animal rights

•

11 likes•3,415 views

Christians have differing views on animal rights. Some believe humans can use animals for food and experiments as God gave humans dominion over animals. Others argue animals have rights as God's creatures and humans should show kindness to all. Muslims believe humans should not be cruel to animals and those used for food must be slaughtered humanely. They also believe animals can be used for food and medical experiments that help humankind, as the Quran teaches animals are part of God's creation.

ANIMAL RIGHTS Religious viewpoints Christianity and Muslim

CHRISTIANITY ,[object Object],[object Object]

HOWEVER… ,[object Object],[object Object]

They think this because… ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Other Christians are opposed to …. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

MUSLIMS BELIEVE … ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

THEY BELIEVE THIS BECAUSE… ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What's hot

Animal cruelty presentation for officers

Joan Bundy Law

Animal cruelty

DeeDee040905

Do animals have rights

FEDERAL UNIVERSITY, OYE EKITI

Spc2023 animal rights informative speech presentationBrooke Johnson

animal testingguestbee33a

Animal rights

manisha mahajan

Animal ethics: a social controversy

Andrew Knight

Animal abuse power point

acdurr

Animal cruelty by omar flores

Cruelty to animals

Animal welfare

Animal testing

ANIMAL ABUSE

Animal ethics

Subramani Parasuraman

Animal Testing Powerpointguest2389f46

Stop Animal Abuse

Swestern

SUSTAINABILITY: ANIMAL WELFARE

George Dumitrache

Animal abuse in BANGLADESH

Zahid Shuvo

Animal Testing powerpoint

Kristen McLaughlin

The Animal Welfare ActHVCClibrary

What's hot (20)

Animal cruelty presentation for officers

Animal cruelty

Do animals have rights

Spc2023 animal rights informative speech presentation

animal testing

Animal rights

Animal ethics: a social controversy

Animal abuse power point

Animal cruelty by omar flores

Cruelty to animals

Animal welfare

Animal testing

ANIMAL ABUSE

Animal ethics

Animal Testing Powerpoint

Stop Animal Abuse

SUSTAINABILITY: ANIMAL WELFARE

Animal abuse in BANGLADESH

Animal Testing powerpoint

The Animal Welfare Act

Viewers also liked

DevocalizationAll Animal Rights

Animal Rights - Is the Treatment of Animals Improving?HVCClibrary

Animal Rights FAQAll Animal Rights

Presentation animal rights ENGLISH

emilyfaithdel

Animal Communication

Haley Boyan

Animal Communication

Lê Hòa

Animal & human language ppt.

Aneeka Kazmi

Second language acquisitionRaul Vargas

Second language acquisition

Karen R. Suárez

Theories of second language acquisitiondeera zahrin

Second Language Acquisition 631Maria Ivette Ortiz Rosado

Second Language Acquisition: An IntroductionJane Keeler

Language: Definition, Nature, and Characteristics

Ma Elena Oblino Abainza

Human Language vs Animal CommunicationAndrea Di Cuonzo

Animal communication and human languageJasmine Wong

second language acquisition

Vui Nguyen

Animal communicationdamarisb

Viewers also liked (17)

Devocalization

Animal Rights - Is the Treatment of Animals Improving?

Animal Rights FAQ

Presentation animal rights ENGLISH

Animal Communication

Animal & human language ppt.

Second language acquisition

Theories of second language acquisition

Second Language Acquisition 631

Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction

Language: Definition, Nature, and Characteristics

Human Language vs Animal Communication

Animal communication and human language

second language acquisition

Animal communication

Similar to animal rights

Religion and animals

Animal experiments

Animal experiments

Vegetarianism

Eating non veg permitted or prohibitted

Mohammed Umair

Animal Rights Essay

Help Me Write My Essay Cambridge

Argumentative Essay On Animal Rights Argument for Animal Rights Essay The Violation Of Animal Rights My Views on Animal Rights Persuasive Speech On Animal Rights The Issue Of Animal Rights Essay Essay on Nonhuman Animal Rights Animal Rights Essay Animal Rights And Human Rights Animal Rights and Ethics Essay Animal Rights Essay animal rights Essay Essay on Animal Rights Essay on Zoos and Animal Rights Animal Rights Thesis Animal Rights: An Example Of Socialism Animal Rights Essay Animal Rights The Evil Of Animal Rights Essay Essay on ANIMAL RIGHTS

Surname 1NameInstructorCourseDateEthics of Eating Meat.docx

mattinsonjanel

Surname 1 Name Instructor Course Date Ethics of Eating Meat The world has evolved across various angles and over time. In fact, the notion of evolution could be pointed towards a course that dictates a change of heart or ideas. In most instances, it is not just the environment around us that changes, people also adapt to change. It is evident from the different types of people that we are able to meet on a daily basis. In such evolution of ideas and development, people have a tendency to develop unique persuasions or even motivations. There are those who have an inclination towards furthering certain ideals. Such orientations define the various agitations that people have sought to further and advance. On one end, we have seen sexual health agitators who argue and advocate for sexual liberalism. One of the most powerful upcoming agitation agendas is the need to agitate for ethical behavior in our eating habits. The aspect that seems to be holding a lot of sway in this whole endeavor is the notion of eating meat. There are two groups pitted against each other arguing for and against the merits of consumption of meat. This paper emphasizes on this aspect and seeks to interrogate the ethical notions behind eating meat. There will also be a discussion on the religious angle that has also, to some extent, sought to fuel the debate. Meat is acquired from animals that have to be slaughtered for the objective to be achieved. The act of slaughtering these animals means that death is an inevitable consequence of meat eating. Most people cannot bring themselves to reconcile with the fact that meat eating seems to indirectly glorify the random killing of animals for human gratification. It is on this basis that this group of people has established that there is no ethical basis for engaging in the consumption of meat (Lusk and Norwood 109). It presents one face of the argument, merely on the face of it. According to Sachin Maharaja (n.p), a healthy eating advocate that seeks to advance a cause against the eating of meat by humans, there should be a justification behind the act of eating meat acquired through cruelty to animals. It is importation to appreciate that cruelty in this case is subjective given that it is a personal opinion expressed by the advocate. Sachin (n.p) asserts that humans should be in a position to justify their actions of consuming meat without having to advance or base their argument on the natural order or cause of things (Sachin, n.p). Satin argues that humans derive so much pleasure from the act of consuming meat. The lingering question that should then follow after such disposition is whether such pleasure should be derived from as painful a process as that which the animals have to undergo for the meat to be acquired. Does the pain and torture that animals undergo during slaughter justify the joy derived from the consumption of such products thereafter? (Kristof, n.p) The argument by Nicholas Kristof in the New York ...

Unit 7 Medical Ethics Overviewsemmerson

Vegetarianism

Avinash Nadig

Q6 non vegsaud777

The Ethical OmnivoreJulia Southerland

A Religious Argument For Vegetarianism

Screaming Chicken

Yoga & the roots of vegetarianism 3pgsMarcus Vannini

Student’s Last Name 1Banning Halal; Act of Aggression towards .docx

hanneloremccaffery

Student’s Last Name 1 Banning Halal; Act of Aggression towards Islamic religion “Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which has been invoked the name of other than Allah; that which hath been killed by strangling, or by a violent blow,” (Surat Al Maidah, Quran, 5:3).In the Islamic faith, the things someone is allowed to do and those one is not allowed to do are clearly stated and have not been altered for the last 1435 years. The term “Halal” translates to ‘allow’ in Arabic. Most people associate the Islamic term “Halal” with the food recommended for consumption but also the term has a broader meaning; it stands for all things a Muslim is allowed to engage in by the Islamic religion. The opposite of Halal is Haram that is the things that one is not allowed to engage in. In recent times, there has been debate as to whether ‘Halal’ mode of killing animals should be banned or maintained. This is a controversial issue mostly in European nations and different verdicts have been arrived at by different countries. Countries that have banned or proposed the banning of Halal mode of meat preparation have shown discriminatory characteristics. The fact that we live in a global village provides that there be no space for anti-tolerance sentiments. By banning “Halal” meat preparation, the government is asking people to choose between secular laws and Islamic laws which is equal to asking them to denounce their faith. As well, it is a sign of disrespect for doctrines of a religion that has existed for thousands of years, banning Halal is seen as form of Islamphobia. On the other hand, activists for the ban claim that Halal way of preparing meat is inhumane and that is why it should be banned and replaced with other modern methods. Although most nations are banning Halal Meat preparation or thinking of it, Halal method of preparing meat should not be banned because it goes against a fundamental right of people to practice their religious rights. First, governments who ban Halal mode of slaughtering are asking a person to choose secular laws over religious laws which is equivalent to asking them to denounce their faith. Banning of Halal mode of slaughtering animals which is the only way a Muslim is allowed to eat any kind of meat is going to be detrimental to the followers of the Islamic faith because the Quran explicitly forbids eating of any meat prepared in any other way apart from the Halal way. According to Sharia law, a Muslim before eating any kind of food especially meat must have undergone specific rituals of preparing it. The method used to slaughter is referred to as Dhabi bah. In this method, a very sharp knife is used to cut an animal’s throat. The sharp knife is meant to ensure that an animal suffers the least amount of pain as it takes only one swift stroke to cut its neck during the process. Food to be eaten by a Muslim must be prepared by a Muslim who uses Halal ways of slaughtering his animals.

Similar to animal rights (14)

Religion and animals

Animal experiments

Vegetarianism

Eating non veg permitted or prohibitted

Animal Rights Essay

Surname 1NameInstructorCourseDateEthics of Eating Meat.docx

Unit 7 Medical Ethics Overview

Vegetarianism

Q6 non veg

The Ethical Omnivore

A Religious Argument For Vegetarianism

Yoga & the roots of vegetarianism 3pgs

Student’s Last Name 1Banning Halal; Act of Aggression towards .docx

animal rights

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (17)

Similar to animal rights

Similar to animal rights (14)

More from nola

More from nola (17)

animal rights