Foxconn is Apple's largest manufacturing partner. It operates 13 factories in China employing over 200,000 workers who often work 60 hours per week for $100 per month and live in company dorms. Foxconn and Apple have faced criticism for labor abuses like child labor, poor working conditions leading to employee suicides, and lack of safety precautions when using toxic chemicals. While these practices may be common in China, companies need to ensure their suppliers meet basic ethical standards to avoid negative publicity from competitors and activists exposing such unsavory practices.

1. Business Ethics
Apple

2. Team Leader
Hammad Baloch

3. Introduction
• Apple Inc. is an American multinational corporation, that
designs, develops, and sells consumer electronics, computer
software and personal computers. Its best-known hardware
products are the Mac line of computers.
• Apple was founded by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald
Wayne on April 1, 1976 .
• Apple is the world's second-largest information technology
company by revenue after Samsung Electronics, and the
world's third-largest mobile phone maker after Samsung and
Nokia.

4. Foxconn
• Foxconn Technology Group, is a Taiwanese multinational
electronics contract manufacturing company, It is the world's
largest electronics contract manufacturer, and the fourth-
largest information technology company by revenue.
• Foxconn has 13 factories in nine Chinese cities.
• Notable products that the company manufactures include the
BlackBerry,iPad , iPhone, iPod, Kindle, Xbox One, Xbox 360,
PlayStation 3 and PlayStation 4.

5. Un Ethical practices
• over 200,000workers that lived and
worked in the factory, 60 hours of
labor per week they made around
$100 per month and were required
to live on the premises and pay for
rent and food from the company.
• Foxconn & Apple's child labor
abuses.
• Suicides of employees and labour.
• Suicide proof building ,preventing
nets.
• Usage of poison and toxic
chemical without any safety
precautions.

7. Conclusion
• Too often companies take a blind eye to their
suppliers and act like practices that are common in a
region don't apply to them or these favored suppliers,
even though they may know this isn't true. In an
Internet age, I think that is increasingly problematic.
Even if governments don't take action, competitors
and activist groups are more than capable of making
these unsavory practices visible.

8. iQUIT