The animatic narrative makes sense but lacks flow, making it less engaging. It is difficult to see how visual effects will integrate due to lack of story context. The dialogue makes sense but does not flow smoothly, with some breaks and pauses. All shots are longer than needed. Technical quality of the animatic could be improved by emphasizing visual effects in editing software. When filming, the sequence could be improved by addressing errors identified in feedback.

1. ANIMATIC PEER FEEDBACK
DOES IT MAKE NARRATIVE SENSE?
The narrative does make sense however, there is not a
narrative flow. This leaves the film with a less engaging
feeling.
IS IT EASY TO SEE HOW THE SPECIAL FX
WILL FIT IN?
From the animatic sequence it is not easy to see how the
VFX will fit in. This maybe due to not knowing the original
story.
IS THE DIALOGUE ENGAGING?
The dialogue, although it makes sense doesn't flow
smoothly and therefore has a few breaks and pauses.
WHICH SHOTS DO THINK LAST TOO LONG?
All the shots are longer than they need to be. This could be
changed when filming.
HOW COULD THE SEQUENCE BE IMPROVED?
When filming the actual footage, these errors could be
taken into consideration.
HOW COULD THE TECHNICAL QUALITY OF
THE ANIMATIC BE IMPROVED?
The animatic quality could be improved in the technical
circumstances as emphasising the VFX in Premier.