The document proposes a new theory called Astrotheology, Cusack's Universe. It uses examples of magnets and beams with fixed end supports under load to model fundamental forces. The author argues that previous theories from 1905 do not adequately explain how the universe works, and that mass is formed when energy is stored at a critical point, represented by pi on the graph. The theory suggests the universe is stable, not expanding, and there could be experimental evidence from the Western Pacific Biotwang.

1. *Corresponding Author: Paul T E Cusack, Email: St-michael@hotmail.com
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Available Online at www.ajms.in
Asian Journal of Mathematical Sciences 2017; 1(5):201-204
The Magnet & the Stable Universe
*Paul T E Cusack
*BScE, DULE, 1641 Sandy Point Rd., Saint John, NB, E2K 5E8 Canada
Received on: 19/07/2017, Revised on: 16/08/2017, Accepted on: 15/09/2017
ABSTRACT
Theories on the universe, established in 1905, don’t adequately explain how the universe really works.
Those errors how propagated for over 100 years because there were thought to be untouchable. We
provide here a brief explanation of how it really works, named Astro-Theology, Cusack’s universe. Its
proof lies in the mass of the proton- the stored energy of the Superforce. The Superforce was discovered
and published in previous papers by the same author. It is hoped that this new theory is well tested, not in
the media, but rather in experimental observation, as all science should be. A n understanding of the
universe must be beautiful and true. That is enough to make a life worthwhile. This is the holy grail of
humanity.
INTRODUCTION
The author’s theory on Astrotheology, Cusack’s Universe can be summarized by this simple paper. First
we consider an ordinary magnet and the resistance it provides when two similar poles are pushed
together. That force pushing them together is the Superforce. The resistance obeys Hooke’s Law with a
“Cusack’s-Young’s modulus” of Pi-e=0.4233=k. This system can be thought of as an equilibrium
condition as with a simple mass on a spring. Next, we consider the beam with fixed end supports. As the
load, q, is applied, at a certain point rupture occurs and a plastic hinge is formed. /that energy is store in
the plastic hinge as mass of the proton. The classic natural logarithm and exponential decay graph shows
that the Wan de Waal forces (strong nuclear and weak nuclear) are modeled by ln. When Pi is reached at
time ton the x-axis, the rate of change of mass (dM/dt =2). This is the critical point where energy is
stored in mass and the resistance to mass formation is overcome. Finally, the golden mean parabola
shows that mass is formed at the roots (t=-0.618 and stops at t=1.618). The bounded energy is E=y=-e^1.
We begin this simple explanation of our physical universe with the bar magnets.
Figure 1 Mass-Spring in equilibrium
Ma=-ks
m d²x/dt²=-kx
Since M=k
Then d²x/dt²=x
y=y“

2. Paul T E Cusack et al. The Magnet& The Stable Universe
© 2017, AJMS. All Rights Reserved. 202
Force acting on magnetic bar:
2F=2R=2(dx/dt)
sin t=dx/dt
∫sin t=∫dx/dt
-cos t=x
Energy
E=W ×t=Fd t
=(-kx)(x)t
=-kx² (1)
=-(0.4233)(-cos 60°)(1)
=0.1058
1-0.1058=944.5
Figure 2 (a)Stress -Strain and Cusack’s Modulus; mass on a spring = stable equilibrium
Refer to figure 3.
q=sin (1)/2=0.4207
1/0.4207=2.377=Ln 3.16~Ln π
q=∫sin (1/0 /2
=2.701~et
Ln t=Rm=e-t-Ln t
2 Ln t=e-t=q=2.702=et
2 Ln t=2.701
2Ln t=et
& cos 1=et
2Ln t=cos 1
Ln (cos 1)=t
t=-0.618
0.618+1.618=2.236=dt
dt=sec =1/cos t=c
t=c=2.996
∫dt=∫sec t
AJMS,
Sep-Oct,
2017,
Vol.
1,
Issue
5

3. Paul T E Cusack et al. The Magnet& The Stable Universe
© 2017, AJMS. All Rights Reserved. 203
=t=Ln |sec t +tan t|
223.6=1/cost +tan t
2119+212=Ln π Refer to figure 4.
Figure 3 Plastic hinge
Figure 4 Energy-time graph
Figure 5 Golden Mean Parabola e-π
-Ln π=1.999~2=dM/dt
={0.432+114.47]/2
=0.4286/2
=0.214
=π-1
=∑ t
∑t+t
=2.14+ ∫sec t
∫sec t=Ln |sec t +tan t|+ℂ
=223.6=Ln | 1/ cos t +tan t| +ℂ
e-2.236=1/cos t +tan t
935.58=1/cos +sin t/cos t
935.6=[1+sin t]/cos t
935.6=3.97+ ℂ
=1/T+ℂ
AJMS,
Sep-Oct,
2017,
Vol.
1,
Issue
5

4. Paul T E Cusack et al. The Magnet& The Stable Universe
© 2017, AJMS. All Rights Reserved. 204
=t+ℂ
935.6/[3.97+ℂ]=235.6+ℂ=1/0.4243+ℂ=1/k
935.6+2,.14=937./7~938=M p+
E=Wt=Fdt=-(0.4233)(cos 1)(1)=0.1236~1/0.809=1/M
E=1/M=1/t
t=M
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to take this opportunity in this, perhaps my final paper, to acknowledge all those who came
before me to build an understanding of the world as we now know it. From teachers, to engineers,
mathematicians, and scientists who all worked to build a better world. There are too many to name;
indeed, there a countless millions of people who are working hard and diligently who are unsung heroes.
I’m the lucky fellow at the top who benefitted from all this work. Humanity is the beneficiary. Know that
you too helped to build a better working model of the universe which is the purpose of humanity.
CONCLUSION
So we see that the model I propose for our universe is not like previous theories such a s Relativity and
the Big Bang Theory. I call this new theory Astrotheology. I believe that it was well know to ancient
civilizations such as the Egyptians, Babylonians, and the Hebrews. The universe is, I think, stable and not
expanding. There is space outside of space. Your universal perspective doesn’t change depending upon
your speed. There could be experimental evidence for this theory in the so-called Western pacific
Biotwang. That remains to be seen. Although the author has made every effort to make sure the work is
correct, there remains lots of work to be done in Theoretical and Experimental Physics.
REFERENCES
1. Cusack, P., Astrto-Theology, Cusack’s Universe. J. of Physical Mathematics. Jan 2016.
2. Western Pacific Biotwang- Experimental Evidence Astrotheology Cusack’s Universe. J. of
Astrophysics and Aerospace Technology. OMICS., 2017
3. Laursen, H. I., Structural analysis. McGraw-Hill., 1969.
AJMS,
Sep-Oct,
2017,
Vol.
1,
Issue
5