A3a-Team-Report.pdf

11"02, 01/09/2022
A3a - Team Report
Trang 1 trong số 6
https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/104760/assignments/707789
A3a - Team Report
Due Saturday by 19:00 Points 100 Submitting a file upload File Types docx and doc
Start Assignment
Course code and name: BUSM-3311 - 4626 Global Business
Assessment name: Team Project Report
Weight in final grade: 30%
Length: 3000 words +-10% (excluding cover page, executive summary, references)
Due date: At the end of week 10 (19:00; Saturday, September 3 , 2022).
Type: Group of 4 to 6 members
Feedback mode: Written comments and marking rubric in Canvas, face-to-face consultation with your lecturer at request.
Late work: All assignments will be marked as if submitted on time. Late submissions of assignments without special
consideration or extension will be automatically penalised at a rate of 10% of the total marks available per day (or part of a
day) late. For example, if an assignment is worth 20 marks and it is submitted 1 day late, a penalty of 10% or 2 marks will
apply (not the actual mark of your assignment). Let's say the assignment mark is 16/20, and it is submitted 1 day late. The
final mark of the assignment will be 14/20. This will be deducted from the assessed mark. Assignments will not be
accepted if more than five days late unless special consideration or an extension of time has been approved.
Extension approval is possible for up to 7 days late. Request for extension must be submitted before the due date. After
which a Special Consideration is required (unless the student has equitable assessment arrangement): Extensions of
time for submission of assessable work (https://www.rmit.edu.au/students/student-essentials/assessment-and-
exams/assessment/extensions-of-time-for-submission-of-assessable-work) .
Only the course coordinator can approve a request for an extension.
An application for special consideration is made in advance of an assessment wherever possible, but normally within five
working days after the assessment date.
Learning Objectives Assessed
CLO1: Demonstrate research and academic writing skills
CLO2: Critically analyse and synthesise your conceptual knowledge of international business and apply in a real case
study
CLO3: Integrate the key knowledge about international business in a real example so as to contextualise and respond
to comtemporary issues and problems in international business
CLO4: Communicate business data and concepts of international business
CLO5: Formulate and respond to research questions and problems about real-world issues of international business.
CLO6: Reflect on your practices of knowledge and skills acquisition and performance in order to develop your
research, communication, organisational and problem-solving skills
rd

11"02, 01/09/2022
A3a - Team Report
Ready for Life and Work
This assignment prepares you to
Take responsibility for self-management using skills that contribute to personal and career satisfaction and
development.
Use technology in a manner that contributes to the effective management and execution of a range of tasks.
Demonstrate English language proficiency to an appropriate level to perform effectively in the
enterprise/industry/community.
Use communication and team working skills to promote productive and cohesive relations among employees and to
ensure tasks are accomplished effectively.
Assessment Details
In this assessment, the team need to work on a real company from Vietnam that has operated or can expand
internationally in the near future.
The company will be treated as your CLIENT. You will CHOOSE YOUR OWN CLIENT which you think is potential to
penetrate international markets. Please keep in mind that the company must be from Vietnam.
You take the perspective of a consulting team. Your job is to choose a country and write a strategic plan for its future
international expansion into this country. The country must not be the one that the company has already entered. The
mode of entry must not be exporting or importing. The main focus of the expansion is market-seeking motive, but can
include resource-seeking motive as well. You need to write an analysis and give recommendations using IB theories,
concepts, and references.
You should start thinking about the company you want to work on from Week 5. Discuss within your team and check with
your lecturer. Finally, all teams will present in Week 12 in front of your lecturer during your normal class time.
The following items would be helpful as a guideline for your report:
Introduction to the company
Introduction to the country
PESTLE analysis of the country: the complete analysis can be placed as an appendix, and only key and relevant
points should be brought into the report. This will help with the limited word count available.
The quality of references and data sources is important. Please do not use already prepared PESTLEs available from
various websites. Please also ensure that you reference all the sources of information (for example, PESTLE analysis’s
data also need to be referenced).
Internationalization plan:
Reasons for internationalization into this market? Why is this a good market to enter?
What internationalization strategy (Global strategy, International strategy, Transnational strategy or Multi-domestic
strategy) should the company adopt? Why?
What mode of entry (Licensing, Franchising, Joint Venture or Wholly Owned Subsidiary) do you recommend?
Timing of entry? Timeline of the entrance? Why?
Key recommendations for international human resource management aspect of this expansion. Explain your
recommendations.
Any CSR or contemporary issues or unique ideas for the expansion? Why?
Remarks of your strategic plan: summarise the key points of the strategic plan

11"02, 01/09/2022
A3a - Team Report
IB rubric - Assignment 3A – Team Report
Criteria Ratings Pts
Assessment Declaration
Read the Assessment Declaration (https://www.rmit.edu.au/students/student-essentials/assessment-and-
exams/assessment/assessment-declaration) and include the following text on the top second page of your assessment
document (above the main title of your paper):
“I declare that in submitting all work for this assessment I have read, understood and agree to the content and
expectations of RMIT's academic integrity regulations.”
As this is a group assignment, the expectation is that every group member has equally contributed to the final report. If
there were unequal contributions among the group members, grading of this assignment task may differ among the group
members. For further information, you can review the Equity of Contribution Guidelines (https://rmiteduau-
my.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/personal/quyen_dangthao_rmit_edu_vn/EUosKxdr8bVPhg6StPRTbBQB7KOdYSVWTMWGZTVwYzl9AQ?
e=J3b2iV) .
Support Resources
This assessment requires that you meet RMIT's expectations for academic integrity. More information and advice on how
to avoid plagiarism are available in the Getting Started module.
Open the academic integrity page.
Additional library and learning resources are available to help with the assessment in this course
Link to Assignment Support.
Submission Instruction
Use MS Word format file only.
Rename the document file as follow – Team name_A3a.docx
Only one student in each team to submit
Use the A3a cover page with all students' details clearly identified on it.
Use font size 12 only for body text
Make 1.5 line space between lines
Make clear and separate paragraphs
Keep margins 2 cm (0.8 inch) wide
Download the document - GB - A3a - Cover Page.docx
(h!ps:/
/rmit.instructure.com/courses/104760/files/25056851/download?download_frd=1)
Marking Rubric
Please see marking rubric below

11"02, 01/09/2022
A3a - Team Report
10 pts
30 pts
Organisation
and Structure
10%
10 to >7.9 pts
HD
Essay structure used.
Introduction states the
main argument and
provides an overview
of the essay including
the conclusion. The
information in the
body is relevant and
logically considers
different perspectives
with effective
transitions. The
conclusion
synthesises the
to draw a final
conclusive statement.
The essay is within
the 3000-word limit
(+/- 10%).
7.9 to >6.9 pts
DI
Essay structure is
used. Introduction
states the main
argument and provides
an overview of the
essay including the
conclusion. The
information in the body
is mostly relevant and
logically considers
with effective
transitions. The
conclusion synthesises
the different
perspectives to draw a
final conclusive
statement. The essay
is within the 3000-word
limit (+/- 10%).
6.9 to >5.9 pts
CR
Essay structure is
generally used.
Introduction
states the main
argument and
provides an
overview of the
paper. The body
is generally on
topic. A
conclusion is
included.
Organisation
supports
argument and
purpose;
sequence of
ideas could be
improved. The
essay is within
the 3000-word
limit (+/- 10%).
5.9 to >4.9 pts
PA
Essay structure
is used.
Introduction
states the main
topic. A
conclusion is
included. Some
signs of logical
organisation.
May have
abrupt or
illogical shifts
and ineffective
flow of ideas.
The essay is
within the
3000-word limit
(+/- 10%).
4.9 to >0 pts
NN
Poorly
organised
OR
demonstrates
serious
problems
with
progression
of ideas.
There is no
clear
introduction,
structure, or
conclusion.
Report
structure may
have been
used. The
essay is
within the
3000-word
limit (+/-
10%).
Understanding
and Content
30%
30 to >23.9 pts
HD
Excellent
understanding and
engagement with
course materials.
Use of course
content is accurate,
focused, and
consistent; exhibits
control in
development of
ideas; unified with a
fresh insight.
Excellent selection
and use of an
extensive range of
primary and
secondary sources,
including academic
journal articles and
credible facts. Use
more than 20 high
quality, relevant
journal articles in
the essay.
23.9 to >20.9 pts
DI
Mostly sound
understanding and
engagement with
course materials.
Use of course
content is accurate,
focused, and
consistent; exhibits
control in
development of
ideas; unified with a
fresh insight.
Excellent selection
and use of an
extensive range of
primary and
secondary sources,
including academic
journal articles and
credible facts. Use
more than 15 high
quality, relevant
journal articles in the
essay.
20.9 to >17.9 pts
CR
Good general
understanding
and engagement
with course
materials. Use of
course content is
mostly accurate
and fairly clear;
demonstrates
solid but less
accurate
reasoning;
contains some
appropriate
details and/or live
cases. Good use
of primary and
secondary
sources and
meets minimum
10 academic
journal articles.
17.9 to >14.9 pts
PA
Poor
understanding
and engagement
with course
materials. Use of
course content is
somewhat vague
OR only loosely
related to the
writing task; at
times may be off
topic OR too
broad with limited
support. Poor use
of primary and
secondary
sources or live
cases. Meets
minimum 10
relevant
academic journal
articles however
their quality is
questionable.
14.9 to >0 pts
NN
Unsatisfactory
understanding
and
engagement
with course
materials.
Content
unclear; lapses
in coherence
OR has no
relation to
writing task;
offers
simplistic,
undeveloped
support for
ideas. Poor
use of primary
and secondary
sources,
including
academic
journal articles
and credible

11"02, 01/09/2022
A3a - Team Report
40 pts
10 pts
facts. Do not
meet minimum
10 relevant
academic
journal articles.
Argument and
Critique
40%
40 to >31.9 pts
HD
There are clear, well-
focused and
developed
arguments. Main
ideas are clearly
developed with well-
supported, detailed
and accurate
information. Skilfully
evaluates
information
gathered, questions
taken-for-granted
assumptions,
demonstrates
relationships
amongst ideas,
considers various
(stakeholder)
perspectives.
Arguments are
supported by
excellent selection
and use of an
extensive range of
primary and
secondary sources,
including academic
references and
credible facts.
31.9 to >27.9 pts
DI
There are clear,
well-focused
arguments. Main
ideas are mostly
clear and developed
with the support of
detailed information.
Adequately
evaluates
information
gathered, questions
taken-for-granted
assumptions,
demonstrates
relationships
amongst ideas,
considers various
(stakeholder)
perspectives.
Arguments are
supported by good
selection and use of
an extensive range
of primary and
secondary sources,
including academic
references and
credible facts.
27.9 to >23.9 pts
CR
There are
generally well-
focused
arguments. Main
ideas are
somewhat clear
and developed
with the support
of detailed
information.
Generally
demonstrates
reasonable
relationships
among ideas,
demonstrates
some counter
factual thinking.
Arguments are
supported by
reasonable
selection and use
of an adequate
range of primary
and secondary
sources, including
academic
references and
credible facts.
23.9 to >19.9 pts
PA
There are some
arguments. Main
ideas are
somewhat clear
but are not well
developed or
supported. Some
connections
between main
ideas, limited
clarity and
complexity of
thought, possibly
assumes
conclusions, lack
of counter factual
thinking.
Arguments are
supported by
acceptable
selection and use
of a limited range
of primary and
secondary
sources, including
academic
references and
credible facts.
19.9 to >0 pts
NN
The topic,
main
argument and
ideas are not
clear.
Insufficient
reasoning and
simplistic
analysis of
complex
issues,
possibly
assumes
conclusions,
lack of
counterfactual
thinking.
Arguments are
supported by
poor selection
and use of
primary and
secondary
sources,
including
academic
references
and credible
facts.
Academic
Written
English
10%
10 to >7.9 pts
HD
All sentences are
well constructed
and have varied
structure and
length.
Paragraphs are
well structured
with topic,
supporting and
concluding
7.9 to >6.9 pts
DI
Sentences are
mostly well
constructed and
have varied
structure and
length.
Paragraphs are
well structured
with topic,
supporting and
6.9 to >5.9 pts
CR
Sentences are
generally well
constructed and
have varied
structure and
length. Paragraphs
are generally well
structured. The
author makes up to
3 errors in
5.9 to >4.9 pts
PA
Sentences are
generally well
constructed but
have a similar
structure and/or
length.
Paragraphs are
generally well
structured. The
author makes 4-5
4.9 to >0 pts
NN
Sentences sound
awkward, are
distractingly
repetitive, or are
difficult to
understand.
Paragraphs are
poorly structured
and hence are
often too short or

11"02, 01/09/2022
A3a - Team Report
Total Points: 100
10 pts
sentences. The
author makes no
errors in
grammar,
mechanics,
and/or spelling.
concluding
sentences. The
author makes no
errors in
grammar,
mechanics,
and/or spelling.
grammar, syntax,
mechanics, and/or
spelling, but they
do not interfere with
understanding.
errors in grammar,
syntax,
mechanics, and/or
spelling that
interfere with
understanding.
too long.
Numerous errors
in grammar, and/or
spelling that
interfere with
understanding.
Referencing
and Citation
Format
10%
10 to >7.9 pts
HD
Formatting is neat,
professional and
strictly respects
the assessment
formatting
guidelines
indicated on the
cover page.
Referenced
according to an
official academic
referencing style’s
conventions
(Harvard, APA
.etc): (i.e.) In-text
citations are
placed in
parentheses after
the sentence or
part thereof that
they support; page
numbers are only
provided for direct
quotes; long
quotes (30 words)
are presented as a
separate indented
paragraph.
Reference list is
complete, properly
formatted and
presented
alphabetically with
a hanging indent.
7.9 to >6.9 pts
DI
Formatting is neat,
professional and
mostly respects the
assessment
formatting
guidelines indicated
on the complete
cover page. Mostly
referenced
according to an
official academic
conventions
(Harvard, APA
.etc): (i.e.) In-text
citations are placed
in parentheses
after the sentence
or part thereof that
they support; page
numbers are only
provided for direct
quotes; long quotes
(30 words) are
presented as a
separate indented
paragraph.
Reference list is
complete, properly
formatted and
presented
alphabetically with
a hanging indent.
6.9 to >5.9 pts
CR
Formatting looks
neat, but violates
a few of the
assignment
formatting
guidelines.
Generally
referenced
according to an
official academic
conventions
(Harvard, APA
.etc): (i.e.) several
mistakes with in-
text citations
indicating
confusion
regarding
providing of page
numbers, citing of
secondary
sources, when to
use (and or and)
etc. Reference list
is complete,
properly formatted
and presented
alphabetically with
a hanging indent
but may have
typographical
inconsistencies.
5.9 to >4.9 pts
PA
Formatting looks fairly
neat, but violates
many assignment
formatting guidelines.
Mostly referenced
according to an
official academic
conventions (Harvard,
APA .etc): (i.e.) many
mistakes with in-text
citations. Reference
list may be
incomplete/improperly
formatted. Possibly
some references
missing from list.
4.9 to >0 pts
NN
Formatting
looks untidy
and does not
follow
formatting
guidelines.
Poorly
referenced
according to
an official
academic
referencing
style’s
conventions
(Harvard,
APA .etc),
possibly
footnotes are
used instead.

A3a-Team-Report.pdf

More Related Content

Similar to A3a-Team-Report.pdf

More from Ngoc Tuyen

Recently uploaded

A3a-Team-Report.pdf