In order to maximise the benefits of regional integration and look for new opportunities for competitiveness, policymakers, the private sector and development partners need access to accurate and comprehensive data on intra and inter-regional trade in Africa with respect to agricultural goods. It is in this context that CTA and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are launching the “African Agricultural Trade Status Report”, which examines the current status, trends and outlook in African trade performance, making an important contribution towards data and analysis of developments both at regional and at continental levels. The Report, which is released in conjunction with the Briefing, builds on the work by the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) of CAADP and the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) trade and also reflects the CTA’s commitment to advancing knowledge and sharing of best practices relating to agricultural trade.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
In order to maximise the benefits of regional integration and look for new opportunities for competitiveness, policymakers, the private sector and development partners need access to accurate and comprehensive data on intra and inter-regional trade in Africa with respect to agricultural goods. It is in this context that CTA and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are launching the “African Agricultural Trade Status Report”, which examines the current status, trends and outlook in African trade performance, making an important contribution towards data and analysis of developments both at regional and at continental levels. The Report, which is released in conjunction with the Briefing, builds on the work by the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) of CAADP and the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) trade and also reflects the CTA’s commitment to advancing knowledge and sharing of best practices relating to agricultural trade.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
In order to maximise the benefits of regional integration and look for new opportunities for competitiveness, policymakers, the private sector and development partners need access to accurate and comprehensive data on intra and inter-regional trade in Africa with respect to agricultural goods. It is in this context that CTA and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are launching the “African Agricultural Trade Status Report”, which examines the current status, trends and outlook in African trade performance, making an important contribution towards data and analysis of developments both at regional and at continental levels. The Report, which is released in conjunction with the Briefing, builds on the work by the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) of CAADP and the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) trade and also reflects the CTA’s commitment to advancing knowledge and sharing of best practices relating to agricultural trade.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
In order to maximise the benefits of regional integration and look for new opportunities for competitiveness, policymakers, the private sector and development partners need access to accurate and comprehensive data on intra and inter-regional trade in Africa with respect to agricultural goods. It is in this context that CTA and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are launching the “African Agricultural Trade Status Report”, which examines the current status, trends and outlook in African trade performance, making an important contribution towards data and analysis of developments both at regional and at continental levels. The Report, which is released in conjunction with the Briefing, builds on the work by the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) of CAADP and the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) trade and also reflects the CTA’s commitment to advancing knowledge and sharing of best practices relating to agricultural trade.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
By Hans P. Binswanger-Mkhize, Derek Byerlee, Alex McCalla, Michael Morris and John Staatz. Presented at the ASTI-FARA conference Agricultural R&D: Investing in Africa's Future: Analyzing Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities - Accra, Ghana, December 5-7, 2011. http://www.asti.cgiar.org/2011conf
The Brussels Development Briefing no. 48 on “Strengthening rural livelihoods in the face of rapid urbanisation in Africa” took place on 20th March 2017 from 14:00 to 18:00, at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels, Room C). This Briefing was co-organised by CTA, BMZ/GIZ, the ACP Secretariat, European Commission (DG DEVCO) and Concord
In order to maximise the benefits of regional integration and look for new opportunities for competitiveness, policymakers, the private sector and development partners need access to accurate and comprehensive data on intra and inter-regional trade in Africa with respect to agricultural goods. It is in this context that CTA and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are launching the “African Agricultural Trade Status Report”, which examines the current status, trends and outlook in African trade performance, making an important contribution towards data and analysis of developments both at regional and at continental levels. The Report, which is released in conjunction with the Briefing, builds on the work by the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) of CAADP and the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) trade and also reflects the CTA’s commitment to advancing knowledge and sharing of best practices relating to agricultural trade.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
In order to maximise the benefits of regional integration and look for new opportunities for competitiveness, policymakers, the private sector and development partners need access to accurate and comprehensive data on intra and inter-regional trade in Africa with respect to agricultural goods. It is in this context that CTA and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are launching the “African Agricultural Trade Status Report”, which examines the current status, trends and outlook in African trade performance, making an important contribution towards data and analysis of developments both at regional and at continental levels. The Report, which is released in conjunction with the Briefing, builds on the work by the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) of CAADP and the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) trade and also reflects the CTA’s commitment to advancing knowledge and sharing of best practices relating to agricultural trade.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
In order to maximise the benefits of regional integration and look for new opportunities for competitiveness, policymakers, the private sector and development partners need access to accurate and comprehensive data on intra and inter-regional trade in Africa with respect to agricultural goods. It is in this context that CTA and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are launching the “African Agricultural Trade Status Report”, which examines the current status, trends and outlook in African trade performance, making an important contribution towards data and analysis of developments both at regional and at continental levels. The Report, which is released in conjunction with the Briefing, builds on the work by the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) of CAADP and the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) trade and also reflects the CTA’s commitment to advancing knowledge and sharing of best practices relating to agricultural trade.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
By Hans P. Binswanger-Mkhize, Derek Byerlee, Alex McCalla, Michael Morris and John Staatz. Presented at the ASTI-FARA conference Agricultural R&D: Investing in Africa's Future: Analyzing Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities - Accra, Ghana, December 5-7, 2011. http://www.asti.cgiar.org/2011conf
The Brussels Development Briefing no. 48 on “Strengthening rural livelihoods in the face of rapid urbanisation in Africa” took place on 20th March 2017 from 14:00 to 18:00, at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels, Room C). This Briefing was co-organised by CTA, BMZ/GIZ, the ACP Secretariat, European Commission (DG DEVCO) and Concord
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) co-organized an Infopoint Lunchtime conference on ''Recent trends and Outlook in African Agricultural Trade'' on 18/02/2019, from 12:30 to 14:00 at Rue de la Loi 43-45, Ground floor, Brussels.
More Info: bit.ly/2NgnsHG
The theoretical and empirical relationship between foreign trade and economic growth has extensively been discussed in economics in recent years. There has been a long held belief about the positive correlation between these two variables. In spite of this countless study, the link has been proven to be empirically weak. In view of this, the aim of this dissertation is to empirically examine the relationship between trade and growth. Using trade openness and ordinary least sequence was employed to estimate the impact of foreign trade on Gross domestic product.
"Sustaining CAADP Momentum: Growth and Investment Analysis" presented by Godfrey Bahiigwa at 10th CAADP PP Meeting Durban, South Africa March 19-21, 2014
"Annual Trends and Outlook Report 2013: Trade and Resilience" presented by Ousmane Badiane at 10th CAADP PP Meeting Durban, South Africa March 19-21, 2014
African Agricultural Futures: Opportunities, Challenges & Priorities - Dr Siwa Msangi, Research Fellow, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and AIFSC Project Coordinator for "Strategic Foresight for African Agriculture"
Presentation of the 2021 Africa Agriculture Trade Monitor, September 10, AGRF...AKADEMIYA2063
African countries have diversified both their exports and trade partners over the last decade, African agricultural trade still suffers from structural problems as well as exogenous shocks. Against this backdrop, the 2021 Africa Agriculture Trade Monitor (AATM) analyzes continental and regional trends in African agricultural trade flows and policies. The report finds that many African countries continue to enjoy the most success in global markets with cash crops and niche products. At the intra-African level, countries are becoming more interconnected in trade of key commodities, but there remain many potential but unexploited trade relationships. The report examines the livestock sector in detail, finding that despite its important role in Africa, the sector is concentrated in low value- added products that are informally traded. The report also examines trade integration in the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU), which remains limited due to factors including tariffs, nontariff measures, poor transport infrastructure, and weak institutions. Finally, the report discusses the implications of two major events affecting African trade in 2020 and 2021: the COVID-19 pandemic and the implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).
In order to maximise the benefits of regional integration and look for new opportunities for competitiveness, policymakers, the private sector and development partners need access to accurate and comprehensive data on intra and inter-regional trade in Africa with respect to agricultural goods. It is in this context that CTA and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are launching the “African Agricultural Trade Status Report”, which examines the current status, trends and outlook in African trade performance, making an important contribution towards data and analysis of developments both at regional and at continental levels. The Report, which is released in conjunction with the Briefing, builds on the work by the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) of CAADP and the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) trade and also reflects the CTA’s commitment to advancing knowledge and sharing of best practices relating to agricultural trade.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
Agrifi is a new initiative that increases investment in smallholder agriculture and agribusiness micro/ small/medium enterprises (MSMEs) to achieve inclusive and sustainable agricultural growth.
Agrifi will be launched in 2016, together with interested parties and European Financial Institutions.
A central feature of Agrifi is that the provision of EU grants will mobilise additional public and private investment. This additional investment is needed to enhance the development impact of investment projects and achieve impact at scale.
Agrifi responds to the lack of financing mechanisms adapted to farmers and agri-entrepreneurs, particularly for smallholders and agribusiness MSMEs.
Agrifi will be backed-up by a robust component of technical assistance and value chains analysis capacity, to support decision making on investment, to enhance business development and advisory services for farmers and agri-entrepreneurs and to monitor the actions for accountability purposes.
Agrifi addresses this situation by providing greater risk-bearing capacity through public money, to encourage project promoters and attract private finance to viable investments which would not have happened otherwise.
Agrifi is therefore about addressing a market failure and it finances those actions that have a clear development impact on those who would normally not be reached. This includes smallholders with limited market orientation, vulnerable farmers, women and young farmers and entrepreneurs
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) co-organized an Infopoint Lunchtime conference on ''Recent trends and Outlook in African Agricultural Trade'' on 18/02/2019, from 12:30 to 14:00 at Rue de la Loi 43-45, Ground floor, Brussels.
More Info: bit.ly/2NgnsHG
The theoretical and empirical relationship between foreign trade and economic growth has extensively been discussed in economics in recent years. There has been a long held belief about the positive correlation between these two variables. In spite of this countless study, the link has been proven to be empirically weak. In view of this, the aim of this dissertation is to empirically examine the relationship between trade and growth. Using trade openness and ordinary least sequence was employed to estimate the impact of foreign trade on Gross domestic product.
"Sustaining CAADP Momentum: Growth and Investment Analysis" presented by Godfrey Bahiigwa at 10th CAADP PP Meeting Durban, South Africa March 19-21, 2014
"Annual Trends and Outlook Report 2013: Trade and Resilience" presented by Ousmane Badiane at 10th CAADP PP Meeting Durban, South Africa March 19-21, 2014
African Agricultural Futures: Opportunities, Challenges & Priorities - Dr Siwa Msangi, Research Fellow, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and AIFSC Project Coordinator for "Strategic Foresight for African Agriculture"
Presentation of the 2021 Africa Agriculture Trade Monitor, September 10, AGRF...AKADEMIYA2063
African countries have diversified both their exports and trade partners over the last decade, African agricultural trade still suffers from structural problems as well as exogenous shocks. Against this backdrop, the 2021 Africa Agriculture Trade Monitor (AATM) analyzes continental and regional trends in African agricultural trade flows and policies. The report finds that many African countries continue to enjoy the most success in global markets with cash crops and niche products. At the intra-African level, countries are becoming more interconnected in trade of key commodities, but there remain many potential but unexploited trade relationships. The report examines the livestock sector in detail, finding that despite its important role in Africa, the sector is concentrated in low value- added products that are informally traded. The report also examines trade integration in the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU), which remains limited due to factors including tariffs, nontariff measures, poor transport infrastructure, and weak institutions. Finally, the report discusses the implications of two major events affecting African trade in 2020 and 2021: the COVID-19 pandemic and the implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).
In order to maximise the benefits of regional integration and look for new opportunities for competitiveness, policymakers, the private sector and development partners need access to accurate and comprehensive data on intra and inter-regional trade in Africa with respect to agricultural goods. It is in this context that CTA and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are launching the “African Agricultural Trade Status Report”, which examines the current status, trends and outlook in African trade performance, making an important contribution towards data and analysis of developments both at regional and at continental levels. The Report, which is released in conjunction with the Briefing, builds on the work by the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) of CAADP and the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) trade and also reflects the CTA’s commitment to advancing knowledge and sharing of best practices relating to agricultural trade.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
Agrifi is a new initiative that increases investment in smallholder agriculture and agribusiness micro/ small/medium enterprises (MSMEs) to achieve inclusive and sustainable agricultural growth.
Agrifi will be launched in 2016, together with interested parties and European Financial Institutions.
A central feature of Agrifi is that the provision of EU grants will mobilise additional public and private investment. This additional investment is needed to enhance the development impact of investment projects and achieve impact at scale.
Agrifi responds to the lack of financing mechanisms adapted to farmers and agri-entrepreneurs, particularly for smallholders and agribusiness MSMEs.
Agrifi will be backed-up by a robust component of technical assistance and value chains analysis capacity, to support decision making on investment, to enhance business development and advisory services for farmers and agri-entrepreneurs and to monitor the actions for accountability purposes.
Agrifi addresses this situation by providing greater risk-bearing capacity through public money, to encourage project promoters and attract private finance to viable investments which would not have happened otherwise.
Agrifi is therefore about addressing a market failure and it finances those actions that have a clear development impact on those who would normally not be reached. This includes smallholders with limited market orientation, vulnerable farmers, women and young farmers and entrepreneurs
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
The Brussels Development Briefing n.47 on the subject of “Regional Trade in Africa: Drivers, Trends and Opportunities” took place on 3rd February 2017 in Brussels at the ACP Secretariat (Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels) from 09:00 to 13:00. This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with IFPRI, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, and CONCORD .
The presentation was part of the Brussels Development Briefing on the topic of fish-farming, organized by the Technical Centre for Agriculture (CTA), the European Commission, and the African, Carribean, and Pacific (ACP) Secretariat on 3rd of July 2013 in Brussels.
More on: http://brusselsbriefings.net/
The Brussels Development Briefing no. 44 on “Promoting responsible and sustainable sourcing through Fair Trade” took place on 22 June 2016 from 9:00 to 13:00, at the ACP Secretariat in Brussels, Belgium.
This Briefings was co-organised by CTA, the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, CONCORD and the Fair Trade Advocacy Office.
The presentation was part of the Brussels Development Briefing on the topic of fish-farming, organized by the Technical Centre for Agriculture (CTA), the European Commission, and the African, Carribean, and Pacific (ACP) Secretariat on 3rd of July 2013 in Brussels.
More on: http://brusselsbriefings.net/
The Brussels Development Briefing n.45 on the subject of “Smart and Affordable farming solutions for Africa: the next driver for agricultural transformation” was held in Brussels at 09:00-13:00 on 13th July 2016 at the Albert Borschette Congress Center, Room 1.A (Rue Froissart 36, 1040 Brussels). This Briefing was organised by the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), in collaboration with the European Commission, the the European Commission / DEVCO, the ACP Secretariat, CONCORD, CEMA, Agricord and the PanAfrican Farmer’s Organisation (PAFO).
The presentation was part of the Brussels Development Briefing on the topic of fish-farming, organized by the Technical Centre for Agriculture (CTA), the European Commission, and the African, Carribean, and Pacific (ACP) Secretariat on 3rd of July 2013 in Brussels.
More on: http://brusselsbriefings.net/
Channing Arndt
COUNTRY WORKSHOP
The Knowledge Lab on Climate Resilient Food Systems: An analytical support facility to achieve the SDGs
Co-Organized by IFPRI and AGRA
FEB 7, 2019 - 08:30 AM TO 05:55 PM EAT
Open global trade has had positive effects for African industrialization and development. This report looks at efforts to help African countries strengthen their trading capacity and take fuller advantage of the benefits that trade brings.
The report looks into the effects of COVID-19 on Africa, the latest trends in African trade and how the WTO is providing support through the WTO-led Aid for Trade initiative and in areas such as trade facilitation, compliance with regulatory standards for trade, and technical assistance. The report also looks into projects aimed at mainstreaming trade into the national development strategies of African countries.
Keeping markets open and fostering a favourable business environment will be critical to spur renewed investment in Africa and support the continent’s economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
Ethiopia’s Manufacturing Industry Opportunities, Challenges and Way Forward: ...CrimsonpublishersNTNF
Ethiopia’s Manufacturing Industry Opportunities, Challenges and Way Forward: A Sectoral Overview by Tekeba Eshetie in Food science journal_ Nutrition and Food open access journal
THE IMPACT OF TRADE LIBERALIZATION ON ECONOMIC GROWTH; THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARA...AkashSharma618775
The main aim of this research is to explore the effect of trade liberalization on economic growth in subSaharan Africa by analyzing certain macro-economic indicators using Ordinary Least Squares approach to
estimate regression equations. Many developing countries have substantially liberalized their trade regime over the
past three decades, either unilaterally or as part of multilateral initiatives. Nevertheless, trade barriers remain
high in many developing countries. One of the concerns that attributes to the reluctance of many of these countries
to liberalize their trade regime is the possible worsening of the trade balance.
This research paper is meant to give a recommendation on which macro-economic indicators sub-Saharan African
countries should pay particular attention to, implementing the necessary policies to ensure its effectiveness thereby
ensuring a step-up in those aspects of the economy in order to promote development. It considers 46 different
countries with different economic policies in sub-Saharan Africa for a 14-year period. Most papers considering
sub-Saharan African region consider a selected few countries based on certain economic reasons of their choice,
and those who consider most countries in the region have different macroeconomic indicators they employ for their
modeling. This paper considers if not all, almost all sub-Saharan African countries regardless of their economic
status.
Bpifrance Capital Invest 2016 - L'attractivité affirmée de l'Afrique ? - Eme...Bpifrance
Retrouvez la présentation d'Aziz Mebarek (founding Partner, AfrinInvest), lors de l'événement Bpifrance Capital Invest 2016, qui s'est déroulé le 17 novembre 2016 à Paris (Salle Wagram).
Retrouvez l'intégralité de cet événement en vidéo sur :
http://live.bpifrance.fr/Bpifrance-Capital-Invest-2016
In recent times, agricultural sector has returned to the forefront of development issues in Nigeria given its contribution to employment creation, sustainable food supply and provision of raw materials to other sectors of the economy. In lieu of that, this study examines the impact of agriculture on the economic growth in Nigeria using annual time series data covering the sample period of 1981 to 2018. To analyse the data collected, Autoregression Distributed Lag (ARDL) model through the bounds testing framework is employed to measure the presence of cointegrating relations between real GDP, agricultural productivity, labour force, and agricultural export. Results show the presence of both short-run and long-run relationship among the variables, and that agriculture has a positive and significant impact on economic growth in Nigeria. These findings inform the Nigerian government on the need to expedite labour force (human capital) and agricultural export (non-oil) development with the view to achieving sustainable growth and development. In addition, developing skills and competencies of labour force through capacity building in the agricultural sector will encourage research and development thereby increase the export size, hence essential for long-term growth.
External Trade Benefits and Poverty Reduction in English Speaking West Africa...iosrjce
This research examines the impact of external trade benefits on poverty reduction in five English
Speaking West African Countries (ESWACs) from 1980 to 2013. These countries include; The Gambia, Ghana,
Liberia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone). The study expressed external trade benefits (ETB) as increase in export
earnings (EXE), trade openness (TOP), total government expenditure (TGE) and reduction in foreign exchange
rate (FER), while poverty level is expressed as real gross domestic income (GNI) per capita current US Dollar.
Theoretically, the study relied on five trade theories, in practice; the study constructs a balanced panel data
structure (BPDS) and methodologically, departs from the classical OLS and 1st generation panel econometric
techniques to adopting recently developed 2nd generation panel data econometric methods. The results of the
study reveal that external trade benefits were not found to be significant enough to reduce the poverty level in
ESWACs from 1980 to 2013.This impliesthat external trade benefits did not significantly increase GNI per
capita in ESWACs within the period of study. Based on this result, the study therefore concluded that the impact
of external trade benefits on poverty level is a trivial matter because external trade benefits have not
comprehensively and significantly augmented the status of real gross domestic income (GNI) percapital
currentUSDollar of English speaking West African countries within the period of study. Following this
conclusion we recommended, among others, that policy implication on the result of co-integration of the panel
equation 2 is that more credible expansionary fiscal policy should be pursued as this will help to pump more
money into circulation with the aim of creating and expanding employment opportunities that would be able to
reduce poverty in the region and cut in public investment spending on agriculture and industrial sectors should
be avoided so that the countries will be encouraged to produce locally and also export.
Despite major efforts made in the post-colonial era to reform trade policies in Zimbabwe in the 1990s, recent events have led to a severe retardation in Zimbabwe’s trade. The government has taken little action to try to change any of these policies in accordance to the economic disaster that the country has been experiencing for nearly a decade. This paper aims to analyze the trade policies, which were effective in boosting Zimbabwe’s economy. It will then assess the factors causing the deterioration of Zimbabwe’s trade policies, and the debt which has resulted thereof.
The least developed countries and Sustainable Development Goalsموحد مسعود
LDCs and Rural Transformation: from MDGs to SDGs
Agricultural productivity, Development of non-farm activities
The Gender Dimension, Transforming Rural Economies in the Post-2015 Era: A Policy Agenda
A presentation by Dr. Sunday Odjo, Deputy Director, Knowledge Systems Department at AKADEMIYA2063, at the 16th Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Partnership Platform (PP)
« SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA: CURRENT ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT, THE MAJOR DRIVERS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH AND THE ROLE GOVERNMENTS ARE PLAYING IN PROMOTING SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE CONTINENT »
Presented by:
H.E. Abdourahmane CISSE,
Minister to the Prime Minister in charge of the Budget
COTE D'IVOIRE
Similar to African Agricultural Trade Status Report 2017: Chapter 2. Africa global trade patterns (20)
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur « L’avenir de l’alimentation et de la transformation agricole » organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP et CONCORD s’est tenu le mercredi 26 février 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a partagé diverses perspectives sur les systèmes alimentaires durables et sains, l’avenir du travail dans l’agriculture et le besoin de nouvelles compétences dans des chaînes alimentaires très complexes, les effets des innovations, les chaînes de valeur et le commerce équitables et inclusifs.
Le public était composé de décideurs politiques des pays ACP et de l’UE, de groupes de la société civile, de réseaux de recherche et de praticiens du développement, du secteur privé et d’organisations internationales basé à Bruxelles ainsi que des représentants d’organisations régionales ACP.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur « L’avenir de l’alimentation et de la transformation agricole » organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP et CONCORD s’est tenu le mercredi 26 février 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a partagé diverses perspectives sur les systèmes alimentaires durables et sains, l’avenir du travail dans l’agriculture et le besoin de nouvelles compétences dans des chaînes alimentaires très complexes, les effets des innovations, les chaînes de valeur et le commerce équitables et inclusifs.
Le public était composé de décideurs politiques des pays ACP et de l’UE, de groupes de la société civile, de réseaux de recherche et de praticiens du développement, du secteur privé et d’organisations internationales basé à Bruxelles ainsi que des représentants d’organisations régionales ACP.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur « L’avenir de l’alimentation et de la transformation agricole » organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP et CONCORD s’est tenu le mercredi 26 février 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a partagé diverses perspectives sur les systèmes alimentaires durables et sains, l’avenir du travail dans l’agriculture et le besoin de nouvelles compétences dans des chaînes alimentaires très complexes, les effets des innovations, les chaînes de valeur et le commerce équitables et inclusifs.
Le public était composé de décideurs politiques des pays ACP et de l’UE, de groupes de la société civile, de réseaux de recherche et de praticiens du développement, du secteur privé et d’organisations internationales basé à Bruxelles ainsi que des représentants d’organisations régionales ACP.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur « L’avenir de l’alimentation et de la transformation agricole » organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP et CONCORD s’est tenu le mercredi 26 février 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a partagé diverses perspectives sur les systèmes alimentaires durables et sains, l’avenir du travail dans l’agriculture et le besoin de nouvelles compétences dans des chaînes alimentaires très complexes, les effets des innovations, les chaînes de valeur et le commerce équitables et inclusifs.
Le public était composé de décideurs politiques des pays ACP et de l’UE, de groupes de la société civile, de réseaux de recherche et de praticiens du développement, du secteur privé et d’organisations internationales basé à Bruxelles ainsi que des représentants d’organisations régionales ACP.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur « L’avenir de l’alimentation et de la transformation agricole » organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP et CONCORD s’est tenu le mercredi 26 février 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a partagé diverses perspectives sur les systèmes alimentaires durables et sains, l’avenir du travail dans l’agriculture et le besoin de nouvelles compétences dans des chaînes alimentaires très complexes, les effets des innovations, les chaînes de valeur et le commerce équitables et inclusifs.
Le public était composé de décideurs politiques des pays ACP et de l’UE, de groupes de la société civile, de réseaux de recherche et de praticiens du développement, du secteur privé et d’organisations internationales basé à Bruxelles ainsi que des représentants d’organisations régionales ACP.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.60 on “The future of food and agricultural transformation” organised by CTA, the European Commission/EuropeAid, the ACP Secretariat and CONCORD was held on Wednesday 26 February 2020 (9h00-13h00) at the ACP Secretariat, Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels.
The briefing presented trends and discussed the sustainable and healthy food systems, the future of work in agriculture and the need for new skills in very complex food chains, the effects of disruptive innovations, fair and inclusive value chains and trade.
The audience was made up of ACP-EU policy-makers and representatives of the EU Member States, civil society groups, research networks and development practitioners, the private sector and international organisations based in Brussels as well as representatives from ACP regional organisations.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.60 on “The future of food and agricultural transformation” organised by CTA, the European Commission/EuropeAid, the ACP Secretariat and CONCORD was held on Wednesday 26 February 2020 (9h00-13h00) at the ACP Secretariat, Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels.
The briefing presented trends and discussed the sustainable and healthy food systems, the future of work in agriculture and the need for new skills in very complex food chains, the effects of disruptive innovations, fair and inclusive value chains and trade.
The audience was made up of ACP-EU policy-makers and representatives of the EU Member States, civil society groups, research networks and development practitioners, the private sector and international organisations based in Brussels as well as representatives from ACP regional organisations.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.60 on “The future of food and agricultural transformation” organised by CTA, the European Commission/EuropeAid, the ACP Secretariat and CONCORD was held on Wednesday 26 February 2020 (9h00-13h00) at the ACP Secretariat, Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels.
The briefing presented trends and discussed the sustainable and healthy food systems, the future of work in agriculture and the need for new skills in very complex food chains, the effects of disruptive innovations, fair and inclusive value chains and trade.
The audience was made up of ACP-EU policy-makers and representatives of the EU Member States, civil society groups, research networks and development practitioners, the private sector and international organisations based in Brussels as well as representatives from ACP regional organisations.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.60 on “The future of food and agricultural transformation” organised by CTA, the European Commission/EuropeAid, the ACP Secretariat and CONCORD was held on Wednesday 26 February 2020 (9h00-13h00) at the ACP Secretariat, Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels.
The briefing presented trends and discussed the sustainable and healthy food systems, the future of work in agriculture and the need for new skills in very complex food chains, the effects of disruptive innovations, fair and inclusive value chains and trade.
The audience was made up of ACP-EU policy-makers and representatives of the EU Member States, civil society groups, research networks and development practitioners, the private sector and international organisations based in Brussels as well as representatives from ACP regional organisations.
The Brussels Development Briefing n.60 on “The future of food and agricultural transformation” organised by CTA, the European Commission/EuropeAid, the ACP Secretariat and CONCORD was held on Wednesday 26 February 2020 (9h00-13h00) at the ACP Secretariat, Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels.
The briefing presented trends and discussed the sustainable and healthy food systems, the future of work in agriculture and the need for new skills in very complex food chains, the effects of disruptive innovations, fair and inclusive value chains and trade.
The audience was made up of ACP-EU policy-makers and representatives of the EU Member States, civil society groups, research networks and development practitioners, the private sector and international organisations based in Brussels as well as representatives from ACP regional organisations.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur L’agroécologie au service des systèmes alimentaires durables organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP, CONCORD et IPES-FOOD s’est tenu le mercredi 15 janvier 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a examiné les concepts, tendances et perspectives des approches agroécologiques et leurs implications pour l’avenir des systèmes alimentaires. Des succès de terrain et modèles innovants d’agroécologie dans différentes parties du monde ont été présentés ainsi que les enseignements à en tirer pour les diffuser à plus grande échelle.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur L’agroécologie au service des systèmes alimentaires durables organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP, CONCORD et IPES-FOOD s’est tenu le mercredi 15 janvier 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a examiné les concepts, tendances et perspectives des approches agroécologiques et leurs implications pour l’avenir des systèmes alimentaires. Des succès de terrain et modèles innovants d’agroécologie dans différentes parties du monde ont été présentés ainsi que les enseignements à en tirer pour les diffuser à plus grande échelle.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur L’agroécologie au service des systèmes alimentaires durables organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP, CONCORD et IPES-FOOD s’est tenu le mercredi 15 janvier 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a examiné les concepts, tendances et perspectives des approches agroécologiques et leurs implications pour l’avenir des systèmes alimentaires. Des succès de terrain et modèles innovants d’agroécologie dans différentes parties du monde ont été présentés ainsi que les enseignements à en tirer pour les diffuser à plus grande échelle.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur L’agroécologie au service des systèmes alimentaires durables organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP, CONCORD et IPES-FOOD s’est tenu le mercredi 15 janvier 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a examiné les concepts, tendances et perspectives des approches agroécologiques et leurs implications pour l’avenir des systèmes alimentaires. Des succès de terrain et modèles innovants d’agroécologie dans différentes parties du monde ont été présentés ainsi que les enseignements à en tirer pour les diffuser à plus grande échelle.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur L’agroécologie au service des systèmes alimentaires durables organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP, CONCORD et IPES-FOOD s’est tenu le mercredi 15 janvier 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a examiné les concepts, tendances et perspectives des approches agroécologiques et leurs implications pour l’avenir des systèmes alimentaires. Des succès de terrain et modèles innovants d’agroécologie dans différentes parties du monde ont été présentés ainsi que les enseignements à en tirer pour les diffuser à plus grande échelle.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur L’agroécologie au service des systèmes alimentaires durables organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP, CONCORD et IPES-FOOD s’est tenu le mercredi 15 janvier 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a examiné les concepts, tendances et perspectives des approches agroécologiques et leurs implications pour l’avenir des systèmes alimentaires. Des succès de terrain et modèles innovants d’agroécologie dans différentes parties du monde ont été présentés ainsi que les enseignements à en tirer pour les diffuser à plus grande échelle.
Le Briefing de Bruxelles sur L’agroécologie au service des systèmes alimentaires durables organisé par le CTA, la Commission européenne/EuropeAid, le Secrétariat ACP, CONCORD et IPES-FOOD s’est tenu le mercredi 15 janvier 2020 de 9h00 à 13h00 au Secrétariat ACP, 451 Avenue Georges Henri, 1200 Bruxelles, Salle C.
Ce briefing a examiné les concepts, tendances et perspectives des approches agroécologiques et leurs implications pour l’avenir des systèmes alimentaires. Des succès de terrain et modèles innovants d’agroécologie dans différentes parties du monde ont été présentés ainsi que les enseignements à en tirer pour les diffuser à plus grande échelle.
The Brussels Development Briefing n. 59 on “Agroecology for Sustainable Food Systems” organised by CTA, the European Commission/EuropeAid, the ACP Secretariat, CONCORD and IPES-FOOD was held on Wednesday 15 January 2020 (9h00-13h00) at the ACP Secretariat, Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels.
The briefing brought various perspectives and experiences on agroecological systems to support agricultural transformation. Experts presented trends and prospects for agroecological approaches and what it implies for the future of the food systems. Successes and innovative models in agroecology in different parts of the world and the lessons learned for upscaling them were also discussed.
The Brussels Development Briefing n. 59 on “Agroecology for Sustainable Food Systems” organised by CTA, the European Commission/EuropeAid, the ACP Secretariat, CONCORD and IPES-FOOD was held on Wednesday 15 January 2020 (9h00-13h00) at the ACP Secretariat, Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels.
The briefing brought various perspectives and experiences on agroecological systems to support agricultural transformation. Experts presented trends and prospects for agroecological approaches and what it implies for the future of the food systems. Successes and innovative models in agroecology in different parts of the world and the lessons learned for upscaling them were also discussed.
The Brussels Development Briefing n. 59 on “Agroecology for Sustainable Food Systems” organised by CTA, the European Commission/EuropeAid, the ACP Secretariat, CONCORD and IPES-FOOD was held on Wednesday 15 January 2020 (9h00-13h00) at the ACP Secretariat, Avenue Georges Henri 451, 1200 Brussels.
The briefing brought various perspectives and experiences on agroecological systems to support agricultural transformation. Experts presented trends and prospects for agroecological approaches and what it implies for the future of the food systems. Successes and innovative models in agroecology in different parts of the world and the lessons learned for upscaling them were also discussed.
More from Brussels Briefings (brusselsbriefings.net) (20)
Techniques to optimize the pagerank algorithm usually fall in two categories. One is to try reducing the work per iteration, and the other is to try reducing the number of iterations. These goals are often at odds with one another. Skipping computation on vertices which have already converged has the potential to save iteration time. Skipping in-identical vertices, with the same in-links, helps reduce duplicate computations and thus could help reduce iteration time. Road networks often have chains which can be short-circuited before pagerank computation to improve performance. Final ranks of chain nodes can be easily calculated. This could reduce both the iteration time, and the number of iterations. If a graph has no dangling nodes, pagerank of each strongly connected component can be computed in topological order. This could help reduce the iteration time, no. of iterations, and also enable multi-iteration concurrency in pagerank computation. The combination of all of the above methods is the STICD algorithm. [sticd] For dynamic graphs, unchanged components whose ranks are unaffected can be skipped altogether.
As Europe's leading economic powerhouse and the fourth-largest hashtag#economy globally, Germany stands at the forefront of innovation and industrial might. Renowned for its precision engineering and high-tech sectors, Germany's economic structure is heavily supported by a robust service industry, accounting for approximately 68% of its GDP. This economic clout and strategic geopolitical stance position Germany as a focal point in the global cyber threat landscape.
In the face of escalating global tensions, particularly those emanating from geopolitical disputes with nations like hashtag#Russia and hashtag#China, hashtag#Germany has witnessed a significant uptick in targeted cyber operations. Our analysis indicates a marked increase in hashtag#cyberattack sophistication aimed at critical infrastructure and key industrial sectors. These attacks range from ransomware campaigns to hashtag#AdvancedPersistentThreats (hashtag#APTs), threatening national security and business integrity.
🔑 Key findings include:
🔍 Increased frequency and complexity of cyber threats.
🔍 Escalation of state-sponsored and criminally motivated cyber operations.
🔍 Active dark web exchanges of malicious tools and tactics.
Our comprehensive report delves into these challenges, using a blend of open-source and proprietary data collection techniques. By monitoring activity on critical networks and analyzing attack patterns, our team provides a detailed overview of the threats facing German entities.
This report aims to equip stakeholders across public and private sectors with the knowledge to enhance their defensive strategies, reduce exposure to cyber risks, and reinforce Germany's resilience against cyber threats.
Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation - Final Version - 5.23...John Andrews
SlideShare Description for "Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation"
Title: Chatty Kathy: Enhancing Physical Activity Among Older Adults
Description:
Discover how Chatty Kathy, an innovative project developed at the UNC Bootcamp, aims to tackle the challenge of low physical activity among older adults. Our AI-driven solution uses peer interaction to boost and sustain exercise levels, significantly improving health outcomes. This presentation covers our problem statement, the rationale behind Chatty Kathy, synthetic data and persona creation, model performance metrics, a visual demonstration of the project, and potential future developments. Join us for an insightful Q&A session to explore the potential of this groundbreaking project.
Project Team: Jay Requarth, Jana Avery, John Andrews, Dr. Dick Davis II, Nee Buntoum, Nam Yeongjin & Mat Nicholas
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptxOpendatabay
Opendatabay.com unlocks the power of data for everyone. Open Data Marketplace fosters a collaborative hub for data enthusiasts to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets.
First ever open hub for data enthusiasts to collaborate and innovate. A platform to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets. Through robust quality control and innovative technologies like blockchain verification, opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of datasets, empowering users to make data-driven decisions with confidence. Leverage cutting-edge AI technologies to enhance the data exploration, analysis, and discovery experience.
From intelligent search and recommendations to automated data productisation and quotation, Opendatabay AI-driven features streamline the data workflow. Finding the data you need shouldn't be a complex. Opendatabay simplifies the data acquisition process with an intuitive interface and robust search tools. Effortlessly explore, discover, and access the data you need, allowing you to focus on extracting valuable insights. Opendatabay breaks new ground with a dedicated, AI-generated, synthetic datasets.
Leverage these privacy-preserving datasets for training and testing AI models without compromising sensitive information. Opendatabay prioritizes transparency by providing detailed metadata, provenance information, and usage guidelines for each dataset, ensuring users have a comprehensive understanding of the data they're working with. By leveraging a powerful combination of distributed ledger technology and rigorous third-party audits Opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of every dataset. Security is at the core of Opendatabay. Marketplace implements stringent security measures, including encryption, access controls, and regular vulnerability assessments, to safeguard your data and protect your privacy.
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
Explore our comprehensive data analysis project presentation on predicting product ad campaign performance. Learn how data-driven insights can optimize your marketing strategies and enhance campaign effectiveness. Perfect for professionals and students looking to understand the power of data analysis in advertising. for more details visit: https://bostoninstituteofanalytics.org/data-science-and-artificial-intelligence/
African Agricultural Trade Status Report 2017: Chapter 2. Africa global trade patterns
1. Chapter 2. Africa global trade
patterns
Extracted from
African Agricultural
Trade Status Report
2017
2. 7
CHAPTER 2. AFRICA GLOBAL TRADE PATTERNS
Fousseini Traore IFPRI- Markets, Trade and Institutions Division, Regional Office for West and
Central Africa, Dakar, Senegal
Daniel Sakyi, Department of Economics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and
Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana
2.1 Introduction
The trade performance of African countries has improved in recent years, though it is still below
expectations when compared to other regions of the world. This notwithstanding, and although the
region is currently considered as one of the fastest growing regions in the world, Africa’s trade
performance continues to be dominated by the agricultural sector. Overall, Africa’s
competitiveness has slightly improved and the trends in its exports have undergone major
diversification since 1998. This has become possible due to the region’s (i) participation in
multilateral and bilateral talks (WTO-DDA; EPAs, etc.), (ii) benefits received from preferential
trade agreements (AGOA, EBA, etc.), and (iii) deeper regional integration (FTAs, customs unions,
etc.). In addition, technological transfer from developed countries to the region has contributed
significantly to transformation of the agricultural sector and trade.
Although the agriculture sector still remains key with the potential to be an important player in
global food markets and continues to play a significant role in terms of value-added (NEPAD,
2015)1
, the share of agricultural exports in total exports has declined since 1998. This has remained
so because the sector is still characterized by low productivity, which tends to pose a major setback
to Africa’s economic development and structural transformation. This presents critical challenges
for Africa given the continent’s rich natural resource endowments and its potential to transform
and export high valued agricultural products both within the continent and abroad. It is, therefore,
not surprising that the need to develop and transform the agricultural sector in Africa was heavily
discussed in the 2014 Malabo Declaration, as this was crucial to accelerate Africa’s development
campaign. Therefore, the commitment to boosting intra-African trade in agricultural commodities
and services (i.e. to triple, by the year 2025, intra-African trade in agricultural commodities and
services) is seen as key to growth because its expansion will trickle down to other sectors of the
region’s economy.
1
In fact, agriculture accounts for a significant portion of GDP in Africa (about 20% in 2015 (World Bank, 2015)),
and therefore presents considerable potential for supporting broader growth and the eradication of poverty and hunger.
3. 8
In recent years the trends in international trade were largely driven by the sluggish economic
growth and the persisting economic and political turmoil in various parts of the world; from 2011
to 2014 world trade grew at a rate of less than 2 percent per year, due to generally lower economic
growth but also because trade has been much less responsive to output growth. This was
particularly the case for Africa (UNCTAD, 2015). Regarding agricultural products, while world
agricultural exports grew annually at 7% between 2010 and 2014, Africa’s exports grew at 5%,
highlighting more resistance for agricultural trade compared to trade in manufactures which grew
at 4% (WTO, 2015).
African agricultural export shares in global trade have increased steadily between 1998 and 2013,
with a diverging pattern among the main Regional Economic Communities (RECs). The ECCAS
and SADC regions registered a relative decline, while COMESA showed stability and ECOWAS
is characterised by huge short run volatility. However, the region’s imports still remain higher than
its exports in value terms, yielding a growing trade deficit. The main drivers of this surge in imports
are rapid population growth and urbanisation, income changes due to economic growth, and
changes in dietary patterns. Among the RECs, the SADC region is the only one registering a
consistent trade surplus over the last decade.
One noticeable feature is the direction of Africa’s trade to and from the European market that has
constantly showed a downward trend, while trade with regional partners and Asian countries keeps
rising. Africa also registered a decrease in the concentration of its exports over the last decade.
Another interesting feature is the relative decline of the share of agricultural exports in Africa’s
total exports, indicating that the main source of foreign earnings come now from non-agricultural
products. However, overall, despite the region’s attempt to integrate into the global market, there
is still some work to be done in increasing diversification, in furthering integration into global
value chains and in meeting international standards.
This chapter examines Africa’s global trade patterns from 1998 to 2013. Specifically, section II
highlights the trends of Africa’s agricultural trade both in values and in volumes with a focus on
the evolution of some key agricultural commodities. This is followed by a discussion of trends in
net agricultural exports in section III. Changes in market shares are presented under section IV;
this section also analyses in detail the direction of African’s exports and imports. Since the region’s
export and import composition changes over time, the composition of agricultural exports and
4. 9
imports is also discussed under section V. We then examine under section VI the changes in unit
values of agricultural exports and imports. Finally, the last section concludes the chapter.
2.2 Trends in volumes and values of global agricultural trade (exports and imports)2
2.2.1 Global patterns
Fig. 2.1. Total agricultural trade, billion USD Fig. 2.2. Export shares in global agricultural
(nominal values) exports (nominal values)
Source: BACI Source: BACI
Globally, agricultural exports and imports have been increasing steadily since 1998 even though
imports have been generally higher than exports (Figure 2.1). After a fall in the nineties, Africa’s
exports have increased continuously over the last decade at 8% annually. Over the entire period
(1998–2013) exports more than doubled.
From 2008 to 2013 (the post crisis period), the annual growth rate of agricultural exports was 6.6%
which is much higher than total export growth (1.3%) due to sluggish economic growth in the
world (UNCTAD, 2015). Although the trend looks promising, exports still lagged behind imports.
The reasons behind this increase in exports include price booms of various commodities over the
last decade, the improvement in infrastructure in the continent (mostly transport and
telecommunication), economic growth, and more regional and global integration efforts.
2
Unless specified, all figures refer to aggregate continental trade, i.e. extra and intra Africa trade lumped together. The main source
of data is the BACI database built by CEPII. Based on UN COMTRADE, BACI has developed a procedure to reconcile exporter
and importer declarations using both mirror data and gravity modeling (Gaulier et al., 2010). This allows a significant increase in
the number of countries with available data. See the appendix for a complete description of the database.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Exports Imports
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Africa SSA
5. 10
While export growth has not been as high as expected, in contrast, the value of agricultural imports
has increased rapidly during the years since 1998. Over the entire period, imports have grown
fivefold. Specifically, there was a general rise in the value of agricultural imports from $19.07
billion in 1998 to approximately $68.28 billion in 2008 with a dip in 2009 ($60.61 billion). Total
trade in agricultural imports increased again between 2009 and 2011, peaking at approximately $
98.89 billion. However, since 2012, world agricultural imports have been slightly on the decline,
with the total value of world agricultural imports dropping to approximately $89.18 billion in 2013.
On the other hand, and as earlier indicated, exports have been rising over the period, with the 2013
value of approximately $63.85 billion being the highest for the period.
The higher imports may be attributed to both demand and supply factors. On the demand side, the
main elements to mention are the increasing income levels due to higher economic growth,
population growth and demographic changes, and changes in consumers’ dietary patterns
(Rakotoarisoa et al., 2011; Diao et al. 2008). The income effect due to economic growth is at play
in some countries like Ghana and Mozambique with consequences for dietary patterns. For
instance, with higher incomes, consumers demand more protein (such as meat, fish, milk, and
peanut). The other cause of increasing imports is population growth and rapid urbanization in
Africa with a concomitant increase of the population in rural areas. Africa is indeed the most
dynamic region in terms of demographics. Africa’s population has more than doubled in the last
30 years while the world’s population has grown by 60% with now two out of every five people
living in cities. The consequence of the rapid urbanization and population growth has been an
increase in the consumption of more diversified and richer animal products and in the consumption
of imported cereals (wheat, rice, and maize) rather than of the local cereals, roots, and tubers
generally consumed in rural areas (FAO, 2015). This trend will continue in the near future as
Africa’s population growth rate is twice the world average. On the supply side, the huge increase
in imports is mainly due to the poor performance in terms of competitiveness of African
agriculture, which has been unable to meet the requirements of the growing population. Low and
stagnating agricultural productivity, water constraints, the low use of fertilizers and low
mechanization are the key factors at play (FAO, 2015).
Export shares of Africa and SSA in global exports are given in Figure 2.2. The shares of Africa
and SSA’s exports in world exports have been fluctuating below 4% with a few exceptions, the
lowest share being 3.77% in 2008. The export shares of SSA countries in global exports have
6. 11
experienced trends similar to those of Africa as a whole, with respect to the years of peaks and
troughs, meaning that North African countries do not account significantly for the region’s
agricultural exports. It is obvious from the trends given in Figure 2.2 that export shares of both
Africa and SSA in world agricultural trade are generally low. The contrasted evolution of Africa’s
share in global exports is reflected by the evolution of its competitiveness in world markets. Indeed
two third of the countries of the continent registered a loss in competitiveness while the remaining
ones managed to expand their exports in world markets faster than their competitors (Odjo and
Badiane, 2017).
The low share of Africa in world agricultural trade is to be contrasted with the facts that agriculture
products continue to contribute highly to GDP in most African countries and that agriculture
employs a large proportion of its workforce (WDI, 2015). The situation may however be explained
by the fact that compared to other countries or regions, agricultural production in Africa is largely
on a “peasant” scale (Bryceson, 2015; Collier and Dercon, 2014), making the overall share of
agricultural exports from Africa and SSA relatively lower. However the share of Africa’s
agricultural exports in world agricultural exports is slightly greater than the share of its
merchandise exports in global merchandise exports (Figure 2.2 versus Figure 2.3), showing the
relative specialization of Africa in agricultural products. Another interesting feature is the relative
decline of the share of agricultural exports in Africa’s total exports (Figure 2.4). Indeed the share
of agricultural products has been reduced by half since 1998, indicating a symmetric increase in
export earnings from other sources (mainly textiles, minerals and fossil oil). Agricultural exports
represent now 10% of Africa’s total exports.
7. 12
Fig. 2.3. Share of Africa in world total trade3
Fig. 2.4. Share of agricultural exports in
(nominal values) total exports (nominal values)
Source: UNCTAD Source: BACI
Globally, the evolution of the market shares of the main RECs follow that of Africa as a whole
(Figure 2.5). The evolution in some groups is however more pronounced than for others. The
ECCAS group, which has the lowest share, is also characterized by a secular decline over the entire
period. This particular pattern of the SADC region is confirmed by its lack of competitiveness over
the last decade compared to its main competitors (Odjo and Badiane, 2017; see chapter 4). The
SADC region is also an example of a relative decline over the period after an increase of its market
share in the late nineties, with a decline in competitiveness. The ECOWAS region’s market share
is the most volatile one, with an improvement in the most recent years, while COMESA’s is
relatively stable over time. The divergent evolution of the market shares of the different RECs is
due to their differences in terms of specialization (commodities exported; see Annex 2) and to their
ability to respond to price booms and to compete with other exporters in global markets.
3
Goods and services
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
18.00%
20.00%
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
8. 13
Figure 2.5. Exports shares of agricultural products by major RECs
Source: BACI
2.2.2. Evolution of some key exported commodities
This subsection focuses on some key commodities, particularly citrus, coffee, cocoa and cotton
(the main commodities exported in 1998) and fish and related products that are not part of the
WTO agreement on agriculture.
As evident in Figure 2.64
, although citrus was the second most exported commodity in volume
terms after cocoa between 1998 and 2002, it outstripped the volume of cocoa exported from 2002
to 2013. Notwithstanding, cocoa remains the highest exported commodity in value (see Figure 2.7)
from 1998 to 2013, with the value of citrus, coffee and cotton all performing below that of cocoa
in the same period.
Globally, the price of cocoa and coffee in US$ per kilogram have grown continually since 2000
(see Figure 2.8). However, with the exception of the period 2001 to 2004, the coffee price grew
more rapidly than the cocoa price. Also cotton price (see Figure 2.9) maintained a relatively stable
growth rate between 2000 and 2009. By the year 2011, the price of cotton had more than doubled
from the price in 2000, though the highest price in 2011 did not last for the subsequent years.
4 Figure 2.6 illustrates the evolution of major agricultural exported commodities in millions of tons: citrus, coffee,
cocoa and cotton.
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
1.40%
1.60%
1.80%
1998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013
ECOWAS ECCAS COMESA SADC
9. 14
What is interesting is the imperfect and even opposite correlation between the volume of exports
and world prices at the end of the period with the exception of cocoa (Figures 2.6 and 2.8). Indeed
despite the huge drop in the world prices of cotton and coffee, export volumes continue to rise
after 2011. This may be due to an imperfect transmission of international price shocks to local
producers’ prices (due to stabilization mechanisms at play, exchange rate movements between
USD and local currencies, etc.) but also to an income effect which pushes producers to supply
more when prices fall (i.e., negative supply elasticity; see Yotopoulos and Lau, 1974).
Fig. 2.6. Export volume of key commodities Fig. 2.7. Export value of key commodities
(Millions of tons) (Millions of USD)
Source: BACI Source: BACI
Fig. 2.8. Cocoa and coffee prices in US$/KG Fig. 2.9. Cotton (Cotlook A index cents/lb)
Source: World Bank Source: NCC
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Citrus Coffee Cocoa Cotton
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Citrus Coffee Cocoa Cotton
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Cocoa Coffee
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
10. 15
Fish and related products
Fish and related products represent a huge share of agricultural (extra-regional) exports for some
countries (such as Senegal) but are not part of the WTO agreement on agriculture. It is therefore
important to include them in the analysis. From 1998 to 2013, fish exports represented on average
15% of total agricultural exports.
Africa and SSA’s exports of fish and related products have doubled between 1998 and 2013,
increasing from $3.12 billion dollars and $2.29 billion dollars respectively to $7.17 billion and
$4.98 billion dollars (see Figure 2.10). For both Africa and SSA, exports of fish and related
products generally increased continuously from 1998-2008, fell between 2008 and 2010, and
increased again between 2010 and 2013.
Trends in the share of Africa and SSA in global fish trade have been similar for 1998-2013 (see
Figure 2.11). It is worth noting that Africa’s share in global fish exports is higher than its average
share in agricultural product exports, indicating a greater role and potential in that particular
market.
Fig. 2.10. Evolution of export value in USD millions Fig. 2.11. Share in global fish trade
Source: BACI Source: BACI
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Africa SSA
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Africa SSA
11. 16
2.3 Trends in net agricultural exports
Since the early nineteen eighties, Africa’s agricultural exports have continued to lag behind its
imports. The agricultural trade deficit has therefore continued to dominate as the region recorded
a negative value in its net exports between 2001 and 2013 (see Figure 2.12). This pattern is also
confirmed by the normalized trade balance5
(see Figure 2.13). The main contributor to the trade
deficit is the America region (both North America and Latin America) with –US$4 billion in 2001,
–US$7 billion in 2005 and –US$18 billion in 2013. The EU and Asia regions recorded a surplus
of US$3.3 billion and US$0.9 billion respectively in 2001. Net agricultural exports to the global
market have worsened since, as Africa started recording deficits with both Asia and the EU in
addition to the America region. The lowest ever deficit recorded occurred in 2011 (US$39.7 billion
globally). In that same year, Africa recorded a negative value of US$8.3 million to Asia, US$1.6
million to the EU and US$25.3 billion to America. Although the deficit recorded in net agricultural
exports reduced somewhat, evidence for 2013 shows that net agricultural exports by African
countries have not been encouraging. Also, globally the deficit is mainly due to significant
increases in imports rather than a decrease in exports. The main import commodities causing the
deficit are sugar, maize, and wheat from the America region; wheat, milk and cream from the EU;
and rice, palm oil and wheat from Asia.
It appears that most of the RECs recorded a trade deficit over the period with the exception of the
SADC region which recorded a surplus over the entire period (see Annex 2). The trade deficit is
particularly important for North African countries, which are huge cereal importers. According to
recent studies, 23 countries in Africa are highly import dependent, with normalized trade balance
index values between -1 to -0.1 while 37 countries are net importers of food (FAO, 2015).
The growing agricultural trade deficit suggests that it is necessary that African countries take
relevant steps to improve export performance since the continent has the “agrarian” environment
to support agricultural exports. Agriculture on the continent must gradually be transformed from
being peasant-dominated to a more commercial type as doing so in addition to other measures
(such as improvement in technology and skills) will greatly improve agricultural exports.
5
The normalized balance is computed as a country's exports of agricultural products minus its imports of agricultural
products, normalized by dividing it by its agricultural trade (imports plus exports). The index varies between -1 and
1.
12. 17
Figure 2.12. Evolution of net agricultural exports in US$ million (nominal values)
Source: BACI
Figure 2.13. Normalized trade balance
Source: BACI
2.4 Directions of agricultural exports and imports and changes in market shares
This section assesses the direction of Africa’s agricultural exports and imports as well as the
changes in Africa’s market shares in these regions. Africa as a region has been noted for its natural
resource abundance and a significant share of its exports are agricultural products, either semi
processed or in their raw state. Different types of exports are made by Africa to different regions
in the world. However, the most common agricultural export commodities are cash crops. In
particular, commodities such as cotton, cocoa, coffee, cassava, and sorghum are exported to other
parts of the world. The direction of these exports however depends on the demand for such
-30000
-25000
-20000
-15000
-10000
-5000
0
5000
10000
2001 2005 2013
World EU Asia America
-0.3
-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
13. 18
products. In Figures 2.14 and 2.15, we present the direction of Africa’s agricultural exports from
1998 to 2013 to four regions: among African countries; Europe; Asia; and America. As shown in
Figure 2.15, thanks to free trade areas and improvement in local infrastructure, the rate at which
African countries export to each other has increased at a constant rate since 1998. This outcome is
however still low when compared to other regions outside Africa. The direction of exports among
African countries have averaged 15.70% between 1998 and 2012 in spite of the low take off rate
of 11% in 1998.
Exports to Europe have shown a downward trend since 1998, yet Europe remains the region’s
highest export destination. Consistently, Africa’s exports to the EU dropped from 62% of total
agricultural exports in 1998 to 37% in 2012. Some African countries started developing tropical
products for export to the EU market, to take advantage of the preferences granted by the EU (EBA
for instance), but EU standards and SPS dampen the level of agricultural exports (Otsuki and
Sewadeh, 2001; Kareem, 2014). It is also worth noting that the EU started negotiations with some
of Africa’s competitors such as Asia and Latin America, the risk being the erosion of preferences
for African countries for some commodities such as cocoa and bananas. Exports to Asia (and
Europe) are mostly agricultural products that are high-value and low-calorie in nature. Notable
among them are cotton, coffee, flowers, fruits, tea, tobacco and fish. As evident in Figure 2.15,
exports of agricultural products to Asia increased at a slower rate between 1998 and 2012 while
exports to America have been fairly low. Until 2012, the share of exports to America was below
9%. The highest export share to America since 1998 was recorded to be 9.69% which occurred in
2012. This reduced to 5.63% in 2013 (see Figure 2.14). Europe, on the other hand, received the
highest share of Africa’s exports (37.52%) in 2013 (see Figure 2.14) followed by Asia and Africa.
On the import side, as shown in Figure 2.16, the region imported 12.51% in 1999 from its own
area. This increased to 16% in 2003 and dropped to 12.37% in 2008. However these low figures
do not account for informal cross-border trade between African countries. This consists of flows
of local products and of import/re-export flows, sometimes in order to circumvent protectionist
policies put in place by some countries against imports from the international market (see the
Nigeria-Benin case, LARES, 2005; Golub, 2012). Since estimates of intra-regional trade volumes
are based on official statistics (customs declarations), the volume of trade is largely
underestimated. For instance, more than 50% of Benin’s trade in red meat, cattle and cereals was
informal in 2010 (ECNE, 2010). However some obstacles still remain for intra-African trade.
14. 19
Among these are mentioned inadequate transport, storage and preservation infrastructure; tariffs,
non-tariff barriers and export bans; technical barriers; customs procedures; lack of harmonisation
of procedures and documents; lack of recognition of national certificates and standards; migratory
procedures; and roadside inspections (Levard and Benkhala, 2013; Rolland and Alpha, 2011).
Finally the share of intra-trade varies among commodities: cereals and live animals are the most
intra-exported while coffee, cocoa, and tea are mostly exported outside the continent.
The majority of Africa’s imports come from Europe. It is evident from Figure 2.16 that in 1998
42% of the region’s imports came from EU. Though the percentage of imports from the EU has
reduced since 1998, the EU still remains Africa’s largest origin of imports. Currently, imports from
America have been rising steadily; between 1998 and 2003, the share of imports from this region
averaged 26.62%. Moreover, the highest imports to Africa in 2011 came from America. Inside
America there is a sharp drop in imports from North America which benefited Latin America. The
share of imports from Asia has also increased from 11.30% in 1998 to 26.42% in 2012. This,
however, dropped in 2013 to 24.78%. The main feature here is the decline of Europe and the rise
of Asia over the period as Africa’s trade partner both for imports and exports.
Figure 2.14. Direction of agricultural exports and imports in 2013
Exports (nominal values) Imports (nominal values)
Source: BACI Source: BACI
20.14%
37.52%
31.71%
5.63% 5.00%
Africa EU Asia America Others
14.42%
27.98%
24.78%
24.29%
8.53%
Africa EU Asia America Others
15. 20
Fig. 2.15. Directions of agricultural exports Fig. 2.16. Directions of agricultural imports
(nominal values) (nominal values)
Source: BACI Source: BACI
2.5 Changes in composition of agricultural exports and imports
The composition of agricultural exports and imports in Africa recorded mixed features over time.
It shows an increasing diversification of exports and a relative stability for imports, with slight
modifications from period to period.
It is widely recognized that African exports are highly concentrated (Kose and Riezman, 2001;
Songwe and Winkler, 2012). However, within the agricultural sector, Africa’s exports seems to
have started a gradual diversification as the composition and the shares of the region’s exports
changed over time. We report in Figures 2.17 and 2.18 the top ten exported products from Africa.
In 1998 the top 10 (HS4) products represented 57% of exports while in 2013 they represented
43%, indicating a decrease in the concentration of exports. However, 6 out of 10 products present
in 1998 were also present in 2013. By the end of the year 1998, cocoa beans were the region’s top
exported agricultural product. This is still the case in 2013 with 14% of total agricultural exports.
Coffee and cotton emerged as the second and third most exported products in that same year
(1998), amounting to US$2 billion and US$1.5 billion, respectively. Among others, sugar, tobacco,
tea, citrus fruits, grapes and apples were also among the top ten exported agricultural products in
1998. The region has since 1998 witnessed a drop in the export of cotton, citrus fruits and tobacco.
Conversely, cigars and cigarettes, oilseeds and frozen fish, which were absent from the list of top
exports in 1998, are now among the top ten products exported in 2013.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Africa EU Asia
America Others
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Africa EU Asia
America Others
16. 21
Exports.
Fig. 2.17. Top ten products in 1998 Fig. 2.18. Top ten products in 2013
(in % of total agricultural export value) (in % of total agricultural export value)
Source: BACI Source: BACI
Unlike exports, Africa’s imports have remained quite stable in terms of composition and shares.
In 1998 the top 10 (HS4) products represented 52% of imports against 49% in 2013. As evident
from Figures 2.19 and 2.20, 8 out of the top 10 commodities imported in 1998 are also present in
2013. In Figure 2.19, the highest share of Africa’s agricultural imports is held by wheat and meslin
flour, which constituted about 16% of agricultural imports in 1998. Sugar was the second most
imported product, representing 8.28% of agricultural products imported by African countries. The
other products that were among the top ten imported products include maize, rice, wheat and
meslin flour, soya-bean oil, palm oil, sunflower-seed, and cigars and cigarettes. In 2013, wheat
and meslin continued to account for the highest share of agricultural imports. Rice is the second
most imported agricultural product followed by sugar, palm oil, and milk and cream. Meat and
edible offal of poultry, soya-bean oil and oil-cake and other solid residues are among the products
imported in 2013. The entry of meat and edible offal in the top 10 imported commodities highlights
the shift towards more protein-related products mentioned earlier.
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
17. 22
Imports.
Fig. 2.19. Top ten imported products in 1998 Fig. 2.20. Top ten imported products in 2013
(in %of total agricultural imports) (in % of total agricultural imports)
Source: BACI Source: BACI
2.6 Changes in unit values of agricultural exports and imports
A plot of trends in the evolution of agricultural imports and exports unit values is given in Figure
2.21. It shows changes in unit values of agricultural imports and exports using 2000 as the base
year. The evolution of unit values is related to the so-called (deterioration of) terms of trade
literature which dates back to the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis (Prebisch, 1950; Singer, 1950) that
argues that the price of primary commodities declines relative to the price of manufactured goods
over the long run, causing the terms of trade to deteriorate for primary products exporting and
manufactured goods importing countries. However recent research regarding this topic has given
mixed results (Arezki et al. 2013).
From Figure 2.21, it can be seen that the unit value of both agricultural imports and exports have
generally increased for the 2000–2013 period with a mixed pattern. From 2000 to 2007, the
evolution of both indicators shows a significant increase, with imports rising faster than exports,
yielding a slight deterioration of the agricultural terms of trade. The period between 2008 and 2013
saw the evolution of the unit value of exports outstripping the unit value of Africa’s imports. This
improvement was mainly due to the huge increase in commodity prices in the late 2000s and is in
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
18.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
18. 23
line with the evolution global terms of trade for Africa (UNCTAD, 2015) though more important
here than that of total trade6
.
Figure 2.21. Evolution of exports and imports unit values (Base 100=2000)
Source: BACI
2.7 Conclusion
Africa has experienced a significant increase in both the value of its exports and imports over the
last decade, boosted by the increase in commodity prices in international markets. However, since
1998, Africa’s imports have increased more rapidly both in shares and in value terms than exports,
yielding a continuously deteriorating trade deficit. This growing trade deficit driven by imports is
mainly due to population and economic growth, change in dietary patterns, increasing income
levels and the lack of competiveness of the domestic sector. Among the main RECs of the
continent, the SADC region is the only one recording a surplus over the entire period.
Africa’s share of global trade in agriculture has been stable around 4%, though with some small
fluctuations for the last three years. The evolution of the market shares of the main RECs shows a
regular decline of the shares of the ECCAS and the SADC region, a relative stability of
COMESA’s share and a highly volatile pattern for ECOWAS. One of the main interesting features
is the secular decline of the share of agricultural exports in Africa’s total exports. The share of
agricultural exports in Africa’s total exports has been cut by half since 1998 to the benefit of
mineral and fossil oils.
6
This is due to mineral products that are not taken into account here.
0
50
100
150
200
Exports Imports
19. 24
The composition of agricultural exports and imports in Africa recorded mixed features, showing
an increasing diversification for exports and a relative stability for imports. Indeed, within the
agricultural sector, Africa’s exports seem to have started a gradual diversification. Now the top ten
(HS4) exported products represent 43% of exports compared to 57% in 1998. However, most of
the products present in the top exported commodities in 1998 are still present, with a concentration
of cocoa beans, coffee and cotton. Unlike exports, Africa’s imports have remained quite stable in
terms of composition and shares, with the top ten (HS4) products still representing half the imports.
Imports remain dominated by cereals (wheat, rice, maize) and sugar, with a recent shift towards
more protein (meat and offal and fish).
In terms of directions of trade, Africa’s trade (both imports and exports) with the European market
has witnessed a continuous drop since 2000, though the EU still remains the first partner for the
continent. At the same time, Asia has emerged as a major partner for both imports and exports. If
recent trends were to continue, Asia will soon become Africa’s first trade partner. It is worth noting
that the ability to meet standards and SPS measures is still dampening Africa’s exports, in
particular to the EU and the US markets. There is also a risk of the erosion of preferences for some
African countries as the EU for instance has ongoing negotiations with some of Africa’s
competitors such as Asia and Latin America, the main sectors at risk being those of cocoa beans
and bananas.
African countries have also expanded their intra-trade over the last 10 years and become less
dependent on international markets. In particular, the share of agricultural imports and exports
among African countries more than doubled between 2000 and 2013. Recent improvement in intra-
trade is attributed to the effort of Africans to integrate into the regional and international market
(Bouet et al., 2013). Despite this improvement, intra-African trade is still low, hence should be
strengthened. Market fragmentation (lack of infrastructure; monetary, tax and trade fragmentation;
and red tape for traders) limits the development of the region’s trade potential. These barriers
should be tackled and given priority as they increase price instability within the region and
negatively affect food security (Badiane et al., 2014; NEPAD, 2005).
20. 25
References
Arezki, R., Hadri, K., Loungani, P., & Rao, Y. (2013). Testing the Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis since
1650: Evidence from Panel Techniques that Allow for Multiple Breaks. IMF Working Paper 13/180.
Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Badiane, O., Odjo, S., & Jemaneh, S. (2014). More resilient domestic food markets through regional
trade. In O. Badiane, T. Makombe & G. Bahiigwa (Eds.), Promoting Agricultural Trade to Enhance
Resilience in Africa. ReSAKSS Annual Trends and Outlook Report. Washington, DC: International Food
Policy Research Institute.
Bouet, A., Laborde, D., & Deason, L. (2013). Global trade patterns, competitiveness and growth outlook.
In O. Badiane, T. Makombe & G. Bahiigwa (Eds.), Promoting Agricultural Trade to Enhance Resilience
in Africa. ReSAKSS Annual Trends and Outlook Report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy
Research Institute.
Brulhart, M. (2008). An Account of Global Intra-industry Trade, 1962–2006. Background Paper, World
Bank 2009 World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Bryceson, D. F. (2015). Reflections on the unravelling of the Tanzanian peasantry, 1975–2015. In M.
Stahl (Ed.), Looking Back, Looking Ahead: Land, Agriculture and Society in East Africa. Uppsala: The
Nordic Africa Institute.
Collier, P., & Dercon, S. (2014). African agriculture in 50 years: Smallholders in a rapidly changing
world? World Development, 63, 92-101.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2003). Trade Reforms and Food
Security: Conceptualizing the Linkages. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
FAO. (2015). The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations.
Gaulier, G., & Zignago, S. (2010). BACI: International Trade Database at the Product-level: The 1994-
2007 Version. CEPII Working Paper 2010-23. Paris: CEPII.
Golub, S. S. (2012). Entrepôt trade and smuggling in West Africa: Benin, Togo and Nigeria. The World
Economy, 35(9), 1139-1161.
Kose, M. A., & Riezman, R. (2001). Trade shocks and macroeconomic fluctuations in Africa. Journal of
Development Economics, 65(1), 55–80.
LARES (2005). Le Trafic Illicite des Produits Pétroliers entre le Benin et le Nigeria: Vice ou Vertu pour
l'Economie Béninoise? Technical report. Cotonou: Laboratoire d'Analyse Régional et d'Expertise Sociale.
Levard, L., & Benkhala, A. (2013). How to Promote Intra-African Agricultural Trade? Analysis of
Possibilities and Impediments Regarding the Development of Intra-African Agricultural Trade. Nogent-
sur-Marne, France: Les Editions du GRET.
21. 26
New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD). (2013). Agriculture in Africa: Transformation and
Outlook. Addis Ababa: NEPAD/African Union.
Odjo, S., & Badiane, O. (2017). Competitiveness of African agricultural exports. In O. Badiane, S. Odjo
& J. Collins (Eds.), African Agricultural Trade Status Report.
Otsuki, T., Wilson, J., & Sewadeh, M. (2001). Saving two in a billion: Quantifying the trade effect of
European food safety standards on African exports. Food Policy, 26(5), 495–514.
Prebisch, R. (1950). The Economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. Economic
Bulletin for Latin America, 7, 1-12.
Rakotoarisoa, M. A., Iafrate, M., & Paschali, M. (2011). Why Has Africa Become a Net Food Importer?
Explaining Africa Agricultural and Food Trade Deficits. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations.
Rolland, J. P., & Alpha, A. (2011). Analyse de la Cohérence des Politiques Commerciales en Afrique de
l’Ouest. Document de Travail 114. Paris: Agence Francaise de Developpement.
Kareem, O. I. (2014). The European Union Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and Africa’s Exports.
EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2014/98. Fiesole, Italy: European University Institute.
Singer, H. (1950). The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American
Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 40, 473-485.
Songwe, V., & Winkler, D. (2012). Exports and Export Diversification in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Strategy
for Post-Crisis Growth. African Growth Initiative Working Paper 3. Washington, DC: The Brookings
Institution.
World Trade Organization (2015). International Trade Statistics 2015. Geneva: World Trade
Organization.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2015). Key Statistics and Trends in
International Trade 2015: The Trade Slowdown. Geneva: UNCTAD, Division on International Trade In
Goods and Services, and Commodities.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2014). United Nations Conference
on Trade and Development Database. www.unctadstat.unctad.org
World Bank. (2015). World Development Indicators Database.
http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=World%20Development%20Indicators
Yotopoulos, P., & Lau, L. (1974). On modelling the agrarian sector in developing countries: An
integrated approach of micro and macroeconomics. Journal of Development Economics, 1, 105-127.
22. 27
Annex 2.1 The BACI global trade database
BACI stands for “Base pour le commerce international” and is the world trade database developed
by the CEPII7
. The database is defined at a high level of product disaggregation and is the main
source used throughout this chapter. BACI is based on data from the UN COMTRADE database,
which is the world's largest database of trade statistics, maintained by the United Nations Statistics
Division (UNSD). COMTRADE is the main global source of trade statistics in goods, covering
more than 95% of world trade. BACI tries to improve UN COMTRADE by addressing the main
issues related to it: missing information for some African countries, reporting in different
nomenclatures, no distinction between zero trade flows and missing values in raw data, etc. To
address the issues, BACI has developed a procedure that reconciles exporter and importer
declarations using both mirror data and gravity modeling (see Gaulier et al., 2010). This procedure
allows for a significant increase in the number of countries with available data.
In its standard version, BACI provides export values and quantities at the HS 6-digit level. Data
are provided for over 200 countries since 1995. The database is updated every year. The
retreatment of data is particularly important for countries that do not report frequently to
COMTRADE (especially in Africa). Table A1 illustrates the data issue and the absence of
reporting for ECOWAS countries to UN COMTRADE from 1988 to 2010. In BACI all countries
are observed for imports and exports.
7 Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationals is a research center based in Paris and part of the
Prime Minister’s Office through the Centre d’Analyse Strategique, now “France Strategie.”
23. 28
Table A.1: ECOWAS countries’ declaration to UN COMTRADE
1988 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Benin Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 13
Burkina Faso Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 9
Cote d'Ivoire Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 9
Cape Verde Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 13
Ghana Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8
Guinea Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 10
Gambia Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 13
Guinea-Bissau Y Y Y 3
Liberia 0
Mali Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 12
Niger Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 13
Nigeria Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 9
Senegal Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 13
Sierra Leone
Togo Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 12
NB of Countries declaring Imports 8 9 8 11 10 12 12 12 10 12 12 10 11
Note: Y stands for yes if the country declares that particular year.
28. 33
Table A2.4: list of products corresponding to the HS 4 nomenclature
HS4 Product Description
0102 Live bovine animals.
0104 Live sheep and goats.
0202 Meat of bovine animals, frozen.
0206 Edible offal of bovine animals, swine, sheep, goats, horses, asses, mules or hinnies, fresh, chilled or frozen.
0207 Meat and edible offal, of the poultry of heading No. 01.05, fresh, chilled or frozen.
0303 Fish, frozen, excluding fish fillets and other fish meat of heading No. 03.04.
0304 Fish fillets and other fish meat (whether or not minced), fresh, chilled or frozen.
0307 Molluscs, whether in shell or not, live, fresh, chilled, frozen, dried, salted or in brine; aquatic invertebrates other than crustaceans and molluscs,
live, fresh, chilled, frozen, dried, salted or in brine; flours, meals and pellets of
0402 Milk and cream, concentrated or containing added sugar or other sweetening matter.
0406 Cheese and curd.
0603
Cut flowers and flower buds of a kind suitable for bouquets or for ornamental purposes, fresh, dried, dyed, bleached, impregnated or otherwise
prepared.
0702 Tomatoes, fresh or chilled.
0709 Other vegetables, fresh or chilled.
0713 Dried leguminous vegetables, shelled, whether or not skinned or split.
0801 Coconuts, Brazil nuts and cashew nuts, fresh or dried, whether or not shelled or peeled.
0802 Other nuts, fresh or dried, whether or not shelled or peeled.
0803 Bananas, including plantains, fresh or dried.
0805 Citrus fruit, fresh or dried.
0806 Grapes, fresh or dried.
0901 Coffee, whether or not roasted or decaffeinated; coffee husks and skins; coffee substitutes containing coffee in any proportion.
0902 Tea, whether or not flavoured.
1001 Wheat and meslin.
1005 Maize (corn).
1006 Rice.
1101 Wheat or meslin flour.
1107 Malt, whether or not roasted.
1201 Soya beans, whether or not broken.
29. 34
1207 Other oil seeds and oleaginous fruits, whether or not broken.
1211 Plants and parts of plants (including seeds and fruits), of a kind used primarily in perfumery, in pharmacy or for insecticidal, fungicidal or similar
purposes, fresh or dried, whether or not cut, crushed or powdered.
1507 Soya-bean oil and its fractions, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified.
1509 Olive oil and its fractions, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified.
1511 Palm oil and its fractions, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified.
1512 Sunflower-seed, safflower or cotton-seed oil and fractions thereof, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified.
1516 Animal or vegetable fats and oils and their fractions, partly or wholly hydrogenated, inter-esterified, re-esterified or elaidinised, whether or not
refined, but not further prepared.
1604 Prepared or preserved fish; caviar and caviar substitutes prepared from fish eggs.
1701 Cane or beet sugar and chemically pure sucrose, in solid form.
1801 Cocoa beans, whole or broken, raw or roasted.
1802 Cocoa shells, husks, skins and other cocoa waste.
1803 Cocoa paste, whether or not defatted.
1804 Cocoa butter, fat and oil.
1901 Malt extract; food preparations of flour, meal, starch or malt extract, not containing cocoa or containing less than 40% by weight of cocoa
calculated on a totally defatted basis, not elsewhere specified or including; food preparations
1902 Pasta, whether or not cooked or stuffed (with meat or other substances) or otherwise prepared, such as spaghetti, macaroni, noodles, lasagne,
gnocchi, ravioli, cannelloni; couscous, whether or not prepared.
1905 Bread, pastry, cakes, biscuits and other bakers' wares, whether or not containing cocoa; communion wafers, empty cachets of a kind suitable for
pharmaceutical use, sealing wafers, rice paper and similar products.
2002 Tomatoes prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid.
2009 Fruit juices (including grape must) and vegetable juices, unfermented and not containing added spirit, whether or not containing added sugar or
other sweetening matter.
2106 Food preparations not elsewhere specified or included.
2202 Waters, including mineral waters and aerated waters, containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or flavoured, and other non-alcoholic
beverages, not including fruit or vegetable juices of heading No. 20.09.
30. 35
2203 Beer made from malt.
2204 Wine of fresh grapes, including fortified wines; grape must other than that of heading No. 20.09.
2207 Undenatured ethyl alcohol of an alcoholic strength by volume of 80 % vol or higher; ethyl alcohol and other spirits, denatured, of any strength.
2208 Undenatured ethyl alcohol of an alcoholic strength by volume of less than 80 % vol; spirits, liqueurs and other spirituous beverages.
2303 Residues of starch manufacture and similar residues, beetpulp, bagasse and other waste of sugar manufacture, brewing or distilling dregs and
waste, whether or not in the form of pellets.
2304 Oilcake and other solid residues, whether or not ground or in the form of pellets, resulting from the extraction of soyabean oil.
2309 Preparations of a kind used in animal feeding.
2401 Unmanufactured tobacco; tobacco refuse.
2402 Cigars, cheroots, cigarillos and cigarettes, of tobacco or of tobacco substitutes.
2403
Other manufactured tobacco and manufactured tobacco substitutes; homogenised or reconstituted tobacco; tobacco extracts and essences.
5101 Wool, not carded or combed.
5201 Cotton, not carded or combed.