Downloaded 35 times
Uploaded byDr. Elliot Fishman
Bike Share Webinar Presentation July 2015 Dr Elliot Fishman
The webinar by Dr. Elliot Fishman covers the evolution and impacts of bike share programs, including usage variations between cities and mode substitution effects on car use. Key topics include the motivations behind bike share usage, barriers faced, safety considerations, and elements of success. Future possibilities for bike sharing, such as integration with smart technology and electric assist, are also explored.
More Related Content
Similar to Bike Share Webinar Presentation July 2015 Dr Elliot Fishman
Bike Share Webinar Presentation July 2015 Dr Elliot Fishman
- 1. Global Bike Share Webinar– July 2015 Dr Elliot Fishman Institute for Sensible Transport
- 2. Outline • History ofbike share • How usage varies between cities • Mode substitution – and why it’s important • Impacts • What motivates people to use bike share • Bike share gone wrong • Elements of success
- 3. The father ofshared transport Luud Schimmelpennink, 1967
- 5.
- 6. Evolution of bikeshare 1st Generation 2nd Generation 3rd Generation
- 7. Growth of bikeshare Source: Russell Meddin, published in Fishman, 2015, Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature
- 8. 2014 Launches Source: RussellMeddin, 2015
- 9. Bike share –system size Source: O’Brien, 2014 published in Fishman, 2015, Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature
- 10.
- 11. Bikeshare use Source: Fishman,2015, Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature, Transport Reviews
- 12.
- 13. Mode substitution Source: Fishman,2015, Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature
- 14. Impacts • Car use •Physical activity • Safety Usage data Mode substitution Changes in VKT Methodology
- 15. Impact methodology Melbourne BrisbaneWashington, D.C. London Bikes 600 1800 1800 8000 Trips 138,548 209,232 2,008,079 9,040,580 Trips per bike, per day 0.6 0.3 3.0 3.1 Mean trip duration (min.) 22.0 16.2 15.8 17.5 Est. travel speed (km/h) 12 12 12 12 Est. distance travelled per trip (KM) 4.4 3.2 3.1 3.5 Est. distance travelled per system in KM (2012) 609,611 677,912 6,345,530 31,642,029 Car substitution 19% 21% 7% 2% Estimated car travel reduction (KM) 115,826 142,361 444,187 632,841 Est. car travel reduction per bike (KM) 193 79 247 79 Source: Fishman, Washington & Haworth, 2015 Bike share’s impact on car use (Transportation Research Part D)
- 16. Impact on caruse Source: Fishman, Washington & Haworth, 2015 Bike share’s impact on car use (Transportation Research Part D)
- 17. -50 0 50100 Melbourne Brisbane Washington DC Minneapolis/St. Paul London Minutes of Physical Activity (Millions) Walking not done due to bikeshare Car to bikeshare Taxi to bikeshare Public transport to bikeshare New trip Walk to bikeshare Bike share’s impact on active travel Source: Fishman et al., 2015, Bikeshare’s impact on active travel
- 18. Bike share andsafety Source: Graves et al., 2014
- 19. Bike share crashdata Slight injury Serious injury Fatal Paris 159 19 0 London 62 17 1 New York City 71 8.5 0 Montreal 22 0 0 Washington, D.C. 23 2 0 Chicago 5 2 0 Minneapolis/St Paul 0 0 0 Melbourne 0 0 0 All city total 350 65 1 Source: Fishman & Schepers (2014) Global bikeshare: What the data tells us about safety
- 20. Injuries per distancetravelled Slight injuries per million km Serious injuries per million km Paris 1.3 0.2 London 2.6 0.7 NYC 4.0 0.5 Montreal 2.2 0 Washington, D.C. 3.3 0.3 Chicago 1.8 0.7 Minneapolis/St. Paul 0 0 Melbourne 0 0 All city average 1.9 0.3 Source: Fishman & Schepers (2014) Global bikeshare: What the data tells us about safety
- 21. Safety: Private Vs.Pubic Bikes Source: Fishman & Schepers (2014) Global bikeshare: What the data tells us about safety
- 22. Bike Share: TheHuman Response
- 23. Why do peopleuse bikeshare in Australia? Source: Fishman et al., 2014 Barriers to bikesharing, Journal of Transport Geography
- 24.
- 25. Why people don’tuse bike share# Source: Fishman et al., 2014 Barriers to bikesharing, Journal of Transport Geography #Based on a Brisbane sample.
- 26. Why people didn’tuse Melbourne Bike Share Source:AltaBikeShare,2011
- 27. Bike share gonewrong: The Australian experience Too small No plan for helmets @ launch Safety concerns Poor marketing Car is too convenient
- 28. Model for success Fishman,2014 Bikeshare : barriers, facilitators and impacts on car use
- 29. Future possibilities PT smartcardintegrated Electric assist Large scale Dockless Mobile payments
- 30. Thank you. Dr ElliotFishman Director, Transport Innovation Institute for Sensible Transport E: info@sensibletransport.org.au W: www.sensibletransport.org.au