This document discusses aligning literacy work with Common Core standards, depths of knowledge (DOK), and PARCC assessments. It provides an overview of DOK, which ensures assessment items match the intent and demonstration required by standards. DOK is determined by the context and depth of thinking, not just verbs. Examples show how the same verb can be different DOK levels. It also outlines the four DOK levels from recall to extended thinking. The document then examines understanding the Common Core standards and exploring the PARCC assessment framework.
This document discusses literacy work aligned to Common Core standards, depths of knowledge (DOK), and PARCC assessments. It explains that DOK looks at the complexity of thinking required, not just verbs used, and provides examples of different DOK levels using the same verb. DOK levels include recall and reproduction (level 1), skills and concepts (level 2), strategic thinking (level 3), and extended thinking (level 4). The document also discusses understanding Common Core standards through analyzing what they say, inferring their intent, and considering how they align with and differ from current instructional practices.
The document discusses Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) framework which categorizes learning objectives into four levels of cognitive complexity: recall and reproduction (Level 1), skills and concepts (Level 2), strategic thinking (Level 3), and extended thinking (Level 4). It provides examples of questions and tasks for each level. The document also notes that a significant portion of the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) assesses higher order thinking at Levels 2-4 to promote strategic and complex cognitive skills needed for success beyond standardized tests.
The document discusses Depth of Knowledge (DOK), a model that classifies standards and assessment items based on cognitive complexity and depth of understanding required. It has 4 levels that range from basic recall to extended strategic thinking. Levels focus on aligning what students must do to demonstrate mastery of a standard with what is assessed. The DOK model ensures standards, teaching, and assessments all require sufficient depth of knowledge. Verbs alone don't determine DOK level - the context and cognitive demand of the entire item or standard must be considered.
George kills Lennie at the end of Of Mice and Men to spare him from a worse fate at the hands of other men. Students in an English class will examine this novel over the course of four weeks to understand how literature can provide insight into human relationships and responsibility. They will analyze themes of empathy, duty to others, and learning from struggles. Assessment will include creative character perspectives on George's guilt regarding two deaths in the novel.
This document discusses differentiating instruction for 6th grade students based on a preassessment of their skills in analyzing themes, functions of literary elements, and comparing historical and cultural settings in literary works. It describes using a graffiti wall and vocabulary preassessment to determine students' current understanding of content topics. Scores on the preassessment will be used to determine appropriate grouping and instructional strategies for students at different ability levels, such as independent study, direct instruction, technology-assisted reading, or homogeneous/heterogeneous grouping.
Aptitude As In Individual Difference In Sla 2Dr. Cupid Lucid
The document discusses language aptitude, which refers to an individual's propensity for learning a second language. It describes key researchers in the field like John Carroll, who defined language aptitude and proposed it has four constituent abilities. Tests developed to measure aptitude include the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) and Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB), which assess abilities like sound discrimination and associating sounds with symbols. While intelligence relates to aptitude, researchers argue they are distinct factors in second language acquisition.
This document discusses literacy work aligned to Common Core standards, depths of knowledge (DOK), and PARCC assessments. It explains that DOK looks at the complexity of thinking required, not just verbs used, and provides examples of different DOK levels using the same verb. DOK levels include recall and reproduction (level 1), skills and concepts (level 2), strategic thinking (level 3), and extended thinking (level 4). The document also discusses understanding Common Core standards through analyzing what they say, inferring their intent, and considering how they align with and differ from current instructional practices.
The document discusses Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) framework which categorizes learning objectives into four levels of cognitive complexity: recall and reproduction (Level 1), skills and concepts (Level 2), strategic thinking (Level 3), and extended thinking (Level 4). It provides examples of questions and tasks for each level. The document also notes that a significant portion of the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) assesses higher order thinking at Levels 2-4 to promote strategic and complex cognitive skills needed for success beyond standardized tests.
The document discusses Depth of Knowledge (DOK), a model that classifies standards and assessment items based on cognitive complexity and depth of understanding required. It has 4 levels that range from basic recall to extended strategic thinking. Levels focus on aligning what students must do to demonstrate mastery of a standard with what is assessed. The DOK model ensures standards, teaching, and assessments all require sufficient depth of knowledge. Verbs alone don't determine DOK level - the context and cognitive demand of the entire item or standard must be considered.
George kills Lennie at the end of Of Mice and Men to spare him from a worse fate at the hands of other men. Students in an English class will examine this novel over the course of four weeks to understand how literature can provide insight into human relationships and responsibility. They will analyze themes of empathy, duty to others, and learning from struggles. Assessment will include creative character perspectives on George's guilt regarding two deaths in the novel.
This document discusses differentiating instruction for 6th grade students based on a preassessment of their skills in analyzing themes, functions of literary elements, and comparing historical and cultural settings in literary works. It describes using a graffiti wall and vocabulary preassessment to determine students' current understanding of content topics. Scores on the preassessment will be used to determine appropriate grouping and instructional strategies for students at different ability levels, such as independent study, direct instruction, technology-assisted reading, or homogeneous/heterogeneous grouping.
Aptitude As In Individual Difference In Sla 2Dr. Cupid Lucid
The document discusses language aptitude, which refers to an individual's propensity for learning a second language. It describes key researchers in the field like John Carroll, who defined language aptitude and proposed it has four constituent abilities. Tests developed to measure aptitude include the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) and Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB), which assess abilities like sound discrimination and associating sounds with symbols. While intelligence relates to aptitude, researchers argue they are distinct factors in second language acquisition.
The document discusses individual differences in language aptitude. It defines aptitude as a learner's capacity for learning a task based on their enduring characteristics. Language aptitude refers to cognitive differences between learners and their ability to learn a language. Between 1920-1930, researchers developed early language aptitude tests to predict learners' performance. These tests used analytical and synthetic approaches. Modern tests like the MLAT and PLAB further researched aptitude and its components like memory, auditory ability, and linguistic ability. The document discusses ongoing issues around what aptitude measures, its relationship to age, intelligence, teaching methods, and the purpose of aptitude testing.
This document discusses research on individual differences in second language learning, noting that learners vary greatly in their success. It describes how this research has predominantly used quantitative methods like questionnaires and correlational analysis to study factors like abilities, propensities, beliefs and strategies. Issues are raised with solely relying on self-reported questionnaires and different studies using varying instruments to measure the same constructs.
The teacher, Erlyn Fukushima, is creating a 5 week unit on the novel "The Lightning Thief" that incorporates Greek mythology. Students will read the novel and myths, learn about different gods, and create a PowerPoint presentation on a god of their choice. The unit goals are for students to understand Greek mythology in the novel and how the gods impact characters. It will require computers, PowerPoint, and the computer lab. Accommodations include assisting struggling readers and providing additional challenges for gifted students. Standards addressed include English language arts standards on literary analysis and writing, as well as ISTE technology standards.
This presentation provides an overview of text complexity and the Common Core State Standards. It discusses the history of approaches to reading instruction and texts used in classrooms over time. It then explains the three elements of text complexity - quantitative, qualitative, and reader and task considerations. Specific examples are given to demonstrate how to evaluate texts using these three elements. The presentation concludes by discussing types of texts and genres outlined in the Common Core and providing resources for more information on text complexity.
The document discusses how learners acquire a new language. It mentions that a learner's motives, needs, attitudes, and emotional states filter what they hear from the language, affecting the quality of their acquisition. This filtering determines what language models and parts of the language the learner focuses on first, as well as how quickly and for how long they acquire the language. The filtering also guides the overall acquisition process by limiting what can be learned and rejecting material that does not fit the learner's emerging language system.
This document provides an introduction to second language acquisition by Rod Ellis. It defines second language acquisition as learning a language other than one's mother tongue, inside or outside the classroom. The goals of SLA are to describe how L2 is acquired and to explain differences in learners' success. Factors that influence acquisition include social environment, learner input, and individual cognitive abilities. The document discusses methodological issues in describing learner language and explaining the acquisition process.
Factors that influence second language acquisition and learninglislieroyo1
This document discusses several key factors that influence second language acquisition, including motivation, attitude, age, intelligence, aptitude, learning styles, and personality. Motivation is one of the most important factors, and can be either integrative, relating to interest in the language and its culture, or instrumental, relating to practical uses of the language. Other important influences include a learner's attitude towards the language and its community, their age and any critical periods for language learning, general and multiple types of intelligence, as well as their language learning aptitude, style, personality traits like inhibition, anxiety and empathy.
This document discusses several factors that can influence second language acquisition:
1. Age - Younger learners acquire language faster but older learners learn at a faster rate. Adults have a disadvantage with pronunciation but an advantage in learning rate.
2. Aptitude - An individual's natural ability to learn language, consisting of abilities like identifying sound patterns and inferring rules. Aptitude contributes to but does not determine proficiency.
3. Motivation - A key factor in SLA, it can be integrative, instrumental, intrinsic, or extrinsic. Instrumental motivation tends to lead to better performance according to some research. Attitudes and motivation are interrelated and can change over time with external
The document discusses academic vocabulary and identifying Tier 2 words for vocabulary instruction. It provides criteria for determining which Tier 2 words are most appropriate to teach, including words that students will see often across texts, will be useful for their own writing, relate to other known words and ideas, are significant to meaning or tone, and cannot be inferred from context. Examples are given of applying these criteria to sample words to decide whether they should be addressed through instruction. The goal of vocabulary instruction is for students to thoroughly understand and be able to use words in a variety of contexts.
Error analysis of the writings of undergraduate students of comsats lahoreAzam Almubarki
This study analyzes writing errors made by undergraduate students from different departments at COMSATS Lahore. It categorizes errors based on previous frameworks and analyzes writing samples from 45 students across 5 departments. The study finds differences in the types and frequencies of errors made between departments. It aims to identify common errors and compare error rates to understand challenges for English language learners.
Error analysis is the process of identifying, classifying, and describing errors made by language learners. It provides insight into common difficulties faced by learners in speaking or writing a target language. There are two types of errors - mistakes, which occur when a learner does not apply a known rule consistently, and errors, which occur when a rule has not been learned. Sources of errors include influence from the learner's native language, incorrect transfer of rules within the target language, and issues related to the learning context and process. The document then describes a methodology for conducting error analysis on student assignments, categorizing the errors found, and analyzing the results.
This document discusses cross-linguistic influence and learner language. It covers the contrastive analysis hypothesis and how it evolved into analyzing cross-linguistic influence. The document also discusses markedness theory, learner language, error analysis, types of errors, sources of errors, stages of learner language development, and approaches to treating errors. It provides a detailed overview of the theoretical framework for understanding how a learner's first language can influence their acquisition of a second language.
Differences of learners in second language acquisitionAuver2012
There are several factors that contribute to differences in how quickly or successfully individuals acquire a second language:
Age - Younger learners have advantages like brain plasticity and weaker identity, while older learners' advantages include learning capacity, analytic ability, and life experience.
Sex - Studies show females tend to acquire a second language faster due to greater motivation and sociability.
Aptitude - Includes abilities like phonemic coding, grammar sensitivity, inductive learning, and memory that determine an individual's language learning ability.
Motivation - Requires effort, desire, and positive attitudes towards integrating with the target culture or gaining benefits from the second language.
Cognitive styles and learning strategies - How individuals prefer
This thesis examines the omission of subject pronouns in writing tasks of pre-intermediate English language learners. The researcher aims to study the frequency of omission and whether factors like gender, age, or prior English exposure affect rates of omission. Writing samples from 11 students aged 13-18 will be analyzed using checklists to code omissions. Results will help teachers understand common errors to address in teaching writing.
This document outlines steps for developing a listening test, including:
1. Specifying the skills to be tested such as understanding gist, factual information, interactions, and recognizing attitudes, opinions, and intentions.
2. Setting criterial levels of performance and appropriate response types.
3. Selecting authentic speech samples and writing multiple choice, short answer, gap fill, and other item types to test comprehension without replaying passages.
4. Having test items and recordings reviewed by colleagues before administration.
The document discusses theories of second language acquisition including Krashen's theory which consists of 5 hypotheses: 1) the acquisition-learning hypothesis, 2) the monitor hypothesis, 3) the natural order hypothesis, 4) the input hypothesis, and 5) the affective filter hypothesis. It also briefly mentions Swain's output hypothesis which posits that output promotes language learning. Additionally, it covers Cummins' common underlying proficiency theory and the differences between context-embedded and context-reduced communication.
Attitudes, motivation, and second language learningAlexis Viera
This meta-analysis examined the relationship between second language achievement and five attitudinal/motivational variables - integrativeness, attitudes toward learning situation, motivation, integrative orientation, and instrumental orientation - across 75 studies involving over 10,000 individuals. The analysis found that correlations between achievement and motivation were consistently higher than between achievement and the other variables. Neither availability of studies nor age of participants significantly impacted the relationships. The goal of the research was to analyze the importance of motivation on second language learning.
“The state of the field effects of program type, personality, and language b...mmebrady
This document summarizes a presentation given by Amanda Brown and her graduate students on the state of research regarding effects of program type, teacher personality, and language background on second language classrooms. The presentation covered comparisons of standard, intensive, and immersion language programs; the role of teacher personality; and a review of student and teacher perceptions of non-native English speaking teachers. While research on some topics like the impact of personality is inconclusive, intensive programs appear more effective than standard, and both students and teachers perceive benefits and limitations to non-native teacher status.
The document discusses Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) framework for categorizing the cognitive complexity of standards, objectives, and assessment items. It explains that DOK is a scale from 1-4 that measures the depth of understanding and processing required rather than just the difficulty of verbs or topics. Level 1 involves recall of facts, Level 2 basic skills and concepts, Level 3 strategic thinking, and Level 4 extended thinking such as analyzing and synthesizing across sources. Examples are provided for each DOK level to illustrate the distinction between levels. The document emphasizes that DOK is about the complexity of thinking demanded rather than just vocabulary words.
The document discusses depth of knowledge (DOK) and its importance in education. DOK refers to the complexity of thinking required to complete a task, not its difficulty. It is assessed on a scale from 1 to 4, with higher levels requiring more strategic and extended thinking. The document notes that while tests like FCAT aim for 10-20% of questions to be at DOK level 1, instruction should focus more on developing higher-order thinking at DOK levels 3 and 4 in order to better prepare students. Aligning standards, instruction, and assessments based on DOK is key to promoting deeper understanding.
The document discusses individual differences in language aptitude. It defines aptitude as a learner's capacity for learning a task based on their enduring characteristics. Language aptitude refers to cognitive differences between learners and their ability to learn a language. Between 1920-1930, researchers developed early language aptitude tests to predict learners' performance. These tests used analytical and synthetic approaches. Modern tests like the MLAT and PLAB further researched aptitude and its components like memory, auditory ability, and linguistic ability. The document discusses ongoing issues around what aptitude measures, its relationship to age, intelligence, teaching methods, and the purpose of aptitude testing.
This document discusses research on individual differences in second language learning, noting that learners vary greatly in their success. It describes how this research has predominantly used quantitative methods like questionnaires and correlational analysis to study factors like abilities, propensities, beliefs and strategies. Issues are raised with solely relying on self-reported questionnaires and different studies using varying instruments to measure the same constructs.
The teacher, Erlyn Fukushima, is creating a 5 week unit on the novel "The Lightning Thief" that incorporates Greek mythology. Students will read the novel and myths, learn about different gods, and create a PowerPoint presentation on a god of their choice. The unit goals are for students to understand Greek mythology in the novel and how the gods impact characters. It will require computers, PowerPoint, and the computer lab. Accommodations include assisting struggling readers and providing additional challenges for gifted students. Standards addressed include English language arts standards on literary analysis and writing, as well as ISTE technology standards.
This presentation provides an overview of text complexity and the Common Core State Standards. It discusses the history of approaches to reading instruction and texts used in classrooms over time. It then explains the three elements of text complexity - quantitative, qualitative, and reader and task considerations. Specific examples are given to demonstrate how to evaluate texts using these three elements. The presentation concludes by discussing types of texts and genres outlined in the Common Core and providing resources for more information on text complexity.
The document discusses how learners acquire a new language. It mentions that a learner's motives, needs, attitudes, and emotional states filter what they hear from the language, affecting the quality of their acquisition. This filtering determines what language models and parts of the language the learner focuses on first, as well as how quickly and for how long they acquire the language. The filtering also guides the overall acquisition process by limiting what can be learned and rejecting material that does not fit the learner's emerging language system.
This document provides an introduction to second language acquisition by Rod Ellis. It defines second language acquisition as learning a language other than one's mother tongue, inside or outside the classroom. The goals of SLA are to describe how L2 is acquired and to explain differences in learners' success. Factors that influence acquisition include social environment, learner input, and individual cognitive abilities. The document discusses methodological issues in describing learner language and explaining the acquisition process.
Factors that influence second language acquisition and learninglislieroyo1
This document discusses several key factors that influence second language acquisition, including motivation, attitude, age, intelligence, aptitude, learning styles, and personality. Motivation is one of the most important factors, and can be either integrative, relating to interest in the language and its culture, or instrumental, relating to practical uses of the language. Other important influences include a learner's attitude towards the language and its community, their age and any critical periods for language learning, general and multiple types of intelligence, as well as their language learning aptitude, style, personality traits like inhibition, anxiety and empathy.
This document discusses several factors that can influence second language acquisition:
1. Age - Younger learners acquire language faster but older learners learn at a faster rate. Adults have a disadvantage with pronunciation but an advantage in learning rate.
2. Aptitude - An individual's natural ability to learn language, consisting of abilities like identifying sound patterns and inferring rules. Aptitude contributes to but does not determine proficiency.
3. Motivation - A key factor in SLA, it can be integrative, instrumental, intrinsic, or extrinsic. Instrumental motivation tends to lead to better performance according to some research. Attitudes and motivation are interrelated and can change over time with external
The document discusses academic vocabulary and identifying Tier 2 words for vocabulary instruction. It provides criteria for determining which Tier 2 words are most appropriate to teach, including words that students will see often across texts, will be useful for their own writing, relate to other known words and ideas, are significant to meaning or tone, and cannot be inferred from context. Examples are given of applying these criteria to sample words to decide whether they should be addressed through instruction. The goal of vocabulary instruction is for students to thoroughly understand and be able to use words in a variety of contexts.
Error analysis of the writings of undergraduate students of comsats lahoreAzam Almubarki
This study analyzes writing errors made by undergraduate students from different departments at COMSATS Lahore. It categorizes errors based on previous frameworks and analyzes writing samples from 45 students across 5 departments. The study finds differences in the types and frequencies of errors made between departments. It aims to identify common errors and compare error rates to understand challenges for English language learners.
Error analysis is the process of identifying, classifying, and describing errors made by language learners. It provides insight into common difficulties faced by learners in speaking or writing a target language. There are two types of errors - mistakes, which occur when a learner does not apply a known rule consistently, and errors, which occur when a rule has not been learned. Sources of errors include influence from the learner's native language, incorrect transfer of rules within the target language, and issues related to the learning context and process. The document then describes a methodology for conducting error analysis on student assignments, categorizing the errors found, and analyzing the results.
This document discusses cross-linguistic influence and learner language. It covers the contrastive analysis hypothesis and how it evolved into analyzing cross-linguistic influence. The document also discusses markedness theory, learner language, error analysis, types of errors, sources of errors, stages of learner language development, and approaches to treating errors. It provides a detailed overview of the theoretical framework for understanding how a learner's first language can influence their acquisition of a second language.
Differences of learners in second language acquisitionAuver2012
There are several factors that contribute to differences in how quickly or successfully individuals acquire a second language:
Age - Younger learners have advantages like brain plasticity and weaker identity, while older learners' advantages include learning capacity, analytic ability, and life experience.
Sex - Studies show females tend to acquire a second language faster due to greater motivation and sociability.
Aptitude - Includes abilities like phonemic coding, grammar sensitivity, inductive learning, and memory that determine an individual's language learning ability.
Motivation - Requires effort, desire, and positive attitudes towards integrating with the target culture or gaining benefits from the second language.
Cognitive styles and learning strategies - How individuals prefer
This thesis examines the omission of subject pronouns in writing tasks of pre-intermediate English language learners. The researcher aims to study the frequency of omission and whether factors like gender, age, or prior English exposure affect rates of omission. Writing samples from 11 students aged 13-18 will be analyzed using checklists to code omissions. Results will help teachers understand common errors to address in teaching writing.
This document outlines steps for developing a listening test, including:
1. Specifying the skills to be tested such as understanding gist, factual information, interactions, and recognizing attitudes, opinions, and intentions.
2. Setting criterial levels of performance and appropriate response types.
3. Selecting authentic speech samples and writing multiple choice, short answer, gap fill, and other item types to test comprehension without replaying passages.
4. Having test items and recordings reviewed by colleagues before administration.
The document discusses theories of second language acquisition including Krashen's theory which consists of 5 hypotheses: 1) the acquisition-learning hypothesis, 2) the monitor hypothesis, 3) the natural order hypothesis, 4) the input hypothesis, and 5) the affective filter hypothesis. It also briefly mentions Swain's output hypothesis which posits that output promotes language learning. Additionally, it covers Cummins' common underlying proficiency theory and the differences between context-embedded and context-reduced communication.
Attitudes, motivation, and second language learningAlexis Viera
This meta-analysis examined the relationship between second language achievement and five attitudinal/motivational variables - integrativeness, attitudes toward learning situation, motivation, integrative orientation, and instrumental orientation - across 75 studies involving over 10,000 individuals. The analysis found that correlations between achievement and motivation were consistently higher than between achievement and the other variables. Neither availability of studies nor age of participants significantly impacted the relationships. The goal of the research was to analyze the importance of motivation on second language learning.
“The state of the field effects of program type, personality, and language b...mmebrady
This document summarizes a presentation given by Amanda Brown and her graduate students on the state of research regarding effects of program type, teacher personality, and language background on second language classrooms. The presentation covered comparisons of standard, intensive, and immersion language programs; the role of teacher personality; and a review of student and teacher perceptions of non-native English speaking teachers. While research on some topics like the impact of personality is inconclusive, intensive programs appear more effective than standard, and both students and teachers perceive benefits and limitations to non-native teacher status.
The document discusses Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) framework for categorizing the cognitive complexity of standards, objectives, and assessment items. It explains that DOK is a scale from 1-4 that measures the depth of understanding and processing required rather than just the difficulty of verbs or topics. Level 1 involves recall of facts, Level 2 basic skills and concepts, Level 3 strategic thinking, and Level 4 extended thinking such as analyzing and synthesizing across sources. Examples are provided for each DOK level to illustrate the distinction between levels. The document emphasizes that DOK is about the complexity of thinking demanded rather than just vocabulary words.
The document discusses depth of knowledge (DOK) and its importance in education. DOK refers to the complexity of thinking required to complete a task, not its difficulty. It is assessed on a scale from 1 to 4, with higher levels requiring more strategic and extended thinking. The document notes that while tests like FCAT aim for 10-20% of questions to be at DOK level 1, instruction should focus more on developing higher-order thinking at DOK levels 3 and 4 in order to better prepare students. Aligning standards, instruction, and assessments based on DOK is key to promoting deeper understanding.
The document discusses Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) framework, which is used to align academic standards and assessments based on cognitive complexity. The DOK has four levels ranging from simple recall to extended strategic thinking. Level 1 involves recall tasks, Level 2 focuses on skills and concepts, Level 3 requires strategic thinking, and Level 4 deals with complex reasoning. The DOK level is determined by the intended learning outcome rather than the difficulty of tasks or verbs used. Teachers must ensure instruction matches the DOK level of standards to promote student achievement.
The document discusses depth of knowledge (DOK) and Webb's four levels of cognitive complexity. It provides examples of tasks at each DOK level, from simple recall (Level 1) to more complex strategic thinking (Level 3) and extended thinking (Level 4). The key points are that DOK focuses on the complexity of thinking required rather than task difficulty, and that the intended learning outcomes determine the DOK level, not the verbs used.
1) The document discusses Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) framework for classifying standards, objectives, tasks and assessments based on the complexity of thinking required.
2) DOK has four levels - recall and reproduction, skills and concepts, strategic thinking, and extended thinking. It is important to ensure standards, instruction and assessments are aligned to the DOK levels.
3) While verbs used may signal complexity, the real determiner is the cognitive demand of the task - what students are asked to do. DOK is not about difficulty but about the depth of understanding required.
The document provides information about a professional development for teachers at Albuquerque Public Schools on the 2013-14 evaluation system. It discusses a three-part evaluation system that includes student achievement, observations, and multiple measures. It outlines the teacher observation cycle and scoring process. The professional development will focus on understanding the evaluation domains and competencies, using strategies like close reading and artifact matching to analyze teaching performance levels.
This presentation has/will be used with K-12 Math teachers to explore the concept of Depth of Knowledge in order to apply this information to resources and assessments in order to insure there is an appropriate level of DOK in our courses.
This document outlines steps for unpacking essential standards and creating learning targets:
1. Identify key words in standards like verbs and nouns.
2. Map out what students will do, with what knowledge, and in what context based on Bloom's Taxonomy levels.
3. Create learning targets specifying expectations for student performance, context, complexity, and exemplars.
4. Establish guiding questions for instruction.
5. Determine assessments and timelines to check student understanding.
The example standard is about engaging in discussions, and the learning target has students citing evidence using "According to..."
The document discusses Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) model, which is used to align academic standards and assessments. It describes the four DOK levels - recall and reproduction (Level 1), skills and concepts (Level 2), strategic thinking (Level 3), and extended thinking (Level 4) - and provides examples of assessment items for each level. The key points are that DOK focuses on the cognitive demand required by an assessment item or standard, not its difficulty, and is used to ensure standards and assessments match in complexity as required by No Child Left Behind.
The document outlines a 5-step process for unpacking and planning instruction around essential standards:
1) Identify key words in standards like verbs and nouns.
2) Map out what students will do, with what knowledge, and in what context based on the standard.
3) Analyze the level of thinking required by the standard.
4) Determine learning targets and exemplars to communicate expectations.
5) Establish guiding questions and plan assessments to check for understanding.
An example standard and target are provided, focusing on participating in discussions and following discussion rules.
This document discusses Depth of Knowledge (DOK) and how it can be applied in the classroom. DOK refers to the cognitive demand or rigor required to correctly answer test questions or complete classroom activities. There are 4 levels of DOK, with higher levels requiring greater conceptual understanding and cognitive processing from students. The document provides examples of classroom activities and assessments at each DOK level for various subjects. It also discusses how teachers can help students develop higher-order thinking skills through strategies like think-alouds, where teachers model their thinking process for students.
This document discusses how Depth of Knowledge (DOK) and Bloom's Taxonomy can be used as tools to increase cognitive rigor in the classroom and better align instruction and assessments with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). It defines DOK as referring to the complexity of thinking required rather than difficulty, and outlines the four DOK levels - from basic recall to extended thinking. The document provides examples of how to create tasks at higher DOK levels and emphasizes the need to routinely operate students at the higher levels of thinking to prepare them for 21st century jobs.
The document summarizes a presentation about vocabulary instruction and the Common Core State Standards. It discusses how the standards address vocabulary and academic vocabulary. It also explores strategies for teaching vocabulary, such as using context clues, the SLAP strategy, and the six-step process from Marzano. Examples are provided for each strategy.
The document provides a lesson plan for teaching first grade students reading comprehension skills. The lesson focuses on identifying characters, settings, and key details in stories. Students will participate in a discussion about a story read aloud, answering questions to demonstrate their understanding. Formative assessment will involve observation and anecdotal notes during discussion. Intervention plans are outlined for students who do not meet expectations, including smaller group work and focusing on one skill at a time.
The document outlines a lesson plan for a 1st grade adapted curriculum class. The lesson focuses on teaching students to identify characters, settings, and key details in stories. The teacher will begin by playing a familiarization game with students and then read a story aloud, stopping regularly to ask questions and prompt students. Students will then work independently to listen to another story and answer teacher questions to assess comprehension. The teacher will use informal observations and anecdotal notes to evaluate student understanding during discussions. Intervention plans are outlined for students struggling to understand.
This document provides an overview of strategies to support literacy in content area classes. It emphasizes that all teachers are responsible for teaching literacy skills and that content area teachers are best positioned to help students meet literacy challenges in their subjects. The document outlines strategies to use before, during, and after reading to improve comprehension, such as linking new concepts to prior knowledge, teaching vocabulary, using graphic organizers, and having students reflect on and apply what they've learned.
This document discusses standards-based instructional practices. It notes that scores on South Dakota reading assessments have been low in certain areas. It presents hypotheses for this, including that classroom rigor may not meet assessment rigor. It introduces the Standards In Practice model for ensuring classroom assignments demonstrate proficiency in content standards. The 6-step model includes teachers completing assignments, analyzing task demands, identifying standards, creating rubrics, scoring student work, and revising instruction as needed based on results. Bloom's Taxonomy and rigor are discussed in the context of this process.
This document discusses standards-based instructional practices. It notes that scores on South Dakota reading assessments have been low in certain areas. It presents hypotheses for this, including that classroom rigor may not match assessment rigor. It introduces the Standards In Practice model, a 6-step process for ensuring classroom assignments demonstrate proficiency in content standards. Steps include completing assignments, analyzing task demands, identifying standards, creating rubrics, scoring student work, and revising instruction based on results. Bloom's Taxonomy and rigor are discussed in the context of aligning standards, instruction, and assessment.
This document discusses standards-based instructional practices. It notes that scores on South Dakota reading assessments have been low in certain areas. It presents hypotheses for this, including that classroom rigor may not match assessment rigor. It introduces the Standards In Practice model, a 6-step process for ensuring classroom assignments demonstrate proficiency in content standards. Steps include completing assignments, analyzing task demands, identifying standards, creating rubrics, scoring student work, and revising instruction based on results. Bloom's Taxonomy and rigor are discussed in the context of aligning standards, instruction, and assessment.
This was a 45-minute presentation on Depth of Knowledge to Secondary Principals on 2/27/2014 as a preview of training to be delivered to Northshore School District teachers.
Similar to Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc (20)
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
1. {
Literacy Work Aligned with
Common Core Standards,
Depths of Knowledge, & PARCC
Patty McGee, Coordinator of Professional Learning in Literacy
Northern Valley Curriculum Center
pattymcgee33@gmail.com
2. Thank you for…
Participating actively in the work
Listening with the intent to learn
Offering your own thoughts and
ideas
Supporting the learning of others
Being present – silence phones,
etc.
Norms
3. Jigsaw
Read the article and be prepared to talk
abou the following questions:
1. What does the author want you to
know or understand?
2. What is evidence of this
understanding?
3. What do you think about this?
6. Why Depth
of Knowledge (DoK)?
Mechanism to ensure that:
• The intent of the standard and the level of
student demonstration required by that
standard matches the assessment items
• Teachers are teaching to a level that will
promote student achievement
7. It’s NOT about the verb...
The Depth of Knowledge is NOT
determined by the verb (Bloom’s
Taxonomy), but by the context in
which the verb is used and the
depth of thinking required.
8. Same Verb—Three Different DOK Levels
DOK 1- Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks.
(Requires simple recall)
DOK 2- Describe the difference between metamorphic and
igneous rocks. (Requires cognitive processing to determine
the differences in the two rock types)
DOK 3- Describe a model that you might use to represent the
relationships that exist within the rock cycle. (Requires
deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of
how best to represent it)
9. Same Verb—Three Different DOK Levels
DOK 1- Describe what a theme is. (Requires simple recall)
DOK 2- Describe the difference theme and plot. (Requires
cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two
literary elements)
DOK 3- Describe the common theme in two texts and critique
which author better addresses the theme. (Requires deep
understanding of theme, evidence, and craft using more
complex thinking to create something original)
10. Same Verb—Three Different DOK Levels
DOK 1- Describe what a primary source is. (Requires simple
recall)
DOK 2- Describe the difference between primary source and
a secondary source. (Requires cognitive processing to
determine the differences in two elements)
DOK 3- Describe how you might use a primary source and a
secondary source to better understand a particular event in
history. (Requires deep understanding of use of sources
and an explanation of ‘how’)
12. Level 1: Recall and Reproduction
Level 2: Skills & Concepts
Level 3: Strategic Thinking
Level 4: Extended Thinking
Webb’s Four Levels of
Cognitive Complexity
13. • Requires recall of information, such as a fact,
definition, term, or performance of a simple process
or procedure
• Answering a Level 1 item can involve following a
simple, well-known procedure or formula
DOK Level 1:
Recall and Reproduction
14. Skills/Concepts: DOK Level 2
• Includes the engagement of some mental
processing beyond recalling or reproducing a
response
• Items require students to make some decisions as
to how to approach the question or problem
• Actions imply more than one mental or cognitive
process/step
15. Strategic Thinking: Level 3
• Requires deep understanding exhibited through
planning, using evidence, and more demanding
cognitive reasoning
• The cognitive demands are complex and
abstract
• A guiding question with more than one possible
answer and requires students to justify the
response
16. Extended Thinking: Level 4
• Requires high cognitive demand and is very complex
• Students are expected to make connections, relate
ideas within the content or among content areas, and
devise one approach among many alternatives on how
the situation can be solved
• Due to the complexity of cognitive demand, DOK 4
often requires an extended period of time
20. What do the standards say?
What are some highlights and important
parts?
What should we infer?
What should we avoid?
How does this align with current instruction?
How does it differ?
Studying Each Strand:
Questions for Consideration
21. Tier 1, 2, 3 Words
Tier 1: the most basic words, found often in
conversation, rarely require instruction (tired,
run, dog, warm)
Tier 2: high utility and found most often in
written text, have a powerful impact on verbal
functioning (contradict, freedom, devour)
Tier 3: infrequently used words, often limited to
specific topic or domain, best used when a
need arises (stamen, petal, leaf,
photosynthesis)
22. A Test for Tier 2 vs. Tier 3
Words:
If you can predict the words
likely to be used in a specific
text, it is probably a Tier 3.
If you can’t it is probably a Tier
2.
24. Goal of Assessment – The PARCC assessments will enable
teachers, schools, students and their parents to gain important
insights into how well critical knowledge, skills and abilities
essential for young people to thrive in college and careers are
being mastered.
The PARCC Assessment Review
35. PARCC is designed to reward
quality instruction aligned to the
Standards,
so the assessment is worthy of preparation
rather than a distraction from good work.
What kind of instruction is
rewarded by your assessments?
Assess your Assessments
37. Wrapping it up…
What shifts do you notice
in the standards?
What themes have
emerged in our
conversations and
reading?
What are the next steps
from here?
Editor's Notes
Words like explain or analyze have to be considered in context.
“Explain to me where you live” does not raise the DOK of a simple rote response.
Even if the student has to use addresses or landmarks, the student is doing nothing more than recalling and reciting
What comes after the verb is more important than the verb itself.
“Analyze this sentence to decide if the commas have been used correctly” does not meet the criteria for high cognitive processing.”
The student who has been taught the rule for using commas is merely using the rule.
Think about the verb…. Make whatever follows less or more complex.
Level 1- required definition, something I can google and find answer to (STANDARDS NOT SPENDING AS MUCH TIME HERE)
Level 2- little more complex thinking- not take too long, some comparing, slightly more complex, might hear varied answers, but fairly basic
Level 3- describe and critique- this is more complex – not one answer, takes more time, and they need to draw upon different sources and knowledge to answer this question
This level ¾ is the spirit the standards were written.
Level 1 or 2 are steps to 3 and 4, still important….. But shouldn’t be the only ones that we pay attention to.
Level one can be difficult but not always complex…….it could be hard, but I can find the answer, so not complex (tell the 50 state capitals)
Instruction and classroom assessments must reflect the DOK level of the objective or intended learning outcome.
Pick content free – to give example
Lego club, young kids-
Id different types of legos- kinds colors, one bump, two etc… – level one
Create figure based on diagram- level two (use skills and concepts in production)
Now create without model, w/o instructions but perhaps based on old designs learned… (level 3)
*students who read materials in lieu of what they should be reading, like spark notes, could answer the questions at level 1 or 2, but not 3 or 4
READING: Use a dictionary to find the meaning of words WRITING: Use punctuation marks correctly
Identify figurative language in a reading passage Identify Standard English grammatical structures & refer to resources for correction
List animals that survive by eating other animals
Locate or recall facts found in text
Describe physical features of places
Determine the perimeter or area of rectangles given a drawing or labels
See tasks for level 1 DOK
Identify elements of music using music terminology
Identify basic rules for participating in simple games and activities
READING: Use context cues to identify the meaning of unfamiliar words WRITING: Construct compound sentences
Predict a logical outcome based on information in a reading selection Use simple organizational strategies to structure written
Identify and summarize the major events in a narrative work
Write summaries that contain the main idea of the reading selection and pertinent details
See the level 2 tasks
Compare desert and tropical environments
Identify and summarize the major events, problems, solutions, conflicts in literary text
Explain the cause-effect of historical events
Predict a logical outcome based on information in a reading selection
Explain how good work habits are important at home, school, and on the job
Classify plane and three dimensional figures
Describe various styles of music
READING: Determine the author’s purpose and describe how it affects the interpretation of a reading selection
Summarize info from multiple sources to address a specific topic
Analyze and describe the characteristics of various types of literature
WRITING: Support ideas with details and examples
Use voice appropriate to purpose and audience
Edit writing to produce a logical progression of ideas
Compare consumer actions and analyze how these actions impact the environment
Analyze or evaluate the effectiveness of literary elements (e.g., characterization, setting, point of view, conflict and resolution, plot structures)
Solve a multiple-step problem and provide support with a mathematical explanation that justifies the answer
Develop a scientific model for a complex idea
Propose and evaluate solutions for an economic problem
Explain, generalize or connect ideas, using supporting evidence from a text or source
Create a dance that represents the characteristics of a culture
READING:
Analyze and synthesize information from multiple sources
Examine and explain alternative perspectives across a variety of sources
Describe and illustrate how common themes are found across texts from different cultures
WRITING:
Write an analysis of two selections, identifying the common theme and generating a purpose that is appropriate for both
Gather, analyze, organize, and interpret information from multiple (print and non print) sources to draft a reasoned report
Analyzing author’s craft (e.g., style, bias, literary techniques, point of view)
Look at the workbook pages and see where they fall in DoK
Look at task cards and see where these fall in DoK
Create an exercise plan applying the “FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type) Principle”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAg3uMlNyHA
Students must talk to deepen comprehension– see viewpoints that you never would have thought about. The more successful students seek out study groups or buddies– a natural progression for students.
Partner and read the first two stanzas, and then jot about it. Play video up to that part as well. Then write notes on the left hand side for written, left hand side for movie.
Experts who study proficient readers, eyes go down and back up, they are constantly rereading
This poem goes back and forth between time, also a great way to study authors craft if writing memoir– also within opinion writing, commodity gives you a false sense of confidence– debate protocol
As Mary stated in the article (‘Unlocking the Secrets of Complex Text’), when we teach students that most texts are about more than one thing, we lead them to read more closely. To get students to read this way, she suggests looking for texts that are engaging (willing to work hard) and complex (if they so the work, it pays off…gain new insights and epiphanies)
I wanted us to try a lesson on a piece of text that you, and your students will find engaging to try out close reading practices…
Then we’ll look at ‘visual text’ (the video for the song) to deepen our understanding and talk about how this could help deepen our students’ comprehension **Common Core Standard Reading Standard 7 for grades 6-12 asks us to look at video, performances, etc.
Read this text and then talk with a partner…who is in it? and what does it seem to be about? (Use the left side of your lyrics to jot notes as you read (can also underline, circle, highlight)
One of the ways you increase comprehension and help you see complexity in the text is to compare your thinking with someone else’s.
Close reading is about wanting to see more in the text.
With complex text, there may be more than one message or underlying theme
Repeated reading is key
Deepens comprehension
Notice more
Strong readers go back and reread during – not finish the book and read it again, but right away
Experts have tracked the eyes of proficient readers, they go down then back up quickly
Use lenses to sharpen vision
Signs of complicated conflict
Clues that new ideas are being introduced
Annotate to really trace author’s craft and how reader’s thinking changes
Close reading can be motivating and get students ready for debate or argument writing
Or, if writing memoir, go back and look at craft moves – complex text moves through time, back and forth
Look for texts that are the same topic, different authors. Compare craft & structure. (author suggestions for this work: Gail Gibbons vs Seymour Simon)
Be alert for parts you don’t understand! (also, you can’t do deep reading work on text you can’t read)
Available to all students (i.e., not limited to students with IEPs, 504 plans, or English learners), but will be selected and “turned on” by school-based educators prior to the assessment, based on each student’s Personal Needs Profile (PNP).
Based on each student’s individual needs, a PNP is created for the student to ensure that he or she receives appropriate access without the distraction of other tools and features that are not required by the student.
Although school-based educators will enable specific accessibility features for students, the student will decide whether or not to use the feature. These accessibility features will be readily available on the computer-delivered testing platform.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS FOR ALL STUDENTS:
Detailed guidelines on the administration of the PARCC assessments will be included in the PARCC Test Administration Manual.
Principals may determine that any student may require one or more of the following test administration considerations, regardless of the student’s status as a student with a disability or who is an English learner:
Small group testing
Frequent breaks
Time of day
Separate or alternate location
Specified area or seating
Adaptive and specialized equipment or furniture
UNIQUE/EMERGENCY ACCOMMODATIONS:
A small number of students may require additional accommodations either because they are not listed in the PARCC manual, or they do not have an IEP or 504 plan but require an accommodation as a result of a recently-occurring accident or illness.
PARCC states will review requests for unique accommodations in their respective states on an individual basis and will provide approval after determining whether the accommodation would result in a valid score for the student, using guidelines comparable across PARCC states.