Al-Qaeda was founded by Osama bin Laden in 1988 after fighting with Arab comrades against the Soviets in Afghanistan. Originally, its main goals were to help Pakistanis fight Iran for control of Afghanistan after the Soviets left, and to prevent oil and gas pipelines from Central Asia from reaching India and reducing Arab exports. Over time, Al-Qaeda took on additional goals of fighting Western influence across Africa and Asia to protect the Islamic oil cartel, while also engaging in internal conflicts within that cartel. It has received funding from Saudi donors but cooperation from Iran at times due to their overlapping interests in places like Africa and Central Asia.
A brief summary of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, of the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, and how these historic events were related to terrorism, and more specifically to Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State.
The Afghan Oil Pipeline and the US Negotiations with the Talibaniakovosal
This document summarizes negotiations between the US and the Taliban in the 1990s regarding proposed oil and gas pipelines from Central Asia through Afghanistan. It discusses how the pipelines could benefit both countries economically but were opposed by Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Al Qaeda. The US offered diplomatic recognition of the Taliban in exchange for allowing pipeline construction, but talks broke down after Al Qaeda's 1998 embassy bombings in Africa. Negotiations continued under President Bush but were ultimately derailed by the 9/11 attacks. The document reveals that Al Qaeda closely monitored the pipeline negotiations and sought to sabotage them to maintain its alliance with the Taliban.
Pakistan found itself allied with both the U.S. and the Afghan Taliban after the U.S. overthrew the Taliban government in 2001. Pakistan received substantial military aid from the U.S. but also created and supported the Afghan Taliban to fight Pakistan's enemies in Afghanistan. This left Pakistan trying to please both allies through a contradictory policy of supporting the U.S. against al-Qaeda while also maintaining ties to the Taliban and indirectly to al-Qaeda. Pakistan faced pressure from the U.S. to crack down on militants but attacking al-Qaeda or the Taliban threatened relations with Arab allies and Pakistani groups allied with them.
Haji Sahib Rohullah Wakil is assessedto pose a high risk threat. He is a 45-year-old Afghan citizen and important politician from Konar Province who provided operational support to al-Qaida. Detainee assisted Arabs associated with al-Qaida to infiltrate and exfiltrate from Afghanistan and Pakistan after the fall of the Taliban regime. He also worked with anti-Afghan government factions and Pakistani intelligence to destabilize the interim Afghan administration. Detainee remains a threat due to his past involvement with al-Qaida, support for insurgent groups, and efforts to undermine the Afghan government.
1) There were many problems in the relationship between Iran and Libya's Qaddafi in the years leading up to the 2011 Arab Spring, including disagreements over nuclear cooperation with France and support for opposing sides in conflicts in Lebanon, Sudan, and against Al Qaeda.
2) Iran played a role in supporting anti-Qaddafi forces during the Libyan Arab Spring through its allies Sudan and Hezbollah, who were among the first on the ground assisting rebels.
3) France's decision to intervene militarily against Qaddafi was driven partly by fears that Iranian or Turkish influence could grow in post-Qaddafi Libya if they did not act.
The document discusses the origins and geopolitics of ISIS. It notes that ISIS emerged from former members of Saddam Hussein's government after the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. It analyzes ISIS' relationships with neighboring countries including hostility with Iran and Syria but friendlier relations with Turkey and Jordan. The document also examines ISIS' goals of establishing control over Sunni regions and its options for gaining sponsors to further its agenda.
An armed conflict concerns government and/or territory where the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, results in battle-related death
1948 war over Kashmir
1965 India-Pakistan war
1971 India-Pakistan and Fall of Dhaka
Siachen Dispute and Sir creek
Kargil conflict 99
Saddam Hussein : The Father of ISIS in Iraqiakovosal
1) In the 1970s, Saddam Hussein and Hafez al-Assad of Syria negotiated an agreement to unite Iraq and Syria, but Saddam feared losing power to Assad. Negotiations continued unsuccessfully.
2) Saddam Hussein rose to power in Iraq in 1979 as a Ba'ath Party member. He faced opposition from the Shi'ite majority in Iraq and used Islamism to counter this threat and unite Sunnis.
3) The networks and Islamist militants supported today in Iraq by Turkey and Gulf Arabs were originally formed and trained under Saddam Hussein.
A brief summary of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, of the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, and how these historic events were related to terrorism, and more specifically to Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State.
The Afghan Oil Pipeline and the US Negotiations with the Talibaniakovosal
This document summarizes negotiations between the US and the Taliban in the 1990s regarding proposed oil and gas pipelines from Central Asia through Afghanistan. It discusses how the pipelines could benefit both countries economically but were opposed by Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Al Qaeda. The US offered diplomatic recognition of the Taliban in exchange for allowing pipeline construction, but talks broke down after Al Qaeda's 1998 embassy bombings in Africa. Negotiations continued under President Bush but were ultimately derailed by the 9/11 attacks. The document reveals that Al Qaeda closely monitored the pipeline negotiations and sought to sabotage them to maintain its alliance with the Taliban.
Pakistan found itself allied with both the U.S. and the Afghan Taliban after the U.S. overthrew the Taliban government in 2001. Pakistan received substantial military aid from the U.S. but also created and supported the Afghan Taliban to fight Pakistan's enemies in Afghanistan. This left Pakistan trying to please both allies through a contradictory policy of supporting the U.S. against al-Qaeda while also maintaining ties to the Taliban and indirectly to al-Qaeda. Pakistan faced pressure from the U.S. to crack down on militants but attacking al-Qaeda or the Taliban threatened relations with Arab allies and Pakistani groups allied with them.
Haji Sahib Rohullah Wakil is assessedto pose a high risk threat. He is a 45-year-old Afghan citizen and important politician from Konar Province who provided operational support to al-Qaida. Detainee assisted Arabs associated with al-Qaida to infiltrate and exfiltrate from Afghanistan and Pakistan after the fall of the Taliban regime. He also worked with anti-Afghan government factions and Pakistani intelligence to destabilize the interim Afghan administration. Detainee remains a threat due to his past involvement with al-Qaida, support for insurgent groups, and efforts to undermine the Afghan government.
1) There were many problems in the relationship between Iran and Libya's Qaddafi in the years leading up to the 2011 Arab Spring, including disagreements over nuclear cooperation with France and support for opposing sides in conflicts in Lebanon, Sudan, and against Al Qaeda.
2) Iran played a role in supporting anti-Qaddafi forces during the Libyan Arab Spring through its allies Sudan and Hezbollah, who were among the first on the ground assisting rebels.
3) France's decision to intervene militarily against Qaddafi was driven partly by fears that Iranian or Turkish influence could grow in post-Qaddafi Libya if they did not act.
The document discusses the origins and geopolitics of ISIS. It notes that ISIS emerged from former members of Saddam Hussein's government after the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. It analyzes ISIS' relationships with neighboring countries including hostility with Iran and Syria but friendlier relations with Turkey and Jordan. The document also examines ISIS' goals of establishing control over Sunni regions and its options for gaining sponsors to further its agenda.
An armed conflict concerns government and/or territory where the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, results in battle-related death
1948 war over Kashmir
1965 India-Pakistan war
1971 India-Pakistan and Fall of Dhaka
Siachen Dispute and Sir creek
Kargil conflict 99
Saddam Hussein : The Father of ISIS in Iraqiakovosal
1) In the 1970s, Saddam Hussein and Hafez al-Assad of Syria negotiated an agreement to unite Iraq and Syria, but Saddam feared losing power to Assad. Negotiations continued unsuccessfully.
2) Saddam Hussein rose to power in Iraq in 1979 as a Ba'ath Party member. He faced opposition from the Shi'ite majority in Iraq and used Islamism to counter this threat and unite Sunnis.
3) The networks and Islamist militants supported today in Iraq by Turkey and Gulf Arabs were originally formed and trained under Saddam Hussein.
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have enjoyed close bilateral relations since Pakistan's establishment in 1947. Saudi Arabia was one of Pakistan's strongest supporters during its wars with India and opposes the creation of Bangladesh from Pakistan in 1971. Saudi Arabia supports Pakistan on the Kashmir conflict and was the only country that supported Pakistan's nuclear tests in 1998. Pakistan maintains close military ties with Saudi Arabia and has provided arms and training for Saudi armed forces. Saudi Arabia also provides significant religious, educational, and financial aid to Pakistan and is Pakistan's largest source of petroleum.
The document provides a chronology of key events in the Kashmir dispute from 1947 to 2017 between India and Pakistan over control of the Kashmir region. It outlines the partition of the subcontinent in 1947 that led to the Maharaja of Kashmir's accession to India and the first war between India and Pakistan over the region. Subsequent events include three wars, a Simla Agreement, a pro-independence insurgency in Indian-administered Kashmir in the late 1980s, and continuing violence and tensions along the Line of Control dividing the region.
After 9/11, Pakistan faced pressure from the US to support the war on terror and cut ties with the Taliban. Pakistan decided to support the interim Afghan government under Hamid Karzai. However, border tensions and clashes continued between Pakistan and Afghanistan throughout the 2000s and 2010s over militant activity and border security. Both countries attempted diplomatic negotiations and confidence-building measures to improve their strained relationship.
This document discusses the history of the Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan. It describes how Kashmir, a Muslim-majority region, ended up under Indian control after partition. This led to tensions and sparked the first war between India and Pakistan over Kashmir in 1965. The war began with border skirmishes in the Rann of Kutch region that escalated into a broader conflict. Though India had the upper hand before a ceasefire, the war failed to resolve the underlying dispute over Kashmir's status.
Osama bin Laden was a terrorist leader who founded al-Qaeda. He earned a degree in civil engineering but later joined mujahideen fighters in Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion. Bin Laden formed al-Qaeda and believed in restoring sharia law through violent jihad. He was involved in numerous terrorist attacks against American and other Western targets from the 1990s until being killed by U.S. special forces in 2011.
Jammu and Kashmir Problems and Solutionsvsrcchennai
This document discusses Jammu and Kashmir, providing historical context and perspectives on the Kashmir issue. It outlines the region's history under various rulers from ancient times through the partition of India in 1947. It notes that Jammu and Kashmir formally acceded to India through an instrument of accession signed on October 26, 1947. However, the issue was later internationalized and taken up by the UN, leading to the line of control. The document decodes common myths and argues that Kashmir has long been integrated with Indian culture and the issue is one of nationality, not religion. It calls for full integration of Jammu and Kashmir into India by scrapping Article 370.
The document discusses Pakistan's role and relations within the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). It notes that Pakistan was a founding member of the OIC in 1969 and has since played an important leadership role, currently chairing several OIC committees. The document also outlines Pakistan's support for Palestinian rights and opposition to recognition of Israel. It discusses Pakistan's close economic and strategic relations with Saudi Arabia and Iran, though relations with Iran have been complicated by disagreements over Afghanistan and sectarian tensions.
The document summarizes the events of the 1947-48 Kashmir War between Pakistan and India over control of the princely state of Kashmir. It describes how initially in late 1947, Pakistani tribesmen and militias supported by Pakistani officials gained control of parts of Kashmir, including capturing Muzaffarabad. However, opportunities for further advances towards Srinagar were lost due to disagreements among Pakistani leaders and the tribesmen stopping to celebrate Eid, allowing India to airlift troops to Srinagar and stabilize the front. While Pakistan had initial geographical and other advantages, failures of leadership and coordination prevented them from capitalizing on opportunities to win control of all of Kashmir early in the conflict.
The document provides information on the geography, history, economy and 2014 floods of Kashmir. It discusses how Kashmir's geography led to the formation of the valley, its climate, vegetation and irrigation. It outlines Kashmir's history under various rulers and the events leading to its accession to India. The economy has traditionally centered around agriculture, especially rice. In 2014, heavy monsoon rains triggered severe flooding and landslides across Kashmir and adjoining areas, destroying property and displacing many. Diseases spread due to contaminated water and thousands had to migrate temporarily to relief camps.
The Kashmir dispute is a long-standing territorial conflict between India and Pakistan over the Kashmir region. Kashmir is important to both countries for strategic reasons, including its water resources and proximity to key transportation routes. The conflict has led to multiple wars between India and Pakistan and remains a flashpoint for potential nuclear conflict in the region. Despite UN resolutions calling for a plebiscite to determine Kashmir's status, India has resisted allowing Kashmiris a vote for independence for over 55 years. The dispute remains unresolved and a serious threat to regional stability and security.
This document provides an overview of the geography, history and current status of Jammu and Kashmir. It discusses how the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir acceded to India in 1947 following an invasion by tribesmen from Pakistan. It notes that parts of the former state are currently occupied by Pakistan and China. The document outlines issues like terrorism, the status of refugees and displaced people. It discusses the 1994 parliamentary resolution reaffirming Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of India. It proposes strategic importance of the Pakistan-occupied parts of Kashmir and outlines a way forward for the government of India.
The Kashmir conflict is a long-standing territorial dispute between India and Pakistan over the Kashmir region that has led to three wars since 1947. Kashmir was divided between India and Pakistan after independence, with China also occupying a small northern portion. India controls 48% of the region, Pakistan controls 35%, and China controls the remaining 17%. The people of Kashmir seek independence after suffering for 65 years due to the conflict between India and Pakistan. Both countries have tried but failed to resolve the issue through diplomacy and negotiations. The future of Kashmir remains uncertain as a peaceful resolution has evaded the region for decades.
The document summarizes the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. It provides geographical and historical context, describing Kashmir as a disputed region with a Muslim majority population administered in parts by India, Pakistan, and China. It outlines the wars fought between India and Pakistan over Kashmir in 1947-1948, 1965, and 1971. The current situation involves ongoing violence and civilian casualties, with India accused of human rights violations. Both countries claim Kashmir but have been urged to resolve the dispute bilaterally through negotiations.
The Kashmir conflict involves four parties - India, Pakistan, China, and Kashmiris. Kashmir was historically ruled by a Hindu maharaja but has a majority Muslim population. At independence, the maharaja signed Kashmir to India but Pakistan disputes this. The region has been a source of conflict through three wars and ongoing tensions. Both countries claim the region but the UN has called for a plebiscite to let Kashmiris decide their own fate. The dispute remains unresolved with no clear solution in sight.
The document summarizes the impact of 9/11 and the subsequent War on Terror on Pakistan. It discusses how Pakistan agreed to support the US by providing military/intelligence assistance. This caused devastating effects in Pakistan like a rise in terrorism, loss of lives, damage to the economy and tourism. It also discusses Indian interference in Pakistan through sponsorship of terrorist groups and the Balochistan insurgency. The document concludes by outlining counterterrorism operations conducted by the Pakistani military to combat terrorist groups.
This document provides an overview of the relationship between Pakistan and India, with a focus on the disputed region of Kashmir. It discusses:
1) The partition of British India and how Kashmir's accession became a point of contention.
2) India's diplomatic success in portraying Kashmir as an internal issue rather than an international dispute, due to its unified stance compared to divisions within Pakistan.
3) The origins of the Kashmir dispute, from the maharaja's rule to the UN resolutions calling for a plebiscite that was never implemented.
4) Various proposals over the decades to resolve the dispute through compromise, such as an independent Kashmir or accepting the current line of control
The document summarizes the history of the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan from 1947 to 1997. It details how Kashmir's ruler initially opted for independence but then signed onto accession with India, leading Pakistan to send forces and sparking the first war over Kashmir in 1947. The conflict has since involved UN resolutions and mediation attempts, as well as additional wars between India and Pakistan in 1965 and 1971. Insurgencies also began in Indian-administered Kashmir in 1989, straining relations further and raising nuclear tensions between the neighbors.
The Kashmir conflict is a territorial dispute over the Kashmir region between India, Pakistan, and China. After the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947, the Maharaja of Kashmir opted to join India, though parts of Kashmir were occupied by Pakistan. This led to the first Indo-Pakistani war over Kashmir. A ceasefire line divided the region, which later became the Line of Control (LOC). Subsequent wars and negotiations failed to resolve the dispute. Both countries claim the entire region of Kashmir, and have fought several wars over it. The conflict remains ongoing, with disputes over borders and occasional military clashes along the LOC.
Pakistan and Iran have a long history of close relations since Pakistan's establishment in 1947. Iran was the first country to recognize Pakistan and the two countries signed a treaty of friendship in 1950. They have supported each other both militarily and economically over the years, including during the 1965 and 1971 Indo-Pakistan wars. While relations faced some difficulties during the Soviet-Afghan war and rise of the Taliban, the countries have worked to rehabilitate ties in recent decades. They continue economic cooperation like on a proposed Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline and aim to strengthen security cooperation along their shared border.
Pakistan has experienced significant political, economic, and security challenges since 2006. The economy grew rapidly until 2008 but then declined as foreign reserves decreased sharply. Meanwhile, the political situation was unstable as Musharraf faced rising opposition and was eventually replaced by a civilian government. However, terrorism remained a major security threat, with ongoing military operations against militants in regions like Waziristan and Swat.
The Russian Expedtions in Afghanistan (1979) and Syria (2015) : A Comparisoniakovosal
The document provides a detailed comparison of Russia's expeditions to Afghanistan in 1979 and Syria in 2015. Some key similarities and differences include:
- In both cases, Russia aimed to support socialist governments from Islamist opposition, but faced resistance from various countries for different reasons.
- Russia's goals and challenges were greater in Afghanistan, as it faced united opposition from the US, China, Iran, Pakistan, and Gulf Arabs who all saw the invasion as a threat.
- Russia's role is more limited in Syria, aiming to support Assad in coastal areas rather than control the whole country. It has support from Iran and Iraq against Islamist groups backed by Turkey and Gulf Arabs.
- Geopolit
Hasan Mahsun was the leader of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, which wants an independent Muslim Xin Jiang province in China. In 2003, the United States, Pakistan, and China killed Mahsun while he was hiding in Pakistan. Similarly, after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan ended, the United States wanted to transport oil and gas from Central Asia through Afghanistan, but faced opposition from the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The 9/11 attacks on the United States were planned by Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan, with support from Iran and other countries.
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have enjoyed close bilateral relations since Pakistan's establishment in 1947. Saudi Arabia was one of Pakistan's strongest supporters during its wars with India and opposes the creation of Bangladesh from Pakistan in 1971. Saudi Arabia supports Pakistan on the Kashmir conflict and was the only country that supported Pakistan's nuclear tests in 1998. Pakistan maintains close military ties with Saudi Arabia and has provided arms and training for Saudi armed forces. Saudi Arabia also provides significant religious, educational, and financial aid to Pakistan and is Pakistan's largest source of petroleum.
The document provides a chronology of key events in the Kashmir dispute from 1947 to 2017 between India and Pakistan over control of the Kashmir region. It outlines the partition of the subcontinent in 1947 that led to the Maharaja of Kashmir's accession to India and the first war between India and Pakistan over the region. Subsequent events include three wars, a Simla Agreement, a pro-independence insurgency in Indian-administered Kashmir in the late 1980s, and continuing violence and tensions along the Line of Control dividing the region.
After 9/11, Pakistan faced pressure from the US to support the war on terror and cut ties with the Taliban. Pakistan decided to support the interim Afghan government under Hamid Karzai. However, border tensions and clashes continued between Pakistan and Afghanistan throughout the 2000s and 2010s over militant activity and border security. Both countries attempted diplomatic negotiations and confidence-building measures to improve their strained relationship.
This document discusses the history of the Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan. It describes how Kashmir, a Muslim-majority region, ended up under Indian control after partition. This led to tensions and sparked the first war between India and Pakistan over Kashmir in 1965. The war began with border skirmishes in the Rann of Kutch region that escalated into a broader conflict. Though India had the upper hand before a ceasefire, the war failed to resolve the underlying dispute over Kashmir's status.
Osama bin Laden was a terrorist leader who founded al-Qaeda. He earned a degree in civil engineering but later joined mujahideen fighters in Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion. Bin Laden formed al-Qaeda and believed in restoring sharia law through violent jihad. He was involved in numerous terrorist attacks against American and other Western targets from the 1990s until being killed by U.S. special forces in 2011.
Jammu and Kashmir Problems and Solutionsvsrcchennai
This document discusses Jammu and Kashmir, providing historical context and perspectives on the Kashmir issue. It outlines the region's history under various rulers from ancient times through the partition of India in 1947. It notes that Jammu and Kashmir formally acceded to India through an instrument of accession signed on October 26, 1947. However, the issue was later internationalized and taken up by the UN, leading to the line of control. The document decodes common myths and argues that Kashmir has long been integrated with Indian culture and the issue is one of nationality, not religion. It calls for full integration of Jammu and Kashmir into India by scrapping Article 370.
The document discusses Pakistan's role and relations within the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). It notes that Pakistan was a founding member of the OIC in 1969 and has since played an important leadership role, currently chairing several OIC committees. The document also outlines Pakistan's support for Palestinian rights and opposition to recognition of Israel. It discusses Pakistan's close economic and strategic relations with Saudi Arabia and Iran, though relations with Iran have been complicated by disagreements over Afghanistan and sectarian tensions.
The document summarizes the events of the 1947-48 Kashmir War between Pakistan and India over control of the princely state of Kashmir. It describes how initially in late 1947, Pakistani tribesmen and militias supported by Pakistani officials gained control of parts of Kashmir, including capturing Muzaffarabad. However, opportunities for further advances towards Srinagar were lost due to disagreements among Pakistani leaders and the tribesmen stopping to celebrate Eid, allowing India to airlift troops to Srinagar and stabilize the front. While Pakistan had initial geographical and other advantages, failures of leadership and coordination prevented them from capitalizing on opportunities to win control of all of Kashmir early in the conflict.
The document provides information on the geography, history, economy and 2014 floods of Kashmir. It discusses how Kashmir's geography led to the formation of the valley, its climate, vegetation and irrigation. It outlines Kashmir's history under various rulers and the events leading to its accession to India. The economy has traditionally centered around agriculture, especially rice. In 2014, heavy monsoon rains triggered severe flooding and landslides across Kashmir and adjoining areas, destroying property and displacing many. Diseases spread due to contaminated water and thousands had to migrate temporarily to relief camps.
The Kashmir dispute is a long-standing territorial conflict between India and Pakistan over the Kashmir region. Kashmir is important to both countries for strategic reasons, including its water resources and proximity to key transportation routes. The conflict has led to multiple wars between India and Pakistan and remains a flashpoint for potential nuclear conflict in the region. Despite UN resolutions calling for a plebiscite to determine Kashmir's status, India has resisted allowing Kashmiris a vote for independence for over 55 years. The dispute remains unresolved and a serious threat to regional stability and security.
This document provides an overview of the geography, history and current status of Jammu and Kashmir. It discusses how the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir acceded to India in 1947 following an invasion by tribesmen from Pakistan. It notes that parts of the former state are currently occupied by Pakistan and China. The document outlines issues like terrorism, the status of refugees and displaced people. It discusses the 1994 parliamentary resolution reaffirming Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of India. It proposes strategic importance of the Pakistan-occupied parts of Kashmir and outlines a way forward for the government of India.
The Kashmir conflict is a long-standing territorial dispute between India and Pakistan over the Kashmir region that has led to three wars since 1947. Kashmir was divided between India and Pakistan after independence, with China also occupying a small northern portion. India controls 48% of the region, Pakistan controls 35%, and China controls the remaining 17%. The people of Kashmir seek independence after suffering for 65 years due to the conflict between India and Pakistan. Both countries have tried but failed to resolve the issue through diplomacy and negotiations. The future of Kashmir remains uncertain as a peaceful resolution has evaded the region for decades.
The document summarizes the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. It provides geographical and historical context, describing Kashmir as a disputed region with a Muslim majority population administered in parts by India, Pakistan, and China. It outlines the wars fought between India and Pakistan over Kashmir in 1947-1948, 1965, and 1971. The current situation involves ongoing violence and civilian casualties, with India accused of human rights violations. Both countries claim Kashmir but have been urged to resolve the dispute bilaterally through negotiations.
The Kashmir conflict involves four parties - India, Pakistan, China, and Kashmiris. Kashmir was historically ruled by a Hindu maharaja but has a majority Muslim population. At independence, the maharaja signed Kashmir to India but Pakistan disputes this. The region has been a source of conflict through three wars and ongoing tensions. Both countries claim the region but the UN has called for a plebiscite to let Kashmiris decide their own fate. The dispute remains unresolved with no clear solution in sight.
The document summarizes the impact of 9/11 and the subsequent War on Terror on Pakistan. It discusses how Pakistan agreed to support the US by providing military/intelligence assistance. This caused devastating effects in Pakistan like a rise in terrorism, loss of lives, damage to the economy and tourism. It also discusses Indian interference in Pakistan through sponsorship of terrorist groups and the Balochistan insurgency. The document concludes by outlining counterterrorism operations conducted by the Pakistani military to combat terrorist groups.
This document provides an overview of the relationship between Pakistan and India, with a focus on the disputed region of Kashmir. It discusses:
1) The partition of British India and how Kashmir's accession became a point of contention.
2) India's diplomatic success in portraying Kashmir as an internal issue rather than an international dispute, due to its unified stance compared to divisions within Pakistan.
3) The origins of the Kashmir dispute, from the maharaja's rule to the UN resolutions calling for a plebiscite that was never implemented.
4) Various proposals over the decades to resolve the dispute through compromise, such as an independent Kashmir or accepting the current line of control
The document summarizes the history of the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan from 1947 to 1997. It details how Kashmir's ruler initially opted for independence but then signed onto accession with India, leading Pakistan to send forces and sparking the first war over Kashmir in 1947. The conflict has since involved UN resolutions and mediation attempts, as well as additional wars between India and Pakistan in 1965 and 1971. Insurgencies also began in Indian-administered Kashmir in 1989, straining relations further and raising nuclear tensions between the neighbors.
The Kashmir conflict is a territorial dispute over the Kashmir region between India, Pakistan, and China. After the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947, the Maharaja of Kashmir opted to join India, though parts of Kashmir were occupied by Pakistan. This led to the first Indo-Pakistani war over Kashmir. A ceasefire line divided the region, which later became the Line of Control (LOC). Subsequent wars and negotiations failed to resolve the dispute. Both countries claim the entire region of Kashmir, and have fought several wars over it. The conflict remains ongoing, with disputes over borders and occasional military clashes along the LOC.
Pakistan and Iran have a long history of close relations since Pakistan's establishment in 1947. Iran was the first country to recognize Pakistan and the two countries signed a treaty of friendship in 1950. They have supported each other both militarily and economically over the years, including during the 1965 and 1971 Indo-Pakistan wars. While relations faced some difficulties during the Soviet-Afghan war and rise of the Taliban, the countries have worked to rehabilitate ties in recent decades. They continue economic cooperation like on a proposed Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline and aim to strengthen security cooperation along their shared border.
Pakistan has experienced significant political, economic, and security challenges since 2006. The economy grew rapidly until 2008 but then declined as foreign reserves decreased sharply. Meanwhile, the political situation was unstable as Musharraf faced rising opposition and was eventually replaced by a civilian government. However, terrorism remained a major security threat, with ongoing military operations against militants in regions like Waziristan and Swat.
The Russian Expedtions in Afghanistan (1979) and Syria (2015) : A Comparisoniakovosal
The document provides a detailed comparison of Russia's expeditions to Afghanistan in 1979 and Syria in 2015. Some key similarities and differences include:
- In both cases, Russia aimed to support socialist governments from Islamist opposition, but faced resistance from various countries for different reasons.
- Russia's goals and challenges were greater in Afghanistan, as it faced united opposition from the US, China, Iran, Pakistan, and Gulf Arabs who all saw the invasion as a threat.
- Russia's role is more limited in Syria, aiming to support Assad in coastal areas rather than control the whole country. It has support from Iran and Iraq against Islamist groups backed by Turkey and Gulf Arabs.
- Geopolit
Hasan Mahsun was the leader of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, which wants an independent Muslim Xin Jiang province in China. In 2003, the United States, Pakistan, and China killed Mahsun while he was hiding in Pakistan. Similarly, after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan ended, the United States wanted to transport oil and gas from Central Asia through Afghanistan, but faced opposition from the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The 9/11 attacks on the United States were planned by Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan, with support from Iran and other countries.
A Summary of the Wars of the 21st Centuryiakovosal
The document provides summaries of several 21st century wars including:
- The Iraq War of 2003 where the US sought to overthrow Saddam Hussein to allow Iraqi oil to flow freely.
- The Afghanistan War of 2001 where the US fought the Taliban to enable Central Asian oil and gas exports to bypass rivals like Iran.
- The Arab Spring uprisings in Syria and Libya which were influenced by regional powers seeking to gain control over energy resources and transportation routes.
- The War in Ukraine stemming from Russia and Ukraine's competition over natural gas exports to Europe.
- Conflicts involving the Kurds as their territories in Iraq, Iran, and Turkey contain significant oil and gas reserves important to
1) Al-Qaeda supported terrorist groups in Pakistan that operated against India in Kashmir, as Osama bin Laden saw India as part of a global Jewish conspiracy. Bin Laden also cooperated with Iran despite considering Shia Muslims as heretics, as Iran was an enemy of the United States and Saudi Arabia.
2) Control of Kashmir was important geopolitically as it would allow India access to Central Asian oil and gas, bypassing Pakistan and breaking the connection between Pakistan and China.
3) The alliance between Al-Qaeda and Pakistan against India in Kashmir served both of their interests, as Al-Qaeda did not want India accessing Central Asian resources and Pakistan wanted to maintain influence over Central Asia.
The Difference Between Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhoodiakovosal
The document discusses the differences between Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. While both advocate for Islamic governance, the Muslim Brotherhood aims to overturn opponents through elections and allows some cooperation, whereas Al-Qaeda uses terrorism and does not tolerate any cooperation. The two groups have overlapping membership and are both used by various Muslim countries against their opponents. The key difference is that the Muslim Brotherhood uses elections to attack opponents, while Al-Qaeda uses terrorism.
Erdogan's Efforts to Unite the Muslim Worldiakovosal
Erdogan attempted to unite Iran and Saudi Arabia at the Organization of Islamic Cooperation summit by positioning the Saudi King to his right and Iranian President to his left. However, achieving détente between the two rivals will be difficult due to ongoing geopolitical conflicts over oil exports, religious differences, and support for opposing factions in regional conflicts. While increased cooperation between Iran and Saudi Arabia could benefit Turkey's goals of reducing dependence on Russian gas, many challenges around other countries' interests remain.
The Geopolitics of Energy and Terrorism Part 10iakovosal
Τhe connection between the energy policies of various countries with the wars that break out at various parts of the world, i.e. at the Middle East and North Africa etc
The document discusses the alliance formed in Sudan in the early 1990s between Iran, Hezbollah, and Al Qaeda, facilitated by Sudan's Islamic regime. Osama bin Laden met with Iranian leadership, and they agreed that Hezbollah would provide explosives training to Al Qaeda recruits. This alliance carried out several terrorist attacks, including 9/11. However, the alliance is partial and opportunistic given the Sunni-Shia divide between Al Qaeda and Iran's backers. The document also describes Hezbollah and Iranian operations in Latin America, including drug and weapons trafficking networks extending to Mexico and the United States.
During the Cold War period from the 1960s to 1970s:
- China became isolated after splitting with the Soviet Union ideologically and was only closely aligned with North Korea and Albania. Other communist countries sided either with China or Russia.
- Pakistan was China's only neighborly ally, despite also being allied with the United States. Both countries supported anti-Soviet forces in Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion from 1979-1989.
- Iran attacked Soviet forces in Afghanistan but maintained distance from the U.S., Pakistan, and Gulf Arab states by backing Shia Islamist groups in Afghanistan.
- Iran, Sudan, and Hezbollah had previously strongly supported Al-Qaeda in attacking France in Africa by providing weapons, funding, and intelligence support. Sudan provided Iran a corridor to project influence and support terrorist groups in West Africa.
- However, the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran and Sudan realigning with Saudi Arabia reduced Iran and Sudan's ability to support Al-Qaeda against France. This changed the threat environment for attacks on France emanating from Africa.
- Turkey is also an enemy of France but cannot strongly support Al-Qaeda due to its alliance with the United States, against whom Al-Qaeda also operates.
The geopolitics of energy & terrorism part 9iakovosal
This document provides background information on geopolitical issues related to energy and terrorism. It discusses the ethnic groups and borders in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Central Asia and China. It describes how the Taliban are comprised mainly of Pashtuns from Afghanistan and Pakistan. It also discusses how the "Great Game" between Britain and Russia evolved into the "New Great Game" between global powers competing for influence and access to oil/gas in Central Asia after the Soviet collapse. Additionally, it details Germany's role in supporting Lenin and the rise of Russian communism before WWI to weaken their rival, the Russian Empire.
This document discusses and compares the ideologies of Pan-Arabism and Pan-Islamism. Pan-Arabism calls for unity among Arab peoples and was used by leaders like Nasser to form an Arab oil cartel. Pan-Islamism calls for unity among all Muslims and would involve an even larger oil cartel. Today, Erdogan promotes Pan-Islamism to expand Turkey's influence over oil and gas pipelines from regions including Iran. Different leaders have utilized Pan-Arabism and Pan-Islamism throughout history to increase control over oil resources and trade routes in the Middle East and North Africa.
The Business of Terrorist formation not in the name of Religion or Even War b...KhSakibFarhad
1) Terrorist groups are formed and manipulated for political and economic interests rather than purely religious reasons.
2) During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980s, the CIA recruited and funded Afghan mujahideen groups like the Taliban to wage proxy war against the Soviets, with weapons supplied by China.
3) Figures like Osama bin Laden were involved in this effort and went on to target the US and other countries after the Soviet withdrawal, but the formation and actions of terrorist groups were ultimately driven by geopolitical factors relating to oil interests and arms manufacturing.
The document provides historical context on the war in Afghanistan, discussing key events from the Soviet invasion in 1979 to the rise of the Taliban in the 1990s and their takeover of Kabul in 1996 with Pakistani support. It then analyzes wider geopolitical implications, including concerns over instability in Central Asia, the Gulf, the Indian Ocean region, and the strategic interests and rivalries of major powers like China, India, Russia, Iran and Pakistan in gaining access to the region's oil and gas resources.
- The Paris terrorist attacks of November 2015 suggested a shift in ISIS strategy, as they directly targeted the West for the first time. Previously, ISIS had mainly targeted Shiite Muslims and not Western countries.
- For Al Qaeda, the West has long been an enemy because of US efforts to control oil pipelines from Central Asia and its military presence in Saudi Arabia after 1991. This led to major terrorist attacks on US soil like 9/11.
- In contrast, ISIS saw the West as useful initially in its goal of overthrowing Assad in Syria, who was allied with Russia and Iran. But Western reluctance to intervene more strongly in Syria may be changing ISIS' calculus regarding the West.
The document discusses the geopolitical rivalry between various powers over control and influence in Central Asia, referred to as the "New Great Game". It describes how after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States, China, India, Russia, and others have competed for political and economic influence in the region. Control over Central Asia's oil and gas reserves and transportation routes has been a key factor driving this modern Great Game.
This document provides a brief history of Afghanistan from 50,000 BCE to the present day. It covers the early human settlements and introduction of farming, invasions and conquests by various groups like the Aryans, Persians, Greeks, and Arabs who brought new religions. It then discusses the period of British influence and wars in the 19th century, as well as periods of instability, communist rule, and the Soviet invasion. Finally, it outlines the rise of the Taliban in the 1990s, their rule over most of Afghanistan, and their hosting of Al Qaeda until being driven from power after 9/11.
Libya and Syria : The 2 Arab Allies of Iraniakovosal
This document summarizes the relationships between Libya, Syria, and Iran from 1969-2011. It explains that Gaddafi of Libya and Hafez al-Assad of Syria both supported Iran during the Iran-Iraq war from 1980-1988, as they were both socialist dictators and rivals of Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Gaddafi supported Iran to counter Western influence in the region and because Iran would cause problems for Gulf Arab oil producers that competed with Libya. Syria supported Iran in hopes that an Iranian victory could allow Syrian access to Iraqi and Iranian oil exports. The document provides historical context on the relationships and geopolitical factors that led Libya and Syria to align with Iran during this period.
Pan islamism and its dangers assessed in 2000Agha A
This document provides a lengthy analysis of geopolitical issues related to Pan-Islamism, Iran, Afghanistan, and Chechnya from a historical perspective. The author argues that Pan-Islamism overlooks important geographical, ethnic, and historical realities. Religious affiliation alone is not enough to unite states or peoples. National interests and ethnic identities are also important factors. The author also criticizes the oversimplified view that the Afghan war was a triumph of Islam over communism, arguing instead that it was a proxy conflict manipulated by outside powers for their own interests.
The Saudi-Iranian rivalry has spilled over into Africa, with Sudan, Somalia, and Djibouti officially supporting Saudi Arabia after tensions rose between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2016. Saudi Arabia has promised to construct large dams for Sudan and Somalia to promote agriculture and energy. Egypt, Sudan, Somalia, and Djibouti are also strategically important countries for controlling the Red Sea, where a civil war is occurring in Yemen with Saudi backing the government and Iran backing Houthi rebels. However, Iran still maintains influence in these African countries and is accused of supplying arms to terrorist groups like al-Shabaab in Somalia.
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
2. Table of Contents
The Birth of Al-Qaeda
Al-Qaeda as a Mutlinational
Al-Qaeda and Iran
Al-Qaeda and Israel
Articles
3. The Birth of Al-Qaeda
When the Soviets announced that they were about to leave from Afghanistan
in 1988, and they actually did so in 1989, Osama bin Laden, a rich Saudi,
together with his Arab comrades, were in Afghanistan fighting the Soviets.
In 1988 Osama bin Laden, with his best Arab comrades founded Al-Qaeda.
By reading the Al-Qaeda’s story one can easily understand why this
organization was founded.
After the Soviets left Afghanistan, a civil war broke out between the Iranians
and the Pakistanis. The Iranians were supported by the Indians and the
Pakistanis were supported by the Arabs of the Persian Gulf. Obviously the
first aim of Al-Qaeda was to help their Pakistani allies fight Iran and take
control of Afghanistan.
When the Soviets left Afghanistan they agreed with the Americans that none
of them would militarily intervene in Afghanistan. The Chinese had fought
the Soviets in Afghanistan too, but they did not want to get involved in a
Muslim war fought by Iran, Pakistan and the Arabs, because no matter who
China would choose to support, the other parties would support the Muslim
Uyghur separatists in Xin Jiang, the Muslim province of China, in order to
retaliate for China’s involvement.
Remember that the Iranians, the Arabs and the Pakistanis were all fighting
the Soviets in Afghanistan, and therefore by supporting the Muslims the
Chinese were safe during the period of the Soviet invasion. Safe in the sense
4. that no Muslim militants would support Uyghur separatists in Xin Jiang.
Actually during the Soviet invasion the Chinese were sending Uyghurs to
their ally Pakistan, and Pakistan was training them to fight the Soviets.
Therefore the Americans, the Russians and the Chinese were not supposed
to get involved in Afghanistan, at least not directly, and a civil war broke out
when the Soviets left.
The Communist government that was left behind by the Soviets lasted from
1989 until 1992, when it was overturned by Iran’s allies in 1992, who were
in turn overturned in 1996 by Pakistan’s allies, the Taliban, who were in turn
overturned by the Americans in 2001, after the 9/11 attack and the refusal of
the Taliban to allow the pipelines of Central Asia to reach India.
For the negotiations between the Americans and the Taliban for the
pipeplines, and the Al-Qaeda attacks see “The Afghan Oil Pipeline and the
US Negotiations with the Taliban”.
At the following map you can see the ethnic groups of Afghanistan.
Map Ethnic Groups of Afghanistan
5. http://www.cfr.org/afghanistan/taliban-afghanistan/p10551
With green you can see the Pashtuns, who were mainly supported by the
Pakistanis and the Arabs. The Pashtuns are the larger ethnic group of the
country. All of the Taliban are Pashtuns, or at least their overwhelming
majority. But not all Pashtuns are Taliban.
With somon you can see the Shiite Hazara, a strong Iranian ally, and with
brown the Sunni Tajics, who are of Iranian origin though, and normally they
are Iranian allies too.
With purple you can see the Uzbeks of Afghanistan. Most Uzbkes have been
part of the Northern Alliance, which was supported by Iran, India and
Russia. But there were Uzbkes who allied with the Taliban too.
6. With blue, at the southern part of the country you can see the Baloch people.
The Baloch people live in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran, and there are
many among them who are calling for an independent Balochistan.
From all the above it is evident that the original goal of Al-Qaeda to help the
allies of the Arabs in Afghanistan to fight Iran once the Soviets left the
country. As long as the Soviets were there, the Muslims could achieve a
minimum level of cooperation, since none of them wanted a communist
Afghanistan. But once the Soviets left Afghanistan, there was a civil war
about who would control the post-Soviet Afghanistan.
7. Al-Qaeda as a Multinational
When the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in 1996, with the help of
Pakistan and the Arabs, there were negotiations between the Americans and
the Taliban, because the Americans were offering the Taliban international
recognition if they were to allow the pipelines of Central Asia to be
constructed.
Note that Turkmenistan is one of the richest countries in the world in terms
of natural gas reserves, Kazahstan is one of the richest in terms of oil
reserves, and Azerbaijan has descent amounts of both. Uzbekistan also has
some descent reserves of natural gas.
However if the Taliban were to allow the pipelines of Central Asia to reach
Pakistan and India, both the Arab and the Iranian exports would be hurt, and
therefore Al-Qaeda sabotaged the negotiations with the bombings of the
American embassies in 1998, and with the 9/11 attack in 2001. See “The
Afghan Oil Pipeline and the US Negotiations with the Taliban”.
Therefore one goal of Al-Qaeda was to fight Iran in Afghanistan, and the
other was to prevent the oil and natural gas of Central Asia to reach India
and the Indian Ocean. Actually that second goal was a common goal for the
Iranians and the Arabs, and it gave them plenty of space to cooperate against
the Americans, because they both sell oil and gas to India and Pakistan.
8. Another goal of Al-Qaeda was to support the Pakistanis against India in
Kashmir. Kashmir is a disputed region on the Pakistani-Indian borders, and
If India was to take control of Kashmir the Indians could reach Central Asia
bypassing Afghanistan, and they could export their merchandizes to Central
Asia, while at the same time they could import oil and natural gas from
Central Asia, bypassing Pakistan. Obviously that would be very bad for the
Arabs and the Pakistanis, and Al-Qaeda started fighting India at Kashmir.
That would also hurt China, because China is now monopolizing central
Asia commercially, and she can buy the resources of Central Asia at very
low prices, because these countries have nowhere else to sell their products,
except Russia and Iran, which are competitors in the oil and natural gas
markets. For more details see “Al-Qaeda VS India”
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2016/07/08/al-qaeda-vs-india/
Map Kashmir
9. http://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/jammuandkashmir/jammu-and-
kashmir.jpg
Another goal of Al-Qaeda was to block the oil and natural gas of Africa
from reaching Asia through Kenya and Tanzania. China is spending billions
of dollars in Kenya, trying to make Kenya an export hub, in order to send
African raw materials to China, with oil and natural gas being the most
10. important ones of course. With its alliance with the Somalian terrorist group
Al-Shabaab, Al-Qaeda is attacking Kenya and Tanzania. See “What is Al-
Shabaab, and what does it want?”, July 2015.
Map
Al-Qaeda was also targeting the oil of North and Western Africa, through
various terrorist groups it supported there. For example Al-Qaeda was
supporting Boko Haram in Nigeria in order to attack the oil of Nigeria. See
“Boko Haram's Bin Laden Connection”, May 2014
Philippines and Malaysia are oil and gas exporting countries too, and Al-
Qaeda was attacking these countries too.
With black at the following map you can see the countries that mainly
export oil and natural gas. Venezuela, Colombia, Bolivia in Latin America,
11. Russia and the countries of Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan,
Uzbekistan), the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf and Iran, Indonesia and
Malaysia in South East Asia, and Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Chad, Nigeria and
Angola in Africa. You can see that the black parts of this map match with
the Al-Qaeda map.
Map Exports by Country
http://blog.triblive.com/thisjustin/wp-
content/uploads/sites/23/2014/05/ExportsByCountryGlobalPost.png
Map Al-Qaeda in the World
13. Al-Qaeda and Iran
Initially Osama bin Laden wanted to fight the Crusaders (NATO) and the
Indians, and not the Muslim Apostates i.e. the Muslim leaders who were
cooperating with the Crusaders, for example the Saudi King and the
Egyptian President, who at the time was Hozni Mubarack.
That changed when the Saudi King invited the Americans in the Persian
Gulf in 1991, in order to fight Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein had
invaded Kuwait and had taken its oil fields, having also “parked” his army at
the Saudi borders near the Saudi oil fields. Then Al-Qaeda started
cooperating with the Iranians against the Saudi King. We could assume that
many people in Saudi Arabia wanted a closer cooperation with China, which
was the new big customer in the Persian Gulf. Or maybe they just found a
chance to fight the Saudi King. After all there is a war inside the Royal
family of Saudi Arabia. See “The Hezbollah-Al Qaeda Axis”.
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2016/05/22/the-hezbollah-al-qaeda-axis/
See also “The Assassination of the Saudi King in 1975”.
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/the-assassination-of-the-saudi-king-
in-1975/
Osama bin Laden was no longer welcome in Saudi Arabia, and he was
exiled in 1992. He went to Sudan, the stronger Iranian ally at the time. Iran
and Sudan also have the same political system i.e. they are both socialist
14. Islamic countries. In 1994 the Saudis will revoke Osama bin Laden’s
citizenship, and in 1996 the Sudanese will ask Osama bin Laden and Al-
Qaeda to leave Sudan, and bin Laden will go to Afghanistan.
I used to think that the reason the Sudanese asked bin Laden to leave their
country was because they were afraid of the Americans. But I was probably
wrong. After all the bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and
Tanzania only happened in 1998.
It had probably more to do with the fight between the Taliban and the
Iranian proxies in Afghanistan. And the Taliban were Osama bin Laden’s
allies. The Iranians and Al-Qaeda were jointly fighting the Saudi King and
the Americans, but they were fighting on opposite side in Afghanistan.
Saudi Arabia said she did not want Osama bin Laden extradited to Saudi
Arabia, because an imprisoned Osama bin Laden could upset the Saudi
people, because Osama bin Laden was a hero of the Afghanistan war. While
this might be true, there is another reason the Saudis would prefer bin Laden
in Afghanistan. For the Saudis it was important that Osama was not in Saudi
Arabia, but if he was in Afghanistan he would not cause much problems for
the Saudis, and he would prevent the Americans from sending the oil and
gas of Central Asia to the Indian Ocean. And the same was true for Iran.
And indeed with the bombing of the American embassies in Kenya and
Tanzania in 1998, and the 9/11 attack, Al-Qaeda sabotaged the US-Taliban
negotiations and the construction of the Central Asian pipelines, both under
15. the Clinton and Bush administrations, and did a favor to both the Saudis and
the Iranians.
Therefore if you want to understand Al-Qaeda you should not try to see it as
a Saudi or as an Iranian terrorist organization. Al-Qaeda received huge
amounts from Saudi donors, but it was trained by the Iranians. Obviously the
reason was that Al-Qaeda was fighting the Saudi King, and therefore the
Saudi government would not provide Al-Qaeda with assistance, at least not
in Saudi Arabia.
Al-Qaeda was also fighting the Americans, and therefore Pakistan would not
be able to help Al-Qaeda because the Americans would be very angry with
Pakistan. Of course the Pakistanis provided some indirect support to Al-
Qaeda, through their support to the Taliban, because the Afghan Taliban
were an ally of Pakistan, and the Taliban were an ally of Al-Qaeda. But
Pakistan could not support Al-Qaeda attacks against the United States,
because it was receiving billions in American and Saudi aid. See “Pakistan
Between Al-Qaeda and USA”.
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2016/07/08/pakistan-between-al-qaeda-and-usa/
Therefore against the Saudi King and the Americans, Iran and its close allies
Sudan and Hezbollah were the ideal partners for Al-Qaeda, even though in
Afghanistan Al-Qaeda was probably supported by the Saudi King against
the Iranians. Remember that terrorism is the Islamic and socialist way of
doing business. That’s how socialists and Islamists close their deals.
16. You should see Al-Qaeda as a sum of gangs, who are loosely connected.
These groups are guns for hire, and they are used by the Islamic oil cartel.
The cooperation between Al-Qaeda, a Saudi terror group, and Iran, seems
strange, but remember that their interests overlap in Africa, in South Eastern
Asia, and in Central Asia. They have opposite interests in Syria and
Afghanistan, and elsewhere, but there is a lot of space for cooperation
between them.
Therefore you should see Al-Qaeda as a terror group that protects the
Islamic oil cartel from the “Crusaders”, but which is also very active in the
internal wars of the Islamic oil cartel.
Now the Islamic oil cartel is threatened by the huge increases in the
American oil and natural gas production, and it cooperates with the
Communist oil cartel of Latin American too (Venezuela, Bolivia). The
Communist oil cartel also finances Cuba, another Communist country, and
therefore Cuba is also part of this unholy alliance between the Islamic and
the Communist oil cartels. Very often the Russians join the cartel against the
Americans too. Monsters like the Jewish Communist Bernie Sanders, the
extremely pro-Islamist Jeremy Corbyn in Enlgand, Pablo Iglesias of
Podemos in Spain, Alexis Tsipras in Greece, are supported by the unholy
alliance between the Islamic and the Communist oil cartel. See “The
Financing of Hollywood’s Socialist Propaganda”.
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2016/05/12/the-financing-of-hollywoods-
socialist-propaganda/
17. Al-Qaeda and Israel
Israel has traditionally been at the center of Al-Qaeda’s propaganda. But the
truth is that Israel is not very important for Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda is simply
using Israel to demonize the United States. In the past Al-Qaeda has attacked
some synagogues outside Israel, in order to take the credit of the war against
the Jews, but it has avoided attacks within Israel, which would need a much
greater amount of effort and money, because the Israelis spend their day
thinking about terrorism.
Remember that a large part of Al-Qaeda’s financing comes from the Saudis,
and Saudis are not interested in natural gas, because they are not as rich as
the Russians, the Iranians and the Qataris in natural gas. The Saudis
consume domestically their gas production. For the Saudis it is oil that
makes the difference. And Israel is not very important for the oil industry.
Since the 1980’s the oil pipelines started losing their geopolitical
importance, wherever there was easy access to the sea, because tankers
became much larger, and as a result the transport of oil became much
cheaper. Therefore the Saudis did not have to take suffer the terrorist attacks
of the Egyptians, the Iraqis and the Syrians against their Trans-Arabian
pipeline, which carried their oil to the Mediterranean Sea through Jordan and
Lebanon.
Map Trans-Arabian Pipeline
18. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/Tapline.png
Actually when the Israelis gained control of the Golan Heights during the
1967 War, a small part of the pipeline was under Israeli control. But of
course the Israelis did not create any problems to Saudi Arabia.
In 1976 Saudi Arabia stopped the Trans-Arabian pipeline. It only left the
part to Jordan, to have influence in Jordan. Egypt was now an American
ally, and Saudi Arabia could count on the Suez Canal. Probably the Saudis
wanted to support the Egyptians too, in order to have them as allies after
many years of rivalry between the two countries. Gamal Nasser was fighting
Saudi Arabia for decades. See “The Intra-Arab War for Oil : 1950-1970”.
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2015/06/09/the-intra-arab-oil-war-1950-1970/
Moreover in 1982 Saudi Arabia finished its East-West Pipeline (Petroline)
which sent Saudi oil to the Red Sea.
19. Map East West Petroline
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/saudi_arabia-
oil_gas_infrastructure-2014.png
Contrary to what happens with oil, it is very expensive to carry natural gas
with ships, because you need special ships, and also because the process of
liquefaction and regazification are very expensive. And that’s why from the
wars for the railroads we went to the wars for the oil pipelines in the 20th
century, and in the 21st
century we see the wars for the natural gas pipelines.
But note that when there is no easy access to sea oil pipelines are very
important too. Or when there are competing oil pipelines. What happens in
20. Syria has to do with natural gas, and what happens in Iraq has more to do
with oil.
Iran, Turkey and Qatar are very interested in natural gas pipelines, and
therefore they are more interested in Israel, and that’s why Turkey and Qatar
control Hamas (Muslim Brotherhood) in Gaza, and Iran controls Hezbollah
at the borders of Israel and Lebanon. Al-Qaeda receives a lot of Saudi
financing, and for Saudi Arabia natural gas is not important.
The presence of Hamas in Gaza and of Hezbollah in Lebanon make things
even worse for Al-Qaeda, because neither Turkey and Qatar, nor Iran, want
to see Al-Qaeda establishing a presence there. Because if Al-Qaeda was to
go there it would also claim influence over the local populations.
Therefore Israel is not financially important for Al-Qaeda, and Al-Qaeda
prefers to attack cheap targets outside Israel, like synagogues. These targets
do not cost much, and Al-Qaeda avoids problems with Hamas and
Hezbollah by not interfering in Gaza and South Lebanon.
But for Turkey, Qatar and Iran Israel is very important, and therefore Hamas
and Hezbollah spend a significant part of their day thinking about Israel, and
Israel in turn spends a significant part of its day thinking about Hezbollah
and Hamas.
21. Articles
“The Afghan Oil Pipeline and the US Negotiations with the Taliban”.
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2016/07/01/the-afghan-oil-pipeline-and-the-us-
negotiations-with-the-taliban/
“Al-Shabaab the Strongest Terrorist Organization of East Africa and its
Funding”
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2016/02/20/al-shabaab-the-strongest-terrorist-
organization-of-east-africa-and-its-funding/
“What is Al-Shabaab, and what does it want?”, July 2015
7th
Paragraph
And Al-Shabaab has links to other organizations. In February 2012, the group's leader,
Ahmed Abdi Godane, and al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahirireleased a video
announcing the alliance of the two organizations.
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/23/world/africa/what-is-al-shabaab/
“Boko Haram's Bin Laden Connection”, May 2014
1st
, 2nd
, 3rd
, 4th
, 5th
Paragraphs
In 2002, Osama bin Laden dispatched an aide to Nigeria to hand out $3 million in local
currency to a wide array of Salafist political organizations there that shared al Qaeda’s
goal of imposing Islamic rule.
According to an overlooked report from a well-respected international watchdog, one of
those organizations was Boko Haram, the terrorist outfit that’s become globally
infamous for its threat to sell girls into slavery. In other words, bin Laden helped provide
Boko Haram’s seed money, this report maintains.
22. Officially, the U.S. intelligence community assesses that the group has only tangential
links to al Qaeda’s north African affiliate, and that reports of bin Laden backing the
Nigerian outfit are off-base. But inside the secret state, many analysts believe that the
ties between Boko Haram and al Qaeda global leadership go much deeper—and are
about more than a little seed money.
“There were channels between bin laden and Boko Haram leadership,” one senior U.S.
told The Daily Beast. “He gave some strategic direction at times.”
At issue are still secret documents captured from Osama bin Laden’s lair in Pakistan in
2011. According to two senior U.S. intelligence officials, the trove of documents includes
correspondence between leaders of Boko Haram and al Qaeda’s central leadership,
including Osama bin Laden. Other U.S. intelligence officials who spoke to The Daily
Beast have stressed that the documents only include letters from Boko Haram to bin
Laden—the terror leader never replied back.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/boko-harams-bin-laden-connection-
041508136--politics.html?ref=gs
“How al-Qaeda and Islamic State are competing for al-Shabaab in Somalia”,
January 2016
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/12015075/How-
al-Qaeda-and-Islamic-State-are-fighting-for-al-Shabaab-affections-in-
Somalia.html
“The Terrorist Groups Lashkar e Taiba and Haqqani Network”
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2016/07/06/the-terrorist-groups-lashkar-e-taiba-
and-haqqani-network/
“The Life of Osama bin Laden in Iran”
https://iakal.wordpress.com/2016/07/06/the-life-of-osama-bin-laden-in-iran/