The IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR) is an open access online & offline peer reviewed international journal, which publishes innovative research papers, reviews, mini-reviews, short communications and notes dealing with Pharmaceutical Sciences( Pharmaceutical Technology, Pharmaceutics, Biopharmaceutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmaceutical/Medicinal Chemistry, Computational Chemistry and Molecular Drug Design, Pharmacognosy & Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Analysis, Pharmacy Practice, Clinical and Hospital Pharmacy, Cell Biology, Genomics and Proteomics, Pharmacogenomics, Bioinformatics and Biotechnology of Pharmaceutical Interest........more details on Aim & Scope).
All manuscripts are subject to rapid peer review. Those of high quality (not previously published and not under consideration for publication in another journal) will be published without delay.
The IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR) is an open access online & offline peer reviewed international journal, which publishes innovative research papers, reviews, mini-reviews, short communications and notes dealing with Pharmaceutical Sciences( Pharmaceutical Technology, Pharmaceutics, Biopharmaceutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmaceutical/Medicinal Chemistry, Computational Chemistry and Molecular Drug Design, Pharmacognosy & Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Analysis, Pharmacy Practice, Clinical and Hospital Pharmacy, Cell Biology, Genomics and Proteomics, Pharmacogenomics, Bioinformatics and Biotechnology of Pharmaceutical Interest........more details on Aim & Scope).
All manuscripts are subject to rapid peer review. Those of high quality (not previously published and not under consideration for publication in another journal) will be published without delay.
Patient-Centered Measures in Surgery and their Use in Alberta Trafford Crump
Brief update on a jurisdictional review of the use of patient-centered measures in surgery and survey of Alberta surgeons on their collection and use of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs).
Patient-Centered Measures in Surgery and their Use in Alberta Trafford Crump
Brief update on a jurisdictional review of the use of patient-centered measures in surgery and survey of Alberta surgeons on their collection and use of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs).
Role of Pharmacist in healthcare system_Pharmacistday_Proud to be a pharmacistMallikarjuna Mocharlla
Here I would like to discuss the Introduction, Overview, Pharmacy is an art of science, Separation of Pharmacy and Medicine, Manpower imbalance in pharmacy, The scope of pharmacy and the role of pharmacists, Pharmacist Oath of a pharmacist (present scenario)
Foreign Licenses to practice for Pharmacists:
All the countries around the world set a process for international graduates to be able to practice with these countries this process is called a License to practice examinations and here we discuss the most popular countries which are America, Canada and Australia:
1. America : NAPLEX 'North America Pharmacy License Examinations'
2. CANADA: PEBC 'Pharmacy Evaluating Board of CANADA'
3. Australia: APEC 'Australia Pharmacy Evaluating Board'
The Indo-American Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology of the journal uses recommended electronic formats for submitting articles, which helps speed up the overall process.Once an article is submitted, it undergoes an initial rapid screening by the editors of the Scopus indexing Journal.
Pharmacist-provided care can transform pharmacists from medication dispenser to clinical care team member.
Pharmacist-provided care is the future of pharmacy and patient-centered healthcare
What quality measures does the MCO have in placeSolutionManag.pdfformicreation
What quality measures does the MCO have in place?
Solution
Managed care organizations (MCOs) are responsible for ensuring that persons enrolled in their
plans receive quality health care. In addition, MCOs publicly funded through the Medicare and
Medicaid programs are required by State and Federal governments to meet certain quality
standards.
To fulfill their responsibilities, MCOs need ready access to a comprehensive array of evidence-
based clinical information and other clinical performance measures to enable them to evaluate
their providers\' performance and identify areas where improvement is needed. They also need to
know how their members feel about the care they receive and the way they are treated. Finally,
they need to ensure that both their providers and members are aware of the most recent
preventive care recommendations.
Valid, reliable, and cost-effective measurement tools must be available to make such
determinations, but these tools have not always been available. Furthermore, because the science
of performance measurement is relatively new, additional measures need to be developed and
those that have been developed can be improved. Therefore, to ensure that their enrollees in
MCOs receive high-quality care, MCOs need a reliable source to provide the most current and
scientifically sound tools.
In response to this need, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has funded
research to compile a database of evidence-based clinical guidelines and to develop clinical
performance measures, member satisfaction surveys, and preventive care recommendations that
can help MCOs meet their responsibilities. Additionally, AHRQ funds research and develops
performance measures and guidelines that MCOs, insurers, providers, and consumers can trust.
This report describes these tools and how they have been used and provides information on
where to learn more about them.
Background
Around one-half of insured Americans are enrolled in some form of managed care. However, as
the number of persons enrolled in MCOs increased in the 1990s, health care purchasers,
policymakers, and other stakeholders became concerned about the potential for health care
quality to diminish. In their view, the policies and practices imposed by MCOs to reduce what
MCOs define as unnecessary care might result in patients not receiving needed care. Therefore,
MCOs faced accreditation systems and other requirements to ensure that patients were receiving
the most appropriate care.
More recently, MCOs have had to address other emerging concerns such as: Rapid introduction
of new technologies, Data showing unexplained variations in the provision of care, Severe cost
pressures.
These factors have provided additional motivation to MCOs to develop systematic ways of
preserving and enhancing health care quality and cost-effectiveness.
Evidence-based practice guidelines and performance measures were developed to help ensure
that patients always receive the most appropri.
1. Editorial
(Pre-publication Draft)
Standards of Practice for Clinical Pharmacists:
The Time Has Come
Gary C. Yee and Curtis E. Haas
Key Words: clinical pharmacy, clinical pharmacist practice standards, process of care,
documentation, collaborative practice, maintenance of competence, professionalism, research
and scholarship.
Running Head: Clinical Pharmacist Standards
Address reprint requests to Gary C. Yee, Pharm.D., FCCP, BCOP , University of
Nebraska Medical Center, 986045 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-6045; e-
mail: gcyee@unmc.edu; or download from http://www.accp.com.
2. The lack of a standardized and reproducible practice by which clinical pharmacists optimize
patients’ medication-related outcomes has been an Achilles’ heel for the clinical pharmacy
discipline. Without a well-defined patient care process that is employed by clinical pharmacists
consistently and collaboratively across practice settings, other members of the health care team
have remained uncertain, and perhaps even doubtful, of what to expect from clinical pharmacists
and whether clinical pharmacists could reliably contribute to improved patient outcomes.
Researchers seeking to study the impact of clinical pharmacists on patient outcomes have been
hampered by the high degree of variability in clinical pharmacy practice—a situation that has
yielded the impression that “if you’ve seen one clinical pharmacist practice, you’ve seen just
that—one.” Even experienced clinical pharmacists themselves have widely divergent opinions
on the best approach for delivering patient care and the most fitting way to teach it to pharmacy
students and residents.
The publication by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) of Standards of
Practice for Clinical Pharmacists1
in this issue of Pharmacotherapy represents a major step in
addressing this issue. By setting forth a process of care that is focused on CMM (comprehensive
medication management),2
ACCP articulates a practice that clinical pharmacists and their
colleagues in other health professions can use as a basis for optimizing collaborative patient care.
This is consistent with efforts currently under way to develop a standardized approach to
collaborative clinical pharmacist practice in Europe.3
The Standards also delineates the
components essential to the clinical pharmacist’s documentation of the care process and patients’
medication-related outcomes. If this approach is 1) applied consistently in team-based patient
care settings, 2) taught to students, and 3) reinforced in postgraduate clinical training, the “if
you’ve seen one, you’ve seen [just] one” observation will seldom be uttered in the future.
3. The Standards is an extension of ACCP papers addressing the definition of clinical
pharmacy,4
clinical pharmacist competencies,5
professionalism,6
the desired qualifications of
pharmacists who provide direct patient care,7
and the insightful report from the ACCP
Professional and Public Relations Committee (published in this edition of the journal) advocating
the adoption of a consistent process of care.8
Hence, in addition to establishing the clinical
pharmacist’s process of care and providing guidance for documenting that care, the Standards
defines the broad foundation for the discipline: postgraduate training; board certification;
mechanisms that confer authority, responsibility, and accountability for one’s practice; expected
steps to ensure professional development and maintenance of competence; professional and
ethical standards; and the need for research and scholarship.
The Standards is a noteworthy publication for clinical pharmacy that has several
important applications. First, it stands as a reference for educators, preceptors, and accreditors in
designing and assessing clinical education and training. Second, for the benefit of other members
of the health care team, it outlines the clinical pharmacist’s professional capabilities and
commitment to providing collaborative patient care. Similarly, non-pharmacy disciplines have
published documents that effectively inform health professionals outside their field of the roles
and responsibilities of their practitioners.9
Finally, the Standards can serve as an important
resource for policy-makers involved in evaluating the role of clinical pharmacists in current and
emerging health care delivery models.
Publication of the Standards marks an important milestone for clinical pharmacy. The time
has come to codify the care provided by clinical pharmacists within collaborative, team-based
environments, thereby positioning them to more fully achieve their mission of optimizing
patients’ medication-related outcomes.
4. References
1. American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Standards of practice for clinical pharmacists.
Pharmacotherapy 2014;34:XXXX.
2. Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative. The patient-centered medical home:
integrating comprehensive medication management to optimize patient outcomes resource
guide, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative, 2012.
Available from http://www.pcpcc.org/sites/default/files/media/medmanagement.pdf.
Accessed March 8, 2014.
3. Mamo M, Wirth F, Azzopardi LM, Serracino-Inglott A. Standardising pharmacist patient-
profiling activities in a rehabilitation hospital in Malta. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2014;21:49-53.
4. American College of Clinical Pharmacy. The definition of clinical pharmacy.
Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:817-8. Available from
http://www.accp.com/docs/positions/commentaries/Clinpharmdefnfinal.pdf. Accessed
March 8, 2014.
5. Burke JM, Miller WA, Spencer AP, Crank CW, et al. Clinical pharmacist competencies.
Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:806-15. Available from
http://www.accp.com/docs/positions/whitePapers/CliniPharmCompTFfinalDraft.pdf.
Accessed March 8, 2014.
6. Roth MT, Zlatic TD. Development of student professionalism. Pharmacotherapy
2009;29:749-56. Available from
http://www.accp.com/docs/positions/whitePapers/devstuprof.pdf. Accessed March 24,
2014.
5. 7. American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Qualifications of pharmacists who provide direct
patient care: perspectives on the need for residency training and board certification.
Pharmacotherapy 2013;33:888-91. Available from
http://www.accp.com/docs/positions/commentaries/Commntry_BOR_DPC_phar1285.pdf.
Accessed March 8, 2014.
8. Harris IM, Phillips B, Boyce E, et al. Clinical pharmacy should adopt a consistent process
of direct patient care. Pharmacotherapy 2014;34(X):XXXX.
9. American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Standards of practice for nurse practitioners.
Available from
https://www.aanp.org/images/documents/publications/standardsofpractice.pdf. Accessed
March 8, 2014.