The document discusses why articles are accepted or rejected by refereed journals. It provides an overview of the peer review process for CALL-EJ, an online journal for computer-assisted language learning. Articles are accepted if they deal with emerging themes, are original, have a clear structure, use relevant references, and demonstrate methodological rigor. Articles are typically rejected if they fail technical requirements, are outside the journal's scope, are incomplete, or have flawed data analysis. The document recommends choosing the right journal, following guidelines, avoiding plagiarism, focusing on significant findings, and addressing ethics to avoid rejection.