SCREENING MODELS FOR ANTI MICROBIAL
ACTIVITY
1
 An antimicrobial is an agent kills m.o’s or inhibits their
growth
 Antimicrobial medicines can be grouped according to the
m.o’s they act primarily against- antibiotics are used to
against bacteria and antifungal against fungi
 Anti bacterial used to treat bacterial infections, toxicity to
humans and other animals from antibacterial is generally
considered low
2
ANTIBACTERIAL SCREENING MODELS
 MOUSE SYSTEMIC INFECTION MODEL
 RABBIT SKIN BURN INFECTION MODEL
 MOUSE ASCENDING URINARY TRACT INFECTION
MODEL
3
MOUSE SYSTEMIC INFECTION MODEL
PRINCIPLE:
o The in vivo efficacy of test against mouse systemic infections was
determined with strains of E.coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae,S.aureus.
o Test showed broad –spectrum in vivo activity in the MSI model
4
REQUIREMENTS:
 Animal :CD-11 CR mice (18-21g)/ 10 mice per gp,5 males
&5 females
 S.c inj 0.5ml 5% mucin
 Diff.doses of test& ref.cpds
5
PROCEDURE :
• 18-21 g of mice were selected randomly 7 distributed into 21
groups with 5 gps for each cpd and 1 control
• Mice were I.P infected with 0.5ml of a bacterial suspension in 5%
mucin
• Diff.doses of test & reference cpds (saline for the control)were
administerd S.C 15min& 6h after infection, respectively
• Doses of test were 0.32-1.59mg/kg for E.coli infections, 0.1-
0.5mg/kg for K.pneumoniae, 0.16-2.5mg/kg forS.aureus
6
OBSERVATION:
• Deaths in each gp ED50 & 95% confidence limits were determined
RESULT :
o In general, test showed broad spectrum activity against
gram –ve and +ve bacteria
7
RABBIT SKIN BURN INFECTION MODEL
PRINCIPLE :
 The skin burn infection study was carried out with 6 male New
Zealand White rabbits infected with bact.suspension
REQUIREMENTS :
 Animal : new Zealand white rabbits (6 male) / 2.5-3kg
 Challenge dose, 1 x 107 CFU/burn wound
 Barium sulfide ZnO Starch paste
 Anesthesia : pentoibarbital Na (30mg/kg of B.W)
 75% et-OH
8
PROCEDURE :
 6 male white rabbits infected with E.coli
 one day before infection, the back hair of the animals was clipped
and then removed by applying a paste of BaSO4-ZnO starch (2:3:3
wt/wt/wt)
 On the day of infection ,the rabbits were anesthetized by IV inj.of
pentobarbital Na (30mg/kg of BW) and the back skin of the
animals were sterilized with 75% ET-oh.
 7 deep 2nd degree burn wounds ( 6 for admin.cpds and 1 for
control)were then created on the back of each animal by applying a
brass probe (dia 1.8cm , heated to 100°C for 10s
9
 15 min later 0.1ml (challenging dose 1x10⁷CFU/burn wound) of
an E.coli suspension in saline was I.C injected into each wound%&
home made cap used for protecting the wound
 1 hr after the burning 0.4ml of diff.cpd soln or saline (for the
control) was administered to the corresponding wound by loading it
onto a sterile gauze patch of the same size as the burn wound
 Sterile petrolactum contain gauze was used on top of the cpd
containing gauze to keep the wound humid
 The rabbits were sacrificed24 h after admin. of the cpds .
10
OBSERVATION :
 Full thickness skin biopsy samples were taken from the center of
the burns sterility and homogenized in saline
 the homogenates were serially 10 fold diluted &0.1ml aliquots were
spread onto nutrient agar plates
 The plates were incubated at 35°c for 48h, and no. of viable
organism in the burn wounds were determined
EVALUATION
 Test cpds which reduce the viable colony counts is compared to
that of the control group
11
MOUSE ASCENDING UTI MODEL
PRINCIPLE :
 The therapeutic efficacy of test drugs in mouse ascending UTI
caused by E.Coli bact.suspension was evaluated with female CD-11
CR mice. Test drugs exhibited a high degree of dose dependent
efficacy against bacterial suspension
REQUIREMENTS:
 Animal : CD-11CR mice ( 20-22g 10 mice /gp F)
 challenge dose, 2.2 x109 CFU/mouse
 Test cpds
 Anesthesia ; pentobarbital Na 0.05ml
12
 Saline & test cpds were admin, SC at 6,24,30,48 & 54h post
infection.
 Mice were sacrificed 72 h after infection
 PROCEDURE :
 Female mice of 20-220gm body weight were selected randomly and
grouped into 10mice /gp
 5 diff.doses of tests were used
 The mice were subjected to water restriction for 24 hrs prior to &
after infection
13
 Under anesthesia a round point needle was inserted trans urethrally
for inj.0.05ml of the bacterial suspension in 5% mucin into the
bladder
 Urethral needle was removed immediately after inoculation &
external urethral meatus clamped for 1 h
14
15
OBSERVATION:
 Kidneys were removed and homogenized in saline , the
homogenates serially diluted 10-fold diluted , & 0.1 ml aliquots were
spread onto agar plates
 Plates were incubated at 35◦c for 48h & no. of viable organism in
the kidney (CFU/ gm) were determined
EVALUATION
 Test cpds which reduce no. of viable organism in the kidney is
compared to that of the control group
16
THANK YOU.......

anti microbial screening models

  • 1.
    SCREENING MODELS FORANTI MICROBIAL ACTIVITY 1
  • 2.
     An antimicrobialis an agent kills m.o’s or inhibits their growth  Antimicrobial medicines can be grouped according to the m.o’s they act primarily against- antibiotics are used to against bacteria and antifungal against fungi  Anti bacterial used to treat bacterial infections, toxicity to humans and other animals from antibacterial is generally considered low 2
  • 3.
    ANTIBACTERIAL SCREENING MODELS MOUSE SYSTEMIC INFECTION MODEL  RABBIT SKIN BURN INFECTION MODEL  MOUSE ASCENDING URINARY TRACT INFECTION MODEL 3
  • 4.
    MOUSE SYSTEMIC INFECTIONMODEL PRINCIPLE: o The in vivo efficacy of test against mouse systemic infections was determined with strains of E.coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae,S.aureus. o Test showed broad –spectrum in vivo activity in the MSI model 4
  • 5.
    REQUIREMENTS:  Animal :CD-11CR mice (18-21g)/ 10 mice per gp,5 males &5 females  S.c inj 0.5ml 5% mucin  Diff.doses of test& ref.cpds 5
  • 6.
    PROCEDURE : • 18-21g of mice were selected randomly 7 distributed into 21 groups with 5 gps for each cpd and 1 control • Mice were I.P infected with 0.5ml of a bacterial suspension in 5% mucin • Diff.doses of test & reference cpds (saline for the control)were administerd S.C 15min& 6h after infection, respectively • Doses of test were 0.32-1.59mg/kg for E.coli infections, 0.1- 0.5mg/kg for K.pneumoniae, 0.16-2.5mg/kg forS.aureus 6
  • 7.
    OBSERVATION: • Deaths ineach gp ED50 & 95% confidence limits were determined RESULT : o In general, test showed broad spectrum activity against gram –ve and +ve bacteria 7
  • 8.
    RABBIT SKIN BURNINFECTION MODEL PRINCIPLE :  The skin burn infection study was carried out with 6 male New Zealand White rabbits infected with bact.suspension REQUIREMENTS :  Animal : new Zealand white rabbits (6 male) / 2.5-3kg  Challenge dose, 1 x 107 CFU/burn wound  Barium sulfide ZnO Starch paste  Anesthesia : pentoibarbital Na (30mg/kg of B.W)  75% et-OH 8
  • 9.
    PROCEDURE :  6male white rabbits infected with E.coli  one day before infection, the back hair of the animals was clipped and then removed by applying a paste of BaSO4-ZnO starch (2:3:3 wt/wt/wt)  On the day of infection ,the rabbits were anesthetized by IV inj.of pentobarbital Na (30mg/kg of BW) and the back skin of the animals were sterilized with 75% ET-oh.  7 deep 2nd degree burn wounds ( 6 for admin.cpds and 1 for control)were then created on the back of each animal by applying a brass probe (dia 1.8cm , heated to 100°C for 10s 9
  • 10.
     15 minlater 0.1ml (challenging dose 1x10⁷CFU/burn wound) of an E.coli suspension in saline was I.C injected into each wound%& home made cap used for protecting the wound  1 hr after the burning 0.4ml of diff.cpd soln or saline (for the control) was administered to the corresponding wound by loading it onto a sterile gauze patch of the same size as the burn wound  Sterile petrolactum contain gauze was used on top of the cpd containing gauze to keep the wound humid  The rabbits were sacrificed24 h after admin. of the cpds . 10
  • 11.
    OBSERVATION :  Fullthickness skin biopsy samples were taken from the center of the burns sterility and homogenized in saline  the homogenates were serially 10 fold diluted &0.1ml aliquots were spread onto nutrient agar plates  The plates were incubated at 35°c for 48h, and no. of viable organism in the burn wounds were determined EVALUATION  Test cpds which reduce the viable colony counts is compared to that of the control group 11
  • 12.
    MOUSE ASCENDING UTIMODEL PRINCIPLE :  The therapeutic efficacy of test drugs in mouse ascending UTI caused by E.Coli bact.suspension was evaluated with female CD-11 CR mice. Test drugs exhibited a high degree of dose dependent efficacy against bacterial suspension REQUIREMENTS:  Animal : CD-11CR mice ( 20-22g 10 mice /gp F)  challenge dose, 2.2 x109 CFU/mouse  Test cpds  Anesthesia ; pentobarbital Na 0.05ml 12
  • 13.
     Saline &test cpds were admin, SC at 6,24,30,48 & 54h post infection.  Mice were sacrificed 72 h after infection  PROCEDURE :  Female mice of 20-220gm body weight were selected randomly and grouped into 10mice /gp  5 diff.doses of tests were used  The mice were subjected to water restriction for 24 hrs prior to & after infection 13
  • 14.
     Under anesthesiaa round point needle was inserted trans urethrally for inj.0.05ml of the bacterial suspension in 5% mucin into the bladder  Urethral needle was removed immediately after inoculation & external urethral meatus clamped for 1 h 14
  • 15.
    15 OBSERVATION:  Kidneys wereremoved and homogenized in saline , the homogenates serially diluted 10-fold diluted , & 0.1 ml aliquots were spread onto agar plates  Plates were incubated at 35◦c for 48h & no. of viable organism in the kidney (CFU/ gm) were determined EVALUATION  Test cpds which reduce no. of viable organism in the kidney is compared to that of the control group
  • 16.