SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 73
Target Audience : Oncology Fellows, Oncology physicians, Oncologists Archer Board Review Courses www.Ccsworkshop.com   ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA
ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA EPIDEMIOLOGY ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL - EPIDEMIOLOGY ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL - ETIOLOGY ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL - OUTCOME ,[object Object],[object Object]
ALL - CLASSIFICATION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL – CLASSIFICATION FAB
ALL – CLASSIFICATION FAB
ALL – CLASSIFICATION WHO ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL IMMUNOPHENOTYPING IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Types FAB Class Tdt T cell associate antigen B cell associate antigen c Ig s Ig Precursor B L1,L2 + - + CD10, 19, 20, 22, 24 -/+ - Precursor T L1,L2 + + 2,3,4,5,7,8 - - - B-cell L3 - - + - +
ALL: IMMUNOPHENOTYPIC CLASSIFICATION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],ALL Subtype, % Frequency in Children Frequency in Adults B lineage ,[object Object],70 55 ,[object Object],10 15 ,[object Object],5 5 T lineage 15 25
ALL CYTOGENETICS AND FISH – GENETIC SUBTYPES OF ALL
ALL IN  ADULTS CYTOGENETIC AND MOLECULAR ABNORMALITIES
MOLECULAR AND CYTOGENETIC SUBTYPES OF B-LINEAGE ALL *Most common in infant leukemia (mixed AML-ALL). Bassan R, et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004;50:223-261.  Subtype ( Cytogenetics) Karyotype Childhood  Frequency, % Adult Frequency, % Childhood EFS, % Adult EFS, % Hyperdiploidy > 50 chr 25 5 80-90 40-50 TEL/AML1 t(12;21) 25 3 85-90 ? MYC  t(8;14) 2 5 75-85 60-70 bcr/abl t(9;22) 5 33 20-40 < 10 MLL/AF4* t(4;11) 3 6 30 15
MOLECULAR AND CYTOGENETIC SUBTYPES T-CELL LINEAGE ALL Armstrong SA, Look AT. J Clin Oncol. 2005;26:6306-6315. Graux C, et al. Leukemia. 2006;20:1496-1510.  Subtype (Cytogenetics) Karyotype Childhood Frequency, % Adult Frequency, % Childhood EFS, % Adult EFS, % HOX11 expression -- 3 33 90 60 NOTCH1 mutations -- 50 50 90 -- TCR t(14q11) 15 25 70 60 MLL-ENL t(11;19) 2 2 95 --
ALL CYTOGENETICS – GENETIC SUBTYPES OF ALL Cytogenetic abnomality Genes Adult Childhood Type Prognosis t(9:22)   BCR/ABL 30%  3%  Common / Pre B-ALL (CD10+) Azurophilic granules Unfavorable t(v;11q23) or t(4,11) MLL 5% Topoismomerase related 3% Infants with organomegaly Pro B-ALL CD10- Unfavorable - High rate of early treatment failure t(8,14) MYC/IGH 5% 2% Mature B-Cell, FAB L3 t(1,14) TAL1/TCR  3% T-cell disease t(1;19) PBX/E2A   3% 6% (25% Pre B-ALL)   Previously unfavorable now normal prognosis with aggressive therapy. t(12;21) TEL/AML1  ( now referred as ETV6/RUNX1) Rare ( 2%) 16-29% ( most common “t” in children)   Favorable Hyperdiploidy >50     7% 25%   Favorable Hypodiploidy < 44     2% 5%   Unfavorable
ALL ,[object Object]
ALL  CLINICAL PRESENTATION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL  CLINICAL PRESENTATION
ALL  CLINICAL PRESENTATION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],ALL  DIAGNOSIS
ALL DIAGNOSIS/ PRE-RX INVESTIGATIONS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
TREATMENT DECISIONS ALL
ALL: TYPICAL TREATMENT ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Induction Consolidation Maintenance Over a period of months 2-3 years CNS Prophylaxis (IT-MTX)
ALL – TREATMENT  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
REMISSION INDUCTION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
TREATMENT OF ADULT ALL ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL INDUCTION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
TREATMENT OF ALL: BFM-BASED MODEL  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
HYPER-CVAD REGIMEN ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Kantarjian H, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:547-561.
HYPER-CVAD IN ADULTS WITH ALL ,[object Object],Kantarjian et al. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:547-561. Outcome Hyper-CVAD (N = 204) VAD (N = 222) 5-Year CR, % 38 32 5-Year Survival, % 39 21
ADULT ALL: LARGE CLINICAL TRIALS Clinical Trials N Age Treatment CR, % DFS, % GMALL 02/84 562 28 BFM 75 39 GMALL 05/93 1163 35 BFM, HD-ARA-C,  HD-MTX 87 35-40 CALGB 8811 198 35 BFM, ↑ Cy, ↑ ASP 85 36 CALGB 19802 163 41 BFM, ↑ Cy , ↑ DNR 78 35 GIMEMA 778 28 BFM ± Cy 82 29 MRC-UKALL XA 618 > 15 BFM + early intensification 89 -- MRC/ECOG 1521 BFM + HD-MTX ± SCT 91 38 UCSF 8707 84 27 BFM intensified  93 52 Hyper-CVAD 288 40 Cy, D, AD, HD-MTX, HD-ARA-C  92 38
ADULT ALL: LARGE CLINICAL TRIALS (CONT’D) Study Study Years References GMALL 02/84 84-90 Hoelzer D, et al.  Blood. 1998;71:123-131. GMALL 05/93 93-99 Gökbuget N, et al.  Blood. 2001;98:802a. CALGB 8811 88-91 Larson R, et al. Blood. 1995;85:2025-2037. CALGB 19802 99-01 Larson RA. Ann Hematol. 2004;83(suppl 1): S127-S128. GIMEMA 88-94 Annino L, et al.  Blood. 2002;99:863-871. MRC-UKALL XA Durrant I, et al. Br J Haematol. 1997;99:84-92. MRC/ECOG 93-04 Rowe J, et al. Blood. 2005;106:3760-3767.  UCSF 8707 87-98 Linker C, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2464-2471. Hyper-CVAD 92-00 Kantarjian H, et al.  Cancer. 2004;101:2788-2801.
ALL -  INDUCTION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM PROPHYLAXIS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL - SUPPORTIVE CARE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL RISK STRATIFICATION ,[object Object],[object Object]
PROGNOSTIC INDICATORS
ALL - CONSOLIDATION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION (SCT): CIMBTR RECOMMENDATIONS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],.  CIBMTR, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
ALL: SCT AT FIRST CR Several trials comparing chemotherapy vs. autologous stem cell transplant vs.  Allo-SCT reveal improved survival with allo-SCT in High Risk patients as shown  above.  Study Endpoint CHT Auto SCT Allo SCT Improved Outcome CIBMTR vs German studies LFS 32% -- 34% NS JALSG 93 OS 40% -- 46% NS LALA 87 OS 35% 48% NS LALA 87  SR OS 45% 51% NS LALA 87  HR OS 20% 44% Allo LALA 94  HR OS 35% 44% 51% Allo GOELAL02  HR OS -- 40% 75% Allo
ALLO BMT VS AUTO BMT IN PATIENTS WITH PH- ALL: MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993 Rowe JM, et al. ASH 2006. Abstract 2. Patients with  Ph- ALL aged < 55 yrs in complete remission after induction therapy (N = 919) Sibling Allo BMT (n = 389) High-Dose  Methotrexate   (3 doses) HLA-matched sibling donor available? Yes High-Dose  Methotrexate   (3 doses) Auto BMT Consolidation/Maintenance  Chemotherapy: 2.5 years (n = 530) No
ALLO BMT VS AUTO BMT IN PATIENTS WITH PH- ALL: 5-YEAR RESULTS MRC/UK-ALL ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Rowe JM, et al. ASH 2006. Abstract 2. Outcome by Risk Group, % Donor (n = 389) No Donor (n = 530) P  Value Overall 5-yr survival 53 45 .02 ,[object Object],40 36 .50 ,[object Object],63 51 .01 10-yr relapse rate ,[object Object],39 62 < .0001 ,[object Object],27 50 < .0001
ALLO BMT VS AUTO BMT IN PATIENTS WITH PH- ALL: 5-YEAR RESULTS ( (MRC/UKALL CONT’D) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Rowe JM, et al. ASH 2006. Abstract 2. Outcome by Risk Group, % Chemotherapy Auto BMT P  Value Overall 5-yr survival 47 37 .06 ,[object Object],40 32 .2 ,[object Object],49 41 .2 Overall EFS 42 33 .02
ADULT ALL: MAINTENANCE THERAPY ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ADULT ALL: MAINTENANCE THERAPY (CONT’D) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
L-ASPARAGINASE IN ALL ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
L-ASPARAGINASE: MECHANISM OF ACTION* *Sensitivity of ALL cells to asparaginase due to low asparagine synthetase in leukemic cells. Blood L-asparagine L-asparaginase NH3 + L-aspartate Cell L-asparagine Asparagine synthetase Glutamine L-aspartate L-asparagine + Glutamate +
L-ASPARAGINASE IN ADULT ALL ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
L-ASPARAGINASE: TOXICITY ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL -SPECIAL GROUPS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL IN OLDER ADULTS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
COMPLICATIONS OBSERVED IN OLDER ADULTS WITH ALL ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PHILADELPHIA CHROMOSOME (PH+) ALL ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
IMATINIB IN PH+ ALL ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
TREATMENT OF RELAPSED PH+ ALL: DASATINIB Coutre S, et al. ASCO 2006. Abstract 6528 Ph+ ALL CML (Chronic Phase) Patients, N 36 186 Imatinib status, % ,[object Object],94 68 ,[object Object],6 32 Response, % ,[object Object],31 90 ,[object Object],11 ,[object Object],58 45 ,[object Object],58 33 Median duration of response, mos 4.8 > 6.0
B-CELL ALL (FAB L3): BURKITT’S LEUKEMIA ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Time of Evaluation Minimum Residual Disease Prognosis Children ,[object Object],< 0.01%  Excellent outcome ,[object Object],> 0.1% High relapse risk
ALL MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
T-CELL ALL ,[object Object],[object Object]
NELARABINE IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY ADULT T-ALL/T-LBL 1. Goekbuget N, et al. Blood. 2005;106:47a. Abstract 150. 2. DeAngelo D, et al. Blood. 2002;100:198a. Abstract 743. Study CR PR OS Toxicity GMALL   (N = 53) [1] 47% 13% 16% Myelosuppression Neurotoxicity  (n = 2) CALGB   (N = 38) [2] 26% 5% 32% at Yr 1 Myelosuppression Elevated LFT Neurotoxicity  (n = 1)
LATE COMPLICATIONS OF THERAPY ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL – SALVAGE THERAPY
RELAPSED/ REFRACTORY ALL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS  Independent prognostic factors associated with achieving  CR during salvage therapy  include duration of first CR and platelet count. Several factors are associated with poor survival rates : - short duration of first CR, thrombocytopenia, elevated percent bone marrow blasts, and low albumin level Poor Prognostic Factors for CR Poor Prognostic Factors for Survival Albumin level < 3 g/L* Albumin level < 3 g/L* Duration of first CR < 36 mos* Duration of first CR < 36 mos* Hemoglobin level < 10 g/dL Hemoglobin level < 10 g/dL Platelet count ≤ 50 x 10 9 /L* Platelet count ≤ 50 x 10 9 /L* Percent bone marrow blasts > 50% Percent bone marrow blasts > 50%* Peripheral blood blasts ≥ 1% Percent peripheral blood blasts ≥ 1% White blood cell count > 20 x 10 9 /L
ALL: NEW CHEMOTHERAPIES ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PEGYLATED ASPARAGINASE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],.
CLOFARABINE IN ALL ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],1. Jeha S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1917-1923. 2. Kantarjian H, et al. Blood. 2003;102:2379-2386.
T-CELL ALL: GAMMA SECRETASE INHIBITOR MK 0752 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],DeAngelo D, et al. ASCO 2006. Abstract 6585.
ALL: TARGETED TREATMENTS ,[object Object],ALL Subtype Target Treatment Ph+ BCR/ABL Imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib T cell NUP214-ABL1 NOTCH1 mutation Imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib Gamma secretase inhibitor Mature B cell CD20 Rituximab Precursor B cell CD20 Rituximab All subtypes CD52 Alemtuzumab MLL and hyperdiploidly FLT3 overexpression CEP701, PKC 212
ALL: NOVEL MANAGEMENT APPROACHES ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ALL ,[object Object]
TREATMENT OF ALL: SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
TREATMENT OF ALL: SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS (CONT’D) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

More Related Content

What's hot

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaChronic lymphocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaJoyshree Panda
 
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Dangerous Complication of E. coli
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Dangerous Complication of E. coliHemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Dangerous Complication of E. coli
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Dangerous Complication of E. coliBill Marler
 
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) dr arun haldia
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)  dr arun haldiaAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)  dr arun haldia
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) dr arun haldiaDr Arun Haldia
 
Mature T/NK cell Neoplasms
Mature T/NK cell NeoplasmsMature T/NK cell Neoplasms
Mature T/NK cell NeoplasmsAhmed Makboul
 
Acute leukemias aml-csbrp
Acute leukemias aml-csbrpAcute leukemias aml-csbrp
Acute leukemias aml-csbrpPrasad CSBR
 
leukemoid reaction and leukemia
leukemoid reaction and leukemialeukemoid reaction and leukemia
leukemoid reaction and leukemiapriya jaswani
 
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemiaChronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemiaDrSuman Roy
 
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia(CML)
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia(CML)Chronic Myeloid Leukemia(CML)
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia(CML)Md. Al-Amin
 
Lymphoproliferative disorders
Lymphoproliferative disordersLymphoproliferative disorders
Lymphoproliferative disordersAbdullah Abobakr
 
CML - DIAGNOSIS,MANAGEMENT AND RECENT ADVANCES
CML - DIAGNOSIS,MANAGEMENT AND RECENT ADVANCESCML - DIAGNOSIS,MANAGEMENT AND RECENT ADVANCES
CML - DIAGNOSIS,MANAGEMENT AND RECENT ADVANCESRajesh S
 
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ppt
Myelodysplastic Syndromes  pptMyelodysplastic Syndromes  ppt
Myelodysplastic Syndromes pptArijit Roy
 
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphomaDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphomamt53y8
 
Chronic lymphoproliferative disorders
Chronic lymphoproliferative disordersChronic lymphoproliferative disorders
Chronic lymphoproliferative disordersVeena Raja
 

What's hot (20)

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaChronic lymphocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
 
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Dangerous Complication of E. coli
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Dangerous Complication of E. coliHemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Dangerous Complication of E. coli
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Dangerous Complication of E. coli
 
Aml converted
Aml convertedAml converted
Aml converted
 
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) dr arun haldia
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)  dr arun haldiaAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)  dr arun haldia
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) dr arun haldia
 
Mature T/NK cell Neoplasms
Mature T/NK cell NeoplasmsMature T/NK cell Neoplasms
Mature T/NK cell Neoplasms
 
Renal pediatric tumors
Renal pediatric tumorsRenal pediatric tumors
Renal pediatric tumors
 
Acute leukemias aml-csbrp
Acute leukemias aml-csbrpAcute leukemias aml-csbrp
Acute leukemias aml-csbrp
 
leukemoid reaction and leukemia
leukemoid reaction and leukemialeukemoid reaction and leukemia
leukemoid reaction and leukemia
 
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemiaChronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemia
 
Acute leukemia
Acute leukemiaAcute leukemia
Acute leukemia
 
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia(CML)
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia(CML)Chronic Myeloid Leukemia(CML)
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia(CML)
 
Acute leukemia
Acute leukemiaAcute leukemia
Acute leukemia
 
Chronic myeloid Leukemia
Chronic myeloid LeukemiaChronic myeloid Leukemia
Chronic myeloid Leukemia
 
Lymphoproliferative disorders
Lymphoproliferative disordersLymphoproliferative disorders
Lymphoproliferative disorders
 
CML - DIAGNOSIS,MANAGEMENT AND RECENT ADVANCES
CML - DIAGNOSIS,MANAGEMENT AND RECENT ADVANCESCML - DIAGNOSIS,MANAGEMENT AND RECENT ADVANCES
CML - DIAGNOSIS,MANAGEMENT AND RECENT ADVANCES
 
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ppt
Myelodysplastic Syndromes  pptMyelodysplastic Syndromes  ppt
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ppt
 
chronic myeloid leukemia
chronic myeloid leukemiachronic myeloid leukemia
chronic myeloid leukemia
 
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphomaDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
 
Chronic lymphoproliferative disorders
Chronic lymphoproliferative disordersChronic lymphoproliferative disorders
Chronic lymphoproliferative disorders
 
Thrombophilia
ThrombophiliaThrombophilia
Thrombophilia
 

Viewers also liked

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia dr narmada
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia dr narmadaAcute lymphoblastic leukemia dr narmada
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia dr narmadaNarmada Tiwari
 
8. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
8. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia8. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
8. Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaWhiteraven68
 
Acute lymphoid leukemia (case presentation)
Acute lymphoid leukemia (case presentation)Acute lymphoid leukemia (case presentation)
Acute lymphoid leukemia (case presentation)Dhritiman Chakrabarti
 
Leukemia Powepoit Presentation
Leukemia Powepoit PresentationLeukemia Powepoit Presentation
Leukemia Powepoit PresentationAlexisRam96
 
Acute myeloid leukemia
Acute myeloid leukemiaAcute myeloid leukemia
Acute myeloid leukemiaPradip Katwal
 
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia approach and treatment
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia approach and treatmentAcute lymphoblastic leukemia approach and treatment
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia approach and treatmentahmed mjali
 
UKALL 2011 Trial Considerations
UKALL 2011 Trial ConsiderationsUKALL 2011 Trial Considerations
UKALL 2011 Trial ConsiderationsUCLPartners
 
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) in Children
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) in ChildrenAcute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) in Children
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) in Childrenspa718
 
Acute leukemia 2nd year students
Acute leukemia 2nd year studentsAcute leukemia 2nd year students
Acute leukemia 2nd year studentsJustiniano Castro
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukaemiaAcute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
 
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia dr narmada
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia dr narmadaAcute lymphoblastic leukemia dr narmada
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia dr narmada
 
8. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
8. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia8. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
8. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
 
Acute lymphoid leukemia (case presentation)
Acute lymphoid leukemia (case presentation)Acute lymphoid leukemia (case presentation)
Acute lymphoid leukemia (case presentation)
 
Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaChildhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
 
Leukemia Powepoit Presentation
Leukemia Powepoit PresentationLeukemia Powepoit Presentation
Leukemia Powepoit Presentation
 
Leukemia
LeukemiaLeukemia
Leukemia
 
Acute myeloid leukemia
Acute myeloid leukemiaAcute myeloid leukemia
Acute myeloid leukemia
 
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia approach and treatment
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia approach and treatmentAcute lymphoblastic leukemia approach and treatment
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia approach and treatment
 
Archer USMLE Step 3 CCS workshop 2018
Archer USMLE Step 3 CCS workshop 2018Archer USMLE Step 3 CCS workshop 2018
Archer USMLE Step 3 CCS workshop 2018
 
UKALL 2011 Trial Considerations
UKALL 2011 Trial ConsiderationsUKALL 2011 Trial Considerations
UKALL 2011 Trial Considerations
 
What is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?
What is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?What is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?
What is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?
 
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) in Children
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) in ChildrenAcute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) in Children
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) in Children
 
Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology
 
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
 
Thrombophilias
ThrombophiliasThrombophilias
Thrombophilias
 
Acute leukemia 2nd year students
Acute leukemia 2nd year studentsAcute leukemia 2nd year students
Acute leukemia 2nd year students
 
Ethics in medicine - Archer USMLE step 3
Ethics in medicine - Archer USMLE step 3Ethics in medicine - Archer USMLE step 3
Ethics in medicine - Archer USMLE step 3
 
Nephrology - ARCHER USMLE STEP 3
Nephrology - ARCHER USMLE STEP 3Nephrology - ARCHER USMLE STEP 3
Nephrology - ARCHER USMLE STEP 3
 
Carcinoma of unknown primary
Carcinoma of unknown primaryCarcinoma of unknown primary
Carcinoma of unknown primary
 

Similar to Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Leukaemia lecture 02 ALL transcript
Leukaemia lecture 02   ALL transcriptLeukaemia lecture 02   ALL transcript
Leukaemia lecture 02 ALL transcriptRabiul Haque
 
Pediatric neoplasia
Pediatric neoplasiaPediatric neoplasia
Pediatric neoplasiaSpringer
 
Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms (2020)
Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms (2020)Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms (2020)
Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms (2020)Ahmed Makboul
 
Timeliness in diagnosis of acute leukemia in paediatric age group
Timeliness in diagnosis of acute leukemia in paediatric age groupTimeliness in diagnosis of acute leukemia in paediatric age group
Timeliness in diagnosis of acute leukemia in paediatric age groupkamali purushothaman
 
Integrated haematopathology
Integrated haematopathology Integrated haematopathology
Integrated haematopathology Dr. Rajesh Bendre
 
Myeloproliferative
MyeloproliferativeMyeloproliferative
Myeloproliferativeraj kumar
 
Myeloproliferative
MyeloproliferativeMyeloproliferative
Myeloproliferativeraj kumar
 
chronic leukemia.pptx
chronic leukemia.pptxchronic leukemia.pptx
chronic leukemia.pptxNatanA7
 
Acute leukaemias othieno abinya
Acute leukaemias othieno abinyaAcute leukaemias othieno abinya
Acute leukaemias othieno abinyaKesho Conference
 
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Acute Myeloid LeukemiaAcute Myeloid Leukemia
Acute Myeloid LeukemiaAli Swailmeen
 
Acute leukaemia
Acute leukaemia Acute leukaemia
Acute leukaemia NITISH SHAH
 
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaRanjita Pallavi
 
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemiaChronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemiakhursheed falak
 

Similar to Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (20)

Leukaemia lecture 02 ALL transcript
Leukaemia lecture 02   ALL transcriptLeukaemia lecture 02   ALL transcript
Leukaemia lecture 02 ALL transcript
 
LUKEMIA
LUKEMIALUKEMIA
LUKEMIA
 
Pediatric neoplasia
Pediatric neoplasiaPediatric neoplasia
Pediatric neoplasia
 
Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms (2020)
Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms (2020)Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms (2020)
Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms (2020)
 
AML management
AML managementAML management
AML management
 
Leukemia
LeukemiaLeukemia
Leukemia
 
Timeliness in diagnosis of acute leukemia in paediatric age group
Timeliness in diagnosis of acute leukemia in paediatric age groupTimeliness in diagnosis of acute leukemia in paediatric age group
Timeliness in diagnosis of acute leukemia in paediatric age group
 
Integrated haematopathology
Integrated haematopathology Integrated haematopathology
Integrated haematopathology
 
Myeloproliferative
MyeloproliferativeMyeloproliferative
Myeloproliferative
 
Myeloproliferative
MyeloproliferativeMyeloproliferative
Myeloproliferative
 
chronic leukemia.pptx
chronic leukemia.pptxchronic leukemia.pptx
chronic leukemia.pptx
 
ALL (PCNA)
ALL (PCNA)ALL (PCNA)
ALL (PCNA)
 
Acute leukaemias othieno abinya
Acute leukaemias othieno abinyaAcute leukaemias othieno abinya
Acute leukaemias othieno abinya
 
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Acute Myeloid LeukemiaAcute Myeloid Leukemia
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
 
Acute leukaemia
Acute leukaemia Acute leukaemia
Acute leukaemia
 
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
 
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (PCNA)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (PCNA)Acute Myeloid Leukemia (PCNA)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (PCNA)
 
Cml1
Cml1Cml1
Cml1
 
LEUKEMIA.pptx
LEUKEMIA.pptxLEUKEMIA.pptx
LEUKEMIA.pptx
 
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemiaChronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemia
 

More from Archer Review USMLE and NCLEX

Safety and infection control - Archer NCLEX webinars
Safety and infection control - Archer NCLEX webinarsSafety and infection control - Archer NCLEX webinars
Safety and infection control - Archer NCLEX webinarsArcher Review USMLE and NCLEX
 
Archer NCLEX Webinars - Diets and Nutrition crash course
Archer NCLEX Webinars - Diets and Nutrition crash courseArcher NCLEX Webinars - Diets and Nutrition crash course
Archer NCLEX Webinars - Diets and Nutrition crash courseArcher Review USMLE and NCLEX
 
Archer NCLEX Rapid Review - Full Content Syllabus - Two days
Archer NCLEX Rapid Review - Full Content Syllabus - Two daysArcher NCLEX Rapid Review - Full Content Syllabus - Two days
Archer NCLEX Rapid Review - Full Content Syllabus - Two daysArcher Review USMLE and NCLEX
 
Cardiology and EKGs - Archer NCLEX crash course/ webinar
Cardiology and EKGs - Archer NCLEX crash course/ webinarCardiology and EKGs - Archer NCLEX crash course/ webinar
Cardiology and EKGs - Archer NCLEX crash course/ webinarArcher Review USMLE and NCLEX
 
Fluids and electrolytes Archer NCLEX content review webinar
Fluids and electrolytes  Archer NCLEX content review webinarFluids and electrolytes  Archer NCLEX content review webinar
Fluids and electrolytes Archer NCLEX content review webinarArcher Review USMLE and NCLEX
 
Infectious disease Archer USMLE Step3 Review Lectures
Infectious disease   Archer USMLE Step3 Review LecturesInfectious disease   Archer USMLE Step3 Review Lectures
Infectious disease Archer USMLE Step3 Review LecturesArcher Review USMLE and NCLEX
 

More from Archer Review USMLE and NCLEX (20)

Endocrine Archer NCLEX course Webinar
Endocrine Archer NCLEX course WebinarEndocrine Archer NCLEX course Webinar
Endocrine Archer NCLEX course Webinar
 
Safety and infection control - Archer NCLEX webinars
Safety and infection control - Archer NCLEX webinarsSafety and infection control - Archer NCLEX webinars
Safety and infection control - Archer NCLEX webinars
 
Archer NCLEX Webinars - Diets and Nutrition crash course
Archer NCLEX Webinars - Diets and Nutrition crash courseArcher NCLEX Webinars - Diets and Nutrition crash course
Archer NCLEX Webinars - Diets and Nutrition crash course
 
Rapid Content Prep - NCLEX- Archer Review
Rapid Content Prep - NCLEX- Archer ReviewRapid Content Prep - NCLEX- Archer Review
Rapid Content Prep - NCLEX- Archer Review
 
Archer NCLEX Rapid Review - Full Content Syllabus - Two days
Archer NCLEX Rapid Review - Full Content Syllabus - Two daysArcher NCLEX Rapid Review - Full Content Syllabus - Two days
Archer NCLEX Rapid Review - Full Content Syllabus - Two days
 
Cardiology and EKGs - Archer NCLEX crash course/ webinar
Cardiology and EKGs - Archer NCLEX crash course/ webinarCardiology and EKGs - Archer NCLEX crash course/ webinar
Cardiology and EKGs - Archer NCLEX crash course/ webinar
 
Fluids and electrolytes Archer NCLEX content review webinar
Fluids and electrolytes  Archer NCLEX content review webinarFluids and electrolytes  Archer NCLEX content review webinar
Fluids and electrolytes Archer NCLEX content review webinar
 
Archer NCLEX Pharmacology crash course - Webinar
Archer NCLEX Pharmacology crash course - WebinarArcher NCLEX Pharmacology crash course - Webinar
Archer NCLEX Pharmacology crash course - Webinar
 
Archer NCLEX Review - Electrolyte imbalances
Archer NCLEX Review - Electrolyte imbalancesArcher NCLEX Review - Electrolyte imbalances
Archer NCLEX Review - Electrolyte imbalances
 
Archer USMLE Step 3 Nephrology 2019
Archer USMLE Step 3 Nephrology 2019Archer USMLE Step 3 Nephrology 2019
Archer USMLE Step 3 Nephrology 2019
 
Pulmonology critical care- archer step3 lectures
Pulmonology  critical care- archer step3 lecturesPulmonology  critical care- archer step3 lectures
Pulmonology critical care- archer step3 lectures
 
Endocrinology archer step3 lectures
Endocrinology   archer step3 lecturesEndocrinology   archer step3 lectures
Endocrinology archer step3 lectures
 
Infectious disease Archer USMLE Step3 Review Lectures
Infectious disease   Archer USMLE Step3 Review LecturesInfectious disease   Archer USMLE Step3 Review Lectures
Infectious disease Archer USMLE Step3 Review Lectures
 
Archer step 3 ccs workshop 2019
Archer step 3 ccs workshop 2019Archer step 3 ccs workshop 2019
Archer step 3 ccs workshop 2019
 
Cutaneous lymphomas
Cutaneous lymphomasCutaneous lymphomas
Cutaneous lymphomas
 
Bladder cancer
Bladder cancerBladder cancer
Bladder cancer
 
Plasma cell disorders ppt
Plasma cell disorders pptPlasma cell disorders ppt
Plasma cell disorders ppt
 
Thrombocytopenia
ThrombocytopeniaThrombocytopenia
Thrombocytopenia
 
Several Samples - Personal Statements
Several Samples - Personal StatementsSeveral Samples - Personal Statements
Several Samples - Personal Statements
 
Internal medicine Personal Statement
Internal medicine Personal StatementInternal medicine Personal Statement
Internal medicine Personal Statement
 

Recently uploaded

POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxSayali Powar
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdfClass 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdfakmcokerachita
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppCeline George
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Celine George
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsKarinaGenton
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdfClass 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 

Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

  • 1. Target Audience : Oncology Fellows, Oncology physicians, Oncologists Archer Board Review Courses www.Ccsworkshop.com ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12. ALL CYTOGENETICS AND FISH – GENETIC SUBTYPES OF ALL
  • 13. ALL IN ADULTS CYTOGENETIC AND MOLECULAR ABNORMALITIES
  • 14. MOLECULAR AND CYTOGENETIC SUBTYPES OF B-LINEAGE ALL *Most common in infant leukemia (mixed AML-ALL). Bassan R, et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004;50:223-261. Subtype ( Cytogenetics) Karyotype Childhood Frequency, % Adult Frequency, % Childhood EFS, % Adult EFS, % Hyperdiploidy > 50 chr 25 5 80-90 40-50 TEL/AML1 t(12;21) 25 3 85-90 ? MYC t(8;14) 2 5 75-85 60-70 bcr/abl t(9;22) 5 33 20-40 < 10 MLL/AF4* t(4;11) 3 6 30 15
  • 15. MOLECULAR AND CYTOGENETIC SUBTYPES T-CELL LINEAGE ALL Armstrong SA, Look AT. J Clin Oncol. 2005;26:6306-6315. Graux C, et al. Leukemia. 2006;20:1496-1510. Subtype (Cytogenetics) Karyotype Childhood Frequency, % Adult Frequency, % Childhood EFS, % Adult EFS, % HOX11 expression -- 3 33 90 60 NOTCH1 mutations -- 50 50 90 -- TCR t(14q11) 15 25 70 60 MLL-ENL t(11;19) 2 2 95 --
  • 16. ALL CYTOGENETICS – GENETIC SUBTYPES OF ALL Cytogenetic abnomality Genes Adult Childhood Type Prognosis t(9:22)   BCR/ABL 30% 3% Common / Pre B-ALL (CD10+) Azurophilic granules Unfavorable t(v;11q23) or t(4,11) MLL 5% Topoismomerase related 3% Infants with organomegaly Pro B-ALL CD10- Unfavorable - High rate of early treatment failure t(8,14) MYC/IGH 5% 2% Mature B-Cell, FAB L3 t(1,14) TAL1/TCR 3% T-cell disease t(1;19) PBX/E2A   3% 6% (25% Pre B-ALL)   Previously unfavorable now normal prognosis with aggressive therapy. t(12;21) TEL/AML1 ( now referred as ETV6/RUNX1) Rare ( 2%) 16-29% ( most common “t” in children)   Favorable Hyperdiploidy >50     7% 25%   Favorable Hypodiploidy < 44     2% 5%   Unfavorable
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19. ALL CLINICAL PRESENTATION
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32. ADULT ALL: LARGE CLINICAL TRIALS Clinical Trials N Age Treatment CR, % DFS, % GMALL 02/84 562 28 BFM 75 39 GMALL 05/93 1163 35 BFM, HD-ARA-C, HD-MTX 87 35-40 CALGB 8811 198 35 BFM, ↑ Cy, ↑ ASP 85 36 CALGB 19802 163 41 BFM, ↑ Cy , ↑ DNR 78 35 GIMEMA 778 28 BFM ± Cy 82 29 MRC-UKALL XA 618 > 15 BFM + early intensification 89 -- MRC/ECOG 1521 BFM + HD-MTX ± SCT 91 38 UCSF 8707 84 27 BFM intensified 93 52 Hyper-CVAD 288 40 Cy, D, AD, HD-MTX, HD-ARA-C 92 38
  • 33. ADULT ALL: LARGE CLINICAL TRIALS (CONT’D) Study Study Years References GMALL 02/84 84-90 Hoelzer D, et al. Blood. 1998;71:123-131. GMALL 05/93 93-99 Gökbuget N, et al. Blood. 2001;98:802a. CALGB 8811 88-91 Larson R, et al. Blood. 1995;85:2025-2037. CALGB 19802 99-01 Larson RA. Ann Hematol. 2004;83(suppl 1): S127-S128. GIMEMA 88-94 Annino L, et al. Blood. 2002;99:863-871. MRC-UKALL XA Durrant I, et al. Br J Haematol. 1997;99:84-92. MRC/ECOG 93-04 Rowe J, et al. Blood. 2005;106:3760-3767. UCSF 8707 87-98 Linker C, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2464-2471. Hyper-CVAD 92-00 Kantarjian H, et al. Cancer. 2004;101:2788-2801.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41. ALL: SCT AT FIRST CR Several trials comparing chemotherapy vs. autologous stem cell transplant vs. Allo-SCT reveal improved survival with allo-SCT in High Risk patients as shown above. Study Endpoint CHT Auto SCT Allo SCT Improved Outcome CIBMTR vs German studies LFS 32% -- 34% NS JALSG 93 OS 40% -- 46% NS LALA 87 OS 35% 48% NS LALA 87 SR OS 45% 51% NS LALA 87 HR OS 20% 44% Allo LALA 94 HR OS 35% 44% 51% Allo GOELAL02 HR OS -- 40% 75% Allo
  • 42. ALLO BMT VS AUTO BMT IN PATIENTS WITH PH- ALL: MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993 Rowe JM, et al. ASH 2006. Abstract 2. Patients with Ph- ALL aged < 55 yrs in complete remission after induction therapy (N = 919) Sibling Allo BMT (n = 389) High-Dose Methotrexate (3 doses) HLA-matched sibling donor available? Yes High-Dose Methotrexate (3 doses) Auto BMT Consolidation/Maintenance Chemotherapy: 2.5 years (n = 530) No
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48. L-ASPARAGINASE: MECHANISM OF ACTION* *Sensitivity of ALL cells to asparaginase due to low asparagine synthetase in leukemic cells. Blood L-asparagine L-asparaginase NH3 + L-aspartate Cell L-asparagine Asparagine synthetase Glutamine L-aspartate L-asparagine + Glutamate +
  • 49.
  • 50.
  • 51.
  • 52.
  • 53.
  • 54.
  • 55.
  • 56.
  • 57.
  • 58.
  • 59.
  • 60.
  • 61. NELARABINE IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY ADULT T-ALL/T-LBL 1. Goekbuget N, et al. Blood. 2005;106:47a. Abstract 150. 2. DeAngelo D, et al. Blood. 2002;100:198a. Abstract 743. Study CR PR OS Toxicity GMALL (N = 53) [1] 47% 13% 16% Myelosuppression Neurotoxicity (n = 2) CALGB (N = 38) [2] 26% 5% 32% at Yr 1 Myelosuppression Elevated LFT Neurotoxicity (n = 1)
  • 62.
  • 63. ALL – SALVAGE THERAPY
  • 64. RELAPSED/ REFRACTORY ALL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS Independent prognostic factors associated with achieving CR during salvage therapy include duration of first CR and platelet count. Several factors are associated with poor survival rates : - short duration of first CR, thrombocytopenia, elevated percent bone marrow blasts, and low albumin level Poor Prognostic Factors for CR Poor Prognostic Factors for Survival Albumin level < 3 g/L* Albumin level < 3 g/L* Duration of first CR < 36 mos* Duration of first CR < 36 mos* Hemoglobin level < 10 g/dL Hemoglobin level < 10 g/dL Platelet count ≤ 50 x 10 9 /L* Platelet count ≤ 50 x 10 9 /L* Percent bone marrow blasts > 50% Percent bone marrow blasts > 50%* Peripheral blood blasts ≥ 1% Percent peripheral blood blasts ≥ 1% White blood cell count > 20 x 10 9 /L
  • 65.
  • 66.
  • 67.
  • 68.
  • 69.
  • 70.
  • 71.
  • 72.
  • 73.

Editor's Notes

  1. In the last two years, we saw about 4 ALL cases in our institutes – all were in Hispanics.
  2. Sharp decline in adolescence and then in to adulthood. Among adults, incidence increases after the age of 60
  3. Bloom syndrome (congenital telangiectatic erythema) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by telangiectases and photosensitivity, growth deficiency of prenatal onset, variable degrees of immunodeficiency, and increased susceptibility to neoplasms of many sites and types. Fanconi anemia : Excess chromosomal fragility. Includes multiple birth defects, including short stature, microcephaly, microphthalmia, epicanthal folds, dangling thumbs, site of ureteral reimplantation, congenital dislocated hips, and rocker bottom feet
  4. High remission rates are possible both in children and adults but relapses are common in adults – hence, 5 year survival rates only 35% . The less favorable prognosis for adults with ALL is related to several factors, including a much higher frequency of poor-risk prognostic factors based on disease biology, comorbidities associated with older age that impair the ability to tolerate intensive multiagent chemotherapeutic regimens that have been used successfully in children, subtle differences in the treatment regimens used by medical oncologists treating adults, and treatment compliance.
  5. SMALL ARROWS IN L3 ARE VACUOLES, VERY LARGE NUCLEOLI ARE SEEN IN L3. L3 – Guarded prognosis, . The L3 cell usually has mature B-cell characteristics - treated using same therapy as for highly aggressive B-cell lymphoma variants ( burkitt-like)
  6. Divides ALL into 2 major categories: precursor lymphoid neoplasms and mature lymphoid neoplasms. The precursor lymphoid diseases include both B lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma and T lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. The new classifi cation further subdivides the precursor B-cell ALL cases by recurring molecular-cytogenetic abnormalities to provide prognostic and therapeutic information and to facilitate the implementation of specific molecularly targeted therapies. Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia is the one subset of ALL that is classified as a mature B lymphoid neoplasm. 3
  7. Burkitt ALL also called mature B-CELL ALL characterized by distinctive - has a unique immunophenotype with expression of surface immunoglobulin and strong expression of CD20 with distinctive morphologic and cytogenetic features. These ALLs are associated with chromosome translocations involving C-myc PROTOONCOGENE ON CHR 8 ( 8,14) . Myeloid Markers (11,13, 15,33, 65) : Apart from above, Myeloid-associated antigens may be expressed on otherwise typical lymphoblasts . 20 TO 30% ALL cases) The pattern of myeloid-associated antigen expression correlates with certain genetic features of blast cells. CD15, CD33, and CD65 are expressed in ALL with a rearranged MLL gene ( t4.11), and CD13 and CD33 expressed in patients with the ETV6-RUNX1 (also known as TEL-AML1) fusion. A subset of patients coexpress both lymphoid and myeloid markers but do not cluster with precursor T-cell, precursor B-cell, or acute myeloid leukemia in gene expression profiling (biphenotypic). These patients may not respond to myeloid-directed therapy but may attain remission with ALL-directed induction treatment. The presence of myeloid-associated antigens lacks prognostic significance but can be useful in immunologic monitoring of patients for minimal residual leukemia. Pro-B CD19(+),Tdt(+),CD10(-),CyIg(-), Common CD19(+),Tdt(+),CD10(+),CyIg(-), Pre-B CD19(+),Tdt(+),CD10(+),CyIg(+),SmIg(-)
  8. ALL arises from a lymphoid progenitor cell that has sustained multiple specific genetic damages that lead to malignant transformation and proliferation. Thus, Genetic classification of ALL yields more biological information rather than any other means – genetic classification yields progonostic information and information regarding specific therapies tailored to certain subtypes. Hyperdiploidy &gt; 50 chromosomes for example, seen in 25% of pediatric ALL , associated with favorable prognosis in childhood ALL– and predicts increased sensitivity to anti-metabolites like MTX ( less toxic therapies). In contrast, extreme hyperdiploidy (59 to 84 chromosomes) or hypodiploidy (fewer than 45 chromosomes) is associated with poor outcome and require aggressive and toxic therapies.
  9. BCR-ABL – 25% ; MLL – 10% and MYC – BURKITT Are the most common of all cytogenetic abnormalities in adults Others – 23%, hypodiploidy 2%, hyper 7%, tel-aml 2%
  10. TCR, T-cell receptor
  11. Certain translocations may be associated with poor prognosis and requires aggressive treatment options. Such as above. The gene involved is shown too. More aggressive treatment regimens are recommended for children with t(1;19) and they respond well to such strategies, whereas the addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy should be considered in patients with t(9;22). Patients with the t(4;11) MLL rearrangement have a significantly poorer treatment outcome than do those without this abnormality and are treated with more intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation are usually apt for these patients.. Some structural abnormalities are associated with favorable prognosis. They include the t(12;21) ETV6/RUNX1 (formerly referred to as TEL/AML1) rearrangement in B-precursor ALL, which occurs in 20 to 25 percent of cases of childhood ALL [49,50]. CYTOGENETICS must be considered in context with other risk factors in deciding the best therapeutic option. As an example, in one prospective study of 44 children with high-risk ALL, as determined by age, WBC count, and immunophenotype , cytogenetic abnormalities did not independently predict outcome
  12. ANEMIA, THROMBOCYTOPENIA, NEUTROPENIA – BM Failure. Leukemic infiltration related are : organomegaly, LAD, MEDIASTINAL MASSES, CNS INFILTRATION. Clinically, a case is defined as lymphoma (LBL) if there is a mass lesion in the mediastinum or elsewhere and &lt;25 percent blasts in the bone marrow. It is classified as leukemia (ALL) if there are &gt;25 percent bone marrow blasts, with or without a mass lesion. WHO Minimal criteria for acute leukemia is BM blasts &gt; 20%
  13. Lymphoblast is more malleable – hence, symptoms of hyperleucocytosis are rare.
  14. MPO – myeloperoxidase, TdT – terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase
  15. IT-MTX, intrathecal methotrexate Principles : Induction of remission, consolidation therapy ( may include chemotherapy vs. Allo HSCT) followed by maintainance rx if consolidatiojn included Chemotherapy. No maintainanence required if consolidation included allo-HSCT except in Ph+ ALL where imatinib is sometimes used in maintainance after allo-HSCT.
  16. Those with CR has better outcome
  17. Remission induction includes the following components : Chemotherapy, CNS prophylaxis, Supportive Care and Treatment of complications.
  18. Induction regimens : Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM), calgb 8811 – cancer and leukemia group
  19. BFM, Berlin-Munster-Frankfurt
  20. MTX, methotrexate; WBC, white blood cell count
  21. Cranial irradiation and IT chemotherapy combined can cause acute toxicities that may delay post-remission consolidation therapy
  22. CR, complete remission t(4,11) – MLL - UNFAVORABLE; t(12.21) – TEL/AML – FAVORABLE; TIme to attain CR after induction therapy Pre-B linieage is favorable in pediatric ALL
  23. Allo SCT, allogeneic stem cell transplant; Auto SCT, autologous stem cell transplant; CIBMTR, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research; LFS, leukemia free survival; CR, complete remission; MUD, matched unrelated donor , Second CR means a CR after relapse
  24. Allo SCT, allogeneic stem cell transplant; Auto SCT, autologous stem cell transplant; CHT, chemotherapy; HR, high risk; CIBMTR, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research; LFS, leukemia free survival; OS, overall survival; ST, standard risk; In LALA 87 Trial, improved outcome noted with allo-SCT in HR patients were as difference in OS was non-significant in SR patients. However, MRC-UK/ALL trial showed the benefit was more for SR patients rather than HR patients which is contradictory to other studies --- however, this study was done from 1993 ----- he results of the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALL XII/ECOG E2993 trial which was initiated in 1993 to prospectively define the role of HSTC in ALL, were reported in December 2006 . Of note, in newly diagnosed adults with Ph-negative ALL up to 60 years of age, the greatest benefit from allogeneic HSTC was observed in patients with standard-risk ALL (&lt; 35 years of age; WBC &lt; 30,000 for B-lineage ALL or &lt; 100,000 for T-lineage ALL) compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. For patients with high-risk ALL, allogeneic HSCT had a more potent antileukemia effect, manifested by lower relapse rates than chemotherapy. However, this benefit was abrogated by higher transplant related mortality, resulting in no net survival benefit . These results differ from those reported in the aforementioned studies. The benefit of allogeneic HSCT might have outweighed the risks in high-risk patients if the nonrelapse mortality rate had been lower than the reported rate of 39%. Considering that this study began enrolling patients more than 15 years ago, it is possible that HSCT-related mortality would be lower at the present time , resulting in an improvement in overall survival, even among high-risk patients. It is also possible that some patients younger than 35 years of age would have been classified as having high-risk disease because of unfavorable cytogenetics and, therefore, would have experienced less transplant-related mortality. This study also confirmed that autologous HSTC cannot replace consolidation or maintenance treatment in any risk group.
  25. ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Allo, allogeneic; Auto, autologous; BMT, bone marrow transplantation; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; MRC, Medical Research Council; Ph-, Philadelphia chromosome negative; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
  26. OS, overall survival; WBC, white blood cell count
  27. EFS, event-free survival; OS, overall survival
  28. Mature B-cell ALL has high cure rates after consolidation and does not require maintainance.
  29. The drug acts by depleting serum asparagines, which can be reproduced in normal cells by asparagine synthetase. However, ALL cells are unable to produce their own asparagine and, therefore, are dependent on the plasma for this amino acid. Plasma asparagine depletion leads to inhibition of protein synthesis, which depletes RNA and DNA synthesis, resulting in apoptotic cell death of the leukemic cells
  30. CNS, central nervous system Always test dose must be administered before L-ASPARAGINASE
  31. CR, complete remission; Ph+, Philadelphia chromosome positive The prognosis for patients over the age of 60 remains poor, with a DFS rate of &lt; 10%. Older adults with ALL are excellent candidates for novel therapeutic approaches.
  32. CR, complete remission; G-CSF, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
  33. In ALL, Ph+ is seen only with immunophenotype pre-B ALL. PH+ IS AUTOMATICALLY A HIGH RISK ALL SCT, stem cell transplant
  34. CR, complete remission; SCT stem cell transplant Imatinib achieves more durable response and gives time until a donor can be found ---hence, increases access to HSCT fore more patients.
  35. Role of second generation TKIs in PH+ ALL is still under investigation . However, it may have somr role in relapsed PH+ALL after imatinib. CCyR; complete cytogenetic response; CHR, complete hemoatologic response; MCyR, major cytogenetic response; NEL, no evidence of leukemia (CHR but absoulte neutrophil count &lt; 1,000 and platelets 100,000
  36. CNS, central nervous system; CR, complete remission; FAB, French-American-British; LDH, lactic dehydrogenase ; MTX, methotrexate Incorporating Rituximab has resulted in an increased survival rates &gt; 70%.
  37. CR, complete remission; PCR, polymerase chain reaction
  38. CALGB, Cancer and Leukemia Group B; GMALL, German Multicenter Study Group for Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia; LFT, liver function test In a recent study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, nelarabine treatment produced complete remission rates of 26% with minimal toxicities in relapsed/refractory ALL patients.
  39. Outcomes of salvage therapy in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients remains poor. Complete remission (CR) rates are typically &lt; 50% and long-term disease-free survival is rare. I
  40. Salvage chemotherapy regimens are structured according to outcomes from frontline therapy. Some newer agents have been approved in the relapsed setting. After second CR, allo –SCT in all patients!!!!!!!!!!!
  41. IT, intrathecal
  42. Allo SCT, allogeneic stem cell transplant; auto SC, autologous stem cell transplant
  43. CR, complete remission; MRD, minimum residual disease