SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
The Anthropic principle, Cosmological
number coincidences & the Fermi Paradox…
Jim Kelly FRAS ©jfK April 2015
The Allen Telescope Array Berkeley California
The Drake Equation N = R* fp ne fl fi fc L
http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/369/1936.toc?etoc
Phil Trans Royal Soc 2011 Vol 13 p 499-699
Audio 2010 The detection of extra-terrestrial life - Discussion Meetings - The Royal Society.mht
Why are the values of certain numbers linked to Life…?
Numbers in the Cosmos
• The Hubble constant: Age, size & mass of the Observable Universe
(Big Bang Cosmology)
• The fine structure constant α ~ 1 /137 (electromagnetic coupling)
(The Constants of Nature: π = 3.14159... φ = 1.161803... e = 2.71828)
• The Anthropic principle and Large numbers 1040
, 1080
, 10120
(Dimensionless ratios of Atomic & Cosmological Quantities )
• Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and the 7.65MeV Carbon resonance
(The work of Fred Hoyle explained as Anthropic reasoning)
• The Drake equation & the search for extraterrestrial intelligence
(Overcoming the hurdles to communicating with the Cosmos)
• The Fermi paradox and Life in the Galaxy...
(The eerie silence.... ET phone Home ! Where is everybody ? )
Nuclear masses & Energy
equivalents
Statistical Thermodynamics,
Quantum Mechanics & Atomic
Physics
Gravitation, Electromagnetism
Name symbol value
Tera T x 1012
Trillion
Giga G x 109
Billion
Mega M x 106
Million
kilo k x 103
milli m x 10-3
micro µ x 10-6
nano n x 10-9
pico p x 10-12
SI Units
Mass
(Kg)
Length
(m)
Time
(s)
The 4 Pillars of Big Bang Cosmology
Our current understanding of the Universe
1. Hubble expansion: distance-redshift relation
Age of Universe (1929)
2. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB)
Temperature (COBE) ~ 2.7K (1989)
3. Interstellar H / He Abundance
Stellar Nucleosynthesis B2
F H (1957)
4. Distribution & evolution of Galaxies (Timeline)
Lambda (Λ) Cold Dark Matter Model (WMAP)
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 2001
Doppler Effect
Pillars of Creation….
Evidence for the Big Bang
• Expanding universe – Hubble’s Law (H = v / d)
Edwin Hubble 1929 spectroscopically measured the redshifts of distant galaxies with the 100” Hooker telescope at the
Mount Wilson Observatory, the rest as they say is history…
• Cosmic Microwave Background – CMB radiation
Penzias & Wilson received the 1978 Physics Nobel Prize for their discovery of the relic radiation left over from the
Big Bang – microwaves at a temperature of ~ 2.7K
2006 Nobel Prize Smoot & Mather–Blackbody/Anisotropy of the CMB-seeds of large scale structure
• Elemental abundances 4
He/H, Deuterium, 3
He, 7
Li
Burbidge, Burbidge, Fowler & Hoyle (the Classic 1957 B2
FH paper) predicted the “Synthesis of elements in the
stars”. Primordial ratios predicted by Alpher, Gamow 1948 (Famous α β γ paper)
• Olbers’ paradox – Why is the night sky so dark ?
Problem – If the Universe is infinite, eternal & filled with stars we ought to see a bright night sky
Solution – One of the 3 assumptions must be wrong: Starlight hasn’t had the time to brighten the whole sky. Edgar
Allan Poe first recognised this. By looking at the night sky is the simplest & clearest evidence that the Universe
had a beginning….
Eagle Nebula M61Eagle Nebula M61
• The Hubble Deep Field
• ~ 10 days Dec 1995
The age (s), size (m) and mass (kg) of the
Observable Universe
Expansion of the Universe
Radiation era dominated by
Dark ages
1010-43-43
ss
QuantumQuantum
Gravity eraGravity era
Cosmic microwave backgroundCosmic microwave background
Surface of last scatterSurface of last scatter
LightLight
13.7 billion13.7 billion
yearsyears
Gravitational wavesGravitational waves
NowNow
The Big Picture….The Big Picture….
SpaceSpace
TimeTime
PlanckPlanck
scalescale
GrandGrand
UnificationUnification
EpochEpoch
ElectroweaElectrowea
kk
1010-10-10
ssLeptonLepton
EpochEpoch
1010 22
ss
1010 1313
ss
Photon EpochPhoton Epoch
1 Billion years1 Billion years
Confinement of quarksConfinement of quarks
p,np,n
Nucleosynthesis of HeNucleosynthesis of He
Decoupling of Matter-RadiationDecoupling of Matter-Radiation
AtomsAtoms
Galaxy Star formationGalaxy Star formation
MatterMatter
DominatedDominated
Era > 10Era > 10 22
ss
RadiationRadiation
DominatedDominated
Era < 10Era < 10 22
ss
The Universe becomes transparentThe Universe becomes transparent
1010-35-35
s Cosmic Inflations Cosmic Inflation
380,000 years380,000 years
≡≡ 1010 1313
ss
M104 Sombrero Galaxy ~29M Lyr Messier 49 ~55M Lyr M31 Andromeda Galaxy ~2M Lyr
Hubble constant Ho = ? (km/s) / Mparsec [ slope of Graph ]
1 parsec ~ 3.26 light years = 3.08568025 × 1016
metres Ho ~ ( ? ) s-1
Cosmological distance ladder I (Earth-Moon-Sun)
1.
2.3.
1. Earth’s circumference – Eratosthenes noticed that a well in Syene (modern day Aswan on the Tropic of Cancer),
Egypt was light directly from above (12pm) on the Summer solstice while a stick at Alexandria cast a shadow of 7.2°
due to the Earth’s curvature. Knowing the distance between these two places (~ 500 stadia, Olympia) enabled an
estimate of the Earth’s circumference. Taking a stadia as 185m can you calculate the Earth’s Circumference ? s = r
.Ɵ
Knowing a circular distance of 500x185 m corresponds to 7.2° it is easy to find the distance that corresponds to 360°.
2. Relative diameter Earth / Moon – During a lunar eclipse the time it takes for the shadow of the earth to cover the
moon is ~ 50 mins, about ¼ of the time it takes for the moon to re-emerge into light again ~ 200 mins. Therefore the
Earth is ~ 4 x larger than the moon.
3. Lunar distance – Using similar triangles an extended thumb of known distance subtends the same angle as the
larger lunar triangle (when obscured) where the lunar size in 2. can be used to estimate the distance Earth - Moon.
s
r
Cosmological distance ladder II Greeks
Anaxagoras of Anatolia (c500-428 BC) – explained eclipes (moonshine merely reflected sunshine).
Aristarchus of Samos (c310-230 BC) – measured the angle between the moon when directly
overhead and the sun (hence perpendicular) in order to determine the earth-moon/earth-sun ratio.
Eratosthenes (c276-193 BC) measured the Earth’s circumference (see Fig 1.)
4. Figures due to Aristarhcus. See modern distances right,
Moon–Earth-Sun angle θ ~ 89.85°
5.
4. Solar distance – knowing the Earth-Moon distance (Fig 3) and measuring the angle between the
moon and sun it is a matter of trigonometry to calculate the distance to the Sun.
5. Solar size – Knowing that during a Solar Eclipse the Moon exactly covers the face of the sun it is
possible to determine the Solar diameter by knowing the size of the moon. Check yourself above.
Typical modern day values
Earth’s circumference = 40,100 km
Earth’s diameter = 12,750 km
Moon’s diameter = 3480 km
Sun’s diameter = 1,390,000 km
Earth – Moon distance = 384,000 km
Earth – Sun distance = 150,000,000 km
1 parsec (parallax of 1 arc second) coined 1913
00
00' 01’’ (1/60 x 60 degrees)
Herbert Hall Turner
Uncertainty in measurement %e ~ (δx / x) .
100%
Measuring the Hubble constant Ho
• Ho = 71.0 +/-1.4 (km/s) / Mparsec
(WMAP 7 year result 2010)
• Ho = 72 +/-8 (km/s) / Mparsec (HST
2001 Cepheid variable star
measurements)
• Ho = 72.6 +/-3.1 (km/s) / Mparsec
(HST 2010 Gravitational lensing
measurements)
• Ho = 73.8 +/-2.4 (km/s) / Mparsec
(HST 2011 infrared camera redshift
of various astronomical objects)
• Ho = 74.2 +/-3.6 (km/s) / Mparsec
(HST 2009)
• Ho = 77.0 +/-15% (km/s) / Mparsec
(2006 Chandra X-ray Observatory)
Andromeda Galaxy
2 Million light years
Hubble Calculator
INPUT
Ho = 71 km s^-1/Mparsec
Ho = 2.30E-18 s^-1
1 / Ho = 4.35E+17 s
Age 1.38E+10 yr
Universe 13.78117 Gyr
Action of the Observable Universe = mass x size2
/ time (Js)
Action of Quantum (Planck’s constant) h = 6.6 x 10 -34
Js
Action of the Universe / Action of Quantum =
A Dimensionless Number ~ 8.51 x 10 86
/ 6.626 x 10 -34
~ 1 x 10 120
Age (Time since Big Bang) (Back of an envelope
calculation !)
Units of Ho = s -1
So therefore 1/ Ho = s
T = 1 / Ho = 1 / 2.30095 × 10-18
s
T = 4.34603 x10 17
s ~ 13.781 Gyr
Size (of the observable universe – distance light has travelled since
the Big Bang)
R ~ c / Ho (not including redshift)
R ~ 3 × 108
/ 2.30095 × 10-18
R ~ 1.30 × 10 26
m
Mass (Not including Dark Matter or Dark Energy)
Estimate based on Critical density ρc = 3 Ho
2
/ 8 π G = 9.9 x 10-27
kg
m-3
ρc = M / V = M / R3
So M = ρc x R3
M = 9.9 x 10-27
x (1.25 × 10 26
) 3
M ~ 2.2 x 10 52
kg
Action
Action = Js = Nms = kg m s-2
m s = mass x size2
/ time = M x R2
/
T
52 26 2 17
Number of atoms in the Observable Universe
Approximately 1080
There are 2 methods to estimate the Number of atoms in the Observable Universe
Critical Density
Critical density ρc = 3 Ho
2
/ 8 π G = 9.9 x 10-27
kg m-3
Density = Mass / Volume , ρc = M / V
where V = (4/3) π R3
(R = 1.3 × 1026
m)
Mass = Number of protons (N) x mass of 1 proton (mp )
So ρc = N x mp / (4/3) π R3
= 9.9 x 10-27
N = ρc x (4/3) π R3
/ mp
N = ( 9.9 x 10-27
) x ((4/3) π ) x (2.2 x 1078
) / 1.67 x 10-27
N ~ 5 x 1079
H atoms
Stellar Density
Mass of typical stars ~ 2 x 1030
kg
Equivalent to N ~ 1 x 1057
H atoms per star (mp = 1.67 x 10-27
kg)
N ~ M / mp~ 2 x 1030
/ 1.67 x 10-27
~ 1 x 1057
Galaxy ~ 400 billion stars (4 x 1011
) Each Galaxy has 1 x 1057
x 4 x 1011
H atoms = 4 x 1068
Universe contains ~ 80 billion Galaxies
So there are 4 x 1068
. 8 x 1010
H atoms in the Observable Universe H atoms ~ 3 x 1079
Both methods give approximately the same number ~ 1080
atoms
Dimensionless ratios of Atomic & Cosmological
Quantities
Summary
• Fine Structure constant 1/137
7.297362 x 10-3
No Units !
• Electromagnetic : Gravitation
coupling constant ~ 1039
• Age of Universe : Atomic light
crossing time ~ 1040
• No of H atoms in the
Observable Universe ~ 1080
≡ Number of protons
• Action of the Universe : Action
of Quantum ~ 10120
(1040
) 2
~ 1080
(1040
) 3
~ 10120
N = Age of Universe / Atomic light crossing time
Time for light to cross the universe / time for light to cross an
atom
Age of Universe = 4.346 x 1017
s
Time = distance / velocity = electron radius / speed of light
Classic electron radius (Lorentz radius ) Thomson scattering
length = e2
/ 4πεo me c2
Atomic light crossing time = e2
/ 4πεo me c3
(time for light to cross an atom)
= (1.6 x 10-19
)2
/ (4 x 3.14159 x 8.85 x 10-12
) . (9.1 x 10-31
)
. ( 3 x 108
)3
= 9.36875 x 10-24
s
N = 4.346 x 1017
/ 9.36875 x 10-24
= 4.6 x 1040
~ 1040
Ratios of the same Quantity have no
No Units !!!
Spooky Or what ?
mp = 1.67262E-27 kg Fine structure constant α = e
2
/ (4π ε0) hc 1 / α
mn = 1.67493E-27 kg Electromagnetic coupling constant 0.007297362 137.035819
me = 9.10938E-31 kg Nuclear Atomic
mp / me = 1836.152663 Gravitational coupling constant αG = G mp
2
/ h c G mpme / h c
(Gmp
2
/h c) /(mp /me) = 3.21596E-42 5.905E-39 3.21596E-42
G = 6.673E-11 N kg-2
m2
Electromagnetic : Gravitational coupling constant α / αG = 2.26911E+39
e = 1.60218E-19 C Strength of Coulomb Electrostatic : Newtonian Gravitational Force
c = 299792458 m s-1
h = 6.62606E-34 Js Planck units G h c
h =h/(2π) = 1.05457E-34 Js Planck mass √ (h c /G) = 2.17665E-08 kg
Planck length √ (G h /c
3
) = 1.6161E-35 m
ε 0 = 8.85419E-12 F m-1
Planck time √ (G h /c
5
) = 5.39072E-44 s
µ0 = 1.25664E-06 H m-1
Planck Temperature √ (h c
5
/G k
2
) = 1.41692E+32 K
k = 1.38065E-23 J K-1
Classic electron radius Lorentz radius (Thomson scattering length)
(mp/me) x α = re = e
2
/ (4π ε0) mec
2
= 2.81743E-15 m
13.40145985
Physics coupling constants,
Planck units Calculator
The fine structure constant
α re-calculated
π = 3.14159...
Circumference / Diameter of a circle
φ = (1 + √5) / 2 = 1.61803...
Golden ratio (extreme to mean ratio of a line)
A x C 1 B
----------------------------------------------------------------
Geometrically Algebraically
x / 1 = (x + 1) / x Solve x2
= x + 1
e = Lt n →∞ (1 + 1/n)n
= 2.71828...
Exponential function Base of Natural Logarithms
φ^(π) ^(-1/e)
= 1.61803^ ((3.14159) ^(- 1/2.71828))
= 1.61803^ ((3.14159) ^(-0.3678796)
= 1.61803^ 0.6563095
=1.37...
α In Quantum Electrodynamics the
strength of the interaction between
electrons & photons
The fine structure constant explained
α = 7.2973525698(24)×10−3
= 1/137.035999074(44)
Eddington Numbers
Fundamental Theory
I believe there are 15 747 724 136 275 002 577 605 653 961 181 555 468 044 717 914 527 116 709 366 231 425
076 185 631 031 296 protons in the universe and the same number of electrons NEdd .
Large number coincidences & the Anthropic
Principle in Cosmology Brandon Carter 1974
“What we can expect to observe must be restricted by the
conditions necessary for our presence as observers”
• The 1st
use of this argument has been argued to
have been used by Fred Hoyle in the prediction
of the 7.656 MeV Carbon resonance although
there is some dispute here on the matter.
• See for example “When is a prediction
anthropic? Fred Hoyle and the 7.65 MeV
carbon resonance”
by Helge Kragh
Reference http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5332/
• Coincidences based on:
• Traditional kind – Stars of varying
sizes & colours (Red Giants to white
dwarfs) have masses ~ 104040
(1 /
Gravitational coupling constant).
Conventional Stellar theory.
• Weak Anthropic reasoning
• The age of the Universe must be
consistent with Observers
• Strong Anthropic reasoning
• We must be here to observe the
Universe
Nucleosynthesis
H : He ~ 73% : 25% (by mass)
The first 33 minutes
Only the Isotopes shown on the left
were created in the Big Bang
All other elements were forged in the
hot interiors of Carbon rich Red
Giant stars or in Supernovae of
massive stars
Proton – Proton Chain
H burning into He
1
1H
1
0n
4
2He
2
1H
3
1H
3
2He
1.1. 11
H+H+11
HH ⇒⇒ 22
H +H + 00
e+e+νν
1 1 1 11 1 1 1
2.2. 22
H +H + 11
HH ⇒⇒ 33
HeHe
1 1 21 1 2
3.3. 33
He+He+33
HeHe ⇒⇒ 44
He+He+11
H +H +11
HH
2 2 2 12 2 2 1
11
The Cosmic Onion
The CNO Cycle
Hans Bethe – proposed CNO Fusion cycle “Energy production in stars” Phys Rev 55, 434-456Hans Bethe – proposed CNO Fusion cycle “Energy production in stars” Phys Rev 55, 434-456
(1939)(1939)
1.1. 1212
C+C+11
pp ⇒⇒ 1313
N +N +γ (γ (1.95MeV)1.95MeV) ⇒⇒ 1313
C+C+ 00
e +e +νν (2.22MeV) 2.(2.22MeV) 2. 1313
C +C + 11
pp ⇒⇒ 1414
N+N+
γ∗γ∗
6 1 7 6 1 e 6 1 76 1 7 6 1 e 6 1 7
3.3. 1414
N +N + 11
pp ⇒⇒ 1515
O +O + γ (γ (7.35MeV)7.35MeV) ⇒⇒ 1515
N +N + 00
e +e + νν (2.75MeV)(2.75MeV)
77 1 8 7 1 e1 8 7 1 e
4.4. 1515
N +N + 11
pp ⇒⇒ 1212
C +C + 44
He + 4.96MeVHe + 4.96MeV
7 1 6 27 1 6 2
1
23
4
The “mass gap” problem
at A = 5, A = 8
A crevasse exists at Atomic mass
number A = 5 and no bridge can
be found at A = 8.
Is the 1952 prediction by Fred
Hoyle of a 7.65 MeV resonance
in Carbon Anthropic ?
Stable Isotope Z A Disint. (T½ ) Atomic weight
1
1H (99.985%)
2
1H (0.015%)
1
1
1
2
Stable
Stable
1.00794
2.014102
3
2He (1.4 x10-4
%)
4
2He (~ 100%)
2
2
3
4
Trace %
Stable
3.016030
4.002604
1
1H + 4
2He
2
1H + 3
2He
1+2
1+2
1+4
2+3
p emission
0.01514%
5.010544
5.030132
6
3Li (7.42%)
7
3Li (~ 92.58%)
3
3
6
7
Low %
Stable
6.01512
7.016
2
1H + 6
3Li
3
1H + 5
3Li
4
2He + 4
2He
5
2He + 3
2He
1+3
1+3
2+2
2+2
2+6
3+5
4+4
5+3
7.435%
β−
(12.3a) + p
2α (3x10-16
s)
n emission + %
8.029222
8.028549
8.003204
8.02833
9
4Be (100%) 4 9 Stable 9.01218
10
5B (80.4%) 5 11 Stable 10.811
12
6C (98.89%) 6 12 Stable 12.000
Fred Hoyle and the 7.656 MeV resonance in 12
C
B2
F H “Synthesis of the Elements in Stars” Rev Mod Phys 1957 vol 29 p547,
The Triple α process
• Energy equivalents of 4
2He (α particle),8
4Be and 12
6C
• 1 u = 1.660538921 x10-27
kg
• E (eV) = m (c2
/ e) = m (kg) x (5.609534842 x 1035
)
• 4
2He = 4.002604 u = 6.646479727 x10-27
kg
= 3 .728365960 GeV
• 2 α 's = 7.456731921 GeV, 3 α 's = 11.18509788 GeV
• 8
4Be = 8.00530 u = 1.329311222 x10-26
kg
= 7.456817618 GeV
• 12
6C = 12 u = 1.992646705 x10-26
kg = 11.17782112 GeV
• 4
2He + 8
4Be - 12
6C = + 7.362458 MeV
∆E ~ 293.542 keV (7.656 – 7.362458) MeV
• 2 (4
2He) - 8
4Be = - 85.697 keV
• 3 (4
2He) - 12
6C = + 7.275759 MeV
∆E ~ 380.241 keV (7.656 – 7.275759) MeV
The Drake Equation and SETI
Is anybody out there ?
The original SETI search at the Greenbank radio telescope
looked in one channel at 1402.5 MHz the 21 cm line in
the Hydrogen spectrum reminescent of the red glow from
interstellar gas, like here in the Horsehead Nebula in the
constellation of Orion.
Civilisation Calculator
R*= 10
fp = 0.5
ne = 2
fl = 1
fi = 0.5
fc = 1
L = 10000
N = 50000
R* - rate of star formation
fp - fraction of stars with
planets
ne - number of earth like
planets
fL - fraction where life occurs
fi - fraction where intelligent
evolves
fc - fraction that are
communicable with universe
L - Lifetime of civilisation
N - Number
Is Life a Cosmic Imperative ?
Three Hurdles need to be overcome for us to communicate with the Cosmos
No Biology only Physics /
Inorganic
Chemistry
Organic Chemistry Biogenesis The origins of
Life... Self replicating molecules
................................
Bacteria/viruses single cell microbes
Life on Earth The Tree of Life
Darwinan evolution
Complex multicellular photosynthetic organisms
6CO2+6H2O + LIGHT = C6H12O6+6O2
Carbon dioxide + Water + Light = SUGARS +
Oxygen
...........
Is Intelligent Life an evolutionary imperative ?
Does this lead to a desire to communicate...
The Fermi Paradox 1950
Where is ET ?
They must have colonized the
Galaxy by now...
So where are they ?
The Eagle Nebula M16
“The Pillars of Creation”
Bibliography &Further reading
8 Books that tell the Lecture in more detail
700 pages of equations Easier to read story The nuts & bolts Story of the Hubble
constant
Easy to read Best Intro The complete story so far... SETI/Are we Alone ? Simple Anthropic
arguments

More Related Content

What's hot

Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_holeCold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_holeSérgio Sacani
 
Large turbulent reservoirs of cold molecular gas around high-redshift starbur...
Large turbulent reservoirs of cold molecular gas around high-redshift starbur...Large turbulent reservoirs of cold molecular gas around high-redshift starbur...
Large turbulent reservoirs of cold molecular gas around high-redshift starbur...Sérgio Sacani
 
Exocometary gas in_th_hd_181327_debris_ring
Exocometary gas in_th_hd_181327_debris_ringExocometary gas in_th_hd_181327_debris_ring
Exocometary gas in_th_hd_181327_debris_ringSérgio Sacani
 
Periodic mass extinctions_and_the_planet_x_model_reconsidered
Periodic mass extinctions_and_the_planet_x_model_reconsideredPeriodic mass extinctions_and_the_planet_x_model_reconsidered
Periodic mass extinctions_and_the_planet_x_model_reconsideredSérgio Sacani
 
The canarias einstein_ring_a_newly_discovered_optical_einstein_ring
The canarias einstein_ring_a_newly_discovered_optical_einstein_ringThe canarias einstein_ring_a_newly_discovered_optical_einstein_ring
The canarias einstein_ring_a_newly_discovered_optical_einstein_ringSérgio Sacani
 
Gwendolyn Eadie: A New Method for Time Series Analysis in Astronomy with an A...
Gwendolyn Eadie: A New Method for Time Series Analysis in Astronomy with an A...Gwendolyn Eadie: A New Method for Time Series Analysis in Astronomy with an A...
Gwendolyn Eadie: A New Method for Time Series Analysis in Astronomy with an A...JeremyHeyl
 
Magnetic interaction of_a_super_cme_with_the_earths_magnetosphere_scenario_fo...
Magnetic interaction of_a_super_cme_with_the_earths_magnetosphere_scenario_fo...Magnetic interaction of_a_super_cme_with_the_earths_magnetosphere_scenario_fo...
Magnetic interaction of_a_super_cme_with_the_earths_magnetosphere_scenario_fo...Sérgio Sacani
 
IB Astrophysics - cosmology - Flippingphysics by nothingnerdy
IB Astrophysics - cosmology - Flippingphysics by nothingnerdyIB Astrophysics - cosmology - Flippingphysics by nothingnerdy
IB Astrophysics - cosmology - Flippingphysics by nothingnerdyNothingnerdy
 
Neven Bilic, "Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Unification Models"
Neven Bilic, "Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Unification Models"Neven Bilic, "Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Unification Models"
Neven Bilic, "Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Unification Models"SEENET-MTP
 
LOW FREQUENCY GW SOURCES: Chapter I: Overview of LISA sources - Alberto Sesana
LOW FREQUENCY GW SOURCES: Chapter I: Overview of LISA sources - Alberto SesanaLOW FREQUENCY GW SOURCES: Chapter I: Overview of LISA sources - Alberto Sesana
LOW FREQUENCY GW SOURCES: Chapter I: Overview of LISA sources - Alberto SesanaLake Como School of Advanced Studies
 
Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects With...
Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects With...Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects With...
Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects With...Sérgio Sacani
 
Cosmological parameter
Cosmological parameterCosmological parameter
Cosmological parameterSubhasis Shit
 
Photometry of Giant Propellers in Saturn's Rings
Photometry of Giant Propellers in Saturn's RingsPhotometry of Giant Propellers in Saturn's Rings
Photometry of Giant Propellers in Saturn's RingsJakaylaRobinson
 
The characterization of_the_gamma_ray_signal_from_the_central_milk_way_a_comp...
The characterization of_the_gamma_ray_signal_from_the_central_milk_way_a_comp...The characterization of_the_gamma_ray_signal_from_the_central_milk_way_a_comp...
The characterization of_the_gamma_ray_signal_from_the_central_milk_way_a_comp...Sérgio Sacani
 
The 19 Feb. 2016 Outburst of Comet 67P/CG: An ESA Rosetta Multi-Instrument Study
The 19 Feb. 2016 Outburst of Comet 67P/CG: An ESA Rosetta Multi-Instrument StudyThe 19 Feb. 2016 Outburst of Comet 67P/CG: An ESA Rosetta Multi-Instrument Study
The 19 Feb. 2016 Outburst of Comet 67P/CG: An ESA Rosetta Multi-Instrument StudySérgio Sacani
 
Ringed structure and_a_gap_at_1_au_in_the_nearest_protoplanetary_disk
Ringed structure and_a_gap_at_1_au_in_the_nearest_protoplanetary_diskRinged structure and_a_gap_at_1_au_in_the_nearest_protoplanetary_disk
Ringed structure and_a_gap_at_1_au_in_the_nearest_protoplanetary_diskSérgio Sacani
 
Faltenbacher - Simulating the Universe
Faltenbacher - Simulating the UniverseFaltenbacher - Simulating the Universe
Faltenbacher - Simulating the UniverseCosmoAIMS Bassett
 
Moon formation sasaki
Moon formation sasakiMoon formation sasaki
Moon formation sasakinoinoi79528
 

What's hot (19)

Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_holeCold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
Cold clumpy accretion_toward_an_active_supermasive_black_hole
 
Large turbulent reservoirs of cold molecular gas around high-redshift starbur...
Large turbulent reservoirs of cold molecular gas around high-redshift starbur...Large turbulent reservoirs of cold molecular gas around high-redshift starbur...
Large turbulent reservoirs of cold molecular gas around high-redshift starbur...
 
Ehgamberdiev 07082017
Ehgamberdiev 07082017Ehgamberdiev 07082017
Ehgamberdiev 07082017
 
Exocometary gas in_th_hd_181327_debris_ring
Exocometary gas in_th_hd_181327_debris_ringExocometary gas in_th_hd_181327_debris_ring
Exocometary gas in_th_hd_181327_debris_ring
 
Periodic mass extinctions_and_the_planet_x_model_reconsidered
Periodic mass extinctions_and_the_planet_x_model_reconsideredPeriodic mass extinctions_and_the_planet_x_model_reconsidered
Periodic mass extinctions_and_the_planet_x_model_reconsidered
 
The canarias einstein_ring_a_newly_discovered_optical_einstein_ring
The canarias einstein_ring_a_newly_discovered_optical_einstein_ringThe canarias einstein_ring_a_newly_discovered_optical_einstein_ring
The canarias einstein_ring_a_newly_discovered_optical_einstein_ring
 
Gwendolyn Eadie: A New Method for Time Series Analysis in Astronomy with an A...
Gwendolyn Eadie: A New Method for Time Series Analysis in Astronomy with an A...Gwendolyn Eadie: A New Method for Time Series Analysis in Astronomy with an A...
Gwendolyn Eadie: A New Method for Time Series Analysis in Astronomy with an A...
 
Magnetic interaction of_a_super_cme_with_the_earths_magnetosphere_scenario_fo...
Magnetic interaction of_a_super_cme_with_the_earths_magnetosphere_scenario_fo...Magnetic interaction of_a_super_cme_with_the_earths_magnetosphere_scenario_fo...
Magnetic interaction of_a_super_cme_with_the_earths_magnetosphere_scenario_fo...
 
IB Astrophysics - cosmology - Flippingphysics by nothingnerdy
IB Astrophysics - cosmology - Flippingphysics by nothingnerdyIB Astrophysics - cosmology - Flippingphysics by nothingnerdy
IB Astrophysics - cosmology - Flippingphysics by nothingnerdy
 
Neven Bilic, "Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Unification Models"
Neven Bilic, "Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Unification Models"Neven Bilic, "Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Unification Models"
Neven Bilic, "Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Unification Models"
 
LOW FREQUENCY GW SOURCES: Chapter I: Overview of LISA sources - Alberto Sesana
LOW FREQUENCY GW SOURCES: Chapter I: Overview of LISA sources - Alberto SesanaLOW FREQUENCY GW SOURCES: Chapter I: Overview of LISA sources - Alberto Sesana
LOW FREQUENCY GW SOURCES: Chapter I: Overview of LISA sources - Alberto Sesana
 
Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects With...
Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects With...Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects With...
Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects With...
 
Cosmological parameter
Cosmological parameterCosmological parameter
Cosmological parameter
 
Photometry of Giant Propellers in Saturn's Rings
Photometry of Giant Propellers in Saturn's RingsPhotometry of Giant Propellers in Saturn's Rings
Photometry of Giant Propellers in Saturn's Rings
 
The characterization of_the_gamma_ray_signal_from_the_central_milk_way_a_comp...
The characterization of_the_gamma_ray_signal_from_the_central_milk_way_a_comp...The characterization of_the_gamma_ray_signal_from_the_central_milk_way_a_comp...
The characterization of_the_gamma_ray_signal_from_the_central_milk_way_a_comp...
 
The 19 Feb. 2016 Outburst of Comet 67P/CG: An ESA Rosetta Multi-Instrument Study
The 19 Feb. 2016 Outburst of Comet 67P/CG: An ESA Rosetta Multi-Instrument StudyThe 19 Feb. 2016 Outburst of Comet 67P/CG: An ESA Rosetta Multi-Instrument Study
The 19 Feb. 2016 Outburst of Comet 67P/CG: An ESA Rosetta Multi-Instrument Study
 
Ringed structure and_a_gap_at_1_au_in_the_nearest_protoplanetary_disk
Ringed structure and_a_gap_at_1_au_in_the_nearest_protoplanetary_diskRinged structure and_a_gap_at_1_au_in_the_nearest_protoplanetary_disk
Ringed structure and_a_gap_at_1_au_in_the_nearest_protoplanetary_disk
 
Faltenbacher - Simulating the Universe
Faltenbacher - Simulating the UniverseFaltenbacher - Simulating the Universe
Faltenbacher - Simulating the Universe
 
Moon formation sasaki
Moon formation sasakiMoon formation sasaki
Moon formation sasaki
 

Similar to Anthropic Principle, Cosmological Coincidences & the Fermi Paradox

Apartes de la Charla: TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE MAY 29, 1919
Apartes de la Charla: TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE MAY 29, 1919Apartes de la Charla: TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE MAY 29, 1919
Apartes de la Charla: TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE MAY 29, 1919SOCIEDAD JULIO GARAVITO
 
Galaxies_BigBang_Dark Matter
Galaxies_BigBang_Dark MatterGalaxies_BigBang_Dark Matter
Galaxies_BigBang_Dark MatterStephen Perrenod
 
Pawan Kumar Relativistic jets in tidal disruption events
Pawan Kumar	Relativistic jets in tidal disruption eventsPawan Kumar	Relativistic jets in tidal disruption events
Pawan Kumar Relativistic jets in tidal disruption eventsBaurzhan Alzhanov
 
High Energy Astrophysics Dissertation
High Energy Astrophysics DissertationHigh Energy Astrophysics Dissertation
High Energy Astrophysics DissertationAlexander Booth
 
stellar struture and evolution
stellar struture and evolutionstellar struture and evolution
stellar struture and evolutionNiwamanya Rick
 
Cosmic Histories and human perspectives: A journey through time and space
Cosmic Histories and human perspectives:  A journey through time and spaceCosmic Histories and human perspectives:  A journey through time and space
Cosmic Histories and human perspectives: A journey through time and spaceHayato Shimabukuro
 
The Universe in Your Backyard
The Universe in Your BackyardThe Universe in Your Backyard
The Universe in Your Backyardscratchpost
 
Ccmc Universo
Ccmc UniversoCcmc Universo
Ccmc Universodiegotrap
 
Ccmc Universo
Ccmc UniversoCcmc Universo
Ccmc Universodiegotrap
 
ILOA Galaxy Forum Europe 2013 - dark matter in galaxies - dr benoit famaey
ILOA Galaxy Forum Europe 2013 - dark matter in galaxies - dr benoit famaeyILOA Galaxy Forum Europe 2013 - dark matter in galaxies - dr benoit famaey
ILOA Galaxy Forum Europe 2013 - dark matter in galaxies - dr benoit famaeyILOAHawaii
 
Class%20presentation.ppt
Class%20presentation.pptClass%20presentation.ppt
Class%20presentation.pptHemenGogoi1
 

Similar to Anthropic Principle, Cosmological Coincidences & the Fermi Paradox (20)

Apartes de la Charla: TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE MAY 29, 1919
Apartes de la Charla: TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE MAY 29, 1919Apartes de la Charla: TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE MAY 29, 1919
Apartes de la Charla: TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE MAY 29, 1919
 
Galaxies_BigBang_Dark Matter
Galaxies_BigBang_Dark MatterGalaxies_BigBang_Dark Matter
Galaxies_BigBang_Dark Matter
 
Presentation.pptx
Presentation.pptxPresentation.pptx
Presentation.pptx
 
Problem a ph o 1
Problem a ph o 1Problem a ph o 1
Problem a ph o 1
 
Pawan Kumar Relativistic jets in tidal disruption events
Pawan Kumar	Relativistic jets in tidal disruption eventsPawan Kumar	Relativistic jets in tidal disruption events
Pawan Kumar Relativistic jets in tidal disruption events
 
High Energy Astrophysics Dissertation
High Energy Astrophysics DissertationHigh Energy Astrophysics Dissertation
High Energy Astrophysics Dissertation
 
Gravitation ppt
Gravitation pptGravitation ppt
Gravitation ppt
 
stellar struture and evolution
stellar struture and evolutionstellar struture and evolution
stellar struture and evolution
 
Cosmic Histories and human perspectives: A journey through time and space
Cosmic Histories and human perspectives:  A journey through time and spaceCosmic Histories and human perspectives:  A journey through time and space
Cosmic Histories and human perspectives: A journey through time and space
 
The Universe in Your Backyard
The Universe in Your BackyardThe Universe in Your Backyard
The Universe in Your Backyard
 
BASICS OF COSMOLOGY
BASICS OF COSMOLOGYBASICS OF COSMOLOGY
BASICS OF COSMOLOGY
 
Ccmc Universo
Ccmc UniversoCcmc Universo
Ccmc Universo
 
Ccmc Universo
Ccmc UniversoCcmc Universo
Ccmc Universo
 
ILOA Galaxy Forum Europe 2013 - dark matter in galaxies - dr benoit famaey
ILOA Galaxy Forum Europe 2013 - dark matter in galaxies - dr benoit famaeyILOA Galaxy Forum Europe 2013 - dark matter in galaxies - dr benoit famaey
ILOA Galaxy Forum Europe 2013 - dark matter in galaxies - dr benoit famaey
 
Astronomy group-1
Astronomy group-1Astronomy group-1
Astronomy group-1
 
Class%20presentation.ppt
Class%20presentation.pptClass%20presentation.ppt
Class%20presentation.ppt
 
Aa15425 10
Aa15425 10Aa15425 10
Aa15425 10
 
gravity.ppt
gravity.pptgravity.ppt
gravity.ppt
 
L26.ppt
L26.pptL26.ppt
L26.ppt
 
L3 emr
L3 emrL3 emr
L3 emr
 

Anthropic Principle, Cosmological Coincidences & the Fermi Paradox

  • 1. The Anthropic principle, Cosmological number coincidences & the Fermi Paradox… Jim Kelly FRAS ©jfK April 2015 The Allen Telescope Array Berkeley California The Drake Equation N = R* fp ne fl fi fc L
  • 2. http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/369/1936.toc?etoc Phil Trans Royal Soc 2011 Vol 13 p 499-699 Audio 2010 The detection of extra-terrestrial life - Discussion Meetings - The Royal Society.mht
  • 3. Why are the values of certain numbers linked to Life…? Numbers in the Cosmos • The Hubble constant: Age, size & mass of the Observable Universe (Big Bang Cosmology) • The fine structure constant α ~ 1 /137 (electromagnetic coupling) (The Constants of Nature: π = 3.14159... φ = 1.161803... e = 2.71828) • The Anthropic principle and Large numbers 1040 , 1080 , 10120 (Dimensionless ratios of Atomic & Cosmological Quantities ) • Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and the 7.65MeV Carbon resonance (The work of Fred Hoyle explained as Anthropic reasoning) • The Drake equation & the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (Overcoming the hurdles to communicating with the Cosmos) • The Fermi paradox and Life in the Galaxy... (The eerie silence.... ET phone Home ! Where is everybody ? )
  • 4. Nuclear masses & Energy equivalents Statistical Thermodynamics, Quantum Mechanics & Atomic Physics Gravitation, Electromagnetism Name symbol value Tera T x 1012 Trillion Giga G x 109 Billion Mega M x 106 Million kilo k x 103 milli m x 10-3 micro µ x 10-6 nano n x 10-9 pico p x 10-12 SI Units Mass (Kg) Length (m) Time (s)
  • 5. The 4 Pillars of Big Bang Cosmology Our current understanding of the Universe 1. Hubble expansion: distance-redshift relation Age of Universe (1929) 2. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Temperature (COBE) ~ 2.7K (1989) 3. Interstellar H / He Abundance Stellar Nucleosynthesis B2 F H (1957) 4. Distribution & evolution of Galaxies (Timeline) Lambda (Λ) Cold Dark Matter Model (WMAP) Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 2001 Doppler Effect
  • 6. Pillars of Creation…. Evidence for the Big Bang • Expanding universe – Hubble’s Law (H = v / d) Edwin Hubble 1929 spectroscopically measured the redshifts of distant galaxies with the 100” Hooker telescope at the Mount Wilson Observatory, the rest as they say is history… • Cosmic Microwave Background – CMB radiation Penzias & Wilson received the 1978 Physics Nobel Prize for their discovery of the relic radiation left over from the Big Bang – microwaves at a temperature of ~ 2.7K 2006 Nobel Prize Smoot & Mather–Blackbody/Anisotropy of the CMB-seeds of large scale structure • Elemental abundances 4 He/H, Deuterium, 3 He, 7 Li Burbidge, Burbidge, Fowler & Hoyle (the Classic 1957 B2 FH paper) predicted the “Synthesis of elements in the stars”. Primordial ratios predicted by Alpher, Gamow 1948 (Famous α β γ paper) • Olbers’ paradox – Why is the night sky so dark ? Problem – If the Universe is infinite, eternal & filled with stars we ought to see a bright night sky Solution – One of the 3 assumptions must be wrong: Starlight hasn’t had the time to brighten the whole sky. Edgar Allan Poe first recognised this. By looking at the night sky is the simplest & clearest evidence that the Universe had a beginning…. Eagle Nebula M61Eagle Nebula M61
  • 7. • The Hubble Deep Field • ~ 10 days Dec 1995 The age (s), size (m) and mass (kg) of the Observable Universe
  • 8. Expansion of the Universe Radiation era dominated by Dark ages
  • 9. 1010-43-43 ss QuantumQuantum Gravity eraGravity era Cosmic microwave backgroundCosmic microwave background Surface of last scatterSurface of last scatter LightLight 13.7 billion13.7 billion yearsyears Gravitational wavesGravitational waves NowNow The Big Picture….The Big Picture…. SpaceSpace TimeTime PlanckPlanck scalescale GrandGrand UnificationUnification EpochEpoch ElectroweaElectrowea kk 1010-10-10 ssLeptonLepton EpochEpoch 1010 22 ss 1010 1313 ss Photon EpochPhoton Epoch 1 Billion years1 Billion years Confinement of quarksConfinement of quarks p,np,n Nucleosynthesis of HeNucleosynthesis of He Decoupling of Matter-RadiationDecoupling of Matter-Radiation AtomsAtoms Galaxy Star formationGalaxy Star formation MatterMatter DominatedDominated Era > 10Era > 10 22 ss RadiationRadiation DominatedDominated Era < 10Era < 10 22 ss The Universe becomes transparentThe Universe becomes transparent 1010-35-35 s Cosmic Inflations Cosmic Inflation 380,000 years380,000 years ≡≡ 1010 1313 ss
  • 10. M104 Sombrero Galaxy ~29M Lyr Messier 49 ~55M Lyr M31 Andromeda Galaxy ~2M Lyr Hubble constant Ho = ? (km/s) / Mparsec [ slope of Graph ] 1 parsec ~ 3.26 light years = 3.08568025 × 1016 metres Ho ~ ( ? ) s-1
  • 11. Cosmological distance ladder I (Earth-Moon-Sun) 1. 2.3. 1. Earth’s circumference – Eratosthenes noticed that a well in Syene (modern day Aswan on the Tropic of Cancer), Egypt was light directly from above (12pm) on the Summer solstice while a stick at Alexandria cast a shadow of 7.2° due to the Earth’s curvature. Knowing the distance between these two places (~ 500 stadia, Olympia) enabled an estimate of the Earth’s circumference. Taking a stadia as 185m can you calculate the Earth’s Circumference ? s = r .Ɵ Knowing a circular distance of 500x185 m corresponds to 7.2° it is easy to find the distance that corresponds to 360°. 2. Relative diameter Earth / Moon – During a lunar eclipse the time it takes for the shadow of the earth to cover the moon is ~ 50 mins, about ¼ of the time it takes for the moon to re-emerge into light again ~ 200 mins. Therefore the Earth is ~ 4 x larger than the moon. 3. Lunar distance – Using similar triangles an extended thumb of known distance subtends the same angle as the larger lunar triangle (when obscured) where the lunar size in 2. can be used to estimate the distance Earth - Moon. s r
  • 12. Cosmological distance ladder II Greeks Anaxagoras of Anatolia (c500-428 BC) – explained eclipes (moonshine merely reflected sunshine). Aristarchus of Samos (c310-230 BC) – measured the angle between the moon when directly overhead and the sun (hence perpendicular) in order to determine the earth-moon/earth-sun ratio. Eratosthenes (c276-193 BC) measured the Earth’s circumference (see Fig 1.) 4. Figures due to Aristarhcus. See modern distances right, Moon–Earth-Sun angle θ ~ 89.85° 5. 4. Solar distance – knowing the Earth-Moon distance (Fig 3) and measuring the angle between the moon and sun it is a matter of trigonometry to calculate the distance to the Sun. 5. Solar size – Knowing that during a Solar Eclipse the Moon exactly covers the face of the sun it is possible to determine the Solar diameter by knowing the size of the moon. Check yourself above. Typical modern day values Earth’s circumference = 40,100 km Earth’s diameter = 12,750 km Moon’s diameter = 3480 km Sun’s diameter = 1,390,000 km Earth – Moon distance = 384,000 km Earth – Sun distance = 150,000,000 km
  • 13. 1 parsec (parallax of 1 arc second) coined 1913 00 00' 01’’ (1/60 x 60 degrees) Herbert Hall Turner
  • 14. Uncertainty in measurement %e ~ (δx / x) . 100% Measuring the Hubble constant Ho • Ho = 71.0 +/-1.4 (km/s) / Mparsec (WMAP 7 year result 2010) • Ho = 72 +/-8 (km/s) / Mparsec (HST 2001 Cepheid variable star measurements) • Ho = 72.6 +/-3.1 (km/s) / Mparsec (HST 2010 Gravitational lensing measurements) • Ho = 73.8 +/-2.4 (km/s) / Mparsec (HST 2011 infrared camera redshift of various astronomical objects) • Ho = 74.2 +/-3.6 (km/s) / Mparsec (HST 2009) • Ho = 77.0 +/-15% (km/s) / Mparsec (2006 Chandra X-ray Observatory) Andromeda Galaxy 2 Million light years Hubble Calculator INPUT Ho = 71 km s^-1/Mparsec Ho = 2.30E-18 s^-1 1 / Ho = 4.35E+17 s Age 1.38E+10 yr Universe 13.78117 Gyr
  • 15. Action of the Observable Universe = mass x size2 / time (Js) Action of Quantum (Planck’s constant) h = 6.6 x 10 -34 Js Action of the Universe / Action of Quantum = A Dimensionless Number ~ 8.51 x 10 86 / 6.626 x 10 -34 ~ 1 x 10 120 Age (Time since Big Bang) (Back of an envelope calculation !) Units of Ho = s -1 So therefore 1/ Ho = s T = 1 / Ho = 1 / 2.30095 × 10-18 s T = 4.34603 x10 17 s ~ 13.781 Gyr Size (of the observable universe – distance light has travelled since the Big Bang) R ~ c / Ho (not including redshift) R ~ 3 × 108 / 2.30095 × 10-18 R ~ 1.30 × 10 26 m Mass (Not including Dark Matter or Dark Energy) Estimate based on Critical density ρc = 3 Ho 2 / 8 π G = 9.9 x 10-27 kg m-3 ρc = M / V = M / R3 So M = ρc x R3 M = 9.9 x 10-27 x (1.25 × 10 26 ) 3 M ~ 2.2 x 10 52 kg Action Action = Js = Nms = kg m s-2 m s = mass x size2 / time = M x R2 / T 52 26 2 17
  • 16. Number of atoms in the Observable Universe Approximately 1080 There are 2 methods to estimate the Number of atoms in the Observable Universe Critical Density Critical density ρc = 3 Ho 2 / 8 π G = 9.9 x 10-27 kg m-3 Density = Mass / Volume , ρc = M / V where V = (4/3) π R3 (R = 1.3 × 1026 m) Mass = Number of protons (N) x mass of 1 proton (mp ) So ρc = N x mp / (4/3) π R3 = 9.9 x 10-27 N = ρc x (4/3) π R3 / mp N = ( 9.9 x 10-27 ) x ((4/3) π ) x (2.2 x 1078 ) / 1.67 x 10-27 N ~ 5 x 1079 H atoms Stellar Density Mass of typical stars ~ 2 x 1030 kg Equivalent to N ~ 1 x 1057 H atoms per star (mp = 1.67 x 10-27 kg) N ~ M / mp~ 2 x 1030 / 1.67 x 10-27 ~ 1 x 1057 Galaxy ~ 400 billion stars (4 x 1011 ) Each Galaxy has 1 x 1057 x 4 x 1011 H atoms = 4 x 1068 Universe contains ~ 80 billion Galaxies So there are 4 x 1068 . 8 x 1010 H atoms in the Observable Universe H atoms ~ 3 x 1079 Both methods give approximately the same number ~ 1080 atoms
  • 17. Dimensionless ratios of Atomic & Cosmological Quantities Summary • Fine Structure constant 1/137 7.297362 x 10-3 No Units ! • Electromagnetic : Gravitation coupling constant ~ 1039 • Age of Universe : Atomic light crossing time ~ 1040 • No of H atoms in the Observable Universe ~ 1080 ≡ Number of protons • Action of the Universe : Action of Quantum ~ 10120 (1040 ) 2 ~ 1080 (1040 ) 3 ~ 10120 N = Age of Universe / Atomic light crossing time Time for light to cross the universe / time for light to cross an atom Age of Universe = 4.346 x 1017 s Time = distance / velocity = electron radius / speed of light Classic electron radius (Lorentz radius ) Thomson scattering length = e2 / 4πεo me c2 Atomic light crossing time = e2 / 4πεo me c3 (time for light to cross an atom) = (1.6 x 10-19 )2 / (4 x 3.14159 x 8.85 x 10-12 ) . (9.1 x 10-31 ) . ( 3 x 108 )3 = 9.36875 x 10-24 s N = 4.346 x 1017 / 9.36875 x 10-24 = 4.6 x 1040 ~ 1040 Ratios of the same Quantity have no No Units !!! Spooky Or what ?
  • 18. mp = 1.67262E-27 kg Fine structure constant α = e 2 / (4π ε0) hc 1 / α mn = 1.67493E-27 kg Electromagnetic coupling constant 0.007297362 137.035819 me = 9.10938E-31 kg Nuclear Atomic mp / me = 1836.152663 Gravitational coupling constant αG = G mp 2 / h c G mpme / h c (Gmp 2 /h c) /(mp /me) = 3.21596E-42 5.905E-39 3.21596E-42 G = 6.673E-11 N kg-2 m2 Electromagnetic : Gravitational coupling constant α / αG = 2.26911E+39 e = 1.60218E-19 C Strength of Coulomb Electrostatic : Newtonian Gravitational Force c = 299792458 m s-1 h = 6.62606E-34 Js Planck units G h c h =h/(2π) = 1.05457E-34 Js Planck mass √ (h c /G) = 2.17665E-08 kg Planck length √ (G h /c 3 ) = 1.6161E-35 m ε 0 = 8.85419E-12 F m-1 Planck time √ (G h /c 5 ) = 5.39072E-44 s µ0 = 1.25664E-06 H m-1 Planck Temperature √ (h c 5 /G k 2 ) = 1.41692E+32 K k = 1.38065E-23 J K-1 Classic electron radius Lorentz radius (Thomson scattering length) (mp/me) x α = re = e 2 / (4π ε0) mec 2 = 2.81743E-15 m 13.40145985 Physics coupling constants, Planck units Calculator
  • 19. The fine structure constant α re-calculated π = 3.14159... Circumference / Diameter of a circle φ = (1 + √5) / 2 = 1.61803... Golden ratio (extreme to mean ratio of a line) A x C 1 B ---------------------------------------------------------------- Geometrically Algebraically x / 1 = (x + 1) / x Solve x2 = x + 1 e = Lt n →∞ (1 + 1/n)n = 2.71828... Exponential function Base of Natural Logarithms φ^(π) ^(-1/e) = 1.61803^ ((3.14159) ^(- 1/2.71828)) = 1.61803^ ((3.14159) ^(-0.3678796) = 1.61803^ 0.6563095 =1.37... α In Quantum Electrodynamics the strength of the interaction between electrons & photons
  • 20. The fine structure constant explained α = 7.2973525698(24)×10−3 = 1/137.035999074(44)
  • 21. Eddington Numbers Fundamental Theory I believe there are 15 747 724 136 275 002 577 605 653 961 181 555 468 044 717 914 527 116 709 366 231 425 076 185 631 031 296 protons in the universe and the same number of electrons NEdd .
  • 22. Large number coincidences & the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology Brandon Carter 1974 “What we can expect to observe must be restricted by the conditions necessary for our presence as observers” • The 1st use of this argument has been argued to have been used by Fred Hoyle in the prediction of the 7.656 MeV Carbon resonance although there is some dispute here on the matter. • See for example “When is a prediction anthropic? Fred Hoyle and the 7.65 MeV carbon resonance” by Helge Kragh Reference http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5332/ • Coincidences based on: • Traditional kind – Stars of varying sizes & colours (Red Giants to white dwarfs) have masses ~ 104040 (1 / Gravitational coupling constant). Conventional Stellar theory. • Weak Anthropic reasoning • The age of the Universe must be consistent with Observers • Strong Anthropic reasoning • We must be here to observe the Universe
  • 23. Nucleosynthesis H : He ~ 73% : 25% (by mass) The first 33 minutes Only the Isotopes shown on the left were created in the Big Bang All other elements were forged in the hot interiors of Carbon rich Red Giant stars or in Supernovae of massive stars Proton – Proton Chain H burning into He 1 1H 1 0n 4 2He 2 1H 3 1H 3 2He 1.1. 11 H+H+11 HH ⇒⇒ 22 H +H + 00 e+e+νν 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 2.2. 22 H +H + 11 HH ⇒⇒ 33 HeHe 1 1 21 1 2 3.3. 33 He+He+33 HeHe ⇒⇒ 44 He+He+11 H +H +11 HH 2 2 2 12 2 2 1 11
  • 24. The Cosmic Onion The CNO Cycle Hans Bethe – proposed CNO Fusion cycle “Energy production in stars” Phys Rev 55, 434-456Hans Bethe – proposed CNO Fusion cycle “Energy production in stars” Phys Rev 55, 434-456 (1939)(1939) 1.1. 1212 C+C+11 pp ⇒⇒ 1313 N +N +γ (γ (1.95MeV)1.95MeV) ⇒⇒ 1313 C+C+ 00 e +e +νν (2.22MeV) 2.(2.22MeV) 2. 1313 C +C + 11 pp ⇒⇒ 1414 N+N+ γ∗γ∗ 6 1 7 6 1 e 6 1 76 1 7 6 1 e 6 1 7 3.3. 1414 N +N + 11 pp ⇒⇒ 1515 O +O + γ (γ (7.35MeV)7.35MeV) ⇒⇒ 1515 N +N + 00 e +e + νν (2.75MeV)(2.75MeV) 77 1 8 7 1 e1 8 7 1 e 4.4. 1515 N +N + 11 pp ⇒⇒ 1212 C +C + 44 He + 4.96MeVHe + 4.96MeV 7 1 6 27 1 6 2 1 23 4
  • 25. The “mass gap” problem at A = 5, A = 8 A crevasse exists at Atomic mass number A = 5 and no bridge can be found at A = 8. Is the 1952 prediction by Fred Hoyle of a 7.65 MeV resonance in Carbon Anthropic ? Stable Isotope Z A Disint. (T½ ) Atomic weight 1 1H (99.985%) 2 1H (0.015%) 1 1 1 2 Stable Stable 1.00794 2.014102 3 2He (1.4 x10-4 %) 4 2He (~ 100%) 2 2 3 4 Trace % Stable 3.016030 4.002604 1 1H + 4 2He 2 1H + 3 2He 1+2 1+2 1+4 2+3 p emission 0.01514% 5.010544 5.030132 6 3Li (7.42%) 7 3Li (~ 92.58%) 3 3 6 7 Low % Stable 6.01512 7.016 2 1H + 6 3Li 3 1H + 5 3Li 4 2He + 4 2He 5 2He + 3 2He 1+3 1+3 2+2 2+2 2+6 3+5 4+4 5+3 7.435% β− (12.3a) + p 2α (3x10-16 s) n emission + % 8.029222 8.028549 8.003204 8.02833 9 4Be (100%) 4 9 Stable 9.01218 10 5B (80.4%) 5 11 Stable 10.811 12 6C (98.89%) 6 12 Stable 12.000
  • 26. Fred Hoyle and the 7.656 MeV resonance in 12 C B2 F H “Synthesis of the Elements in Stars” Rev Mod Phys 1957 vol 29 p547, The Triple α process • Energy equivalents of 4 2He (α particle),8 4Be and 12 6C • 1 u = 1.660538921 x10-27 kg • E (eV) = m (c2 / e) = m (kg) x (5.609534842 x 1035 ) • 4 2He = 4.002604 u = 6.646479727 x10-27 kg = 3 .728365960 GeV • 2 α 's = 7.456731921 GeV, 3 α 's = 11.18509788 GeV • 8 4Be = 8.00530 u = 1.329311222 x10-26 kg = 7.456817618 GeV • 12 6C = 12 u = 1.992646705 x10-26 kg = 11.17782112 GeV • 4 2He + 8 4Be - 12 6C = + 7.362458 MeV ∆E ~ 293.542 keV (7.656 – 7.362458) MeV • 2 (4 2He) - 8 4Be = - 85.697 keV • 3 (4 2He) - 12 6C = + 7.275759 MeV ∆E ~ 380.241 keV (7.656 – 7.275759) MeV
  • 27. The Drake Equation and SETI Is anybody out there ? The original SETI search at the Greenbank radio telescope looked in one channel at 1402.5 MHz the 21 cm line in the Hydrogen spectrum reminescent of the red glow from interstellar gas, like here in the Horsehead Nebula in the constellation of Orion. Civilisation Calculator R*= 10 fp = 0.5 ne = 2 fl = 1 fi = 0.5 fc = 1 L = 10000 N = 50000 R* - rate of star formation fp - fraction of stars with planets ne - number of earth like planets fL - fraction where life occurs fi - fraction where intelligent evolves fc - fraction that are communicable with universe L - Lifetime of civilisation N - Number
  • 28. Is Life a Cosmic Imperative ? Three Hurdles need to be overcome for us to communicate with the Cosmos No Biology only Physics / Inorganic Chemistry Organic Chemistry Biogenesis The origins of Life... Self replicating molecules ................................ Bacteria/viruses single cell microbes Life on Earth The Tree of Life Darwinan evolution Complex multicellular photosynthetic organisms 6CO2+6H2O + LIGHT = C6H12O6+6O2 Carbon dioxide + Water + Light = SUGARS + Oxygen ........... Is Intelligent Life an evolutionary imperative ? Does this lead to a desire to communicate...
  • 29. The Fermi Paradox 1950 Where is ET ? They must have colonized the Galaxy by now... So where are they ? The Eagle Nebula M16 “The Pillars of Creation”
  • 30. Bibliography &Further reading 8 Books that tell the Lecture in more detail 700 pages of equations Easier to read story The nuts & bolts Story of the Hubble constant Easy to read Best Intro The complete story so far... SETI/Are we Alone ? Simple Anthropic arguments