This is a lab report I created in my Biology lab class at the University of Idaho. This piece of work shows that I am capable of conducting a scientific experiment and writing scientific lab reports.
This is a lab report I created in my Biology lab class at the University of Idaho. This piece of work shows that I am capable of conducting a scientific experiment and writing scientific lab reports.
An ecological pyramid is a graphical representation designed to show the biomass or bio-productivity at each trophic level in a given ecosystem. there are three types of pyramid- 1) Pyramid of number.2) Pyramid of biomass 3) Pyramid of energy.
All bats are special, but stenodermatines are more special than othersLiliana Davalos
Poster at the 5th International Berlin Bat Meeting February 2017. Original title: Illuminating the single shift in diversification rates across Chiroptera. Abstract: The great taxonomic richness and ecological diversity of bats suggests they are a classic adaptive radiation of the kind first outlined by G.G. Simpson. But analyses of diversification rates for both New World noctilionoids and all bats have identified only one large change in rates, corresponding to the first emergence of the phyllostomid subfamily Stenodermatinae. Hence one critical condition for adaptive radiation, the rapid emergence of many independent lineages, applies only to stenodermatines and to no other clade in the bat phylogeny. Here we compare traditional explanations for the evolution of so many species, focused on abiotic drivers of speciation, with biotic explanations. We find no association between Pleistocene glacial cycles and important changes in speciation rates among stenodermatines, or any other New World noctilionoids. Instead, the invasion of a trophic niche including figs inaccessible to other bats seems to be the critical factor leading to higher diversification rates through higher speciation rates or, less likely, lower extinction rates. At least two sets of stenodermatine genomic adaptations —in olfactory receptor genes and blue-light opsins— appear to be associated with this new trophic niche. Although the genomic basis of the novel skull architecture conferring the high bite force of stenodermatines is unknown, both phylogenetic and ontogenetic analyses suggest changes in skull elongation likely account for this trait. More genomic changes linked to the stenodermatine adaptive zone remain to be uncovered, and can be guided by comparative and ecological analyses.
Ecological Pyramids and The Transfer of Energy in EcosystemsSandip Kumar Sahoo
Environmental science Module 1 Topic. This PPT is not a work of mine and was provided by our college professor during our graduation, so I am not sure about the original author. The credit goes to the Original author.
Biology Essay
Wildlife Conservation and Biology Essay
Structure And Function Of Biology Essay
Synthetic Biology? Essay
Biology Lab Essay
Biology Reflection
Biology Major Essay
Why I Chose Biology
Evolutionary Biology Essay
Why I Chose To Study Biology
Biology Is The Science Of Life
Biology Admission Essay
Examples Of My Favourite Subject In Biology
Relationships and Interactions in Biology Essay
Biology Application Essay Sample
Biology Compare And Contrast Essay
Biology : A Career In The Career Of Biology
Biology And Modern Biology
Lactase Experiment
Biology Major Essay
An ecological pyramid is a graphical representation designed to show the biomass or bio-productivity at each trophic level in a given ecosystem. there are three types of pyramid- 1) Pyramid of number.2) Pyramid of biomass 3) Pyramid of energy.
All bats are special, but stenodermatines are more special than othersLiliana Davalos
Poster at the 5th International Berlin Bat Meeting February 2017. Original title: Illuminating the single shift in diversification rates across Chiroptera. Abstract: The great taxonomic richness and ecological diversity of bats suggests they are a classic adaptive radiation of the kind first outlined by G.G. Simpson. But analyses of diversification rates for both New World noctilionoids and all bats have identified only one large change in rates, corresponding to the first emergence of the phyllostomid subfamily Stenodermatinae. Hence one critical condition for adaptive radiation, the rapid emergence of many independent lineages, applies only to stenodermatines and to no other clade in the bat phylogeny. Here we compare traditional explanations for the evolution of so many species, focused on abiotic drivers of speciation, with biotic explanations. We find no association between Pleistocene glacial cycles and important changes in speciation rates among stenodermatines, or any other New World noctilionoids. Instead, the invasion of a trophic niche including figs inaccessible to other bats seems to be the critical factor leading to higher diversification rates through higher speciation rates or, less likely, lower extinction rates. At least two sets of stenodermatine genomic adaptations —in olfactory receptor genes and blue-light opsins— appear to be associated with this new trophic niche. Although the genomic basis of the novel skull architecture conferring the high bite force of stenodermatines is unknown, both phylogenetic and ontogenetic analyses suggest changes in skull elongation likely account for this trait. More genomic changes linked to the stenodermatine adaptive zone remain to be uncovered, and can be guided by comparative and ecological analyses.
Ecological Pyramids and The Transfer of Energy in EcosystemsSandip Kumar Sahoo
Environmental science Module 1 Topic. This PPT is not a work of mine and was provided by our college professor during our graduation, so I am not sure about the original author. The credit goes to the Original author.
Biology Essay
Wildlife Conservation and Biology Essay
Structure And Function Of Biology Essay
Synthetic Biology? Essay
Biology Lab Essay
Biology Reflection
Biology Major Essay
Why I Chose Biology
Evolutionary Biology Essay
Why I Chose To Study Biology
Biology Is The Science Of Life
Biology Admission Essay
Examples Of My Favourite Subject In Biology
Relationships and Interactions in Biology Essay
Biology Application Essay Sample
Biology Compare And Contrast Essay
Biology : A Career In The Career Of Biology
Biology And Modern Biology
Lactase Experiment
Biology Major Essay
Wetlands mainly encompass any land which is saturated or covered with water for all or throughout the year and doesn’t fall under into grassland, cropland, or forest land (Zedler et al. 2). As in the case of any other ecosystem, the overall carbon IV oxide and methane flux are due to the balance between the release of carbon by decomposition and carbon absorption from the atmosphere through photosynthesis. Both the rates of carbon absorption and decay losses are mainly influenced by nutrient, climate, water saturation, and oxygen availability (Inglett 1)
Nevertheless, aerobic conditions that are plenty in a large percentage of the upland ecosystems results to the releasing of carbon IV oxide (CO2) while methane (CH4) emissions remain prevalent in the anaerobic conditions. Furthermore, the establishment of the wetlands via flooding end up altering the pattern of the greenhouse gas production and emissions towards the greater CO2 emissions and CH4 emissions (Hong-Suk 13). Depending on the characteristics of the reservoir and the climate, both CH4 and CO2 can be released from the decaying of the submerged biomass as well as the general decomposition of the inundated of the dissolved organic materials and soil organic matter.
Genotype-By-Environment Interaction (VG X E) wth ExamplesZohaib HUSSAIN
Introduction
Phenotypic variation can be caused by the combination of genotypes and environments in a population. Genotypes are all equally sensitive to their environments, meaning that a change of environment would impact the phenotype of all genotypes to the same extent. In fact, genotypes very often have different degrees of sensitivity to environmental conditions. This cause of phenotypic variance is called genotype by- environment interaction and is symbolized by VG x E. This adds another term to the expression for the independent causes of total phenotypic variation in a population
Ve = VG + VE + VG xE
What Makes a Thing Living”Biology is the many-faceted study of.docxhelzerpatrina
What Makes a Thing “Living”?
Biology is the many-faceted study of living things. But what, exactly, is a living thing? Some of our definition comes directly from the work of Pasteur, Mendel, and others. Their work demonstrated that life can come only from other life. That means that all living things must reproduce. They pass genetic information on to their offspring—and all living things do this with DNA. This genetic information helps determine the physical structure of the offspring.
As Mendel and Morgan observed, an offspring’s physical structure can vary. This variation, sometimes called diversity, may have fortunate or unfortunate effects for the individual, but it helps the species survive. If a given population has numerous variations in its gene pool (all of the genes present in the population), the population is more likely to have at least some members that can survive an environmental change. Over time, these individual variations accumulate, reshaping the population in new ways. This is the nature of evolution. Because the species can only continue living via reproduction, the species is continuous over time.
Living things also detect and respond to stimuli. A stimulus is a change, event, or substance that causes an organism to act. In animals and human beings, stimuli can be detected with eyes, ears, nose, touch, or taste buds. For example, you step outside and feel drops of rain on your head. You go back inside and get an umbrella. The raindrops are the stimulus. They were detected by your sense of touch. You responded by getting an umbrella. Pain is another example of a stimulus. If you stub your toe, the pain causes you to move backward or flinch. Drugs, chemicals, and electricity can also be stimuli. The important factor is that stimuli provoke responses.
What else do all living things have in common? For every individual, from a bacterium to a blue whale, life begins and ends. In the stretch of time between those two phenomena, the living thing must, in essence, work to stay alive. Whether it feeds on insects or sunlight, every living thing must consume enough energy that its cells can carry out all their internal processes. These processes include building new cells for growth, removing dead cells and waste matter, helping the individual reproduce, and so forth. These processes are chemical; they depend on chemical reactions
that can take place only under certain circumstances. Therefore, a living thing’s body must maintain those circumstances. These circumstances are often called the life form’s internal environment. Maintaining that environment—in other words, working to live—is called homeostasis.
All living things do the following:
■ Reproduce.
■ Pass along their traits through DNA.
■ Consume energy sources and expel waste products to maintain homeostasis.
■ Respond to their environments.
■ Respond to stimulus.
■ Change over time.
■ Can differ as individuals while still being part of a species.
■ Consist of biomole ...
Is macroevolution simply “microevolution over very long periods of t.pdfarishmarketing21
Is macroevolution simply “microevolution over very long periods of time?” What processes or
events become very important at the macroevolutionary scale, where the fossil record gives
evidence of different species, genera, families, and higher taxa replacing others?
Solution
It is not macroevolution simply “microevolution over very long periods of time but
microevolution is leading to macroevolution and speciation over very long periods of time.
\"Gradualism and the primacy of natural selection followed by Speciation and genome
reorganization due to genetic drift\" are the processes or events that become very important at the
macroevolutionary scale, where the fossil record gives evidence of different species, genera,
families, and higher taxa replacing others. For example, micro-evolutionary changes that
accumulate within two organisms of opposite sex may cause macro-evolutionary changes in the
offspring produced by their mating. The offspring greatly varies genetically from their parents
and is special enough to result in speciation; this is called “macroevolution.”
In Darwin\'s theory, the microevolutionary changes observed in the phenotypic features of the
“finches”, beaks, tortoises and coral reefs that are observable during a scientist’s lifetime provide
support for Darwin’s view that all life is connected in a branching pattern of phylogenetic tree.
According to Darwin, natural selection including genetic variations is leading to “branching
pattern” in the origin of species. He concluded in his lifetime microevolutionay observation base
on gradualism of species evolution with “branching interrelationships” among all living beings
by meticulous “metaphor of branching pattern” as described below.
Darwin’s theory of gradualism and evolution:
Darwin uses Gradualsim and he proposed that the gradual changes associated with variations of a
species through evolution to get adapted to the present ecosystem with no much transitional
forms. Human evolution based on the gradualism and their adaptations are extremely complex.
Initially in the gradualism, natural selection operates to obtain specific traits according to biome,
ecosystem because of large-scale events followed by formation of rivers, water availability and
habitat formation. Humans did not evolve from primates until just 7 million years ago; while life
appeared on earth 3.5 billion years ago. Humans are well adapted for the environment and
developed their adaptation features as per interspecific and intraspecific genetic variations. If the
evolution time-line compressed to a calendar year, the first organism would appear around
March and Humans would not appear until December 31.
Darwin has developed a meticulous scientific theory about the exact biological evolution of a
species and he explained the evolution of modern species over a long period from a common
ancestor base on morphological convergent & divergent features as explained below.
Descent with modification from a common ance.
1. Analysis of Multiple Species Presence on Diatom Motility
S.A. Cohn, K. Patterson, A. Wolske;
Biological Sciences, DePaul Univ, Chicago, IL
Diatoms, like other algae, ordinarily live within complex multi-species algal communities.
Diatoms are crucial components in these aquatic communities, providing one of the most
abundant primary food sources. In order to help manage the development of healthy
aquatic ecosystems it is important to understand the ecological stimuli that regulate the
ability of motile diatoms to successfully migrate through their local assemblages in order to
successfully exploit resources such as light and nutrients. Our lab has shown how several
large single-celled diatom species display characteristic responses to local conditions such as
temperature and light. We have also showed how several of these conditions such as
adhesion and directional responses can often be modified in the presence of other diatom
species. We have investigated this further to show that this effect can be dependent on the
relative abundance of diatom species present. For example, when exposed to high blue light
irradiations at their leading tip, Stauroneis cells (S. phoenicenteron) will reverse direction in
about 43±4 s. However, in the presence of Craticula cells (C. cuspidata) the direction change
increases in a concentration dependent manner, increasing to 172±39 s when the
Craticula:Stauroneis ratio is 10:1 (same approximate cell density for all experiments). This
type of effect can be generated quickly, and appears to be rapidly reversible. In a separate
experiment, Stauroneis cells alone reversed direction upon blue light irradiation in 34±3 s,
but when these cells were exposed to a large number of Craticula cells this response time
increased to 42±2 sec within just a few minutes of exposure. Upon removal from the
Craticula cells and rinsing in fresh medium, the cells returned to their initial response time of
35±3 sec. In both cases the direction change response of the Craticula cells seems
unaffected by the presence of Stauroneis. We are investigating such species-dependent
modulations of motile characteristics to better understand the ways in which species can
affect each other's motility and might be able to undertake resource partitioning within a
complex algal assemblage to gain even more ecological advantage. This work was
supported by grants through the DePaul College of Science and Health, the DePaul
University Research Council, and equipment purchased previously through NSF Grant IBN-
9982897.