Actualización de los nuevos anticoagulantes orales
en base a datos en práctica clínica real
Madrid, septiembre 2016
Domingo Marzal Martín
ANTICOAGULACIÓN 3.0
AVK …“nuevo ACO”
datos de vida real
Bleeding
Thrombosis
Björck F, et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:172-80
Bleeding
CNS Bleeding
Björck F, et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:172-80
stroke or SEE secondary efficacy outcomes
major bleedings secondary safety outcomes
Ruff CT, et al. Lancet 2014;383:955-62
Efficacy and safety of NOACs vs warfarin in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials
dabigatran
datos de vida real
Connolly et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139-51
Graham DJ et al. Circulation. 2015;131:157-64
Independent FDA study of Medicare patients
Resultados dabigatran 150 mg BID
n=56.576
Medicare analysis1
HR (95% CI)
Ictus isquémico 0.70 (0.57–0.85)
Mortalidad 0.76 (0.67–0.86)
Hemorragia grave GI 1.51 (1.32–1.73)
HIC 0.30 (0.21–0.42)
Favor warfarina
0.1 2.01.0
Favor dabigatran
Dabigatran vs warfarina
Hemorragia grave GI superior en:
•Mujeres ≥ 75 años
•Hombres ≥ 85 años
Graham DJ et al. Circulation. 2015;131:157-64
Connolly et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139-51
Villines TC, et al. Thromb Haemost. 2015;14:1290-8
Department of Defense
Larsen TB et al. Am J Med. 2014;127:650-6
National Danish Registries
bleeding risk
n=11.315
0.10 0.50 1.00 2.00 5.00
0.72 (0.59–0.88)
0.93 (0.74–1.16)
0.52 (0.28–0.95)
0.50 (0.27–0.94)
0.30 (0.17–0.54)
Favours dabigatran Favours warfarin
VKA-naïve stratum
0.68 (0.55–0.84)
0.67 (0.53–0.85)
0.70 (0.33–1.52)
1.45 (0.84–2.50)
0.33 (0.17–0.66)
Any
Major
Fatal
GI
ICH
Any
Major
Fatal
GI
ICH
Dabigatran 110 mg
vs warfarin
Dabigatran 150 mg
vs warfarin
HR (95% CI)
rivaroxaban
datos de vida real
Patel MR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883-91 Tamayo S, et al. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:63-8
0
1
2
3
4
Hemorragias mayores
3,6%
2.9%
ROCKET AF
Farmacovigilancia
Eventos(%/año)
n=7.111
rivaroxaban
n=27.476
US Pharmacovigilance Study
US Pharmacovigilance Study
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
Hemorragia
intracraneal
Hemorragia mortal
0,5%
0,2%0,2%
<0,1%
ROCKET AF
Farmacovigilancia
Eventos(%/año)
Patel MR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883-91 Tamayo S, et al. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:63-8
CHADS2 Ictus previoa
ROCKET AF 3,5 55 %
XANTUS 2,0 19 %
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
Ictus/ES Todos tipos ictus Muerte
1,7 1,7
1,9
0,8 0,7
1,9
ROCKET AF XANTUS
Tasadeincidencia,%/año
Camm AJ, et al, Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1145-53
CHADS2 Ictus previoa
ROCKET AF 3,5 55 %
XANTUS 2,0 19 %
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
Hemorragia
mayor
HIC Hemorragia
digestiva
3,6
0,5
2,02,1
0,4
0,9
ROCKET AF XANTUS
Tasadeincidencia,%/año
Camm AJ, et al, Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1145-53
apixaban
datos de vida real
baseline characteristics
Deitelzweig S, et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1971
Deitelzweig S, et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1971
major bleeding
all-cause hospitalization
***P<.001; **P<.01; *P<.05
Tepper P; et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1975
Tepper P; et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1975
Dabigatran vs apixaban
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5
Hemorragia grave
HIC
Hemorragia GI
grave
Hemorragia NGCR
Hemorragia
GI NGCR
CRI CRI
Favorece a dabigatrán Favorece a apixaban Favorece a rivaroxaban Favorece a apixaban
CRI 1.34 (1.20-1.51)CRI 0.99 (0.86-1.12)
CRI 1.41 (1.01-1.97)CRI 1.08 (0.75-1.55)
CRI 1.54 (1.23-1.91)CRI 1.04 (0.83-1.32)
CRI 1.39 (1.28-1.51)CRI 1.03 (0.95-1.12)
CRI 1.50 (1.31-1.73)CRI 1.24 (1.07-1.44)
Rivaroxaban vs apixaban
Tepper P; et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1975
adjusted incidences of bleeding
inpatient bleeding
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
CumulativeProportionofPatients
withAnyBleed
Days following Index
Apixaban
Dabigatran
Warfarin
Rivaroxaban
Log rank P < 0.0001
Lin I, et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.P6215
Real-world Bleeding Risk among NVAF Patients Prescribed Apixaban, Dabigatran,
Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin: Analysis of Electronic Health Records
analysis of any bleed during follow up
Warfarina vs apixaban: HR 1.34 (95% Cl 1.13–1.58)
Rivaroxaban vs apixaban: HR 1.46 (95% Cl 1.23–1.75)
Dabigatrán vs apixaban: HR 0.91 (95% Cl 0.73–1.13)
Lip G, et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.P6217
Real World Comparison of Major Bleeding Risk Among NVAF Patients
Newly Initiated on Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban or Warfarin
Dabigatran (4.173)
150 mg NR
3.768 405
Rivaroxaban (10.050)
20 mg NR
8.066 1.984
Apixaban (2.402)
5 mg NR
2.057 345
Warfarin (12.713)
cumulative incidence of major bleeding
%patientsmajorbleeding
(Inpatientbleeding)
Time from Anticoagulation initiation (days)
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390
Warfarin vs Apixaban: HR 1.93 (95% CI 1.12–3.33) P=0.018
Rivaroxaban vs Apixaban: HR 2.19 (95% Cl 1.26 –3.79) P=0.0052
Dabigatran vs Apixaban: HR 1.71 (95% Cl 0.94–3.10) P= 0.079
Lip G, et al. ESC Congress 2016 Poster Presentation
Is Major Bleeding Risk for Oral Anticoagulants Similar Between Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Patients Newly Initiated On Warfarin and Propensity Score Matched NOAC Initiators? A Real-
World Study
Lip G, et al. ESC Congress 2016 Poster Presentation
Is Major Bleeding Risk for Oral Anticoagulants Similar Between Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Patients Newly Initiated On Warfarin and Propensity Score Matched NOAC Initiators? A Real-
World Study
Larsen TB et al. BMJ 2016;353:i3189
Masseria LI, et al. ESC Congress 2016 Presentation
Lip G, et al. ESC Congress 2016 Poster Presentation
Major Bleeding Risk in Patients ≥75 Years with NVAF Initiating Oral Anticoagulants:
A Real-world Comparison of Warfarin, Apixaban, Dabigatran, or Rivaroxaban
anticoagulación 3.0
idarucizumab
Adapted from Lane et al. Presented at ESOC 2016 (ESOC6-0603)
gracias por vuestra atención
domingo.marzal@secardiologia.es
@domingomarzal

Actualización de los nuevos anticoagulantes orales en base a datos en práctica clínica real

  • 1.
    Actualización de losnuevos anticoagulantes orales en base a datos en práctica clínica real Madrid, septiembre 2016 Domingo Marzal Martín ANTICOAGULACIÓN 3.0
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Bleeding Thrombosis Björck F, etal. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:172-80
  • 4.
    Bleeding CNS Bleeding Björck F,et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:172-80
  • 5.
    stroke or SEEsecondary efficacy outcomes major bleedings secondary safety outcomes Ruff CT, et al. Lancet 2014;383:955-62 Efficacy and safety of NOACs vs warfarin in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Connolly et al.N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139-51 Graham DJ et al. Circulation. 2015;131:157-64 Independent FDA study of Medicare patients
  • 8.
    Resultados dabigatran 150mg BID n=56.576 Medicare analysis1 HR (95% CI) Ictus isquémico 0.70 (0.57–0.85) Mortalidad 0.76 (0.67–0.86) Hemorragia grave GI 1.51 (1.32–1.73) HIC 0.30 (0.21–0.42) Favor warfarina 0.1 2.01.0 Favor dabigatran Dabigatran vs warfarina Hemorragia grave GI superior en: •Mujeres ≥ 75 años •Hombres ≥ 85 años Graham DJ et al. Circulation. 2015;131:157-64
  • 9.
    Connolly et al.N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139-51 Villines TC, et al. Thromb Haemost. 2015;14:1290-8 Department of Defense
  • 10.
    Larsen TB etal. Am J Med. 2014;127:650-6 National Danish Registries bleeding risk n=11.315 0.10 0.50 1.00 2.00 5.00 0.72 (0.59–0.88) 0.93 (0.74–1.16) 0.52 (0.28–0.95) 0.50 (0.27–0.94) 0.30 (0.17–0.54) Favours dabigatran Favours warfarin VKA-naïve stratum 0.68 (0.55–0.84) 0.67 (0.53–0.85) 0.70 (0.33–1.52) 1.45 (0.84–2.50) 0.33 (0.17–0.66) Any Major Fatal GI ICH Any Major Fatal GI ICH Dabigatran 110 mg vs warfarin Dabigatran 150 mg vs warfarin HR (95% CI)
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Patel MR, etal. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883-91 Tamayo S, et al. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:63-8 0 1 2 3 4 Hemorragias mayores 3,6% 2.9% ROCKET AF Farmacovigilancia Eventos(%/año) n=7.111 rivaroxaban n=27.476 US Pharmacovigilance Study
  • 13.
    US Pharmacovigilance Study 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 Hemorragia intracraneal Hemorragiamortal 0,5% 0,2%0,2% <0,1% ROCKET AF Farmacovigilancia Eventos(%/año) Patel MR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883-91 Tamayo S, et al. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:63-8
  • 14.
    CHADS2 Ictus previoa ROCKETAF 3,5 55 % XANTUS 2,0 19 % 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 Ictus/ES Todos tipos ictus Muerte 1,7 1,7 1,9 0,8 0,7 1,9 ROCKET AF XANTUS Tasadeincidencia,%/año Camm AJ, et al, Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1145-53
  • 15.
    CHADS2 Ictus previoa ROCKETAF 3,5 55 % XANTUS 2,0 19 % 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 Hemorragia mayor HIC Hemorragia digestiva 3,6 0,5 2,02,1 0,4 0,9 ROCKET AF XANTUS Tasadeincidencia,%/año Camm AJ, et al, Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1145-53
  • 16.
  • 17.
    baseline characteristics Deitelzweig S,et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1971
  • 18.
    Deitelzweig S, etal. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1971 major bleeding all-cause hospitalization
  • 19.
    ***P<.001; **P<.01; *P<.05 TepperP; et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1975
  • 20.
    Tepper P; etal. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1975 Dabigatran vs apixaban 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 Hemorragia grave HIC Hemorragia GI grave Hemorragia NGCR Hemorragia GI NGCR CRI CRI Favorece a dabigatrán Favorece a apixaban Favorece a rivaroxaban Favorece a apixaban CRI 1.34 (1.20-1.51)CRI 0.99 (0.86-1.12) CRI 1.41 (1.01-1.97)CRI 1.08 (0.75-1.55) CRI 1.54 (1.23-1.91)CRI 1.04 (0.83-1.32) CRI 1.39 (1.28-1.51)CRI 1.03 (0.95-1.12) CRI 1.50 (1.31-1.73)CRI 1.24 (1.07-1.44) Rivaroxaban vs apixaban
  • 21.
    Tepper P; etal. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.1975 adjusted incidences of bleeding inpatient bleeding
  • 22.
    0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 0 30 6090 120 150 180 CumulativeProportionofPatients withAnyBleed Days following Index Apixaban Dabigatran Warfarin Rivaroxaban Log rank P < 0.0001 Lin I, et al. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.P6215 Real-world Bleeding Risk among NVAF Patients Prescribed Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin: Analysis of Electronic Health Records analysis of any bleed during follow up Warfarina vs apixaban: HR 1.34 (95% Cl 1.13–1.58) Rivaroxaban vs apixaban: HR 1.46 (95% Cl 1.23–1.75) Dabigatrán vs apixaban: HR 0.91 (95% Cl 0.73–1.13)
  • 23.
    Lip G, etal. ESC Congress 2015; oral poster no.P6217 Real World Comparison of Major Bleeding Risk Among NVAF Patients Newly Initiated on Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban or Warfarin Dabigatran (4.173) 150 mg NR 3.768 405 Rivaroxaban (10.050) 20 mg NR 8.066 1.984 Apixaban (2.402) 5 mg NR 2.057 345 Warfarin (12.713) cumulative incidence of major bleeding %patientsmajorbleeding (Inpatientbleeding) Time from Anticoagulation initiation (days) 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Warfarin vs Apixaban: HR 1.93 (95% CI 1.12–3.33) P=0.018 Rivaroxaban vs Apixaban: HR 2.19 (95% Cl 1.26 –3.79) P=0.0052 Dabigatran vs Apixaban: HR 1.71 (95% Cl 0.94–3.10) P= 0.079
  • 24.
    Lip G, etal. ESC Congress 2016 Poster Presentation Is Major Bleeding Risk for Oral Anticoagulants Similar Between Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Newly Initiated On Warfarin and Propensity Score Matched NOAC Initiators? A Real- World Study
  • 25.
    Lip G, etal. ESC Congress 2016 Poster Presentation Is Major Bleeding Risk for Oral Anticoagulants Similar Between Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Newly Initiated On Warfarin and Propensity Score Matched NOAC Initiators? A Real- World Study
  • 26.
    Larsen TB etal. BMJ 2016;353:i3189
  • 27.
    Masseria LI, etal. ESC Congress 2016 Presentation
  • 28.
    Lip G, etal. ESC Congress 2016 Poster Presentation Major Bleeding Risk in Patients ≥75 Years with NVAF Initiating Oral Anticoagulants: A Real-world Comparison of Warfarin, Apixaban, Dabigatran, or Rivaroxaban
  • 30.
  • 32.
    Adapted from Laneet al. Presented at ESOC 2016 (ESOC6-0603)
  • 35.
    gracias por vuestraatención domingo.marzal@secardiologia.es @domingomarzal