 Females use significantly more learning strategies than males
 Females found to use strategies more frequently even across cultural
backgrounds
 Females used Social & Metacognitive Strategies most, while males used
Metacognitive & Compensation most
 In contrast, some studies found males use learning strategies more
than females
 Where males were more likely to use a variety of learning strategies
than females
 Although no significant gender differences, males used significantly
more Social Strategies than females
 Still there are other studies that found no gender differences for LLS
use
 No significant effect on certain strategies like Memory, Metacognitive &
Affective, unless from different majors
 No statistically significant differences according to gender with strategy
use
 High level of proficiency associated with increased use of
both direct and indirect strategies
 A linear correlation and significant correlations between
strategy use and proficiency level were found among
Korean EFL learners & university students in Hong Kong
respectively
 Both Cognitive & Metacognitive strategies show high
correlations with high language proficiency levels
 Proficiency level strongest predictor of LLS used by
Iranian learners
 Proficient students used more overall strategies , but
significantly more cognitive, metacognitive, and affective
strategies than less proficient ones
 An individual’s learning style preferences influence the
type of LLS they use
 Extroverts show a strong preferences for Social
Strategies while introverts use Metacognitive
Strategies more frequently
 Learners who make study group tend to use more
Social & Interactive strategies
 There were qualitatively significant differences
between Iranian EFL learner perceptual learning style
preferences & LLS
 Studying abroad contributed to LLS choices
 Purdie & Oliver’s (1999) study showed that students
who had been in Australia for a longer period time
obtained significantly higher mean scores for
Cognitive Strategies & for Memory Strategies
 But, frequency of LLS used decreased across
increasing time length of studying the language
 An important factor influencing strategy use
 Positive correlation between motivation level and use of
LLS
 More motivated learners used more LLS and more
frequently
 Number of learning strategies associated with motivation
level
 Based on Japanese students in England, instrumental and
integrative motivation had significant effect on choice of
LLS
 MacLeod (2002), strategy use was affected by
motivational level instead of a particular motivational
orientation
 The most significant factor that affecting choice of LLS
 Attapol Khamkhien. 2010. Factors Affecting Language Learning Strategy Reported Usage
By Thai And Vietnamese EFL Learners. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching
2010.Vol.7.No.1.pp. 66–85 © Centre for Language Studies National University of
Singapore.
 Mohammad Rahimi, Abdolmehdi Riazi, Shahrzad Saif. 2013. An Investigation into the
Factors Affecting the Use of Language Learning Strategies by Persian EFL Learners.
 Simin Zeynali. 2012. Exploring the Gender Effect on EFL Learners’ Learning Strategies.
ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Vol. 2.No. 8. pp. 1614-1620.
August 2012 © 2012 ACADEMY PUBLISHER.Manufactured in Finland.
 Wu Lin Fang. 2013. A Study of Factors Affecting College Students’ Use of ESL Vocabulary
Learning Strategies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 19;
November 2013. Fooyin University Language Education Center Taiwan.
TASK 6 STRATEGI

TASK 6 STRATEGI

  • 2.
     Females usesignificantly more learning strategies than males  Females found to use strategies more frequently even across cultural backgrounds  Females used Social & Metacognitive Strategies most, while males used Metacognitive & Compensation most  In contrast, some studies found males use learning strategies more than females  Where males were more likely to use a variety of learning strategies than females  Although no significant gender differences, males used significantly more Social Strategies than females  Still there are other studies that found no gender differences for LLS use  No significant effect on certain strategies like Memory, Metacognitive & Affective, unless from different majors  No statistically significant differences according to gender with strategy use
  • 3.
     High levelof proficiency associated with increased use of both direct and indirect strategies  A linear correlation and significant correlations between strategy use and proficiency level were found among Korean EFL learners & university students in Hong Kong respectively  Both Cognitive & Metacognitive strategies show high correlations with high language proficiency levels  Proficiency level strongest predictor of LLS used by Iranian learners  Proficient students used more overall strategies , but significantly more cognitive, metacognitive, and affective strategies than less proficient ones
  • 4.
     An individual’slearning style preferences influence the type of LLS they use  Extroverts show a strong preferences for Social Strategies while introverts use Metacognitive Strategies more frequently  Learners who make study group tend to use more Social & Interactive strategies  There were qualitatively significant differences between Iranian EFL learner perceptual learning style preferences & LLS
  • 5.
     Studying abroadcontributed to LLS choices  Purdie & Oliver’s (1999) study showed that students who had been in Australia for a longer period time obtained significantly higher mean scores for Cognitive Strategies & for Memory Strategies  But, frequency of LLS used decreased across increasing time length of studying the language
  • 6.
     An importantfactor influencing strategy use  Positive correlation between motivation level and use of LLS  More motivated learners used more LLS and more frequently  Number of learning strategies associated with motivation level  Based on Japanese students in England, instrumental and integrative motivation had significant effect on choice of LLS  MacLeod (2002), strategy use was affected by motivational level instead of a particular motivational orientation  The most significant factor that affecting choice of LLS
  • 7.
     Attapol Khamkhien.2010. Factors Affecting Language Learning Strategy Reported Usage By Thai And Vietnamese EFL Learners. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 2010.Vol.7.No.1.pp. 66–85 © Centre for Language Studies National University of Singapore.  Mohammad Rahimi, Abdolmehdi Riazi, Shahrzad Saif. 2013. An Investigation into the Factors Affecting the Use of Language Learning Strategies by Persian EFL Learners.  Simin Zeynali. 2012. Exploring the Gender Effect on EFL Learners’ Learning Strategies. ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Vol. 2.No. 8. pp. 1614-1620. August 2012 © 2012 ACADEMY PUBLISHER.Manufactured in Finland.  Wu Lin Fang. 2013. A Study of Factors Affecting College Students’ Use of ESL Vocabulary Learning Strategies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 19; November 2013. Fooyin University Language Education Center Taiwan.