This document summarizes key issues regarding communications laws and their effects on local authority. It discusses how federal laws have increasingly impacted local control over wireless facilities, compensation for use of public property, broadband deployment, and ensuring adequate communications services. It recommends that local governments review and revise ordinances, participate in federal proceedings, and devote resources to take advantage of rights and develop policy goals reflecting the changing landscape. It also provides an overview of relevant federal provisions and cases, and identifies risks to local revenues and public interest obligations from emerging technologies and proceedings.
The big events relating to local permitting of wireless telecommunications facilities and how they fit together: Case law; the FCC "shot clock" ruling and Supreme Court case; Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief Act and follow-on court decisions
Cellphone Tower Regulation: Maximizing Revenue While Protecting Local InterestsBest Best and Krieger LLP
Joseph Van Eaton and Gerry Lederer, partners in the BB&K Washington, D.C. office, recently conducted an educational program on regulatory and transactional concerns arising from the siting or collocation of a wireless tower. The presentation focused on the impact of new FCC rules limiting local authority to control modifications of existing wireless facilities on siting regulation and on negotiations for use of public property to place wireless facilities.
The Federal Communications Commission is considering adopting rules that could limit local governments’ zoning authority and allow wireless-service providers to add facilities to existing buildings, towers, and other structures in public rights-of-way and elsewhere. The wireless industry will likely push the federal agency to adopt rules that will allow them to place and expand facilities with little or no oversight.
The most common stumbling points and effective ways to get past them; DAS system leasing for in-building networks as a growth area; advice on problematic situations of concern to members of the audience
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s 80th Annual Conference in Las Vegas earlier this month, BB&K Partner Gail Karish presented “Developments in Wireless.” In her presentation (below), Gail uses industry data to show the tremendous growth in wireless infrastructure in recent years. Besides explaining why, she also discusses how recent court decisions, the FCC’s new shot clock and various state laws are impacting local government control over wireless facilities siting.
The big events relating to local telecommunications facility regulation and how they fit together; history of Section 332; subsequent case law; the FCC's "shot clock" ruling and Supreme Court case; other pieces to the puzzle.
The big events relating to local permitting of wireless telecommunications facilities and how they fit together: Case law; the FCC "shot clock" ruling and Supreme Court case; Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief Act and follow-on court decisions
Cellphone Tower Regulation: Maximizing Revenue While Protecting Local InterestsBest Best and Krieger LLP
Joseph Van Eaton and Gerry Lederer, partners in the BB&K Washington, D.C. office, recently conducted an educational program on regulatory and transactional concerns arising from the siting or collocation of a wireless tower. The presentation focused on the impact of new FCC rules limiting local authority to control modifications of existing wireless facilities on siting regulation and on negotiations for use of public property to place wireless facilities.
The Federal Communications Commission is considering adopting rules that could limit local governments’ zoning authority and allow wireless-service providers to add facilities to existing buildings, towers, and other structures in public rights-of-way and elsewhere. The wireless industry will likely push the federal agency to adopt rules that will allow them to place and expand facilities with little or no oversight.
The most common stumbling points and effective ways to get past them; DAS system leasing for in-building networks as a growth area; advice on problematic situations of concern to members of the audience
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s 80th Annual Conference in Las Vegas earlier this month, BB&K Partner Gail Karish presented “Developments in Wireless.” In her presentation (below), Gail uses industry data to show the tremendous growth in wireless infrastructure in recent years. Besides explaining why, she also discusses how recent court decisions, the FCC’s new shot clock and various state laws are impacting local government control over wireless facilities siting.
The big events relating to local telecommunications facility regulation and how they fit together; history of Section 332; subsequent case law; the FCC's "shot clock" ruling and Supreme Court case; other pieces to the puzzle.
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s annual Spring Meeting in Washington, D.C., we presented “Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government and its Counsel.”
Background on cell tower growth, current and developing framework for managing wireless development, planning for the future and negotiating leases and licenses for facilities.
What Issues are Building and How Do They Affect Local Governments at 2013 International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Meeting
Teleommunications Policy in an IP World
The Truth about Wired and Wireless: Key Legal and Regulatory Issues by Sean S...Gigabit City Summit
The Truth about Wired and Wireless: Key Legal and Regulatory Issues by Sean Stokes of Baller Stokes & Lide was presented at the 2017 Gigabit City Summit.
Overview of what an IP transition is: the replacement of traditional public switched telephone network with a network based around the IP protocol — a packet-switched v. a circuit switched network. The purpose of the switch is to bring potentially more efficiency and purpose to the network via wireless or wireline — or a combination of both — networks.
Navigating the Internet Protocol Transition
National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) Annual Conference
What are the implications of the IP transition for local franchising, fees, universal service, consumer protection and related areas.
On July 14, 2014, the decree by virtue of which the Federal Law on Telecommunications and Broadcasting, and the Law of the Public System of Mexican Broadcasting, as well as other amendments, supplements and repeals to other related telecommunications and broadcasting legal provisions were enacted, was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. The Decree became effective 3on August 13, 2014.
The Wheeler Federal Communications Commission - 2014 Outlook on Congress and ...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Demise of Title II regulation and the rise of net neutrality?
"Best Practices" or Federal Preemption and shot clocks for zoning and permitting?
FCC “Process Reform” proposals
2014 Outlook on Congress and the FCC
What the TYPO3 Server Admin Team does for the community and how we work inside the team.
Presentation at TYPO3 Camp Mallorca
14 - 16.09.2012, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s annual Spring Meeting in Washington, D.C., we presented “Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government and its Counsel.”
Background on cell tower growth, current and developing framework for managing wireless development, planning for the future and negotiating leases and licenses for facilities.
What Issues are Building and How Do They Affect Local Governments at 2013 International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Meeting
Teleommunications Policy in an IP World
The Truth about Wired and Wireless: Key Legal and Regulatory Issues by Sean S...Gigabit City Summit
The Truth about Wired and Wireless: Key Legal and Regulatory Issues by Sean Stokes of Baller Stokes & Lide was presented at the 2017 Gigabit City Summit.
Overview of what an IP transition is: the replacement of traditional public switched telephone network with a network based around the IP protocol — a packet-switched v. a circuit switched network. The purpose of the switch is to bring potentially more efficiency and purpose to the network via wireless or wireline — or a combination of both — networks.
Navigating the Internet Protocol Transition
National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) Annual Conference
What are the implications of the IP transition for local franchising, fees, universal service, consumer protection and related areas.
On July 14, 2014, the decree by virtue of which the Federal Law on Telecommunications and Broadcasting, and the Law of the Public System of Mexican Broadcasting, as well as other amendments, supplements and repeals to other related telecommunications and broadcasting legal provisions were enacted, was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation. The Decree became effective 3on August 13, 2014.
The Wheeler Federal Communications Commission - 2014 Outlook on Congress and ...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Demise of Title II regulation and the rise of net neutrality?
"Best Practices" or Federal Preemption and shot clocks for zoning and permitting?
FCC “Process Reform” proposals
2014 Outlook on Congress and the FCC
What the TYPO3 Server Admin Team does for the community and how we work inside the team.
Presentation at TYPO3 Camp Mallorca
14 - 16.09.2012, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
ksados - Boda Original - Trivial Wedding - Pasosksados
Los cinco pasos para disfrutar de una boda original. Trivial Wedding de ksados os lo pone fácil: haced que los invitados a vuestra boda se diviertan conociéndoos mejor. Se irán gratamente sorprendidos y ayudaréis a que vuestra boda sea especial con un toque muy personal.
Conoce más en www.ksados.com.
Microsoft Dynamics AX7 kolm väärtust - tugev tuum ja integreeritus, kasutajas...Columbus Eesti AS
Kasutus igal ajal, igal pool – Windows, Android, iOS
Väga intuitiivne ja visuaalne kasutajaliides. „Õmblusteta“ integratsioon teiste rakendustega (Office 365, CRM, PowerBI jt)
Rollipõhised „tööruumid“ lahkumata oma kasutajaliideselt.
Vaata lähemalt esitlusest ja tule küsi lisa Columbusest!
How Do Municipalities Comply with the FCC’s New Rule on Small Cell Wireless D...Meyers Nave
California municipalities are constantly faced with a changing regulatory framework related to the next generation of wireless services, known as 5G, which requires installing vast numbers of small cell equipment. These new networks present completely different local regulatory issues than the 3G and 4G networks of the past, which involved constructing large towers with a coverage range of a few miles. Supporting advanced 4G and new 5G requires telecommunications companies to build thousands of small cells at a faster pace with a far greater density of deployment. Municipalities’ policies and ordinances must keep up with this fast-changing technology.
The FCC recently adopted a new “Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order” that interprets provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to preempt local regulations that effectively prohibit the deployment of small cell wireless infrastructure in local communities. The FCC Ruling includes broad definitions of the types of local regulations that would be presumed to constitute an impermissible effective prohibition of wireless services, and establishes the applicable “shot clock” timelines by which local agencies must take action on small cell deployment applications.
Meyers Nave attorneys Jason Rosenberg and Claire Lai provided a webinar that explains the important new obligations for California municipalities. Their webinar covers rule violation, fees & charges, non-fee requirements, shot clocks, and grandfathering.
Brian T. Grogan PowerPoint presentation at the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATAO) 2014 Annual Conference on October 1, 2014
This presentation is from the May 21, 2015 monthly lunch program hosted by the Orange Section of the American Planning Association.
In this presentation, Jonathan Kramer, Esq. and Robert May III, Esq. examine recent changes in local and federal laws affecting how wireless companies deploy new sites and how planners regulate them. This presentation is especially helpful if you're in charge of writing a new wireless ordinance, need a refresher on the "shot clock" rules, or are just plain confused as to how the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (a.k.a. Section 6409) affects you.
When the Chair is Empty… How Do We Provide FAPE When Students Aren’t In School?Best Best and Krieger LLP
Chronic Absenteeism and Truancy:
1) Why Do We Care So Much?
2) Applicable Rules Requiring District Action.
3) Legal Challenges and Practical Ways to Successfully Blend Statutory Obligations to Help Ensure Student Success.
Best Best & Krieger LLP attorney Sarah Owsowitz and Matt Klopfenstein, the legislative and legal advisor at Gonzalez, Quintana, Hunter & Cruz, LLC, recently presented a Legislative Update to the Association of Environmental Professionals San Francisco Bay Area Chapter.
On-Body Cameras: Answering Tough Questions from Empirical and Legal StandardsBest Best and Krieger LLP
Best Best & Krieger attorney Jordan E.A. Ferguson delivered a presentation titled, "On-Body Cameras: Answering Tough Questions from Empirical and Legal Standards." In his presentation (below), Jordan discusses the promises and challenges of law enforcement use of body-worn cameras, establishing policies surrounding their use and the privacy, data retention and criminal justice issues that go along with them.
The Sharing Economy: Uber and Airbnb – Can They Exist in a Regulated World? W...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Best Best & Krieger attorney Jordan Ferguson was part of a panel discussion entitled, “The Sharing Economy: Uber and Airbnb – Can They Exist in a Regulated World? Will They Save of Destroy Your Community?” The panelists discussed how cities have responded to the emergence of the sharing economy with everything from new ordinances to expanded code enforcement efforts. Learn more about the sharing economy in the presentation (below). www.bbklaw.com
How communities can protect themselves and their citizens through local reviews of the proposed merger (where permitted by a local franchise or state law); and by filing comments with the Federal Communications Commission, to either deny the merger, or to establish merger conditions.
Topics discussed:
- New Legislation - Private Employers
- New Legislation - Public Employers
- Wage and Hour Law
- Disability, Discrimination and Medical Leaves
- Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Religion in the Workplace
- Update: Public Agency Case Studies
BB&K Labor & Employment Practice Group Presenters:
Alison Alpert, Partner (San Diego, CA)
Cynthia Germano, Partner (Riverside, CA)
Joseph Ortiz, Partner (Riverside, CA)
Arlene Prater, Partner (San Diego, CA)
Lowell Zeta, Associate (Riverside, CA)
Public Private Partnerships: From Economic Development to Local-Serving Infr...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Local jurisdictions are considering (and developer are encouraging) various forms of public-private partnerships to attract and sustain economic development. In California there is growth in the use of P3’s for local serving infrastructure procurement (water, wastewater, etc.) and evaluation of various local authority (zoning, land use, police power, etc.) to replace redevelopment and tax increment financing.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
2. Special Districts
Key Points
• Federal communications laws, combined with
changes in technology, increasingly affect:
Local authority to control the size and placement of
wireless facilities.
Local authority to obtain fair compensation for use of
valuable public property (the rights of way), and other
key revenue streams.
The availability of adequate communications services
to every member of your community, and the
adequacy of public safety networks.
Local ability to incentivize deployment of broadband
facilities, and to deploy municipal networks.
3. Special Districts
That Translates To…
• A need to review and revise local ordinances (such as zoning
codes) to protect local interests.
• A need to participate in federal proceedings and make local
interests known to elected officials through a long-term
strategy that:
explains why local interests should be protected (it is just about
money?);
explains why protecting and enhancing local authority could
advance national interests in broadband deployments;
challenges inappropriate intrusions on local authority
legislatively and through the courts.
• Devoting the effort and resources required to take
advantage of existing rights, and to develop policy goals that
reflect the new communications environment.
4. Special Districts
A Short Bit of History…
• Communications law was divided into “silos” – different
rules applied to different types of communication:
Television/radio services (licensed and subject to public
interest obligations such as “Fairness Doctrine);
Common carrier, or telecommunications services like
telephony (user controlled all content; carrier simply
carried) – important rights granted to providers in return
for duties to provide universal service via the public
switched telephone network;
Information services (services ancillary to telecom services,
or services that involved computer storage and forwarding
(virtually unregulated); and
Cable television services.
5. Special Districts
A Short Bit of History…
• Significant spectrum was devoted to local pub.
safety and educational uses.
• Technology is making the “silos” obsolete:
Video now delivered over many platforms;
Operators are seeking relief from all common
carrier obligations, and to abandon the public
switched telephone network (PSTN).
• There is a strong national push for deployment
of broadband facilities where rights/obligations
of providers are unclear.
7. Special Districts 7
Major Federal Provisions
• 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7) (Preservation of Local Zoning Authority).
• 47 U.S.C. § 1455 (Section 6409) (Collocation/Modification of Existing
Facilities).
• Section 332(c)(7) applies to “personal wireless service (PWS) facilities,”
which includes commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services,
and common carrier wireless exchange access services.
• Generally preserves local zoning authority, but imposes five limitations:
Shall not “unreasonably discriminate” among providers of functionally
equivalent services (332(c)(7)(B)(i)(I));
Prohibit or effectively prohibit provision of PWS (332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II))
Locality must act on request within “reasonable period of time”;
7
8. Special Districts 8
Section 332(c)(7) (cont’d)
Decision to deny must be “in writing” and supported by “substantial
evidence”; and
No regulation of RF – except may require applicant to satisfy FCC rules
• Limitations do not apply to proprietary property.
• Supreme Court has recently ruled on meaning of “in writing” requirement:
Denial and substantial evidence need not be in same document, but must
be essentially contemporaneous. See, T-MOBILE SOUTH, LLC v. CITY OF
ROSWELL __U.S.__, 135 S.Ct. 808 (2015).
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-975_8n6a.pdf
8
9. Special Districts
Section 6409(a) (47 U.S.C. §1455)
(a) Facility modifications.
(1) In general. Notwithstanding… any other provision of law, a
State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any
eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless
tower or base station that does not substantially change the
physical dimensions of such tower or base station.
(2) Eligible facilities request. For purposes of this subsection, the
term “eligible facilities request” means any request for
modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that
involves—
(A) collocation of new transmission equipment;
(B) removal of transmission equipment; or
(C) replacement of transmission equipment.
9
10. Special Districts
FCC Report and Order
• 155 Page Report and
Order:
Adopted October 17, 2014;
Published in Fed. Register on
January 8, 2015;
Appeal Underway –
Argument Scheduled in 4th
Cir. for October 28;
Now fully effective
10
11. Special Districts
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
1. Substantial Change
Towers other than Right of Way (ROW) towers,
modification:
• Increases height by more than 10% or 20 feet whichever is
greater; or
• Appurtenance added protrudes from body of structure more
than 20 feet or width of tower at pt. of attachment.
All other support structures, modification:
• Increases height by 10 feet or 10%, whichever is greater;
• Appurtenance added protrudes more than 6 feet.
Height measured from facility as it exists as of date of
passage of Act (2012).
11
12. Special Districts
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
(cont’d)
1. Substantial Change For towers and base
stations in ROW:
• New equipment cabinets if there are none, or involves
placement of cabinets 10% greater in height or overall
volume than other cabinets associated with structure.
All other eligible support structures:
• Installation of more than four equipment cabinets.
It entails any excavation or deployment outside of
site.
It would defeat “concealment elements” of the
“eligible support structure.”
12
13. Special Districts
1. Substantial Change (cont’d)
It does not comply with conditions associated with
siting approval…but limitation does not apply to
any modification that is non-compliant only in a
manner that would not exceed thresholds
identified in (i)-(iv).
2. Tower: structure built for sole or primary
purpose of supporting FCC licensed or
authorized antennas and associated
facilities.
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
(cont’d)
13
14. Special Districts
3. Base Station
Equipment associated with wireless comm. service
Antennas, coax, backup power supplies
“any structure other than a tower” that at time of
application was supporting or housing the above
(walls, rooftops are support structures).
4. Existing: A constructed tower or base station
that has been “reviewed and approved under
the applicable zoning or siting process or under
another State or local” process, except towers
not in a zoned area when built, but lawfully
constructed (non-conforming uses?).
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
(cont’d)
14
15. Special Districts
5. Eligible Support Structure is any Tower or Base
Station.
Key Notes:
• Does not preempt generally applicable safety and
health codes.
• Does not apply to proprietary property of
community.
• Reaches all wireless facilities – including Wi-Fi
deployments.
• Reaches Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) &
Small Cells.
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
(cont’d)
15
16. Special Districts
Application Review
• General rule: “may not deny and shall approve” any
eligible facilities request that does not substantially
change physical dimensions.
• Can require “documentation reasonably related” to
determining whether request meets requirements of
section.
• Sixty days to approve UNLESS locality determines facility
is not covered.
• Time frame tolled by agreement; or if notice provided
of incompleteness (30/10) with detailed citation to
requirements.
• Failure to Act = application deemed granted.
• Deemed grant becomes effective after applicant
notifies community that time has passed.
16
17. Special Districts
What Happens After Deemed Grant
• Once community is notified of deemed grant,
it has 30 days to file an appeal in a court of
competent jurisdiction.
• Locality can bring appeal: “when it believes the
underlying application did not meet the
criteria in Section 6409(a) for mandatory
approval, would not comply with applicable
building codes or other non-discretionary
structural and safety codes, or for other
reasons is not appropriately “deemed granted.”
17
18. Special Districts
Sec. 332(c)(7) & 6409 Together
An application that is NOT eligible under Section
6409 may still be subject to consideration under
Section 332(c)(7).
18
19. Special Districts
Do’s
• Examine whether your laws and forms are
consistent with new order (Hint: Probably not).
Clarify in your ordinance/government practice
manual that DAS/small cell applications are entitled
to Shot Clock.
• Consider enactment of an ordinance that
prefers government property for cell locations.
19
20. Special Districts
Do’s
• Proprietary
Ensure everyone in your organization understands
that this order does not grant right of free
collocations on government property.
Ensure that you don’t grant that right in your leases
/licenses by requiring approval in writing of
municipality/Special District.
Ensure that industry does not use new rules as an
excuse to install generators or switch out equipment
at your sites.
• New Site
150 Days
• Collocation
90 Days
• 6409 Collocations
60 Days
• Incompleteness for
6409 (a) & 332(c)(7)
30 Days
20
21. Special Districts
Changes to Your Applications/Process
• More stealth?
• Require applicant provide documentation that is
“reasonably related to determining whether the eligible
facilities request meets the requirements of Section
6409(a).”
Meets size change – including cumulative limit.
Meets any stealth obligations.
Meets any building code/safety/non-discretionary
structural code.
Complies with any condition of approval of
construction or modification imposed on the
applicable wireless tower or base station.
21
22. Special Districts
Don'ts
• Impose a moratorium –
Commission is specific that moratoria will not toll
6409(a) or 332(c)(7) applications.
• Approve without understanding how a facility
may expand – the smallest facility may grow an
additional 10 feet up and 6 feet out.
• Demand documentation for the business need
for the proposed modification or require a
business case for expansion.
22
23. Special Districts
Qs re: wireless
Do you have processes in place that allow you to meet
federal deadlines :
Do you have standards in place that allow you to
impose protective conditions?
Do you have forms and questions in place so you can
get information you need.
Should you re-examine policies for collocation? For
use of public property?
Are you ensuring franchising authority is exercised?
Don’t think of this as a one-off process (Non-
discrimination)
25. Special Districts
Background on franchising
• Cities have broad franchising authority in Oregon
reaching entities that wish to place facilities in RoW
Most notable – cable, where there is also a very detailed
federal law that addresses local franchising authority.
Allows 5% franchise fee on revenues derived from
operation of cable system to provide cable service
Allows PEG channels
Allows PEG support
Allows I-Nets
Cable customer service standards
But what does all that mean when technology is changing?
26. Special Districts
Background on franchising
• Move to IP
• Installation of wireless facilities in home and in
street
• Addition of streaming services
• Reduction in subscribership via traditional cable
model?
• Comcast/Eugene litigation [when you issue a cable
franchise, does it allow installation of all sort of
other facilities and services without add’l fees?]
• Creates a risk – but also an opportunity.
27. Special Districts
Example of Risks to Local
Revenues/Public Interest Obligations
• FCC Proceeding: Promoting Innovation and
Competition in the Provision of Multichannel
Video Programming Distribution Services,
Docket No. MB 14-261.
• https://www.fcc.gov/document/commission-
adopts-mvpd-definition-nprm
28. Special Districts
Overview
• Main issue: What is a multi-channel video service
provider? Does it include entities that sell video
programming services via the Internet (over the
top) like Aereo?
• Classification could allow Internet video providers
to obtain access to programming now denied
them.
• But proceedings could also affect local authority
to obtain compensation for delivery of video
services via traditional cable systems, or to take
advantage of new technologies to “stream” public,
educational and government programming.
29. Special Districts
What Is OTT?
• FCC definition in rulemaking: “linear video
services that travel over the public Internet
and that cable operators do not treat as
managed video services on any cable system.”
• Linear = scheduled and virtually simultaneous
with transmission - not like (traditional) NetFlix
or iTunes.
30. Special Districts
Is OTT provided by a Hulu subject to
cable franchise fees?
• Traditional federally authorized franchise fees
reach “Cable Operators”: entities that own or
control cable systems; a fee can be collected
on revenues derived by an operator from the
operation of the cable system to provide cable
services.
31. Special Districts
What about Cable Operator provided
OTT?
• “Video programming services that a cable
operator may offer over the Internet should not
be regulated as cable services.”
• “If a cable operator delivers video programming
service over the Internet, rather than as a
managed video service over its own facilities, we
tentatively conclude… this entity would be… a
non-cable MVPD under our proposed Linear
Programming Interpretation with respect to its
OTT service.”
32. Special Districts
Why We Care
If not “cable service,” then no franchise fees or
PEG support under Cable Act.
If not cable service, PEG fees can’t be used to
support OTT.
If not cable service not subject to consumer
protections.
Most important: reduces cable service to an
increasingly niche service.
Emphasizes the importance of pending Eugene
case in Oregon Supreme Court.
33. Special Districts
Who Filed Comments?
• This is one of a series of existential threats to
PEG.
• But limited local participation so far: leading
local commenters – Coalition (Anne Arundel
County, MD etc.); City of San Antonio, TX;
Alliance for Community Media. Others: District
of Columbia; American Community Television;
NATOA.
• Comments can still be filed “ex parte.”
34. Special Districts
Franchise Qs you should be asking
• What is our approach to franchising – at
federal, state and local levels
• How are we dealing with technology changes?
• Are we preserving rights to additional
compensation
• Are we including escape clauses that
essentially force requirements DOWN?
• How does this fit in with long-term plans for
communicating with constituency? [not a one
medium solution]
35. Special Districts
Beyond Cable: Broadband Planning
• Significant move by many communities to encourage
deployment through muni investment/attracting private
vendors/P4 process.
Assets
Simplify processes for entering market
Work with public/private players
• Reliance on incumbents not particularly wise.
• But should be part of a broader plan for communications
development – as important as master plans
How am I using communications
How are businesses/residents using
What are my eco development issues
What risks do I face – as PSTN vanishes
How do I minimize risks
36. Special Districts
Other Risks
• FCC Order recently indicated that a cable
operator may be able to claim that “in-kind”
benefits in a franchise (such as requirements
for free or discounted services) are franchise
fees, and count against the federal 5%
franchise fee limits.
• The FCC has a pending proceeding where
telecom companies argue that compensation
for use of the rights of way may be limited to
costs.
37. Special Districts
Other Risks
• The Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA), enacted in 1998
and extended five times will sunset on October 1, 2015.
The House passed H.R. 235, the Permanent Internet Tax
Freedom Act (PITFA), and goes to the Senate for
consideration. The Marketplace Fairness Act. (S. 698;
H.R.2775), provides state and local government with the
authority to impose local sales tax on remote sales.
• Scope of ITFA at issue in Eugene case.
• ACTION NEEDED - Communities should communicate to
their congressional delegation their opposition to H.R.
235 and their support for the Marketplace Fairness Act.
(S. 698; H.R.2775).
38. Special Districts
The Availability of Adequate
Communications Services
• Federal proceedings underway to permit interstate
carriers to abandon the public, switched telephone
network.
• Open issue: will it be replaced by systems that can
support advanced public safety/911 networks; or that
can support basic communications functions without
significant extra charges.
• Open issue: will there be widespread deployment of
advanced communications networks to rural areas
• All issues are subject of ongoing FCC proceedings, and
there will be new proceedings to define what should be
treated as the “lifeline” minimum communications
service available to the public.
39. Special Districts
Local ability to incent broadband
deployment, deploy muni networks
• Issues raised by FCC actions/court proceedings:
Can localities require cable operators to deploy networks to
satisfy broadband needs (Section 621 appeal)?
Can localities price access to right of way or other assets to
incent deployment (Section 253)?
What ensures the public will be able to get information via
the Internet without interference from the network owner
(net neutrality)?
Can localities make advanced facilities available to public?
• Preemption under Section 706;
• Universal service funding.
• You can advance your interest in broadband by
participating at federal level.
40. Special Districts
What You Can Do at Federal Level?
• Submit comments to FCC in key proceedings.
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/ [also where you can
READ existing comments]
• Arrange meetings with Commissioners and
staff.
• Obtain support from local members of
Congress.
• Be prepared to protect your interests if
Eugene wins – operators can be expected to
seek relief from federal agencies.
41. Special Districts
What You Can Do
• Consider adopting policies that will allow your
staff to move promptly to respond in
proceedings that affect local interests.
• Be sure your representatives/federal agencies
understand that the concerns are not just staff
concerns.
• Don’t leave the defense of your interests to a
few communities.
42. Special Districts 42
Joseph Van Eaton
Joseph.VanEaton@bbklaw.com
Best Best & Krieger
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Suite 5300
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: (202) 785-0600
Fax: (202) 785-1234
Cell: (202) 486-0770
Website: www.bbklaw.com
Contact Information