3. Introductionof
Behaviorism:
Behaviorism was introduced in the early 20th century
as a major school of thought in psychology.
John B. Watson is credited with formalizing
behaviorism in 1913.
He published "Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It,"
outlining the principles of behaviorism.
Behaviorism gained prominence as a dominant
paradigm in psychology during the 1920s and 1930s.
4. Foundational
Principles:
EMPIRICISM:
Behaviorists emphasize empiricism, the idea that
knowledge comes from direct observation and
measurement of behavior.
They focus on studying observable and measurable
aspects of behavior.
STIMULUS AND RESPONSE:
Central to behaviorism is the concept of stimulus and
response.
Behaviorists believe that behavior is a reaction to external
stimuli, and they analyze the relationships between
stimuli and observable responses.
5. Foundational
Principles:
REJECTING MENTALISM:
Behaviorism rejects the study of mental states, thoughts, and consciousness.
It maintains that subjective experiences are not suitable for scientific
investigation. Instead, the focus is on objective, observable behaviors.
CONDITIONING:
Behaviorism introduces the concept of conditioning, which involves learning
associations between stimuli and responses.
There are two main types of conditioning:Classical Conditioning:
Associating a neutral stimulus with an involuntary response (occur automatically).
Operant Conditioning: Associating a behavior with its consequences (B.F.
Skinner's work on reinforcement and punishment).
6. Foundational
Principles:
OBSERVABLE BEHAVIOR:
Behaviorists insist on studying behavior that is directly
observable and measurable.
This emphasis on overt actions allows for a more
scientific and objective approach to psychology.
FOCUS ON LEARNING:
Learning is a central concept in behaviorism.
Behaviorists believe that behavior is acquired through
various learning processes, such as conditioning,
reinforcement, and punishment.
7. Foundational
Principles:
ROLE OF REINFORCEMENT:
Reinforcement is a key principle in behaviorism, influencing the likelihood of a behavior
being repeated.
Positive reinforcement involves rewarding a behavior to increase its occurrence, while
negative reinforcement involves removing a negative stimulus to achieve the same effect.
OBSERVABLE OUTCOMES:
Behaviorists are primarily concerned with observable outcomes
and measurable changes in behavior.
They avoid speculating about internal mental processes.
8.
9. J.BWatson
viewson
Lingustics
John B. Watson, the founder of behaviorism, made
significant contributions to linking behaviorism with
linguistics through his ideas and emphasis on observable
behavior.
Psychology as an Objective Science:
In his 1913 paper, "Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It,"
Watson argued for a more objective and scientific approach to
psychology, emphasizing the importance of empirical
observation and measurable behavior.
Observable Behavior in Language:
Watson's principles were applied to the study of language,
considering language not as an abstract mental process but
as a set of observable behaviors.
This perspective was a departure from earlier introspective
methods.
10. J.BWatson
viewson
Lingustics
Learning through Conditioning:
Watson's behaviorism emphasized learning through conditioning.
He believed that language acquisition, like other behaviors, could
be explained by associations formed through conditioning.
Stimulus-Response Associations:
Watson's stimulus-response model became a fundamental concept
in behaviorism. He proposed that language behaviors, including
speech and comprehension, could be understood through the
establishment of stimulus-response associations.
Environmental Determinism in Language Acquisition:
Watson's behaviorism highlighted the role of the environment in
shaping behavior. Applied to linguistics, this meant that language
acquisition was influenced by external stimuli, reinforcement,
and environmental factors.
11. J.BWatson
viewson
Lingustics
Role of Imitation:
Watson acknowledged the role of imitation in the acquisition of language.
He proposed that individuals learn to speak by imitating the sounds and
patterns in their environment, supporting the behaviorist idea that behavior
is learned through observation and replication.
Practical Applications in Language Teaching:
Watson's behaviorist principles influenced educational practices, including
language teaching methodologies.
The emphasis on repetition, reinforcement, and conditioning was integrated
into language instruction, as seen in approaches like audiolingualism.
Limitations and Later Developments:
While Watson's behaviorism contributed to the initial link between
behaviorism and linguistics, his approach faced criticism for oversimplifying
the richness of human language.
Later developments in behaviorism, including B.F. Skinner's work,
expanded and refined behaviorist theories applied to linguistics.
13. BurrhusFrederic
Skinner
Considering free will to be an illusion, Skinner saw
human action as dependent on consequences of previous
actions, a theory he would articulate as the principle
of reinforcement: If the consequences to an action are bad,
there is a high chance the action will not be repeated; if
the consequences are good, the probability of the action
being repeated becomes stronger.
Verbal Behavior Theory
Background:
Skinner's "Verbal Behavior" theory, published in 1957, is a
seminal work in the field of behaviorism.
The theory emerged as part of Skinner's broader effort to
extend behaviorist principles to complex human
behaviors, including language.
14. BurrhusFrederic
Skinner
Behaviorist Foundations:
Skinner's behaviorism rejects the study of mental
processes and consciousness, focusing instead on
observable behaviors and their environmental
determinants.
He believed that all behaviors, including language, could
be analyzed and understood through the principles of
operant conditioning.
Operant Conditioning Applied to Language:
In "Verbal Behavior," Skinner applied operant
conditioning principles to the realm of language
acquisition and use.
Language, according to Skinner, is a set of learned
behaviors shaped by the consequences (reinforcements or
punishments) that follow verbal expressions.
15. Whatis
conditioning?
Conditioning in behaviorism refers to the process of learning associations between stimuli
and responses or between behaviors and their consequences. Classical conditioning
involves associating neutral stimuli with automatic responses, while operant conditioning
focuses on the strengthening or weakening of voluntary behaviors through reinforcements
or punishments.
Conditioning in behaviorism, introduced by pioneers such as Ivan Pavlov (classical
conditioning) and B.F. Skinner (operant conditioning), involves learning associations
between stimuli and responses or behaviors and their consequences.
In linguistics, conditioning refers to the influence that context or surrounding elements
have on the pronunciation or realization of linguistic elements. There are a couple of key
concepts related to conditioning in linguistics:
Phonological Conditioning:
Definition: The way in which the pronunciation of a sound in a word is influenced by the
sounds that surround it.
Example: In English, the pronunciation of the vowel sound in "cot" might be different from
the vowel sound in "code" due to the influence of the surrounding consonant sounds.
Morphological Conditioning:
Definition: The way in which the form or structure of a morpheme (the smallest unit of
meaning) is influenced by its linguistic or grammatical context.
Example: In English, the plural form of a noun is often conditioned by morphological rules
(e.g., adding "-s" to form plurals), but irregular plurals like "children" demonstrate
exceptions.
Syntactic Conditioning:
Definition: The influence of sentence structure and word order on the interpretation and
meaning of linguistic elements.
Example: In English, word order can change the meaning of a sentence (e.g., "The cat
chased the dog" vs. "The dog chased the cat").
In linguistic analysis, understanding how linguistic elements are conditioned by their
context is crucial for describing and explaining language patterns. These conditioning
factors help linguists uncover the regularities and rules that govern the structure and use
of language. The study of conditioning in linguistics contributes to our understanding of
phonology, morphology, and syntax, allowing linguists to formulate theories and models
that capture the systematic nature of language.
16. BurrhusFrederic
Skinner
Behaviorist Foundations:
Skinner's emphasis on observable behavior stems from the
foundational principles of behaviorism.
Behaviorism rejects the study of unobservable mental processes
and consciousness, focusing solely on measurable and observable
actions.
Rejecting Introspection:
Skinner was critical of introspection, the method used in
structuralism and early psychology, which relied on individuals
reporting their internal mental experiences.
He argued that subjective introspection lacked scientific rigor
and precision.
Operational Definitions:
Skinner advocated for operational definitions, which specify
observable and measurable behaviors rather than relying on
subjective interpretations.
This emphasis on operational definitions aligns with the
behaviorist commitment to studying only what can be directly
observed and measured.
Language as Observable Behavior:
Skinner extended the behaviorist approach to language by
treating it as a set of observable behaviors.
Instead of delving into the mental processes behind language,
Skinner focused on the external manifestations of language use.
Emphasis on Observable Behavior:
17. BurrhusFrederic
Skinner
Stimulus-Response Relationships:
Skinner's behaviorism breaks down language into stimulus-response
relationships.
Antecedents (stimuli) elicit observable behaviors (responses), and these
behaviors are influenced by consequences.
Verbal Operants as Observable Units:
The verbal operants identified by Skinner—mands, tacts, intraverbals, and
autoclitics—are observable units of language behavior.
This classification allows for the precise analysis of language in terms of
observable actions and their environmental triggers.
Practical Applications:
Emphasizing observable behavior has practical applications in research and
interventions.
It enables the objective analysis of language development, allowing for the
design of effective language interventions based on observable linguistic
behaviors.
Contribution to Scientific Study:
Skinner's emphasis on observable behavior contributes to the scientific rigor
of his work.
It aligns with the behaviorist goal of making psychology an objective and
empirical science by focusing on externally observable phenomena.
Limitations and Criticism:
Critics argue that a strict focus on observable behavior may oversimplify the
complexities of cognition and creativity involved in language.
Cognitive and linguistic processes may not be fully captured by purely
observable behaviors.
Emphasis on Observable Behavior:
18. BurrhusFredericSkinner
Operant Conditioning in Language Learning:
Skinner asserted that language acquisition occurs through operant
conditioning, a process where behaviors are shaped by their consequences.
In the context of language, individuals learn to produce certain verbal
behaviors based on the consequences (reinforcements) that follow.
Positive Reinforcement Examples:
Positive reinforcement involves the addition of a rewarding stimulus to
increase the likelihood of a behavior.
Example: A child says "please," and the positive reinforcement is receiving a
cookie. The child is more likely to use polite language in the future.
Negative Reinforcement Examples:
Negative reinforcement involves the removal of an aversive stimulus to
strengthen a behavior.
Example: A student completes their homework to avoid parental nagging.
The removal of the nagging reinforces the completion of homework.
Role of Caregivers in Language Development:
Skinner highlighted the crucial role of caregivers in reinforcing linguistic
behaviors during language development.
Caregivers provide positive reinforcement when children express
themselves correctly, shaping the development of language skills.
Shaping Language through Reinforcement:
Language is shaped through successive approximations, where initial
attempts at communication are reinforced, leading to more refined and
accurate linguistic expressions.
Example: A toddler attempts to say "water," and when the caregiver
positively reinforces this attempt, the child refines the pronunciation over
time.
Importance of
Reinforcement
in Language
Acquisition:
19. BurrhusFredericSkinner
Continuous Reinforcement in Early Language Learning:
Continuous reinforcement, where every correct response is reinforced, is often
prevalent in early language learning stages.
Example: When a toddler correctly identifies an object, the caregiver consistently
provides positive reinforcement, strengthening the association between words and
objects.
Transition to Intermittent Reinforcement:
As language skills develop, Skinner suggested a transition to intermittent
reinforcement to maintain and strengthen linguistic behaviors.
Example: Instead of reinforcing every correct pronunciation, a caregiver may
intermittently praise a child for using more complex language structures,
encouraging continued growth.
Extinction in Language Modification:
Skinner introduced the concept of extinction, where a behavior diminishes when
reinforcement is withheld.
Example: If a child has learned to say "please" for a cookie, but the caregiver no
longer provides the cookie, the behavior of saying "please" may gradually diminish.
Individual Differences in Reinforcement Sensitivity:
Skinner acknowledged individual differences in sensitivity to reinforcement,
emphasizing that what serves as a reinforcer can vary among individuals.
Example: One child may be motivated by verbal praise, while another may be
motivated by tangible rewards.
Application in Language Teaching:
Skinner's principles of reinforcement have practical applications in language
teaching, where educators can use positive reinforcement to encourage correct
language usage.
Example: In a language class, students receive positive feedback or rewards for
using newly learned vocabulary or grammatical structures.
Importance of
Reinforcement
in Language
Acquisition:
20. Practical
Applications:
Language Teaching:
Behaviorist principles have practical applications in language teaching, where the
focus is on shaping and reinforcing desired linguistic behaviors.
Example: In a language classroom, positive reinforcement, such as praise or
rewards, can be used to encourage students to use correct grammar, pronunciation,
or vocabulary.
Behavioral Interventions in Communication Disorders:
Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), a methodology rooted in behaviorism, is often
employed in interventions for communication disorders.
Example: In therapy for a child with autism who has language deficits, ABA
techniques may involve reinforcing correct communication attempts to promote
language development.
Operant Conditioning in Vocabulary Learning:
Vocabulary acquisition can be approached behaviorally through operant
conditioning, where the correct use of words is reinforced.
Example: A child learning a new language may be reinforced with praise or a
reward when correctly using new words in sentences.
Positive Reinforcement in Language Acquisition:
Positive reinforcement is a key behaviorist concept applied in language acquisition
to strengthen desired linguistic behaviors.
Example: When a child says "thank you" and receives positive feedback or a smile
from a caregiver, this positive reinforcement encourages the child to use polite
language.
Shaping Pronunciation:
Shaping, a behaviorist technique, involves reinforcing successive approximations of
a desired behavior. This can be applied to shape correct pronunciation.
Example: A language learner attempting to pronounce a difficult word may receive
positive reinforcement for each improvement in pronunciation, gradually shaping
the correct pronunciation.
21. Practical
Applications:
Error Correction through Operant Conditioning:
Behaviorism suggests that correcting errors through feedback can modify linguistic
behaviors over time.
Example: If a student makes a grammatical mistake, a teacher providing corrective
feedback and guidance serves as a form of operant conditioning to improve future
language usage.
Reinforcement in Language Development in Children:
Caregivers play a crucial role in reinforcing language development in children by
positively reinforcing correct language usage.
Example: A parent may reinforce a toddler's attempt to say "water" by praising the
effort, encouraging the child's continued language development.
Behaviorist Approaches in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL):
Behaviorist principles have been integrated into computer-assisted language
learning programs, where reinforcement is used to enhance language skills.
Example: Interactive language learning apps may provide positive reinforcement,
such as virtual rewards, for correct responses, motivating learners to engage with
the material.
Role of Positive Reinforcement in Language Motivation:
Positive reinforcement contributes to language motivation by creating a positive
association with language learning experiences.
Example: A language learner receiving positive feedback on their progress may feel
motivated to continue practicing and acquiring new language skills.
Practical Guidelines for Teachers:
Teachers often use behaviorist principles to establish clear expectations, provide
timely feedback, and use reinforcement strategies in language classrooms.
Example: A teacher might implement a reward system for students who
consistently participate actively in class discussions, reinforcing desired
communicative behaviors.
22. RejectionofInnate
Structures:
Behaviorist Stance on Innate Structures:
Behaviorism, including its application in linguistics, generally rejects the
idea of innate structures or predispositions governing language acquisition.
Behaviorists argue against the notion that humans are born with specific
linguistic structures or a universal grammar.
Skinner's Critique of Nativism:
B.F. Skinner, a prominent behaviorist, was critical of nativist theories, such
as Noam Chomsky's idea of a universal grammar.
Skinner argued that language, like any other behavior, could be entirely
explained through environmental influences, reinforcement, and
conditioning.
Language as Learned Behavior:
In rejecting innate structures, behaviorism asserts that language is a
learned behavior acquired through interactions with the environment.
Children learn language by imitating and being reinforced for correct
linguistic expressions, according to behaviorist perspectives.
Environmental Determinants of Language:
Behaviorists emphasize the role of external factors, including environmental
stimuli and social interactions, in shaping linguistic behaviors.
Language development, from their viewpoint, is a result of exposure to
linguistic input and reinforcement for appropriate language use.
Contrast with Nativist Theories:
Nativist theories propose that humans have inherent linguistic capabilities
or structures that guide language acquisition.
Behaviorism rejects this idea, suggesting that language skills are entirely
shaped by external experiences and behavioral conditioning.
23. RejectionofInnate
Structures:
Importance of Environmental Input:
According to behaviorism, the richness and complexity of
language arise from exposure to a diverse range of linguistic
stimuli in the environment.
Children learn the intricacies of language by being exposed to
various linguistic expressions and receiving reinforcement for
appropriate language use.
Empirical Basis for Language Learning:
Behaviorism advocates for an empirical, observable approach to
studying language learning, emphasizing the measurable impact
of environmental influences.
Researchers following behaviorist principles seek evidence of how
reinforcement and conditioning affect linguistic behaviors.
Language Variability Across Environments:
The rejection of innate structures accommodates the
understanding that language can vary across different cultural
and environmental contexts.
Behaviorism allows for the exploration of how linguistic
behaviors are shaped by specific environmental contingencies.
Critique of Innateness Hypothesis:
The rejection of innate structures is a critique of the innateness
hypothesis, asserting that language is not predetermined but
acquired through interactions with the environment.
Behaviorists argue that innate structures are unnecessary for
explaining the complexity of language acquisition.
24. Controversyand
Criticism:
Oversimplification of Language:
Critics argue that behaviorism, when applied to linguistics, tends to oversimplify
the complexity of language by reducing it to learned behaviors.
Languages exhibit intricate structures, creativity, and generativity, aspects that
may be overlooked by a strict behaviorist perspective.
Neglect of Cognitive Processes:
Behaviorism, in its rejection of internal mental processes, neglects the cognitive
aspects involved in language acquisition and production.
Critics argue that cognitive processes such as memory, abstraction, and problem-
solving play crucial roles in language use and should not be disregarded.
Limited Explanation for Creativity:
Behaviorism struggles to provide a satisfactory explanation for the creative aspects
of language, including novel sentence formation and linguistic innovation.
For example, the spontaneous creation of new words or expressions poses a
challenge for behaviorist accounts that rely solely on learned behaviors.
Chomskyan Critique:
Noam Chomsky, a prominent linguist, critiqued behaviorism, arguing that it
inadequately addresses the innate linguistic structures and universal grammar
inherent in humans.
Chomsky's work suggested that humans possess a biological predisposition for
language acquisition, challenging the purely environmental stance of behaviorism.
Inability to Explain Language Universals:
Behaviorism faces criticism for its difficulty in explaining linguistic universals—
commonalities found in diverse languages worldwide.
Critics argue that behaviorism may struggle to account for the existence of shared
linguistic features that extend beyond learned behaviors.
25. Controversyand
Criticism:
Neglect of Internal Representations:
Behaviorism's emphasis on observable behavior neglects the role of internal representations
and mental structures in language processing.
For instance, the mental representation of grammatical rules and structures is not directly
addressed within a strict behaviorist framework.
Overemphasis on Environmental Determinants:
Critics argue that behaviorism places an overemphasis on the external environment as the
sole determinant of language acquisition, potentially overlooking the role of innate cognitive
predispositions.
This becomes evident when considering cases where children rapidly acquire complex
grammatical structures without explicit environmental exposure.
Lack of Explanation for Individual Differences:
Behaviorism struggles to provide a comprehensive explanation for individual differences in
language acquisition and proficiency.
For example, the vast variability in language skills among individuals may not be fully
accounted for by behaviorist principles alone.
Difficulty Explaining Cognitive Development:
Behaviorism faces challenges in explaining the cognitive development associated with
language acquisition, including shifts in abstract thinking and problem-solving abilities.
The cognitive leaps observed in language development, such as the ability to understand
abstract concepts, are not easily explained solely through behaviorist mechanisms.
Dynamic Nature of Language Learning:
Critics argue that behaviorism may not adequately capture the dynamic, interactive nature
of language learning, which involves constant adaptation, abstraction, and internal
cognitive processes.
The dynamic nature becomes apparent when considering how individuals adapt their
language use based on context and new experiences
Example: Consider the concept of linguistic creativity, where speakers can generate an infinite
number of novel and contextually appropriate sentences. Behaviorism, with its emphasis on
learned behaviors and external reinforcement, may struggle to provide a satisfactory account of
how individuals can spontaneously create entirely new linguistic expressions without explicit
reinforcement or exposure. The ability to create novel and meaningful language constructions is
a hallmark of linguistic creativity and poses a challenge for behaviorist explanations.