The document discusses using situational judgement tests (SJTs) to predict job performance. It presents data showing that candidates who can correctly identify the worst answer choice on SJTs consistently underperform on the job compared to those who can identify the best or worst options. Specifically, an insurance salesperson study found those who identified the wrong answer scored 11% lower on sales targets, while a manager study found a 14% difference in performance ratings between those who did or did not identify the worst choice. The document concludes SJTs can improve predictions of on-the-job success by assessing a candidate's ability to discern ineffective responses.