A talk to beginning graduate students. Why do you study? Role of research? What do graduate degrees signify? And a Magic Spell to help with (almost) everything...
This is Part 1, Part 2 discusses Science and how to do it.
A talk to beginning graduate students, Part 2.
This is about the fundamentals of knowledge, understanding and science, promoting the scientific method and Karl Popper's views. The remainder outlines the practice of a thesis work, from hypothesis through proposal onwards... And I shamelessly mock pyramidology and related fields...
This short powerpoint helps new university students to understand how academic journal articles are structured, and ways that they can quickly and effectively make sense of an article.
This document provides advice and information for completing a PhD degree. It discusses starting a PhD project, making progress, managing supervisors through weekly meetings, and dos and don'ts. It also covers writing a thesis, including managing language barriers and timelines. Finally, it outlines the viva voce exam process, including the purpose and roles of examiners and using one's thesis to defend their work. The overall document aims to guide and support PhD candidates through their degree.
This document discusses the format of a scientific journal article. It begins by explaining that journal articles are considered primary literature. It then outlines the typical sections of a journal article which include: the title, authors, abstract, keywords, introduction, materials and methods, results, tables/figures, discussion, and references. Each section is described briefly, with the title summarizing the study, the abstract concisely outlining the rationale, results and interpretation, and the references supporting the information presented.
This document provides tips and strategies for effectively reading academic papers. It discusses deciding what papers to read based on relevance and credibility. It recommends making best use of academic resources like preprint sites, blogs, and mailing lists to stay updated. It explains the importance of reading for breadth to understand the big picture and reading for depth to critically examine assumptions, methods, statistics and conclusions. The document concludes by discussing how to take notes and think creatively after reading papers to develop new research ideas.
A talk to beginning graduate students, Part 2.
This is about the fundamentals of knowledge, understanding and science, promoting the scientific method and Karl Popper's views. The remainder outlines the practice of a thesis work, from hypothesis through proposal onwards... And I shamelessly mock pyramidology and related fields...
This short powerpoint helps new university students to understand how academic journal articles are structured, and ways that they can quickly and effectively make sense of an article.
This document provides advice and information for completing a PhD degree. It discusses starting a PhD project, making progress, managing supervisors through weekly meetings, and dos and don'ts. It also covers writing a thesis, including managing language barriers and timelines. Finally, it outlines the viva voce exam process, including the purpose and roles of examiners and using one's thesis to defend their work. The overall document aims to guide and support PhD candidates through their degree.
This document discusses the format of a scientific journal article. It begins by explaining that journal articles are considered primary literature. It then outlines the typical sections of a journal article which include: the title, authors, abstract, keywords, introduction, materials and methods, results, tables/figures, discussion, and references. Each section is described briefly, with the title summarizing the study, the abstract concisely outlining the rationale, results and interpretation, and the references supporting the information presented.
This document provides tips and strategies for effectively reading academic papers. It discusses deciding what papers to read based on relevance and credibility. It recommends making best use of academic resources like preprint sites, blogs, and mailing lists to stay updated. It explains the importance of reading for breadth to understand the big picture and reading for depth to critically examine assumptions, methods, statistics and conclusions. The document concludes by discussing how to take notes and think creatively after reading papers to develop new research ideas.
This document provides guidance on effectively communicating data and research results. It discusses planning communication by knowing the subject, purpose, audience and setting. It also covers structuring communications through outlining and using a logical flow. Visuals should be used strategically to reinforce key points. Both oral presentations and written reports require clarity, with oral presentations focusing on a few main ideas and using visual aids to support points while engaging the audience.
This stack of slides describes my view on how to work as a PhD student. The presentation was targeted a Ubiquitous Computing audience, but is fairly generic in nature.
1) Writing research papers is an important skill that can improve one's career and impact.
2) It is best to start writing early in the research process to help crystallize ideas and get feedback from others.
3) The introduction should clearly state the problem and contributions while the body provides evidence to support the claims.
This document provides guidance on writing a research paper. It discusses why writing a research paper is important, including disseminating results, exchanging knowledge, career advancement, and personal satisfaction. It outlines the typical steps in the scientific writing process, including completing the research, writing the manuscript, submitting to a journal, and undergoing peer review. Finally, it provides detailed instructions on creating each section of a research paper, such as the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and more. The overall document serves as a guide for new researchers on how to structure, write and publish a scientific research paper.
The correct strategy is to submit your paper to one journal, and wait to hear if it is accepted. If it isn't then submit it to another journal.
Simultaneously submitting the same paper to multiple journals is considered duplicate submission, which is unethical. Withdrawing other submissions once one is accepted still constitutes duplicate submission. The proper process is to submit to only one journal at a time.
ES Series on Scientific Research 34
Source: http://www.elsevier.com/ethics/
This document provides an outline for a presentation on scientific research. It discusses four main types of scientific papers: theoretical papers, experimental papers, fabrication papers, and clinical papers. For each paper type, it describes the key elements and focus. It also discusses literature reviews, including their purpose and common mistakes. Additionally, it covers how to structure a scientific paper, including sections like the abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions. Finally, it provides tips for writing style, including using precise language, correct tenses, active and passive voice, and formatting sentences and paragraphs clearly. The overall document offers guidance on various aspects of writing and presenting scientific work.
The document provides guidance on writing clinical papers. It acknowledges that many papers are written to get published rather than to be read. It outlines common errors in clinical paper writing, including titles that do not match the study, abstracts that exceed word limits or lack important details, introductions that include irrelevant information or omit hypotheses, and methods, results, and discussion sections that do not clearly report on the study design and findings. The document emphasizes writing concisely and focusing on communicating results to readers. It encourages learning from rejections to improve papers for resubmission.
This document provides guidance on writing and reviewing research papers. It begins with acknowledging the recommended reading and then outlines the main goals of a scientific paper. Various document preparation systems are discussed as well as the standard structure for a research paper, including sections on the introduction, background, related work, and conclusion. The document concludes with guidelines on paper style, dos and don'ts, and how to approach reviewing a paper with the goal of improving it for publication.
The document discusses key aspects of conducting research and writing a research report. It addresses the importance of project management and having clear objectives. It also discusses the elements of a research report, including presenting the report as a story or argument. The document notes that a literature review is important to understand what is already known on a topic and to identify research gaps. It advises that a conclusion should discuss the significance of findings and their implications.
This document provides guidance for post-graduate students preparing to defend their thesis or final project. It discusses variations in the defense process between countries and institutions. It also addresses how defenses are evaluated, the range of questions students may face, and tips for ensuring success. Key points include outlining standards for outstanding, acceptable, and unacceptable work. It emphasizes the importance of internal consistency and addressing examiners' questions specifically for one's own university and research.
The document provides guidance on writing an effective thesis proposal. It explains that a proposal seeks to convince reviewers that a research project is feasible by demonstrating that the problem is important, the project is possible within the timeframe, and sufficient data is available. It recommends conceptualizing the proposal as a system with interdependent sections that each contribute something essential. Key sections include the research question, rationale, literature review, theoretical framework, and methodology. The document stresses justifying the importance and approach of the proposed research.
This document provides guidance on technical writing structure and how to avoid plagiarism. It discusses the importance of writing research findings in a way that others will read and understand them. It recommends that papers have a clear title, abstract, introduction stating the contributions, background information, description of the proposed idea, experimental results and discussion, and conclusions. The document advises generating ideas from a research notebook and giving proper credit to related work. It emphasizes conveying intuitions clearly and using examples before details. The goal is to effectively introduce the problem and solution to attract readers and convince them of the importance and insights of the work.
This document provides guidance on publishing research papers. It discusses when researchers should publish, what types of publications they should pursue, and how to select venues. The document emphasizes that writing should start early in the research process and be continually improved. It also offers tips on dealing with rejections, enhancing writing skills, and marketing published work. The overall message is that publishing is essential for researchers, and they must train intensively in effective written communication to disseminate their work and advance their careers.
This document provides information on writing resumes and CVs, including key differences between the two. Resumes are typically one to two pages and focus on employment history, while CVs can be longer and include additional details like education and achievements. The purpose is to get interviews by showcasing relevant qualifications. Effective ones are tailored to specific positions and highlight skills, experiences, and how the applicant meets an employer's needs. Various sections that can be included are described.
This document provides guidance on exploring research questions. It discusses that research questions should define the overall plan and scope of a project. The document outlines a process for moving from a general topic to specific research questions, including brainstorming questions in both structured and unstructured ways. Key steps involve clarifying concepts, stakeholders, goals and metrics; exploring "how" and "why" questions about the topic; and determining if questions are clear, focused, and complex enough to require analysis. Hypothesizing how others may challenge arguments is also recommended. Structured and unstructured brainstorming techniques are presented to generate potential research questions.
The poem describes Ulysses, an aging king who feels restless and desires further adventure and knowledge. He addresses his crew, urging them to set sail once more to explore beyond the known world. Though aged and weaker than in his youth, Ulysses maintains a determined spirit to continue seeking and learning until his death.
How to Choose a PhD Dissertation Topic For Economic Research? List out the Cr...PhD Assistance
This document provides guidance on choosing a dissertation topic for economic research. It outlines 7 criteria or steps to consider when selecting a topic: 1) Choose something you're interested in, 2) Get inspired by previous students' topics, 3) Seek recommendations from professors, 4) Choose something unique but not too complex, 5) Choose a small, specific topic, 6) Consider interdisciplinary topics, 7) Brainstorm ideas and focus the topic by creating a research question. The document emphasizes selecting a topic you're passionate about and one that is narrow enough to be manageable within the dissertation requirements. It also recommends exploring previous works for inspiration and getting feedback from advisors on topic ideas.
This document provides guidance on how to effectively read and analyze academic research papers. It outlines the key components one should consider when reading a paper, including being skeptical of the authors' claims, asking critical questions about the research problem, methodology, results and conclusions. The document also reviews the typical anatomy of an academic paper, covering the introduction, methods, results, discussion and references sections. Lastly, it recommends comparing the paper to similar research and archiving papers for future reference.
Explains two basic types of optimization problems for blends, namely the simpler where total contents have requirements, and the slightly more complicated where final concentrations have requirements. Both are linear programs that can reliably be solved in a spreadsheet, we walk through this process. The point is that you can save money on making mixtures or blends, it is very important and not too difficult.
Projects, promotions, and the Peter principleSeppo Karrila
This lecture to BS level science students exposes them to how things work in a company, as opposed to in academia. They need to know that projects define their job and tasks, and how they are evaluated or promoted. And I just had to discuss the Peter principle...
This document provides guidance on effectively communicating data and research results. It discusses planning communication by knowing the subject, purpose, audience and setting. It also covers structuring communications through outlining and using a logical flow. Visuals should be used strategically to reinforce key points. Both oral presentations and written reports require clarity, with oral presentations focusing on a few main ideas and using visual aids to support points while engaging the audience.
This stack of slides describes my view on how to work as a PhD student. The presentation was targeted a Ubiquitous Computing audience, but is fairly generic in nature.
1) Writing research papers is an important skill that can improve one's career and impact.
2) It is best to start writing early in the research process to help crystallize ideas and get feedback from others.
3) The introduction should clearly state the problem and contributions while the body provides evidence to support the claims.
This document provides guidance on writing a research paper. It discusses why writing a research paper is important, including disseminating results, exchanging knowledge, career advancement, and personal satisfaction. It outlines the typical steps in the scientific writing process, including completing the research, writing the manuscript, submitting to a journal, and undergoing peer review. Finally, it provides detailed instructions on creating each section of a research paper, such as the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and more. The overall document serves as a guide for new researchers on how to structure, write and publish a scientific research paper.
The correct strategy is to submit your paper to one journal, and wait to hear if it is accepted. If it isn't then submit it to another journal.
Simultaneously submitting the same paper to multiple journals is considered duplicate submission, which is unethical. Withdrawing other submissions once one is accepted still constitutes duplicate submission. The proper process is to submit to only one journal at a time.
ES Series on Scientific Research 34
Source: http://www.elsevier.com/ethics/
This document provides an outline for a presentation on scientific research. It discusses four main types of scientific papers: theoretical papers, experimental papers, fabrication papers, and clinical papers. For each paper type, it describes the key elements and focus. It also discusses literature reviews, including their purpose and common mistakes. Additionally, it covers how to structure a scientific paper, including sections like the abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions. Finally, it provides tips for writing style, including using precise language, correct tenses, active and passive voice, and formatting sentences and paragraphs clearly. The overall document offers guidance on various aspects of writing and presenting scientific work.
The document provides guidance on writing clinical papers. It acknowledges that many papers are written to get published rather than to be read. It outlines common errors in clinical paper writing, including titles that do not match the study, abstracts that exceed word limits or lack important details, introductions that include irrelevant information or omit hypotheses, and methods, results, and discussion sections that do not clearly report on the study design and findings. The document emphasizes writing concisely and focusing on communicating results to readers. It encourages learning from rejections to improve papers for resubmission.
This document provides guidance on writing and reviewing research papers. It begins with acknowledging the recommended reading and then outlines the main goals of a scientific paper. Various document preparation systems are discussed as well as the standard structure for a research paper, including sections on the introduction, background, related work, and conclusion. The document concludes with guidelines on paper style, dos and don'ts, and how to approach reviewing a paper with the goal of improving it for publication.
The document discusses key aspects of conducting research and writing a research report. It addresses the importance of project management and having clear objectives. It also discusses the elements of a research report, including presenting the report as a story or argument. The document notes that a literature review is important to understand what is already known on a topic and to identify research gaps. It advises that a conclusion should discuss the significance of findings and their implications.
This document provides guidance for post-graduate students preparing to defend their thesis or final project. It discusses variations in the defense process between countries and institutions. It also addresses how defenses are evaluated, the range of questions students may face, and tips for ensuring success. Key points include outlining standards for outstanding, acceptable, and unacceptable work. It emphasizes the importance of internal consistency and addressing examiners' questions specifically for one's own university and research.
The document provides guidance on writing an effective thesis proposal. It explains that a proposal seeks to convince reviewers that a research project is feasible by demonstrating that the problem is important, the project is possible within the timeframe, and sufficient data is available. It recommends conceptualizing the proposal as a system with interdependent sections that each contribute something essential. Key sections include the research question, rationale, literature review, theoretical framework, and methodology. The document stresses justifying the importance and approach of the proposed research.
This document provides guidance on technical writing structure and how to avoid plagiarism. It discusses the importance of writing research findings in a way that others will read and understand them. It recommends that papers have a clear title, abstract, introduction stating the contributions, background information, description of the proposed idea, experimental results and discussion, and conclusions. The document advises generating ideas from a research notebook and giving proper credit to related work. It emphasizes conveying intuitions clearly and using examples before details. The goal is to effectively introduce the problem and solution to attract readers and convince them of the importance and insights of the work.
This document provides guidance on publishing research papers. It discusses when researchers should publish, what types of publications they should pursue, and how to select venues. The document emphasizes that writing should start early in the research process and be continually improved. It also offers tips on dealing with rejections, enhancing writing skills, and marketing published work. The overall message is that publishing is essential for researchers, and they must train intensively in effective written communication to disseminate their work and advance their careers.
This document provides information on writing resumes and CVs, including key differences between the two. Resumes are typically one to two pages and focus on employment history, while CVs can be longer and include additional details like education and achievements. The purpose is to get interviews by showcasing relevant qualifications. Effective ones are tailored to specific positions and highlight skills, experiences, and how the applicant meets an employer's needs. Various sections that can be included are described.
This document provides guidance on exploring research questions. It discusses that research questions should define the overall plan and scope of a project. The document outlines a process for moving from a general topic to specific research questions, including brainstorming questions in both structured and unstructured ways. Key steps involve clarifying concepts, stakeholders, goals and metrics; exploring "how" and "why" questions about the topic; and determining if questions are clear, focused, and complex enough to require analysis. Hypothesizing how others may challenge arguments is also recommended. Structured and unstructured brainstorming techniques are presented to generate potential research questions.
The poem describes Ulysses, an aging king who feels restless and desires further adventure and knowledge. He addresses his crew, urging them to set sail once more to explore beyond the known world. Though aged and weaker than in his youth, Ulysses maintains a determined spirit to continue seeking and learning until his death.
How to Choose a PhD Dissertation Topic For Economic Research? List out the Cr...PhD Assistance
This document provides guidance on choosing a dissertation topic for economic research. It outlines 7 criteria or steps to consider when selecting a topic: 1) Choose something you're interested in, 2) Get inspired by previous students' topics, 3) Seek recommendations from professors, 4) Choose something unique but not too complex, 5) Choose a small, specific topic, 6) Consider interdisciplinary topics, 7) Brainstorm ideas and focus the topic by creating a research question. The document emphasizes selecting a topic you're passionate about and one that is narrow enough to be manageable within the dissertation requirements. It also recommends exploring previous works for inspiration and getting feedback from advisors on topic ideas.
This document provides guidance on how to effectively read and analyze academic research papers. It outlines the key components one should consider when reading a paper, including being skeptical of the authors' claims, asking critical questions about the research problem, methodology, results and conclusions. The document also reviews the typical anatomy of an academic paper, covering the introduction, methods, results, discussion and references sections. Lastly, it recommends comparing the paper to similar research and archiving papers for future reference.
Explains two basic types of optimization problems for blends, namely the simpler where total contents have requirements, and the slightly more complicated where final concentrations have requirements. Both are linear programs that can reliably be solved in a spreadsheet, we walk through this process. The point is that you can save money on making mixtures or blends, it is very important and not too difficult.
Projects, promotions, and the Peter principleSeppo Karrila
This lecture to BS level science students exposes them to how things work in a company, as opposed to in academia. They need to know that projects define their job and tasks, and how they are evaluated or promoted. And I just had to discuss the Peter principle...
On practical philosophy of research in science and technologySeppo Karrila
An attempt to indoctrinate graduate students with some philosophy of science and good practices in their research. Some references are included to disturbing trends known from poor practices that appear common to some fields, to make clear the importance of reliable methods, in particular the Scientific Method. Trigger warning: not trying to be nice to everybody.
Ringkasan dokumen:
1. Dokumen ini menganalisis potensi pajak daerah di Kabupaten Minahasa dengan menggunakan rasio antara penerimaan pajak dengan PAD.
2. Hasilnya menunjukkan rasio potensi pajak terus meningkat dari 28,95% pada 2007 menjadi 42,32% pada 2011, yang termasuk kategori berpotensi.
3. Peramalan untuk 2013-2015 menunjukkan peningkatan pajak daerah yang akan menduk
Ringkasan dokumen tersebut adalah:
1. Dokumen tersebut membahas pentingnya berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran siswa menengah atas.
2. Berpikir kritis adalah metode berpikir yang digunakan untuk mengevaluasi dan merevisi pengetahuan sebelumnya untuk memecahkan masalah.
3. Keterlibatan siswa dalam pemecahan masalah kolaboratif dapat melatih keterampilan berpikir kritis mereka
The document is a research paper that investigates the relationship between human resource management (HRM) practices and the performance of foreign-owned subsidiaries in Russia. It presents hypotheses that investments in employee development, feedback systems, and compensation/organizational practices will be positively related to subsidiary performance. It also hypothesizes that aligning HRM practices with business strategy will improve performance. The paper aims to advance understanding of managing human resources in foreign subsidiaries located in different country contexts.
1. Kedua penelitian membahas pengaruh pengembangan karyawan melalui pelatihan terhadap prestasi kerja, tetapi hanya menggunakan metode pelatihan dan tidak menguji pengaruh metode pendidikan atau jenis pelatihan tertentu.
2. Penelitian-penelitian tersebut juga tidak menguji tolok ukur pengembangan karyawan selain prestasi kerja dan memiliki kekurangan dalam validasi instrumen serta landasan teori.
Selecting experimental variables for response surface modelingSeppo Karrila
This document discusses selecting variables and designing experiments for response surface modeling. It recommends beginning with identifying all possible factors, then controlling some and selecting others to experiment with using a design with three levels per variable, like a Box-Behnken design. Response surface modeling fits a quadratic surface to the experimental results rather than optimizing one variable at a time, which can miss the true optimal conditions. The goal is to approximate the maximum or minimum response across variable levels through designed experiments and modeling rather than sequential optimization of individual factors.
How to review a journal paper and prepare oral presentationSeppo Karrila
This document provides guidance on reviewing a journal article and preparing and delivering a scientific presentation. It discusses reviewing an article by answering key questions about the topic, approach, results and implications. When preparing a presentation, the document recommends planning for your audience, structuring your content with an introduction outlining the issue, significance and approach, and creating slides that are simple with short text and large, readable figures and tables. It also provides tips for delivering the presentation, such as practicing your timing, using the microphone, and reminding the audience of key points at the end.
Scale-up and scale-down of chemical processesSeppo Karrila
Explains the path from for example synthesizing a useful appearing material in the lab to actual production of the same. Also explains what pilot machines are, how they are used, and why sometimes down-scaling of a unit operation is done to experiment in bench-scale.
Research seminar lecture_7_criteria_good_researchDaria Bogdanova
This document provides an overview and review of key aspects of educational research. It discusses what educational research is and the main types of research. It outlines the typical steps in conducting research, including identifying a research problem, conducting a literature review, developing research questions and hypotheses, identifying needed data, data collection methods, data analysis, findings, discussion, and conclusions. Good research is defined as having a sound rationale, clear aims, a relevant theoretical basis, well-defined research questions, an appropriate methodology, contributions to the field, and consistency between all steps. Typical mistakes include having too much background and too little on the specific current research, as well as weaknesses in feasibility or scope.
This document provides an overview and outline of a course on research techniques and methodology. It discusses the following key points in 3 sentences:
The course is 32 hours split between lectures and workgroups, with the objectives of training students in research methodology, written and verbal communication skills, and familiarizing them with the computer science research ecosystem. The outline covers topics like types of computer science research, research methodology, communication tools, and sample research areas. The document emphasizes pursuing research problems of importance, where the researcher has unique competence, and developing insights that cut across solutions rather than focusing on single point solutions.
The document provides guidance on writing scientific articles, including their typical structure and key components. It discusses the importance of planning the article by developing a central message and summarizing the key elements. Tips are provided on selecting an appropriate target journal based on factors like the article's significance, relevance and appeal. Common reasons for rejection like lack of novelty or poor writing are also reviewed.
This document discusses research topics, purpose, and products. It defines research and lists its key characteristics. Research is conducted to create new knowledge, solve problems, validate intuitions, and improve methods. The outcomes or products of research can include new theories, models, analyses, and unexpected findings. Choosing a research topic involves considering feasibility and available resources. The purpose should be clearly explained and justified, and the potential products or contributions of the research should be evaluated.
Making your research and teaching more efficient, transparent and impactfulJay Van Bavel
Science is hard and keeping up with the latest changes in technology and research practices can feel overwhelming. This workshop is designed to increase your productivity by making your research and teaching more efficient, transparent, and impactful. This will introduce you to a wide variety of strategies and technologies that you can employ in your work.
This document provides guidance on how to conduct research for a research paper. It discusses selecting a topic and forming research questions. It emphasizes narrowing the topic and choosing a puzzle to solve. It also covers conducting a literature review to understand what is already known about the topic. The document outlines qualitative and quantitative methods for collecting primary and secondary data. It addresses ethical considerations and the role of theory. It provides tips for data analysis and writing the research paper, including avoiding plagiarism. Scholarly journals in various social science fields are also listed.
This document provides an overview of the structure and purpose of journal articles in the sciences. It discusses the different types of information sources and journal article formats, with a focus on empirical journal articles. The key parts of a research article are described, including the introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections. The introduction reviews previous literature and presents hypotheses. The methods section describes operationalized measures and procedures. The results report statistical findings, and the discussion interprets results in relation to hypotheses and literature. The document also provides guidance on effectively reading journal articles by skimming for relevance and deeply reading important sections.
The document provides an overview of researching and defining a research problem. It discusses problem finding versus problem solving, formulating a research problem, sources of research problems, and conducting a literature survey. The key steps in finding a problem are to identify an area of interest, gather information to find gaps, and formulate a hypothesis. A prepared mind is needed to identify potential research problems from observations. The literature survey helps identify gaps and inconsistencies to define a research problem.
This document discusses various aspects of choosing a research topic, including:
- It is important to choose a topic you are interested in that is complex yet compelling. The topic should set the stage for your future research career.
- Generating ideas from course materials, news, the internet, advisors and literature. Attributes of a good topic include being feasible within the given resources and timeframe, and being worthwhile and providing new insights.
- Narrowing a topic by asking questions to refine the focus. Choosing a researchable question that is fact-based, relevant and action-oriented to provide direction for the research process.
This document provides an overview of the typical sections in a research paper or thesis and guidance on how to write each section effectively. It discusses the purpose and content for sections like the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. The document also reviews tips for strong writing like rewriting and getting feedback from others. Overall, it aims to help readers understand what should be included in a research paper and how to structure and tell a compelling story through their writing.
This document provides information about various funding agencies and schemes that can be applied for research funding in management studies. It discusses different funding options from agencies like ICSSR, UGC, DST, AICTE, and others. It also outlines initiatives that can be taken to strengthen research culture and output at the School of Management, such as establishing research centers, offering incentives for publications, collaborating with industry, and developing faculty expertise.
This document summarizes a workshop on converting research papers to manuscripts for publication. The workshop covered why researchers should publish their work, common fears about the publication process, and provided guidelines and exercises to help attendees structure their manuscripts. Attendees were asked to introduce their research and publication goals. The presenter emphasized evaluating literature reviews, methodology rigor, and ensuring work contributes new knowledge to the field. Six macro steps were outlined for manuscript structure: selecting a journal, reviewing results, formulating questions/hypotheses, reviewing literature, aligning all sections, and developing discussion/conclusion. Next steps of copy-editing and proofreading were also noted.
Dr. Anupma Harshal W. is a consultant focused on science communication, public engagement, and skills training. She works on capacity building, mentoring, science writing, and microscopy. The document provides an overview of her background and areas of focus, which include developing learning, literacy, and life skills. It also includes examples of assessment tools and discusses various types of scientific documents like research articles, reviews, and student works.
This document provides guidance on critical reading in the social sciences. It discusses the purposes of different reading materials like textbooks, peer-reviewed papers, and news articles. It also outlines specific purposes for reading in social and political sciences, such as identifying arguments and weighing evidence. The document then covers techniques for reading different types of information like graphs, flow charts, and academic journal articles, advising to start with the abstract, introduction and conclusion, then review the analysis and results, and finish with the methods section.
Delivered at Librarians as Researcher event at York St John University 25th January 2013, hosted by Academic and Research Libraries Group Yorkshire & humberside division.
This document provides guidance on developing a successful research proposal. It discusses the purpose of proposals, when they should be written, and core components to include. Key elements are an indication of why the problem is important, a description of the research question and methodology, and a review of relevant literature. Additional components may include how findings will be disseminated and addressing reliability, validity, ethics and potential problems. The document provides examples and advice for writing strong titles, defining concepts and limits, conducting a literature review, demonstrating significance, and using appropriate methodology. It concludes with sample criteria for evaluating proposals, such as clearly identifying the problem, using a suitable approach, and ensuring feasibility.
This document provides information on developing critical thinking skills when evaluating information sources. It discusses identifying the focus and perspective, finding supporting evidence, and engaging in debate to structure an argument. Potential pitfalls like relying on a single source or copying without attribution are noted. The document recommends evaluating sources like books, journals, and websites by considering author credentials, publication details, biases, and references. It provides tips for critically analyzing research papers and emphasizes the importance of citing sources to avoid plagiarism.
Similar to About your graduate studies part 1 (20)
L9 using datawarrior for scientific data visualizationSeppo Karrila
A tutorial for beginning graduate students on data visualization, by hands-on training in using DataWarrior. These are only handout notes so the students can try things out on their own laptops, with the free software, instead of scribbling notes themselves. The instructor needs to demonstrate the options or functions listed in the handout notes.
Tutorial for beginning graduate students. Basic exploration of multivariate experimental data can be done with freely downloadable software. We also discuss the use of Excel because it is commonly in use.
Tutoring beginning graduate students. This short presentation instructs on keeping at preparation of the thesis while making progress with the experiments.
Tutorial for beginning graduate students. Some guidelines for composing the research proposal for an MS project. Also presents the perspective of advisor and committee.
Tutorial for beginning graduate students. Hypothesis or research question serves as the compass that gives direction to the project. Posing it poorly guarantees poor results, so here is some guidance.
Meetings are often ineffective, wasting participants' time. This document provides guidance for running efficient meetings: have a clear agenda and goals; invite only necessary people; distribute materials in advance; make decisions by assigning responsibilities with deadlines; keep minutes; and plan follow-up. The key is to be focused and action-oriented rather than allowing discussions to wander without purpose.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...Leonel Morgado
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
The technology uses reclaimed CO₂ as the dyeing medium in a closed loop process. When pressurized, CO₂ becomes supercritical (SC-CO₂). In this state CO₂ has a very high solvent power, allowing the dye to dissolve easily.
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...Sérgio Sacani
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
Or: Beyond linear.
Abstract: Equivariant neural networks are neural networks that incorporate symmetries. The nonlinear activation functions in these networks result in interesting nonlinear equivariant maps between simple representations, and motivate the key player of this talk: piecewise linear representation theory.
Disclaimer: No one is perfect, so please mind that there might be mistakes and typos.
dtubbenhauer@gmail.com
Corrected slides: dtubbenhauer.com/talks.html
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptxPRIYANKA PATEL
With increasing population, people need to rely on packaged food stuffs. Packaging of food materials requires the preservation of food. There are various methods for the treatment of food to preserve them and irradiation treatment of food is one of them. It is the most common and the most harmless method for the food preservation as it does not alter the necessary micronutrients of food materials. Although irradiated food doesn’t cause any harm to the human health but still the quality assessment of food is required to provide consumers with necessary information about the food. ESR spectroscopy is the most sophisticated way to investigate the quality of the food and the free radicals induced during the processing of the food. ESR spin trapping technique is useful for the detection of highly unstable radicals in the food. The antioxidant capability of liquid food and beverages in mainly performed by spin trapping technique.
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
ESPP presentation to EU Waste Water Network, 4th June 2024 “EU policies driving nutrient removal and recycling
and the revised UWWTD (Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive)”
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths ForwardLeonel Morgado
We will metaverse into the essence of immersive learning, into its three dimensions and conceptual models. This approach encompasses elements from teaching methodologies to social involvement, through organizational concerns and technologies. Challenging the perception of learning as knowledge transfer, we introduce a 'Uses, Practices & Strategies' model operationalized by the 'Immersive Learning Brain' and ‘Immersion Cube’ frameworks. This approach offers a comprehensive guide through the intricacies of immersive educational experiences and spotlighting research frontiers, along the immersion dimensions of system, narrative, and agency. Our discourse extends to stakeholders beyond the academic sphere, addressing the interests of technologists, instructional designers, and policymakers. We span various contexts, from formal education to organizational transformation to the new horizon of an AI-pervasive society. This keynote aims to unite the iLRN community in a collaborative journey towards a future where immersive learning research and practice coalesce, paving the way for innovative educational research and practice landscapes.
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
About your graduate studies part 1
1. About your graduate studies, Part I:
Why we do research, and is there a
helpful Magic Spell?
PSU Surat Thani
Seppo Karrila, March 2015
2. What do I think you are interested in?
• Part I:
– Why do we study? What is the role of research?
– What is the big picture with graduate degrees?
What do they mean or signify?
– Practical advice to a graduate student? Is there a
Magic Spell to help out?
• Part II:
– What is Science?
– How can we keep making “scientific
contributions”?
4. Half the lies they tell about me
aren't true.
(Yogi Berra.)
• I have ‘always’ been in research, in
– a managed research facility serving an industry
consortium,
– academia with self-managed projects, teaching
– a large international corporation doing proprietary
research
• For more introduction, Google me
5. The future ain't what it used to be.
(Yogi Berra.)
• Technology changes are happening at an
exponential rate (Moore’s Law).
• What will be there in ten more years?
6. Exponential growth of research
(semi-log plot)
• Data from Medline
• Source of plot:
– http://larsjuhljensen.wordpress.com/2008/02/
• Implications:
– Splits to subfields
– Expertise gets old
quickly
– Learner must focus
10. Educators’ dilemma
• If we don’t know what the world is like in
2020, how can we educate students to be
prepared for their duties until retirement
around 2065?
– Honestly, we can’t ! Today’s students must be
able to adapt to things we can’t predict.
12. Critical thinking
• Student detects:
–conflicting information
–selective information and censorship
–disputable assumptions
–confirmation bias
–answering the “wrong” question
–over ambitious claims
13. Simplification
• Removing repetition or redundancy
• Finding common patterns
• Labeling clusters with descriptive
names, creating new terms
• Unifying perspective, new viewpoint
14. Summarization
• Detecting what is essential and what
is “filler”
• Communicating clearly the essentials
• Empathy to audience
–What does the other person know?
–What do I need to tell?
16. The basis for independent life-long
learning
• Critical thinking
• Simplification
• Summarization
• Asking questions, making hypotheses
–Being comfortable with uncertainty
• Strong basis in stable STEM foundations
17. What STEM basis will you need?
• Math: calculus and linear algebra
– If you know these, then thermodynamics, physical
chemistry and statistics are not very difficult
• Statistics
– Design of experiments, regression analysis,
analysis of variance
• Physics, chemistry
18. To keep learning…
• Pose yourself questions that interest you
– Without a question your studies have no direction
– Without direction, there is just too much, and more
every day…
• If you do research, nothing is more important
than a “good question”!
– There is the other type, too. You want to ask
questions that could be answered! For this, you need
to know what has become possible to manipulate and
observe, with the developments in STEM.
19. Why we do research?
• Today’s research may be tomorrow’s
technology
• Teachers who don’t follow research might not
prepare you for your future!
• You do research to
– Demonstrate you know how research is done (MS)
– Demonstrate mastery of techniques (MS)
– Demonstrate mostly independent contribution to
science (PhD)
20. Why does a company do research?
• Research helps fix problems and enables
decisions. R&D = Research and Development.
– Could we use a different type of mixer, separator, heat
exchanger, raw material mix, …
– Can we reduce some quality problem
– Can we increase production rate
– Could we develop a competitive new product
• It is always about product, its quality, and
productivity
– Novelty or publications have very low priority, unless
the novelty is valuable and patentable.
21. PhD: driver’s license to doing science
• Doing a PhD is like a test drive.
– You have support from an advisor. Your scope of
research is pre-defined. You need to come up with
some “new science” and defend your thesis.
• Once you have your PhD
– You are expected to be an independent researcher
who no longer needs an advisor!
– Don’t expect your thesis is your career. When you
have your license, you will not stay on the test track,
you need to learn about other roads and go to places.
22. Industry or academic job?
• Academia produces PhD’s who go to academia
to produce more PhD’s who go to academia…
– It could become a big club, as long as someone
pays for the fun. In the long run this is impossible,
academia feeding its own growth and not feeding
the outside world.
– Go outside to see what is done in the “real world”
with science. Maintain contact with academics,
perhaps come back to tell what you learned.
23. Reality restricts your options
• http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/02/how-many-phds-actually-get-to-become-
college-professors/273434/
24. Discipline…
• Safeguard your data
– Dropbox, Onedrive, Box, …
• Organize your project folder
– References
– Proposal and planning
– Materials and methods
• Raw materials, data sheets, measurement devices, sampling and
sample sources
– Experimental designs
– Experimental data
– Analysis of data
– Reporting
25. Finding literature
• Google search “… AND filetype:pdf”
• Google scholar
– Check for a prominent researcher in your field
• ScienceDirect
• JANE: Journal Author Name Estimator
26. How to read a paper
• Title
• Abstract
• Conclusions
• Figures
• Then read the rest…
• If you have more time and interest, find some
of the references.
27. When you review a journal article…
• You must answer these questions:
– What is this about
– Why is the topic important
– What was done
– Key result (or “what happened?”)
• Implications on practice OR on research activities
– What was left unanswered (according to authors)
• … and this is the real test of your understanding:
– Your critique of the article
28. Here is a Magic Spell
• Issue
• Significance
• Approach
• Results
• Conclusions
29. The Magic Spell applies to many things
• A one-page project proposal
• A full project proposal
• A summary of someone else’s work
• Summarizing your project plan
• Writing a poster
• Giving a presentation
• Writing an article
30. Discussion with the Boss man
• Yes, you wanted to see me. What is this about?
– Issue: what is this about
• Well, I have other more important things…
– Significance: why this is important
• OK, but what can we do about it?
– Approach: actions to take
• So if we do all that, what do we get?
– (expected) results: products of the actions
• And what is the value of the results?
– Conclusions: effects on decisions, practices, …
31. Be prepared to see the Magic Spell
several times today
• Issue
• Significance
• Approach
• Results
• Conclusions