This document summarizes a presentation given by Kazunori Nozawa on publishing in scholarly journals. Nozawa discusses what constitutes a scholarly publication and peer-reviewed journal. He provides an overview of the Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ) publication process, including manuscript preparation, internal and external reviews, revisions, and final publication. Common reasons for manuscript rejection include issues with language, methodology, formatting, and literature reviews. Nozawa provides recommendations for authors to avoid rejection, such as thoroughly reviewing submission guidelines and checking for grammar, plagiarism, and adherence to publication standards.
The document discusses why articles are accepted or rejected by refereed journals. It provides an overview of the peer review process for CALL-EJ, an online journal for computer-assisted language learning. Articles are accepted if they deal with emerging themes, are original, have a clear structure, use relevant references, and demonstrate methodological rigor. Articles are typically rejected if they fail technical requirements, are outside the journal's scope, are incomplete, or have flawed data analysis. The document recommends choosing the right journal, following guidelines, avoiding plagiarism, focusing on significant findings, and addressing ethics to avoid rejection.
This document provides an overview of the peer review process for publishing in refereed journals. It discusses what refereed journals are, including that they involve expert review of manuscripts before publication. It then focuses on the Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ) specifically, outlining its review process, typical timelines, reasons for acceptance/rejection, and recommendations for authors. Key steps include initial internal review, double-blind peer review, potential revisions and further review, with acceptance decisions typically within 2-7 months. The presentation aims to help authors successfully navigate the publication process.
The document provides guidance on writing articles for international journals. It discusses various aspects of writing such as titles, abstracts, introductions, methods, findings, discussions, and references. Common problems for Indonesian writers are identified, such as lack of literature reviews and demonstrating original contributions. The document provides tips for strong writing in each section and acknowledges sources to avoid plagiarism. Overall, the document aims to help authors prepare more publishable manuscripts for international peer-reviewed journals.
Tata kelola jurnal menuju akreditasi sinta 2Faisal Pak
The document discusses the accreditation of the REGISTER JOURNAL published by IAIN Salatiga, Indonesia. Some key points:
- The journal received accreditation at the level of SINTA 2 (Level 2) from the Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education in October 2018.
- SINTA 2 accreditation recognizes REGISTER JOURNAL as having excellent quality in management and publication based on several aspects like author guidelines, template consistency, publication ethics, and citations.
- The document outlines some of the journal's policies and processes to maintain quality, including peer review guidelines, writing format requirements, managing the roles of editors and reviewers, and adher
Tata kelola jurnal menuju akreditasi sinta 2 copyFaisal Pak
REGISTER JOURNAL was published by IAIN Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia and had been accredited PERINGKAT 2 or SINTA 2 at 24th October 2018 by Indonesia Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (RistekDikti) of The Republic of Indonesia as an achievement for the peer reviewed journal which has excellent quality in management and publication. The recognition published in Director Decree (SK No. 30/E/KPT/2018) and effective until 2021.
This journal had also been successfully indexed at CLARIVATE ANALYTICS , Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) of Web of Science Master Journal List at June 2019 and ACI (ASEAN CITATION INDEX) at April 2019 .
How to write an effective research paperOsama Yousaf
This document provides guidance on how to write an effective research paper. It discusses getting ready with data by organizing results and figures. For the first draft, it recommends identifying key findings and noting good writing styles. Regarding structure, it outlines sections like introduction, results, and conclusions. It also offers tips for selecting a journal, submitting the paper, and responding to reviewer feedback and revisions. The overall message is that authors should clearly communicate their findings, follow journal guidelines, and address reviewer comments to strengthen their manuscript.
Journal editors and peer reviewers represent the ultimate gatekeepers in the publication of high-quality scholarly works. Yet, for authors with English as a second language who are trying to get their research published in SCI-indexed, high-impact, English-language journals, there are many hurdles related to the basic structure of the manuscript that confront them. Journal editors are becoming burdened with an ever-increasing number of manuscript submissions from non-English speaking authors, worldwide. Reviewers do not wish to be burdened with papers that are poorly crafted. A good author’s editor, while working on behalf of the author, really manages the best interests of all stakeholders in balance (author, editor, peer reviewer). This presentation will explore these dynamics and highlight the value of various forms of editorial review prior to manuscript submission.
Editores de periódicos e revisores por pares representam os guardiões supremos na publicação de trabalhos científicos de alta qualidade. No entanto, para autores com o inglês como segunda língua, que estão tentando publicar nos periódicos indexados no Science Citation Index (SCI), de grande impacto, em língua inglesa, enfrentam muitas dificuldades relativas à estrutura básica do manuscrito. Os editores de periódicos estão ficando sobrecarregados com uma quantidade cada vez maior de submissões de manuscritos de autores não falantes de inglês, no mundo todo. Os revisores não gostam de ser encarregados de artigos mal-elaborados. Um bom editor, enquanto trabalha em benefício do autor, na verdade, conduz no melhor interesse de todos os envolvidos (autor, editor, revisor por pares). Esta apresentação explorará essas dinâmicas e realçará o valor de várias formas de revisão editorial anteriores à submissão do manuscrito.
Los editores de revistas y revisores representan los guardianes últimos en la publicación de trabajos académicos de alta calidad. Sin embargo, para los autores en que el inglés es su segunda lengua, que están tratando de conseguir que su investigación sea publicada en revistas indexadas en SCI, de alto impacto, en inglés, hay muchos obstáculos que enfrentan relacionados con la estructura básica del manuscrito. Los editores de revistas están siendo sobrecargados con un número cada vez mayor de comunicaciones manuscritas de autores de habla no inglesa, en todo el mundo. Los revisores no quieren hacerse cargo de trabajos que están mal diseñados. Un buen editor de autor, al mismo tiempo que trabaja en beneficio del autor, realmente gestiona los mejores intereses de todas las partes interesadas en equilibrio (autor, editor, revisor). Esta presentación explorará esta dinámica y pondrá de relieve el valor de distintas formas de revisión editorial antes de la presentación de manuscritos.
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
The document discusses why articles are accepted or rejected by refereed journals. It provides an overview of the peer review process for CALL-EJ, an online journal for computer-assisted language learning. Articles are accepted if they deal with emerging themes, are original, have a clear structure, use relevant references, and demonstrate methodological rigor. Articles are typically rejected if they fail technical requirements, are outside the journal's scope, are incomplete, or have flawed data analysis. The document recommends choosing the right journal, following guidelines, avoiding plagiarism, focusing on significant findings, and addressing ethics to avoid rejection.
This document provides an overview of the peer review process for publishing in refereed journals. It discusses what refereed journals are, including that they involve expert review of manuscripts before publication. It then focuses on the Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ) specifically, outlining its review process, typical timelines, reasons for acceptance/rejection, and recommendations for authors. Key steps include initial internal review, double-blind peer review, potential revisions and further review, with acceptance decisions typically within 2-7 months. The presentation aims to help authors successfully navigate the publication process.
The document provides guidance on writing articles for international journals. It discusses various aspects of writing such as titles, abstracts, introductions, methods, findings, discussions, and references. Common problems for Indonesian writers are identified, such as lack of literature reviews and demonstrating original contributions. The document provides tips for strong writing in each section and acknowledges sources to avoid plagiarism. Overall, the document aims to help authors prepare more publishable manuscripts for international peer-reviewed journals.
Tata kelola jurnal menuju akreditasi sinta 2Faisal Pak
The document discusses the accreditation of the REGISTER JOURNAL published by IAIN Salatiga, Indonesia. Some key points:
- The journal received accreditation at the level of SINTA 2 (Level 2) from the Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education in October 2018.
- SINTA 2 accreditation recognizes REGISTER JOURNAL as having excellent quality in management and publication based on several aspects like author guidelines, template consistency, publication ethics, and citations.
- The document outlines some of the journal's policies and processes to maintain quality, including peer review guidelines, writing format requirements, managing the roles of editors and reviewers, and adher
Tata kelola jurnal menuju akreditasi sinta 2 copyFaisal Pak
REGISTER JOURNAL was published by IAIN Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia and had been accredited PERINGKAT 2 or SINTA 2 at 24th October 2018 by Indonesia Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (RistekDikti) of The Republic of Indonesia as an achievement for the peer reviewed journal which has excellent quality in management and publication. The recognition published in Director Decree (SK No. 30/E/KPT/2018) and effective until 2021.
This journal had also been successfully indexed at CLARIVATE ANALYTICS , Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) of Web of Science Master Journal List at June 2019 and ACI (ASEAN CITATION INDEX) at April 2019 .
How to write an effective research paperOsama Yousaf
This document provides guidance on how to write an effective research paper. It discusses getting ready with data by organizing results and figures. For the first draft, it recommends identifying key findings and noting good writing styles. Regarding structure, it outlines sections like introduction, results, and conclusions. It also offers tips for selecting a journal, submitting the paper, and responding to reviewer feedback and revisions. The overall message is that authors should clearly communicate their findings, follow journal guidelines, and address reviewer comments to strengthen their manuscript.
Journal editors and peer reviewers represent the ultimate gatekeepers in the publication of high-quality scholarly works. Yet, for authors with English as a second language who are trying to get their research published in SCI-indexed, high-impact, English-language journals, there are many hurdles related to the basic structure of the manuscript that confront them. Journal editors are becoming burdened with an ever-increasing number of manuscript submissions from non-English speaking authors, worldwide. Reviewers do not wish to be burdened with papers that are poorly crafted. A good author’s editor, while working on behalf of the author, really manages the best interests of all stakeholders in balance (author, editor, peer reviewer). This presentation will explore these dynamics and highlight the value of various forms of editorial review prior to manuscript submission.
Editores de periódicos e revisores por pares representam os guardiões supremos na publicação de trabalhos científicos de alta qualidade. No entanto, para autores com o inglês como segunda língua, que estão tentando publicar nos periódicos indexados no Science Citation Index (SCI), de grande impacto, em língua inglesa, enfrentam muitas dificuldades relativas à estrutura básica do manuscrito. Os editores de periódicos estão ficando sobrecarregados com uma quantidade cada vez maior de submissões de manuscritos de autores não falantes de inglês, no mundo todo. Os revisores não gostam de ser encarregados de artigos mal-elaborados. Um bom editor, enquanto trabalha em benefício do autor, na verdade, conduz no melhor interesse de todos os envolvidos (autor, editor, revisor por pares). Esta apresentação explorará essas dinâmicas e realçará o valor de várias formas de revisão editorial anteriores à submissão do manuscrito.
Los editores de revistas y revisores representan los guardianes últimos en la publicación de trabajos académicos de alta calidad. Sin embargo, para los autores en que el inglés es su segunda lengua, que están tratando de conseguir que su investigación sea publicada en revistas indexadas en SCI, de alto impacto, en inglés, hay muchos obstáculos que enfrentan relacionados con la estructura básica del manuscrito. Los editores de revistas están siendo sobrecargados con un número cada vez mayor de comunicaciones manuscritas de autores de habla no inglesa, en todo el mundo. Los revisores no quieren hacerse cargo de trabajos que están mal diseñados. Un buen editor de autor, al mismo tiempo que trabaja en beneficio del autor, realmente gestiona los mejores intereses de todas las partes interesadas en equilibrio (autor, editor, revisor). Esta presentación explorará esta dinámica y pondrá de relieve el valor de distintas formas de revisión editorial antes de la presentación de manuscritos.
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
How to write a research paper for an international peerreviewed journalvijay kumar
This PowerPoint is on writing a research article for an International Peer-reviewed Journal. The talk was delivered at an International Virtual workshop. All videos related to research conferences can be viewed at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEUKBUIaQG3wr05Sj38oDA/featured
In October 2013, Donald Samulack, President, U.S. operations at Editage, attended the SciELO 15 Years Conference held to celebrate the 15th anniversary of the SciELO Network. The primary focus of the conference was on open access publishing and the challenges currently faced by journals. The panel of speakers at the conference included Donald Samulack.
Donald presented an interesting session titled Can an Author’s Editor Help Expedite Peer Review of the Manuscript They Edit? as part of the panel on “Experiences, Solutions, Products, and Services of Scientific Communication.” Editage was one of the sponsors of the event, which was held from October 22-25 at the Intercontinental Hotel in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The conference attracted a daily visitors as 400 academicians, including editors, publishers, researchers, and authors.
This document provides guidance and options for the stage-mémoire tutorat mixte project. Students can choose from several project options, including conducting an action research study by replicating a journal article, applying CLIL principles to design a teaching unit, collaborating on a politeness research study, or participating in a videoconferencing project. The document also outlines course activities for journal article analysis, classroom activity analysis, learner language analysis, and participation in professional networks.
The document provides guidance for writing a journal article review. It begins by defining what a journal article is and explains that a review asks the reader to evaluate an article beyond just summarizing it. The document then lists detailed questions to guide the evaluation of an article's purpose and argument, organization of information, methods, and data. It provides an example of a sample journal article review, which includes an annotated bibliography, summary, and actual review. Finally, it provides instructions for a student's first quarter exam, which involves choosing a journal article to review based on their research group's approved topic.
This document provides an overview of conducting a literature review. It defines what constitutes literature and a literature review, and explains that a literature review surveys previous research on a topic to help identify gaps and avoid duplicating work. The document outlines the major steps in conducting a literature review, including searching relevant sources, analyzing and synthesizing the information found, and structuring the literature review. It also discusses citation styles and plagiarism guidelines.
Scientific paper writing ppt shalini phdSHALINI BISHT
This document provides an overview of the key sections and considerations for writing a scientific research paper. It discusses selecting an appropriate title, writing an abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. It also addresses statistical analysis, citing references, authorship, and avoiding plagiarism. The goal is to guide researchers in organizing their ideas and findings into a coherent scientific paper format.
This document provides information about publishing academic papers in refereed journals. It discusses choosing an appropriate journal based on criteria like the journal's academic level and acceptance rate. The stages of publishing are outlined, including writing the article according to the journal's guidelines, getting peer reviews, responding to feedback, and final editing. Examples are given of national and international journals, including journals indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index. Guidelines and impact factors of some specific linguistics journals are also summarized.
This document provides guidance on how to write a scientific paper for publication in an international journal. It discusses selecting an appropriate journal, structuring the paper using the IMRAD format, and key elements of each section including the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions. Helpful tips are provided for writing each section clearly and effectively to share new scientific findings with the international community. The presenter is an expert in scientific publishing with experience reviewing papers for several international journals.
ENAM ASPEK PENTING DALAM TATA KELOLA JURNAL MENUJU AKREDITASI NASIONAL
1. Author Guidelines/Gaya Selingkung.
2. Penyediaan Template Artikel & Konsistensi
3. Diversity of Reviewers, Editors & Authors dan bukti unggahan di OJS Web
4. Publication Ethics sesuai dengan COPE
5. Jumlah Sitasi/Citedness di Google Scholar, Scopus dan WoS
6. Pastikan DOI-nya aktif, bukan Broken link.
Click here for download: https://zenodo.org/record/5831120#.Ydn1U1kxXIU
This document discusses key aspects of the scientific research process and publishing findings, including:
1) The typical phases of the scientific method such as developing a research question, conducting background research, forming a hypothesis, designing and conducting experiments, analyzing results, and publishing findings.
2) Guidelines for publishing research including selecting appropriate publication venues based on their prestige, impact factor, and indexing in databases. Conferences, journals, books, and dissertation are discussed as common publication types.
3) Metrics for measuring research impact including the number of citations, journal impact factor, and h-index which provides an indicator of productivity and citation impact. Resources for identifying publications and metrics like Web of Science, DBLP, and Google
Literature Review - How to write effectively.pptxnguyenlekhanhx02
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing and synthesizing existing works to place the current study in context, avoid duplication, and identify gaps. An effective literature review compares and contrasts authors' views, groups similar conclusions, and critically evaluates methodologies. It should highlight exemplary studies, identify patterns, and show how the current study relates to prior work. When searching literature, one should use a variety of sources and evaluate their credibility. The conclusion should draw key points and discuss the need for further research.
These slides are related to our last event at the Sapienza University of Rome for the graduate students. Please follow our website: https://www.facebook.com/psa.sapienza
This document outlines the standard structure for a scientific research paper, which generally consists of three main parts: an introduction, body, and conclusion. The introduction provides background on the topic and states the purpose of the study. The body includes a literature review, methodology, results, and discussion sections. The conclusion summarizes key findings and implications. While the title and abstract are presented first, they are usually written last to succinctly describe the overall paper. Following a consistent structure helps provide organization and credibility to the research.
This is a presentation as a keynote speaker at the 3rd. International Postgraduate Colloquium held on Thursday 13 October 2016 at the School of Languages, Literacies and Translation at Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). The presentation content and conclusions drawn are based on the qualitative analysis of the sampling provided herein and based on my humble experience as a research proposal assessor and chairperson, reviewer, and supervisor since I have become a USM academic staff member in June 2011.
This document provides guidance on how to write an effective research paper. It discusses gathering data, structuring the paper, selecting a journal for submission, and the submission and revision process. The key sections of a research paper are outlined, including the introduction, methods, results and discussion, and conclusions. Tips are provided on writing titles, abstracts, and each section of the paper. The goal is to present findings in a clear, logical manner for readers in the chosen journal's field.
This document provides guidance on scientific writing and publishing papers in journals. It discusses the main steps in the publishing process from conducting research to writing drafts and revising papers. It emphasizes that publishing research is important to advancing scientific knowledge. It also addresses choosing appropriate journals, writing different sections of a paper, bibliometric indicators for measuring journal impact, and ethics in scientific writing.
This document outlines a bioethics unit plan for high school students. It includes:
- Reading and writing standards addressed
- Materials and resources used, including websites for content and activities
- A timeline that breaks the unit into weekly segments focusing on content, research, writing instruction, and the writing process
- Details about directing writing instruction, peer editing, and using rubrics to self-assess writing
- Possible obstacles students may face and solutions to address them
- A reference list of sources cited in the unit plan
This document provides guidance for students writing a paper and developing a digital summary component for a reading education seminar. It outlines the goals of developing in-depth knowledge on a reading topic and creating a practical digital resource. Students are instructed to analyze research articles on their topic and write a paper synthesizing the information. They are provided with tips for structuring the paper, citing sources, using headings, quotes and references. The document also provides guidance on designing an engaging digital summary component to share the key findings of their research with others.
This document provides a six step process for successful assignment planning: 1) Understand the assignment by reading instructions carefully and clarifying requirements, 2) Get organized by assessing readings and reserving resources, 3) Conduct research by developing keywords and search strategies to find relevant sources, 4) Evaluate sources using criteria like currency, relevance, and authority, 5) Take notes and make summaries in your own words to avoid plagiarism, 6) Create an outline and write the assignment by structuring it with an introduction, body, and conclusion. Following these steps can help students plan assignments effectively and meet deadlines.
This document provides guidelines for preparing research papers and practice papers for publication in the Journal of Research in Open, Distance and e-Learning (JRODeL). It outlines the typical sections of a research paper such as the introduction, literature review, methods, findings, discussion and conclusion. It describes what should be included in each section and provides questions for reviewers to consider. The document also provides guidance for writing up best practices, including describing the context, objectives, design, implementation, lessons learned and recommendations. The overall aim is to build a community of practice among researchers and practitioners in open, distance and e-learning.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
How to write a research paper for an international peerreviewed journalvijay kumar
This PowerPoint is on writing a research article for an International Peer-reviewed Journal. The talk was delivered at an International Virtual workshop. All videos related to research conferences can be viewed at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEUKBUIaQG3wr05Sj38oDA/featured
In October 2013, Donald Samulack, President, U.S. operations at Editage, attended the SciELO 15 Years Conference held to celebrate the 15th anniversary of the SciELO Network. The primary focus of the conference was on open access publishing and the challenges currently faced by journals. The panel of speakers at the conference included Donald Samulack.
Donald presented an interesting session titled Can an Author’s Editor Help Expedite Peer Review of the Manuscript They Edit? as part of the panel on “Experiences, Solutions, Products, and Services of Scientific Communication.” Editage was one of the sponsors of the event, which was held from October 22-25 at the Intercontinental Hotel in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The conference attracted a daily visitors as 400 academicians, including editors, publishers, researchers, and authors.
This document provides guidance and options for the stage-mémoire tutorat mixte project. Students can choose from several project options, including conducting an action research study by replicating a journal article, applying CLIL principles to design a teaching unit, collaborating on a politeness research study, or participating in a videoconferencing project. The document also outlines course activities for journal article analysis, classroom activity analysis, learner language analysis, and participation in professional networks.
The document provides guidance for writing a journal article review. It begins by defining what a journal article is and explains that a review asks the reader to evaluate an article beyond just summarizing it. The document then lists detailed questions to guide the evaluation of an article's purpose and argument, organization of information, methods, and data. It provides an example of a sample journal article review, which includes an annotated bibliography, summary, and actual review. Finally, it provides instructions for a student's first quarter exam, which involves choosing a journal article to review based on their research group's approved topic.
This document provides an overview of conducting a literature review. It defines what constitutes literature and a literature review, and explains that a literature review surveys previous research on a topic to help identify gaps and avoid duplicating work. The document outlines the major steps in conducting a literature review, including searching relevant sources, analyzing and synthesizing the information found, and structuring the literature review. It also discusses citation styles and plagiarism guidelines.
Scientific paper writing ppt shalini phdSHALINI BISHT
This document provides an overview of the key sections and considerations for writing a scientific research paper. It discusses selecting an appropriate title, writing an abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. It also addresses statistical analysis, citing references, authorship, and avoiding plagiarism. The goal is to guide researchers in organizing their ideas and findings into a coherent scientific paper format.
This document provides information about publishing academic papers in refereed journals. It discusses choosing an appropriate journal based on criteria like the journal's academic level and acceptance rate. The stages of publishing are outlined, including writing the article according to the journal's guidelines, getting peer reviews, responding to feedback, and final editing. Examples are given of national and international journals, including journals indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index. Guidelines and impact factors of some specific linguistics journals are also summarized.
This document provides guidance on how to write a scientific paper for publication in an international journal. It discusses selecting an appropriate journal, structuring the paper using the IMRAD format, and key elements of each section including the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions. Helpful tips are provided for writing each section clearly and effectively to share new scientific findings with the international community. The presenter is an expert in scientific publishing with experience reviewing papers for several international journals.
ENAM ASPEK PENTING DALAM TATA KELOLA JURNAL MENUJU AKREDITASI NASIONAL
1. Author Guidelines/Gaya Selingkung.
2. Penyediaan Template Artikel & Konsistensi
3. Diversity of Reviewers, Editors & Authors dan bukti unggahan di OJS Web
4. Publication Ethics sesuai dengan COPE
5. Jumlah Sitasi/Citedness di Google Scholar, Scopus dan WoS
6. Pastikan DOI-nya aktif, bukan Broken link.
Click here for download: https://zenodo.org/record/5831120#.Ydn1U1kxXIU
This document discusses key aspects of the scientific research process and publishing findings, including:
1) The typical phases of the scientific method such as developing a research question, conducting background research, forming a hypothesis, designing and conducting experiments, analyzing results, and publishing findings.
2) Guidelines for publishing research including selecting appropriate publication venues based on their prestige, impact factor, and indexing in databases. Conferences, journals, books, and dissertation are discussed as common publication types.
3) Metrics for measuring research impact including the number of citations, journal impact factor, and h-index which provides an indicator of productivity and citation impact. Resources for identifying publications and metrics like Web of Science, DBLP, and Google
Literature Review - How to write effectively.pptxnguyenlekhanhx02
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing and synthesizing existing works to place the current study in context, avoid duplication, and identify gaps. An effective literature review compares and contrasts authors' views, groups similar conclusions, and critically evaluates methodologies. It should highlight exemplary studies, identify patterns, and show how the current study relates to prior work. When searching literature, one should use a variety of sources and evaluate their credibility. The conclusion should draw key points and discuss the need for further research.
These slides are related to our last event at the Sapienza University of Rome for the graduate students. Please follow our website: https://www.facebook.com/psa.sapienza
This document outlines the standard structure for a scientific research paper, which generally consists of three main parts: an introduction, body, and conclusion. The introduction provides background on the topic and states the purpose of the study. The body includes a literature review, methodology, results, and discussion sections. The conclusion summarizes key findings and implications. While the title and abstract are presented first, they are usually written last to succinctly describe the overall paper. Following a consistent structure helps provide organization and credibility to the research.
This is a presentation as a keynote speaker at the 3rd. International Postgraduate Colloquium held on Thursday 13 October 2016 at the School of Languages, Literacies and Translation at Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). The presentation content and conclusions drawn are based on the qualitative analysis of the sampling provided herein and based on my humble experience as a research proposal assessor and chairperson, reviewer, and supervisor since I have become a USM academic staff member in June 2011.
This document provides guidance on how to write an effective research paper. It discusses gathering data, structuring the paper, selecting a journal for submission, and the submission and revision process. The key sections of a research paper are outlined, including the introduction, methods, results and discussion, and conclusions. Tips are provided on writing titles, abstracts, and each section of the paper. The goal is to present findings in a clear, logical manner for readers in the chosen journal's field.
This document provides guidance on scientific writing and publishing papers in journals. It discusses the main steps in the publishing process from conducting research to writing drafts and revising papers. It emphasizes that publishing research is important to advancing scientific knowledge. It also addresses choosing appropriate journals, writing different sections of a paper, bibliometric indicators for measuring journal impact, and ethics in scientific writing.
This document outlines a bioethics unit plan for high school students. It includes:
- Reading and writing standards addressed
- Materials and resources used, including websites for content and activities
- A timeline that breaks the unit into weekly segments focusing on content, research, writing instruction, and the writing process
- Details about directing writing instruction, peer editing, and using rubrics to self-assess writing
- Possible obstacles students may face and solutions to address them
- A reference list of sources cited in the unit plan
This document provides guidance for students writing a paper and developing a digital summary component for a reading education seminar. It outlines the goals of developing in-depth knowledge on a reading topic and creating a practical digital resource. Students are instructed to analyze research articles on their topic and write a paper synthesizing the information. They are provided with tips for structuring the paper, citing sources, using headings, quotes and references. The document also provides guidance on designing an engaging digital summary component to share the key findings of their research with others.
This document provides a six step process for successful assignment planning: 1) Understand the assignment by reading instructions carefully and clarifying requirements, 2) Get organized by assessing readings and reserving resources, 3) Conduct research by developing keywords and search strategies to find relevant sources, 4) Evaluate sources using criteria like currency, relevance, and authority, 5) Take notes and make summaries in your own words to avoid plagiarism, 6) Create an outline and write the assignment by structuring it with an introduction, body, and conclusion. Following these steps can help students plan assignments effectively and meet deadlines.
This document provides guidelines for preparing research papers and practice papers for publication in the Journal of Research in Open, Distance and e-Learning (JRODeL). It outlines the typical sections of a research paper such as the introduction, literature review, methods, findings, discussion and conclusion. It describes what should be included in each section and provides questions for reviewers to consider. The document also provides guidance for writing up best practices, including describing the context, objectives, design, implementation, lessons learned and recommendations. The overall aim is to build a community of practice among researchers and practitioners in open, distance and e-learning.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
20221020Workshop.pptx
1. CALL Issues for Scholarly
Publication: Perspectives
from an Editor
The 3rd International Conference on
English Language Teaching (ICON-ELT)
2022 Workshop
2022/10/18
Kazunori Nozawa
Professor Emeritus
Ritsumeikan University, Japan
nozawa@is.ritsumei.ac.jp
CALL-EJ Editor-in-Chief
http://callej.org/
2. Outline
● What is a Scholarly Publication?
● Overview of Computer Assisted Language Learning
Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ)
● Requirements for a manuscript preparation
● Internal and external reviews
● Revisions and formatting
● Publishing
● Conclusion and Recommendation
2
3. Halo!
I am Kazunori Nozawa.
● Professor Emeritus &
Part-time Lecturer, Ritsumeikan
University, Japan
● EFL, NVC, EduTech, ICC
● CALL-EJ Editor-in-Chief
You can find me more at
3
4. What is a Scholarly Journal?
A scholarly journal is also called:
• academic journals,
• scientific journals,
• peer-reviewed journals
5. What is a Scholarly Journal?
Nonprofit Organizations Research Guide
(n.d.)
A periodical that contains articles written
by experts in a particular field of study and
reports the results of research in that field.
6. What is a Scholarly Journal?
Simon Fraser University Library (n. d.):
• Articles are written by and for faculty, researchers or scholars
(chemists, historians, doctors, artists, etc.)
• Use scholarly or technical language
• Articles tend to be long and detailed, about research in a
particular academic discipline
• Include full citations for sources
• Are often refereed or peer-reviewed
• Include information about the authors
• Are published by academic organizations
• Note: book reviews and editorials are not considered scholarly
articles, even when found in scholarly journals
7. Study.com (n.d.). Peer Reviewed Scholarly
Journal: Definition & Examples (2’55”)
What is a Scholarly Journal?
8. “
A Refereed Journal: Definitions
8
CQU Library, Australia (n. d.): A refereed
journal contains articles that have been
through a peer review process
DifferenceBetween.com (2021): A peer-reviewed journal
refers to a scholarly journal evaluated by experts with
similar competencies. These experts can be the author’s
peers.
Angelo State University, U.S.A. (n. d.):
Articles are written by experts and are reviewed
by several other experts in the field before the
article is published in the journal in order to
ensure the article’s quality.
Virginia Tech University Library, U.S.A. (n.
d.): A refereed journal, or peer reviewed journal,
is a specific type of publication that meets the
high standards and rigor expected with
academic publishing. Refereed articles within
the journal have been reviewed by a blind
editorial panel for rigor in research and
appropriateness of conclusions.
Simon Fraser University, Canada (n. d.): Peer-reviewed
or refereed journals have an editorial board of subject
experts who review and evaluate submitted articles before
accepting them for publication. A journal may be a
scholarly journal but not a peer-reviewed journal.
9. Different Models (Wiley, n. d.)
9
Single
blind
Double
blind
Open Peer
review
Collaborative
Transparent
Peer
Review
Post
Publication
Author
doesn't
know the
identity of
the reviewer.
Reviewer
doesn't know
the identity
of the author,
and vice-
versa.
The identity
of the author
and the
reviewer is
known by all
participants,
during or
after the
review
process.
Review report
is posted with
the published
article.
Reviewer can
choose if they
want to share
their identity.
Two or
more
reviewers
work
together to
submit a
unified
report.
Review
solicited or
unsolicited, of a
published
paper. Does not
exclude other
forms of peer
review.
10. Scholarly Journals for Language
Education and Technology
• AsiaCALL Online Journal -
https://www.asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal
• CALICO Journal -
https://journals.equinoxpub.com/CALICO
• Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic
Journal - http://callej.org/
• Computer Assisted Language Learning -
https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/ncal20
• International Journal of Computer-Assisted
Language Learning and Teaching -
https://www.igi-global.com/journal/international-
journal-computer-assisted-language/41023
10
11. Scholarly Journals for Language Education
and Technology
• Journal of Foreign Language Education and
Technology - https://www.jflet.com/Language
• Language Learning & Technology -
https://www.lltjournal.org/
• Language Education & Technology -
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/let/-char/en
• ReCALL Journal - https://www.eurocall-
languages.org/publications/recall-journal
• The JALT CALL Journal -
https://www.castledown.com/journals/jaltcall/
11
13. CALL-EJ Timeline
Started
OnCALL in
Australia
and CALL
EJ (1996-
1999) in
Japan were
merged
together to
be CALL-EJ
Online
Indexed
• European
Reference
Index for the
Humanities
(ERIH).
• Scopus
• National Diet
Library (NDL)
• Web of
Science/Publ
ons
New Record
2020: 126
2021: 171
(2022: 100↑)
2020-22
2011-20
2010
1999
Name changed
CALL-EJ
Online was
renamed
to CALL-EJ.
14. CALL-EJ
Team (2022)
All volunteer-minded leading
professionals from the world
Editorial Board Reviewers
16 Members
Japan, Spain, Iran,
Malaysia, Thailand,
Indonesia, South
Korea, U.S.A.
20 Countries
East Asia, Southeast
Asia, Middle East,
Australia & NZ, USA,
UK
15.
16.
17.
18. Peer Review Process (CALL-EJ)
Revision and Resubmission
Double blinded Reviews
Internal Review by Editors and Revised &
Resubmission
APA7 Written Manuscript (Word)
Submission with a Plagiarism Check Report
(e.g., Turnitin)
>15%
Similarity
index
3rd Review
20. How long does it take to be
accepted or rejected? (CALL-EJ)
• The article has been accepted (the
shortest time in 2021-22): 2 months
• The article has been accepted (the
longest time in 2021): 7 months
• The article has been rejected (the
shortest time in 2022): 1 month
• The article has been rejected (the
longest time in 2021): 6 months
Often 3rd
review
happened
21. Eight reasons why articles are accepted
Hernando (2020, March)
1
2
3
4
the manuscript deals with some
emerging theme
must be original
abound in the importance of
metadata (title, abstract and
keywords)
the manuscript to be correctly
structured and written
22. Eight reasons why articles are accepted
5
6
7
8
the references are relevant
the importance of methodological
rigor and the adequacy of research
instruments
attached to the elaboration of
results, discussion and conclusions
abound in a series of “plus criteria”
such as research articles, etc.
23. Eight reasons why articles are rejected
Thrower (2012, September)
1
2
3
4
It fails the technical screening.
It does not fall within the Aims
and Scope.
It's incomplete.
The procedures and/or analysis of
the data is seen to be defective.
24. Eight reasons why articles are rejected
5
6
7
8
It's simply a small extension of a
different paper, often from the same
authors.
The conclusions cannot be justified
on the basis of the rest of the paper.
It's incomprehensible.
It's boring.
25. Problems Found
01
02
03
04
Language (English)
No spell and grammar
checked
Methodology
Single method (only a
questionnaire and results),
lack of collected data,
treatment and length, etc.
Paper Format
Without reading of the
submission guidelines (pdf
vs Word, letter vs A4, Right
to Left writing, No
plagiarism report, etc.).
Literature Review
Outdated or lack of latest
references, inaccurate in-text
citations, not in APA7 referencing,
plagiarism issue, etc. .
28. Why were Indonesian Manuscripts Rejected?
• The manuscript does not fit in the journal since the main
topic is not technology in language learning/teaching.
• The manuscript has some weaknesses that require
significant improvement, even though it is a well-
organized one.
• There were major issues related to grammar and word
choice throughout the paper. In some cases, these issues
made it unclear what the authors were trying to
communicate.
• The manuscript was poorly written, the abstract was
unclear, and the methodology was not described clearly.
Neither the research nor the literature review is related
to language learning.
Purpose,
Methodology,
Main findings,
Implications,
Novelty
29. Why were Indonesian Manuscripts Rejected?
• The title warrants a more qualitative rich analysis.
Although a mixed methodology is used, the data
discussed is mainly on statistics.
• The references, except for a few are rather outdated.
• The manuscript is not well written as an academic paper
with so many basic issues in English while the literature
review is outdated.
30. Why were Indonesian Manuscripts Rejected?
• The experiment was fundamentally flawed, as well as depending on
too small of a sample. The biggest flaw was that the author was
comparing two separate skill sets; apples and oranges.
• The manuscript does not fit the journal’s objectives only with a
theory or a design. It has to include some practical data and analysis
results.
• Technology only plays a very secondary role in this paper, though It
is well-written, and a significant part of the interaction is done
through technology.
• Although a mixed methodology is used, the data discussed is mainly
on statistics.
• The manuscript should provide readers with some global findings
and implications instead of some local and parochial aspects of their
study.
31. Why were Indonesian Manuscripts Rejected?
• A small-scale study should have adopted a much different
research design as the sample size is too small for
generalizability. Even if the findings are not generalizable,
there is no sense as to how what is presented is different
from what already exists. For such a smaller sample a mixed-
methods approach might have been preferred where priority
is given to qualitative criteria where the notions of reliability
and validity are much different.
• Even though the article is well written and well organized, the
manuscript does not present any state-of-the-art conclusions.
• The quality of writing is very poor. It is wordy and often
incomprehensible. Simplifying the language would go a long
way to making it readable.
32. Recommendations
to avoid rejection
Visit the journal website and understand the scope
or objectives. Then write your manuscript in the
same style of published articles or following the
sample style if available.
Use a mixed method (a questionnaire and
interviews), collect enough data, and analyze
with a statistical software like SPSS.
Check the final version with Grammarly or a
similar spell and grammar checker or ask a
qualified native speaker of English to check and
then use Turnitin to make sure it is less than 15%
similarity index before its submission.
Review at least several references published in
the past five years and cite them in APA7 style.
APA7 training – Scribbr
(2021) or APA Overview of
Purdue's OWL (2020) are
good sites to check!
33. 6 Tips That Will Save You From Journal Rejection
Enago Academy (n. d.).
Choose one and right journal
Follow author/submission
guidelines
Avoid duplication and plagiarism
Focus on significant and new findings
Avoid discrepancies and answer the
research questions
Address ethical concerns
35. References
• Angelo State University, U.S.A. (n. d.). Library Guides: How to recognize peer-reviewed
(refereed) journals. https://www.angelo.edu/library/handouts/peerrev.php
• APA: Overview of Purdue's Online Writing Lab (OWL) (2020). https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=4TG0Wfurxzg
• CQU Library, Australia (n. d.). - Q. What is a refereed journal? 21212 ANSWER.
https://libanswers.library.cqu.edu.au/faq/160527
• DifferenceBetwen.com (2021). What is the Difference Between Peer Reviewed and Refereed
Journal. https://www.differencebetween.com/what-is-the-difference-between-peer-reviewed-
and-refereed-journal/#:~:text=A%20refereed%20journal%20is%20another,the%20
same%20field%20 before%20publishing
• Carleton University Library (2019, 3'25") What is a peer reviewed journal article?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8gaq7ei7zc
• Enago Academy (n. d.). 6 Tips That Will Save You From Journal Rejection.
https://www.enago.com/academy/6-tips-that-will-save-you-from-journal-rejection/
• Hernando, A. (2020, March). Eight reasons why articles are accepted (or not accepted)
https://doi.org/10.3916/school-of-authors-121
36. • Nonprofit Organizations Research Guide (n.d.). What is a Scholarly Journal?
https://libguides.unomaha.edu/c.php?g=100306&p=650509
• Sage Publishing (2022). How to Get Published: Submitting Your Paper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAd7HtbIjlA
• Simon Fraser University Library (n. d.): What is a scholarly (or peer-reviewed) journal?
https://www.lib.sfu.ca/help/research-assistance/format-type/scholarly-journals
• Study.com (n.d.). Peer Reviewed Scholarly Journal: Definition & Examples.
https://study.com/academy/lesson/peer-reviewed-scholarly-journal-definition-examples-
quiz.html
• Thrower, P. (2012, September). Eight reasons I rejected your article.
https://www.elsevier.com/connect/8-reasons-i-rejected-your-article
• Virginia Tech University Library, U.S.A. (n. d.). Evaluation Methods in Education: Refereed
Journals. https://guides.lib.vt.edu/c.php?g=134398&p=880869
• Wiley (n. d.). Types of Peer Review at Wiley journals.
https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/what-is-peer-review/types-of-
peer-review.html
References
37. Write your manuscript by
following the submission
guidelines accurately and
submit to a right journal!
Don’t forget to do both grammar
and Plagiarism checks and submit
the report together with your
manuscript!
Recommendation
39. Credits
Special thanks to all the people who
organized and held this awesome event:
● Dr. M. Faruq Ubaidillah
Department of English Education
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
Universitas Islam Malang
Jl. M.T. Haryono No. 193, Malang, East Java,
Indonesia
39
Editor's Notes
The articles are intended to be read by other experts or students of the field, and they are typically much more sophisticated and advanced than the articles found in general magazines.
Blue line 2021; Brown line 2022
YouTube video (2022, 2’35”) How to Get Published: Submitting Your Paper. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAd7HtbIjlA