This document provides an overview of PKI administration using EJBCA and OpenCA certificate authorities. It describes the key concepts of PKIs, including certification authorities, digital certificates, certificate revocation lists, root CAs, subordinate CAs, registration authorities, and end entities. It then analyzes the architecture and administration of EJBCA, an enterprise Java-based CA, including creating the super administrator, configuring data sources, publishing certificates, generating certificate authorities, registration authorities, end entities, and certificate revocation lists.
Authentication and Authorization ModelsCSCJournals
In computer science distributed systems could be more secured with a distributed trust model based on either PKI or Kerberos. However, it becomes difficult to establish trust relationship across heterogeneous domains due to different actual trust mechanism and security policy as well as the intrinsic flaw of each trust model. Since Internet has been used commonly in information systems technologies, many applications need some security capabilities to protect against threats to the communication of information. Two critical procedures of these capabilities are authentication and authorization. This report presents a strong authentication and authorization model using three standard frameworks. They are PKI, PMI, and Directory. The trust in this approach is enabled by the use of public key infrastructure (PKI) which is applied for client two-factor authentication and secures the infrastructure. We introduce the preventive activity-based authorization policy for dynamic user privilege controls. It helps prevent successive unauthorized requests in a formal manner. At the core, we apply the Multi-Agent System (MAS) concept to facilitate the authentication and the authorization process in order to work with multi-applications and multi-clients more dynamically and efficiently.
Security+ Guide to Network Security Fundamentals, 3rd Edition, by Mark Ciampa
Knowledge and skills required for Network Administrators and Information Technology professionals to be aware of security vulnerabilities, to implement security measures, to analyze an existing network environment in consideration of known security threats or risks, to defend against attacks or viruses, and to ensure data privacy and integrity. Terminology and procedures for implementation and configuration of security, including access control, authorization, encryption, packet filters, firewalls, and Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).
CNIT 120: Network Security
http://samsclass.info/120/120_S09.shtml#lecture
Policy: http://samsclass.info/policy_use.htm
Many thanks to Sam Bowne for allowing to publish these presentations.
REMOVAL OF CERTIFICATES FROM SET PROTOCOL USING CERTIFICATELESS PUBLIC KEY CR...IJNSA Journal
Secure Electronic Transaction (SET) is a standard e-commerce protocol for securing credit card transactions over insecure networks. In a transaction using SET, all the members need public key certificates in order to authenticate their public key. Certificates are created by certificate authorities (CAs), The process of getting certificates from a certificate authority(CA) for any SET participants involves a large number of procedures like sending request to issue a certificates, getting approval or
rejection of request and finally obtain the certificates, which is essentially time consuming as because these are associated with certificate management, including renew, revocation ,storage and distribution and the computational cost of certificate verification, also the chain of verification can be quite long, depending on the certificate hierarchy. So, the issues associated with certificate management are quite complex and costly.The present paper attempts the removal of the certificates using the ‘certificateless public key cryptography (CL-PKC)’ . The basic idea of CL-PKC is to generate a public/private key pair for a user by using a master key of a Key Generation Center (KGC) with a random secret value selected by the user. Hence, CL-PKC eliminates the use of certificates in traditional PKC and solves the key escrow problem in ID-PKC.The comparison with existing SET implementation is also addressed in the paper that shows the effectiveness of the proposal.
Authentication and Authorization ModelsCSCJournals
In computer science distributed systems could be more secured with a distributed trust model based on either PKI or Kerberos. However, it becomes difficult to establish trust relationship across heterogeneous domains due to different actual trust mechanism and security policy as well as the intrinsic flaw of each trust model. Since Internet has been used commonly in information systems technologies, many applications need some security capabilities to protect against threats to the communication of information. Two critical procedures of these capabilities are authentication and authorization. This report presents a strong authentication and authorization model using three standard frameworks. They are PKI, PMI, and Directory. The trust in this approach is enabled by the use of public key infrastructure (PKI) which is applied for client two-factor authentication and secures the infrastructure. We introduce the preventive activity-based authorization policy for dynamic user privilege controls. It helps prevent successive unauthorized requests in a formal manner. At the core, we apply the Multi-Agent System (MAS) concept to facilitate the authentication and the authorization process in order to work with multi-applications and multi-clients more dynamically and efficiently.
Security+ Guide to Network Security Fundamentals, 3rd Edition, by Mark Ciampa
Knowledge and skills required for Network Administrators and Information Technology professionals to be aware of security vulnerabilities, to implement security measures, to analyze an existing network environment in consideration of known security threats or risks, to defend against attacks or viruses, and to ensure data privacy and integrity. Terminology and procedures for implementation and configuration of security, including access control, authorization, encryption, packet filters, firewalls, and Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).
CNIT 120: Network Security
http://samsclass.info/120/120_S09.shtml#lecture
Policy: http://samsclass.info/policy_use.htm
Many thanks to Sam Bowne for allowing to publish these presentations.
REMOVAL OF CERTIFICATES FROM SET PROTOCOL USING CERTIFICATELESS PUBLIC KEY CR...IJNSA Journal
Secure Electronic Transaction (SET) is a standard e-commerce protocol for securing credit card transactions over insecure networks. In a transaction using SET, all the members need public key certificates in order to authenticate their public key. Certificates are created by certificate authorities (CAs), The process of getting certificates from a certificate authority(CA) for any SET participants involves a large number of procedures like sending request to issue a certificates, getting approval or
rejection of request and finally obtain the certificates, which is essentially time consuming as because these are associated with certificate management, including renew, revocation ,storage and distribution and the computational cost of certificate verification, also the chain of verification can be quite long, depending on the certificate hierarchy. So, the issues associated with certificate management are quite complex and costly.The present paper attempts the removal of the certificates using the ‘certificateless public key cryptography (CL-PKC)’ . The basic idea of CL-PKC is to generate a public/private key pair for a user by using a master key of a Key Generation Center (KGC) with a random secret value selected by the user. Hence, CL-PKC eliminates the use of certificates in traditional PKC and solves the key escrow problem in ID-PKC.The comparison with existing SET implementation is also addressed in the paper that shows the effectiveness of the proposal.
Design an active verification mechanism for certificates revocation in OCSP f...IJECEIAES
No doubt that data security online is crucial. Therefore, great attention has been paid to that aspect by companies and organizations given its economic and social implications. Thus, online certificate status protocol (OCSP) is considered one of the most prominent protocol functioning in this field, which offers a prompt support for certificates online. In this research, a model designed based on field programable gate array (FPGA) using Merkel’s tree has been proposed to overcome the delay that might have occurred in sorting and authentication of certificates. Having adopted this model and with the assistance of Hash function algorithm, more than 50% of certificates have been processed in comparison with standard protocol. Moreover, certificates have been provided with substantial storage space with high throughput. Basically, Hash function algorithm has been designed to arrange and specify a site of verified or denied certificates within time of validity to protect servers from intrusion and clients from using applications with harmful contents.
Digital certificates provide advanced instruments for confirming identities in electronic environments. The application of digital certificates has been gaining global acceptance both in public and private sectors. In fact, the government field has witnessed increasing adoption of cryptographic technologies to address identity management requirements in cyberspace. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of various governmental scenarios on the usage and application of digital certificates in the United Arab Emirates. The UAE government integrated public key infrastructure (PKI) technology into its identity management infrastructure since 2003. The article also explores the UAE digital identity issuing authority's position regarding government-to-government transactions and the prospective role of digital certificates.
Digital signature and certificate authorityKrutiShah114
This presentation will give you a broad view about digital signature and certificate authority. It also explains the difference between digital signature and electronic signature.
Cost effective authentic and anonymous data sharing with forward securityLeMeniz Infotech
Cost effective authentic and anonymous data sharing with forward security
Do Your Projects With Technology Experts
To Get this projects Call : 9566355386 / 99625 88976
Visit : www.lemenizinfotech.com / www.ieeemaster.com
Mail : projects@lemenizinfotech.com
This presentation contains the total understanging of Digital Certificate ,What is the need and what are the main types of Digital certificates available.
I would appreciate help with these 4 questions. Thank You.1) Expla.pdfJUSTSTYLISH3B2MOHALI
I would appreciate help with these 4 questions. Thank You.
1) Explain what the following are: root certificates, self-signed certificates. Describe how they
are used. Provide some examples of each explaining how they are used. You should be able to
find examples of each on your system by looking through various options available on your
browser.
2) Provide a listing of the fields associated with a certificate of your choosing. Use the X509
definition to match the general fields of a certificate with the certificate you choose to look at.
Describe each field.
3) Your manager is considering implementing a PKI infrastructure. They are considering using
RSA encryption technology for the central part of their infrastructure. You manager would like
to know some products or services that utilize RSA encryption technology. Provide three
examples and explain how they make use of the RSA encryption technology. Provide a few
original sentences describing each of your examples.
4) Compare the functionality offered by the RSA and Diffie-Hellman algorithms.
Solution
A Root SSL certificate could be a certificate issued by a trusty certificate authority (CA).In the
SSL system, anyone will generate a language key and sign a replacement certificate therewith
signature. However, that certificate isn\'t thought-about valid unless it\'s been directly or
indirectly signed by a trusty CA.A trusty certificate authority is Associate in Nursing entity that
has been entitled to verify that somebody is effectively World Health Organization it declares to
be. so as for this model to figure, all the participants on the sport should agree on a group of CA
that they trust. All operational systems and most of net browsers ship with a group of trusty
CAs.The SSL system is predicated on a model of trust relationship, conjointly known as “chain
of trust”. once a tool validates a certificate, it compares the certificate establishment with the list
of trusty CAs. If a match isn\'t found, the shopper can then check to check if the certificate of the
supplying CA was issued by a trusty CA, so on till the tip of the certificate chain. the highest of
the chain, the basis certificate, should be issued by a trusty Certificate Authority.
Self-signed certificates or certificates issued by a non-public CAs aren\'t appropriate to be used
with the overall public.A certificate serves two essential purpose distribute the public key and
verifying the individuality of the server so guests know they aren’t sending their information to
the wrong person. It can only properly verify the identity of the server when it is signed by a
trusted third party because any attacker can create a self-signed certificate and launch a man-in-
the-middle attack. If a user just accept a self-signed certificate, an attacker could drop on all the
traffic or try to set up an imitation server to phish additional information out of the user. Because
of this, you will approximately on no account want to use a self signe.
Explain the role of the certificate authority and registration autho.pdfashokarians
Explain the role of the certificate authority and registration authority in Public Key
Infrastructure.
Solution
A certificate authority (CA) that stores, issues and signs the digital certificates. It acts as the
root of trust and provides services that authenticate the identity of individuals, computers and
other entities.A CA issues digital certificates to entities and individuals after verifying their
identity. It signs these certificates using its private key; its public key is made available to all
interested parties in a self-signed CA certificate. CAs use this trusted root certificate to create a
\"chain of trust\" -- many root certificates are embedded in Web browsers so they have built-in
trust of those CAs. A registration authority(RA) which verifies the identity of entities requesting
their digital certificates to be stored at the CA. It is an authority in a network that verifies user
requests for a digital certificate and tells the certificate authority (CA) to issue it. RAs are part of
a public key infrastructure (PKI), a networked system that enables companies and users to
exchange information and money safely and securely. The digital certificate contains a public
key that is used to encrypt and decrypt messages and digital signatures..
Design an active verification mechanism for certificates revocation in OCSP f...IJECEIAES
No doubt that data security online is crucial. Therefore, great attention has been paid to that aspect by companies and organizations given its economic and social implications. Thus, online certificate status protocol (OCSP) is considered one of the most prominent protocol functioning in this field, which offers a prompt support for certificates online. In this research, a model designed based on field programable gate array (FPGA) using Merkel’s tree has been proposed to overcome the delay that might have occurred in sorting and authentication of certificates. Having adopted this model and with the assistance of Hash function algorithm, more than 50% of certificates have been processed in comparison with standard protocol. Moreover, certificates have been provided with substantial storage space with high throughput. Basically, Hash function algorithm has been designed to arrange and specify a site of verified or denied certificates within time of validity to protect servers from intrusion and clients from using applications with harmful contents.
Digital certificates provide advanced instruments for confirming identities in electronic environments. The application of digital certificates has been gaining global acceptance both in public and private sectors. In fact, the government field has witnessed increasing adoption of cryptographic technologies to address identity management requirements in cyberspace. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of various governmental scenarios on the usage and application of digital certificates in the United Arab Emirates. The UAE government integrated public key infrastructure (PKI) technology into its identity management infrastructure since 2003. The article also explores the UAE digital identity issuing authority's position regarding government-to-government transactions and the prospective role of digital certificates.
Digital signature and certificate authorityKrutiShah114
This presentation will give you a broad view about digital signature and certificate authority. It also explains the difference between digital signature and electronic signature.
Cost effective authentic and anonymous data sharing with forward securityLeMeniz Infotech
Cost effective authentic and anonymous data sharing with forward security
Do Your Projects With Technology Experts
To Get this projects Call : 9566355386 / 99625 88976
Visit : www.lemenizinfotech.com / www.ieeemaster.com
Mail : projects@lemenizinfotech.com
This presentation contains the total understanging of Digital Certificate ,What is the need and what are the main types of Digital certificates available.
I would appreciate help with these 4 questions. Thank You.1) Expla.pdfJUSTSTYLISH3B2MOHALI
I would appreciate help with these 4 questions. Thank You.
1) Explain what the following are: root certificates, self-signed certificates. Describe how they
are used. Provide some examples of each explaining how they are used. You should be able to
find examples of each on your system by looking through various options available on your
browser.
2) Provide a listing of the fields associated with a certificate of your choosing. Use the X509
definition to match the general fields of a certificate with the certificate you choose to look at.
Describe each field.
3) Your manager is considering implementing a PKI infrastructure. They are considering using
RSA encryption technology for the central part of their infrastructure. You manager would like
to know some products or services that utilize RSA encryption technology. Provide three
examples and explain how they make use of the RSA encryption technology. Provide a few
original sentences describing each of your examples.
4) Compare the functionality offered by the RSA and Diffie-Hellman algorithms.
Solution
A Root SSL certificate could be a certificate issued by a trusty certificate authority (CA).In the
SSL system, anyone will generate a language key and sign a replacement certificate therewith
signature. However, that certificate isn\'t thought-about valid unless it\'s been directly or
indirectly signed by a trusty CA.A trusty certificate authority is Associate in Nursing entity that
has been entitled to verify that somebody is effectively World Health Organization it declares to
be. so as for this model to figure, all the participants on the sport should agree on a group of CA
that they trust. All operational systems and most of net browsers ship with a group of trusty
CAs.The SSL system is predicated on a model of trust relationship, conjointly known as “chain
of trust”. once a tool validates a certificate, it compares the certificate establishment with the list
of trusty CAs. If a match isn\'t found, the shopper can then check to check if the certificate of the
supplying CA was issued by a trusty CA, so on till the tip of the certificate chain. the highest of
the chain, the basis certificate, should be issued by a trusty Certificate Authority.
Self-signed certificates or certificates issued by a non-public CAs aren\'t appropriate to be used
with the overall public.A certificate serves two essential purpose distribute the public key and
verifying the individuality of the server so guests know they aren’t sending their information to
the wrong person. It can only properly verify the identity of the server when it is signed by a
trusted third party because any attacker can create a self-signed certificate and launch a man-in-
the-middle attack. If a user just accept a self-signed certificate, an attacker could drop on all the
traffic or try to set up an imitation server to phish additional information out of the user. Because
of this, you will approximately on no account want to use a self signe.
Explain the role of the certificate authority and registration autho.pdfashokarians
Explain the role of the certificate authority and registration authority in Public Key
Infrastructure.
Solution
A certificate authority (CA) that stores, issues and signs the digital certificates. It acts as the
root of trust and provides services that authenticate the identity of individuals, computers and
other entities.A CA issues digital certificates to entities and individuals after verifying their
identity. It signs these certificates using its private key; its public key is made available to all
interested parties in a self-signed CA certificate. CAs use this trusted root certificate to create a
\"chain of trust\" -- many root certificates are embedded in Web browsers so they have built-in
trust of those CAs. A registration authority(RA) which verifies the identity of entities requesting
their digital certificates to be stored at the CA. It is an authority in a network that verifies user
requests for a digital certificate and tells the certificate authority (CA) to issue it. RAs are part of
a public key infrastructure (PKI), a networked system that enables companies and users to
exchange information and money safely and securely. The digital certificate contains a public
key that is used to encrypt and decrypt messages and digital signatures..
COMPARISON OF CERTIFICATE POLICIES FORMERGING PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURESDURIN...IJNSA Journal
The Public Key Infrastructure(PKI) provides facilities for data encryption, digital signature and time stamping. It is a system where different authorities verify and authenticate the validity of each participant with the use of digital certificates. A Certificate Policy (CP) is a named set of rules and it indicates the applicability of a certificate in a Public Key Infrastructure. Sometimes two companies or organizations with different PKIs merge. Therefore it would be necessary that their PKIs are also able to merge. Sometimes, the unification of different PKIs is not possible because of the different certificate policies. This paper presents a method to compare and assess certificate policies during merger and acquisition of companies.
Define PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) and list and discuss the type.pdfxlynettalampleyxc
Define PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) and list and discuss the types of protection that it offers.
Give an example of where PKI is utilized in daily activity,(industry).
Solution
Answer:-
PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) :
Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) is a popular encryption and authentication approach used by
both small businesses and large enterprises.
What Is Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) :
The PKI environment is made up of five components:
1) Certification Authority (CA) -- serves as the root of trust that authenticates the identity of
individuals, computers and other entities in the network.
2) Registration Authority (RA) : -- is certified by a root CA to issue certificates for uses
permitted by the CA. In a Microsoft PKI environment, the RA is normally called a subordinate
CA.
3) Certificate Database : -- saves certificate requests issued and revoked certificates from the RA
or CA.
4) Certificate Store :-- saves issued certificates and pending or rejected certificate requests from
the local computer.
5) Key Archival Server :-- saves encrypted private keys in a certificate database for disaster
recovery purposes in case the Certificate Database is lost.
6) PKI is a very effective method for implementing multi-factor authentication. Some
companies, such as Unisys, require that devices that are attached to the corporate network must
be able to use PKI for the encrypted and authenticated exchange of information.
7) In cryptography, a PKI is an arrangement that binds public keys with respective identities of
entities (like persons and organizations).
8) A public key infrastructure (PKI) is a system for the creation, storage, and distribution of
digital certificates which are used to verify that a particular public key belongs to a certain entity.
Types Protection:
1) Encryption and/or sender authentication of e-mail messages .
2) Encryption and/or authentication of documents .
3) Authentication of users to applications (e.g., smart card logon, client authentication with SSL).
There\'s experimental usage for digitally signed HTTP authentication in the Enigform and
mod_openpgp projects .
4) Bootstrapping secure communication protocols such as Internet key exchange (IKE) and SSL.
In both of these, initial set-up of a secure channel security association uses asymmetric key ,
public key methods, whereas actual communication uses faster symmetric key, secret key
methods.
5) Mobile signatures are electronic signatures that are created using a mobile device and rely on
signature or certification services in a location independent telecommunication environment..
Public Key Infrastructure, or PKI, is a system of digital certificates and cryptographic keys that are used to authenticate individuals and devices. PKI is essential for secure communications over the internet and is used in a variety of applications, such as email, file sharing, and VPNs.
Multifactor authenticationMultifactor authentication or MFA .docxgilpinleeanna
Multifactor authentication
Multifactor authentication or MFA is a security system that requires more than on method of authentication from independent categories of credentials to verify the user’s identity for a login or other transaction.
Multifactor authentication combines two or more independent credentials: what the user knows like a password, what the user has the security token and what the user is like biometric verification. The goal of multifactor authentication is to create a layer of defense and make it more difficult for an unauthorized person to access a some like a physical location, network or database, or a computing device. If one of the factor is compromised, an attacker still needs at least one more barrier to breach before successfully breaking into the target.
Multifactor authentication cont…
Typical MFA scenarios include:
Swiping a card and entering a PIN.
Logging into a website and being requested to enter an additional one-time password OTP that the website’s authentication server sends to the requester’s phone, email address, or any other form.
Downloading a VPN client with a valid digital certificate and logging into the VPN before being granted access to a network.
Swiping a card, scanning a fingerprint and answering a security question
Attaching a USB hardware token to a Desktop that generates a one-time passcode and using the one-time passcode to log into a VPN client.
RSA Token/Symantec VIP Access
RSA token or security token is a two-factor authentication technology that is used to protect network resources. The authentication is based on two factors. The two factors are first something you know like your password or pin and the second factor is something you have the authenticator (RSA Token). The code that RSA Token produces changes every 60 seconds as an added form of security.
Symantec VIP Access is a software that protects your online accounts and transactions. The VIP credential provides a dynamic security code that you can use in addition to your user name and password for safe and secure account access. The code that VIP Access produces changes every 30 seconds as an added form of security.
How RSA Token/VIP software work
The way RSA Token and the VIP software work is when a user attempts to access a protected resource, he or she is prompted for a unique code. The code is a combination of their user’s password or pin and the code that is displayed on the authenticator token or VIP application at the time of logging in.
The user ID and pass code are intercepted by the RSA Authentication Agent and presented to the RSA Authentication Manager software which validates the pass code. The RSA SecurID system computes what number the token is supposed to be showing at that moment in time, checks it against what the user entered, and makes the decision to allow or deny access. This is also the case with the VIP software.
Reference
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/rsa_secure_id.html
https://idprote ...
Introduction to Public Key InfrastructureTheo Gravity
Adonis Fung and I worked on a project where we defined and built PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) for our local development and deployed environments. I gave a talk to our engineers on how PKI works, covering encryption, signing, trust stores, and how the HTTPS handshake works.
Similar to 317c0cdb 81da-40f9-84f2-1c5fba2f4b2d (20)
Understanding Globus Data Transfers with NetSageGlobus
NetSage is an open privacy-aware network measurement, analysis, and visualization service designed to help end-users visualize and reason about large data transfers. NetSage traditionally has used a combination of passive measurements, including SNMP and flow data, as well as active measurements, mainly perfSONAR, to provide longitudinal network performance data visualization. It has been deployed by dozens of networks world wide, and is supported domestically by the Engagement and Performance Operations Center (EPOC), NSF #2328479. We have recently expanded the NetSage data sources to include logs for Globus data transfers, following the same privacy-preserving approach as for Flow data. Using the logs for the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) as an example, this talk will walk through several different example use cases that NetSage can answer, including: Who is using Globus to share data with my institution, and what kind of performance are they able to achieve? How many transfers has Globus supported for us? Which sites are we sharing the most data with, and how is that changing over time? How is my site using Globus to move data internally, and what kind of performance do we see for those transfers? What percentage of data transfers at my institution used Globus, and how did the overall data transfer performance compare to the Globus users?
Large Language Models and the End of ProgrammingMatt Welsh
Talk by Matt Welsh at Craft Conference 2024 on the impact that Large Language Models will have on the future of software development. In this talk, I discuss the ways in which LLMs will impact the software industry, from replacing human software developers with AI, to replacing conventional software with models that perform reasoning, computation, and problem-solving.
OpenFOAM solver for Helmholtz equation, helmholtzFoam / helmholtzBubbleFoamtakuyayamamoto1800
In this slide, we show the simulation example and the way to compile this solver.
In this solver, the Helmholtz equation can be solved by helmholtzFoam. Also, the Helmholtz equation with uniformly dispersed bubbles can be simulated by helmholtzBubbleFoam.
SOCRadar Research Team: Latest Activities of IntelBrokerSOCRadar
The European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) has suffered an alleged data breach after a notorious threat actor claimed to have exfiltrated data from its systems. Infamous data leaker IntelBroker posted on the even more infamous BreachForums hacking forum, saying that Europol suffered a data breach this month.
The alleged breach affected Europol agencies CCSE, EC3, Europol Platform for Experts, Law Enforcement Forum, and SIRIUS. Infiltration of these entities can disrupt ongoing investigations and compromise sensitive intelligence shared among international law enforcement agencies.
However, this is neither the first nor the last activity of IntekBroker. We have compiled for you what happened in the last few days. To track such hacker activities on dark web sources like hacker forums, private Telegram channels, and other hidden platforms where cyber threats often originate, you can check SOCRadar’s Dark Web News.
Stay Informed on Threat Actors’ Activity on the Dark Web with SOCRadar!
Globus Compute wth IRI Workflows - GlobusWorld 2024Globus
As part of the DOE Integrated Research Infrastructure (IRI) program, NERSC at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and ALCF at Argonne National Lab are working closely with General Atomics on accelerating the computing requirements of the DIII-D experiment. As part of the work the team is investigating ways to speedup the time to solution for many different parts of the DIII-D workflow including how they run jobs on HPC systems. One of these routes is looking at Globus Compute as a way to replace the current method for managing tasks and we describe a brief proof of concept showing how Globus Compute could help to schedule jobs and be a tool to connect compute at different facilities.
Cyaniclab : Software Development Agency Portfolio.pdfCyanic lab
CyanicLab, an offshore custom software development company based in Sweden,India, Finland, is your go-to partner for startup development and innovative web design solutions. Our expert team specializes in crafting cutting-edge software tailored to meet the unique needs of startups and established enterprises alike. From conceptualization to execution, we offer comprehensive services including web and mobile app development, UI/UX design, and ongoing software maintenance. Ready to elevate your business? Contact CyanicLab today and let us propel your vision to success with our top-notch IT solutions.
top nidhi software solution freedownloadvrstrong314
This presentation emphasizes the importance of data security and legal compliance for Nidhi companies in India. It highlights how online Nidhi software solutions, like Vector Nidhi Software, offer advanced features tailored to these needs. Key aspects include encryption, access controls, and audit trails to ensure data security. The software complies with regulatory guidelines from the MCA and RBI and adheres to Nidhi Rules, 2014. With customizable, user-friendly interfaces and real-time features, these Nidhi software solutions enhance efficiency, support growth, and provide exceptional member services. The presentation concludes with contact information for further inquiries.
Top Features to Include in Your Winzo Clone App for Business Growth (4).pptxrickgrimesss22
Discover the essential features to incorporate in your Winzo clone app to boost business growth, enhance user engagement, and drive revenue. Learn how to create a compelling gaming experience that stands out in the competitive market.
Paketo Buildpacks : la meilleure façon de construire des images OCI? DevopsDa...Anthony Dahanne
Les Buildpacks existent depuis plus de 10 ans ! D’abord, ils étaient utilisés pour détecter et construire une application avant de la déployer sur certains PaaS. Ensuite, nous avons pu créer des images Docker (OCI) avec leur dernière génération, les Cloud Native Buildpacks (CNCF en incubation). Sont-ils une bonne alternative au Dockerfile ? Que sont les buildpacks Paketo ? Quelles communautés les soutiennent et comment ?
Venez le découvrir lors de cette session ignite
Into the Box Keynote Day 2: Unveiling amazing updates and announcements for modern CFML developers! Get ready for exciting releases and updates on Ortus tools and products. Stay tuned for cutting-edge innovations designed to boost your productivity.
First Steps with Globus Compute Multi-User EndpointsGlobus
In this presentation we will share our experiences around getting started with the Globus Compute multi-user endpoint. Working with the Pharmacology group at the University of Auckland, we have previously written an application using Globus Compute that can offload computationally expensive steps in the researcher's workflows, which they wish to manage from their familiar Windows environments, onto the NeSI (New Zealand eScience Infrastructure) cluster. Some of the challenges we have encountered were that each researcher had to set up and manage their own single-user globus compute endpoint and that the workloads had varying resource requirements (CPUs, memory and wall time) between different runs. We hope that the multi-user endpoint will help to address these challenges and share an update on our progress here.
TROUBLESHOOTING 9 TYPES OF OUTOFMEMORYERRORTier1 app
Even though at surface level ‘java.lang.OutOfMemoryError’ appears as one single error; underlyingly there are 9 types of OutOfMemoryError. Each type of OutOfMemoryError has different causes, diagnosis approaches and solutions. This session equips you with the knowledge, tools, and techniques needed to troubleshoot and conquer OutOfMemoryError in all its forms, ensuring smoother, more efficient Java applications.
Exploring Innovations in Data Repository Solutions - Insights from the U.S. G...Globus
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has made substantial investments in meeting evolving scientific, technical, and policy driven demands on storing, managing, and delivering data. As these demands continue to grow in complexity and scale, the USGS must continue to explore innovative solutions to improve its management, curation, sharing, delivering, and preservation approaches for large-scale research data. Supporting these needs, the USGS has partnered with the University of Chicago-Globus to research and develop advanced repository components and workflows leveraging its current investment in Globus. The primary outcome of this partnership includes the development of a prototype enterprise repository, driven by USGS Data Release requirements, through exploration and implementation of the entire suite of the Globus platform offerings, including Globus Flow, Globus Auth, Globus Transfer, and Globus Search. This presentation will provide insights into this research partnership, introduce the unique requirements and challenges being addressed and provide relevant project progress.
Innovating Inference - Remote Triggering of Large Language Models on HPC Clus...Globus
Large Language Models (LLMs) are currently the center of attention in the tech world, particularly for their potential to advance research. In this presentation, we'll explore a straightforward and effective method for quickly initiating inference runs on supercomputers using the vLLM tool with Globus Compute, specifically on the Polaris system at ALCF. We'll begin by briefly discussing the popularity and applications of LLMs in various fields. Following this, we will introduce the vLLM tool, and explain how it integrates with Globus Compute to efficiently manage LLM operations on Polaris. Attendees will learn the practical aspects of setting up and remotely triggering LLMs from local machines, focusing on ease of use and efficiency. This talk is ideal for researchers and practitioners looking to leverage the power of LLMs in their work, offering a clear guide to harnessing supercomputing resources for quick and effective LLM inference.
Listen to the keynote address and hear about the latest developments from Rachana Ananthakrishnan and Ian Foster who review the updates to the Globus Platform and Service, and the relevance of Globus to the scientific community as an automation platform to accelerate scientific discovery.
Climate Science Flows: Enabling Petabyte-Scale Climate Analysis with the Eart...Globus
The Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) is a global network of data servers that archives and distributes the planet’s largest collection of Earth system model output for thousands of climate and environmental scientists worldwide. Many of these petabyte-scale data archives are located in proximity to large high-performance computing (HPC) or cloud computing resources, but the primary workflow for data users consists of transferring data, and applying computations on a different system. As a part of the ESGF 2.0 US project (funded by the United States Department of Energy Office of Science), we developed pre-defined data workflows, which can be run on-demand, capable of applying many data reduction and data analysis to the large ESGF data archives, transferring only the resultant analysis (ex. visualizations, smaller data files). In this talk, we will showcase a few of these workflows, highlighting how Globus Flows can be used for petabyte-scale climate analysis.
Climate Science Flows: Enabling Petabyte-Scale Climate Analysis with the Eart...
317c0cdb 81da-40f9-84f2-1c5fba2f4b2d
1. PKI ADMINISTRATION USING EJBCA AND OPENCA
By Ayesha Ishrath Ghori and Asra Parveen
George Mason University-Fall 2006
Abstract:
For secure exchange of information between two
entities, there’s a need for some private information
(key) to be shared. Even prior to the intended
communication, we need a separate, out-of-band secure
communication to occur. This requires an “introducer”
between the two entities, which had had no relationship
in the past.
The idea of having a key that can be revealed publicly
without compromising communications security, is the
basis of a PKI. The “PKI” provides for services like
encryption, digital signatures, data integrity, key
establishment, zero knowledge/ minimum knowledge
protocols.
This paper presents an analysis of majorly existing
Certificate Authorities, which can help people get to
know “what’s in.” People who are new to this entire
concept can be able to judge, based on the analysis of
secure communication.
This paper provides a comparative analysis between
two leading certificate Authorities EJBCA and OpenCA.
The OpenCA is a popular Linux based certificate
authority and EJBCA is a Enterprise JAVA based CA.
PKI:
In cryptography, a public key infrastructure (PKI)
is an arrangement that provides for trusted third party
vetting of, and vouching for, user identities. It also allows
binding of public keys to users. This is usually carried out
by software at a central location together with other
coordinated software at distributed locations. The public
keys are typically in certificates.A PKI (public key
infrastructure) enables users of a basically unsecure public
network such as the Internet to securely and privately
exchange data and money through the use of a public and a
private cryptographic key pair that is obtained and shared
through a trusted authority. The public key infrastructure
provides for a digital certificate that can identify an
individual or an organization and directory services that can
store and, when necessary, revoke the certificates.
General concepts
Certification Authority (CA):
A CA issues certificates to, and vouches for the
authenticity of entities. The level of trust you can assign to a
CA is individual, per CA, and depends on the CA’s policy
and practices statement.
Certificate revocation list (CRL):
A Certificate revocation list (CRL) is a list of
certificates (more accurately: their serial numbers) which
have been revoked, are no longer valid, and should not be
relied upon by any system user.
RootCA:
A RootCA has a self-signed certificate and is also
called Trusted Root. Verification of other certificates in the
PKI ends with the RootCAs self-signed certificate. Since the
RootCAs certificate is self-signed it must somehow be
configured as a trusted root with all clients in the PKI.
SubCA:
A subordinate CA, or SubCA for short, is a CA
whose certificate is signed by another CA that can be
another SubCA or a RootCA. Since the SubCAs certificate
is signed by another CA, it does not have to be configured
as a trusted root. It is part of a certificate chain that ends in
the RootCA.
Registration Authority (RA):
An RA is an administrative function that registers
entities in the PKI. The RA is trusted to identify and
authenticate entities according to the CAs policy. There can
be one or more RAs connected to each CA in the PKI.
End-entity:
An end-entity is a user, such as an e-mail client, a web
server, a web browser or a VPN-gateway. End-entities are
not allowed to issue certificates to other entities; they make
up the leaf nodes in the PKI.
2. Hierarchical PKI:
As part of our project, we have implemented the following
hierarchical PKI using two open source PKI
Implementations, EJBCA and OpenCA.
Digital Certificates:
A digital certificate is an electronic means of
establishing your credentials when doing business or other
transactions on the Web. It is issued by a certification
authority (CA). User’s distinguished name, User’s public
key, User’s Credentials, Serial number, Issuer name,
Expiration date, copy of the certificate holder’s public key
(used for encrypting and decrypting messages and digital
signatures), and the digital signature of the certificate –
issuing authority so that a recipient can verify that the
certificate is real.
Digital signature which meets ITU (International
Telecommunication Union) Telecommunication
Standardization (ITU-T) PKIX X.509 version 3 [RFC 2459]
standard is generated based on
• Detailed information about the key holder.
• An expiration date, after which the certificate is
placed on the CA’s CRL(Certificate Revocation
Lit)
The operating system stores a certificate locally on
the computer or device that requested it or, in the case of a
user, on the computer or device that the user used to request
it. The storage location is called the certificate store. A
certificate store will often have numerous certificates,
possibly issued from a number of different certification
authorities.
How digital Certificates Are Structured:
For a digital certificate to be useful, it has to be structured
in an understandable and reliable way so that the
information within the certificate can be easily retrieved and
understood. For example, passport follows a similar
structure allowing people to easily understand the
information in a type of passport that they may never have
seen before. In the same way, as long as digital certificates
are standardized, they can be read and understood regardless
of who issued the certificate.
The EJBCA and OpenCA standards specify that digital
certificates used for them conform to the International
Telecommunications Union (ITU) X.509 standard. Because
both the CA’s rely on an established, recognized standard
for the structure of digital certificates, thus increases their
acceptance.
The X.509 standard specifies that digital certificates
contain standardized information. Specifically, X.509
version 3 certificates contain the following fields:
Version number The version o the X.509 standard to
which the certificate conforms.
Serial number A number that uniquely identifies the
certificate and is issued by the certification authority.
Certificate algorithm identifier The names of the
specific public key algorithms that the certification authority
has used to sign the digital certificate.
Issuers name The identity of certification authority who
actually issued the certificate.
Validity period The period of time for which a digital
certificate is valid and contains both a start date and an
expiration date.
Subject name The name of the owner of the digital
certificate.
Subject public key information The public key that is
associated with the owner of the digital certificate and the
specific public key algorithms associated with the public
key.
Issuer unique identifier Information that can be used to
uniquely identify the issuer of the digital certificate.
Subject unique identifier Information that can be used
to uniquely identify the owner of the that certificate.
Extensions Additional information that is related to the
use and handling of certificate.
Certification authority’s digital signature The actual
digital signature made with the certification authority’s
private key using the algorithm specified in the certificate
algorithm identifier field.
GMU CA
TOP CA
GMU
FAIRFAX
CA
SUBCA
GMU
MANASSA
S CA
SUBCA
GMU PW
CAMPUS
CA
SUBCA
RA INSTANCE
GMU
FAIRFAX
RA INSTANCE
GMU
MANASSAS
RA INSTANCE
GMU PW
CAMPUS
GMU Fairfax
CA
Administrator
GMU
Manassas CA
Administrator
Super
Administrator
GMU Fairfax
RA
Administrator
GMU
Manassas RA
Administrator
GMU PW RA
Administrator
GMU PW CA
Administrator
3. EJBCA:
Introduction:
The Enterprise Java Beans (EJB) architecture is a
specification developed at Sun Microsystems. It describes a
component-based architecture that provides for the
development and deployment of distributed applications.
The EJB architecture makes enterprise applications scalable,
secure, and transactional. EJBCA is a fully functional
Certificate Authority built in Java. Based on J2EE
technology it constitutes a robust, high performance and
component based CA. Both flexible and platform
independent, EJBCA can be used standalone or integrated in
any J2EE application. Enterprise JavaBeans are components
that execute within an “EJB container,” under the
supervision of an application server (JBOSS). The
application server and EJB container provide system
services for EJB’s, such as data persistence, transactions,
security, and resource management. The EJB container
maintains pools of database connections, as well as pools of
EJB instances that can be assigned to clients as needed. The
Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) is an industry-
standard suite of Java APIs for enterprise computing from
Sun Microsystems. It includes the Enterprise JavaBeans
architecture and a set of related packages that make
everything work together.
EJBCA specific concepts
Certificate Profile:
A certificate profile determines non uses specific content
and behavior of certificates. The largest part is extensions
and here you decide if a specific extension is present and
whether it is critical or not. Some extensions are populated
with a value, where it is the same value for all certificates
such as CRL Distribution Point. For other extensions only
the presence is determined, where the value is user- or cert-
specific such as Subject Alternative Name. Here is also
determined if these certificates will be published and with
which publisher.
Entity Profiles:
Entity profiles determine what data can or must be present
for users connected with this profile. Some values can also
be pre-determined such as the organization, O in the DN.
When adding a user in the PKI, the user must be connected
with an entity profile. The entity profile specifies one or
more certificate profiles used when generating certificates.
Publishers:
A publisher stores issued certificates to a central location.
EJBCA have implemented support for LDAP and Active
Directory but it's also possible to create customized plug-
ins.
Hard Token Profiles:
A hard token profile contains information like key length
used on cards, certificate profiles that should be used, and
templates for the visual graphics printed on the smartcard or
on a PIN/PUK letter.
Hard Token Issuers:
A hard token issuer represents a physical location running
Prime Card where hard tokens can be issued.
Architecture:
1) Data Tier:
The Data Tier stores the Certificates, CRLs as well as the
end users. EJBCA comes with a default database to store the
end users. The Certificates are stored in an LDAP repository
(Lightweight Directory Access Protocol).
2) CA Component:
The Certificate Authority component has the functionality to
create Root CAs, Sub CAs, Certificates, CRLs. It also
interfaces with the LDAP repository to store the Certificate
information.
4. 3) RA Component:
The Registration Authority component has the functionality
to create, delete and revoke the Users. It interfaces with the
Local database to store the User information.
4) Web Tier:
This is the interface using which the Clients interact with
the EJBCA system. It is typically a GUI where different
access levels dictate the scope of information a Client can
have access to.
5) Client:
The Client is an end-entity. An end-entity is a user, such as
an e-mail client, a web server, a web browser or a VPN-
gateway. End-entities are not allowed to issue certificates to
other entities; rather they make up the leaf nodes in the PKI.
Administration:
The Administration areas include:
• Create and Initialize the Super Administrator
• Creating and Configuring data sources
• Creating Publishers
• Creating Certificate Authorities
• Creating Registration Authorities
• Creating End Entities
• Creating CRLs
• Generating Certificates
Administration Tasks Accomplished:
1) Creating the EJBCA Super Admin Certificate:
2) EJBCA Administration
Interface:
3) Certificate Authorities Created:
5. 4) Administering a Certificate Authority:
5) Publisher for storing the Certificates in the LDAP
Format:
6) End Entities Created:
7) Certificates of the End Entity imported into the
Browser: