SlideShare a Scribd company logo
EFFECT OF OLIVE OIL AND ITS PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS ON REDUCTION OF HEART
DISEASE RISK FACTORS AND OXIDATIVE
DAMAGE
M.I. Covas
Lipids and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit
Institut Municipal d´Investigació Mèdica (IMIM). Barcelona. Spain
Sessions dels Groups i Unitats d´Epidemiologia. IMIM. Maig 2006
Background
The benefits of olive oil consumption are becoming increasingly recognized.
Recently, the FDA permitted a claim on olive oil labels concerning:
“the benefits on the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) of eating about 2
tablespoons (23 grams) of olive oil daily, due to the monounsaturated fat
(MUFA) in olive oil”.
However, if the effect of olive oil can be attributed solely to is MUFA content, any
type of olive oil, rapeseed oil, or or MUFA-rich food would provide the same
health benefits.
Olive oil is the main source of fat in the Mediterranean Diet
Thus, Public Health implications exist as to whether a specific type of MUFA fat or
olive oil should be recomended as individualized eating strategies for oxidative stress
associated diseases prevention
OLIVE OIL COMPONENTS
• Major components: Fatty acids
– Saturated (8-14%)
– Monounsaturated (oleic acid 55-83%)
– Poliunsaturated (4-20%)
• Minor components:
– Squalene, Sterols, triterpenes
– Vitamin E, Beta-carotene
– Phenolic compounds (tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol,
oleuropeine, lignanes).
EUROPEAN OLIVE OIL MEDICAL INFORMATION LIBRARY
TYPES OF OLIVE OIL
OLIVES
LEAF REMOVAL
WASHING
CRUSHING-MILLING
PASTE MALAXATION
PRESSURE OR
CENTRIFUGATION
VIRGIN OLIVE OIL
OLIVE
POMACE
Refination
Orujo de oliva
Refination Refined olive oil
Mixture
Low phenolic content
(10-30 mg/Kg)
High phenolic content
(150-400 mg/Kg)
Low phenolic content
(10-70 mg/Kg)
Phenolic content (0-5 mg/kg)
Pomace olive oil Common olive oil
The phenolic content of an olive oil varies, depending on the cultivar, climate, ripeness of
the olives at harvesting, and the processing system for the type of olive oil:
Background
Olive oil phenolic compounds show:
•strong antioxidant properties against free
radical generation and LDL oxidation in
experimental studies
• delayed the progression of atherosclerosis
in animal models.
Oleate-rich LDL is less
susceptible against oxidative
modification than linoleate-rich
LDL.
There is increasing evidence that dietary phenolic compounds can modulate lipid
and lipoprotein metabolism.
Oxidative damage of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is linked pathogenically to a
variety of diseases such as cancer and also to ageing
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation is a hallmark for atherosclerosis
development.
Olive oil phenolic compounds are bioavailable in humans
Data regarding the benefits of olive oil phenolic compounds in humans
from real-life daily doses of olive oil are controversial and scarce
The protective effects on lipid oxidation in these trials being better displayed
in oxidative stress conditions
Carefully controlled studies in appropriate populations (i.e. oxidative stress
conditions, or with a large sample size (in the case of healthy volunteers), are
required to definitively establish the health properties of olive oil phenolic
compounds in humans.
Consensus report. Expert Panel
International Conference of Olive Oil and Health. Jaen, Spain October 2004
Expert Panel. Pérez-Jiménez, Coordinator, et al, Eur J Clin Invest 2005;35:421-4
THE EFFECT OF OLIVE OIL CONSUMPTION ON OXIDATIVE DAMAGE IN EUROPEAN
POPULATIONS. The EUROLIVE Study (QRLT-2001-00287)
Covas MI, Poulsen HE, Nyyssönen K, Zunft HFJ, Kiesewetter H, Gaddi A, López-Sabater C,
Kaikkonen J, on behalf of the EUROLIVE Investigators
IMIM
UBGL
KEPKA
DIfE
RHK
UKU
EUC
UB
JLB
UBER
Objective
To assess the effect of three similar types
of olive oil, but with differences in their
phenolic content, on blood lipids, and the
oxidative/antioxidative status in healthy
human volunteers.
3.1.1 Characteristics of the olive oils
Determination of phenolic content in several virgin olive oils
(HPC)Virgin olive oil
Picual from Jaen (Andalucia, Spain, 366 ppm of PC)
Measurement of fatty acid profile and vitamin E
Determination of fatty acid profile and vitamin E of several
refined virgin olive oils from similar cultivar and soil
(VLPC) Refined olive oil
(similar characteristics to the virgin one)
Mixture
(MPC) Common olive oil
3.1 Protocol of management for Olive Oils
Characteristics of the Olive Oils Administered
Type of olive oil
750 430 580
Free acidity (% oleic acid) 0.03 0.08 0.18
Peroxide value (mEq O2
/kg) 4.12 5.89 11.28
Fatty acids (%)
C14:0 0.01 0.01 0.01
C16:0 10.63 10.50 10.63
C16:1 0.88 0.86 0.88
C17:0 0.05 0.05 0.04
C17:1 0.09 0.09 0.09
C18:0 3.27 3.13 2.84
C18:1 79.08 79.80 80.60
C18:2 4.64 4.21 3.35
C20:0 0.39 0.39 0.35
C18:3 0.58 0.58 0.58
C20:1 0.26 0.25 0.25
C22:0 0.11 0.10 0.10
C24:0 0.01 0.02 0.02
α-Tocopherol (ppm) 229 228 228
Phenolic compounds (mg/Kg) 2.7 164 366
Squalene (mg/g) 3.0 3.2 3.4
β-sitosterol (mg/g) 1.4 1.5 1.5
The EUROLIVE Study
Study population: 200 healthy non-smoker males recruited between
December 2002 and July 2003 in 6 Centers of 5 European Countries (Denmark,
Finland, Germany (2 Centres), Italy, and Spain).
The EUROLIVE Study. Methods
Eligibility criteria: to be healthy on the basis of clinical exanimation and
laboratory analyses; willingness to provide written, informed consent; and to agree to
the adherence to the protocol
Exclusion criteria:
-smoking -intake of antioxidant supplements
- diabetes - hypertension
-Hyperlipidaemia - any condition limiting mobility
-obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2
)
-aspirin, or drugs with established antioxidant properties
-celiac or other intestinal disease, life-threatening diseases, or any other disease or
condition that would impair compliance.
Persons invited to be screened
n = 344
144 ineligible
98 Did Not Met Protocol criteria
46 Unwilling to Participate
68 Assigned to Order 2,
(MPC, LPC, HPC)
200 Randomized
67 Assigned to Order 1,
(HPC, MPC, LPC)
65 Assigned to Order 3
(LPC, HPC, MPC)
6 Out of Follow-up
3 Unable to adhere
2 Moved away
1 Collateral event
5 Out of Follow-up
2 Unable to adhere
2 Moved away
1 Collateral event
7 Out of Follow-up
4 Unable to adhere
1 Moved away
2 Collateral events
61 Included in the Analysis 63 Included in the Analysis 58 Included in the Analysis
Flow-chart describing progress of participants through the EUROLIVE Study
LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low, medium and high phenolic content, respectively.
The EUROLIVE Study. Methods
Latin Square for three treatments in the cross-over clinical trial
Examination Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Blood collection
Anthropometric measures
Order 1 HPC WO MPC WO LPC
Order 2 WO MPC WO LPC WO HPC
Order 3 WO LPC WO HPC WO MPC
LPC, MPC, and HPC: olive oils with low, medium, and high phenolic content
WO: wash-out period, (2 weeks) .Intervention periods 3 weeks (25 mL/day olive oil ingestion
Examination number (general measurements and/or blood collection): 1, baseline; 2, post-first washout; 3, post-first
intervention;
4, post-second washout; 5, post-second intervention; 6, post-third washout; 7, post-third intervention .
3DDR 3DDR 3DDR 3DDR
FHD/PA PA
The EUROLIVE Study. Methods
WO
Outcome measurements in the Clinical Trials
Urinary tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol, the major olive oil phenolic compounds, as markers of compliance
Oxidative markers
Lipid oxidation
F2 isoprostanes (pl)
OH-Fatty acids (pl)
Conjugated dienes (LDL)
Oxidized LDL (pl)
Antibodies against oxidized
LDL (s))
DNA and RNA
oxidation
8-oxo-dGuo (u)
8-oxo-Guo(u)
8-oxo-Gua (u)
Antioxidative markers
Endogenous
SOD (b)
GSH-Px (pl)
GR (pl)
GSH/GSSG (b)
Enterolactone (s)
PON (s)
Exogenous
AA (pl)
Tocopherol (pl)
β-carotene (pl)
Lycopene (pl)
Lipid status: Fatty acids in LDL; Serum Cholesterol, LDL, HDL
The EUROLIVE Study. Methods
3-O-methyl-hydroxytyrosol in urine as a marker of the individual bioavailability and metabolic capacity of the
hydroxytyrosol ingested.
No differences at baseline were observed among the three groups of
olive oil administration order:
•For energy, macronutrients, or for the main antioxidant (vit E, beta-
carotene...) or pro-oxidant intake (iron).
•For the evaluated end-points, with the exception of low levels of Ab-
oxLDL in order 1 group and 8-dGuo in order 3 group (P<0.05).
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
No carryover effect, examined through the interaction treatment by
period in the models, was observed for any outcome.
No changes in daily energy expenditure in leisure time physical
activity were observed from the beginning to the end of the study
(mean values, 282 vs 275 kcal/day).
Diet was similar in the three groups during each type of olive oil
administration.
Mean daily energy consumption (SD) and selected nutrient intake
(SD) according olive oil intervention
Olive Oil
Nutrient Low phenolics Medium
phenolics
High phenolics
Energy (kcal) 2212 (690.6) 2228 (741.4) 2245 (650.0)
Carbohydrate (%)* 48.4 (27.6) 46.2 (9.5) 46.3 (9.3)
Protein (%)* 15.3 (3.3) 15.6 (3.7) 15.4 (3.6)
Total Fat (%)* 36.2 (8.1) 36.2 (8.1) 36.1 (8.2)
Saturated fat (%)* 12.6 (3.5) 12.6 (3.5) 12.8 (3.6)
Monounsaturated fat (%)* 14.6 (4.4) 14.7 (4.7) 14.7 (4.6)
Polyunsaturated fat (%)* 4.9 (2.0) 4.9 (1.9) 4.8 (1.9)
Vitamin C (mg) 102 (71.4) 104 (73.2) 115 (96.5)
Vitamin E (mg) 9.2 (4.8) 9.2 (5.6) 8.9 (4.9)
ß-carotene (mg) 2.4 (2.6) 2.6 (3.0) 2.2 (2.3)
*Expressed in percentage of total energy intake
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
Changes in total fat after intervention periods
Post-HPCPost-MPCPost-LPCBaseline
Totalfat(g)
110
100
90
80
* * *
* P < 0.001, Tukey´s test
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low, medium and high phenolic content, respectively.
Changes in carbohydrate intake after intervention periods
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
Post-HPCPost-MPCPost-LPCBaseline
Carbohydrateintake(g/day)
290
280
270
260
250
240
*
*P < 0.001, Tukey, t test
LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low, medium and high phenolic content, respectively.
P < 0.001 for linear trend; * P< 0.05 versus LPC, †
P< 0.001 versus MPC
2000
Change(%)
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Hydroxytyrosol * †
*
Type of olive oil administered
HPCMPCLPC
Change(%)
1500
1000
500
0
Tyrosol
* †
*
The EUROLIVE Study. Results-Urinary tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol as markers of Compliance
LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low, medium and high phenolic content, respectively.
LPC
Olive oil intervention
MPC HPC
Post-int Change Post-int Change Post-int Ghange
Body mass index (kg/m
2
) 24.1 (2.8) 0.03 (0.31) 24.1 (2.8) 0.05 (0.33)) 24.0 (0.21) 0.01 (0.30)
SBP(mmHg) 123 (0.88) 122 (0.95) 123 (0.89) 123 (0.85) 123 (0.82) 123 (0.93)
DBP (mmHg) 75 (0.65) 76 (0.64) 76 (0.68) 76 (0.60) 76 (0.62) 76 (0.65)
Glucose(mg/dL) 86 (6.6) -0.29 (0.8) 86 (7.2) -0.29 (8.5) 86 (5.9) -0.08 (11.2)
Cholesterol(mg/dL)
Total 182 (37) 0.21 (21) 181 (36) 0.51 (24) 183 (37) 0.50 (17)
LDL 115 (34) 0.55 (19) 113 (33) -0.88 (21) 2115 (34) -0.41 (18)
HDL 49.2 (10.8) 0.99 (6.1) *
49.6 (10.3) 1.23 (6.5)*
50.4 (11.1) 1.76 (5.3)‡
Triglycerides(mg/dL) 91 (37) -6.1 (37) *
92 (37) -5.0 (41) 91 (32)
1.76 (5.3)‡1.23 (6.5)*
0.99 (6.1)*
-6.1 (37)*
-5.0 (41)
The EUROLIVE Study. ResultsThe EUROLIVE Study. Results
P for
linear
trend2
0.55
0.12
0.78
0.27
0.31
0.68
0.90-4.7 (32)*-4.7 (32)*
0.018
Total Cholesterol/HDL 3.88 (1.11) -0.09 (0.58) 3.81 (1.06) -0.10 (0.55) 3.81 (1.07) -0.12 (0.50) 0.005
LDL/HDL ratio 2.46 (0.95) -0.05 (0.49) 2.38 (0.88) -0.07 (0.49) 2.41 (0.93) -0-09 (0.45) 0.052-0-09 (0.45) †
-0.10 (0.55) †
-0.012 (0.50)*
-0.07 (0.49)*
0.018
0.005
0.052
Changes1
in Body Weight, Systolic and Diastolic Blood pressure, Glucose, and Blood Lipids after intervention
with olive oil with high (HPC), medium (MPC), and low ( LPC) phenolic content (mean (SD).
1
General linear model, *
P < 0.05; P<0.01, ‡
P < 0.001 versus the corresponding baseline, Tukey´s test.
2
General linear model withpost-intervention values adjusted by baseline values.
-0.09 (0.58)†
LPC
Olive oil intervention
MPC HPC
Post-int Change Post-int Change Post-int Change
F2-isoprostanes (µ g/L) 28 (4.9) 0.15 (4.9) 28 (4.3) -0.31 (5.4) 28 (6.4) 0.08 (5.3)
Uninduced dienes
(µmol/mol chol)
2.60 (0.96) -0.03 (0.83) 2.57 (0.92) -0.20 (0.91)‡
2.50 (0.91) 0.18(0.78) †
Hydroxyfatty acids
(µmol/L)
1.26 (0.18) -0.03 (0.51) 1.25 (0.18) -0.06 (0.49) 1.21 (0.17) 1.22 (0.026)*
8-oxo-deoxyguanosine
(nmol/24h-urine)
18.6 (0.63) -2.3 (0.75) ‡
17.9 (0.53) -2.9 (0.50)‡
18.1 (0.57) -2.1 (0.55)†
8-oxo-guanosine
(nmol/24h-urine)
21.6 (0.74) 0.9(0.76) 21.0 (0.72) 0.4 (0.71) 21.5 (0.74) 0.3 (0.81)
8-oxo-guanine
(nmol/24h-urine)
121 (6.5) 28 (13) 160 (14.9) 25 (7.8) 152 (9.6) 24 (14.3)
-
-2.9 (0.50)‡
-0.20 (0.91) †
-0.18 (0.78) †
-0.08 (0.49) †
-2.3 (0.75)‡
-2.1 (0.55)†
The EUROLIVE Study. ResultsThe EUROLIVE Study. Results
P for linear
Trend2
0.23
Antibodies against3
oxidized LDL(U/L)
590
(234;1397)
-0.20
(-80 ; 85)
636
(228;1416)
9.8
(-61;153)
557
(240;1403)
8.3
(-67 ;116)
0.60
0.001
0.004
0.16
0.23
0.39
Oxidized LDL(U/L) 47 (18) 0.94 (17) 46 (16) -1.85 (14) 45 (16) 45.7 (1.8)*
-3.5 (15) †
0.0140.014
0.001
0.004
1
General linear model, ‡
P<0.01, ‡
P < 0.001 versus the corresponding baseline, Tukey´s test.
2
General linear model withpost-intervention values adjusted by baseline values.
3
median (25th-75th percentile)
Changes1
in oxidative stress biomarkers after intervention of olive oil with high (HPC),
medium (MPC), and low (LPC) phenolic content (mean (SD)
LPC
Olive oil intervention
MPC HPC
Post-int Change Post-int Change Post-int Change
Endogenous
Paraoxonase (U/L) 165 (113) 0.27 (33) 164 (109) 0.13 (28) 165 (113) -2.46 (25)
.
Superoxide dismutase (U/L) 142 (20) -0.47 (14) 141 (20) -1.50 (13) 142 (20) 0.12 (14)
Glutathione peroxidase (U/L) 708 (152) -2.3 (119) 704 (134) -1.1 (106) 714 (162) -3.7 (126)
Glutathione reductase (U/L) 62 (10) -1.9 (18) 63 (10) -1.6 (19) 63 (11) 0.78 (20)
Reduced glutathione (µmol/L) 5.85 (0.64) 0.31 (0.40) ‡
5.85 (0.67) 0.28 (0.32)‡
5.87 (0.56) 0.33 (0.38)‡
Oxidized glutathione (µmol/L) 0.84 (0.18) -0.12 (0.17) ‡
0.82 (0.19) -0.14 (0.16) ‡
0.83 (0.17) -0.12 (0.18) ‡
Red/Ox glutathione ratio 7.9 (2.2) 1.74 (2.9) ‡
8.2 (2.6) 2.0 (3.4) ‡
8.1 (1.6) 1.5 (3.7) ‡
-0.14 (0.16)‡
0.31 (0.40)‡
0.28 (0.32)‡ 0.33 (0.38)‡
-0.12 (0.17)‡
-0.12 (0.18)‡
1.5 (3.7)‡
2.0 (3.4)‡1.74 (2.9)‡
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
P for
linear
trend2
0.77
0.53
0.31
0.02
0.70
0.69
0.77
No changes in plasma exogenous antioxidants (vit C, vit E, β-carot, Lycopene).
Changes1
in antioxidative biomarkers after intervention of olive oil with high (HPC),
medium (MPC), and low (LPC) phenolic content (mean (SD)
1
General linear model, ‡
P < 0.001 versus the corresponding baseline, Tukey´s test.
2
General linear model withpost-intervention values adjusted by baseline values, order and centre.
Paired comparisons among values after olive oils interventions
Mean of Differences (SEM)
Variable HPC vs LPC p MPC vs LPC p HPC vs MPC p
HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) 1.93 (0.77) 0.012 0.71 (0.66) 0.283 1.22 (0.64) 0.045
Uninduced dienes ( µmol/L) -0.060 (0.02) 0.013 -0.036 (0.02) 0.084 -0.024 (0.02) 0.218
Oxidized LDL (U/L) -4.48 (1.73) 0.010-2.96 (1.48) 0.046 -1.52 (1.43) 0.288
The EUROLIVE Study. ResultsThe EUROLIVE Study. Results
0.012 0.045
0.013
0.010
0.046
GLMM adjusted by basal values for each intervention period, olive oil administration order,center, and age
Results improved when difference of fat and carbohidrate from baseline are added to the model.
Table 4. Changes after olive oil interventions by centre
Variable Centre 1
(Barcelona)
(n =30)
Centre 2
(Copenhagen)
(n =28)
Centre 3
(Kuopio)
(n =30)
Center 4
(Bologna)
(n = 25)
Center 5
(Postdam)
(n = 38)
Center 6
(Berlin)
(n =32)
HDL cholesterol,
mg/dL
Low PC olive oil
Medium PC olive oil
High PC olive oil
0.92
(-1.1 to 2.9)
1.38
(-0.08 to 2.8)
2.20
(0.58 to 3.8)
1.50
(-1.3 to 4.2)
3.63
(-0.7 to 7.9)
1.49
(-1.1 to 4.1)
0.93
(-1.1 to 2.9)
0.38
(-1.9 to 2.5)
1.73
(-0.2 to 3.7)
0.54
(-1.4 to 2.5)
0.11
(-2.2 to 2.4)
2.62
(0.2 to 5.0)
1.28
(-1.1 to 3.7)
1.38
(-0.6 to 3.3)
2.58
(0.6 to 4.5)
0.20
(-1.3 to 1.7)
0.52
(-1.3 to 2.3)
0.58
(-1.8 to 2.9)
Oxidized LDL, U/L
Low PC olive oil
Medium PC olive oil
High PC olive oil
3.38
(-2.6 to 9.4)
-1.62
(-6.2 to 3.0)
-3.10
(-6.9 to 0.8)
2.7
(-6.7 to 12)
-2.87
(-10.3to 4.6)
0.40
(-7.2 to 8.0)
-0.49
(-4.2 to 3.3)
-1.93
(-5.9 to 2.1)
-1.64
(-4.9 to 1.6)
2.30
(-4.6 to 8.7)
-0.84
(-10.0to 9.8)
-8.69
(-15.8 to-2.2)
-5.53
(-11.8 to 0.7)
-2.12
(-6.6 to 2.4)
-8.75
(-14.0 to –2.9)
2.26
(-2.7 to 7.2)
-2.0
(-5.7 to 1.6)
-2.28
(-5.7 to0.48)
Hydroxy fatty
acids,*
nmol/L
Low PC olive oil
Medium PC olive
oil
High PC olive oil
10
(109 to 106)
-3
(-127 to 134)
-22
(-116 to 71)
40
(-86 to 166)
-13
(-124to 150)
-114
(-247 to 19)
33
(-75 to 141)
-19
(-130 to 93)
-65
(-195 to 65)
-45
(-222to 132)
-165
(-299 to -31)
-109
(-223 to -9)
-66
(-167 to 35)
14
(-87 to 114)
-14
(-85 to 56)
-130
(-273 to 13)
-69
(-189 to 30)
-76
(-174 to -4)
Consumption of 25 mL daily doses of all types of olive oil, as source of
raw fat, reduced lipid cardiovascular risk factors, improved the
glutathione antioxidant status, and decreased oxidative DNA damage
Consumption of the olive oil with the high phenolic content (virgin)
provided the highest benefits by increasing HDL cholesterol levels and
reducing the oxidative damage on lipids
Daily consumption of olive oils with medium and high phenolic
content decreased oxidative damage on lipids.
The EUROLIVE Study. ResultsThe EUROLIVE Study. Comments
Changes in biomarkers were modest, as was expected for the
administration of real-life doses of a single food, during three weeks.
Our results supports the body of research concerning that a rich-MUFA
diet can help to reduce triglycerides and raise HDL cholesterol, in
accordance with current cardiovascular guidelines.
The EUROLIVE Study. Comments
Our finding suggest an independent effect of olive oil phenolics
increasing HDL-cholesterol levels.
The enhancement of HDL-cholesterol related with the phenolic content
of the olive oil is in line with the results obtained after phenolic-rich
food conssumption in other human studies.
The EUROLIVE Study. Comments
Type of olive oil
HPCMPCLPC
DifferenceinHDL(mmmol/L)
0.065
0.052
0.039
0.026
0.01
0.00
Threshold
A 0.026 mmol/L increase in circulating HDL cholesterol levels is associated with a decrease from
1 to 3.6% in cardiovascular mortality, and with a 3.7% reduction of the risk to develop acute
myocardial infarction (Stampfer MJ et al. JAMA 1996; 276: 882-8).
Projected reduction in CHD risk associated with 25 mL olive oil
per day versus non olive oil consumption (%)
Type of olive oil
Biomarker Relative risk (95% CI)1
LPC MPC HPC
HDL-C 0.69 (0.47 to 0.99 per 10 mg/dL) 3.60 4.45 6.30
Triglycerides 1.33 (1.05 to 1.68 per 100 mg/dL) 1.72 1.41 1.33
1
From Jacobs DR et al. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 32-47 and Stampfer MJ et al. JAMA 1996; 276: 882-
888.
LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low (14.7 mg/Kg), medium (164 mg/Kg), and high (366 mg/Kg)
phenolic content, respectively.
These risk decrements were based upon data from cohort
studies. Whether a HDL or triglycerides reduction due to
olive oil and its phenolic consumption would lead to these
decreases in CHD risk has not been established.
Oxidative damage to lipids decreased in a linear form with the phenolic content of
olive oil, particularly in those markers directly associated with LDL oxidation.
Oxidation of the lipids present in LDL (measured by conjugated dienes and
hydroxy fatty acids) or direct oxidation of the LDL protein led to a change into
the lipoprotein conformation (measured by the levels of oxidized LDL) by which
the LDL is more able to enter in the monocyte/macrophage system, inside the
arterial wall, and promote the atherosclerotic process.
Circulating ox-LDL levels show a positive relationship with the severity of
acute coronary syndromes and are biomarkers for CHD risk.
The EUROLIVE Study. Comments
Mechanisms involved could be the own antioxidant activity of the phenolic
compounds and the combined protective effect of both the phenolic and the
MUFA content of the olive oil
Phenolic compounds
in LDL
Levels of oleic acid and antioxidants in LDL after
sustained (1 week, 25ml/day) doses of virgin olive oil
8.5ng/mgprotein
7.0
5.5
4.0
Baseline Post-intervention
†
10
8.5
µg/mgprotein
7.0
5.5
4.0
Vit E in LDL
†
10
*
Oleic acid in LDL
22
20
18
16
14
Gimeno et al. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56:114-120
12
%ofTotalfat
22
The susceptibility of LDL to
oxidation depends not only
on its fatty content, but also
of the LDL content of
antioxidants, such as vitamin
E and phenolic compounds
(Fuller CJ, Jialal I. Am J Clin Nutr.
1994; 60:1010-3).
B
a
Olive oil intervention
HPCMPCLPC
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
Change(%)frombaseline
80
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
A
a
HPCMPCLPC
Olive oil intervention
Changes in the total phenolic content of the LDL are modulated by olive oil
phenolic compounds
at 1h (A), and after 4 days (B) of 25 mL/day consumption of olive oils with high (HPC, 360
mg/Kg), medium (164 mg/Kg), and low (2.7 mg/Kg) phenolic content
P = 0.032 for linear trend P = 0.042 for linear trend
a
P< 0.05 versus LPC
Covas MI et al. Free Rad Biol Med 2006
Hydroxytyrosol in plasma (µg/L)
403020100
Change(%)ofPCinLDL
200
100
0
-100
R = 0.780, P = 0.009A
Tyrosol in plasma (µg/L)
181614121086
Change(%)ofPC
inLDL
300
200
100
0
-100
R = 608, P = 0.036
B
R = 0.699, P = 0.011
Tyrosol in plasma (µg/L)
2220181614121086
Change(%)ofPCinLDL
400
300
200
100
0
-100
C
Relationship between tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in plasma and changes in the LDL
phenolic content
Covas MI et al. Free Rad Biol Med 2006
Projected reduction in CHD risk associated with 25 mL olive
oil per day versus non olive oil consumption
After HPC olive oil a mean decrease of –3.2 U/L in oxidized
LDL was observed
Although several studies reported a direct relationship between oxidized
LDL and CHD risk, the attributable CHD risk associated with a 1U/L
change of oxidized LDL is, at present, unknown.
In a recent study, the mean difference, in circulating oxidized LDL values
between CHD patients and healthy controls, measured using the same
antibody and method as in the present study, was 17 U/L.
Limitations of the study
The EUROLIVE Study. Comments
Inability to determine whether an interaction between olive oil components
and others from diet could account for the changes in cardiovascular risk
factors observed, which might affect the generalizability of the results due
to dietary differences among countries.
The overall inter-country consistency of the results, however, contributes to
the generalizability of the message.
Our design, did not allow modeling the first- and second-order possible
carryover effects.
The measurements of dietary intake relied on self-reporting and were
therefore subjective.
Although the trial was blinded, some participants might have identified the
low phenolic olive oil (LPC) or the high phenolic content (HPC) by their color
and taste and, not liking them, masking a lack of full compliance despite a
good overall compliance.
Consumption of all types of olive oil provide benefits on the
cardiovascular risk profile, antioxidant endogenous defences
(GSH), and oxidative DNA damage, without modifying levels of
antioxidant endogenous enzymes.
The results of the study show that olive oil is more than a MUFA
fat.
The phenolic content of an olive oil can account for greater
benefits on blood lipids and oxidative damage than those provided
by the MUFA content of the olive oil.
The results of the EUROLIVE study provide evidence to
recommend the use of olive oil rich in phenolic compounds as a
source of fat in order to achieve additional benefits against
cardiovascular risk factors.
The EUROLIVE Study.
Conclusions
The EUROLIVE Study. Conclusions
Recommendations which stem from the EUROLIVE study are:
• Among the olive oils with a taste that better suits personal
preferences, the best choice is that with the highest phenolic
content.
• For health policy makers, the phenolic content of an olive oil
should be present in the olive oil labels.
The EUROLIVE Study.
Conclusions
The EUROLIVE Study. Recommendations
Olive oils with high phenolic content are stronger, and, in general
more bitter and greener than those with low phenolic content.
Olive oil must not be taken as a medicine.
Daily consumption of high phenolic olive oil did not compromise the
endogenous antioxidant enzymes. In some studies, polyphenol-rich food and
antioxidant supplementation led to a decrease in these enzymes, presumably
due to a lack of activation of their production by the decrease in free
radicals.
This decrease has been considered a negative effect in situations of free radical
production, such as exercise, in which the role of the antioxidant enzymes is
crucial in counteracting oxidative damage
The absence of changes in plasma antioxidant vitamins suggests an
independent effect of phenolic compounds from olive oil on oxidative
damage.
The EUROLIVE Study
THE EFFECT OF OLIVE OIL CONSUMPTION ON OXIDATIVE DAMAGE IN EUROPEAN
POPULATIONS. The EUROLIVE Study
IMIM
UBGL
KEPKA
DIfE
RHK
UKU
EUC
UB
JLB
UBER
EUROLIVE Investigators:
Institut Municipal d´Investigació Mèdica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain:
Lipids and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Unit: Covas MI (Study
Coordinator), Marrugat J, Fitó M, Elosua R, Schröder H, Vila J. Cladellas M.
Pharmacology Research Unit, de la Torre R, Farré-Albaladejo M.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital
Copenhagen, Denmark:
Poulsen H E (Centre Coordinator), Weimann A.
Research Institute of Public Health, University of Kuopio, Finland: Salonen
JT (Centre Coordinator), Konttinen A, Nyyssönen K Mursu J; Rissanen T,
Tuomainen T-P, Valkonen V-P, Virtanen J.
Centro per lo Studio dell'Arteriosclerosi e delle Malattie
Dismetaboliche"GC Descovich". Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e
Biotecnologia Applicata.Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy:
Gaddi A (Centre Coordinator), D’Addato S, Fiorito A, Grandi E, Linarello S,
Nascetti S, Sangiorgi Z
German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany:
Zunft, H-J F (Centre Coordinator), Koebnick C, Machowetz A
Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Charité-University Medicine of Berlin,
Germany:
Kiesewetter H (Centre Coordinator), Bäumler H
Department of Nutrition and Bromatology. University of
Barcelona, Spain:
López-Sabater C, Lamuela-Raventós R, de la Torre K,
Castellote AI
Oy Jurilab, Kuopio, Finland:
Kaikkonen J
oxldl post- MPC intervention interven (U/L)
120100806040200
Ab-oxLDLpost-MPCintervention(U/L)
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
-1000
oxldl post- LPC intervention (U/L)
140120100806040200
Ab-oxLDLpost-LPCintervention(U/L)
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
-1000
oxLDL at baseline (U/L)
120100806040200
Ab-oxLDLatbaseline(U/L)
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
-1000
oxLDL post- HPC intervention (U/L)
140120100806040200
Ab-oxldlpost-HPCintervention(U/L)
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
-1000
R = -0.264, P < 0.001
R = -0.210, P =0.005
R = -0.201, P =0.007
R = -0.213, P =0.004
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
Antioxidative Biomarkers after HPC, MPC, and LPC intervention periods
Exogenous
Ascorbic acid (µmol/L) 62 (1.6) 62 (1.6) 61 (1.7) 59 (1.6) 61 (1.7) 61 (1.5)
α-tocopherol (µmol/L) 25 (0.48) 25 (0.47) 25 (0.49) 25 (0.48) 25 (0.48) 25 (0.48)
β-carotene (µmol/L) 0.41 (0.024) 0.38 (0.020) 0.40 (0.021) 0.41 (0.026) 0.42 (0.027) 0.40 (0.023)
Lycopene (µmol/L) 0.45 (0.017) 0.44 (0.017) 0.43 (0.016) 0.45 (0.017) 0.45 (0.017) 0.44 (0.015)
Enterolactone (µmol/L) 17 (1.6) 20 (1.9) 17 (1.5) 21 (2.3)*
17 (1.5) 18 (1.4)
Enterodiol (µmol/L) 3.3 (1.2) 3.7 (0.89) 2.2 (0.50) 5.9 (1.9)*
2.7 (0.72) 2.8 (0.73)
Values are mean (SEM), except for antibodies against oxidized LDL which are expressed in median (25th
-75th
percentile).
Models adjusted by order of administration of olive oil and tyrosol post -intervention values.
*
P < 0.05versus the corresponding baseline, Tukey´s test
Pre-int Post-int Pre-int Post-int Pre-int Post-int
LPC MPC HPC
Olive oil intervention
5.9 (1.9)*
21 (2.3)*
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
*80
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
*
A
Olive oil intervention
HighPCMedium PCLow PC
Change(ng/gFA)frombaseline
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
B
Changes in the phenolic content of the LDL after a single dose of 40 mL (A) and after sustained
doses (25 mL/day, 4 days) of similar olive oils but with differences in their phenolic content
(PC)
Basal characteristics, glucose, lipid profile, and oxidative stress biomarkers at the beginning of the study by
subgroups of order of olive oil administration according to an intent-to treat analyis.
Order 1
(n=67)
Order 2
(n=68)
Order 3
(n=65)
Age (years) 33.4 (11.2) 34.3 (11.0) 31.9 (10.8)
BMI (Kg/m2) 23.7 (2.8) 23.8 (2.5) 24.0 (3.2)
Physical activity (kcal/day) 312 (250) 294 (248) 288 (207)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 125 (14.4) 125 (11.1) 123 (12.7)
Diastolic blood pressure 77 (7.6) 78 (8.2) 76 (8.5)
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.84 (0.96) 4.77 (1.06) 4.61 (1.09)
LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 3.11(0.93) 3.08 (0.93) 2.95 (0.98)
HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 46.9 (11.3) 46.4 (10.3) 48.5 (11.9)
Triglycerides (mmol/L) 102 (53) 1.2 (0.4) 1.0 (0.5)
Glucose (mmolL) 85 (9.4) 86 (10.4) 86 (9.4)
Oxidized LDL (U/L) 51 (26) 49 (20) 48 (22)
Antibodies against oxidized LDL (U/L) *
787 (120)* 1104 (153) 1092 (149)
Hydroxyfatty acids (µmol/L) 1.3 (0.33) 1.35 (0.46) 1.30 (0.57)
F2
-isoprostanes (µg/L) 30.6 (5.8) 29.1 (5.9) 31.6 (7.6)
Uninduced dienes (µmol/L) 11.3 (3.6) 11.4 (3.0) 12.1 (3.7)
8-oxo-deoxyguanosine (nmol/24h) 22.4 (8.2) 20.9 (8.0) 17.6 (6.6)*
8-oxo-guanosine (nmol/24h) 23.1 (9.5) 22.5 (8.4) 20.0 (8.6)
8-oxo-guanine (nmol/24h) 158 (100) 137 (84) 123 (92)
Values are men (SD). Order 1, High, medium , and low phenolic content olive oil; Order 2, medium, low, and high phenolic content olive oil; Order 3,low, high, and medium
phenolic content olive oil.. *
P < 0.05 versus order 1 group.
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
Antioxidant status at the beginning of the study by subgroups of subjects depending on the order of olive oil administration
according to an intent-to treat analysis
Order 1
(n=61)
Order 2
(n=63)
Order 3
(n=58)
Endogenous
Superoxide dismutase (U/L) 142 (21) 144 (22) 140 (19)
Glutathione peroxidase (U/L) 719 (183) 686 (133) 692 (184)
Glutathione reductase (U/L) 64 (17) 64 (16) 64(16)
Reduced glutathione (GSH) (µmol/L) 4.71 (0.59) 4.53 (0.57) 4.61 (0.72)
Oxidized glutathione (GSSG) (µmol/L) 1.24 (0.12) 1.26 (0.12) 1.24 (0.12)
GSH/GSSG ratio 3.85 (0.62) 3.61 (0.57) 3.74 (0.71)
Paraoxonase 150 (95) 150 (90) 198 (142)
Exogenous
Ascorbic acid 61 (26) 60 (23) 62 (23)
α-tocopherol (µmol/L) 25.6 (5.7) 24.6 (6.3) 24.2 (6.8)
β-carotene (µmol/L) 0.45 (0.39) 0.40 (0.28) 0.35 (0.25)
Lycopene (µmol/L) 0.46 (0.23) 0.42 (0.20) 0.43 (0.22)
Enterolactone (nmol/L) 16.8 (18.1) 22.6 (24.9)* 21.8 (36.6)
Enterodiol (nmol/L) 1.51 (5.30) 1.54 (4.13) 2.60 (9.6)
Order 1, high, medium , and low phenolic content olive oil; Order 2, medium, low, and high phenolic content olive oil; Order 3,low, high, and medium phenolic
content olive oil.
The EUROLIVE Study. Results
Hydroxytyrosol (ug in 24h urine)
500040003000200010000-1000
F2isoprostanes(ng/L)
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
R =- 0.200, P < 0.01
Inverse relationship between plasma F2
-isoprostanes and hydroxytyrosol in urine after high
phenolic content olive oil (HPC) intervention period. Spearman´s correlation
Statistical analyses
•Normality of continuous variables was assessed by normal probability plots.
•One-factor ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to determine differences in basal characteristics
and nutrient intake among the three olive oil interventions.
•A general linear model for repeated measurements was used, with multiple paired comparisons corrected
by Tukey´s method, in order to assess differences among post-intervention values adjusted by baseline
values.
•The paired comparison of target concentrations post-intervention was carried out by a General Linear
Mixed Model (GLMM) with :
•Random effect: individual level of test subjects
•Fixed factor: the olive oil phenolic dose (high, medium, low) administered
•Covariates: basal values for each intervention period , olive oil administration order, age, difference
of fat and carbohydrate intake from baseline.
•An additional model with adjustment for 3-O-methyl, hydroxytyrosol levels was also fitted
The EUROLIVE Study. Methods
Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 for a two-sided test. Analyses were performed
using the SAS System for Windows release 8.02.
Paradoxes of Southern Europe
Mediterranean Paradox
Protective factors
Candidates: lifestyle factors
Diet Physical activity Psycosocial stress
Gene-environment interactions

More Related Content

What's hot

Butter is not a good choice for low carber
Butter is not a good choice for low carberButter is not a good choice for low carber
Butter is not a good choice for low carber
Reijo Laatikainen
 
Life Science Journal, 2012;9( 3)
Life Science Journal, 2012;9( 3)Life Science Journal, 2012;9( 3)
Life Science Journal, 2012;9( 3)nashwa eltablawy
 
Maximun Residu FAO
Maximun Residu FAOMaximun Residu FAO
Maximun Residu FAO
Rahardi Gautama
 
Pharmacokinetic characterization of angiotensin IV analogs with therapeutic p...
Pharmacokinetic characterization of angiotensin IV analogs with therapeutic p...Pharmacokinetic characterization of angiotensin IV analogs with therapeutic p...
Pharmacokinetic characterization of angiotensin IV analogs with therapeutic p...alenemccoy
 
Clarifying krill – what’s the hype? with Dr Nina Bailey
Clarifying krill – what’s the hype? with Dr Nina BaileyClarifying krill – what’s the hype? with Dr Nina Bailey
Clarifying krill – what’s the hype? with Dr Nina BaileyIgennus Healthcare Nutrition
 

What's hot (7)

Fatty acids profile
Fatty acids profileFatty acids profile
Fatty acids profile
 
Butter is not a good choice for low carber
Butter is not a good choice for low carberButter is not a good choice for low carber
Butter is not a good choice for low carber
 
Life Science Journal, 2012;9( 3)
Life Science Journal, 2012;9( 3)Life Science Journal, 2012;9( 3)
Life Science Journal, 2012;9( 3)
 
Maximun Residu FAO
Maximun Residu FAOMaximun Residu FAO
Maximun Residu FAO
 
Dietary fats
Dietary fats Dietary fats
Dietary fats
 
Pharmacokinetic characterization of angiotensin IV analogs with therapeutic p...
Pharmacokinetic characterization of angiotensin IV analogs with therapeutic p...Pharmacokinetic characterization of angiotensin IV analogs with therapeutic p...
Pharmacokinetic characterization of angiotensin IV analogs with therapeutic p...
 
Clarifying krill – what’s the hype? with Dr Nina Bailey
Clarifying krill – what’s the hype? with Dr Nina BaileyClarifying krill – what’s the hype? with Dr Nina Bailey
Clarifying krill – what’s the hype? with Dr Nina Bailey
 

Viewers also liked

QNet presents Ole Leaf Extract - 2011
QNet presents Ole Leaf Extract - 2011QNet presents Ole Leaf Extract - 2011
QNet presents Ole Leaf Extract - 2011
QNET Ltd
 
Inspiration & Motivation
Inspiration & MotivationInspiration & Motivation
Inspiration & Motivation
Mansoor Khan
 
11 Reasons to Take Ole Olive Leaf Extract by QNET
11 Reasons to Take Ole Olive Leaf Extract by QNET11 Reasons to Take Ole Olive Leaf Extract by QNET
11 Reasons to Take Ole Olive Leaf Extract by QNET
QNET Ltd
 
Présentation congrès 2011
Présentation congrès 2011Présentation congrès 2011
Présentation congrès 2011
3voie
 
Neufol( l methylfolate) Asma Saleem Product Manager
Neufol( l methylfolate) Asma Saleem Product ManagerNeufol( l methylfolate) Asma Saleem Product Manager
Neufol( l methylfolate) Asma Saleem Product ManagerAsma Saleem
 
Folic acid and B12 do not prevent CV events
Folic acid and B12 do not prevent CV eventsFolic acid and B12 do not prevent CV events
Folic acid and B12 do not prevent CV events
Reijo Laatikainen
 
Celltrex Coq10
Celltrex Coq10Celltrex Coq10
Celltrex Coq10
cgardnr123
 
1c9e1233 fe58-4dd30be12651
1c9e1233 fe58-4dd30be126511c9e1233 fe58-4dd30be12651
1c9e1233 fe58-4dd30be12651vinod singh
 
Super b feb_2012
Super b feb_2012Super b feb_2012
Super b feb_2012
GNLD-INTERNATIONAL
 
24 essentials of time manage
24 essentials of time manage24 essentials of time manage
24 essentials of time manage
Hazem Diab
 
Cardiovascular System
Cardiovascular SystemCardiovascular System
Cardiovascular System
Chintan Chavda
 
What skills should you be training? And what skills could you be selling? - ...
What skills should you be training?  And what skills could you be selling? - ...What skills should you be training?  And what skills could you be selling? - ...
What skills should you be training? And what skills could you be selling? - ...
David Christopher
 
Olive in our life
Olive in our lifeOlive in our life
Olive in our life
Maria Dimou
 
HR April 2013
HR April 2013HR April 2013
HR April 2013
Timothy Holden
 
Folic acid and Heart diseases
Folic acid and Heart diseasesFolic acid and Heart diseases
Folic acid and Heart diseases
Friska Mandalas
 
Unleash the Benefits of Olive Leaf
Unleash the Benefits of Olive LeafUnleash the Benefits of Olive Leaf
Unleash the Benefits of Olive Leaf
Barleans
 
Debt Collection Training in UAE
Debt Collection Training in UAEDebt Collection Training in UAE
Debt Collection Training in UAE
Sales Training Middle East
 
Neufol (L-Methylfolate)
Neufol (L-Methylfolate)Neufol (L-Methylfolate)
Neufol (L-Methylfolate)
Asma Saleem
 
Communication Skills
Communication SkillsCommunication Skills
Communication Skills
Hazem Diab
 
F:\Apicius\Lesson 2 Fats Olive Oil Nuts
F:\Apicius\Lesson 2 Fats Olive Oil NutsF:\Apicius\Lesson 2 Fats Olive Oil Nuts
F:\Apicius\Lesson 2 Fats Olive Oil Nuts
Alberto Fatticcioni
 

Viewers also liked (20)

QNet presents Ole Leaf Extract - 2011
QNet presents Ole Leaf Extract - 2011QNet presents Ole Leaf Extract - 2011
QNet presents Ole Leaf Extract - 2011
 
Inspiration & Motivation
Inspiration & MotivationInspiration & Motivation
Inspiration & Motivation
 
11 Reasons to Take Ole Olive Leaf Extract by QNET
11 Reasons to Take Ole Olive Leaf Extract by QNET11 Reasons to Take Ole Olive Leaf Extract by QNET
11 Reasons to Take Ole Olive Leaf Extract by QNET
 
Présentation congrès 2011
Présentation congrès 2011Présentation congrès 2011
Présentation congrès 2011
 
Neufol( l methylfolate) Asma Saleem Product Manager
Neufol( l methylfolate) Asma Saleem Product ManagerNeufol( l methylfolate) Asma Saleem Product Manager
Neufol( l methylfolate) Asma Saleem Product Manager
 
Folic acid and B12 do not prevent CV events
Folic acid and B12 do not prevent CV eventsFolic acid and B12 do not prevent CV events
Folic acid and B12 do not prevent CV events
 
Celltrex Coq10
Celltrex Coq10Celltrex Coq10
Celltrex Coq10
 
1c9e1233 fe58-4dd30be12651
1c9e1233 fe58-4dd30be126511c9e1233 fe58-4dd30be12651
1c9e1233 fe58-4dd30be12651
 
Super b feb_2012
Super b feb_2012Super b feb_2012
Super b feb_2012
 
24 essentials of time manage
24 essentials of time manage24 essentials of time manage
24 essentials of time manage
 
Cardiovascular System
Cardiovascular SystemCardiovascular System
Cardiovascular System
 
What skills should you be training? And what skills could you be selling? - ...
What skills should you be training?  And what skills could you be selling? - ...What skills should you be training?  And what skills could you be selling? - ...
What skills should you be training? And what skills could you be selling? - ...
 
Olive in our life
Olive in our lifeOlive in our life
Olive in our life
 
HR April 2013
HR April 2013HR April 2013
HR April 2013
 
Folic acid and Heart diseases
Folic acid and Heart diseasesFolic acid and Heart diseases
Folic acid and Heart diseases
 
Unleash the Benefits of Olive Leaf
Unleash the Benefits of Olive LeafUnleash the Benefits of Olive Leaf
Unleash the Benefits of Olive Leaf
 
Debt Collection Training in UAE
Debt Collection Training in UAEDebt Collection Training in UAE
Debt Collection Training in UAE
 
Neufol (L-Methylfolate)
Neufol (L-Methylfolate)Neufol (L-Methylfolate)
Neufol (L-Methylfolate)
 
Communication Skills
Communication SkillsCommunication Skills
Communication Skills
 
F:\Apicius\Lesson 2 Fats Olive Oil Nuts
F:\Apicius\Lesson 2 Fats Olive Oil NutsF:\Apicius\Lesson 2 Fats Olive Oil Nuts
F:\Apicius\Lesson 2 Fats Olive Oil Nuts
 

Similar to Aceite de oliva composicion y salud hecho por medicos barcelona 2006

Omega-3 Fatty Acids - Anas Shaikh - 13FET1006
Omega-3 Fatty Acids - Anas Shaikh - 13FET1006Omega-3 Fatty Acids - Anas Shaikh - 13FET1006
Omega-3 Fatty Acids - Anas Shaikh - 13FET1006
Anas Ejaz Yasmeen Shaikh
 
Cytotoxic Activity of Linum usitatissimum L. Essential oil against Lung Adeno...
Cytotoxic Activity of Linum usitatissimum L. Essential oil against Lung Adeno...Cytotoxic Activity of Linum usitatissimum L. Essential oil against Lung Adeno...
Cytotoxic Activity of Linum usitatissimum L. Essential oil against Lung Adeno...
AmalDhivaharS
 
Effect of Coconut Oil, Coconut Water and Palm Kernel Oil on Some Biochemical ...
Effect of Coconut Oil, Coconut Water and Palm Kernel Oil on Some Biochemical ...Effect of Coconut Oil, Coconut Water and Palm Kernel Oil on Some Biochemical ...
Effect of Coconut Oil, Coconut Water and Palm Kernel Oil on Some Biochemical ...
IOSR Journals
 
An Overview of Flax Seeds – Phytochemical Profile, Extraction & Dietary Benefits
An Overview of Flax Seeds – Phytochemical Profile, Extraction & Dietary BenefitsAn Overview of Flax Seeds – Phytochemical Profile, Extraction & Dietary Benefits
An Overview of Flax Seeds – Phytochemical Profile, Extraction & Dietary Benefits
AmalDhivaharS
 
Is cno healthy
Is cno healthyIs cno healthy
Is cno healthy
Laurence Eyres
 
Is coconut oil healthy
Is coconut oil healthyIs coconut oil healthy
Is coconut oil healthy
Laurence Eyres
 
Fatty acids profile
Fatty acids profileFatty acids profile
Fatty acids profile
Ajay Dorle
 
Fatty acids composition of three different vegetable oils (soybean oil, groun...
Fatty acids composition of three different vegetable oils (soybean oil, groun...Fatty acids composition of three different vegetable oils (soybean oil, groun...
Fatty acids composition of three different vegetable oils (soybean oil, groun...
Alexander Decker
 
عرض تقديمي أميرة 2018.ppt
عرض تقديمي أميرة 2018.pptعرض تقديمي أميرة 2018.ppt
عرض تقديمي أميرة 2018.ppt
MajdolenAhrki
 
Health_Benefits_of_Olive_Oil.ppt
Health_Benefits_of_Olive_Oil.pptHealth_Benefits_of_Olive_Oil.ppt
Health_Benefits_of_Olive_Oil.ppt
niksom
 
Evaluation of anti atherosclerotic activity of virgin coconut oil
Evaluation of anti atherosclerotic activity of virgin coconut oilEvaluation of anti atherosclerotic activity of virgin coconut oil
Evaluation of anti atherosclerotic activity of virgin coconut oil
Ram Sahu
 
Omega 3overview-professorphilipcalder-121230045819-phpapp01
Omega 3overview-professorphilipcalder-121230045819-phpapp01Omega 3overview-professorphilipcalder-121230045819-phpapp01
Omega 3overview-professorphilipcalder-121230045819-phpapp01Mecompany
 
#134 "Nutritional Aspects of Rice Bran Oil" - Dr. A.R. Sharma, 2014 at Wuhan,...
#134 "Nutritional Aspects of Rice Bran Oil" - Dr. A.R. Sharma, 2014 at Wuhan,...#134 "Nutritional Aspects of Rice Bran Oil" - Dr. A.R. Sharma, 2014 at Wuhan,...
#134 "Nutritional Aspects of Rice Bran Oil" - Dr. A.R. Sharma, 2014 at Wuhan,...
Solvent Extractors' Association of India
 
#61A 5th International Conference on Rice Bran Oil 24th - 25th May 2018, Hano...
#61A 5th International Conference on Rice Bran Oil 24th - 25th May 2018, Hano...#61A 5th International Conference on Rice Bran Oil 24th - 25th May 2018, Hano...
#61A 5th International Conference on Rice Bran Oil 24th - 25th May 2018, Hano...
Solvent Extractors' Association of India
 
#61A
#61A#61A
#61A
HardikT2
 
Dodecanoic acid in extra virgin coconut oil, may reduce the incidence of hea...
Dodecanoic  acid in extra virgin coconut oil, may reduce the incidence of hea...Dodecanoic  acid in extra virgin coconut oil, may reduce the incidence of hea...
Dodecanoic acid in extra virgin coconut oil, may reduce the incidence of hea...
banafsheh61
 
Facial Acne Therapy by Using Pumpkin Seed Oil with Its Physicochemical Proper...
Facial Acne Therapy by Using Pumpkin Seed Oil with Its Physicochemical Proper...Facial Acne Therapy by Using Pumpkin Seed Oil with Its Physicochemical Proper...
Facial Acne Therapy by Using Pumpkin Seed Oil with Its Physicochemical Proper...
Taghreed Al-Noor
 
INGRAPE Project
INGRAPE ProjectINGRAPE Project
Lipid evaluation
Lipid evaluationLipid evaluation
Lipid evaluation
Muhammad Luthfan
 
lecture_11._olive_oil.pptx
lecture_11._olive_oil.pptxlecture_11._olive_oil.pptx
lecture_11._olive_oil.pptx
niksom
 

Similar to Aceite de oliva composicion y salud hecho por medicos barcelona 2006 (20)

Omega-3 Fatty Acids - Anas Shaikh - 13FET1006
Omega-3 Fatty Acids - Anas Shaikh - 13FET1006Omega-3 Fatty Acids - Anas Shaikh - 13FET1006
Omega-3 Fatty Acids - Anas Shaikh - 13FET1006
 
Cytotoxic Activity of Linum usitatissimum L. Essential oil against Lung Adeno...
Cytotoxic Activity of Linum usitatissimum L. Essential oil against Lung Adeno...Cytotoxic Activity of Linum usitatissimum L. Essential oil against Lung Adeno...
Cytotoxic Activity of Linum usitatissimum L. Essential oil against Lung Adeno...
 
Effect of Coconut Oil, Coconut Water and Palm Kernel Oil on Some Biochemical ...
Effect of Coconut Oil, Coconut Water and Palm Kernel Oil on Some Biochemical ...Effect of Coconut Oil, Coconut Water and Palm Kernel Oil on Some Biochemical ...
Effect of Coconut Oil, Coconut Water and Palm Kernel Oil on Some Biochemical ...
 
An Overview of Flax Seeds – Phytochemical Profile, Extraction & Dietary Benefits
An Overview of Flax Seeds – Phytochemical Profile, Extraction & Dietary BenefitsAn Overview of Flax Seeds – Phytochemical Profile, Extraction & Dietary Benefits
An Overview of Flax Seeds – Phytochemical Profile, Extraction & Dietary Benefits
 
Is cno healthy
Is cno healthyIs cno healthy
Is cno healthy
 
Is coconut oil healthy
Is coconut oil healthyIs coconut oil healthy
Is coconut oil healthy
 
Fatty acids profile
Fatty acids profileFatty acids profile
Fatty acids profile
 
Fatty acids composition of three different vegetable oils (soybean oil, groun...
Fatty acids composition of three different vegetable oils (soybean oil, groun...Fatty acids composition of three different vegetable oils (soybean oil, groun...
Fatty acids composition of three different vegetable oils (soybean oil, groun...
 
عرض تقديمي أميرة 2018.ppt
عرض تقديمي أميرة 2018.pptعرض تقديمي أميرة 2018.ppt
عرض تقديمي أميرة 2018.ppt
 
Health_Benefits_of_Olive_Oil.ppt
Health_Benefits_of_Olive_Oil.pptHealth_Benefits_of_Olive_Oil.ppt
Health_Benefits_of_Olive_Oil.ppt
 
Evaluation of anti atherosclerotic activity of virgin coconut oil
Evaluation of anti atherosclerotic activity of virgin coconut oilEvaluation of anti atherosclerotic activity of virgin coconut oil
Evaluation of anti atherosclerotic activity of virgin coconut oil
 
Omega 3overview-professorphilipcalder-121230045819-phpapp01
Omega 3overview-professorphilipcalder-121230045819-phpapp01Omega 3overview-professorphilipcalder-121230045819-phpapp01
Omega 3overview-professorphilipcalder-121230045819-phpapp01
 
#134 "Nutritional Aspects of Rice Bran Oil" - Dr. A.R. Sharma, 2014 at Wuhan,...
#134 "Nutritional Aspects of Rice Bran Oil" - Dr. A.R. Sharma, 2014 at Wuhan,...#134 "Nutritional Aspects of Rice Bran Oil" - Dr. A.R. Sharma, 2014 at Wuhan,...
#134 "Nutritional Aspects of Rice Bran Oil" - Dr. A.R. Sharma, 2014 at Wuhan,...
 
#61A 5th International Conference on Rice Bran Oil 24th - 25th May 2018, Hano...
#61A 5th International Conference on Rice Bran Oil 24th - 25th May 2018, Hano...#61A 5th International Conference on Rice Bran Oil 24th - 25th May 2018, Hano...
#61A 5th International Conference on Rice Bran Oil 24th - 25th May 2018, Hano...
 
#61A
#61A#61A
#61A
 
Dodecanoic acid in extra virgin coconut oil, may reduce the incidence of hea...
Dodecanoic  acid in extra virgin coconut oil, may reduce the incidence of hea...Dodecanoic  acid in extra virgin coconut oil, may reduce the incidence of hea...
Dodecanoic acid in extra virgin coconut oil, may reduce the incidence of hea...
 
Facial Acne Therapy by Using Pumpkin Seed Oil with Its Physicochemical Proper...
Facial Acne Therapy by Using Pumpkin Seed Oil with Its Physicochemical Proper...Facial Acne Therapy by Using Pumpkin Seed Oil with Its Physicochemical Proper...
Facial Acne Therapy by Using Pumpkin Seed Oil with Its Physicochemical Proper...
 
INGRAPE Project
INGRAPE ProjectINGRAPE Project
INGRAPE Project
 
Lipid evaluation
Lipid evaluationLipid evaluation
Lipid evaluation
 
lecture_11._olive_oil.pptx
lecture_11._olive_oil.pptxlecture_11._olive_oil.pptx
lecture_11._olive_oil.pptx
 

Aceite de oliva composicion y salud hecho por medicos barcelona 2006

  • 1. EFFECT OF OLIVE OIL AND ITS PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS ON REDUCTION OF HEART DISEASE RISK FACTORS AND OXIDATIVE DAMAGE M.I. Covas Lipids and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit Institut Municipal d´Investigació Mèdica (IMIM). Barcelona. Spain Sessions dels Groups i Unitats d´Epidemiologia. IMIM. Maig 2006
  • 2. Background The benefits of olive oil consumption are becoming increasingly recognized. Recently, the FDA permitted a claim on olive oil labels concerning: “the benefits on the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) of eating about 2 tablespoons (23 grams) of olive oil daily, due to the monounsaturated fat (MUFA) in olive oil”. However, if the effect of olive oil can be attributed solely to is MUFA content, any type of olive oil, rapeseed oil, or or MUFA-rich food would provide the same health benefits. Olive oil is the main source of fat in the Mediterranean Diet Thus, Public Health implications exist as to whether a specific type of MUFA fat or olive oil should be recomended as individualized eating strategies for oxidative stress associated diseases prevention
  • 3. OLIVE OIL COMPONENTS • Major components: Fatty acids – Saturated (8-14%) – Monounsaturated (oleic acid 55-83%) – Poliunsaturated (4-20%) • Minor components: – Squalene, Sterols, triterpenes – Vitamin E, Beta-carotene – Phenolic compounds (tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, oleuropeine, lignanes). EUROPEAN OLIVE OIL MEDICAL INFORMATION LIBRARY
  • 4. TYPES OF OLIVE OIL OLIVES LEAF REMOVAL WASHING CRUSHING-MILLING PASTE MALAXATION PRESSURE OR CENTRIFUGATION VIRGIN OLIVE OIL OLIVE POMACE Refination Orujo de oliva Refination Refined olive oil Mixture Low phenolic content (10-30 mg/Kg) High phenolic content (150-400 mg/Kg) Low phenolic content (10-70 mg/Kg) Phenolic content (0-5 mg/kg) Pomace olive oil Common olive oil The phenolic content of an olive oil varies, depending on the cultivar, climate, ripeness of the olives at harvesting, and the processing system for the type of olive oil:
  • 5. Background Olive oil phenolic compounds show: •strong antioxidant properties against free radical generation and LDL oxidation in experimental studies • delayed the progression of atherosclerosis in animal models. Oleate-rich LDL is less susceptible against oxidative modification than linoleate-rich LDL. There is increasing evidence that dietary phenolic compounds can modulate lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Oxidative damage of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is linked pathogenically to a variety of diseases such as cancer and also to ageing Low density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation is a hallmark for atherosclerosis development.
  • 6. Olive oil phenolic compounds are bioavailable in humans Data regarding the benefits of olive oil phenolic compounds in humans from real-life daily doses of olive oil are controversial and scarce The protective effects on lipid oxidation in these trials being better displayed in oxidative stress conditions Carefully controlled studies in appropriate populations (i.e. oxidative stress conditions, or with a large sample size (in the case of healthy volunteers), are required to definitively establish the health properties of olive oil phenolic compounds in humans. Consensus report. Expert Panel International Conference of Olive Oil and Health. Jaen, Spain October 2004 Expert Panel. Pérez-Jiménez, Coordinator, et al, Eur J Clin Invest 2005;35:421-4
  • 7. THE EFFECT OF OLIVE OIL CONSUMPTION ON OXIDATIVE DAMAGE IN EUROPEAN POPULATIONS. The EUROLIVE Study (QRLT-2001-00287) Covas MI, Poulsen HE, Nyyssönen K, Zunft HFJ, Kiesewetter H, Gaddi A, López-Sabater C, Kaikkonen J, on behalf of the EUROLIVE Investigators IMIM UBGL KEPKA DIfE RHK UKU EUC UB JLB UBER Objective To assess the effect of three similar types of olive oil, but with differences in their phenolic content, on blood lipids, and the oxidative/antioxidative status in healthy human volunteers.
  • 8. 3.1.1 Characteristics of the olive oils Determination of phenolic content in several virgin olive oils (HPC)Virgin olive oil Picual from Jaen (Andalucia, Spain, 366 ppm of PC) Measurement of fatty acid profile and vitamin E Determination of fatty acid profile and vitamin E of several refined virgin olive oils from similar cultivar and soil (VLPC) Refined olive oil (similar characteristics to the virgin one) Mixture (MPC) Common olive oil 3.1 Protocol of management for Olive Oils
  • 9. Characteristics of the Olive Oils Administered Type of olive oil 750 430 580 Free acidity (% oleic acid) 0.03 0.08 0.18 Peroxide value (mEq O2 /kg) 4.12 5.89 11.28 Fatty acids (%) C14:0 0.01 0.01 0.01 C16:0 10.63 10.50 10.63 C16:1 0.88 0.86 0.88 C17:0 0.05 0.05 0.04 C17:1 0.09 0.09 0.09 C18:0 3.27 3.13 2.84 C18:1 79.08 79.80 80.60 C18:2 4.64 4.21 3.35 C20:0 0.39 0.39 0.35 C18:3 0.58 0.58 0.58 C20:1 0.26 0.25 0.25 C22:0 0.11 0.10 0.10 C24:0 0.01 0.02 0.02 α-Tocopherol (ppm) 229 228 228 Phenolic compounds (mg/Kg) 2.7 164 366 Squalene (mg/g) 3.0 3.2 3.4 β-sitosterol (mg/g) 1.4 1.5 1.5 The EUROLIVE Study
  • 10. Study population: 200 healthy non-smoker males recruited between December 2002 and July 2003 in 6 Centers of 5 European Countries (Denmark, Finland, Germany (2 Centres), Italy, and Spain). The EUROLIVE Study. Methods Eligibility criteria: to be healthy on the basis of clinical exanimation and laboratory analyses; willingness to provide written, informed consent; and to agree to the adherence to the protocol Exclusion criteria: -smoking -intake of antioxidant supplements - diabetes - hypertension -Hyperlipidaemia - any condition limiting mobility -obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2 ) -aspirin, or drugs with established antioxidant properties -celiac or other intestinal disease, life-threatening diseases, or any other disease or condition that would impair compliance.
  • 11. Persons invited to be screened n = 344 144 ineligible 98 Did Not Met Protocol criteria 46 Unwilling to Participate 68 Assigned to Order 2, (MPC, LPC, HPC) 200 Randomized 67 Assigned to Order 1, (HPC, MPC, LPC) 65 Assigned to Order 3 (LPC, HPC, MPC) 6 Out of Follow-up 3 Unable to adhere 2 Moved away 1 Collateral event 5 Out of Follow-up 2 Unable to adhere 2 Moved away 1 Collateral event 7 Out of Follow-up 4 Unable to adhere 1 Moved away 2 Collateral events 61 Included in the Analysis 63 Included in the Analysis 58 Included in the Analysis Flow-chart describing progress of participants through the EUROLIVE Study LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low, medium and high phenolic content, respectively. The EUROLIVE Study. Methods
  • 12. Latin Square for three treatments in the cross-over clinical trial Examination Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Blood collection Anthropometric measures Order 1 HPC WO MPC WO LPC Order 2 WO MPC WO LPC WO HPC Order 3 WO LPC WO HPC WO MPC LPC, MPC, and HPC: olive oils with low, medium, and high phenolic content WO: wash-out period, (2 weeks) .Intervention periods 3 weeks (25 mL/day olive oil ingestion Examination number (general measurements and/or blood collection): 1, baseline; 2, post-first washout; 3, post-first intervention; 4, post-second washout; 5, post-second intervention; 6, post-third washout; 7, post-third intervention . 3DDR 3DDR 3DDR 3DDR FHD/PA PA The EUROLIVE Study. Methods WO
  • 13. Outcome measurements in the Clinical Trials Urinary tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol, the major olive oil phenolic compounds, as markers of compliance Oxidative markers Lipid oxidation F2 isoprostanes (pl) OH-Fatty acids (pl) Conjugated dienes (LDL) Oxidized LDL (pl) Antibodies against oxidized LDL (s)) DNA and RNA oxidation 8-oxo-dGuo (u) 8-oxo-Guo(u) 8-oxo-Gua (u) Antioxidative markers Endogenous SOD (b) GSH-Px (pl) GR (pl) GSH/GSSG (b) Enterolactone (s) PON (s) Exogenous AA (pl) Tocopherol (pl) β-carotene (pl) Lycopene (pl) Lipid status: Fatty acids in LDL; Serum Cholesterol, LDL, HDL The EUROLIVE Study. Methods 3-O-methyl-hydroxytyrosol in urine as a marker of the individual bioavailability and metabolic capacity of the hydroxytyrosol ingested.
  • 14. No differences at baseline were observed among the three groups of olive oil administration order: •For energy, macronutrients, or for the main antioxidant (vit E, beta- carotene...) or pro-oxidant intake (iron). •For the evaluated end-points, with the exception of low levels of Ab- oxLDL in order 1 group and 8-dGuo in order 3 group (P<0.05). The EUROLIVE Study. Results No carryover effect, examined through the interaction treatment by period in the models, was observed for any outcome. No changes in daily energy expenditure in leisure time physical activity were observed from the beginning to the end of the study (mean values, 282 vs 275 kcal/day). Diet was similar in the three groups during each type of olive oil administration.
  • 15. Mean daily energy consumption (SD) and selected nutrient intake (SD) according olive oil intervention Olive Oil Nutrient Low phenolics Medium phenolics High phenolics Energy (kcal) 2212 (690.6) 2228 (741.4) 2245 (650.0) Carbohydrate (%)* 48.4 (27.6) 46.2 (9.5) 46.3 (9.3) Protein (%)* 15.3 (3.3) 15.6 (3.7) 15.4 (3.6) Total Fat (%)* 36.2 (8.1) 36.2 (8.1) 36.1 (8.2) Saturated fat (%)* 12.6 (3.5) 12.6 (3.5) 12.8 (3.6) Monounsaturated fat (%)* 14.6 (4.4) 14.7 (4.7) 14.7 (4.6) Polyunsaturated fat (%)* 4.9 (2.0) 4.9 (1.9) 4.8 (1.9) Vitamin C (mg) 102 (71.4) 104 (73.2) 115 (96.5) Vitamin E (mg) 9.2 (4.8) 9.2 (5.6) 8.9 (4.9) ß-carotene (mg) 2.4 (2.6) 2.6 (3.0) 2.2 (2.3) *Expressed in percentage of total energy intake The EUROLIVE Study. Results
  • 16. Changes in total fat after intervention periods Post-HPCPost-MPCPost-LPCBaseline Totalfat(g) 110 100 90 80 * * * * P < 0.001, Tukey´s test The EUROLIVE Study. Results LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low, medium and high phenolic content, respectively.
  • 17. Changes in carbohydrate intake after intervention periods The EUROLIVE Study. Results Post-HPCPost-MPCPost-LPCBaseline Carbohydrateintake(g/day) 290 280 270 260 250 240 * *P < 0.001, Tukey, t test LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low, medium and high phenolic content, respectively.
  • 18. P < 0.001 for linear trend; * P< 0.05 versus LPC, † P< 0.001 versus MPC 2000 Change(%) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Hydroxytyrosol * † * Type of olive oil administered HPCMPCLPC Change(%) 1500 1000 500 0 Tyrosol * † * The EUROLIVE Study. Results-Urinary tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol as markers of Compliance LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low, medium and high phenolic content, respectively.
  • 19. LPC Olive oil intervention MPC HPC Post-int Change Post-int Change Post-int Ghange Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 24.1 (2.8) 0.03 (0.31) 24.1 (2.8) 0.05 (0.33)) 24.0 (0.21) 0.01 (0.30) SBP(mmHg) 123 (0.88) 122 (0.95) 123 (0.89) 123 (0.85) 123 (0.82) 123 (0.93) DBP (mmHg) 75 (0.65) 76 (0.64) 76 (0.68) 76 (0.60) 76 (0.62) 76 (0.65) Glucose(mg/dL) 86 (6.6) -0.29 (0.8) 86 (7.2) -0.29 (8.5) 86 (5.9) -0.08 (11.2) Cholesterol(mg/dL) Total 182 (37) 0.21 (21) 181 (36) 0.51 (24) 183 (37) 0.50 (17) LDL 115 (34) 0.55 (19) 113 (33) -0.88 (21) 2115 (34) -0.41 (18) HDL 49.2 (10.8) 0.99 (6.1) * 49.6 (10.3) 1.23 (6.5)* 50.4 (11.1) 1.76 (5.3)‡ Triglycerides(mg/dL) 91 (37) -6.1 (37) * 92 (37) -5.0 (41) 91 (32) 1.76 (5.3)‡1.23 (6.5)* 0.99 (6.1)* -6.1 (37)* -5.0 (41) The EUROLIVE Study. ResultsThe EUROLIVE Study. Results P for linear trend2 0.55 0.12 0.78 0.27 0.31 0.68 0.90-4.7 (32)*-4.7 (32)* 0.018 Total Cholesterol/HDL 3.88 (1.11) -0.09 (0.58) 3.81 (1.06) -0.10 (0.55) 3.81 (1.07) -0.12 (0.50) 0.005 LDL/HDL ratio 2.46 (0.95) -0.05 (0.49) 2.38 (0.88) -0.07 (0.49) 2.41 (0.93) -0-09 (0.45) 0.052-0-09 (0.45) † -0.10 (0.55) † -0.012 (0.50)* -0.07 (0.49)* 0.018 0.005 0.052 Changes1 in Body Weight, Systolic and Diastolic Blood pressure, Glucose, and Blood Lipids after intervention with olive oil with high (HPC), medium (MPC), and low ( LPC) phenolic content (mean (SD). 1 General linear model, * P < 0.05; P<0.01, ‡ P < 0.001 versus the corresponding baseline, Tukey´s test. 2 General linear model withpost-intervention values adjusted by baseline values. -0.09 (0.58)†
  • 20. LPC Olive oil intervention MPC HPC Post-int Change Post-int Change Post-int Change F2-isoprostanes (µ g/L) 28 (4.9) 0.15 (4.9) 28 (4.3) -0.31 (5.4) 28 (6.4) 0.08 (5.3) Uninduced dienes (µmol/mol chol) 2.60 (0.96) -0.03 (0.83) 2.57 (0.92) -0.20 (0.91)‡ 2.50 (0.91) 0.18(0.78) † Hydroxyfatty acids (µmol/L) 1.26 (0.18) -0.03 (0.51) 1.25 (0.18) -0.06 (0.49) 1.21 (0.17) 1.22 (0.026)* 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine (nmol/24h-urine) 18.6 (0.63) -2.3 (0.75) ‡ 17.9 (0.53) -2.9 (0.50)‡ 18.1 (0.57) -2.1 (0.55)† 8-oxo-guanosine (nmol/24h-urine) 21.6 (0.74) 0.9(0.76) 21.0 (0.72) 0.4 (0.71) 21.5 (0.74) 0.3 (0.81) 8-oxo-guanine (nmol/24h-urine) 121 (6.5) 28 (13) 160 (14.9) 25 (7.8) 152 (9.6) 24 (14.3) - -2.9 (0.50)‡ -0.20 (0.91) † -0.18 (0.78) † -0.08 (0.49) † -2.3 (0.75)‡ -2.1 (0.55)† The EUROLIVE Study. ResultsThe EUROLIVE Study. Results P for linear Trend2 0.23 Antibodies against3 oxidized LDL(U/L) 590 (234;1397) -0.20 (-80 ; 85) 636 (228;1416) 9.8 (-61;153) 557 (240;1403) 8.3 (-67 ;116) 0.60 0.001 0.004 0.16 0.23 0.39 Oxidized LDL(U/L) 47 (18) 0.94 (17) 46 (16) -1.85 (14) 45 (16) 45.7 (1.8)* -3.5 (15) † 0.0140.014 0.001 0.004 1 General linear model, ‡ P<0.01, ‡ P < 0.001 versus the corresponding baseline, Tukey´s test. 2 General linear model withpost-intervention values adjusted by baseline values. 3 median (25th-75th percentile) Changes1 in oxidative stress biomarkers after intervention of olive oil with high (HPC), medium (MPC), and low (LPC) phenolic content (mean (SD)
  • 21. LPC Olive oil intervention MPC HPC Post-int Change Post-int Change Post-int Change Endogenous Paraoxonase (U/L) 165 (113) 0.27 (33) 164 (109) 0.13 (28) 165 (113) -2.46 (25) . Superoxide dismutase (U/L) 142 (20) -0.47 (14) 141 (20) -1.50 (13) 142 (20) 0.12 (14) Glutathione peroxidase (U/L) 708 (152) -2.3 (119) 704 (134) -1.1 (106) 714 (162) -3.7 (126) Glutathione reductase (U/L) 62 (10) -1.9 (18) 63 (10) -1.6 (19) 63 (11) 0.78 (20) Reduced glutathione (µmol/L) 5.85 (0.64) 0.31 (0.40) ‡ 5.85 (0.67) 0.28 (0.32)‡ 5.87 (0.56) 0.33 (0.38)‡ Oxidized glutathione (µmol/L) 0.84 (0.18) -0.12 (0.17) ‡ 0.82 (0.19) -0.14 (0.16) ‡ 0.83 (0.17) -0.12 (0.18) ‡ Red/Ox glutathione ratio 7.9 (2.2) 1.74 (2.9) ‡ 8.2 (2.6) 2.0 (3.4) ‡ 8.1 (1.6) 1.5 (3.7) ‡ -0.14 (0.16)‡ 0.31 (0.40)‡ 0.28 (0.32)‡ 0.33 (0.38)‡ -0.12 (0.17)‡ -0.12 (0.18)‡ 1.5 (3.7)‡ 2.0 (3.4)‡1.74 (2.9)‡ The EUROLIVE Study. Results The EUROLIVE Study. Results P for linear trend2 0.77 0.53 0.31 0.02 0.70 0.69 0.77 No changes in plasma exogenous antioxidants (vit C, vit E, β-carot, Lycopene). Changes1 in antioxidative biomarkers after intervention of olive oil with high (HPC), medium (MPC), and low (LPC) phenolic content (mean (SD) 1 General linear model, ‡ P < 0.001 versus the corresponding baseline, Tukey´s test. 2 General linear model withpost-intervention values adjusted by baseline values, order and centre.
  • 22. Paired comparisons among values after olive oils interventions Mean of Differences (SEM) Variable HPC vs LPC p MPC vs LPC p HPC vs MPC p HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) 1.93 (0.77) 0.012 0.71 (0.66) 0.283 1.22 (0.64) 0.045 Uninduced dienes ( µmol/L) -0.060 (0.02) 0.013 -0.036 (0.02) 0.084 -0.024 (0.02) 0.218 Oxidized LDL (U/L) -4.48 (1.73) 0.010-2.96 (1.48) 0.046 -1.52 (1.43) 0.288 The EUROLIVE Study. ResultsThe EUROLIVE Study. Results 0.012 0.045 0.013 0.010 0.046 GLMM adjusted by basal values for each intervention period, olive oil administration order,center, and age Results improved when difference of fat and carbohidrate from baseline are added to the model.
  • 23. Table 4. Changes after olive oil interventions by centre Variable Centre 1 (Barcelona) (n =30) Centre 2 (Copenhagen) (n =28) Centre 3 (Kuopio) (n =30) Center 4 (Bologna) (n = 25) Center 5 (Postdam) (n = 38) Center 6 (Berlin) (n =32) HDL cholesterol, mg/dL Low PC olive oil Medium PC olive oil High PC olive oil 0.92 (-1.1 to 2.9) 1.38 (-0.08 to 2.8) 2.20 (0.58 to 3.8) 1.50 (-1.3 to 4.2) 3.63 (-0.7 to 7.9) 1.49 (-1.1 to 4.1) 0.93 (-1.1 to 2.9) 0.38 (-1.9 to 2.5) 1.73 (-0.2 to 3.7) 0.54 (-1.4 to 2.5) 0.11 (-2.2 to 2.4) 2.62 (0.2 to 5.0) 1.28 (-1.1 to 3.7) 1.38 (-0.6 to 3.3) 2.58 (0.6 to 4.5) 0.20 (-1.3 to 1.7) 0.52 (-1.3 to 2.3) 0.58 (-1.8 to 2.9) Oxidized LDL, U/L Low PC olive oil Medium PC olive oil High PC olive oil 3.38 (-2.6 to 9.4) -1.62 (-6.2 to 3.0) -3.10 (-6.9 to 0.8) 2.7 (-6.7 to 12) -2.87 (-10.3to 4.6) 0.40 (-7.2 to 8.0) -0.49 (-4.2 to 3.3) -1.93 (-5.9 to 2.1) -1.64 (-4.9 to 1.6) 2.30 (-4.6 to 8.7) -0.84 (-10.0to 9.8) -8.69 (-15.8 to-2.2) -5.53 (-11.8 to 0.7) -2.12 (-6.6 to 2.4) -8.75 (-14.0 to –2.9) 2.26 (-2.7 to 7.2) -2.0 (-5.7 to 1.6) -2.28 (-5.7 to0.48) Hydroxy fatty acids,* nmol/L Low PC olive oil Medium PC olive oil High PC olive oil 10 (109 to 106) -3 (-127 to 134) -22 (-116 to 71) 40 (-86 to 166) -13 (-124to 150) -114 (-247 to 19) 33 (-75 to 141) -19 (-130 to 93) -65 (-195 to 65) -45 (-222to 132) -165 (-299 to -31) -109 (-223 to -9) -66 (-167 to 35) 14 (-87 to 114) -14 (-85 to 56) -130 (-273 to 13) -69 (-189 to 30) -76 (-174 to -4)
  • 24. Consumption of 25 mL daily doses of all types of olive oil, as source of raw fat, reduced lipid cardiovascular risk factors, improved the glutathione antioxidant status, and decreased oxidative DNA damage Consumption of the olive oil with the high phenolic content (virgin) provided the highest benefits by increasing HDL cholesterol levels and reducing the oxidative damage on lipids Daily consumption of olive oils with medium and high phenolic content decreased oxidative damage on lipids. The EUROLIVE Study. ResultsThe EUROLIVE Study. Comments
  • 25. Changes in biomarkers were modest, as was expected for the administration of real-life doses of a single food, during three weeks. Our results supports the body of research concerning that a rich-MUFA diet can help to reduce triglycerides and raise HDL cholesterol, in accordance with current cardiovascular guidelines. The EUROLIVE Study. Comments Our finding suggest an independent effect of olive oil phenolics increasing HDL-cholesterol levels. The enhancement of HDL-cholesterol related with the phenolic content of the olive oil is in line with the results obtained after phenolic-rich food conssumption in other human studies.
  • 26. The EUROLIVE Study. Comments Type of olive oil HPCMPCLPC DifferenceinHDL(mmmol/L) 0.065 0.052 0.039 0.026 0.01 0.00 Threshold A 0.026 mmol/L increase in circulating HDL cholesterol levels is associated with a decrease from 1 to 3.6% in cardiovascular mortality, and with a 3.7% reduction of the risk to develop acute myocardial infarction (Stampfer MJ et al. JAMA 1996; 276: 882-8).
  • 27. Projected reduction in CHD risk associated with 25 mL olive oil per day versus non olive oil consumption (%) Type of olive oil Biomarker Relative risk (95% CI)1 LPC MPC HPC HDL-C 0.69 (0.47 to 0.99 per 10 mg/dL) 3.60 4.45 6.30 Triglycerides 1.33 (1.05 to 1.68 per 100 mg/dL) 1.72 1.41 1.33 1 From Jacobs DR et al. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 32-47 and Stampfer MJ et al. JAMA 1996; 276: 882- 888. LPC, MPC, and HPC, olive oils with low (14.7 mg/Kg), medium (164 mg/Kg), and high (366 mg/Kg) phenolic content, respectively. These risk decrements were based upon data from cohort studies. Whether a HDL or triglycerides reduction due to olive oil and its phenolic consumption would lead to these decreases in CHD risk has not been established.
  • 28. Oxidative damage to lipids decreased in a linear form with the phenolic content of olive oil, particularly in those markers directly associated with LDL oxidation. Oxidation of the lipids present in LDL (measured by conjugated dienes and hydroxy fatty acids) or direct oxidation of the LDL protein led to a change into the lipoprotein conformation (measured by the levels of oxidized LDL) by which the LDL is more able to enter in the monocyte/macrophage system, inside the arterial wall, and promote the atherosclerotic process. Circulating ox-LDL levels show a positive relationship with the severity of acute coronary syndromes and are biomarkers for CHD risk. The EUROLIVE Study. Comments Mechanisms involved could be the own antioxidant activity of the phenolic compounds and the combined protective effect of both the phenolic and the MUFA content of the olive oil
  • 29. Phenolic compounds in LDL Levels of oleic acid and antioxidants in LDL after sustained (1 week, 25ml/day) doses of virgin olive oil 8.5ng/mgprotein 7.0 5.5 4.0 Baseline Post-intervention † 10 8.5 µg/mgprotein 7.0 5.5 4.0 Vit E in LDL † 10 * Oleic acid in LDL 22 20 18 16 14 Gimeno et al. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56:114-120 12 %ofTotalfat 22 The susceptibility of LDL to oxidation depends not only on its fatty content, but also of the LDL content of antioxidants, such as vitamin E and phenolic compounds (Fuller CJ, Jialal I. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994; 60:1010-3).
  • 30. B a Olive oil intervention HPCMPCLPC 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 Change(%)frombaseline 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 A a HPCMPCLPC Olive oil intervention Changes in the total phenolic content of the LDL are modulated by olive oil phenolic compounds at 1h (A), and after 4 days (B) of 25 mL/day consumption of olive oils with high (HPC, 360 mg/Kg), medium (164 mg/Kg), and low (2.7 mg/Kg) phenolic content P = 0.032 for linear trend P = 0.042 for linear trend a P< 0.05 versus LPC Covas MI et al. Free Rad Biol Med 2006
  • 31. Hydroxytyrosol in plasma (µg/L) 403020100 Change(%)ofPCinLDL 200 100 0 -100 R = 0.780, P = 0.009A Tyrosol in plasma (µg/L) 181614121086 Change(%)ofPC inLDL 300 200 100 0 -100 R = 608, P = 0.036 B R = 0.699, P = 0.011 Tyrosol in plasma (µg/L) 2220181614121086 Change(%)ofPCinLDL 400 300 200 100 0 -100 C Relationship between tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in plasma and changes in the LDL phenolic content Covas MI et al. Free Rad Biol Med 2006
  • 32. Projected reduction in CHD risk associated with 25 mL olive oil per day versus non olive oil consumption After HPC olive oil a mean decrease of –3.2 U/L in oxidized LDL was observed Although several studies reported a direct relationship between oxidized LDL and CHD risk, the attributable CHD risk associated with a 1U/L change of oxidized LDL is, at present, unknown. In a recent study, the mean difference, in circulating oxidized LDL values between CHD patients and healthy controls, measured using the same antibody and method as in the present study, was 17 U/L.
  • 33. Limitations of the study The EUROLIVE Study. Comments Inability to determine whether an interaction between olive oil components and others from diet could account for the changes in cardiovascular risk factors observed, which might affect the generalizability of the results due to dietary differences among countries. The overall inter-country consistency of the results, however, contributes to the generalizability of the message. Our design, did not allow modeling the first- and second-order possible carryover effects. The measurements of dietary intake relied on self-reporting and were therefore subjective. Although the trial was blinded, some participants might have identified the low phenolic olive oil (LPC) or the high phenolic content (HPC) by their color and taste and, not liking them, masking a lack of full compliance despite a good overall compliance.
  • 34. Consumption of all types of olive oil provide benefits on the cardiovascular risk profile, antioxidant endogenous defences (GSH), and oxidative DNA damage, without modifying levels of antioxidant endogenous enzymes. The results of the study show that olive oil is more than a MUFA fat. The phenolic content of an olive oil can account for greater benefits on blood lipids and oxidative damage than those provided by the MUFA content of the olive oil. The results of the EUROLIVE study provide evidence to recommend the use of olive oil rich in phenolic compounds as a source of fat in order to achieve additional benefits against cardiovascular risk factors. The EUROLIVE Study. Conclusions The EUROLIVE Study. Conclusions
  • 35. Recommendations which stem from the EUROLIVE study are: • Among the olive oils with a taste that better suits personal preferences, the best choice is that with the highest phenolic content. • For health policy makers, the phenolic content of an olive oil should be present in the olive oil labels. The EUROLIVE Study. Conclusions The EUROLIVE Study. Recommendations Olive oils with high phenolic content are stronger, and, in general more bitter and greener than those with low phenolic content. Olive oil must not be taken as a medicine.
  • 36. Daily consumption of high phenolic olive oil did not compromise the endogenous antioxidant enzymes. In some studies, polyphenol-rich food and antioxidant supplementation led to a decrease in these enzymes, presumably due to a lack of activation of their production by the decrease in free radicals. This decrease has been considered a negative effect in situations of free radical production, such as exercise, in which the role of the antioxidant enzymes is crucial in counteracting oxidative damage The absence of changes in plasma antioxidant vitamins suggests an independent effect of phenolic compounds from olive oil on oxidative damage. The EUROLIVE Study
  • 37. THE EFFECT OF OLIVE OIL CONSUMPTION ON OXIDATIVE DAMAGE IN EUROPEAN POPULATIONS. The EUROLIVE Study IMIM UBGL KEPKA DIfE RHK UKU EUC UB JLB UBER EUROLIVE Investigators: Institut Municipal d´Investigació Mèdica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain: Lipids and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Unit: Covas MI (Study Coordinator), Marrugat J, Fitó M, Elosua R, Schröder H, Vila J. Cladellas M. Pharmacology Research Unit, de la Torre R, Farré-Albaladejo M. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark: Poulsen H E (Centre Coordinator), Weimann A. Research Institute of Public Health, University of Kuopio, Finland: Salonen JT (Centre Coordinator), Konttinen A, Nyyssönen K Mursu J; Rissanen T, Tuomainen T-P, Valkonen V-P, Virtanen J. Centro per lo Studio dell'Arteriosclerosi e delle Malattie Dismetaboliche"GC Descovich". Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Biotecnologia Applicata.Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy: Gaddi A (Centre Coordinator), D’Addato S, Fiorito A, Grandi E, Linarello S, Nascetti S, Sangiorgi Z German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany: Zunft, H-J F (Centre Coordinator), Koebnick C, Machowetz A Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Charité-University Medicine of Berlin, Germany: Kiesewetter H (Centre Coordinator), Bäumler H Department of Nutrition and Bromatology. University of Barcelona, Spain: López-Sabater C, Lamuela-Raventós R, de la Torre K, Castellote AI Oy Jurilab, Kuopio, Finland: Kaikkonen J
  • 38. oxldl post- MPC intervention interven (U/L) 120100806040200 Ab-oxLDLpost-MPCintervention(U/L) 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -1000 oxldl post- LPC intervention (U/L) 140120100806040200 Ab-oxLDLpost-LPCintervention(U/L) 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -1000 oxLDL at baseline (U/L) 120100806040200 Ab-oxLDLatbaseline(U/L) 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -1000 oxLDL post- HPC intervention (U/L) 140120100806040200 Ab-oxldlpost-HPCintervention(U/L) 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -1000 R = -0.264, P < 0.001 R = -0.210, P =0.005 R = -0.201, P =0.007 R = -0.213, P =0.004 The EUROLIVE Study. Results
  • 39. Antioxidative Biomarkers after HPC, MPC, and LPC intervention periods Exogenous Ascorbic acid (µmol/L) 62 (1.6) 62 (1.6) 61 (1.7) 59 (1.6) 61 (1.7) 61 (1.5) α-tocopherol (µmol/L) 25 (0.48) 25 (0.47) 25 (0.49) 25 (0.48) 25 (0.48) 25 (0.48) β-carotene (µmol/L) 0.41 (0.024) 0.38 (0.020) 0.40 (0.021) 0.41 (0.026) 0.42 (0.027) 0.40 (0.023) Lycopene (µmol/L) 0.45 (0.017) 0.44 (0.017) 0.43 (0.016) 0.45 (0.017) 0.45 (0.017) 0.44 (0.015) Enterolactone (µmol/L) 17 (1.6) 20 (1.9) 17 (1.5) 21 (2.3)* 17 (1.5) 18 (1.4) Enterodiol (µmol/L) 3.3 (1.2) 3.7 (0.89) 2.2 (0.50) 5.9 (1.9)* 2.7 (0.72) 2.8 (0.73) Values are mean (SEM), except for antibodies against oxidized LDL which are expressed in median (25th -75th percentile). Models adjusted by order of administration of olive oil and tyrosol post -intervention values. * P < 0.05versus the corresponding baseline, Tukey´s test Pre-int Post-int Pre-int Post-int Pre-int Post-int LPC MPC HPC Olive oil intervention 5.9 (1.9)* 21 (2.3)* The EUROLIVE Study. Results The EUROLIVE Study. Results
  • 40. *80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 * A Olive oil intervention HighPCMedium PCLow PC Change(ng/gFA)frombaseline 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 B Changes in the phenolic content of the LDL after a single dose of 40 mL (A) and after sustained doses (25 mL/day, 4 days) of similar olive oils but with differences in their phenolic content (PC)
  • 41. Basal characteristics, glucose, lipid profile, and oxidative stress biomarkers at the beginning of the study by subgroups of order of olive oil administration according to an intent-to treat analyis. Order 1 (n=67) Order 2 (n=68) Order 3 (n=65) Age (years) 33.4 (11.2) 34.3 (11.0) 31.9 (10.8) BMI (Kg/m2) 23.7 (2.8) 23.8 (2.5) 24.0 (3.2) Physical activity (kcal/day) 312 (250) 294 (248) 288 (207) Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 125 (14.4) 125 (11.1) 123 (12.7) Diastolic blood pressure 77 (7.6) 78 (8.2) 76 (8.5) Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.84 (0.96) 4.77 (1.06) 4.61 (1.09) LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 3.11(0.93) 3.08 (0.93) 2.95 (0.98) HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 46.9 (11.3) 46.4 (10.3) 48.5 (11.9) Triglycerides (mmol/L) 102 (53) 1.2 (0.4) 1.0 (0.5) Glucose (mmolL) 85 (9.4) 86 (10.4) 86 (9.4) Oxidized LDL (U/L) 51 (26) 49 (20) 48 (22) Antibodies against oxidized LDL (U/L) * 787 (120)* 1104 (153) 1092 (149) Hydroxyfatty acids (µmol/L) 1.3 (0.33) 1.35 (0.46) 1.30 (0.57) F2 -isoprostanes (µg/L) 30.6 (5.8) 29.1 (5.9) 31.6 (7.6) Uninduced dienes (µmol/L) 11.3 (3.6) 11.4 (3.0) 12.1 (3.7) 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine (nmol/24h) 22.4 (8.2) 20.9 (8.0) 17.6 (6.6)* 8-oxo-guanosine (nmol/24h) 23.1 (9.5) 22.5 (8.4) 20.0 (8.6) 8-oxo-guanine (nmol/24h) 158 (100) 137 (84) 123 (92) Values are men (SD). Order 1, High, medium , and low phenolic content olive oil; Order 2, medium, low, and high phenolic content olive oil; Order 3,low, high, and medium phenolic content olive oil.. * P < 0.05 versus order 1 group. The EUROLIVE Study. Results
  • 42. Antioxidant status at the beginning of the study by subgroups of subjects depending on the order of olive oil administration according to an intent-to treat analysis Order 1 (n=61) Order 2 (n=63) Order 3 (n=58) Endogenous Superoxide dismutase (U/L) 142 (21) 144 (22) 140 (19) Glutathione peroxidase (U/L) 719 (183) 686 (133) 692 (184) Glutathione reductase (U/L) 64 (17) 64 (16) 64(16) Reduced glutathione (GSH) (µmol/L) 4.71 (0.59) 4.53 (0.57) 4.61 (0.72) Oxidized glutathione (GSSG) (µmol/L) 1.24 (0.12) 1.26 (0.12) 1.24 (0.12) GSH/GSSG ratio 3.85 (0.62) 3.61 (0.57) 3.74 (0.71) Paraoxonase 150 (95) 150 (90) 198 (142) Exogenous Ascorbic acid 61 (26) 60 (23) 62 (23) α-tocopherol (µmol/L) 25.6 (5.7) 24.6 (6.3) 24.2 (6.8) β-carotene (µmol/L) 0.45 (0.39) 0.40 (0.28) 0.35 (0.25) Lycopene (µmol/L) 0.46 (0.23) 0.42 (0.20) 0.43 (0.22) Enterolactone (nmol/L) 16.8 (18.1) 22.6 (24.9)* 21.8 (36.6) Enterodiol (nmol/L) 1.51 (5.30) 1.54 (4.13) 2.60 (9.6) Order 1, high, medium , and low phenolic content olive oil; Order 2, medium, low, and high phenolic content olive oil; Order 3,low, high, and medium phenolic content olive oil. The EUROLIVE Study. Results
  • 43. Hydroxytyrosol (ug in 24h urine) 500040003000200010000-1000 F2isoprostanes(ng/L) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 R =- 0.200, P < 0.01 Inverse relationship between plasma F2 -isoprostanes and hydroxytyrosol in urine after high phenolic content olive oil (HPC) intervention period. Spearman´s correlation
  • 44. Statistical analyses •Normality of continuous variables was assessed by normal probability plots. •One-factor ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to determine differences in basal characteristics and nutrient intake among the three olive oil interventions. •A general linear model for repeated measurements was used, with multiple paired comparisons corrected by Tukey´s method, in order to assess differences among post-intervention values adjusted by baseline values. •The paired comparison of target concentrations post-intervention was carried out by a General Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with : •Random effect: individual level of test subjects •Fixed factor: the olive oil phenolic dose (high, medium, low) administered •Covariates: basal values for each intervention period , olive oil administration order, age, difference of fat and carbohydrate intake from baseline. •An additional model with adjustment for 3-O-methyl, hydroxytyrosol levels was also fitted The EUROLIVE Study. Methods Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 for a two-sided test. Analyses were performed using the SAS System for Windows release 8.02.
  • 45. Paradoxes of Southern Europe Mediterranean Paradox Protective factors Candidates: lifestyle factors Diet Physical activity Psycosocial stress Gene-environment interactions