1. Data Reporting Decisions
A presentation prepared by the
Multilateral Fund Secretariat

2. Data Reporting
ExCom urged UNEP to continue to include an item
in the agenda of each CAP network meeting
addressing reporting requirements, as provided in
decision 55/11(b) (decision 58/14)
Country programme data
Qualitative performance assessment of implementing
agencies
2

3. Country programme data reporting - I
ExCom requested UNEP to allocate time in network
meetings for training on the CP web-based system and
provide feedback on the experience gained (decision
52/5(b))
Pursuant to decision 59/4 ExCom reviewed the
usefulness of the country programme data web system at
the 63rd Meeting
The Executive Committee considered whether to make the
submission of country programme data through the web-based
portal mandatory but before making such a decision requested the
Secretariat, in consultation with the implementing agencies, to
identify the reasons for which so few countries had used the web-
based portal (decision 63/4)
UNEP was requested to hold a session on the revised
format for country programme data reporting at its
network meetings (decision 60/4(b)(i))
3

4. Country programme data reporting - II
Article 5 countries should have submitted 2010 country
programme data by 1 May 2011
The country programme data reporting format was
revised (decisions 54/4(f) and 60/4(b)) to accommodate:
HCFC control measures
Regulations and legislation for HCFCs
Coverage of all HCFCs
Prices of HFC alternatives and any other new alternative
At the 63rd Meeting the Secretariat modified the CP data
reporting format for which would be effective for the
submission of 2012 CP data due on 1 May 2013
(decision 63/4)
excludes CFCs, CTC and halons
includes relevant methyl bromide, TCA and HCFC
4

5. Country Programme - web-based reporting
Country programme data entry at http://intranet.unmfs.org/cp
Please contact the Fund Secretariat (secretariat@unmfs.org) for
assistance relating to data submission, the web-based system or
the subsequent data analysis in the status of compliance
document
User names and passwords are available from the Regional
Network team
5

6. Data Entry issues with web-based system-
ADMIN A. DATASHEET
Both right and left sides of the sheet should be
completed
Total of use by sector should equal imports +
production – exports unless there is stockpiling
Use the comments column to indicate the level of
stockpiling
HCFCs
Use the drop down box (see next slide) to add further types
of HCFCs to the “Substances” column
Specify the chemical e.g. HCFC 124, HCFC 225 since
different HCFCs have different ODP values
6

7. 7

8. Data Entry problems with Admin B
Many countries use the previous version of the
Excel format instead of the new Excel format or
online version and thus use an older version of the
Admin B sheet
Often countries do not answer all questions
Date format
month - day - year
8

9. 9

10. Data entry problems: Admin C.
Import and export data should be in metric tonnes
(not in ODP tonnes)
Make sure to enter in US dollars per kilogramme
For the number of training programmes (see slide
“Admin C - continued”:
A comment should be added indicating if the number is
cumulative or annual (annual data is preferred)
If the only data you have is for a year or a number of years,
then provide a breakdown by year
10

11. 11

12. 12

13. Data Entry Problems—Admin D. and
Admin E.
Complete the entire section
Enter “not available” if no data
For Admin E, specify the IA so that the form
will be submitted automatically to IA
13

14. 14

15. CP web-based reporting – feedback
Your feedback and suggestions would be
appreciated
Have you attempted to submit your country
programme data with the web system?
If you tried to use the web system and did not
complete the task of submitting the CP data, please
explain the reasons?
15

16. Qualitative performance indicators - I
At its 55th Meeting, Excom requested UNEP’s
Compliance Assistance Programme (CAP), through
its regional networks, to include an item in the
agenda of each of its network meetings addressing
reporting requirements of the Executive Committee,
including the qualitative performance questionnaire,
so as to ensure a better response to the survey in
future (decision 55/11(b))
At its 61st Meeting, Excom requested UNEP to
remind countries, at meetings of regional networks,
to complete the surveys on the performance of
bilateral and implementing agencies (decision
61/17)
16

17. Qualitative performance indicators - II
In accordance with decision 46/14 national ozone
officers receive a questionnaire regarding the
assessment of each implementing agency vis-à-vis
the agency’s annual business plan
Confidential questionnaire covers 3 main qualitative
performance indicators with four point scale for
ranking implementing agency performance
(1) organization and cooperation
(2) technical assistance/training
(3) impact
17

18. Qualitative performance indicators – III
NOUs have to specify a rating of 1 to 4
4 (highly satisfactory)
3 (satisfactory)
2 (less satisfactory)
1 (unsatisfactory)
NOU should also indicate on the questionnaire if a question is not
relevant to the agency concerned. Comments can also be added
The assessment report is confidential, but will be shared with the
implementing agency concerned for its comment
Next questionnaire was sent on 4 May 2011
18

20. 20

21. 21

22. 22