The document analyzes classroom discourse in four College English classes in China. It finds that teacher talk dominates class time, averaging 68.9% of class periods. The dominant discourse structure is Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF), accounting for 77.7% of exchanges. Teachers primarily use display questions that test recall of known information, rather than referential questions that elicit new student responses. The study aims to understand features of classroom discourse and offer suggestions for teachers to encourage more student talk.
For those ELT teachers who are carrying out reading classes at the level of primary school or teaching ELLs, I highly recommend you to peruse and take a look at this approach because it focuses on the teaching of language arts, which is the teaching reading and writing.
Language Assessment - Standards-Based Assessment by EFL LearnersEFL Learning
Â
ELD (English Language Development) Standard involves dozens of curiculum and assessment specialist, teachers, and researchers.Number of domains; Categories of language, Studentâs need , Number and scope of standards, Set of standards for teachers, Means available.
For those ELT teachers who are carrying out reading classes at the level of primary school or teaching ELLs, I highly recommend you to peruse and take a look at this approach because it focuses on the teaching of language arts, which is the teaching reading and writing.
Language Assessment - Standards-Based Assessment by EFL LearnersEFL Learning
Â
ELD (English Language Development) Standard involves dozens of curiculum and assessment specialist, teachers, and researchers.Number of domains; Categories of language, Studentâs need , Number and scope of standards, Set of standards for teachers, Means available.
Materials development stands as a crucial domain within ELT (English Language Teaching). For individuals aspiring to enhance and advance their English skills, the utilization of appropriate materials becomes imperative. Enclosed is a PowerPoint (PPT) file, the culmination of my comprehensive research on this subject, offering a historical overview of Materials development to aid your learning journey.
Hi! I am sharing my presentation about English for science and technology. and i gives so many example and symbols though out English language for science and technical student ....
Materials development stands as a crucial domain within ELT (English Language Teaching). For individuals aspiring to enhance and advance their English skills, the utilization of appropriate materials becomes imperative. Enclosed is a PowerPoint (PPT) file, the culmination of my comprehensive research on this subject, offering a historical overview of Materials development to aid your learning journey.
Hi! I am sharing my presentation about English for science and technology. and i gives so many example and symbols though out English language for science and technical student ....
A Comparative Study of American English File and New Headway English CourseAJHSSR Journal
Â
ABSTRACT: Textbooks play an essential role in the language learning process. The difficulty is that among a wide range of textbooks in the market,there are a lot ofoptions which make the process of book selection even harder. Therefore, book evaluation is a vital process, and it has great impact on the process of learning and teaching. In order to evaluate ELT textbooks, theorists and writers have offered different kinds of evaluative frameworks based on a number of principles and criteria. To this end, two EFL textbooks namely New Headway English Courseand American English File which are commonly taught in language institutes in Iranwere selected for evaluation by seeking the teachersâ viewpoints on the effectiveness of the two textbooks. Twenty ELT teachers helped the researcher rate the evaluative checklists. A modified version of [1] teacher textbook evaluation form was used to collect data.The results indicated that the differences between the two textbooks were not significant in four features including practical considerations, layout and design, activities, and skills, but they proved to be different in some other features including language type as well as subject and content.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Analyzing patterns of classroom interaction in Iranpavlop
Â
Summary of paper:
Analyzing Patterns of Classroom Interaction in EFL Classrooms in Iran by
asser Rashidi
Shiraz University, Iran
Mahshid Rafieerad
Shiraz University, Iran
Exploring ESL Teacher Beliefs and Classroom Practices of CLT: A Case StudyMohammad Mosiur Rahman
Â
This paper presents a case study that investigated and compared the stated beliefs
and observed classroom practices relating to Communicative Language Teaching
(CLT) of two ESL teachers. The findings of the study revealed that both the
teachers hold similar complex beliefs that mostly contradict the philosophy of
CLT. The practices were not in line with their stated belief or CLT principles
either. The findings also indicate that teachers indeed possess a set of complex
beliefs that are not always realized in their classroom practices for a variety of
potential reasons: some of these might be directly related to the context of
teaching. Additionally, this study found that by articulating and reflecting on his
beliefs, the teacher became more aware of the meaning and impact of these beliefs on his classroom practices. Some implications of future studies have also discussed.
Employing Social Media in Text-Based InstructionAJHSSR Journal
Â
ABSTRACT:Text-Based Instruction was first introduced over two decades ago but still has relevance for
language teaching today. However, the texts typically used in this approach are of a literary or academic nature
rather than texts that are motivating and more immediately relevant to learnersâ lives. This paper proposes the
use of social media platforms, in particular Instagram, as a way to make the utilization of Text-Based Instruction
more meaningful to students.
KEYWORDS âgenre theory, whole texts, Text-Based Instruction, English language learning, contemporary
texts
An Evaluation of the New Interchange SeriesAJHSSR Journal
Â
ABSTRACT: In language teaching and learning, textbooks can play a very important role. As Riazi (2002)
stated,textbooks are the second effective factor in every classroom after the teacher. Therefore, choosing an
appropriate textbook for a class has been one of the most essential tasks for teachers and curriculum planners.
Thus, it is clear that evaluating a textbook is of great importance in order to achieve the desired objectives.In
this paper, Littlejohnâs framework (1998) is employed in this attempt with the aim of evaluating the New
Interchange Serieswritten by Richards, Hull and Proctor (2006). This framework evaluates theselected textbook
regardless of how it is used in the classroom. In sum, the analysis indicated that the New Interchange
Seriesdonâtemploy learners or the teachers as a source for its content; rather, they pay attention mainly on pair
works and meaning. They also encourage students to use the language, andmore importantly they usually
require them to talk and discuss rather than to be a listener.However, there were some parts, including
retrieving, repetition and written extended discourse, that need to be taken into better consideration.
Similar to A case study on college english classroom discourse (20)
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
Â
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
Â
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasnât one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
Â
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as âdistorted thinkingâ.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
Â
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
Â
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Â
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
Â
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Â
A case study on college english classroom discourse
1. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
1
ISSN 1839-9053
A Case Study on College English
Classroom Discourse
Jingxia Liu 1
, Thao Le 2
1
Three Gorges University, China
2
University of Tasmania, Australia
ABSTRACT
Classroom discourse analysis is an aspect of classroom process research. It helps us understand how
teachers use a language in classroom. Based on the data of discourse collected from English classroom
in Three Gorges University in China, this paper attempts to reveal the features of discourse in College
English classroom. The paper describes and analyzes the data from the aspects of the amount of teacher
talk, the structures of classroom discourse and the questions of teacher. It finds out some features in
the present College English classrooms, they are: teacher talk far exceeds students talk; IRF pattern
dominates classroom discourse structure, and larger amount of displayed questions On the basis of
data analysis, the author offers some tentative suggestions for English teachers to courage students to
talk more in class.
Keywords: Classroom Discourse analysis, Teacher talk, Classroom discourse structure, Teachersâ
questions
INTRODUCTION
Classroom discourse, which includes the interactions between language learners and their teacher or
other learners, has been one of the most discussed topics in both classroom research and L2 acquisition.
It illustrates the joint contributions of teacher and students, rather than focusing only on the teacherâs
language. It is very important not only for teachersâ classroom organization but also for studentsâ
language learning. Classroom discourse analysis is an aspect of classroom process research. According to
Arthur (2008), the earliest systemic study of classroom discourse was reported in 1910 and
stenographers were used to make a continuous record of teacher and student talking in high school
classrooms. The first use of audiotape recorders in classrooms was reported in the 1930s, and during the
1960s, there was a rapid growth in the number of studies based on analysis of transcripts of classroom
discourse. These early studies showed that the verbal interaction between teachers and students had an
underlying structure that was much the same in all classrooms, at all grade levels, and in all countries. In
China, due to the lack of English-speaking environment outside classroom, classroom discourse is
regarded as a kind of model language and the main source of âinputâ for almost all the non-English
major students in college. Studentsâ successful learning outcomes, to some extent, result from the
appropriate discourse in classroom instruction.
The present research is a case study and it inherits the previous researchersâ rationale and methodology
to describe and analyze classroom discourse based on the data collecting from College English
classrooms in China Three Gorges University. The research tries to find out the features of College
2. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
2
ISSN 1839-9053
English classroom discourse from the three aspects: the amount of teacher talk, the structure of
classroom discourse, and the questions of teacher; the paper intends to offer some suggestions for
managing classroom discourse.
BACKGROUND
Previous Studies
Since the 1960s and early 1970s, many studies on classroom discourse have been undertaken in the
English-speaking countries. A great number of them have drawn much attention to interaction between
teachers and students. Among those who early began to conceive classroom talk in terms of structure
were Bellack and his colleagues (1966). They offered a simple description of classroom discourse
involving a four-part framework: 1) structure, 2) solicit, 3) respond, and 4) react (cited in Allwright and
Bailey, 1991, 98).
Barnes (1978) sought to record and discuss the pattern of teacher interaction and the patterns as well
that could be applied in small group talk among students. His commentaries on the patterns of talk
revealed ways in which teachers talk appeared to impact on studentsâ learning, sometimes facilitating it,
sometimes stifling it, while his other work most notably on students learning in small groups, also
uncovered a great deal of ways students could usefully learn together as they collectively build some
understanding in talk.
The concept of classroom discourse has undergone various interpretations. Edmondson (1985) believed
that the classroom discourse provides âco-existing discourse wordsâ depending on whether the
participants are engaged in the act of trying to learn or trying to communicate. Nunan (1993) viewed
classroom discourse as the distinctive type of discourse that occurs in classroom. In his opinion, special
features of discourse include unequal relationships, which are marked by unequal opportunities for
teachers and pupils to nominate topics, take turn at speaking, etc.
Kramsch (1985) considered classroom discourse as composed of a continuum extending from pedagogic
to natural discourse poles. The interaction between group members in a classroom moves between the
two poles of this continuum consisting of instructional roles. Xu Erqing and Ying Huilan (2002) analyzed
the discourse pattern and communicative features in an English classroom teaching with New College
English as textbook. Liu Jiarong and Jiang Yuhong (2004) investigated and described the discourse in oral
English lessons. All the above studies definitely have significant influence on research of classroom
discourse and language teaching.
Aspects of Classroom Discourse Analysis
Amount of Teacher Talk
The amount of teacher talk influences the classroom teaching. Many researchers have already done
research on it. It is argued that the amount and quality of teacher talk is a decisive factor for classroom
teacher and has great impact on L2 learning (Hakansson, 1986). Nunan (1991) claimed that the amount
of teacher talk should be appropriate, so that students could get a chance to produce output. Harmer
(1998) also found out that teacher talk occupied much more time than students talk. The balance of
teacher talk and student talk is important in the EFL classroom, so that students can get more
3. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
3
ISSN 1839-9053
opportunities to internalize English knowledge and improve their language competence in the way of
learning English by using English.
IRF Structure
Sinclair and Coulthard (1975) developed a model of classroom discourse involving a series of ranks and
levels arranged in hierarchical order. They found in the traditional native-speaker language school
classroom, a structure of three-part exchanges: Initiation, Response, and Feedback, known as IRF.
Teachers and pupils speak according to the very fixed perceptions of their roles and the talk could be
seen to conform to highly structured sequences. According to them, the following is the typical
classroom discourse sequences:
T: Whatâs the capital of Trance? (Initiation)
S: Paris. (Response)
T: Yes, Paris. Thatâs right. (Feedback)
These three moves, the teacherâs initiation, the studentâs response and the teacherâs feedback, consist
of an exchange. Sinclair and Coulthard put forward that in teacher-student interactions, the response
part of the exchange was typically followed by a third move on the teacherâs part. This move consists of
an evaluative commentary on the studentsâ response, which they termed as feedback. This feedback
move is a function of the teacherâs power to control language and meaning since it signals what is to be
viewed as relevant knowledge within the discourse. The I-R-F sequence has been widely accepted by the
researchers as a useful category to analyze classroom discourse.
Teachersâ Questions
Teachers use questions to manage classroom interaction. In some classrooms, over half of the class time
is taken up by question-and-answer exchanges. Teachersâ questions have been the focus of research
attention for many years. Substantial research exists demonstrating that questions can assist learners in
improving their linguistic ability. According to Ellis (1994), teachers control the classroom discourse and
occupy the first part of ubiquitous three-phase IRF exchange by asking many questions. Questions
typically serve as devices for initiating discourse centered on medium-orientated goals, although they
can also serve a variety of other functions.
Many researchers make questions in different taxonomies. Barnes (1978) developed the earliest
taxonomy, which distinguished four types of questions in classroom. The first type is Factual Questions
(what), the second type is Reasoning Questions (how and why), the third type is Opening Questions that
do not require any reasoning, and the fourth type is Social Questions that influence studentsâ behavior
by means of control or appeal. Kearsley (1976) offered an extensive taxonomy of question types based
on conversational data. Long and Sato (1983) developed taxonomy of functions of teachersâ questions
which was adopted from Kearsleyâs taxonomy. According to the taxonomy, questions can be divided
into two main types of questions: echoic questions and epistemic questions. Echoic questions are used
to check whether students have understood information, while epistemic questions are used to
stimulate to acquire information.
Although there are much different taxonomy to describe different types of questions, many classroom
studies of teacher questions adopt the classification of display questions and referential questions.
4. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
4
ISSN 1839-9053
Ellis (1994) classified the types of questions from a new angle and discuss display questions and
referential questions. Display questions ask the respondents to provide or display knowledge or
information already known by the questioner, e.g. âWhatâs the oppostie of âupâ in English?â (Ellis, 1994,
p. 587). Referential questions request information not known by the questioner. To some extent,
âreferential questions are genuinely information-seeking, while display questions âtestâ the learners by
eliciting already known information.â (Ellis, 1994, p. 587). Referential questions are more likely to elicit
longer, more authentic responses than display questions, e.g. âWhy didnât you do your homework?â
(Ellis, 1994, p. 587). Referential questions are to encourage diverse responses from students which are
not short answers, and to engage them in higher-level thinking to provide their own information and
ideas than to recollect the previously presented information.
The present study will follow the classification of display questions and referential questions. Teachersâ
questions in teacher-student interaction constitute an important part of classroom discourse, and the
proper use of questions is beneficial to studentsâ English learning.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This part is concerned with the research methods to explore classroom discourse. In what follows, the
author will state the research questions of the present study, and then present the participants and
introduce the instruments adopted in the research. Finally, the author will describe and analyze the data
in order to draw the conclusions to the study.
Research Questions
This research focuses on the following questions:
1. What is the amount of teacher talk in 45 minutes (one period of class) of College English classrooms in
Three Gorges University (CTGU)?
2. What types of discourse structures can be found in College English classrooms at CTGU?
3. How frequently are display questions and referential questions used by teachers in College English
classroom at CTGU?
Participants
The author randomly chose four teachers lecturing on College English for non-English majors at CTGU
and their students as the participants. There were four classes, with 50 students in each class. The
teachers and students shared the same L1 background, that is, they are all Chinese. The four teachers
had similar education and teaching background with master degree and more than 5 yearsâ English
teaching experience, and had sufficient preparation for their work.
The participating students were 100 freshmen and 100 sophomores from different majors, such as
Application Technology of Computer, Chemical Engineering, Mathematics, Tourism Management,
Journalism, etc. All of them have received at least 6 yearsâ English education. In other words, they had
possessed the integrated competence to use the English language.
5. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
5
ISSN 1839-9053
Instruments
Audio-recording and classroom observation were the major instruments for the present study. MP3
recorder was used to collect discourse data from the four College English classrooms. The English classes
of the four classrooms were audio-recorded and then transcribed for analysis. Besides, in order to make
up the potential limitations lying wherein, the author attended the four classes, observing the classroom
teaching and learning processes. The author didnât intervene the natural classroom teaching and
learning process and the verbal behavior of both teachers and students, and she just observed the
classroom activities and took field notes to facilitate data transcription and analysis.
Data Collection
The data were collected over a span of roughly two months from March to May in 2011. Each class was
audio-recorded and observed three times. The textbook for the students is New Horizon College English.
The teachers were informed of the authorâs research, but not of the purpose of the research. The
lessons were not specially prepared for the research and all the lessons were recorded under a natural
classroom environment. Through the time of two months, enough data were obtained based on
classroom observation and audio-recording of classroom discourse.
Research Procedure
After the investigation, all the discourses of the teachers and their students were transcribed and
calculated from the three aspects: the amount of teacher talk, the types of discourse structure, the uses
of teachersâ questions. The process of data collecting, transcribing and calculating is exhausting, as it
needs patience and great care. All the items (of three times of audio-recording of each class) concerning
the above three aspects were counted to get the means and average percentages of the items for each
class. The means and average percentages of the items of the four classes were finally calculated and
analyzed.
RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
RESEARCH RESULTS
RESULT OF THE AMOUNT OF TEACHER TALK
Table 1 is the amount of teacher talk in College English classrooms of the four classes, showing teacher
talk time, student talk time and other activities time (such as listening to audio materials, watching
movies, etc., where neither teachers nor students need to talk) in 45 minutes (one period of class), and
their percentages in the total class time.
6. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
6
ISSN 1839-9053
Table 1. Amount of Teacher Talk
Classes
Teacher
Talk Time
(min)
Proportion
(%)
Student
Talk Time
(min)
Proportion
(%)
Other
Activities
Time
(min)
Proportion
Class 1 31 68.89 11 24.44 3 6.67
Class 2 30 66.67 8 17.78 7 15.55
Class 3 28 62.23 15 33.33 2 4.44
Class 4 35 77.78 5 11.11 5 11.11
Means 31 68.89 9.75 21.66 4.25 9.44
Table 1 shows that the amount of teacher talk time greatly surpasses that of student talk time. In these
four classes, the mean of teacher talk time in 45 minutes (one period of time) is 31 minutes while
student talk time is only 9.75 minutes. The percentage of teacher talk time is larger than that of student
talk time. Teacher talk still dominates College English classroom.
Result of Types of Classroom Discourse Structure
By means of Sinclair and Coulthardâs model (IRF), the result of discourse structure analysis is presented
in Table 2.
Table 2. Types of Classroom Discourse Structure
Classes
IRF Structure Other Structures
Number Percentage
(%)
Number Percentage
(%)
Class 1 15 71.43 6 28.57
Class 2 18 78.26 5 21.74
Class 3 20 80 5 20
Class 4 17 80.95 4 19.05
Means 17.5 77.66 5 22.34
In Sinclair and Coulthardâs model (IRF), the teacher exerts the maximum amount of control over
classroom discourse. Table 2 shows some features consistent with Sinclair and Coulthardâs findings on
language classroom discourse structure. IRF structure is observed to take a large proportion (77.66%).
The following is a typical example of IRF structure found in one of the four classrooms.
T: What does âbreak downâ mean here? (Initiation)
S: âDestroyâ. (Response)
7. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
7
ISSN 1839-9053
T: Yes. It means âdestroyâ or âdamageâ. Thank you. (Feedback)
In this exchange, the teacher initiated a question, the student responded to it, and the teacher provided
a feedback with confirmation.
Table 2 reflects that IRF structure is dominant in College English classrooms at CTGU. In IRF structure, the
teacher has two turns, while the student has only one. It demonstrates that the opportunities for
students to practice English are unsatisfactorily insufficient.
Result of the Uses of Teachersâ Questions
The frequencies of the two types of teachersâ questions (display question and referential question) are
listed in Table 3.
Table 3. Frequency of Display Questions and Referential Questions
Classes
Frequency of Display Questions Frequency of Referential
Questions
Number Percentage
(%)
Number Percentage
(%)
Class 1 9 42.85 12 57.15
Class 2 16 69.56 7 30.44
Class 3 11 57.89 8 42.11
Class 4 6 37.5 10 62.5
Means 10.5 51.95 9.25 48.05
The data in Table 3 indicate that the uses of display questions and referential questions are different in
the four classes. There is a predominance of referential questions over display questions in Class 1 and
Class 4, while in Class 2 and Class 3, display questions are more frequently used than referential
questions. The teachers gave display questions like âLinda, would you look at Paragraph 3? Can you tell
me when they went to the party?â, âWho are older and more experienced, the writer or his friends?â
and referential questions such as âWhat are the advantages and disadvantage of living in cities?â, âHow
do you look at making a bad decision?â On average, there is a priority of display questions (51.95%) over
referential questions (48.05%), though the discrepancy is not big.
FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS
According to Table 1, the average amount of teacher talk time is 31 minutes in 45 minutes (one period
of time), which greatly surpasses that of student talk time (9.75 minutes). The reasons for such a
situation are likely as follows:
1.Traditionally, teachers in China are supposed to play a dominant role in language classrooms. Quite
some teachers are still holding that they know more about what they are teaching, and they are the
absolute authority in classroom instruction. They talk much in class to explain language points or
translate the whole text exhaustively. Students are always in a passive position in the teacher-oriented
classrooms.
8. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
8
ISSN 1839-9053
2. Teachers are monopolizing the ultimate responsibility to manage classroom interaction and to ensure
the teaching process could proceed in an orderly way to the desired goal.
3. Studentâs language level, especially their oral English proficiency, limits their contribution to
classroom discourse. To the authorâs observation in the four classes, the students are not used to
speaking English in class due to the fact that they barely spoke English in the previous English classes.
Even when the teachers give them chances to speak English, they may not make good use of the
chances to improve their oral English.
Nunan (1991) once pointed that excessive teacher talk should be avoided to give students more
opportunities to produce comprehensible output themselves. In fact, no one can give an exact answer
to what amount of teacher talk during one period is proper for classroom interaction. However, there is
one thing for sure that if teacher talk dominates the class, students will not be encouraged to contribute
more to classroom interaction and to ensure the accurate use of English.
The data in Table 2 confirm the result in Table 1, that is, teachers talk much more than students in
English class. The rigid IRF structure accounts for the predominant proportion of teacher talk in College
English classrooms. An IRF structure consists of two teacherâs turns and one studentâs turn, so itâs no
wonder that the teacherâs turn is double the studentâs turn in one IRF exchange. The students have few
chances to practice unless the teacher initiates a question which requires them to answer. They usually
generate nothing but a few words or just read the original sentence (s) in the text as a reply, which
contributes little to improving their linguistic and communicative competence. The frequent use of IRF
structure constrains students to enjoy longer speaking turns and to practice English.
From Table 3, we can find that the number of display questions used in the four classes is a little larger
than that of referential questions. However, there is nearly a balance of uses between the two types of
questions. Two teachers prefer to use display questions. They intend to help the students confirm their
knowledge perhaps due to the studentsâ low level and lacking of autonomous learning awareness.
However, the other two teachers ask more referential questions, which concern interaction between
teachers and students.
Through classroom observation, it is found that the purpose for teachers to ask display questions is
usually to check students about the learnt knowledge. While teachers ask referential questions to let
students practice more English and have more chances to participate in classroom interaction. When
students are given more referential questions, they can be encouraged to provide obviously longer,
syntactically more complex answers, and get more opportunities to give their own ideas.
CONCLUSION
Summary of the Findings
The present study describes and analyzes the features of College English classroom discourse of CTGU.
The findings are as follows: Firstly, as to the amount of teacher talk, the study finds that teacher talk far
exceeds student talk. Teacher talk still dominates College English classrooms at CTGU. Secondly, with
regards to the types of discourse structures, IRF is frequently used. Under the rigid IRF pattern, there
exist an unequal relationship and teacher talk predominance. Unequal power relationships are
measured by unequal power opportunities for teachers and students to nominate topics and take turns
speaking. Thirdly, in terms of teachersâ questions, the teachers use more display questions than
9. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
9
ISSN 1839-9053
referential questions. This is also another reason for the imbalance between teacher talk and student
talk.
The findings show that the College English classrooms in CTGU are still teacher-oriented. In the
classroom, the teacher is the most active person. It is the teacher who controls the subject matter,
deciding whatever needed to be talked and orchestrating what the students should do, which, obviously,
contradicts the current teaching concept of students-centeredness. On the whole, the findings of this
study provide an empirical evidence for realizing the three aspects of English classroom discourse at
CTGU. The findings also offer some suggestions to English teachers to improve classroom interaction by
using appropriate discourse in their teaching.
Pedagogical Implications
Classroom discourse is important for the organization and management of the classroom. Based on the
results and analysis of the data, some feasible suggestions for teachers in managing classroom
communication are illustrated below:
Balancing teacher talk time and student talk time
The appropriate use of teacher talk greatly influences classroom interaction. On one hand, teacher talk
should be adequate in order to provide students with enough comprehensible input of English. On the
other hand, students should be encouraged to practice speaking English as much as possible. Therefore,
teachers are desired to regulate their talks to moderate their control of the whole class, and provide
students with more opportunities to increase their target language output to improve their target
language proficiency.
Encouraging using different forms of classroom discourse
Teachers generally decide the patterns of classroom discourse, many of which are based on IRF
sequence and characterized by display questions. One way to increase studentsâ learning motivation in
the classrooms is to allow the use of different discourse patterns. For example, students prefer
cooperative learning, which is especially beneficial to establishing a supportive classroom atmosphere
and promotes studentsâ language skills. Compared with IRF structure, in cooperative learning, students
have more opportunities to talk and share ideas with their group members. They usually tend to be
more confident to speak if they have done some discussion with their peers.
In the classroom, sometimes it is appropriate to employ IRF structure, e.g. when the answers for some
questions are already known or the teacher wants to give an evaluation. At other times, it is advisable to
be more genuine and natural in communication, such as getting students to exchange ideas or
information among them.
Asking more referential questions
Referential questions are thought more likely to elicit longer and more authentic responses than display
questions; subsequently an increased use of referential questions by teachers may create discourse
which can produce a flow of information from the students to the teacher, and may create a more
quasi-normal speech. However, display questions require short or even one-word answers, which quite
10. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research Issue 2 2012
10
ISSN 1839-9053
improbably move students to produce large amounts of speech. Therefore, teachers should
intentionally resort more to referential questions to encourage students to talk more.
The implications are drawn from four classrooms of College English at CTGU only, which, therefore,
might be biased, but representative as they certainly are. The findings reflect the features of College
English classroom discourse at CTGU. The present study has shed light on the three aspects of classroom
discourse of College English, which are the amount of teacher talk, the types of classroom discourse and
teachersâ questions. And the pedagogical suggestions given by this study are hoped to be enlightening to
English teachers.
REFERENCES
Arthur, D. (2008). Discourse (Online). Retrieved 20 April 2012 from http://www.Answer.com
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom
research for language teachers . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes, D. (1978). The study of classroom communication in teacher education. InM. Gill, &W.J. Crokers,
(eds.). English in teacher education. Armidale, NSW: University of New England.
Bellack, A. A. et al. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Edmondson, W. (1985). Discourse worlds in the classroom and in foreign language learning. Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, 7, 5-9..
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harmer, J. (1998). The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman.
Hakansson, G. (1986). Quantitative studies of teacher talk. Kasper (ed.). Learning, teaching and
communication in the foreign language classroom. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Kearsley, G. (1976). Questions and question-asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 355-375.
Kramsch, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. New York: Longman.
Liu, J., & Jiang, Y.. (2004) . The investigation on the discourse of oral English classroom. Foreign
Languages and Foreign Languagesâ Teaching, 4, 285-289 .
Long, M. H. & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachersâ
questions. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. London: Penguin English.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Xu E., & Ying, H. (2002). The study on classroom conversation. Foreign Languages and Foreign Languagesâ
Teaching, 3, 24-27.