Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Â
An Essay On The Short Documentary Ten Meter Tower
1. Hopptornet
!
!
Maximilien Van Aertryckâs and Alex Danielsonâs Hopptornet (2016) is a short documentary
that represents human behaviour while trying to overcome humanâs most cautious impulses.
The authors paid 67 people $30 to climb to the top of a ten meter diving tower in an indoor
swimming pool for their very first time. From there, the participants had to face a dilemma:
they could either dive or climb down. Only a selection of the recordings is shown in the film.
This documentary is, in the words of its directors, âsomething of a psychology experimentâ,
where the attempt is to âportray human behaviour, rather than tell our own stories about itâ.
The documentary took place in Sweden, and the subjects represented are Swedish, although
the directors claim that their movie elucidates something essentially human, transcending
culture and origins. The situation in which the authors put the participants was, according to
them, powerful enough not to need any classic narrative framework.
The art historian Adrian Strokes (1955), introduced the concepts of âmodellingâ and âcarvingâ
to describe the artistsâ perception of their own role. When âcarvingâ, the artist supposes
suggests that the block of stone contains within itself the form invented for it by nature. In
this case, the role of the artist is to liberate that form, to simply disclose the truth. When
âmodellingâ, the artist gives the raw stone his or her own truth, or what he claims as such.
When adopting a modelling attitude, the documentarist is thus aware of shaping the
situation in the representation.
In the case of Hopptornet, the documentaristsâ claims highlight that the they perceive their
own roles as âcarversâ: Indeed they claim to represent human behaviour ârather than telling
their own stories about itâ. In my essay, I will evaluate whether the authors succeed in their
achievement their purpose makes them succeed in trying to carve and show an intrinsic
truth. I will discuss mainly two of the decisions that the directors employed: the lack of
narrativity, and the situation of crisis.
Lack of narrativity
Hayden White claims that âwhere an account of narrativity is present, we can be sure that
morality or a moralising impulse is present tooâ (1980, p. 27). In order to give the viewer an
idea of unmediated access to the situation, Hopptornet lacks any narrative framework. Three
2. focalisers, fixed cameras that do not necessarily imply the presence of anyone behind them,
are alternated in the recording of the various scenes: a frontal focaliser framing the tower, a
side focaliser giving the viewer an idea of the height, and another frontal zoomed-in view.
Once a scene starts, usually when someone is reaching the tower or has just reached the
tower, the whole doubt-process is reproduced entirely, uncut and rough. It is, to put it in
Robert Drewâs words, a representation âwithout summary and opinionâ. This sense of realism
include intervals of scenes edited in slow-motion, which draw attention to the body
movements and to the expressions of some participants who are diving. In these situations,
the viewers may instantly become more aware of the editing â and therefore of the presence -
of documentarists. Another reflexive choice that draws attention on the constructedness of
the situation is the presence of the microphone in the frame.
There is no commentary voice, the scenes are presented in the way of a historical
chronicle, not imposing upon the processes the form that we normally associate with
storytelling (White, 1980, p. 12). Even the last scene, when a professional diver jumps down
on the notes of Beethovenâs An die Freude, does not seem to immediately convey any sort of
specific and clear moral closure; it rather suggests an open interpretation. Until the very last
scene, there are no sounds apart from the heavy, typical background noise of the swimming
pool, which conveys a feeling of realism and presentness, the splashs of the divers, and the
comments of the participants on the tower and on the side of the pool.
However, White argues that even in chronicles there must be a story since there is
surely a plot (1980, p. 18), and the plot is given both by what was kept to be part of a whole,
and what was left out as not fitting in the whole. The film is indeed constructed also on the
basis of a set of events which might have been included but were left out; therefore the lack of
narrativity does not entirely solve the problem of authority.
Individuals as symbols
Bill Nichols defines a documentary as a film âmaking an argument about the historical
worldâ, whereas Carl Plantinga reshapes the definition in term of âmaking an assertion of
truthâ (Dirk, 1995, p. 83). To me, Hopptornet seems to fall better under Plantingaâs
definition. Indeed, the filmmakers are focused on showing a universal trait in human
behaviour: they assume that what they want to represent is simply intrinsic of every human,
everywhere, and at any time. It only has to be triggered and highlighted by the authors, who
are looking for a universal truth to show, rather than for a historical one.
5. relationship between crisis and camera may be reversed. The camera, instead of being
forgotten, may on the contrary increase the social pressure.
Conclusions
After acknowledging some ethical issues about the authorsâ choices, we are left with the
necessary question revolving around trust. As I have shown, there is still a problem of
authority in regard to the selection of the footage to include; this may affect the way the
individuals are taken as symboles for humanity; and the presence of the cameras may actually
affect how the actors behave during the crisis.
Can we thus say that Hopptornet is truthful in âcarvingâ some universally human traits,
as claimed by the directors? I argue that, regardless of the issues pointed out, the
documentary has a truth value in two respects.
Firstly, it shows some undoubtedly spontaneous behaviour, and because of this, the
film brings the viewer to identify with the participantsâ feelings. For example, in the scene
representing the man and the woman, at some point the man touches his knees. The woman
does it too, in such a quick way that cannot be anything but an impulsive reaction, due to her
empathy. The viewer, in similar cases, starts to feel empathetic to the participants, too. This
is also the reason that makes the film so entertaining for many people, which is perhaps also
the reason why also reality shows are so entertaining.
Secondly and more importantly, it is possible to find a carved up common thread
across all the scenes, regardless of the participantsâ reactions, dynamics, words, or final
decisions. The thread does not look scripted, nor influenced by the directors, but indeed only
triggered and highlighted by them. Here is the thread: in the first scene, when the young
man is determined to dive, his body remains wobbling on the edge of the tower for a few
moments. âItâs impossibleâ, he says, and he gives up. In the second scene, the man tells that
as soon as he has decided to go, his knees have abandoned him. The third scene starts with a fairly
old woman with her hands on her knees; she keeps moving back and forth and touching her
knees until she closes her eyes and dives. In the fourth scene, also one of the two men bends
on his knees before diving. So far, what is common is that they all look weak in their knees as
soon as they decide to go. In the same scene, the other man says, significantly: âMy heart says
noâ. In the sixth scene, a young woman boosts herself by patting her own legs, saying âGo,
girl!â. The thread seems to me the idea of a mind-body challenge when facing dilemmas
concerning your own survival, in which some cautious impulses are stimulated and clash with
6. rationality. The film conveys the feeling that, even when you have made a rational choice,
your body still tries to sabotage you. Is it really a universal truth? We cannot be sure about it,
since a documentary, as every representation of reality, is always exploitative and
manipulative to a degree. However, Hopptornet manages to show a spontaneous pattern across
genders, ages, final choices and processes of thoughts. For this reason, I argue that it actually
carves up some intrinsic truth and the directors succeed in their purpose.