose to the network via wireless or wireline — or a combination of both — networks.
Navigating the Internet Protocol Transition
National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) Annual Conference
What are the implications of the IP transition for local franchising, fees, universal service, consumer protection and related areas.
The Wheeler Federal Communications Commission - 2014 Outlook on Congress and ...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Demise of Title II regulation and the rise of net neutrality?
"Best Practices" or Federal Preemption and shot clocks for zoning and permitting?
FCC “Process Reform” proposals
2014 Outlook on Congress and the FCC
Tim Denton is the Commissioner of the CRTC (Canadian FCC). He spoke on Session 5: Muni Fiber Super Session at the Freedom to Connect 2009 conference.
If you'd like more info about the conference, see
http://freedom-to-connect.net/
The big events relating to local telecommunications facility regulation and how they fit together; history of Section 332; subsequent case law; the FCC's "shot clock" ruling and Supreme Court case; other pieces to the puzzle.
The Federal Communications Commission is considering adopting rules that could limit local governments’ zoning authority and allow wireless-service providers to add facilities to existing buildings, towers, and other structures in public rights-of-way and elsewhere. The wireless industry will likely push the federal agency to adopt rules that will allow them to place and expand facilities with little or no oversight.
The most common stumbling points and effective ways to get past them; DAS system leasing for in-building networks as a growth area; advice on problematic situations of concern to members of the audience
What Issues are Building and How Do They Affect Local Governments at 2013 International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Meeting
Teleommunications Policy in an IP World
The big events relating to local permitting of wireless telecommunications facilities and how they fit together: Case law; the FCC "shot clock" ruling and Supreme Court case; Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief Act and follow-on court decisions
Overview of what an IP transition is: the replacement of traditional public switched telephone network with a network based around the IP protocol — a packet-switched v. a circuit switched network. The purpose of the switch is to bring potentially more efficiency and purpose to the network via wireless or wireline — or a combination of both — networks.
Navigating the Internet Protocol Transition
National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) Annual Conference
What are the implications of the IP transition for local franchising, fees, universal service, consumer protection and related areas.
The Wheeler Federal Communications Commission - 2014 Outlook on Congress and ...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Demise of Title II regulation and the rise of net neutrality?
"Best Practices" or Federal Preemption and shot clocks for zoning and permitting?
FCC “Process Reform” proposals
2014 Outlook on Congress and the FCC
Tim Denton is the Commissioner of the CRTC (Canadian FCC). He spoke on Session 5: Muni Fiber Super Session at the Freedom to Connect 2009 conference.
If you'd like more info about the conference, see
http://freedom-to-connect.net/
Escrow document transfer disclosures in Californiamarkpetrie1
A presentation on how to properly respond on behalf of a community association to a homeowner's request for documents in connection with an escrow transaction in California.
How Do Municipalities Comply with the FCC’s New Rule on Small Cell Wireless D...Meyers Nave
California municipalities are constantly faced with a changing regulatory framework related to the next generation of wireless services, known as 5G, which requires installing vast numbers of small cell equipment. These new networks present completely different local regulatory issues than the 3G and 4G networks of the past, which involved constructing large towers with a coverage range of a few miles. Supporting advanced 4G and new 5G requires telecommunications companies to build thousands of small cells at a faster pace with a far greater density of deployment. Municipalities’ policies and ordinances must keep up with this fast-changing technology.
The FCC recently adopted a new “Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order” that interprets provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to preempt local regulations that effectively prohibit the deployment of small cell wireless infrastructure in local communities. The FCC Ruling includes broad definitions of the types of local regulations that would be presumed to constitute an impermissible effective prohibition of wireless services, and establishes the applicable “shot clock” timelines by which local agencies must take action on small cell deployment applications.
Meyers Nave attorneys Jason Rosenberg and Claire Lai provided a webinar that explains the important new obligations for California municipalities. Their webinar covers rule violation, fees & charges, non-fee requirements, shot clocks, and grandfathering.
Fischetti Law Group is here to provide you with the legal guidance and resources needed for a variety of practice areas, no matter what happened. Our experienced professionals are qualified in a range of services, from car accidents to nursing home abuse, personal injury protection payouts, and homeowners insurance claims. Rest assured that your case will be handled by an expert. Take advantage of our broad list of services today!
Our attorneys primarily litigate cases related to homeowner’s insurance claims, personal injury protection (PIP), insurance claims, and bodily injury and/or harm caused by negligence. This includes car accidents, nursing home abuse, and slip-and-fall accidents. If you’re not sure if we can help you with your case, contact us today to find out more information. We’re available every Monday through Friday from 8:30 am to 6:00 pm. We can also schedule a time to meet with you on the weekends if that’s preferred.
Our present locations include Fort Pierce Attorney Office (satellite offices) and Boynton Beach Florida Attorney Office (central hub and primary office location). However, we’ve taken cases throughout the entire state of Florida.
The President of India has promulgated Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 on 23.10.2015 bringing revolutionary changes i.e. no more departmental arbitrators, case to be completed within 12 months etc.
When the Chair is Empty… How Do We Provide FAPE When Students Aren’t In School?Best Best and Krieger LLP
Chronic Absenteeism and Truancy:
1) Why Do We Care So Much?
2) Applicable Rules Requiring District Action.
3) Legal Challenges and Practical Ways to Successfully Blend Statutory Obligations to Help Ensure Student Success.
Background on cell tower growth, current and developing framework for managing wireless development, planning for the future and negotiating leases and licenses for facilities.
Best Best & Krieger LLP attorney Sarah Owsowitz and Matt Klopfenstein, the legislative and legal advisor at Gonzalez, Quintana, Hunter & Cruz, LLC, recently presented a Legislative Update to the Association of Environmental Professionals San Francisco Bay Area Chapter.
On-Body Cameras: Answering Tough Questions from Empirical and Legal StandardsBest Best and Krieger LLP
Best Best & Krieger attorney Jordan E.A. Ferguson delivered a presentation titled, "On-Body Cameras: Answering Tough Questions from Empirical and Legal Standards." In his presentation (below), Jordan discusses the promises and challenges of law enforcement use of body-worn cameras, establishing policies surrounding their use and the privacy, data retention and criminal justice issues that go along with them.
The Sharing Economy: Uber and Airbnb – Can They Exist in a Regulated World? W...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Best Best & Krieger attorney Jordan Ferguson was part of a panel discussion entitled, “The Sharing Economy: Uber and Airbnb – Can They Exist in a Regulated World? Will They Save of Destroy Your Community?” The panelists discussed how cities have responded to the emergence of the sharing economy with everything from new ordinances to expanded code enforcement efforts. Learn more about the sharing economy in the presentation (below). www.bbklaw.com
How communities can protect themselves and their citizens through local reviews of the proposed merger (where permitted by a local franchise or state law); and by filing comments with the Federal Communications Commission, to either deny the merger, or to establish merger conditions.
Topics discussed:
- New Legislation - Private Employers
- New Legislation - Public Employers
- Wage and Hour Law
- Disability, Discrimination and Medical Leaves
- Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Religion in the Workplace
- Update: Public Agency Case Studies
BB&K Labor & Employment Practice Group Presenters:
Alison Alpert, Partner (San Diego, CA)
Cynthia Germano, Partner (Riverside, CA)
Joseph Ortiz, Partner (Riverside, CA)
Arlene Prater, Partner (San Diego, CA)
Lowell Zeta, Associate (Riverside, CA)
Public Private Partnerships: From Economic Development to Local-Serving Infr...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Local jurisdictions are considering (and developer are encouraging) various forms of public-private partnerships to attract and sustain economic development. In California there is growth in the use of P3’s for local serving infrastructure procurement (water, wastewater, etc.) and evaluation of various local authority (zoning, land use, police power, etc.) to replace redevelopment and tax increment financing.
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
Implicitly or explicitly all competing businesses employ a strategy to select a mix
of marketing resources. Formulating such competitive strategies fundamentally
involves recognizing relationships between elements of the marketing mix (e.g.,
price and product quality), as well as assessing competitive and market conditions
(i.e., industry structure in the language of economics).
B2B payments are rapidly changing. Find out the 5 key questions you need to be asking yourself to be sure you are mastering B2B payments today. Learn more at www.BlueSnap.com.
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptxJeremyPeirce1
Discover the top mailing list providers in the USA, offering targeted lists, segmentation, and analytics to optimize your marketing campaigns and drive engagement.
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and TemplatesAurelien Domont, MBA
This Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit was created by ex-McKinsey, Deloitte and BCG Management Consultants, after more than 5,000 hours of work. It is considered the world's best & most comprehensive Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit. It includes all the Frameworks, Best Practices & Templates required to successfully undertake the Digital Transformation of your organization and define a robust IT Strategy.
Editable Toolkit to help you reuse our content: 700 Powerpoint slides | 35 Excel sheets | 84 minutes of Video training
This PowerPoint presentation is only a small preview of our Toolkits. For more details, visit www.domontconsulting.com
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024FelixPerez547899
This session provided an update as to the latest valuation data in the UK and then delved into a discussion on the upcoming election and the impacts on valuation. We finished, as always with a Q&A
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesHolger Mueller
Holger Mueller of Constellation Research shares his key takeaways from SAP's Sapphire confernece, held in Orlando, June 3rd till 5th 2024, in the Orange Convention Center.
1. www.BBKlaw.com
Indian Wells | Irvine | Los Angeles | Ontario | Riverside | Sacramento | San Diego | Walnut Creek | Washington, D.C.
Municipal Cable Franchise Transfer Toolkit
By Gail Karish and Joseph Van Eaton
4/14
A cable operator generally cannot transfer control of
its business or transfer its cable franchise without the
prior approval of the franchising authority. This gives
the franchising authority the opportunity to resolve
outstanding problems and to seek franchise modifications
as conditions of approval. But there are also risks. A
franchising authority can unwittingly cut off its ability to
evaluatethetransferor’sperformanceduringasubsequent
franchise renewal if it approves a transfer incautiously, or
even face a lawsuit if it denies a transfer request. Every
transfer request should be very carefully evaluated.
To help local governments understand the importance of
thecabletransferprocess,BestBest&Kriegerhasprepared
this“toolkit”toprovidesomebasicinformationconcerning
applicable transfer requirements and procedures. The
toolkit includes an overview of the cable transfer process,
a brief explanation of why a transfer might benefit your
community, responses to frequently asked questions, and
three resources for useful information.
Until recently, cable franchises were granted only by local
franchising authorities, such as cities and counties, and
the toolkit is geared toward those jurisdictions. Some
states have adopted a state video franchising regime in
which the franchising authority (and local jurisdictions)
may have very limited authority (or no authority) to
review cable transfers. In those states with limited
transfer review authority, there still may be opportunities
to comment on the transfer, but those may lie in other
fora such as the Federal Communications Commission or
the U.S. Department of Justice.
Overview of the Transfer Process
General Considerations
A franchise is a contract with the cable operator and the
franchising authority is entitled to full performance of its
terms. The franchising authority can and should demand
the benefit of its bargain. A franchise holder in default has
little, if any, right to expect approval of a transfer.
When a franchise holder requests permission to transfer
its franchise, the franchising authority normally has broad
discretion to say no. The franchise holder wants something
only you can give. Before consenting, the franchising
authority should conclude that the transfer will benefit
the local community.
The franchising authority can exert substantial leverage
during the transfer process. It may be appropriate to insist
on new franchise requirements to protect the community
fromtherisksandproblemsassociatedwithanewoperator.
A local franchising authority often has broad discretion
2. www.BBKlaw.com
to deny a transfer if the proposed transaction poses a
risk that the community will not receive exactly what it
anticipated when it selected the original franchise holder.
State and Local - Substantive Requirements
State and local law generally establish the substantive
legal basis for granting or denying a transfer request.
The franchise agreement may provide guidance. And there
may be specific state statutes or court decisions that set
the standards for review and approval of transfer requests.
In some cases, the franchising authority may have broad
discretion to grant or deny any transfer request. In other
cases, there may be specific standards the franchising
authority must consider and apply. Because cable
operators are first amendment speakers, denials should
not be based on the content of the programming carried
on the cable system.
Not all transactions are equal. For instance, a franchising
authority’srighttoapproveordisapproveofatransfermay
vary for an asset sale, for a stock sale, and for transactions
affecting the corporate parent of the franchise holder.
Federal Law – Procedural Requirements
Federal statutes do not set substantive standards for
approving or denying a transfer, and courts have reviewed
local denials with deference. For example, in Charter
Communs., Inc. v. County of Santa Cruz, 304 F.3d 927, 933
(9th Cir. 2002), the court found that a denial “should be
upheld as long as there is substantial evidence for any one
sufficient reason for denial.” In addition to relying on state
law authority, a franchising authority may deny a transfer
under 47 U.S.C. subsection 533(d) if: the transferee owns
or controls another cable system in the municipality, or
the proposed transaction would eliminate or reduce
competition in the delivery of cable service.
Federal law does establish several mandatory procedures.
A franchising authority must act within
120 days of receipt of a completed
transfer application on FCC Form 394,
and all information required by the
franchise authority.
The parties may agree to extend the 120-day deadline. If
the franchise authority does not act within 120 days, the
request will be deemed approved. (See 47 C.F.R. §76.502
and 47 U.S.C. §537.)
The Form 394 often does not provide enough information
to allow a community to evaluate an application. A
locality should be able to request additional information,
if permitted under the franchise, or state or local
law. However, the FCC has asserted that a request for
additional information does not toll (or delay) the 120-day
deadline. (Implementation of Sections 11 and 13 of the
Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act
of 1992: Horizontal and Vertical Ownership Limits, Cross-
Ownership Limitations and Anti-Trafficking Provisions, FCC
93-332, 73 R.R.2d 627 (P&F) (1993) at paragraph 86.)
FCC rules also state that a “franchise authority that
questions the accuracy of the information provided [on
the Form 394]…must notify the cable operator within 30
days of the filing of such information, or such information
shall be deemed accepted, unless the cable operator has
failed to provide any additional information reasonably
requested by the franchise authority within 10 days of
such request.” The effect of this provision is unclear. One
reading is that it requires a locality to notify the operator
as to whether the application is complete within 30 days
(the operator has 10 days to cure the incompleteness).
Some operators take the position that the reference to
“accuracy” requires the locality to ask any questions it
has about the application within 30 days. As a matter of
caution, it is important to send a well-crafted letter to the
operator within 30 days to ensure that the locality may
fully investigate the transfer.
Federal law may also prevent you from recovering your
3. www.BBKlaw.com
additional consultant fees and attorney’s fees directly
from the cable operators absent a law that would allow
your community to recover similar fees in reviewing
transfer applications from other entities with whom
the community may have a franchise (electric or gas
companies, for example). The FCC has determined
that such fees, imposed upon a cable operator solely
because of its status as such, are not “incidental to” the
enforcement of the franchise, and therefore generally
must be treated as franchise fees (which are capped at
5%). (In re Implementation of Section 621(a)(1), 22 FCC
Rcd. 19633 paragraph 11 (2007).)
Why a Transfer May Benefit Your Community
In the realm of cable television regulation, cable
transfersareuniquebecausefranchising
authorities have greater bargaining
power than cable operators. The balance
of power shifts because a cable operator generally
requires the prior consent of the franchising authority
to the transfer. In contrast to franchise renewals and
non-compliance enforcement, the operator in a transfer
is seeking to alter the status quo. Unless the franchising
authority approves the transaction, the closing of the
overall transaction may be delayed or it may prevent the
seller from claiming the purchase price for the system.
The seller therefore has a major incentive to enter into
good faith negotiations with the franchising authority.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is the sale of stock in a franchise holder the same as
a transfer of a franchise?
No, but both can be “transfers” requiring franchising
authority approval. Since the concept of a “transfer”
is not defined in the Federal Cable Act, the answer to
this question depends on how a franchise agreement,
or state or local law, treats a particular transaction.
Many franchise agreements and cable ordinances
define “transfers” to include “changes of control” of
a franchise holder. Moreover, there is wide variation
in the definition of what constitutes a change in
control. In some instances, a “change of control” may
be deemed to have occurred if a certain percentage
of a company’s stock transfers; in others, the test
may be whether the transaction changes the working
control or management control of an organization;
and in some franchises both sorts of tests are used.
A transfer provision that only covers actual franchise
transfers would not necessarily reach transactions
where one company takes over another through an
acquisition of stock (a common occurrence), because
the same corporate entity would technically still hold
the franchise. Hence, determining your right to review
a transaction will begin with a review of the franchise
agreement, and any applicable state law, in light of
the nature of the transaction proposed.
2. How long does a franchising authority have to act on
a transfer request?
Under federal law, a franchising authority has at least
120 days to act on a transfer application. This review
period can be extended by agreement of the parties.
If a franchising authority does not act within 120 days,
the cable operator’s transfer request may be deemed
approved.
3. When does the 120-day review period begin?
The 120-day review period begins to run from the
date a local franchising authority receives a completed
transfer application on FCC Form 394 including all
of the information “required . . . by the franchising
authority.” (47 U.S.C. §537). Incomplete applications
will not trigger the 120-day deadline. When the
application is “complete” can be a source of dispute
between the franchising authority and the applicant.
Franchising authorities can request information
that is not required by Form 394 or any information
4. www.BBKlaw.com
required by a franchise agreement. However, the FCC
apparently believes that such a request does not toll
the 120-day deadline.(Implementation of Sections 11
and 13 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection
and Competition Act of 1992: Horizontal and Vertical
Ownership Limits, Cross-Ownership Limitations and
Anti-Trafficking Provisions, Report and Order and
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92-
264, 73 R.R.2d 627 (P&F), 4 (Rel. July 23, 1993).)
4. Can the franchising authority get more information
than the cable operator provides in FCC Form 394?
Asstatedabove,acableoperatormustprovidetransfer
information that is required by the franchise authority.
Franchising authorities can request additional
information beyond what is included in FCC Form 394
or required by a franchise agreement. Cable operators
are generally obligated to respond promptly to such
requests by completely and accurately submitting all
information reasonably requested.
5. The cable operator says this transaction is a simple
pro forma restructuring. Should the franchising
authority waive the transfer approval requirements?
No. Every proposed transfer that is subject to review
should be carefully reviewed to assure, at a minimum,
that the transaction will not affect the community’s
rightsunderthefranchise,orresultinawaiverofclaims
and past non-compliance problems. The franchising
authority should review even a pro forma transfer to
ensure that it will not have a negative impact on the
quality of service or the franchise holder’s ability to
fulfill its franchise obligations. Moreover, a waiver of
authority to deny a transfer could create a precedent
for a later transfer. And it will deprive a community
of a substantial opportunity to understand the true
nature and financial capability of the operator.
6. The franchise gives the franchising authority the right
of first refusal to buy the cable system in the event
of a proposed sale. Should the franchising authority
exercise that right?
The answer to this question will vary with each
transaction. Whether a right to purchase a system
has value or should be pursued depends, in part, on
the mechanism in the franchise for purchasing the
system, and on the context of the sale. Rights of first
refusal in franchise agreements have been upheld in
some but not all circumstances in bankruptcy sales.
(In re Adelphia Communications Corp., 359 B.R. 65
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007).) San Antonio negotiated a $25
million sale of its right to purchase the system at the
time of a transfer. If the sale price is reasonable, the
municipality may be presented with an opportunity to
benefit the entire community by exercising its right to
purchase. Many communities have chosen to operate
their own cable system to control rate increases to
subscribers and to correct operational and service
quality deficiencies in a particular system. On the
other hand, a municipality must carefully consider
whether it is prepared to assume the financial and
operational responsibilities of operating a cable
system (e.g., dedicating qualified technical personnel,
making the necessary capital investments in new
technologies, negotiating programming contracts,
responding to consumer inquiries). In any event, a
municipality should perform a due diligence review
prior to purchasing a cable system to ensure that it
would be a prudent investment.
7. Does a transfer have any effect on franchise renewal?
Transfers can have a significant and adverse impact
on franchise renewal. A transfer can cut off a
local franchising authority’s ability to consider the
transferor’s performance once the transaction is
consummated. In this regard, the legislative history to
the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 states
that a local franchising authority should “consider
the operator’s performance over the life of the
franchise, unless the franchise has been transferred
with the franchising authority’s consent. In that case,
the applicable period of consideration would be the
period in which the franchise was held by the operator
5. www.BBKlaw.com
seeking renewal.” (H.R. Rep. No. 934, 98th Cong., 2d
Sess. at 74 (1984), reprinted in 1984 U.S.C.C.A.N.
4655, 4711.) If a local franchising authority is limited
in evaluating the purchaser’s past performance, it is
much more difficult to deny renewal. Consequently,
before approving any transfer, a municipality should
require the purchaser to commit, in writing, to assume
all of the seller’s obligations and liabilities, known and
unknown.
8. What can a local franchising authority do if it learns
of an illegal transfer or if a cable operator threatens
to consummate a transfer without prior consent?
If a cable operator consummates a transfer without
prior consent (assuming such consent is required), a
franchising authority can avail itself of any remedies
available under a franchise agreement or applicable
law. For instance, a franchising authority could
impose any applicable penalties, require the payment
of liquidated damages, or revoke the franchise. A
franchising authority could also sue an operator for
breach of contract, and seek monetary damages or
equitable relief (e.g., requiring the operator to follow
the transfer or right-of-first-refusal procedures in the
franchise agreement). If a cable operator threatens
to ignore a prior consent requirement, a franchising
authority should prepare to initiate the enforcement
process (e.g., by scheduling any necessary
hearings), and inform the operator, in writing, that
noncompliance will not be tolerated.
9. What can a cable operator do if a franchising
authority denies a transfer?
A franchising authority’s disapproval of a transfer is
often challenged under a “tortious interference with
contractual relations” theory. The issues under this
theory are whether: (i) the franchising authority acted
within its powers in the actions it took to protect its
rights under the franchise; and (ii) the franchising
authority followed a process reasonably related to the
protection of its interests. A cable operator could also
sue a franchising authority and seek injunctive relief
(preventing the franchising authority from stopping
the transfer) or equitable relief ( requiring the
franchising authority to approve the transfer). Finally,
a cable operator could seek monetary damages
from the franchising authority. It should be noted,
however, that federal law immunizes local franchising
authorities from damage suits prompted by the
disapproval of a transfer request. This immunity does
not apply to injunctive or declaratory relief.
Three Resources
1. Federal Law:
Here are key code provisions:
• 47 U.S.C. § 547 (sales of cable systems)
• 47 U.S.C. § 533 (ownership restrictions)
• 47 U.S.C. § 555a (local franchising authority
immunity from damage suits)
The FCC’s main regulation is here:
• 47 C.F.R. § 76.502
The FCC’s Form 394 “Application for Franchise
Authority – Consent to Assignment or Transfer of
Control of Cable Television Franchise” is available
here:
• www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form394/394.xls
2. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Quite
often, your cable operator (or its parent) is a public
company required to file annual and quarterly
investor reports (Form 10-K, Form 10-Q), and reports
on major events (Form 8-K) with the federal SEC. The
SEC web site (http://www.sec.gov) can provide useful
information about a particular operator and proposed
transfers. Form 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filings can be
accessed directly at http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.
3. Cable Operator Transfer Documents: The transfer
documents you receive from your cable operator are
excellent sources of information. You should carefully
examine the description and terms of the proposed
transaction to determine how the transfer will affect
both you and consumers.