2. Introduction
Contrastive Analysis Declaratives: +/-
Simple sentences Questions: Wh Q
Yes/no Tag Q
Compound sentences Coordinate Sen.
Subordinate Sen. Conditional Sen
Predictions dependent clause
Experiment
Discussion
Conclusion
3. Theoretical stand point
First objective
Predict the problems of Iranian speakers in
producing the correct patterns of English
intonation
Simple
Three levels of structure Compound
Complex
4. Second objective
Evaluate CAH by means of a simple
experiment
CAH:
The degrees of similarity and difference
correspond respectively to the degrees
of simplicity and difficulty.
8. Questions
Yes/no Q
intonation
English 23 Glides to a slightly higher position
Persian Rising intonation
No change in word order except for ?aya
A change in the word order of the statement
9. Questions
lg Intonation Rising Falling
English Asking for
information
Get the
conformation
Persian Seeking information Confirmation
Question-tags
10. Tag questions: mæge næ, næ, or ?intor nist
at
the end of the sentence
11. English
Rising intonation: The speaker is asking for
information
(2 3 2I2)
4
3
2
1
You can do it, can’t you?
Falling intonation: The speaker is a little more
sure that s/he is trying to get the confirmation
she expects
/2 3 1I3 1/
12. Compound sentences
2 sent. have falling tone if conj væ is fully pronounced
In Persian
The pre-conj remains level, but the post-conj Sen is
falling
13. Compound sentences
Each Sen has only one primary stress
In English
/232I231/ Slight pause at the end of the first Sen but the pitch
goes on with the beginning of the second sentence
15. Last syllable of the if-clause
receives primary accent followed
by a low rise
If is omitted in if-clause the
intonation pattern doesn’t change
If the order of clauses change, the
intonation pattern will slightly change
16. 1. if clause: /2 3 2/ pattern
In English subordinate clause: /2 3 1/ pattern
2.if clause: /2 3 2/ pattern with a low rise
subordinate clause: /2 3 1/ pattern
17. Note:
If the order of clauses
changes, the /2 3 2I2 3 1/
pattern will be used
24. Question-tags
No difficulty in intonation but substituting the information-
seeking intonation with asking for confirmation
is rendered as
25. Different types of clauses
Difference: stress patterns of the 2 lgs causes
the learners to raise their voice on the Persian-
based accented words
is rendered as
26. Experiment
The idea of interference was of preliminary significance
to the present study
Experiment
Subjects 10 university students majoring in fields other than English
Data Statements and questions among all the Sen types discussed
Administration -Select Sen of other types to divert their attention
-Read Sen once
-Record their voice
-four judges
-format with 3 column: words, tones, attitudes
Data analysis -Columns analyzed separately
-divide responses: S=similar to normal Eng
D=different from normal Eng.
followed Persian stress= inter
Locate stress on other words= others
27. Discussion
Affirmative Sentences:
1. 95% of SS, read with falling intonation
2. 29% followed the Persian Sen stress rule in
specifying the prominent words
In Persian stress occurs mostly on the final words or phrases
28. 20% stressed the words of the Sen in other
places according to their perception
Intralingual error, a complexity
within the TL
29. Negative sentences
93% correct in falling intonation
62.25% stressed the wrong words
50.75% located the strongest stress in negative
markers
30. Wh-question
Contrary with predictions:
15% followed Persian stress sys (Not interference)
Correct prediction:
84% of SS read Sen with a falling tone
Information-seeking type
31. Yes/no Q
Confirmed predictions
87% used rising intonation at the end of the Q
60.25% located the correct Sen stress.
39.75% Placed strongest stress on other words
Confusing phenomenon
Are you watching, boys?
Boy is an addressee in the former
Boy is an obj in the latter
32. Word ordering
English: often fixed
Wh-words
Persian: Flexibility is relatively greater
English: always fixed
Negative markers
Persian: more flexible
33. Conclusion
Stress has sig influence on intonation
To make the analysis reliable we have to take
the entire sentence structure into account not
just the end of it.
Lg intonation Falling in Rising in
English/ Persian statements, Wh-
questions
Yes/no questions
and some types
of tag questions
Similarities btw English and Persian
34. Conclusion
Because Terms similarity and difference defined
broadly, result of many studies may not be valid
so we have to define them narrowly to have an
accurate result.
Six level generalizations to specify the relative
degrees of similarity and difference between the
intonation patterns of 2 lgs
35. Level 1
The final syllable of the last word in L1 &
L2 is stressed by similar pitch change
36. Level 2
The final syllable of the word in the 2 lgs is
stressed regardless of its location in the Sen.
37. Level 3
The final two-syllable word of the 2 Sen. is
stressed but:
The primary stress occurs on the
first syllable in L2
The primary stress occurs on
the second syllable in L2
39. Level 5
The negative markers are stressed in L1
but unstressed or less stressed in L2
The pitch changes toward
the end of the sentence
The pitch changes
on negative markers
40. Level 6
Wh-words are stressed in L1 but
unstressed or less stressed in L2
Their position is fixed in L2
Any content word
towards the end of
the sentence
41. Stressed in L1 regardless of their place of
occurrence in the Sen.