Boston Massacre

Boston Massacre
The British soldiers were anything but loved by the American colonists in the 1770s. They
maliciously planned an attack on the soldiers because of their hate. Many townspeople gathered
together in effort to strike against the British presence. The men were just doing their job trying to
keep order in Boston, but the people still taunted them. The soldiers were being tried for murder
because they fired at the people, but those charges should not have existed. The crowd initially
attacked the soldiers, not the other way around. It was also dark out so the soldiers did not know of
the number of colonist attackers. The soldiers heard the word fire coming from the crowd, confusing
the voices with Captain Preston's. The incident referred to as the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Most of the time it is for the greater good of the strategy put in place. However, in the case of what
happened in Boston, the soldiers heard a different order than what was commanded by Captain
Thomas Preston. According to Newton Prince, the crowd kept daring the soldiers with words such
as "Damn you why don't you fire?" and even called them lobsters. A constant taunting will cause
uneasiness with anyone, causing the feeling of distress. When in a state of distress, it is common for
people to become more sensitive to surroundings and even confuse voices. When hearing the word
"fire" continuously from the crowd, it would only make sense that the soldiers confused one of the
attacker's voices with the captains as it was dark out and hard to tell that it was not the Captain's.
However, it was not the Captain's because multiple witnesses, such as Newton Prince, Matthew
Murray, and Peter Cunningham, were standing within four feet of him and did not hear or see the
word "fire" come from his lips. Captain price did say the words "Don't fire, stop your firing". With
all of the noise coming from the crowd it is possible that the soldiers did not hear the whole sentence
and thought the orders were to continue firing. There was too much commotion for a dark
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Boston Massacre: Cause Of The American Revolution
In studying the Boston Massacre, there are many views of the cause of the event and the effect it had
on American history and the colonies. It is my personal belief that the Boston Massacre was fueled
by the abuse and isolation of the British soldiers and the civil disobedience of the colonial people
that was substantiated by the feelings of their own lack of freedom. The event was used as
propaganda by prominent people such as Paul Revere and Samuel Adams to lead the colonies in a
revolutionary uprising. On the evening of March 5th 1770, a dispute over an accusation of an unpaid
bill to the wigmaker broke out between the wigmakers apprentice, Edward Garrick, and Private
Hugh white, a British soldier. The bill had in fact been settled earlier that day, however insults flew
between Garrick and White. Private White left his post to defend his officers name and White struck
Garrick on the head with his Musket. This drew a crowd, among the crowd was ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
(The Boston Massacre Trials) The description doesn't give me the perception that it was Boston's
finest citizens out in the mob. I would suggest that the people present in this group were engaging in
acts of civil disobedience to show their distaste for the British involvement in their everyday life.
We see the same kind of civil disobedience it the protest and riots that are still present today. Anger
and frustration tend to control people's actions and sometimes isn't manifested in the most
productive ways. The crowd mistreating the British soldiers is just another account of this. If
everyone could express anger, frustration, and opinions honestly and productively we would have a
lot more political issues resolved over round table discussions instead of wars. It's a human nature to
express themselves and show power through rage and

Massacre: The Cause Of The Boston Massacre
The tension was evident in every frame. The British and the colonists were anything, but friendly
towards each other in the spring of 1770.
On March 5, 1770 the Boston Massacre took place. Although, it wasn't even a massacre. A massacre
is defined as the mass–murder of a group of innocent, unaware, unarmed people. What really
happened on that day was a riot. Both sides were armed. The colonists had icy snowballs, chunks of
wood, and oyster shells; while the British soldiers were armed with muskets and bayonets. There is
proof that the Boston Massacre was planned by the colonists and even if it wasn't the colonists did
egg on the soldiers, so they were definitely aware of the fact that they were about to start a riot. And
no one was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Everyone in the 13 colonies had heard about the riot in Boston. But, to the colonists, they saw it as a
massacre because of the iconic picture used by Paul Revere as propaganda. The engraving named
"The Bloody Massacre on King Street, March 5, 1770" was used as propaganda because it portrays
only the British soldiers attacking and the colonists looking scared and defenseless. Also, above the
heads of the British the Customs House was changed into the Butcher's Hall. On horseback, the
Sons of Liberty spread the news. They moved swiftly from Massachusetts and informed all the
colonies in record time. After the news had spread and people saw the photo Paul Revere filled with
propaganda and bias, many colonists who used to be neutral or Loyalists began to think that the
Sons of Liberty were right and they became Patriots too. Paul Revere's contribution to the Patriot
cause created a bigger impact than he could imagine.
All in all, the Boston Massacre was an event that was used to the colonists advantage. It may have
been a riot and the colonists probably realized that too, but if you want to get people to join your
side then you need propaganda. So, in conclusion, the Boston Massacre was a horribly bloody event
that just so happened to be the first battle of the American

The Boston Massacre
The Boston Massacre is considered by many historians to be the first battle of the Revolutionary
War. The fatal incident happened on March 5 of 1770. The massacre resulted in the death of five
colonists. British troops in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were there to stop demonstrations against
the Townshend Acts and keep order, but instead they provoked outrage. The British soldiers and
citizens brawled in streets and fought in bars. "The citizens viewed the British soldiers as potential
oppressors, competitors for jobs, and a treat to social mores". A defiant anti–British fever was
lingering among the townspeople.
There are three major things that led to the Boston Massacre: First was the growing mistrust among
the British soldiers and Americans. There were a number of other incidents were the British clashed
with the patriots and their supporters. Individual soldiers were beaten on street corners and soldiers
abused unarmed civilians. In all the Americans in Boston made it clear that the British soldiers were
unwanted. The second reason is somewhat odd. The removal of two out of four regiments meant
there were to inadequate amounts of soldiers to keep the peace. There were enough on the other
hand to remind the patriots of the great British military. The last reason would be the revolt of the
Townshend Acts. The patriots and Americans did not agree and strife with the British soldiers over
it. The Act built tension between the two.
On March 5, 1770 the dreadful day came. A

What Is The Boston Massacre
It was March 5, 1770, the people of Boston were protesting out in front of the old state house.
British soldiers patrolling King street, people hollering, this was the Boston Massacre. Soldiers were
sent to Boston to maintain control over the colonist and they were not contented. A crowd has
rapidly formed and they were tossing things such as, rock–filled snowballs, bricks, and stones while
being insulted. Quoting from witnesses, ¨lobster backs¨, ¨red coats¨, cowards! And quoting Henry
Knox, ¨For God´s Sake, take care of your men. If they fire, they die¨. But quite a few things
happened before all of this. General Preston had wanted to be prepared and his only intentions were
to ¨protect" the city of Boston. He had ordered his soldiers to

Boston Massacre Research Paper
On March 5, 1770 around nine o'clock a group of colonists gathered at the old state house and began
to taunt British soldiers stationed there. One was struck by a rock being thrown by a colonist, his
rifle discharging as he fell. The other soldiers began firing, and after the smoke cleared five
colonists were dead. Captain Preston, who was the captain of the 29th Regiment of Foot, later gave
an account on the trial that states that the massacre was a blunder on the British soldier's part.
Preston's account states that the British were there to protect the king's chest that Preston thought
would be plundered by the colonists. The colonialists were mostly responsible for the Boston
Massacre; the British troops were only acting on the defensive. The British did nothing wrong in the
Boston Massacre. In Preston's account he states:
"I immediately sent a non–commissioned officer and 12 men to protect both the sentry and the
king's money, and very soon followed myself to prevent, if possible, all disorder, fearing lest the
officer and soldiers, by the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was for the security of the king's chest. They were not there to drive the crowd back, only to make
sure it did not plunder Britain's money that was stored in Boston. When people said that they heard
the word fire, they immediately thought that it was Preston giving the order to fire. It actually may
have been because of a fire in a building across the street. Then just to make sure nothing happened,
Captain Preston himself went there to make sure his troops were in line and not susceptible to
making any brash decisions such as firing their weapons into the crowd. "They immediately
surrounded the sentry posted there, and with clubs and other weapons threatened to execute their
vengeance on him. (Preston)" The "massacre", as coined by Paul Revere was actually a set plan by
the colonists. They even rang bell towers to signify people that they should start coming to the

Causes Of The Boston Massacre
With revolution on the rise and independence in colonist minds, it starts to be clear that the
definition of American is becoming more evident in British minds. With the first few acts such as
the Stamp Acts, Quartering Acts, Tea Act, and etc., the British had placed on the colonists, the sense
of patriotism becomes more common in all Americans. But the event of the Boston Massacre, which
had troops of British soldiers fire upon a crowd of colonists, boosted the idea of freedom and
furthered the hate of Britain by the colonists. This occurrence, although tragic, did help the colonists
unite together and aided the revolution. It is unclear which side, colonists or the British, stimulated it
into happening. However, I believe that the Americans are the ones to blame for this tragic event.
The whole occurrence had the British holding the guns and shooting at the colonists but I feel that
the colonists stimulated this affair. In different accounts of the massacre, it is stated that the colonists
taunted the redcoats. Additionally, this protest was the result of the mercantilistic acts British
imposed.
The Boston Massacre initially started as an argument in Boston's customs house. However, tensions
grew and finally the protests became more violent and the bullets flew into the crowd. In differing
reports of this event, many of them state that something was thrown into one of the soldiers
prompting the firing. According to Thomas Preston (Doc 2), the Captain of the troopers in

Was The Boston Massacre A Massacre
On March 5, 1770, indignant Boston colonists assembled on King Street, rocketing snowballs and
launching stones at the British soldiers stationed in the English city. The rebels heckled the troops,
threatening them with weapons and ominous declarations, inducing defensive military action by the
British, leading to the deaths of five colonial rebels...Let's try that again.
On March 5, 1770, passionate Boston colonists gathered on King Street to discuss the inequitable,
prejudiced taxes enacted by their tyrannical mother country. The British soldiers embarked on a
fervid rampage, terrorizing the colonial people with hostile words and menacing attacks. The
altercation ended with innocent colonists splattered on the icy ground, the pure snow now stained
with burgundy blood, their frosty bodies pierced with lethal bullets, their brisk breaths reduced to
clouds of death... Much better.
If you were educated in the United States of America, you know the Boston Massacre as the
slaughtering of innocent Patriots fighting for liberty, for justice, for freedom. Yet if you are British,
the Boston Massacre is an irrelevant event in your Civil War. The victors dictate history, therefore,
perspective is skewed and history is fabricated. Because of historical inaccuracy, you were probably
unaware that the Boston Massacre was not a massacre at all; it became a "massacre" through
propaganda, specifically, Paul Revere's engraving, The Bloody Massacre Perpetrated in King Street
and colonial

The Booston Massacre: The Boston Massacre
THE BOSTON MASSACURE
On the night of March 5, 1770, colonists went to the Boston Customs House. They were angered
from all the laws, for example, the Quartering Act, Stamp Act, and the Townshend Act. The
colonists took snowballs with oyster shells and threw them at the soldiers. The soldiers panicked and
fired at the colonists, 5 civilians laid died and the colonist protested the massacre and the soldiers
were arrested and branded. Personally, the soldiers are to blame for the Boston Massacre because
the colonists were treated unfairly, the fight wasn't fair and the Private Montgomery fired first. First,
colonists were taxed for the use of paper, certain goods, and required colonists to cloth and feed the
soldiers that were sent to the

Examining Whether or not the Boston Massacre was a True...
The Merriam–Webster online dictionary defines massacre as "the act or an instance of killing a
number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty"
or "a cruel or wanton murder" (m–w.com). Essentially a massacre results in either the death of many
people or death by cruel means. The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770, in Boston,
Massachusetts and involved American colonists and British troops. The colonists, upset by recent
laws enacted by the British, taunted a smaller group of British soldiers by throwing snowballs at
them (Boston Massacre Historical Society). In response, the soldiers fired upon the unarmed
colonists leaving five people dead and six wounded (Phelan, 131). Even ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The act also gave customs agents the authority to search property, including the colonists' homes.
The colonial response to these acts was increasing violence against the customs officials. In 1768,
the British government sent troops to America to reinforce the Townshend Acts and protect the
customs agents. At one point there were 4,000 British soldiers in a city of only 16,000 people
(Phelan, 24). According to Phelan, there were "almost daily confrontations" between soldiers and
civilians (38). There was increasing tension between the troops and the American colonists. Some
children as well as adults tormented the troops by throwing snowballs and chunks of ice at the
soldiers. There was also increasing tension between the colonists who were loyal to the Crown and
those who were loyal to the colonies because some store owners broke their agreements about
importing and selling British goods. Children threw trash and rocks at those storeowners' buildings.
Several days before the Boston Massacre, one of the loyalist merchants shot and killed a young man
who was a part of group vandalizing his business (Phelan, 44–46). The colonists' tempers flared. By
March 5, 1770, only 600 British troops remained in the city (Zobel, 181). "On Monday, March 5,
Boston seemed to be holding its breath" (Lukes, 32). The friction between

Boston Massacre Causes
What lead up to The Boston Massacre? Like many disputes in history this was caused by two things,
money and honor. In the 1760's the British Parliament introduced a series of new taxes on the
colonies to offset the cost of the Seven Year War that had left them with crippling debt and to cover
the expense of the British Soldiers that were stationed in the U.S. With each new series of taxes that
were passed tensions among the colonists and the British heightened. In 1765 the British Parliament
issued The Stamp Act which was to be the first internal tax imposed on the colonists. This meant
that just about anything made from paper was subjected to being taxed such as legal documents,
newspapers, almanacs, playing cards and dice each of

The Statue Of The Boston Massacre
Have you ever wondered how the Crispus Attucks and other patriots were honored? Well, there is a
monument in Boston that honor those men and women who died for our rights. The Boston
Massacre memorial statue is located in Boston Massachusetts. There is a great amount of symbolism
included on the statute such as the women crushing the crown to defy the British rule and an eagle
to symbolize the strength of America. This statue is an amazing memorial for the patriots that died
for our rights. The memorial was built by Robert A. Kraus to remember our fallen patriots. On the
night of March 5, 1770, men and women gathered in the streets for a riot. They were tired of being
pushed around by the British. They started hurling things at the British

The Boston Massacre In The Incident On King Street
The Incident on King Street is not well known in America but if one was to bring it up in Great
Britain the British could talk for days. In America, "The Incident on King Street" is well known as
the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre is a crucial event in America's early history and is a
leading factor in our freedom from Great Britain. It is a leading cause for the American Revolution
and made people look at British rule in a different light. According to Hiller B. Zobel, author of The
Boston Massacre "... we realized that our country's freedom grew from bloodshed." The Boston
Massacre occurred on March 5th, 1770, but events lead up to an accident of this severity for months,
and even years before. With rulers who ruled from thousands of miles away, it was hard to
understand the needs and wants of the colonist in America. Although the main goal from the rulers
in Great Britain was to collect money from the colonist, the colonist had different goals in mind.
According Jack P. Greene ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was a cold and snowy night which lead to the loss of five colonist lifes. As a large crowd of
colonists started to gather and yell, British soldiers were in a fury. The soldiers were lead by Captain
Thomas Preston towards a large and unruly crowd. The crowd was disrespectful and would not
follow any instructions of the soldiers. Bostonmassacre.net claims the crowd of colonist were
taunting the soldiers by shouting "Fire and be damned." Although there are counts of the Captain
saying "fire" it is not for certain that he did not say "do not fire". It can not be for certain what was
said and it what context he meant it by. History.com claims that three colonist were killed on site
immediately and two died later due to injuries resulted from the gun fire. As the redcoats fired into a
large crowd, the colonist were scared and began to run. But it didn't matter for the five who did not
survive the

The American Massacre : The Causes Of The Boston Massacre
What happened on March 5, 1770? The Boston Massacre happened. Many of the colonist had just
lost their jobs so they gathered around together. The colonist were not happy that they had lost their
jobs most of the colonists were furious. A seventeen year old boy who was an apprentice had
stepped out of his group and was screaming at the British that's when it happen. A British soldier
had hit the seventeen–year old apprentice that's when the crowd went wild and started to fight with
the British. The British soldiers had fired their guns. There were five colonists who were dead. The
first man to be shot was an African American man. Paul Revere had seen what the British had done
so he wrote a poster and called it the Bloody Massacre. After that had happened in Boston with the
British soon after the other colonists heard about it as well.The British did not know that what they
had done was the beginning of the war and they had started. (Miller & Perry,2017) (American
Revolution, 2010). September 5,1774, that is when the first continental meeting was. Each colony
was getting guns secretly and hiding them because they didn't want the British to know that they had
weapons also because they were preparing for a war with the British. Each town had started a militia
every person who joined the militia under went training. They were taught to fire a gun. Once the
British had heard each colony had there own milta they went to stop them. Once it was dark the
British soldiers headed out of Boston to go to the colonies and end there militia's. Paul Revere hears
about the British going so he gets on a horse riding to each colony telling them the British are
coming. In September 5, 1775, the battle of Lexington and Concord. The militia group had heard the
British were coming so they got their weapons and were ready to meet the British. There was sixty–
men who met with the British. Nobody knows who fired the first shot. Among the soldiers there
were African American men fighting with us. The militiamen were not as good as the British.The
British fired more than the colonists of Lexington and Concord. Eight patriots were dead ten were
wounded. We had lost the first battle of Lexington and Concord. The British wanted to

Boston Massacre Propaganda Essay
Was the Boston Massacre used as propaganda after event took place? The Massacre occurred in
1770 on the night of March 5. The event resulted in the British army shooting and killing 5 men
while under attack by a so called "mob". The shootings took place right outside of The Old State
House. Eight shooters were arrested, but soon after their trials it came down to only two of the six to
be convicted of manslaughter. This led to colonial leaders like Paul Revere and Samuel Adams
publicizing the event. The publicity was used to change the way colonists felt about the British
authorities and in particular was used to help unite the colonies and spread the cause of
Independance. As a result of the Boston Massacre, the colonists were able to use ... Show more
Soon after the Massacre, colonists brought up the event at memorials for the people who had died. It
was written in a paper which quoted ''Americans! Bear in remembrance the HORRID
MASSACRE...when five of your fellow countrymen lay...basely and most inhumanly
MURDERED!''. That quote was used in the Memorial for those who had died in the Boston
Massacre and to remind everyone that they were killed because the British soldiers felt threatened
by a bunch of unarmed innocent bystanders who were throwing a little shade.
The Boston Massacre was said to be the event that brought the colonies closer to unite against the
British Government and these conflicts between the colonists and the British army were rising
because of how the British Government was trying to gain more control over the American colonies
while also trying to raise the American taxes. The Massacre was used to encourage colonists to fight
harder for their freedom and independence but also was known as a zero hour in the American
Revolution. This point had allowed groups like the Groups like the Sons of Liberty to use it to show
the corruption of British rule.
The British being so powerful changed the way most American colonies thought about the British.
The majority of the colonies were to

The Boston Massacre
The Boston Massacre
The tension between the colonies and Britain was nothing new. There were several occasions where
the colonies became greatly infuriated with the unpleasant treatment they were receiving. Prior to
the year 1770, much of the outcry came from the acts passed by the British government, such as the
Stamp Act, Quartering Act, and Declaratory Act ("A Timeline of the American Revolution"). Even
though the colonists were infuriated, it would take something more to push them over the edge. This
something would turn out to be what is now called the Boston Massacre. Although the Boston
Massacre won't go down as the deadliest massacre in American history, it will go down as one of the
most pivotal turning points due to the colonists' depiction of the event. Several things happened
leading up to the massacre itself, which are important to note. The colonists were becoming
increasingly frustrated with Britain, which led to political unrest. To counteract this unrest, British
troops were sent to Boston, where they arrived on October 1, 1968. Originally, there wasn't an open
resistance to the presence of the troops. Over time, things would change, which can be derived from
the events of March 5, 1770. There were two sides: the mob of colonists and the the British soldiers.
The colonists ended up attacking a British sentinel, leaving the British captain to call in more
soldiers, who were also attacked. Shots were fired by the British, killing a total of 5 and wounding 6

Boston Massacre Essay
The Boston Massacre is considered by many historians to be the first battle of the Revolutionary
War. The fatal incident happened on March 5 of 1770. The massacre resulted in the death of five
colonists. British troops in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were there to stop demonstrations against
the Townshend Acts and keep order, but instead they provoked outrage. The British soldiers and
citizens brawled in streets and fought in bars. &#8220;The citizens viewed the British soldiers
as potential oppressors, competitors for jobs, and a treat to social mores'; (Mahin 1). A defiant anti–
British fever was lingering among the townspeople.
There are three major things that led to the Boston Massacre: First was the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
To please the crowds Governor Hutchinson arrested the soldiers and promised the people that there
would be a trial. John Adams and Josiah Quincy took the defense of the soldiers and Preston. The
soldiers went to trial in September and they and captain Preston pleaded innocent. The eight men
and Preston were tried separately and only two were found guilty. The others were acquitted while
the two found guilty were branded on the hand and released, an easy penalty for murder. Preston
was found innocent. Adams was successful in proving the soldiers fired in self–defense.
The soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre were proven innocent. &#8220;Adam proved
that the soldiers fired in self–defense'; (no author 10).
I believe the British soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre and/or the captain Tomas Preston
should have been convicted Guilty.
The five deaths were unjustified and unneeded. All of the five men were unarmed at the time of the
shootings. If someone throws an apple at you, you don&#8217;t shoot him or her. In a
today&#8217;s court system I believe them British soldiers would have been guilty and been
convicted with murder. &#8220;Adams said, the killing were justified and blamed the violence
of the immigrant Patrick Carr and Crispus Attucks'; (Mahin 1). So if Adams believes the death of the
five men were blamed on them two how come they weren&#8217;t just arrested and how come
the others were shot. &#8220;Adams told the jury

Essay On The Boston Massacre
Everyone always asks why there were only five people that died in the Boston massacre, it will be
discovered today. The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770 in Boston Massachusetts at the
Boston's customs house. The British troops were sent to Boston in 1768, because of taxation. While
the British soldiers were in Boston, the American colonist decided to mess with the Soldiers. As this
was happening, the patriots had been protesting against the British troops. The British troops getting
word from their captain, to get ready to guard and attack. As the crowd starts to rile this led to five
people dying.
In the photo, it mentions that "Just three weeks after British soldiers shot and killed five Bostonians
and wounded six others, the silversmith and patriot Paul Revere produced this engraving, which
depicts the British massacring peaceful colonists in cold blood." The leader of the British troops is
Thomas Preston. There's always two sides to every story. Listening to Theodore Bliss, He was on
the Patriots side. Theodore said he saw the patriots throw a couple of snow balls first. A couple of
them hit the soldiers, then before the patriots knew it, the Soldiers started to fire. Theodore says he
didn't hear the captain say to fire when shots were fired. He was uncertain, soldiers and patriots were
saying it, and Theodore could differentiate who was saying what. But Theodore doesn't know
whether it came from the captain or not. There were about a hundred of people

On March 5, 1770, what is considered to be the first battle of the American Revolution occurred;
although, it's clear that this was an extremely one sided battle. A culmination of frustration of the
American colonists resulted in the wounding of twelve civilians, half of which died in the shootout.
Despite all the injuries occurring on the American side, it must be acknowledged that the British
soldiers were heavily provoked and harassed; they were being relentlessly pelted with snowballs and
assorted objects by a mob of colonists. The city of Boston beforehand had long been known as a
rebellious city, from also harassing new customs commissioners that led to British militia being
placed in the city. While it is technically the fault of the colonist mob for the massacre occurring, the
Boston Massacre was but one of many explosive culminations of American frustration with the
British crown. From pieces of legislature that ridiculously taxed the colonies to an excess military
presence, the Boston Massacre, despite the casualties, was a victory for rallying support for the
coming war against the British army. This is why the Boston Massacre is considered to be the first
battle of the American Revolution, because of the great frustration expressed with the colonies'
mother country that led to this explosion of tension as well as how the public perceived the event,
aided by none other than Samuel Adams. There were many things that led to the Boston Massacre.
Although this event,

Dbq Boston Massacre
On March 5, 1770, five English colonists were killed in Boston, Massachusetts, by British soldiers.
This day will forever be known as the Boston Massacre. It all started with a British sentry who was
stationed in Boston. The sentry faced verbal harassment from colonists in the town. Eventually, the
group grew larger, and the British sentry called in eight additional soldiers for backup. The large
mob of colonists began to physically attack the colonists with clubs and other weapons, leading to
the British soldiers to fire on the colonists. The colonists were to blame for the events that occurred
on March 5, 1770, because they verbally tormented the British, threatened them with weapons and
largely outnumbered the British soldiers.
First, the colonists were to blame for the Boston Massacre because they verbally tormented the
British. The colonists even tricked the British into firing on them by telling the soldiers to fire. The
colonists had told the British to, " 'Fire, fire, and be damned' " (Doc 2). This shows how the
colonists instructed the soldiers to fire on them. One soldier was even noted to have heard a
command to fire, but did not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The large mob of colonists were assaulting the British with snowballs and clubs. British Captain
Preston described how, "one of the soldiers [had] received a severe blow with a stick, stepped a little
on one side and instantly fired" (Doc 4). This shows how the British were instigated to fire, as the
colonists brutally assaulted them with clubs. Captain Preston went on to say how he was also struck
by a club, as well as being pelted with snowballs. The use of these weapons forced the British
soldiers to fire, as they needed to defend themselves from any further attacks. Overall, the British
were physically harassed by the colonists, which shows how the colonists were at fault for the
events on March 5,

Boston Massacre : The York Massacre
When researching many sources written about the Boston massacre, there were several authors who
issued articles about the Boston Massacre, particularly journals, letter and references. Some authors
categorized the Boston massacre by its context in history by examining it by the people who were
involved in the important event. However, while the authors talk about journals, letters and
references, there really wasn't much discussion about other important part of the Boston Massacre:
who really caused it. The goal in this research paper is this Boston Massacre debate is by explaining
how it was the colonist fault for causing the Boston massacre because they resulted in the soldiers
firing at them because they were the ones to start the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Third section including how the colonist caused innocent people to die and how they people in jail
for defending themselves from the colonist. Fourth section will talk about how the colonist started
the war. Last section will conclude with conclusion with the Boston Massacre, giving a brief
summary of the topics main points, restating thesis and a call to action. This paper will also include
on the last page a works cited.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT The eighteenth century had faced many problems with colonist around
the world from New York to Boston, the soldiers coming to Boston and how people reflected their
anger off the soldiers. Though Great Britain had many different colonies from all around the world,
it was expensive to control all the colonies, though in the middle of the Seven Years' War which
occurred during 1756–1763. The French and Indian war, had been fought against the French over
competing against colonist interest. Great Britain thought that the colonist in North America should
to pay for the War, so in June 1767 parliament had passed the Townshend acts to raise the funds
needed. The legislation who levied taxes on tea, paper, paint and glass, laid bed very unpopular in
American colonies who considered themselves as Britons, the colonist disagreed the notion of the
taxation without representation. Some colonist thought they should start to boycott the good in

The Symbolism Of The Boston Massacre
On the night of March 5th 1770, chaos broke out into the streets Boston. Colonists went to King
Street, weapons in hand and ready to fight. Soldiers stood by the Customs House, Bayonets at ready.
Colonists went against British soldiers on King Street, creating more unrest between Britain and the
Colonies. The Stamp Act, the Sugar Act, and many more laws and taxes from Britain made colonists
upset. Many people, like the Sons of Liberty, wanted to break away from Britain and be
independent. All of the tension between Britain and the Colonies led to the Boston Massacre. A
popular myth about the Boston Massacre was it was one sided, soldiers overpowered helpless
colonists. In reality, colonists played a large role against soldiers during the Boston Massacre.
Colonists not fighting back was perpetuated by Paul Revere's engraving, "The Bloody Massacre in
King Street". The engraving can be considered propaganda of the Sons of Liberty, used to push their
ideologies. Colonists in the Boston Massacre fought against soldiers, they weren't as helpless as
people were led to believe. Theodore Bliss, a man who was there that night, reported, "I saw people
throw snowballs... [and] a stick about 2 feet long strike a soldier upon the right." (Doc 3). This quote
proves the claim because it shows people were throwing things and even hitting soldiers with sticks
to hurt them, not being pushed back and being helpless. Another man, Benjamin Burdick was also at
the Boston Massacre, arriving at 9pm,

In March of 1770, the tensions were high between the American colonist and the British soldiers
stationed in Boston Massachusetts. The massacre happened on March 5, between the British troops
and a crowd in Boston. In the evening of that day, tension would reach a bloody and dangours point
resulting in what has been named The Boston Massacre which had also been called the "Incident on
King Street" by the British. This incident would turn out to be one of the major events leading to the
American Revolution. The story about how the Boston Massacre happened always is different for
each person, and varies on how it is told. (Boston Massacre Facts) (Wallenfeldt) (White)
In order to protect colonial officials who had the job of enforcing very ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Eventually seeing the torment against White, an officer and six privates came to Private White 's aid.
There was a rule about how the soldiers were only allowed to fire if and only if the crowd had not
dispersed within an hour. They loaded their weapons and positioned themselves in a defensive form.
The mob grew to over 300 angry colonists. In the mob of angry colonist there was confusion, some
soldiers though that they had heard the command to fire and followed through. When a British
soldier, was struck and hit by an object thrown by one of the colonists, he fired his weapon into the
crowd. Several other British troops followed his actions, before the massacre came to an end and the
crowd dispersed. Captain Thomas Preston was the British officer in charge on the day. He insisted
that he never gave the order for his troops to fire their guns. Yet at some point, they fired their guns,
and the deaths and injuries mounted. It was Preston who ended the shooting. (Boston Massacre
Facts) (Wallenfeldt) (White)
Not long after, Preston and the seven soldiers that he led were under arrest. The sentry who they had
went to rescue was under arrest as well. A town meeting the next morning had produced a demand
for the removal of all the troops, and by March 11 both the 14th. Fearing for their safety, customs
commissioners had left town. Various conflictions had delayed the soldier's trials for months. In the
provisional, both sides of the clash attempted to

Essay On The Boston Massacre
With colonists throwing snowballs with shards of ice to colonists laying on the ground and losing
blood. 5 colonist deaths and 6 nonfatal injuries that profoundly affected their day–to–day lives. The
Boston Massacre was a fatal altercation between a mob of violent protesting colonists and a group
of British soldiers protecting themselves. It occurred on the night of March 5th, 1770, a small
argument broke out between a few colonists and British Private Hugh White in front of the Custom
House in Boston. After a while, more colonists started to gather around creating an agitated mob.
Many think that the British were at fault for firing when not given permission, and others think the
colonists were at fault for harassing and mocking the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We will not have you here. We'll get rid of you, we'll drive you away!" Most consider the acts of the
British Soldiers as self–defense against the colonists, and personally, that is true. The Second reason
is that is that the colonists pushed their rights against the British Soldiers. The colonists would hurt
and taunt the British Soldiers while knowing that they couldn't taunt them back. The British were
quick–tempered but managed to stay loyal and not fire until it got too out of hand and the colonists
started a riot, then that when the British Soldiers responded with force. The colonists essentially
started the fight by using force first.
The third reason is that the colonists were very violent and brought weapons. They would pick
things up from the ground such as sticks, stones, shovels, and clubs. Although the British Soldiers
had powerful muskets, the muskets take a long time to reload and by the time they reload almost 50
or more stones or sticks could have been thrown. The colonists had a big advantage over the British
Soldiers. The British Soldiers used self–defense not an act of violence.
Part African and part Native American, it was Crispus Attucks. Crispus Attucks was the first to get
shot and die in the Boston Massacre. He was a dock worker and his death was considered the first
death in the Revolutionary War.
There are many reasons why people would

Significance Of The Boston Massacre
The Boston Massacre took place on the night of March 5, 1770. The Boston Massacre was a major
event in American History that led to the Revolutionary War.
The Boston Massacre began on the evening of March 5, 1770. With a small argument between
British Private High White and a few colonists outside the custom house in Boston on King Street.
The argument began to escalate as more colonists gathered and began to harass and throw sticks and
snowballs at Private White. British soldiers in Boston opened fire on a group of American colonists
killing five men. Prior to the Boston Massacre, the British had instituted a number of new taxes on
Americans including taxes on tea, glass, paper, paint and lead. (American Revolution)
With the killing of the five colonists, British regulars thought that the Culmination of tensions in the
American colonies that had been growing since Royal troops first appeared in Massachusetts in
October 1786 to enforce the heavy tax burden imposed by the Townshed Act.
Since 1765, the people of Boston had been heading protests against British taxation, first against the
Stamp Act and then in 1767, against the Townshed Act. On October 1768, troops arrived in Boston
requested by Governor Francis Bernard. Conflicts between the British and the colonists had been on
the rise because the British government had been trying to increase control over the colonies and
raise taxes at the same time. This event in Boston helped unite the colonies all over Britain. With the

Sympathy And The Boston Massacre
Points of views are majorly impacted by different words, actions and even locations. This is
important in order to understand all the sides of a story. Meaning, that on March 5th, 1770, when
colonists and soldiers gathered on King's street, America and Britain went to the media to present
their perspectives of the tragic event. The statements, that were similar, are as follows: the colonists
used snowballs as weapons, there was profanity from both soldiers and colonists, and lastly, around
11 soldiers were involved and two more were assaulted. Deciding what the truth was, was difficult.
Therefore, the Boston Massacre had two sides, the colonial stance and the British. The other issue
was figuring out which side you stood on. The fact was, most ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They released an article in the London Chronicle stating how multiple troops were "attacked and
insulted by the mob". The newspaper emphasized firing was the only justification towards
everything that had been going on. They said firing was a form of self–defense against the mob.
Meaning that when the soldiers left willingly–– once the Boston Council decided it was better for
them to leave the inhabitants of the town–– it was implied that the British were sensible and all they
were trying to do was protect themselves. Along with these statements, the British constantly
attempted to prove themselves as innocent. To do this, they went to the arts. Alonzo Chappel painted
the British perspective of the Boston Massacre in the 1800's. The art depicted the colonists attacking
the British soldiers with clubs, looking far more menacing than the soldiers. Along with the focal
points of this painting, one can also see colonists looking out their windows viewing the event,
rather than calling for help. Making it seem as though the colonists didn't feel the need to put a stop
to this dispute. Overall, The London Chronicle influenced many of the British, appealing to people's
anxiousness and anxiety of a colonial

"...he really thought they did fire to defend themselves." The Bloody Massacre was a killing of five
people and six others were wounded. A more commonly known name is the Boston Massacre. This
was also a key event that led to the start of the Revolutionary War. The Boston Massacre occurred
on March 5th, 1770. It was a street fight between American colonists and British soldiers. American
colonists were outraged about the Townshend Acts of 1767, which was an act that allowed the
British to tax the Americans on paper, led, and tea. The British wanted to keep a tight control over
the Americans, so they passed the Quartering Act, which stated that American colonists had to house
British soldiers. Around two hundred colonists surrounded the British soldiers before the fight
occurred. After taunting from the colonists, a British soldier fired into the crowd. An African
American sailor, named Crispus Attackus, was killed first. Samuel Gray, James Cauldwell, Samuel
Maverick, and Patrick Carr were shot and died later. The Revolution of armed rebellion rose
throughout colonies, afterwards. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also a trial of Captain Preston and his men to be charged for murder. A prosecution was held later
on that year in December. Captain James Preston and eight other soldiers were charged for murder.
Josiah Quincy, the second, and John Adams defended the British at their trial. John Adams stood up
for the soldiers stating that them shooting, was simply self–defense. This led to them not being
found guilty, and they were released later on. However, two of the men were found guilty of
manslaughter. They got the letter, M branded on their thumbs and they were released. Paul Revere
used the massacre as a political propaganda to stir patriots in other colonies to fight and

Boston Massacre Analysis
The British Side of the Boston Massacre
Mykenzie Cotiaux
"Between the hours of nine and ten o'clock, being in my master's house, was alarmed by the cry of
fire, I ran down as far as the town–house, and then heard that the soldiers and the inhabitants were
fighting in the alley... I then left them and went to King street. I then saw a party of soldiers loading
their muskets about the Custom house door, after which they all shouldered. I heard some of the
inhabitants cry out, "heave no snow balls", others cried "they dare not fire". The Boston massacre
has been no massacre it was propaganda. The incident that happened March 5th, 1770 in the streets
of Boston only killed five people and had six people with non fatal injuries. There were ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Boston massacre was played out to be such a big thing, although it was a misunderstanding. It
was the colonists who were asking for there to be trouble. If the colonists were not throwing things
and beating the British then the gun would have never gone off. The colonists were protesting
against someone who was not doing anything wrong. Why were the colonists protesting something
that we still have today? Before the colonists were threatening the British the British was just doing
their jobs. The colonists were the ones threatening the British so why were the British put in jail for
it? In conclusion, 8 British soldiers were arrested for using self defense. If the colonists were not
protesting no shots would have been fired so the Boston massacre would have never happened, in
the end the Boston massacre was just propaganda towards the

Essay On Boston Massacre
The Boston Massacre
From the beginning of history, the events that have happened have been created by something, these
events have caused emotions to lift and tensions to come to a snapping point. The Boston Massacre
was defiantly not an exception; America was feeling all the pressure of what the British was doing
to them and was completely ready to break away from the rule. However, the separation between the
two parties would not come without a fight on both sides. The British did not feel the American's
had the right to separate from them under the British rule. Although, the Americans were fed up of
the taxes and rules being placed upon them and wanted to break free from their political tyrants. The
Boston Massacre is what would be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Boston Massacre as history shows us was the explosion in history that led American's and the
British into the American Revolution. However, the events that lead to the happening of the Boston
Massacre, put the British soldiers at a disadvantage that day. However, the British Army had
occupied the city, but they were just following the orders given to them by the British Parliament.
They did not grasp the pressure that the colonist was being put under and if they did, they did not
fully understand the consequences or it never crossed their minds.
Boston had withstood the life with British soldiers before the Boston Massacre in 1770 for two
years. The British Army landed on the shores of Boston in October of 1768. The citizens of the city
had endured the everyday life of the soldiers as they rose in the morning, trained throughout the day
and went back to their tents in the evening. Not only did they see them every day they
communicated with them in town when the soldiers came into the town to buy goods and utilized
services within the city limits of Boston. A very famous citizen of Boston, Paul Revere, described
what he saw as the solider came into the city. Revere said, "They (the British) formed and marched
with insolent parade, drums beating, fifes playing and colors flying, up King Street. Each soldier has
received 16 rounds of powder and ball." Troops of the 29th, unable

Boston Massacre : The York Massacre
Boston Massacre
In the year 1770, tensions between Great Britain and the colonists reached an all–time high. As a
result of more aggressive policies imposed by that of the British parliament, violent opposition grew
immensely and in one case, a historical and very bloody conflict now commonly known as the
Boston Massacre, took place. This event came about as a result of the invasion of a Boston ship
named Liberty, causing Bostonians to riot and push the customs officials out of towns. Statistically,
by the end of 1769, nearly 4,000 troops resided within an area with a population of nearly 15,000.
Although the rebellion and revolts seemed to grow rather quickly, a series of events simply built up
in such a way which makes the Massacre considerably 'a wimpy way to rebel.' First, nearly 5 years
before this gruesome killing, Great Britain enforced the Townshend Act upon the colonists, forcing
the payment and collection of taxes. Consequently, no person wanted to pay this imposed charge to
a country which simply causes conflict. Instead, people began to revolt, rebel, and riot against these
demands. In return, Great Britain passed the Quartering Act to suffice for the shelter of troops whom
of which were placed in towns to act as a means of structure regarding control over the people.
Beginning in 1765, the colonists were expected to provide shelter and food for soldiers at their own
expense. In addition to the shipment of troops in order to control the people, many British

Lincoln's Massacre : The Shootings Of The Boston Massacre
The Boston Massacre trial was the most important event on March 5, 1770. The Massacre consisted
of five deaths, and the trial was suppose to be the deciding factor for those deaths. To this day there
are people that think that the redcoats were the people that instigated the shots that were fired, but
the others think that it was the mob that started it.
Before the Boston Massacre the moment that the redcoats set foot in Boston, they were constantly at
odds with the citizens of the town. The tension between the two seemed to have reached a boiling
point. Private Hugh White was under assault by a crowd of boys throwing things like snowballs,
oysters, and stones and clubs. As claimed by witnesses, a club flew through the air striking one of
the soldiers in the head, causing him to lose his balance and discharge his musket. The rest of the
soldiers thought that the order to fire had been given so they discharged their weapons into the
crowd. There were five citizens that were on the ground, mortally wounded.
John Adams received a knock on his door the next day. Because nobody else would take the case he
was asked to defend the soldiers and Captain Preston. Adams agreed to take the case without
hesitation. John Adams believed in upholding the law, and defending the innocent, above all. Adams
believed that the soldiers were wrongly accused and that they fired their weapons in self–defense. In
Adam's diary, he wrote Samuel Adams, "'This however is no Reason why the Town should not

Song Analysis: The Boston Massacre
American Revolution Final
Boston Massacre
By: Jared Kasper
The Boston Massacre took place from March 5, 1770 to September 3, 1783. The Boston Massacre
started by a stolen hair cut. An officer was getting a haircut by a young barber, and when the officer
was done, he walked out. He did not pay, and that one action started a war. Ice, rocks, and bricks
were thrown. Their was a "war" started by a haircut, and that started a whole revolution.
Sorry– Justin Bieber
This song relates to my topic because of the line "is it too late now to say sorry". Yes I absolutely
hate this song, but it demonstrates how the officer should have said sorry and paid for the hair cut.
The colonists of the community were throwing ice and rocks, while the patriots shot and stabbed
everyone. In the court case, the "leaders and people" of the colonists were charged with the crimes.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most American indians allied with the French. The indians sided with the French because they
traded and did not settle on the land. The French and British both wanted more land. The FRench
and Indians War took more lives than the American Revolution. It was the bloodiest American war
in the 18th Century. This war actually lasted 9 years, not

Boston Massacre Dbq
On March 5, 1770...The Boston Massacre, known as the Incident on King Street by the British, was
an incident on March 5, 1770, in which British Army soldiers shot and killed people while under
attack by a lot of colonists. There was not a massacre on March 5, 1770 in Boston because.
According to the sources B,C and D say that the colonists had weapons and they were also attacking
in the massacre. The evidence that supports my claims is that in documents B,C,D the colonists are
clearly seen with weapons according to the documents with the gazette, it said that the colonists had
weapons and were involved in the fight. This supports my own opinion because in document b the
colonists are seen with some type of sword or golf club. My second reason

The Rhetorical Analysis Of The Boston Massacre Trial
John Adams, a well–educated delegate from Massachusetts, faced many roadblocks leading up to
the Revolution, most importantly, the Boston Massacre Trial. Adams risked his life by defending the
British during the lengthy trial, as most of the colonist's opinions plummeted when they learned he
was defending those who killed their own. At the end of March, reaching a couple weeks since the
bloody Boston Massacre, a grand jury brought Captain Preston and his men to plead them guilty for
murdering the colonists. After searching for a lawyer, John Adams stepped up and lead them to the
conclusion of innocence, all due to Adams' closing statement. Adams argues that the colonists will
not consider them innocent because they are British. He tells the colonists to disregard the uniforms,
look past their nationality, and see that they are men too, men who fear death and trial. In order to
strengthen his argument and sway the jury, Adams included uses of rhetorical appeals, SOAPS, and
various literary elements into his speech to produce the conclusion of innocence towards the British.
After a long trial, filled with many arguments, oppositions, and biases, Adams was ready to
conclude and bring an end to the decision. Though, even after all the time past, Adams begins with,
"I am for the prisoners at the bar," establishing ethos. He informs the people that he is the trusted,
educated lawyer that is representing the British soldiers. By using Axiom, he is basically
Daghoghi 2
saying,

The Engraving Of The Boston Massacre
The engraving of the Boston Massacre mislead people's thoughts about what happened on the said
day. The engraving was considered to be propaganda because it was especially of a biased, and was
used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. The day of the Boston
Massacre rose several questions about what happened and who was at fault. Paul Revere
intentionally changed details about the Boston Massacre in order to influence the decisions of the
Bostonians.
The setting of the Boston Massacre was changed to mislead colonists. The engraving shows a clear
sky, Butcher's Hall and a lack of snow. The engraving shows a clear sky, not with a cloud in sight. In
the far left side of the engraving was a crescent moon. In several documents were witness' who said
the events took place at least after 8 pm. Richard Palmes told investigators, " Between the hours ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If the Boston Massacre was to have taken place in the morning, one could deduce this it was no
accident. This piece of evidence was crucial because if the shooting happened at night rather than in
the morning it would rule out this being accidental. In reality, this event took place around 8 pm
where no one could see specifically what happened. The engraving of the Boston Massacre shows
no signs of precipitation or earlier precipitation. The engraving looks sunny because there are
shadows of the soldiers and colonists. In document 6, General Thomas Gage, Commander of all
British soldiers in Boston states, " The party of soldiers were attacked with bricks, stones, pieces of
ice, and snowballs." This and several other documents wrote, the colonists threw snowballs and
pieces of ice. This was the complete opposite than what the engraving shows. This shows, Paul
Revere poorly showed the climate surrounding the Boston Massacre. Behind the captain in the
engraving was a building called Butcher's Hall and the Customs House. Butcher's Hall was behind
the

Plan of investigation
This investigation will assess the significance of the causes of the Boston Massacre in 1770. It will
also connect the relationship and perspective of British Troops verses the colonists and will study
the effects of the various events that led up to the Massacre. In June 1767, British Parliament
permitted the Townshend Acts which taxed import items such as tea, lead, glass, paint, and paper.
They also constructed a Board of Custom Commissioners for America to be positioned in Boston.
After this, Boston's citizens rioted against the import taxes by creating anti–import movements in
the colonies. The British Army soldiers killed five male civilians and wounded six others. The event
was heavily propagandized by commanding patriots such as Paul Revere and Samuel Adams who
ignited hostility towards the British powers. These events include riots against British taxations such
as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ever since 1768 in the Province of Massachusetts Bay, British troops were enlisted to uphold
specific colonial officials who tried to inflict hated Parliamentary decrees.
Crispus Attucks, a runaway slave was the leader of the attack. The crowd tossed various items
towards the sentry and challenged the soldiers to fire their weapons. Private White Hugh, a soldier,
warned Captain Thomas Preston of the riot, who was the officer of the watch. Preston proclaimed
that he posted six privates of the 29th Regiment and an officer to aid White. These Soldiers
included: Corporal William Wemms, Hugh Montgomery, John Carroll, William McCauley, William
Warren, and Matthew Kilroy. When the soldiers went to the customhouse, they spread themselves in
formation. The crowd consistently taunted them and threw snowballs. When something hit Private
Montgomery he told the troops to fire. Although the crowd left the customhouse, they continued to
rise in the streets. [Independence Hall

Essay The Boston Massacre and the American Revolution
The Boston Massacre was an important event in U.S. history, that lead to the American
Revolution. This event brought attention to the unfair ways the British soldiers were treating the
colonists. The British were treating the colonists unfairly by taxing them and using their homes for
shelter and food. They used them for food by making them make meals for them to eat and if the
colonist was a farmer with horses they would also take the horses. I will talk about the famous
lawyer John Adams and other events that happened in the Boston Massacre. On the evening of
March 5, 1770, a group of kids came up to a British soldier. The soldier was alone so the kids
thought that he would be an easy target to pick on. The kids approached the soldier ... Show more
There were two separate trials, one for Captain Preston and one for the soldiers. The first one started
about one month after the massacre, the second one started on November 27, 1770. If you don't
know who Captain Preston is, he is the captain of the group of soldiers. Some people say that he was
the one that told the soldiers to fire. It even shows him raising his hand to fire in Paul Revere's
engraving. It is not certain that, this is what happened because there is no other proof but the
engraving. From what I have heard Captain Preston was telling the soldiers not to fire. Before the
Boston Massacre's name became common it was called The Bloody Massacre on King Street. This
name is on the famous Paul Revere engraving. In the early 1800s it was also called the State Street
Massacre. If you don't know what a massacre is, it is a massive killing. Even though the Boston
Massacre wasn't a massive killing it was still called a massacre, because it was a big deal. Paul
Revere is the man who made the famous engraving. It is not certain that he was at the massacre, but
some think that he was. I think that he was there, because if he wasn't there then how did he make
the engraving. I can see where people can think that he wasn't there though. He could have just
drawn the people and put the background of the scene on the engraving. The Boston Massacre is one
of my favorite events in history. I like the mystery in

Boston Massacre Happened
What Really Happened at the Boston Massacre It was a cool night in Boston in early march. I was
passing by the customs house while a group of boys began to yell and hollering at some British
soldiers. As the boys continued the soldiers began to fluster, so much to the point that he strikes one
of the boys with his rifle. And as soon as I can blink, I was in the middle of a crowd surrounding the
soldier. As the crowd grew, more soldiers came to his side. The crowd started to get out of control so
one of the soldiers picked up his musket and fired into the crowd and so his allies followed suit with
one of the musket shots nearly missing me. All of the citizens run in all directions and the crowd
nearly trampling children. I returned home and later discovered that the soldiers were placed under
house arrest and soon after taken to jail and charged for the death of several people. As things heated
up in court, more and more British soldiers arrived in Boston. They did this to bring peace to Boston
but it did not do that it all. It did the exact opposite and caused even more chaos. And as chaos
spread ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I picked who I thought was the most consistent or who's stories were the most similar to each
other's. I focused on the locations they mentioned, specifically around the town house and King
street because they seem to have the most eyewitness backing. They I focused on a few different
little details. Like the number of soldiers that witnesses say shot somebody. Then I focused on what
was said. Witnesses say that they heard a soldier with their back to them say "Fire". For the people I
didn't believe. I just felt that some of their key points were just too far off the facts that were
trending between some of the other people. I know that there is several people that I do not have on
wither list and that's because I felt that I didn't have enough information to definitely say who goes
on

The Boston Massacre : A Massacre
After analyzing the video about the Boston Massacre, what it should be called depends all on which
side you took. Patriots would have took this as a massacre because, not only would it blame the
British, but their people were also considered "slaughtered". Thus, to the Patriots, this would be
considered a massacre. However, for the Loyalists and British, this would be considered a riot. A
crowd of colonists threw snowballs, stones, oyster shells, and even wood at British soldiers. This
was basically a disturbance of peace, or a riot. The soldiers had the right of defending themselves, so
I do understand the reasons for shooting, but killing wasn't necessary. In the end however, in my
opinion, without being biased to any sides, the Boston Massacre should be considered a riot.
The first reason I believe the Boston Massacre is because of Paul Revere's painting. After studying
his painting, I would say it is very inaccurate. Not only was Crispus Attucks not shown as an African
American, but Paul Revere shows innocence to the crowd of colonists. It was said that colonists had
started by throwing snowballs, but snow is also not located anywhere on the painting. The saying
that the Boston Massacre must've started after nine o'clock in the evening may be a false statement
too because there is a patch of blue sky showing. I believe the Boston Massacre may actually have
started in the morning as the moon can still be up, even during light. Paul Revere's painting was
basically an

Boston Massacre

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Angela Weber

More from Angela Weber (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Boston Massacre